FY2001 Approved Budget (263 Pages)

APPROVED FISCAL 2001

ANNUAL BUDGET

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 ANNUAL BUDGET

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary 1Annual Budget Summary ..............•..•......................... 3Organization and Staffing ...........•........................•.•••.. 9

Operating Budget 17Ridership and Revenues 29Metrobus .......•...•••.•.........•..........•......•..•.......••...... 39

Financial Tables .•...................................•..•...•.•. 42Statistics •...................•.........•..•....••..•......•....... 45Regional I Non-regional Costs .....•....•.••......•........ 53

Metrorail •...............•........•..............................•..•.•. 61Financial Tables .................•......•.....•.••...•.••....... 64Statistics ...•........•......•.............................•••..... 67

Metro Access ................•.......•...........•..••.••............. 81Debt Service •..••.......•..........••...••....•..•...............••... 87Professional and Technical Services .••.•.....•...........••.. 91Union Statistics •........•......•........•...•....•..••...•........... 95Fringe Benefits ..........•..••..•........•....•................••.•... 99

Infrastructure Renewal Program........................................ 103Overview ........................••.....•..•......................•..• 105Financial Tables ..............................•.•"' ....•..........• 107Project Descriptions •..............................••..•.......... 11 2

Rail Construction Program 139Financial Summary .................................•.............. 141Funding Sources ...............•.......•........................... 144Project Summaries

Franconia/Springfield Line 147Glenmont Line ......•.....................••••................ 149Mid-City Green Line 151Branch Avenue Line ...............•.......••..............• 153

Reimbursable Projects 155Operating Projects ......•................•••......••............... 157System Improvement and Expansion 161

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction 165Operating .............•...••..............0 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 167Infrastructure and Renewal Program 183Rail Construction Program II 190

Resolutions of the Board of Directors 197

- . ~. I'

I.;; ..

" ;' . I ":': 1. -.

:1

jII

I-',jiII

'i;' :.:.

\. I ~

." r·

-, ' l '~..:.r _.

" ,

;. ; t

..~ ;";

I

1/ijJ\I

.~

III

11.~

1IjI,I

:1I,

;I

\ r

This Page Not Used

I:

''''': . -~.~ ..". :)'," . /'

. ,r. .t:I ~ •

I,

i '. ~ \ '~ •

',.,',', .,1:". I

,fI

I'\,I

I,I:Ih,i

'I. ,.'.'

Summary

ANNUAL BUDGETSUMMARY

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Page 1

SummaryPage 2

This Page Not Used

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYAPPROVED FISCAL 2001 ANNUAL BUDGET

OVERVIEW

WMATAts Fiscal 2001 Combined Operating and Capital Budget exceeds $1.7 billion andis approximately $600 million larger than the Approved Fiscal 2000 Budget. It includesfive elements:

System Operating Budget $755.9 millionIncludes the cost to operate Metrorail, Metrobus and MetroAccess Paratransitservices, and Debt Service

Infrastructure Renewal Program $677.3 millionIncludes funds to repair and replace Metrorail and Metrobus assets

Rail Construction Budget $ 84.8 millionFunds completion of the 103-mile Metrorail system, the construction of a rail yardat Branch Avenue and the purchase of rail cars

System Improvement and Expansion Budget $229.9 millionIncludes Capital Reimbursable Projects requested by individual localgovernments or other entities, and funds to work on projects in the BoardApproved Transit Service Expansion Plan,' such as the Addison Road/SeatPleasant to Largo Town Center extension of the Metrorail Blue Line, andpreliminary work on a new Metrorail station 'at New York Avenue and a transitextension to Tysons Corner and Dulles Airport.

Reimbursable Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $11.7 millionIncludes operating funds for reimbursable services requested by individual localgovernments or other entities, such as the operation of the Potomac andRappahannock Transportation Commission bus service, selected MontgomeryCounty Ride On bus routes, Falls Church Hybrid - Electric Bus service program,and providing technical expertise and resources to support the District ofColumbia's Department of Public Works.

There are a number of significant changes and program initiatives included in fiscal2001. While the 103-mile rail constructi<?n budget continues to decrease as work on theoriginally planned system is completed, new commitments are being made to furthersystem expansion. This year funds are included to begin construction on a two stationextension of the Metrorail Blue Line from Addison Road/Seat Pleasant to Largo TownCenter in Prince George's County, Maryland. In addition, WMATA will" work with itslocal, state and federal partners to pursue transit system improvement and expansionprojects that will meet the current and future needs of the Washington metropolitan area.Improvements at the Mt. Vernon Square/UDC Metrorail station on the Green and YellowLines will provide convenient, direct access to the new convention center.Improvements at a number of stations in Arlington County, Virginia, will enhancepassenger access. Other initiatives will also be advanced, such as work on a new "infiJi" station on the Red Line at New York Avenue in the District of Columbia and a study

SummaryPaae 3

on a transit extension to Tysons Corner and Dulles Airport. These initiatives will ensurethat this region is prepared to meet the transportation challenges that will be posed overthe next twenty-five years.

Reinvestment in existing MetroraH and Metrobus assets remains a critical priority toensure the continued reliability of the system. It also represents a significant growtharea in the proposed budget, including a $398 million program to rehabilitate 364 Bredarail cars, a multi-year $90 million program to overhaul escalators and elevators and aprogram to purchase new bus fareboxes that will include SmarTrip capability therebyenhancing the integration of the bus and rail system for our customers.

The approved operating budget also includes a number of actions that will bringimmediate benefit to the region through added bus and rail service, and customerservice initiatives. Among these actions are the opening of the Branch Avenueextension of the Metrorail Green Line, new bus routes in the District of Columbia,Maryland, and Virginia, and marketing initiatives. In addition, the WMATA Board ofDirectors has approved the extension of Metro operating hours on weekends to 1:00 AMand a demonstration further extending hours to 2:00 AM. Also included is an addedemphasis on investments in workforce development through enhanced training and theimplementation of programs to develop critical skills, such as an escalator/elevatortechnical apprenticeship program that will move individuals into hard-to-fill areas that arecritical to ensuring the continued reliable operation of the bus and rail system.

The Fiscal 2001 Budget presents many challenges, including the need to adequatelyreinvest in system assets, to develop plans for system expansion to meet future needs,and to invest in human capital. This budget also builds on WMATA's successes. It willproduce clear benefits and a measurable return for the Washington metropolitan areathrough added service, improved system reliability, and enhanced opportunities forfuture transit system growth.

SummaryPage 4

WMATA BudgetFiscal 2001 Approved: $1.8 Billion

Where it Comes From

Federal I Other $1,031.2

Revenues $389.6

Gross Subsidy $338.8

Where it GoesSystem Improvements Reimbursable Projects& Expansion $11.7$229.9

Rail Construction $84.8 Operations$728.4

InfrastructureRenewal$677.3

Debt Service $27.5

$ Millions

SummaryPage 5

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGET

(Dollars in Millions)

REVENUE AND FEDERAL I LOCAL FUNDING

FISCAL 1999 FISCAL 2000 FISCAL 2001Budget Budget Budget

OPERATING BUDGET-Revenue $372.6 $357,1 $389.6Local Operating Subsidy 280.5 316,2 338.8

$653.1 $673.3 $728.4Local Debt Service Payment $27.5 $27.5 $27.5

$680,6 $700.8 $755.9

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM-ISTEA:

Federal Funding $6.5 $6.5 $6.5Local Assistance 1.6 1,6 1.6

$8.1 $8.1 . $8.1Section 5307:

Federal Funding $61.7 $68.3 $78.8Local Assistance 15.4 17.1 19.7

$77,1 $85.4 $98.5Section 5309:

Federal Funding $20.5 $33.4 $44.6Local Assistance 5.1 8.3 11.2

$25.6 $41.7 $55.8Additional Local Assistance

(Ramp Up) $0.0 $1.4 $2.2

Line of Credit Financing $0.0 $47.6 $481.3

Repairable Parts Reserve:Local Assistance $5.0 $5.0 $5.0

Bond Refinancing, IGF andReprogrammed Funds $15.5 $43.5 $26.4

$131.3 $232.7 $677.3

RAIL CONSTRUCTION -103 Mile System:

Federal Funding $5().1 $0.0 $0.0Local Assistance 30.0 0.0 0.0

$80.1 $0.0 $0.0

Construction In Progress $60.6 $140.8 $80.0

$140.7 $140.8 $80.0

89.5 Mile System $16.2 $10.0 $4.8

$156.9 $150.8 $84.8

REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS $11.7

SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS & EXPANSION $8.0 $57.2 $229.9

TOTAL REVENUE & FUNDING $976.7 $1,141.5 $1,759.6

Note: Reimbursable Projects were included in System Improvements & Expansion prior to FY 2001.

SummaryPage 6

Summary



FISCAL 2001Budget

BUDGETED RECEIPTS:

Operating BudgetLocal Operating Subsidy $338.8 19%Revenues 389.6 22%

$728.4

Debt Service Payment 27.5 2%

$755.9

Infrastructure Renewal ProgramFederal Grants $129.9 7%Financing 481.3 27%Local Assistance 39.6 2%Other 26.5 2%

$677.3

Rail ConstructionFederal Funding $0.0 0%Local Assistance 0.0 0%Construction In Progress 80.0 5%

89.5 Mile System 4.8 0%$84.8

Reimbursable Projects 11.7 1%

System Improvements & Expansion 229.9 13%

TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET $1,759.6 100%

BUDGETED COSTS:

Operating BudgetOperating Expenses $728.4 41%Debt Service 27.5 2%

$755.9

Infrastructure Renewal Program 677.3 38%

Rail Construction 84.8 5%

Reimbursable Projects 11.7 1%

System Improvements & Expansion 229.9 13%

TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET $1,759.6 100%

Page 7



MULTI YEAR BUDGET SUMMARY

FISCAL 1999 FISCAL 2000 FISCAL 2001Budget Budget Budget

OPERATING BUDGET -Metrobus $272.6 $274.5 $297.1Metrorail 367.5 384.5 406.7Metro Access 13.0 14.3 24.6

$653.1 $673.3 $728.4DEBT SERVICE - 27.5 27.5 27.5

$680.6 $700.8 $755.9

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM-Rail Car Rehabilitation $0.0 $0.0 $398.3Bus Procurements 32.6 19.0 34.3Bus Preventative Maintenance 10.2 10.2 10.2Escalator Overhaul & Maintenance 14.7 23.4 6.8Rail Car Preventative Maintenance 7.8 7.8 10.9Other Bus and Rail Projects 66.0 172.3 216.8

$131.3 $232.7 $677.3

RAIL CONSTRUCTION -103 Mile System:Blue Line $6.2 $0.0 $0.0Red Line 14.1 7.9 0.3Inner Green Line 21.1 17.8 5.1Outer Green Line 99.3 68.9 55.1Branch Ave. Yard 0.0 7.8 12.6Rail Cars 0.0 38.4 6.9

$140.7 $140.8 $80.0

89.5 Mile System 16.2 10.0 4.8$156.9 $150.8 $84.8

REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS 11.7

SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS & EXPANSION 8.0 57.2 229.9

TOTAL BUDGET $976.7 $1.141.5 $1,759.6

Note: Operating Budget is accrued expenses; IRP and Rail Construction budgets are obligations.Reimbursable projects were included in System Improvements & Expansion prior to FY 2001

SummaryPage 8

ORGANIZATIONAND

STAFFING

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Summary -- Organization and StaffingPage 9

This Page Not Used


~.

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYTABLE OF ORGANIZATION

FISCAL 20019,419 POSITIONS

Richard A. WhiteGeneral Manager

James Gallagher (A)Deputy General

Manager,Operations

I I

Harold BartlettSecretary &Chief of Staff

James StewartAuditorGeneral

IPeter Benjamin

AGMFinance & Program

Development

-

Cheryl BurkeGeneralCounsel

Fred GoodineChief Safety

Officer

Barry McDevittChief,

Metro TransitPolice

IP. Takis Salpeas

AGMTransit SystemDevelopment

Jack RequaCOO

Bus Operations

IGail Charles

AGMlA.dministrative Services

Lemuel Proctor (A)COO

Rail Operations

ILeona Agouridis

AGMCommunications


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

FISCAL 2001 APPROVED STAFFING

STAFFING SUMMARY BY OFFICE

FY2000 FY2001 NetAmended Approved Change

General Manager 2 2 0Secretary - Chief of Staff 5 6 1Auditor General 30 27 -3General Counsel 47 53 6Safety 26 28 2Metro Transit Police 406 423 17Executive Offices 516 539 23

Asst. General Manager - COMP 3 4 1Accounting 67 70 3Financial Management 28 27 -1Treasurer 131 135 4Risk Management 51 51 0Business Planning & Development 9 10 1Property Development & Mgmt 29 27 -2Business and Financial Planning 2 2. 0Finance and Program Development 320 326 6

Deputy General Manager - Operations 5 6 1Infrastructure Renewal Program 14 14 0Plant Maintenance 773 845 72Operations Planning and Admin Spt 161 269 108Americans With Disabilities Act 5 6 1Operations Support 958 1,140 182

Chief Operating Officer - Rail 3 3 0Rail Car Maintenance 775 810 35Rail Transportation 1,084 1,147 63Rail Systems Maintenance 716 758 42Track and Structures 323 347 24Department of Rail Operations 2,901 3,065 164

Chief Operating Officer - Bus 6 6 0Bus Transportation 2,454 2,526 72Bus Maintenance 829 873 44Department of Bus Operations 3,289 3,405 116

Chief Engineer 1 6 5Operations Engineering 19 58 39Quality Enhancement and Analysis 29 23 -6Operations Support 47 40 -7Chief Engineer 96 127 31

Department of Operations 7,244 7,737 493

Continued Next Page."""



FISCAL 2001 APPROVED STAFFING


FY2000 FY 2001 NetAmended Approved Change

Asst. General Manager - TSDV 4 5 1Construction 109 47 -62Engineering and Architecture 37 43 6Systems 13 16 3Major Capital Projects 29 27 -2Administration - TSDV 25 23 -2Renovations 33 12 -21Extensions 42 45 3Transit Systems Development 292 218 -74

Asst. General Manager - ADMN 27 32 5Information and Technology Service 113 122 9Organizational Development 14 14 0Civil Rights 16 16 0Procurement and Materials 184 179 -5Human Resource & Mgmt Planning 50 60 10Employee and Labor Relations 8 8 0Administrative Services 412 431 19

AGM - Communications 6 4 -2Media Relations 5 5 0Government and Community Relations 5 11 6Strategic Marketing & Communication 47 64 17Customer Service 99 84 -15Communications 162 168 6

Authority Total 8,946 9,419 473


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 APPROVED STAFFING


Operating CapitalTotal Para- Reimb. Reimb Rail Service

Office FTE's Bus Rail transit ~ Capital Constr. .....!BL Expansion

General Manager 2.00 0.80 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00Secretary - Chief of Staff 6.00 2.37 3.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00Auditor General 27.34 5.40 9.32 0.00 0.00 0.45 9.17 3.00 0.00General Counsel 52.00 20.26 17.35 0.20 2.14 1.76 6.17 4.12 0.00Safety 26.17 10.30 12.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.15 1.70 0.00Metro Transit Police 423.00 72.94 336.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.60 0.00 0.00Executive Offices 536.51 112.07 378.98 0.20 2.14 2.21 31.09 9.82 0.00

Asst. General Manager - COMP 4.00 0.62 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.11 2.09 0.00Accounting 68.41 23.91 28.67 0.38 1.03 2.08 4.19 8.15 0.00Financial Management 27.00 5.65 10.69 0.39 0.02 1.29 0.87 8.09 0.00Treasurer 131.16 23.72 101.21 0.62 0.00 0.37 1.18 4.07 0.00Risk Management 51.00 17.03 32.83 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.68 0.19 0.00Business Planning & Development 10.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Property Development & Mgmt 26.50 0.88 23.32 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.07 1.08 0.00Business and Financial Planning 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Finance and Program Development 320.07 71.81 208.84 1.39 2.32 4.95 7.10 23.67 0.00

Deputy General Manager - Operations 6.00 2.70 3.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00Infrastructure Renewal Program 14.00· 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 0.00Plant Maintenance 835.50t 119.21 634.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.10 71.95 0.00Operations Planning and Admin Spt 269.00 ~ 150.55 117.41 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00Americans With Disabilities Act 5.83 0.00 0.00 5.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Operations Support 1,130.33 272.46 754.75 5.83 1.00 0.00 10.14 86.15 0.00

Chief Operating Officer· Rail 3.00 0.05 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00Rail Car Maintenance 795.88 1.23 763.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.74 17.10 0.00Rail Transportation 1,114.43 0.50 1,097.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.42 0.00 0.00Rail Systems Maintenance 753.57 36.36 682.53 0.00 0.00 0.05 14.07 20.56 0.00Track and Structures 342.49 0.00 263.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.45 74.30 0.00Department of Rail Operations 3.009.37 38.14 2,810.49 0.00 0.00 0.05 48.68 112.01 0.00

Chief Operating Officer - Bus 6.00 2.96 0.02 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00Bus Transportation 2,349.69 2,254.54 5.17 0.00 85.95 0.00 0.00 4.03 0.00Bus Maintenance 871.17 819.47 21.02 0.00 30.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Department of Bus Operations 3,226.86 3,076.97 26.21 0.00 119.63 0.00 0.00 4.05 0.00

Chief Engineer 6.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00Operations Engineering 58.00 7.45 28.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.36 17.59 0.00Quality Enhancement and Analysis 23.00 7.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00Operations Support 40.00 3.45 29.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.65 0.00Chief Engineer 127.00 17.90 78.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.36 20.24 0.00

Department of Operations 7,493.56 3,405.47 3,669.95 5.83 120.63 0.05 69.18 222.45 0.00

Continued next page...


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 APPROVED STAFFING


Operating CapitalTotal Para· Reimb. Reimb Rail Service

Office ~ Bys Rail transit ...DRm:.- Capital Constr --lBL ExpansionAsst. General Manager - TSDV 5.00 0.00 0;50 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 0.50 1.00Construction 90.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 89.82 0.75 0.00Engineering and Architecture 40.17 0.00 7.32 0.00 0.00 4.16 13.37 1.32 14.00Systems 16.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 2.85 9.00 1.00Major Capital Projects 26.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.20 1.05 0.00 0.00Administration - T$DV 23.91 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 2.28 14.08 2.95 4.00Renovations 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 11.00 0.00Extensions 53.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.50 44.90 0.10 0.00 0.00Transit Systems Development 267AO 0.00 10.42 0.00 8.50 80.19 122.77 25.52 20.00

Asst. General Manager - ADMN 32.00 12.70 17.36 0.07 0.00 0.00 1.63 0.24 0.00Infonnation and Technology Service 122.00 39.93 61.90 0.50 0.00 0.00 3.47 15.20 1.00Organizational Development 14.00 6.20 6.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.85 0.00Civil Rights 16.00 5.35 6.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 2.92 0.00Procurement and Materials 179.00 61.03 79.20 0.00 0.00 2.23 20.40 16.14 0.00Human Resource &Mgmt Planning 60.00 26.64 26.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.56 5.00 0.00Employee and Labor Relations 8.00 3.75 4.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00Administrative Services 431.00 155.60 202.30 0.57 0.00 2.23 28.75 40.55 1.00

AGM - COmmunications 4.00 1.80 2.10 0.00 Q.1lQ 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00Media Relations 5.00 2.00 2.88 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.00Government and Community Relations 11.00 1.43 6.49 0.07 0.00 3.00 0.01 0.00 0.00Strategic Marketing & Communication 64.00 20.95 40.85 0.03 0.20 0.00 0.67 1.30 0.00Customer Service 84.00 43.18 38.77 2.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Communications 168.00 69.36 91.09 2.21 0.20 3.00 0.70 1.44 0.00

Authority Total 9,216.54 3,814.31 4,561.58 10.20 133.79 92.63 259.59 323.45 21.00


Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityFiscal 2001 Approved Annual Budget

Staffing by Union Category

Category Position FIE's

Permanent Non Rep TA 884 898.83

Non Rep TS 627 613.56

Local-2 TA 522 552.10

Local-2 TS 93 93.00

Local-922 303 300.00

Local-6S9 6,297 6,247.92

Transit Police 271 271.00

Special Police 65 65.00

9,062 9,041.41

Temporary Non Rep TA & TS 0 0.00

Local-2 TA & TS 0 0.00

0 0.0

Full Time 9,062 9,041.41

Part Time Non Rep TA & TS 0 0.00

Local-2 TA & TS 7 3.50Local-922 Bus Op 67 33.50Local-6S9 Bus Op 2S3 13S.24Local-689 Station Mgr 0 0.00

357 175.24

Total Positions 9,419 9,216.65


~

."

.'

Operating Budget

OPERATINGBUDGET

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Page 17

Operating BudgetPage 18

This Page Not Used

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 OPERATING BUDGET

The Approved Fiscal 2001 Operating Budget for the Washington Metropolitan AreaTransit Authority totals $728.4 million, or $55.2 million more than the fiscal 2000budget. The operating budget consists of three service delivery areas, or modes:Metrobus, Metrorail, and MetroAccess paratransit.

METROBUSThe Metrobus budget totals $297.1 million, of which labor costs are more than 85percent. Of the remaining costs, the single largest item is the purchase of materialsand supplies for operating and maintaining the bus fleet. Metrobus revenues total$106.7 million, resulting in a gross operating subsidy of $190.4 million.

METRORAILMetrorail operating costs total $406.7 million, excluding $27.5 million in debt servicepayments. Like Metrobus, the single largest cost is in labor, 74 percent of the total.Metrorail requires a significant annual investment in other expenses categories,specifically for services, materials and supplies to maintain the infrastructure, and inelectric power for rail cars, stations and facilities. Metrorail revenues total $281.6million, resulting in a gross operating subsidy of $125.2 million, in addition to anannual debt service payment of $27.5 million.

METROACCESSMetroAccess is WMATA's paratransit service as mandated by the Americans WithDisabilities Act of 1990. The fiscal 2001 budget totals $24.6 million composedalmost exclusively of contracted services, as all paratransit service is operated undercontract to WMATA. Revenues total $1.3 million. The total jurisdictional paymentsfor fiscal 2001 are $23.3 million.


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYREVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

Total 2001 Metrobys Metrorail MetroAccess

REVENUESPassenger $344,985.0 $91,096.6 $252,542.4 $1,346.0Other Passenger 3,000.0 2,100.0 900.0 0.0Parking 9,586.8 0.0 9,586.8 0.0Charter 1,442.2 1,442.2 0.0 0.0Advertising 13,886.9 9,304.1 4,582.8 0.0Joint Development 4,758.4 . 0.0 4,758.4 0.0Other 11,846.7 2,732.6 9,114.0 0.0Employee Parking 132.4 66.2 66.2 0.0

Total Revenues $389,638.3 $106,741.7 $281,550.6 $1,346.0

EXPENSESPersonnel $555,374.0 $253.431.1 $301,151.8 $791.2Services 62,494.7 12,535.6 26.432.0 23,527.1Materials & Supplies 52,749.3 23,827.0 28,904.3 18.0Fuel & Propulsion Power 37,712.5 10,050.6 27,661.8 0.1Utilities 20,828.9 3,933.0 16,892.7 3.3Casualty & Liability 8,115.2 5,447.7 2,667.5 0.0Leases & Rentals 3,726.9 1,385.1 2,141.1 200.7Miscellaneous 6,883.0 4,534.3 2,290.9 57.8Preventive Maintenance -$19,400.0 -$18,000.0 -$1,400.0 $0.0

Total Expenses $728,484.6 $297,144.4 $406,742.0 $24,598.2

GROSS SUBSIDY $338,846.3 $190,402.7 $125,191.4 $23,252.2

Gross Subsidy $338,846.3 $190,402.7 $125,191.4 $23,252.2Less: Audit Adjustment -20,516.0 -4,978.0 -17,548.0 2,010.0Plus: Debt Service 27.484.2 0.0 27.484.2 0.0

Net Local Subsidy $345,814.5 $185,424.7 $135,127.6 $25,262.2

Cost Recovery Ratio 53.5% 35.9% 69.2% 5.5%


Operating BudgetFiscal 2001 Approved: $728.4 Million

Where it Comes From

Rail Revenues $281.6

Other $20.1

Fuel/Propulsion $37.7

Materials $52.7

Operating Budget

Services $62.5


Paratransit $1.3

Bus Revenues $106.7

Where it Goes

Personnel $ 555.4

$ Millions

Page 21

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYREVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES· OPERATING

DISPLAYED BY ACCOUNT(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

Ejscal1999 Ejscal2000 Ejscal20Q1 Change

REVENUESPassenger $332,730.5 $322,940.6 $344,985.0 $22,044.4Other Passenger 2,728.4 3,000.0 3,000.0 0.0Parking 9,289.0 8,856.7 9,586.8 730.1Charter 2,101.0 1,461.3 1,442.2 -19.1Advertising 10,077.2 8,578.0 13,886.9 5,308.9Joint Development 4,912.7 4,130.5 4,758.4 627.9Other 10,626.9 7,975.6 11,846.7 3,871.1Employee Parking 118.9 132.4 132.4 0.0

Total Revenues $372,584.5 $357,075.1 $389,638.3 $32,563.2

EXPENSESPersonnel $491,010.6 $523,525.3 $555,374.0 $31,848.7Services 49,905.3 46,557.1 62,494.7 15,937.6Materials & Supplies 48,308.8 53,845.9 52,749.3 -1,096.6Fuel & Propulsion Power 33,944.8 38,260.9 37,712.5 -548.4Utilities 18,613.0 20,468.3 20,828.9 360.6Casualty & Liability 9,064.2 8,148.2 8,115.2 -33.0Leases &Rentals 2,641.8 3,365.0 3,726.9 361.9Miscellaneous -443.8 93.0 6,883.0 6,790.0Preventive Maintenance * -21,000.0 -19,400.0 1,600.0

Total Expenses $653,044.6 $673,263.7 $728,484.6 $55,220.9

GROSS SUBSIDY $280,460.1 $316,188.6 $338,846.3 $22,657.7

Gross Subsidy $280,460.1 $316,188.6 $338,846.3 $22,657.7Less: Audit Adjustment 14,683.1 -11,453.0 -20,516.0 -9,063.0Plus: Debt Service Cost 27,484.2 27,484.2 27,484.2 0.0


Cost Recovery Ratio 57.1 % 53.0% 53.5% 0.45%

"Preventative Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYREVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES

DISPLAYED BY MODE(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

Fjscal1999 Fiscal 2000 Ejscal2oo1 Change

REVENUESBus Operations $98,549.1 $95,903.5 $106,741.7 -$10,838.2Rail Operations 273,629.4 260,633.1 281,550.6 -20,917.5Paratransit 406.0 538.5 1,346.0 -807.5TOTAL REVENUES $372,584.5 $357,075.1 $389,638.3 -$32,563.2

EXPENSES·Bus Operations $272,575.9 $274,453.1 $297,144.4 -$22,691.3Rail Operations 367,470.3 384,466.4 406,742.0 -22,275.6Paratransit 12,998.4 14,344.2 24,598.2 -10,254.0TOTAL EXPENSES $653,044.6 $673,263.7 $728,484.6 -$55,220.9

GROSS SUBSIDY $280,460.1 $316,188.6 $338,846.3 -$22,657.7

Gross Subsidy $280,460.10 $316,188.60 $338,846.30 -$22,657.70Less: Audit Service 14,683.10 -11,453.00 -20,516.00 -9,063.00Plus: Debt Service Cost 27,484.2 27,484.2 27,484.2 0.0

Net Local Subsidy $322,627.4 $332,219.8 $345,814.5 -$31,720.7

Cost Recovery Ratio 57.1% 53.0% 53.5% 0.40/0


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYOPERATING EXPENSE BY OFFICE


General ManagerSecretary - Chief of StaffGeneral CounselAuditor GeneralSafetyMetro Transit Police

Executive OfficesAsst. General Manager - COMPAccountingFinancial ManagementTreasurerRisk ManagementBusiness Planning & DevelopmentProperty Development & MgmtBusiness and Financial Planning

Finance &Program DevelopmentDeputy General Manager - OperationsPlant MaintenanceOperations Planning and Administrative SupportAmericans With Disabilities Act

OperationsChief Operating Officer - BusBus TransportationBus Maintenance

Bus ServiceChief Operating Officer - RailRail Car MaintenanceRail TransportationRail Systems MaintenanceTrack and Structures

Rail ServiceOffice of the Chief EngineerOperations EngineeringQuality Enhancement and AnalysisOperations Support

Chief EngineerAsst. General Manager - TSDVConstructionEngineering and ArchitectureSystemsMajor Capital ProjectsAdministration - TSDVRenovations

Transit System DevelopmentAsst. General Manager - ADMNInformation and Technology ServiceProcurement and MaterialsHuman Resource & Mgmt PlanningEmployee and Labor RelationsCivil RightsOrganizational Development

Administrative ServicesMedia RelationsGovemment and Community RelationsAGM - CommunicationsCustomer ServiceStrategic Marketing and Communication

CommunicationsLess: Preventive MaintenanceTOTAL COST

FY 1999

584.9478.6

3,371.21,195.41,657.6

26.838.7$34,126.4

202.33,087.11,368.37,280.8

23,005.81.284.34,203.5

0.0$40,432.1

494.853,719.79,613.0

12.792.4$76.620.0

223.3136,091.463,181.8

$199,496.5238.7

53.095.973,068.193,697.715,983.9

$236,084.20.0

8,513.30.00.0

$8,513.349.8

303.3662.8555.9593.8145.8

0.0$2,311.3

3.329.310,897.99,763.16,833.01,040.01,035.3

0.0$32,898.5

468.2596.4626.0

4.883.83.871.7

$10,446.1

$640,928.4

FY2000

497.4620.9

3,821.11,239.82,425.9

28,552.9$37.158.0

208.53.688.01,983.98,134.5

19,919.32,094.55.008.1

188.0$41.224.9

993.4. 52,356.7

10,773.914,096.2

$78,220.1295.7

144,578.778,340.9

$223.215.4295.0

58,760.375,683.850,673.619,764.5

$205,177.10.0

5,903.02,421.5

49.251.3$57.575.8

8.60.0

304.2173.4

2.040.8

456.1$985.1

4.288.713,214.010,839.47,190.41,110.51,083.6

0.0$37,726.6

531.9608.2

1,008.05,789.55.043.2

$12,980.8-$21,000.0

$673,263.7

FY 2001

520.7821.2

3,816.01.168.12,363.0

29.533.7$38,222.6

334.03,556.42,453.0

10,105.120.252.32.274.05,307.1

140.7544,422.7

583.563,393.112,937.824,193.0

$101.107.5314.8

155,688.283,375.0

$239,378.0328.1

58,333.778,347.856,235.918.338.4

$211.583.8502.3

5,767.71,633.0

48.343.3$56,246.3

63.80.0

487.6332.9

0.058.7

0.0$943.04,304.4

14,822.510,720.65,950.61,215.91.109.63,000.8

$41.124.3647.0

1.024.6645.5

5,099.37,440.0

$14,856.3-$19,400.0

$728,484.6

Change

23.3200.3

-5.1-71.7-62.9980.8

$1,064.6125.5

-131.7469.1

1,970.6333.0179.5299.0-47.3

$3.197.8-409.8

11,036.52,164.0

10,096.8$22,887.4

19.111,109.55,034.1

$16.162.733.1

-426.62,664.05,562.2

-1,426.1

502.3-135.3-788.5-908.0

-$1.329.555.2

0.0183.4159.5

-2.017.9

-456.1-$42.1

15.71.608.5-118.9

-1,239.8105.4

26.03,000.8

$3,397.7115.1416.4

-362.5-690.2

2.396.8$1,875.5$1,600.0

$55,220.9• Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 DISTRIBUTION BY MODE AND OFFICE


Bus Rail Paratransit Operating

General Manager 241.1 279.6 0.0 520.7Secretary - Chief of Staff 375.8 445.3 0.0 821.2General Counsel 1.871.3 1,923.2 21.4 3,816.0Auditor General 435.7 732.4 0.0 1,168.1Safety 966.1 1,396.9 0.0 2,363.0Metro Transit Police 5,073.7 24.460.0 0.0 29,533.7

Executive Offices $8,963.7 $29,237.5 $21.4 $38,222.6Asst. General Manager - COMP 198.2 135.7 0.0 334.0Accounting 1,574.4 1.952.2 29.8 3,556.4Financial Management 1,008.2 1,410.6 34.3 2,453.0Treasurer 1,596.4 8.466.3 42.4 10,105.1Risk Management 11,363.6 8,888.7 0.0 20.252.3Business Planning & Development 0.0 2,274.0 0.0 2,274.0Property Development & Mgmt 79.9 5,227.2 0.0 5,307.1Business and Financial Planning 3.0 137.7 0.0 140.7

Finance &Program Development $15,823.6 $28,492.6 $106.4 $44,422.7Deputy General Manager· Operation 236.3 347.2 0.0 583.5Plant Maintenance 11,081.2 52.311.9 0.0 63,393.1Operations Planning and Administrati 7,254.4 5.683.4 0.0 12,937.8Americans With Disabilities Act 0.0 0.0 24,193.0 24,193.0Infrastructure Renewel Program 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Operations $18,572.0 $58,342.5 $24,193.0 $101,107.5Chief Operating Officer - Bus 311.8 3.0 0.0 314.8Bus Transportation 155,172.0 516.3 0.0 155,688.2Bus Maintenance 80.400.2 2,974.7 0.0 83,375.0

Bus Service $235,884.0 $3,494.0 $0.0 $239,378.0Chief Operating Officer - Rail 7.5 320.7 0.0 328.1Rail car Maintenance 52.0 58,281.7 0.0 58.333.7Rail Transportation 32.1 78,315.7 0.0 78.347.8Rail Systems Maintenance 3,772.1 52,460.4 3.3 56.235.9Track and Structures 115.0 18,223.4 0.0 18.338.4

Rail Service $3,978.7 $207,601.9 $3.3 $211,583.8Office of the Chief Engineer 0.5 501.8 0.0 502.3Operations Engineering 2,764.2 3,003.5 0.0 5,767.7Quality Enhancement and Analysis 545.9 1,087.1 0.0 1,633.0Operations Support 2,863.7 45,479.5 0.0 48,343.3

Chief Engineer $6.174.4 $50,071.9 $0.0 $56,246.3Asst. General Manager - TSDV 0.0 63.8 0.0 63.8Construction 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Engineering and Architecture 0.0 487.6 0.0 487.6Systems 0.0 332.9 0.0 332.9Major Capital Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Administration - TSDV 0.0 58.7 0.0 58.7Renovations 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Extensions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Transit System Development $0.0 $943.0 $0.0 $943.0Asst. General Manager - ADMN 1,547.1 2,713.3 44.0 4,304.4Information and Technology Service 6,498.8 8,274.0 49.7 14,822.5Procurement and Materials 4,612.5 6,097.5 10.6 10,720.6Human Resource &Mgmt Planning 3,137.6 2,813.1 0.0 5,950.6Employee and Labor Relations 597.2 618.7 0.0 1,215.9Civil Rights 503.6 606.0 0.0 1,109.6Organizational Development 1.663.0 1.337.7 0.0 3.000.8

Administrative Services $18,559.8 $22,460.2 $104.3 $41.124.3Media Relations 283.9 357.8 5.3 647.0Govemment and Community Relatior 195.1 824.1 5.4 1.024.6AGM - Communications 308.4 337.1 0.0 645.5Customer Service 2,582.4 2.391.0 125.9 5,099.3Strategic Marketing and Communicat 3.818.5 3,588.4 33.1 7,440.0

Communications $7,188.2 $7,498.4 $169.7 $14,856.3Less: Preventive Maintenance -18.000.0 -1,400.0 0.0 -19,400.0TOTAL COST $297,144.4 $406,742.0 $24,598.2 $728,484.6


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 OPERATING MODAL DISTRIBUTION


Total Bus Rail Paratransit

Full-Time Salaries 118,300.3 38,057.2 79,566.9 676.2Temporary Salaries 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Part Time Salaries 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Salary Lapse -6,748.0 -2,388.0 -4,316.4 -43.6Overtime Salaries 4,777.4 990.9 3,786.2 0.2Salaries (Total) $116,329.7 $36,660.2 $79,036.7 $632.8Operator Wages 164,484.7 114,868.3 49,616.4 0.0Full Time Wages 158,007.7 49,579.9 108,422.5 5.3Part Time Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Temporary Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Wage Lapse -6,598.7 -2,119.6 -4,479.0 -0.1Overtime Wages 11,700.5 3,988.6 7,711.5 0.4Wages (Total) $327,594.2 $166,317.2 $161,271.4 $5.6TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $443,923.9 $202,977.4 $240,308.1 $638.4Fringe Benefits 102,536.9 46,062.7 56,321.5 152.8Other Fringe Benefits 3,355.3 1,589.3 1,766.0 0.0Workers Compensation 5,557.9 2,801.7 2,756.2 0.0Fringes (Total) $111,450.1 $50,453.7 $60,843.7 $152.8

TOTAL PERSONNEL COST $555,374.0 $253,431.1 $301,151.8 $791.2

Management Fee 2,638.5 0.0 2,638.5 0.0Professional & Technical 13,320.1 5,528.5 7,700.6 91.0Temporary Help 1,108.2 239.2 833.6 35.3Contract Maintenance 14,925.3 3,399.5 11,502.0 23.7Custodial Services 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paratransit 23,273.2 0.0 0.0 23,273.2Other 7,229.6 3,368.4 3,757.3 103.9Services (Total) $62,494.7 $12,535.6 $26,432.0 $23,527.1Fuel and Lubricants 1,537.6 905.6 632.0 0.0Tires 1,844.9 1,770.3 74.6 0.0Other 49,366.8 21,151.2 28,197.7 18.0Materials & Supplies (Total) $52,749.3 $23,827.0 $28,904.3 $18.0Diesel Fuel 10,407.0 10,311.5 95.4 0.1Propulsion Power 27,305.5 -260.9 27,566.4 0.0Fuel & Propulsion (Total) $37,712.5 $10,050.6 $27,661.8 $0.1Electricity and Gas 17,089.5 2,505.7 14,583.8 0.0Utilities - Other 3,739.4 1,427.3 2,308.9 3.3Utilities (Total) $20,828.9 $3,933.0 $16,892.7 $3.3Insurance 2,296.7 1,066.7 1,230.0 0.0Claims 5,818.6 4,381.1 1,437.5 0.0Casualty & Liability (Total) $8,115.2 $5,447.7 $2,667.5 $0.0Property 1,108.8 654.2 254.6 200.0Vehicles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Equipment 2,618.1 730.9 1,886.5 0.7Leases (Total) $3,726.9 $1,385.1 $2,141.1 $200.7Dues And Subscriptions 382.6 159.5 221.7 1.4Conferences and Meetings 220.8 78.5 129.0 13.3Business Travel/Public Hrg 351.0 109.8 239.2 2.0Interview & Relocation 1,056.9 457.0 600.0 0.0Tolls 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Advertising 2,114.4 1',071.4 1,043.0 0.0Other 5,591.1 2,733.2 2,816.8 41.1Miscellaneous (Total) $9,716.8 $4,609.3 $5,049.6 $57.8Reimbursements -2,833.8 -75.0 -2,758.8 0.0Reimbursements (Total) -$2,833.8 -$75.0 -$2,758.8 0.0TOTAL NONPERSONNELCOST $192,510.6 $61,713.4 $106,990.2 $23,807.0Less: Preventive Maintenance -19,400.0 -18,000.0 -1,400.0 0.0TOTAL OPERATING COST $728,484.6 $297,144.4 $406,742.0 $24,598.2


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYTHREE YEAR OPERATING COST COMPARISON


Fiscal 1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001 Change

Full-Time Salaries 84,967.4 106,850.2 118,300.3 11,450.1Temporary Salaries 634.7 143.8 0.0 -143.8Part Time Salaries 127.0 36.2 0.0 -36.2Salary Lapse 0.0 -2,643.6 -6,748.0 -4,104.4Overtime Salaries 5,815.4 3,840.5 4,777.4 936.9Salaries (Total) $91,544.5 $108,227.1 $116,329.7 $8,102.6Operator Wages 156,237.0 150,958.6 164,484.7 13,526.1Full Time Wages 123,896.8 149,154.4 158,007.7 8,853.3Part Time Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Temporary Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Wage Lapse 0.0 -1,983.2 -6,598.7 -4,615.5Overtime Wages 15,737.0 4,576.1 11,700.5 7,124.4Wages (Total) $295,870.7 $302,705.9 $327,594.2 $24,888.3TOTAL SAlARIES AND WAGES $387,415.2 $410,933.0 $443,923.9 $32,990.9Fringe Benefits 93,102.4 103,343.0 102,536.9 -806.0Other Fringe Benefits 3,012.0 3,336.9 3,355.3 18.4Workers Compensation 7,481.0 5,912.4 5,557.9 -354.5Fringes (Total) $103,595.5 $112,592.3 $111,450.1 -$1,142.1

TOTAL PERSONNEL COST $491,010.6 $523,525.3 $555,374.0 $31,848.7Management Fee 2,194.2 2,638.5 2,638.5 0.0Professional &Technical 22,256.6 11,052.5 13,320.1 2,267.6Temporary Help 1,027.7 978.4 1,108.2 129.8Contract Maintenance 7,630.9 12,544.1 14,925.3 2,381.2Custodial Services 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paratransit 12,400.2 13,384.0 23,273.2 9,889.2Other 4,395.7 5,959.6 7,229.6 1,270.0Services (Total) $49,905.3 $46,557.1 $62,494.7 $15,937.6Fuel and Lubricants 1,003.6 1,465.6 1,537.6 72.0Tires 2,143.6 1,794.3 1,844.9 50.6Other 45,161.6 50,586.0 49,366.8 -1,219.2Materials & Supplies (Total) $48,308.8 $53,845.9 $52,749.3 -$1,096.6Diesel Fuel 6,950.3 8,461.1 10,407.0 1,945.9Propulsion Power 26,994.5 29,799.8 27,305.5 -2,494.3Fuel &Propulsion (Total) $33,944.8 $38,260.9 $37.712.5 -$548.4Electricity and Gas 15.120.8 16,801.7 17,089.5 287.8Utilities - Other 3.492.2 3,666.6 3,739.4 72.8Utilities (Total) $18,613.0 $20,468.3 $20,828.9 $360.6Insurance 1,887.2 2,398.2 2,296.7 -101.5Claims 7,177.0 5,750.0 5,818.6 68.6Casualty &Liability (Total) $9,064.2 $8,148.2 $8,115.2 -$33.0Property 728.9 587.4 1,108.8 521.4Vehicles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Equipment 1,912.8 2,777.6 2,618.1 -159.5Leases (Total) $2,641.8 $3,365.0 $3,726.9 $361.9Dues And Subscriptions 286.7 309.8 382.6 72.8Conferences and Meetings 121.5 154.1 220.8 66.7Business Travel/Public Hrg 233.5 232.0 351.0 119.0Interview &Relocation 795.9 595.5 1,056.9 461.4Tolls 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Advertising 1,051.6 1,113.9 2,114.4 1,000.5Other 389.7 505.3 5,591.1 5,085.8Miscellaneous (Total) $2,878.9 $2,910.6 $9,716.8 $6,806.2Reimbursements (Total) -$3,322.7 -$2,817.6 -$2.833.8 -$16.2Reimbursements -3,322.7 -2,817.6 -2,833.8 -16.2TOTAL NONPERSONNELCOST $162,034.0 $170,738.4 $192,510.6 $21,772.2Less Preventive Maintenance ." -21,000.0 -19,400.0 1.600.0TOTAL OPERATING COST $653,044.6 $673,263.7 $728,484.6 $55,220.9

·Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above


Operating BudgetPag.e 28

This Page Not Used

RIDERSHIP

AND

REVENUE

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Operating Budget -- Ridership and RevenuePage 29

This Page Not Used


r:

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 REVENUES

Total operating revenues for fiscal 2001 are projected at $389.6 million, comprisedof $345.0 million in passenger revenue and $44.6 million in other revenue. The fiscal2001 revenues are $32.6 million higher than the approved fiscal 2000 budget, withpassenger revenues increasing by $22.0 million and non-passenger revenues increasingby$10.5 million.

I. PASSENGER REVENUES

Metrorail passenger revenues for fiscal 2001, net of revenue integration, are projectedat $252.5 million, $14.5 million over the approved fiscal 2000 budget. A large partof the increase reflects continued ridership growth associated with strong economicdevelopment, opening of new Inner Green Line stations and increased tourism.System changes in fiscal 2001 include the January 2001 opening of the five OuterGreen Line Stations to Branch Avenue and the February 2001 opening of a new garageat the Vienna Metrorail Station. The increase in new rail trips generated by the BranchAvenue segment is projected at 22,000 daily trips, 18,000 new trips and 4,000diversions from existing stations. The Vienna garage will provide approximately 2,200parking spaces and is expected to provide a net increase of over 2,000 daily trips.

Metrobus passenger revenues, net of revenue integration, for fiscal 2001 are projectedat $91.1 million, $6.7 million higher than the approved fiscal 2000 budget. Ridershipgrowth and the addition of new service to address overcrowding on some routes willadd bus passenger revenue. A decrease in bus ridership along the Branch AvenueCorridor is projected due to the diversion of riders to the five new Metrorail stations.

The fiscal 2001 approved budget continues the Board approved integration of rail andbus passenger revenues initiated in fiscal 2000 as a result of the fare simplificationprogram. In the fiscal 2000 budget, $4.9 million in passenger revenues weretransferred from rail to bus to share the discount between the two modes. Also, fareintegration had resulted in $3.8 million being transferred from Metrorail to Metrobuspassenger revenue. The fiscal 2001 budget will transfer an additional $4.9 millionfrom Metrorail to Metrobus passenger revenue.

Total Metrorail and Metrobus ridership during fiscal 2001 is expected to reach 166.0million and 141.1 million trips respectively. This is 6.8 percent higher than thecombined rail and bus ridership budgeted for fiscal 2000.


Passenger revenues(In thousands)

METRORAIL METROBUS PARATRANSIT

Approved Fiscal 2000 Base Revenue $238,039.7 $84,362.4

Adjustment to Base 11,799.8 896.6Fiscal 2001 Service

Annualize Inner Green Line 936.0Growth 2,498.4 227.6Branch Avenue (January 2001) 3,700.5 (160.0)Vienna Garage (February 2001) ·468.0Guidance Based Bus Service 670.0

Fiscal 2001 New Bus Service 200.0

Revenue Integration (4,900.0) 4,900.0

Fiscal 2001 Approved Passenger Revenues $252.542.4 $91 ,096.6

Ridership 166,002.0 141,142.0

$538.5

29.8

777.7

$1 .346.0

782.9

II. OTHER PASSENGER REVENUE - SCHOOL SUBSIDY

The fiscal 2001 school subsidy reimbursement from the District of Columbia is $0.9million for rail and $2.1 million for bus, the same as the budgeted amount for fiscal2000. The District of Columbia subsidizes school student fares when District schoolstudents use Metrorail and/or Metrobus to attend school and school related activities.The District students, when using Metrorail and/or Metrobus, pay $0.55 or one-halfthe Metrobus base fare of $1.10. The students pay the $0.55 fare using a specialfarecard on Metrorail or a special token or ticket on Metrobus. With the studentpaying one-half the base bus fare or $0.55 per trip, the District of Columbia reimbursesthe Authority $0.55 for each student trip on Metrobus. On Metrorail, the Districtreimburses the Authority for the difference between the $0.55 paid by the studentsand the full regular fare for the trips made by the students.

III. PARKING

Parking revenues at rail stations are $9.6 million in fiscal 2001, or $0.7 million overthe fiscal 2000 budget. The increase is primary attributable to the opening of theBranch Avenue extension. The total fiscal 2001 available parking spaces include45,305 daily spaces, 2,458 metered spaces, and 1,365 monthly permit spaces for atotal of 49, 128 spaces.


IV. ADVERTISING

Advertising revenue in fiscal 2001 is estimated at $13.9 million, $4.6 million for railand $9.3 million for bus. The increases over fiscal 2000 of $1.7 million in the railmode and $3.6 million in the bus mode reflect an increase in the annual guaranteedrevenues provided in the advertising contracts between the Authority and the salescontractor and a multi-year advertising contract awarded to the Authority.

V. JOINT DEVELOPMENT

Joint development revenue is comprised of long-term leases of WMATA property andair rights for property adjacent to the rail stations. The fiscal 2001 joint developmentrevenue, credited to the rail mode, of $4.8 million is $0.6 million more than the fiscal2000 budget. The increase results from additional lease arrangements.

VI. CONTRACT/SUBCONTRACT SERVICE

Contract bus service is provided to member jurisdictions at an amount equal tooperating costs plus a portion of overhead costs, while subcontract bus service is ata per hour premium rate to generate a profit. Subcontract bus service is provided toany able and available organization engaged in surface transportation that either: 1)lacks the capacity; or 2) lacks the equipment to perform the requested service. Thefiscal 2001 budget assumes the continued operation of limited peak period service, inaddition to the service provided in the off-peak period. The combined revenue forcontract and subcontract bus services for fiscal 2001 is $1.4 million, which is $0.1million under the fiscal 2000 budget. This decrease is due to reduction~ in thecontract service to the Lorton facility.

VII. OTHER REVENUES

Other revenues included in the fiscal 2001 budget are from: vending machines; paytelephones; cellular telephones; bike programs; fiber optics; and miscellaneousrevenues, such as subrogation collections, scrap metal and surplus property sales. Thefiscal 2001 revenues of $8.9 million are $3.0 million higher than fiscal 2000. Theincrease is attributed to the lease of extended and new fiber optic cable contracts.

VIII. INVESTMENT INCOME

The fiscal 2001 budget of $2.9 million is based on an adjusted average monthlyinvestment portfolio of 58.3 million at an earning rate of 5.00 percent. Investmentincome is allocated to the rail and bus modes using the subsidy distribution from thefiscal 2000 budget.


IX. JGB PARKING FACILITY

In fiscal 2001, revenues from the JGB parking facility are $132,400 and are allocatedequally between the rail and bus modes. This amount is equivalent to the previousyear and includes 28 spaces at a monthly rate of $120 per space; 70 spaces at amonthly rate of $110 per space; and four spaces at a monthly rate of $40 per space,adjusted for an average of three spaces which may be vacant during the year due totransitions.


, ~ .

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 1998 THROUGH FISCAL 2001

0 REVENUE COMPARISON"C (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)CD..,mr-+ Change::l FromceOJ

Fiscal 1998 Fiscal 1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001 Fiscal 2000c Actual Actual Approved Approved Approveda.

<0BUS MODE(t)

,.-toPassenger Revenue (includes revenue integration) $83,845.5 $85,145.2 $84.362.4 $91,096.6 $6,734.2

:DOther Passenger - School Subsidy 1,740.1 1.916.1 2,100.0 2.100.0 $0.0

c: Contract/Subcontract 1,735.8 2.101.0 1,461.3 1,442.2 ($19.1)

CD.., Advertising 5,392.6 6,192.5 5.720.0 9.281.9 $3,561.9rn::r Advertising on Timetables 11.5 0.9 17.8 22.2 $4.4-c Total Advertising 5,404.1 6,193.3 5,737.8 9.304.1 $3.566.3Q)

::J Miscellaneous Revenues 927.6 947.3 841.7 867.9 $26.2c.::n Interest 1,867.5 2.186.7 1,334.1 1,864.7 $530.6CD< Employee Parking 53.1 59.4 66.2 66.2 $0.0CD::Jc Total Bus Mode Revenues $95,573.7 $98,549.1 $95,903.5 $106,741.7 $10,838.2(D

RAIL MODEPassenger Revenue $241.227.1 $247,179.3 $238,039.7 $252,542.4 $14,502.7Other Passenger - Schoof Subsidy 901.9 812.3 900.0 900.0 $0.0Parking 8,572.3 9,289.0 8,856.7 9.586.8 $730.1

Advertising 2,569.9 3.859.0 2.782.4 4,510.8 $1,728.4Advertising on Timetabfe 17.1 24.8 57.8 72.0 $14.2

Total Advertising 2.587.0 3,883.8 2,840.2 4,582.8 $1,742.6

Joint Development 4,428.9 4,912.7 4,130.5 4,758.4 $627.9

Fiber Optics 2,056.3 4,114.7 4.163.1 7,200.0 $3,036.9Miscellaneous Revenues 1,469.6 1,709.6 886.2 865.1 ($21.1)

Total Other Revenues 3,526.0 5.824.2 5,049.3 8,065.1 $3,015.8

Interest 729.0 1,668.6 750.5 1,048.9 $298.4

"U Employee Parking 53.1 59.4 66.2 66.2 $0.0w

(CTotal Rail Mode Revenues $262,025.3 $273,629.4 $260,633.1 $281,550.6 $20,917.5CD

W01 Continued Next Page...

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 1998 THROUGH FISCAL 2001

-cO REVENUE COMPARISONQ)-c (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)COcoen """l

W~ Change0) S' From

(CFiscal 1998 Fiscal 1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001 Fiscal 2000

tD Actual Actual Approved Approved Approvedca.ce

PARATRANSIT MODECD.-+

:DParatransit Passenger Revenue $383.8 $406.0 $538.5 $1,346.0 $807.5

c.:Total Paratransit Mode Revenue $383.8 $406.0 $538.5 $1,346.0 $807.5CD

"""len::r"0

REVENUE COMPARISON SUMMARYQ)

::Ja. Passenger Revenue $325,456.5 $332,730.5 $322,940.6 $344,985.0 $221044.4:c Other Passenger - School Subsidy 2,641.9 2,728.4 3,000.0 3,000.0 0.0CD< Contract/Subcontract 1,735.8 2,101.0 1,461.3 1,442.2 (19.1)CD Parking 8,572.3 9,289.0 8,856.7 9,586.8 730.1::Jc:(1)

Advertising 7,962.5 10,051.5 8,502.4 13,792.7 5,290.3Advertising on Timetable 28.6 25.7 75.6 94.2 18.6

Total Advertising 7,991.2 10,077.2 8,578.0 13,886.9 5,308.9

Joint Development 4,428.9 4,912.7 4,130.5 4,758.4 627.9

Fiber Optics 2.056.3 4,114.7 4.163.1 7,200.0 3,036.9Miscellaneous Revenues 2,397.3 2,656.9 1,727.9 1,733.0 5.1

Total Other Revenues 4,453.6 6.771.6 5,891.0 8,933.0 3,042.0

Interest 2,596.5 3,855.3 2,084.6 2,913.7 829.1Employee Parking 106.3 118.9 132.4 132.4 0.0

Total Revenues $357,982.8 $372,584.5 $357,075.1 $389,638.3 $32,563.2

o"CCD.....Q)

~.::seoOJc:CeoCDr-+

::JJa:CD...,en':3"

uQ)

:Ia.:XICD<CD::JCCD

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYRIDERSHIP BY SERVICE

FOR FISCAL YEARS 1994-THROUGH 2001(in thousands)

Fiscal 1994 Fiscal 1995 Fiscal 1996 Fiscal 1997 Fiscal 1998 Fiscal 1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Approved

Metrobus Ridership Trips 147,854.8 140,168.6 118,750.9 117,865.8 120,827.7 124,530.9 138,481.0 141 t 142.0

Metrorail Ridership Trips 149,731.0 153,640.0 145,738.0 148,040.0 156,192.0 157,220.0 163,275.0 166,002.0

Total 297,585.8 293,808.6 264,488.9 265,905.8 277,019.7 281,750.9 301,756.0 307,144.0

Note - Bus ridership has been restated to report unlinked trips. With fare simplification and fare integration, a comparison of bus ridership can onlybe made by reporting total boardings. Total boardings include cash, bus transfer, rail transfer, and pass riders. Previously, bus transfers were notincluded in order to record each rider only once. The implementation of fare simplification provides a regional bus transfer program regional OneDay pass (sold and accepted by all local bus systems) and a flash pass program recognized and accepted by all local bus systems.

This Page Not, Used


Operating Budget -- Metrobus

METROBUS

• REVENUE

• EXPENSE

• STATISTICS

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Page 39

Operating Budget -- MetrobusPage 40

This Page Not Used

~.

Bus ServiceFiscal 2001 Approved: $297.1 Million

Where it Comes From

Revenues $106.7


Where it Goes

Fuel $10.1

Personnel $253.4

$ Millions

Operating Budget -- MetrobusPage 41

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYREVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES - METROBUS


Fjscal1999 Fjscal2000 Fjscal2001 Change

REVENUESPassenger $85,145.2 $84.362.4 $91,096.6 $6,734.2Other Passenger 1.916.1 2.100.0 2.100.0 0.0Charter 2.101.0 1.461.3 1,442.2 -19.1Advertising 6,193.3 5,737.8 9,304.1 3,566.3Other 3,134.0 2,175.8 2,732.6 556.8Employee Parking 59.4 66.2 66.2 0.0

Total Revenues $98,549.1 $95,903.5 $106,741.7 $10,838.2

EXPENSESPersonnel $217,873.8 $238,596.1 $253,431.1 $14,834.9Services 15,394.2 11,044.0 12,535.6 1,491.6Materials & Supplies 19,777.1 22,677.6 23,827.0 1,149.4Fuel & Propulsion Power 6,946.6 8,410.1 10,050.6 1,640.5Utilities 3.509.8 3,886.2 3,933.0 46.8Casualty & Liability 6,574.1 5,416.1 5,447.7 31.6Leases & Rentals 1,511.4 1,335.7 1,385.1 49.4Miscellaneous 988.9 1,087.3 4.534.3 3,447.0Preventive Maintenance * -18,000.0 -18,000.0 0.0

Total Expenses $272,575.9 $274,453.1 $297,144.4 $22,691.3

GROSS SUBSIDY $174,026.8 $178,549.6 $190,402.7 $11,853.1

Gross Subsidy $174,026.8 $178,875.6 $195,380.7 $16,505.1Less: Audit Adjustment 0.0 -326.0 -4,978.0 -4,652.0


Cost Recovery Ratio 36.2% 34.90/0 35.90/0 1.00/0

*Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Financial TablesPage 42

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYMETROBUS BUDGET SUMMARY



Full-Time Salaries 27,010.4 32,651.7 38,057.2 5,405.5Temporary Salaries 138.4 78.5 0.0 -78.5Part Time Salaries 73.3 20.8 0.0 -20.8Salary Lapse 0.0 -344.7 -2,388.0 -2,043.3Overtime Salaries 719.8 733.5 990.9 257.4Salaries (Total) $27,941.9 $33,139.8 $36,660.2 $3,520.4Operator Wages 102,147.2 102,780.8 114,868.3 12,087.5Full Time Wages 37,918.0 49,958.6 49,579.9 -378.7Part Time Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Temporary Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Wage Lapse 0.0 -381.8 -2,119.6 -1,737.8Overtime Wages 3,640.3 1,860.8 3,988.6 2,127.8Wages (Total) $143,705.5 $154,218.4 $166,317.2 $12,098.8TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $171,647.4 $187,358.2 $202,977.4 $15,619.2Fringe Benefits 41.177.5 46,653.2 46,062.7 -590.6Other Fringe Benefits 1.682.5 1,628.5 1,589.3 -39.2Workers Compensation 3,366.4 2,956.2 2,801.7 -154.5Fringes (Total) $46,226.4 $51,237.9 $50,453.7 -$784.3

TOTAL PERSONNEL COST $217,873.8 $238,596.1 $253,431.1 $14,834.9

Management Fee 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Professional &Technical 9,964.1 3,918.9 5,528.5 1,609.6Temporary Help 453.8 249.5 239.2 -10.3Contract Maintenance 2,491.1 3.241.9 3,399.5 157.6Custodial Services 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paratransit 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Other 2,485.3 3,633.7 3,368.4 -265.3Services (Total) $15,394.2 $11,044.0 $12,535.6 $1,491.6Fuel and Lubricants 683.6 934.3 905.6 -28.7Tires 2,090.6 1,727.3 1,770.3 43.0Other 17.002.9 20,016.0 21,151.2 1,135.2Materials & Supplies (Total) $19,777.1 $22,677.6 $23,827.0 $1,149.4Diesel Fuel 6,946.6 8.410.1 10,311.5 1,901.4Propulsion Power 0.0 0.0 -260.9 -260.9Fuel & Propulsion (Total) $6,946.6 $8,410.1 $10,050.6 $1,640.5Electricity and Gas 2.236.0 2,507.4 2,505.7 -1.7Utilities - Other 1,273.8 1,378.8 1,427.3 48.5Utilities (Total) $3,509.8 $3,886.2 $3,933.0 $46.8Insurance 994.4 1,103.6 1,066.7 -36.9Claims 5,579.7 4,312.5 4,381.1 68.6Casualty & Uability (Total) $6,574.1 $5,416.1 $5,447.7 $31.6Property 661.6 512.0 654.2 142.2Vehicles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Equipment 849.8 823.7 730.9 -92.8Leases (Total) $1,511.4 $1,335.7 $1,385.1 $49.4Dues And Subscriptions 101.2 106.7 159.5 52.8Conferences and Meetings 50.1 61.2 78.5 17.3Business TraveVPublic Hrg 72.3 72.7 109.8 37.1Interview & Relocation 361.3 222.6 457.0 234.4Tolls 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Advertising 502.6 518.4 1,071.4 553.0Other 210.0 180.7 2,733.2 2,552.5Miscellaneous (Total) $1,297.5 $1,162.3 $4,609.3 $3,447.0Reimbursements -308.6 -75.0 -75.0 0.0Reimbursements (Total) -$308.6 -$75.0 -$75.0 $0.0TOTAL NONPERSONNELCOST $51,192.3 $53,857.0 $61,713.4 $7,856.4Less Preventive Maintenance -18,000.0 -18,000.0TOTAL METROBUS COST $269,066.1 $274,453.1 $297,144.4 $22,691.3

9Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above


FISCAL 2001BUS SERVICE ASSUMPTIONS

• 250 Weekdays, 58 Saturdays, 57 Sundays.

• Saturday Schedule - Holiday - July 4th, Columbus Day, Veteran's Day,

Martin Luther King's Birthday, President's Day

• Sunday Schedule - Holiday - Labor Day, ThanksgiVing Day, Christmas Day,New Year's Day, Memorial Day

• Eight Bus Garages will be available for all of Fiscal 2001

• Southern Avenue Annex will continue to operate peak period only service

• Arlington Garage will be a full service weekday facility

• Base for budget is the June 25,2000 schedule

• Ridership expansion and growth programs to be implemented during September2000 and January 2001

• The Branch Avenue Green Line extension bus turnback plan will be effectiveJanuary 13, 2001

• Does not include reimbursable bus service


METROBUS STATISTICSFor The Fiscal Years 1996 Through 2001

FY 1996 FY 1997 FY1998 FY 1999 FY2000 FY2001ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROVED APPROVED

STATISTICS:

Total Bus Miles (000s) 42,181 41,343 40.875 41,749 42,342 45,723

Scheduled (bUdget) Bus Miles (ODDs) 41,242 40,507 39.991 40,907 41,483 44,864

* Total Passengers (OOOs) 107,763 105,703 108,524 124,531 128,240 141,142

Bus Fleet Size (Year End) 1,366 1,279 1,287 1,314 1,361 1,421

Scheduled Buses (Maximum) 1.179 1,138 1.119 1,141 1,182 1,235

Total Passenger Revenue (OOOS) $ 86.580 $ 85,422 $ 85,586 $ 87,061 $ 86,331 $ 93,197

Total Operating Revenue (OOOs) $ 95,418 $ 93,822 $ 95,574 $ 98,549 $ 95,904 $ 106,742

Total Operating Net Expenses (OOOs) $ 276,532 $ 276,573 $ 271,013 $ 272.576 $ 274,453 $ 297,144

Total Operating Assistance (OOOs) $ 181,114 $ 182,751 $ 175,439 $ 174,027 $ 178,549 $ 190,403

RATIOS:

Passengers Per Scheduled Bus Mile 2.61 2.61 2.71 3.04 3.09 3.15

Passengers Per Scheduled Bus 91,402 92,885 96,983 109,142 108,494 114,285

Cost Per Total Bus Mile 6.56 6.69 6.63 6.53 6.48 6.50

Garages Parts Cost Per Vehicle Mile nla nla nla nla 0.12 0.12

Heavy Overhaul Shop Parts Cost Per Vehicle Mile nla nla nla nla 0.25 0.25

Total Bus Parts Cost Per Vehicle Mile 0.27 0.30 0.25 0.33 0.37 0.37

Cost Per Passenger $ 2.57 $ 2.62 $ 2.50 $ 2.19 $ 2.14 $ 2.11

* * Average Passenger Fare $ 0.80 $ 0.81 $ 0.79 $ 0.70 $ 0.67 $ 0.66

Passenger Revenue Per Scheduled Mile $ 2.10 $ 2.11 $ 2.14 $ 2.13 $ 2.08 $ 2.08

Operating Assistance Per Passenger $ 1.68 $ 1.73 $ 1.62 $ 1.40 $ 1.39 $ 1.35

Operating Assistance Per Bus-Total Fleet $ 132,587 $ 142,886 $ 136,316 $ 132,441 $ 131.190 S 133,992

Percentage of Operating Assistance to Cost 65.5% 66.1% 64.7% 63.8% 65.1% 64.1%

Percentage of Passenger Revenue to Cost 31.3% 30.9% 31.6% 31.9% 31.5% 31.4%

Percentage of Operating Revenue to Cost 34.5% 33.9% 35.3% 36.2% 34.9% 35.9%

* Bus ridership for fiscal 1999, 2000 and 2001 have been restated to report unlinked trips. With fare simplification and fare integration,

a comparison of bus ridership can only be made by reporting total boardings. Total boardings include cash, bus transfer, rail transfer

and pass riders. Previously, bus transfers were not included in order to record each rider only once. The implementation of fare

simplification provides a regional bus transfer program, regional One Day pass (sold and accepted by all local bus systems) and a

flash pass program recognized and accepted by all local bus systems.

*,. Average is lower than base fare due to transfers and flash pass impact.

Operating Budget -- Metrobus StatisticsPage 45

COMPARISON OF BUS MILES OPERATED

FISCAL YEARS 1999 THROUGH 2001

FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001ACTUAL APPROVED APPROVED

Regular Route 40,777,079 41,340,209 42,985,337

Scheduled Contract 39,979 26,691 25,953

September 2000 Service Plan 601,362

Dulles Reverse 539,270

January 2001 Service Plan 222,885

Branch Avenue Service Plan 287,663

Strategic 89,445 89,445 201,696

TOTAL SCHEDULED 40,906,503 41,456,345 44,864,166

Charter 140,536 175,000 175,000

Special Service 100,000 100,000 100,000

Change-Ofts 275,000 275,000 275,000

Yard Work 441,795 423,765 423,765

Missed Trips (115,000) (115,000) (115,000)

TOTAL UNSCHEDULED 842,331 858,765 858,765

TOTAL MILES 41,748,834 42,315,110 45,722,931

Estimated Articulated Busincluded in above 2,089,519 2,089,519 2,089,519


DEPARTMENT OF BUS SERVICEBUS OPERATORS

BY DIVISION AND CLASSIFICATION

FISCAL 2000 APPROVEDFyll-Time part.Time

FISCAL 2001 APPROVEDFyll-Time part.Time New Service

Bladensburg 344 24 343 30

Southeastern 256 14 258 2

Northern 270 4 263 17

Western 197 14 215 20

Southern Avenue Annex 28 13 25 28

Arlington 87 22 111 13

FourMile Run 210 52 200 49

Royal 96 20 76 29

Landover 212 40 216 40

Montgomery ~ ..1.3 2a1 22Total 1924 216 1938 250

Does not include 16 new service operators assigned to the Montgomery County Ride-On

13

9

9

9

4

§

50

FISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGETBUS OPERATORS

BY PROGRAM

Full TimelSpecial Part·Time New Service

Fiscal 2000 Approved Budget (Actual) 1,906 248 22

- September 2000 Bus Program 14 1 6

- January 2001 Schedule Program 18 1 22

Fiscal 2001 End of Year 1,938 250 50

Does not include Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission or Montgomery County

Ride-One contracts


DEPARTMENT OF BUS SERVICEFISCAL 2001 APPROVED

BUS OPERATOR PAY HOURS

3,706,473 3,713,807

419,346 579,937133,564 137,06723,440 20,03926,088 31,04953,387 60,33573,633 147,848

729,458 976,275

380,570 367,433139,280 163,794168,266 168,757

10,806 9,855698,922 709,839

5,134,853 5,399,921

SCHEDULED HOURSFull-Time OperatorsPart-Time OperatorsNew Service OperatorsSeptember 2000 Service PlanDulles ReverseJanuary 2001 Service PlanBranch Avenue Service PlanSubtotal· Scheduled

UNSCHEDULED HOURSOvertime Extra ServiceUtilityStanding ExtraSubcontract CharterMiscellaneousTrainingSubtotal· Unscheduled

HOURS FOR PAID LEAVEVacationSickHolidayFuneral! OtherSubtotal- Paid Leave

TOTAL PAY HOURS

FY 1999ACTUAL

3,706,473

FY2000ACTUAL

3,713,807

FY2001APPROVED

3,677,776309,16344,27560,76118,68019,18820,373

4,150,216

200,294110,92626,57130,80047,834

200,789617,214

378,912140,434187,242

11,002717,590

5,485,020

New Service Operators includes Lorton Contract Service.Total pay hours does not include Montgomery County Ride-On Contract.


FISCAL 2001BUS FLEET

MAXIMUM TOTALSCHEDULED ACTIVE

FLEET FLEET

Fiscal 1999 End of Year (Actual) 1179 1357

o September 2000 Bus Programs 20 23

o Falls Church Electric Bus 2 4

o January 2001 Schedule Program 22 25

o Strategic Buses 12 12

Fiscal 2001 End of Year 1235 1421

Exclude 10 scheduled and 2 spares assigned to theMontgomery County Ride-One Contract.

ACTIVE BUS FLEETAVERAGE AGE

END OF FISCAL YEAR 2001

NUMBER AVERAGEMANUFACTURER YEAR OF BUSES AGE

MAN 1983 31 18.0METRO FLXIBLE 1986 89 15.0METRO FLXIBLE 1987 101 14.0METRO FLXIBLE 1988 78 13.0GILLIG 1988 20 13.0METRO FLXIBLE 1989 35 12.0METRO FLXIBLE 1990 174 11.0ORION 1992 60 9.0METRO FLXIBLE 1993 85 8.0METRO FLXIBLE 1994 139 7.0IKARUS 1995 45 6.0ORION 1998 172 3.0ORION 1999 108 2.0ORION II 2000 2 0.0ORION V 2000 130 0.0ORION VI 2Q.QQ 1QQ M

TOTAL 1,369


BUS FLEET SIZE BY GARAGEFISCAL YEARS 2000 AND 2001

TOTALFLEET (a)

FISCAL 2000MAXIMUM

SCHEDULEDFLEET

TOTALFLEET

FISCAL 2001MAXIMUM

SCHEDULEDFLEET (a)

SPARERATIO

BladensburgSoutheasternNorthernWesternSouthern Avenue AnnexArlingtonFour Mile RunRoyalLandoverMontgomeryStrategic 'SYSTEM TOTAL

1911101381135668

14175

146144

1,182

2241291641316576

16083

165164

1,361

2071171331186067

15075

14515112

1,235

2421371581377076

17083

16417212

1,421

16.910/017.090/018.80%16.10%16.67%13.43%13.330/010.67°1'013.100k13.91°k0.00%

15.06%

(a) Does not include 10 scheduled and 2 spares assigned to the Montgomery County Ride-On Contract


"UQ)

coCD

C11~

0 DEPARTMENT OF BUS SERVICE"CCD MECHANICS BY DIVISION..,Q)

~.::Jcoro

FISCAL 2000 APPROVED FISCAL 2001 APPROVEDcc.

MILEAGE MILES PER MILEAGE MILES PERcoCD W/OCHARTER MECHANICS MECHANIC W/OCHARTER MECHANICS MECHANICr-+

II

s: BLADENSBURG 7,355,559 104 70,727 6,614,796 107 61,821CD SOUTHEASTERN 4,113,102 82,262 4.407,913,.-+ 50 57 77,332..,0c- NORTHERN 3,960,212 58 68,280 3,937,768 64 61,528c:en WESTERN 3,223,952 38 84,841 3,617,160 42 86,123enr+ ARLINGTON 2.663,811 22 121,082 3,045,493 27 112,796Q),-to

iii" FOUR MILE RUN 5,724.369 56 102,221 6,275,500 63 99,611d.n ROYAL 2,475.665 23 107,638 2,475,558 27 91,687fJ)

LANDOVER 6,585,958 59 111,626 6,797,340 64 106.208

MONTGOMERY 6,198,802 59 105.064 6,973,487 67 104,082

SOUTHERN AVENUE ANNEX 1,402,916 11 127,538

DIVISION TOTAL 42,301,430 469 90,195 45,547,931 529 86,102

BLADENSBURG SHOP 201 208

SYSTEM TOTAL 42,301,430 670 63,136 45,547,931 737 61,802

SERVICE VEHICLE SHOP 27 37

TOTAL MECHANICS 697 774

DEPARTMENT OF BUS SERVICEDIESEL FUEL COSTS

Miles Cost ofFY2001 Per Total Diesel@

Total Miles * Gallon Gallons $O.74/Gal

BLADENSBURG 6,644,982 3.11 2,133,827 1,579,032

SOUTHEASTERN 4,422,010 2.77 1,595,342 1,180,553

NORTHERN 3,970,671 2.56 1,548,998 1,146,259

WESTERN 3,628,477 2.73 1,329,433 983,780

SOUTHERN AVENUE ANNEX 1,402,916 3.26 429,883 318,113

ARLINGTON 3,045,493 3.92 777,789 575,564

FOUR MILE RUN 6,299,584 3.59 1,754,451 1,298,294

ROYAL 2,478,577 4.02 616,279 456,046

LANDOVER 6,813,211 3.60 1,891,987 1,400,070

MONTGOMERY 7,017,010 3.39 2,070,017 1,531,813

GARAGE TOTAL 45,722,931 3.23 14,148,006 10,469,524

SHOPS 120,299 89,021

TOTAL DIESEL COSTS 45,722,931 14,268,305 10,558,546

* Does not include reimbursable services


Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityFiscal 2001 Budget SummaryRegional/Non-Regional Costs

Metrobus service is designated by route as either regional or non-regional. The factors

used in determining whether a route is considered regional or non-regional include: the

alignment of inter-jurisdictional routes, routes operating on arterial streets, routes that

serve specific regional activity centers, and route cost effectiveness. These criteria

effectively allow for a delineation of all Metrobus service into th~ categories of regional

or non-regional routes, and the results are displayed by jurisdiction and by route on the

following pages.

This splitting of the Metrobus route system into regional and non-regional routes leads

in turn to an allocation of Metrobus operating costs into these same categories. The

approved fiscal 2001 total budget for Metrobus operating expenses (excluding

demonstration and reimbursable bus service) is approved at $297.1 million, which

represents the base of costs to be allocated between the categories of regional and

non-regional. A marginal costs analysis has been completed whereby those Metrobus

costs associated with the production of regional service have been identified and

segregated into a regional classification. The remaining costs are therefore, by

definition, non-regional.

To measure costs on a unit basis, platform hours are divided into the regional and non

regional costs. Platform hours are measured from the time a bus leaves a garage until

it returns to a garage, and are associated with trips that are regular (in-service) trips

and non-revenue (deadhead) trips. The following table identifies the unit costs for bus

service as approved in the fiscal 2001 budget.

Platform

Hours

Approved

Budget

Cost Per

Hour

Regional .•.•••. 2,836,089 ..... 244,729,100

Non-Regional • . . . 785,013. . . $52,415,300

Total •....... 3,621,102 .... $297,144,400

$86.29

$66.77

Note: Figures do not contain platform hours or budgeted costs for demonstration and/or reimbursable bus service.

Operating Budget -- Regional/Non-Regional Bus CostsPage 53

:tJCD

COo'::JD>

zo::1I

:JJCD

COo::JQ)

IIIc:C/)

no~en

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYMETROBUS REGIONAL AND NON-REGIONAL ROUTE SUMMARY

FISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGET

ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURSBase September 2000 January 2001

June 26, 2000 Service ServiceSchedule Changes Changes Total

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REGIONAL 1.394,263 16.292 10.775 1.421.330NON-REGIONAL 330,249 3,152 10.915 344.316

MARYLAND REGIONAL 753.541 16.890 14.244 784.675NON-REGIONAL 312,372 330 1.742 314.444

VIRGINIA REGIONAL 616.694 13,390 0 630,084NON-REGIONAL 123.473 2.781 0 1261254

TOTAL REGIONAL 2.764.498 46,572 25.018 2.836.089NON-REGIONAL 766,094 6.262 12,657 785.013

TOTAL - REGULAR ROUTE SERVICE 3,530,592 52,835 37,675 3,621,102

DEMONSTRATION 27,447 17.966 0 45.413OTHER 24,571 0 0 24.571

TOTAL PLATFORM HOURS 3,582,609 70,801 37.675 3,691,086

Platform hours relating to the Friday and Saturday 1:00 a.m. and 2:00 s.m. Metrorail closing Is contained within the base schedule.

0'"C METROBUS REGIONAL AND NON-REGIONAL ROUTE SUMMARY

CDFISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGET..,

Q)r-+:J ROUTES OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

CO

OJC ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURSC. Base September 2000 January 2001(Q(1) DISTRICT OF June 26, 2000 Service Servicer+

COLUMBIA ROUTES LINEHAME Schedule Changes Changes Total

:IJ 30,32.34,35,36 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE 146.170 1.133 6,194 153.497CD 42 MOUNT PLEASANT 61,078 0 61.078COo· 52,53,54 14TH STREET 80.937 412 81.349

:J 60,62,64 PETWORTH -11TH STREET 21,665 0 21.665Q) 62 TAKOMA-PETWORTH 19,794 0 19.794

"""- 66.68 PETWORTH - 11TH STREET 35,486 0 35A86

Z 70.71 GEORGIA AVE-7TH ST 90,773 0 90.773

0 80 NORTH CAPITOL ST 51.156 0 51,156::J 90.92 U ST-GARFIELD 94,917 0 2.102 97,019

J 91,93 GARFIELD OWL 5,854 0 256 6,110:0CD 94.95 STANTONRO 12,015 0 (140) 11,875

(Q 96.97 EAST CAPITOL ST-CARDOZO 47,846 0 47,8460 A2.3,6.7,8.42.46,48 ANACOSTIA-CONGRESS HEIGHTS 76,424 0 (1,884) 74,540::J A4,A5 ANACOSTIA-FORT DRUM 20,274 0 20.274Q)

A9 SOUTH CAPITOL ST 9,360 0 9.360m 82 BLADENSBURG RD-ANACOSTIA 54.280 (2,145) 52.136c:: 01.3.6 SIBLEY HOSPITAL-STADIUM ARMORY 66.860 412 67.272VJ

05 MACARTHUR BLVD...GEORGETOWN 3,792 0 3,792n E2,E3.E4 MILITARY RO-CROSSTOWN 45,931 0 45.9310 G2 P ST-lEDROIT PARK 24,858 0 24,858en,-+ G8 RHODE ISLAND AVE 33,039 0 33.039en

H1 BROOKLAND-POTOMAC PARK 4,738 4,738H2,H3. H4 CROSSTOWN 49.681 0 49,681L1,L2 CONNECTICUT AVE 36,290 0 36,290l4 CONNECTICUT AVENUE 3.914 3,914N1,N2,N3.N4 MASSACHUSETTS AVE 41,743 0 41143S1 16TH ST-POTOMAC PARK 9.118 0 9,11852.54 16TH ST 93.257 0 93.257U2 MINNESOTA AVENUE-ANACOSTIA 7,828 7,828V5 FAIRFAX VllLAGE-l'ENFANT PLAZA 7,465 0 (667) 6,798V6,V7,V8,V9 MINNESOTA AVE-M ST 41.683 0 41.683W4 DEANWOOD-ALABAMA AVE 40,960 0 40,960W9 DEFENSE FACILITIES SHUTTLE 2,913 0 2.913

"'UXi BENNING RD-POTOMAC PARK 9,195 0 9,195

Q) X2 BENNING RD-H ST 59,446 0 59,446CO NAVY YARD 4,914 4,914CD

01 TOTAL D.C. REGIONAL 1,394,263 16,292 10.775 1,421.33001

JJCD

COo::JQ)

zo:::J

I

:JJ(1)

CO

o::JQ)

OJcennoen,....(J)

METROBUS REGIONAL AND NON·REGIONAl ROUTE SUMMARYFISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGET

ROUTES OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURSBase September 2000 January 2001

June 26. 2000 Service ServiceMARYLAND ROUTES LINE NAMES Schedule Changes Changes Total

81.82,83,86 MARYLAND AVE 49.488 49,48884,85 RHODE ISLAND AVE-NEW CARROLLTON 16,904 16,904A11.A12.A15 M L KING JR HWY 40,317 40,317C2,C4 GREENBEL~TWINBROOK 64.322 6,796 71,118C7,C9 GREENBELT-GLENMONT LINE 10.094 10,094C8 GLENMONT-COLLEGE PARK 11 17,229 17,229C11.C13 CLINTON EXPRESS 9,920 (2.504) 7,416C12,C14 HILLCREST HEIGHTS 9.244 507 9,751012,S12 EASTOVER-MARLOW HEIGHTS 12,921 1.184 14.105F1.F2 CHILLUMRD 22,404 22,404F4,F6 PRINCE GEORGE'S-SILVER SPRING 46,806 46,806H11.12.14 MARLOW HEIGHTS 22,949 (4,948) 18,001J1,J2.J3 BETHESDA-SILVER SPRING 55,886 55,886K6 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE·MARYLAND 35.988 35,988K12,K19 FORESTVILLE 20,926 748 21,673M11 SUITLAND 8,700 (4,072) 4.628N7 MONTG MALL-FED TRIANGLE EXPRESS 4.138 4,138P12 EASTOVERMADDISON RD 31.934 4,436 36.370P13 EASTOVER-PENTAGON EXPRESS 2,138 2.138P17,18,19 OXON HILL-FORT WASHINGTON 16,093 (585) 15,508Q1.02 VEIRS MILL RD 62,962 62.962R1.2,5 RIGGSRD 24,696 24,696T18 ANNAPOLIS RO 26,937 26,937V12 ADDISON RO-POTOMAC AVE 13,839 (722) 13,117W11,12,15.17 EASTOVER-INDIAN HEAD HWY 19,017 7,096 26,113W13,W14 BOCKRD 9.593 234 9.827Y7,8,9 GEORGIA AVE-MARYLAND 57,627 57.627Z8 FAIRLAND 31,473 31,47314ABM BETHESDA-TYSONS EXPRESS 9,525 9,52514C,14D LAKEFOREST-TYSONS EXPRESS 9,568 9.568BRANCH AVE-KrNG ST 0 12,870 12.870

TOTAL MARYLAND REGIONAL 753.541 16.890 14,244 784,675

1/ Mld.day and Sa'urrlay service was added September 28. 1998 as experimental service; made permanent In July 1999. Does not Include the proposed extension of this line to White Flint.

" l -

0 METROBUS REGIONAL AND NON-REGIONAL ROUTE SUMMARY"'C FISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGETCD..,Q)

ROUTES OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCEcr.::s

CO

CD ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURSc Base September 2000 January 2001a.

CO June 26, 2000 Service ServiceCD VIRGINIA ROUTES LINE NAMES Schedule Changes Changes Totalr-+

:JJ 1BCDEFZ WILSON BLVD-FAIRFAX 38,886 38,886CD 2ABCG WASHINGTON BLVD 42,092 42,092COO· 3ABEF LEEHWY 36.224 36,224:::J 4ABEHS PERSHING DR-ARLINGTON BLVD 23,848 23,848Q) 7ABCDEFHPWX L1NCOLNIA-NORTH FAIRLINGTON 40.073 40,073

'- 8SWXZ FOXCHASE-SEMINARY VALLEY 12,800 12,800

Z 9AE FORT BELVOIR-PENTAGON 46,382 46,382

0 9N,9P ALEXANDRIA-POTOMAC YARD C. 0 12,978 12,978:::J 10AE HUNTING TOWERS-PENTAGON 23,174 23,174

I 10BCD ALEXANDRIA-ARLINGTON 38,397 38,397:DCD 11Y MT VERNON EXPRESS 3,018 412 3,430

CO 13ABFGM NATL AIRPORT-PENTAGON-WASHINGTON 15,425 15,4250 14T,W TYSON'S WEST PARK SHUTILE 8,295 8,295:::J 15KL CHAIN BRIDGE RD 10,487 10,487Q)

16ABCDEFGJL COLUMBIA PIKE 49,819 49,819OJ 16SUWX SHIRLINGTON-PENTAGON 11,120 11,120C 22ABCF WALKER CHAPEL-PENTAGON 21,853 21,853rn(')

23ABCT MCLEAN-CRYSTAL CITY 44,649 44,649

0 24MP BALLSTON-PENTAGON 7,796 7,796rn 25AFGJPR BALLSTON-BRADLEE-PENTAGON 18,083 18,083r-+ 258 LANDMARK-BALLSTON 14,826 14,826rn

28AB ALEXANDRIA-TYSONS CORNER 40,048 40,04828FG SKYLINE CITY 4,363 4,36329CEGHX ANNANDALE 20,043 20,04329KMN ALEXANDRIA-FAIRFAX 19,636 19,63638B BALLSTON-FARRAGUT SQUARE 19.606 19,606VARIOUS 5.751 5,751

TOTAL VIRGINIA REGIONAL 616,694 13,390 0 630.084

""UQ)

COCD(J1"'-J

-00 METROBUS REGIONAL AND NON-REGIONAL ROUTE SUMMARYOlU FISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGETCOmCD..,C1I~ NON-REGIONAL ROUTES005·

r.cm ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURSc

Base September 2000 January 2001C.(Q DISTRICT OF June 28, 2000 Service ServiceCD

COLUMBIA ROUTES LINE NAME Schedule Changes Changes Totalr-+

:IJ 88.89 FORT LINCOLN SHUTTLE 5,730 309 6,039CD D2 GLOVER PARK-DUPONT CIRCLE 16,180 41 16.221

CO D4 IVY CITY-UNION STATION 16,842 16.842o· D8 HOSPITAL CENTER 25.418 968 26,386::J E6 CHEVY CHASE 5,530 5.530Q)

H5,7 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS-MOUNT PLEASANT 3,683 3,683.........

H6 BROOKLAND-FORT LINCOLN LOOP 18,811 18,811Z H8,H9 PARK RD-BROOKLAND 22,736 906 23,6430:J K2 TAKOMA-FORT TOTTEN 5.958 5,958,

L30~34 OYSTER/LEWIS SCHOOL 2,080 2,080JJCD M4 NEBRASKA AVE 10,450 10.450

CO M6 FAIRFAX VILLAGE 4,668 2,775 7,443o· M20 SE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SHUTTLE 13.101 2,138 15.238~ N8 VAN NESS-WESLEY HEIGHTS LOOP 11,594 11,594~ P1.P2,P6 ANACOSTIA-ECKINGTON 39,499 39.499OJ U4 SHERIFF RD-RIVER TERRACE 10,560 927 11,487C

U5.U6 MAYFAIR-MARSHALL HEIGHTS 21,665 21,665enn U8 CAPITOL HEIGHTS-BENNING HEIGHTS 28,549 28,549

0 W1,W2 FT STANTON-WASHINGTON OVERLOOK 15,773 1.440 17,212(J) W6.W8 GARFIELD-ANACOSTIA LOOP 27.165 27.165,....en X8 MARYLAND AVE 8,017 8.017

98 ADAMS MORGAN-U STREET LINK 7.231 7,23199 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS-WOODLEY PARK LOOP 1,768 1.768SCHOOL SERVICE (VARIOUS) 7,243 7,243New Routes reo Branch 4.563 4,563

TOTAL DC NON-REGIONAL 330,249 3,152 10,915 344,316

\Jw

COCD01CD

0 METROBUS REGIONAL AND NON-REGIONAL ROUTE SUMMARYU FISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGETCD,

NON-REGIONAL ROUTESQ),....:::J

CO ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURSCD Base September 2000 January 2001c: June 26, 2000 Service Servicea. MARYLAND ROUTeS LINE NAME Schedule Changes Changes Total

COCD

87,88 LAUREL EXPRESS 8,925 8,925 Prince George's Countyr+89,89M LAUREL 6,600 329.6 6.930 Prince George's County821,822 BOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY 7,350 7,350 Prince George's County

JJ 823,824 BOWIE-BELAIR 9,163 9,163 Prince George's CountyCD 825 BOWIE-NEW CARROLLTON 3.375 3.375 Prince George's Countyce0

C7 TWINBROOK·SILVER SPRING 4.000 4,000 Montgomery County

:::J C21,22,23,24.25,26,29 CENTRAL AVENUE 23,198 23,198 Prince George's County

OJ C28 POINTER RIDGE 5,795 5.795 Prince George's CountyFB PRINCE GEORGE'S-LANGLEY PARK 16.404 16.404 Prince George's County

........... F12 ARDWICK INDUSTRiAl PARK SHUITLE 6,405 6,405 Prince George's CountyZ F13 CHEVERLY-WASH BUSINESS PARK 8,333 8,333 Prince George's County0 F14 SHERIFF RD 14,650 1,742 16.392 Prince George's County::J J8.9 1-270 EXPRESS 7.355 7,355 Montgomery County•:D J11.12.13.14.15 MARLBORO PIKE 15,420 15,420 Prince George's CountyCD L7.L8 CONNECTICUT AVE·MARYlAND 22,078 22.078 Montgomery COunty

CO R3 GREENBELT-FORT TOTTEN 14,813 14,813 Prince George's County0 R4 QUEENS CHAPEL RD 12.049 12.049 Prince George's County::J R12 KENILWORTH AVE·NEW CARROLLTON 22,967 22.967 Prince George's CountyQ) T2 RIVERRD 19.265 19,265 Montgomery County

tD T15,16,17 GREENBELT 14,143 14.143 Prince George's County

c: V14,15 DISTRICT HEIGHTS 16,373 16,373 Prince George's COunty(J) Z1.4 GLENMONT-SILVER SPRING 10,475 10,475 Montgomery County

n Z315 COLESVILLE..FAIRLAND EXPRESS 6.033 6.033 Montgomery County

0 Z2 COLESVILLE RD 15.313 15.313 Montgomery Countyen Z7,9,17,19 OLD COLUMBIA PIKE EXPRESS 8,550 8,550 Montgomery County..... Z11 BRIGGS CHANEY PARK & RIDE EXPRESS 9,818 9,818 Montgomery Countyen

229 BURTONSVilLE EXPRESS 3,525 3,525 Montgomery County

TOTAL MARYLAND NON-REGIONAL 312,372 330 1.742 314.444

MONTGOMERY COUNTY - NON-REGIONAL 106,410 0 0 106,410PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY - NON-REGIONAL 205,962 330 1742 208,034TOTAL MARYLAND NON-REGIONAL 312,372 330 1,742 314.444

METROBUS REGIONAL AND NON-REGIONAL ROUTE SUMMARYFISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGET

NON-REGIONAL ROUTES

-000)-0COco(0..,

mSOS'

eeOJc:CeoCDr-+

VIRGINIA ROUTES LINE NAME

BaseJuno 26, 2000

Schedule

ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURSSeptember 2000 January 2001

Service ServIceChanges Changes

TOTAL VIRGINIA NON..REGIONAL

:0CD

COo·::JQ)

zo::Jr

::0CD

eoO·:::JQ)

mc(J)

noenr-+en

2W3WZ11P12CD12EF12lM12RS17ABFM17GHKL18EF18GHJ18P,18R,18S20FVWXY21ABCDF24T28C

DEMOG1829891S80,8126A.E26W

19023899

VIENNA-OAKTONWESTPARK-WEST FALLS CHURCHALEXANDRIA-NATIONAL AIRPORTCENTREVILLE NORTHCENTREVILLE SOUTHLITTLE ROCKY RUN-VIENNASULLY STATION-VIENNAKINGS PARKKINGS PARK EXPRESSSPRINGFIELDORANGE HUNTBURKE CENTRECHANTILLY-GREENBRIARLANDMARK-PENTAGONMCLEAN HAMLET-EAST FALLS CHURCHKING ST. - NVCC

GREENBELT PK LOT SHUTIlECROFTON-NEW CARROLLTONSPRINGFIELD SHUTTLESPRINGFIELD LOOPELECTRIC BUS EAST FALLS CHURCHELECTRIC BUS WEST FALLS CHURCHDULLES REVERSELORTONShelter OCCU CTROperator ShuttresFarebox

2,2003,8631.6804.2805,4884,1436.905

13,66320.680

4,2639,308

17,0038,258

11,4683,6806,595

123,473

2,2202.3882,330

11,4956,9572,058

3.34175

8,23512,920

2,781

17.966

o

2,2003.8631.6804.2808,2694,1436,905

13,66320,680

4,2639,308

17,0038.258

11,4683.6806,595

126,254

2,2202,3882,330

11,4956,9572,058

17t9663.341

758.235

12.920

Fairfax CountyFairfax CountyAlexandriaFairfax CountyFairfax CountyFairfax CountyFairfax CountyFairfax CountyFairfax CountyFairfax CountyFairfax CountyFairfax CountyFairfax CountyAlexandriaFairfax CountyAlexandria

METRORAIL

• REVENUE

• EXPENSE

• STATISTICS

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

-, Operating Budget -- MetrorailPage 61

Operating Budget-- MetrorailPage 62

This Page Not Used

Rail ServiceFiscal 2001 Approved: $406.7 Million

Where it Comes FromRevenues $281.6


Where it Goes

Propulsion $ 27.7

Materials $28.9

Services $26.4Personnel $301.2

$ Millions

Operating Budget -- MetrorailPage 63

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYREVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES - METRORAIL


Fjscal1999 Fjscal2000 Fjscal2001 Change

REVENUESPassenger $247,179.3 $238,039.7 $252,542.4 $14,502.7Other Passenger 812.3 900.0 900.0 0.0Parking 9,289.0 8,856.7 9,586.8 730.1Advertising 3,883.9 2,840.2 4,582.8 1,742.6Joint Development 4,912.7 4,130.5 4,758.4 627.9Other 7A92.8 5,799.8 9,114.0 3,314.2Employee Parking 59.4 66.2 66.2 0.0

Total Revenues $273,629.4 $260,633.1 $281,550.6 $20,917.5

EXPENSESPersonnel $272,703.5 $284,172.3 $301,151.8 $16,979.5Services 22,014.8 21,939.3 26,432.0 4,492.7Materials & Supplies 28,481.8 31,163.8 28,904.3 -2,259.5Fuel & Propulsion Power 26,998.2 29,850.8 27,661.8 -2,189.0Utilities 15,099.3 16,578.6 16,892.7 314.1Casualty & Liability 2,490.1 21732.1 2,667.5 -64.6Leases & Rentals 11130.3 2,029.0 2,141.1 112.1Miscellaneous -1,447.7 -999.5 2,290.9 3,290.4Preventive Maintenance 0.0 -3,000.0 -1 AOO.O 1,600.0

Total Expenses $367,470.3 $384,466.4 $406,742.0 $22,275.6

GROSS SUBSIDY $93,840.9 $123,833.3$125,191.4 $1,358.1

Gross Subsidy $93,840.9 $123,833.3 $123,833.3 $1,358.1Less: Audit Adjustment 13,844.8 -13,166.0 -17,548.0 -4,382.0Plus Debt Service 27,484 27,484.2 27,484.2 0.0

Net Local Subsidy $135,169.9 $138,151.5 $1331769.5 -$3,023.9

Cost Recovery Ratio 74.5% 67.8% 69.2% 1.4%

Operating Budget -- Metrorail Financial TablesPage 64

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYMETRO~LBUDGETSUMMARY


Fjscal1999 Ejscal2QQQ Ejscal2QQ1 .c.biI.Dsm

Full-TIme Salaries 57,676.0 73,597.4 79.566.9 5.969.5Temporary Salaries 496.2 65.3 0.0 -65.3Part TIme Salaries 53.8 15.4 0.0 -15.4Salary Lapse 0.0 -2,294.7 -4,316.4 -2,021.7Overtime Salaries 5,086.5 3,106.8 3,786.2 679.4Salaries (Total) $63,312.5 $74,490.2 $79,036.7 $4,546.5Operator Wages 54,062.6 48,177.8 49,616.4 1,438.6Full TIme Wages 85,968.2 99,188.7 108,422.5 9,233.9Part TIme Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Temporary Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Wage Lapse 0.0 -1,601.3 -4,479.0 -2,877.7Overtime Wages 12,074.5 2,714.9 7,711.5 4,996.6Wages (Total) $152,105.3 $148,480.0 $161,271.4 $12,791.4TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $215,417.8 $222,970.2 $240,308.1 $17,337.9Fringe Benefits 51,841.7 56,537.4 56,321.5 -216.0Other Fringe Benefits 1,329.5 1,708.4 1,766.0 57.6Workers Compensation 4,114.6 2,956.2 2,756.2 -200.0Fringes (Total) $57,285.8 $61,202.0 $60,843.7 -$358.4

TOTAL PERSONNEL COST $272,703.5 $284,172.3 $301,151.8 $16,979.5

Management Fee 2,194.2 2,638.5 2,638.5 0.0Professional &Technical 12,243.8 7,025.5 7,700.6 675.1Temporary Help 573.9 717.1 833.6 116.5Contract Maintenance 5,114.7 9,276.7 11,502.0 2,225.3Custodial Services 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paratransit 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Other 1,888.2 2,281.5 3,757.3 1.475.8Services (Total) $22,014.8 $21,939.3 $26,432.0 $4,492.7Fuel and Lubricants 320.0 531.3 632.0 100.7Tires 53.0 67.0 74.6 7.6Other 28,108.8 30,565.5 28,197.7 -2.367.8Materials &Supplies (Total) $28,481.8 $31,163.8 $28,904.3 -$2,259.5Diesel Fuel 3.7 51.0 95.4 44.4Propulsion Power 26,994.5 29,799.8 27,566.4 -2,233.4Fuel &Propulsion (Total) $26,998.2 $29,850.8 $27,661.8 -$2,189.0Electricity and Gas 12,884.8 14,294.3 14,583.8 289.5Utilities - Other 2.214.4 2.284.3 2,308.9 24.6Utilities (Total) $15,099.3 $16,578.6 $16,892.7 $314.1Insurance 892.8 1.294.6 1.230.0 -64.6Claims 1.597.3 1,437.5 1,437.5 0.0Casualty & Uability (Total) $2,490.1 $2,732.1 $2,667.5 464.6Property 67.3 75.4 254.6 179.2Vehicles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Equipment 1,063.0 1,953.6 1,886.5 -67.1Leases (Total) $1,130.3 $2,029.0 $2,141.1 $112.1Dues And Subscriptions 185.0 202.6 221.7 19.1Conferences and Meetings 59.5 91.3 129.0 37.7Business Travel/Public Hrg 160.1 158.8 239.2 80.4Interview & Relocation 434.6 372.9 600.0 227.1Tolls 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Advertising 549.0 595.5 1.043.0 447.5Other 178.3 322.0 2,816.8 2,494.8Miscellaneous (Total) $1,566.4 $1,743.1 $5,049.6 $3,306.5Reimbursements -3,014.1 -2,742.6 -2,758.8 -16.2Reimbursements (Total) -$3,014.1 -$2,742.6 -$2,758.8 -516.2TOTAL NONPERSONNEL COST $94,766.8 $103,294.1 $106,990.2 $3,696.1Less: Preventive Maintenance .. -3,000.0 -1.400.0 1.600.0TOTAL METRORAIL COST $367,470.3 $384,466.4 $406,742.0 $22,275.6

"Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above


FISCAL 2001RAIL SERVICE ASSUMPTIONS

• 250 Weekdays, 58 Saturdays, 57 Sundays.

• Saturday Schedule - Holiday - July 4th, Columbus Day*, Veteran's Day*,

Martin Luther King's Birthday*, - President's Day*, (* Indicates 5:30AM Opening)

• Sunday Schedule - Holiday - Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day,New Year's Day, Memorial Day

• Base for budget is the June 25, 2000 schedule which includes the late openinguntil 2:00AM Fridays and Saturdays

• Convert three Orange Line trippers to six-cars for opening of new Vienna GarageJanuary 1, 2001

• Branch Avenue Service Extension:• Pre-revenue operation commences December 24, 2000• Revenue operation commences January 13, 2001• Station Manager pick effective January 7, 2001• Train/Consist Requirement: 12 Four-Car and 5 Six-Car Trains• Branch Avenue tail track used for overnight storage and reporting location for

station managers/train operators

• No Red Line expansion to Shady Grove

• Seasonal Operation to reflect current weekday and weekend car consists

• Mel Center car miles to reflect system growth to Branch Avenue


METRORAIL STATISTICSFor The Fiscal Years 1996 Through 2001

FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY1999 FY2000 FY 2001ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROVED APPROVED

STATISTICS:Total car Miles (OOOs) 44,823 43,408 48,790 50,394 50,835 56,399

Revenue Car Miles (OOOs) 43,403 41,988 47,190 48,794 49,700 54,799

Total Passengers (OOOs) 145,739 148,041 156,192 157,220 158,975 166,002

Total Passenger Revenue (OOOs) $ 222,681 $ 225,973 $ 242,129 $ 247,992 $ 238,940 $ 253,442

Total Operating Revenue (OOOs) $ 239,286 $ 244,469 $ 262,025 $ 273,629 $ 260,633 $ 281,551

Total Operating Net Expensese (OOOs) $ 334,130 $ 337,512 $ 353,509 $ 367,470 $ 384,466 $ 406,742

Total Opearting Assistance (OOOs) $ 94,844 $ 93,043 $ 91,484 $ 93,841 $ 123,833 $ 125,191

RATIOS:

Passengers Per Scheduled Car Mile 3.36 3.53 3.31 3.22 3.20 3.03

Cost Per Scheduled Car Mile $ 7.70 $ 8.04 S 7.49 $ 7.53 $ 7.74 $ 7.42

Rail Maintenance Parts Costs Per Mile $ 0.21 $ 0.21 $ 0.19 $ 0.14 $ 0.13 $ 0.13

~tPerPassenger $ 2.29 $ 2.28 $ 2.26 $ 2.34 S 2.42 $ 2.45

Average Passenger Fare $ 1.53 $ 1.53 $ 1.55 $ 1.58 $ 1.50 $ 1.53

Operating Assistance Per Passenger $ 0.65 $ 0.63 $ 0.59 $ 0.60 $ 0.78 S 0.75

Percentage of Operating Assistance to Cost 28.4% 27.6% 25.9% 25.5% 32.2% 30.8%

Percentage of Passenger Revenue to Total Cost 66.6% 67.0% 68.5% 67.5% 62.1% 62.3%

Percentage of Operating Revenue to Cost 71.6% 72.4% 74.1% 74.5% 67.8% 69.2%

Operating Budget -- Metrorail StatisticsPage 67

-00 WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYD)uRAIL SERVICE LEVELS(Qm

CD ..,

O>~ FISCAL YEAR 1999 THROUGH 2001OJ ::r

coOJ Rail Lines 1999 Year-End 2000 Year-End 2001 Year-Endcc-eoCD Red Line Glenmont/Shady Grove Glenmont/Shady Grove Glenmont/Shady Grove,....

Silver Spring/Grosvenor Silver Spring/Grosvenor Silver Spring/Grosvenor

s:CD Blue Line Addison Rd/Franconia-Springfield Addison Rd/Franconia-Springfield Addison Rd/Franconia-Springfield~~

0...,New CarrolltonNienna New CarrolitonNienna New CarrolltonNiennam Orange Line-

U>,...Yellow Line Huntington/Mt. Vernon Square Huntingotn/Mt. Vernon Square Huntingotn/Mt. Vernon Squarem

I""foC;;.d'. Green Line AnacostialU Street-Cardozo GreenbeltlAnacostia Greenbelt/Branch Avenuenen

Rush Hour TrainsRed Line 37 37 37Blue Line 21 21 21Orange Line 31 31 31Yellow Line 10 10 10Green Line

Anacostia to U St Cardozo 6Greenbelt to Farragut North 8Greenbelt to Anacostia 13Greenbelt to Branch Ave 17

Gap 7 7 7Start-UP 1 1 1

TOTAL 121 120 124

r l, I ,(I .;;.,.( ,. I - . ~ • t ~

Rail Lines 1999 Year-End 2000 Year-End 2001 Year-End0"C Cars Per Train Rush HoursCD-.

Red Line 37..6's 37-6'sQ) 37-6's~.

Blue Line 17-4's/4-6'8 17-4'8/4-6's 17-4's/4-6's:Jco

Orange Line 11 ..4's/20-6's 11-4l s/20-6's 84's/23-6's[Dc Yellow Line 10-4'8 10-4's 10-4'80-

Green LineceCD Anacostia to U St.lCardozo 6-4'8,....

Greenbelt to Farragut North a-6's

~ Greenbelt to Anacostia 13-4'sCD Greenbelt to Branch Ave 12-4'5/5-6'8,......,0.., Gap 7-6'8 7-6'5 7-6'8Q)

- Start-UP 1-4 1-4 1-4U> Ridership Pattern Adjustment - Fiscal 2000 5..2's 5-2'5,.....Q)

Ridership Pattern Adjustment - Fiscal 2001 5-2'sd".end". Cars Per Train Weekday Base/Nlght\)en Red Line (B) 4/4 4/4 4/4

Blue Line 4/2 4/4 4/4Orange Line (B) 4/4 4/4 4/4

Yellow Line 4/2 4/4 4/4

Green LineAnacostia to U St./Cardozo 2/2Greenbelt to Ft. Totten 2/2Greenbelt to Anacostia 4/4Greenbelt to Branch Ave 4/4

"'UQ.1coCD

mCD

Cars Per Train Saturday/SundayRed Line

Glenmont .. Shady Grove 4/4 4/4Silver Spring - Gorsvenor 4/2 4/4

Blue Line (A) 4/4 4/4Oragne Line (A) 4/4 4/4Yellow Line (A) 2/2Green Line

Anacostia to U St.lCardozo 2/2Greenbelt to Ft. Totten 2/2Greenbelt to Anacostia (A) 4/4Acacostia to Branch Ave (A)

(A) Saturday &Sunday Night, 2 Car Consist Is Utilized(8) During Peak Tourist Season, 6 Car Consist Utilized On Red Line (Silver Spring-Grosvenor), Orange Line

4/44/44/44/44/4

4/4

Rail Lines 1999 Year-End 2000 Year-End 2001 Year-End-000>-0

Peak Scheduled Rail CarscomCD .,

Red Line 222 222~~ 22205· Blue Line 92 92 92

(QOrange Line 164 164 170

(DYellow Line 40 40 40c

a. Green Line(0

<D Anacostia to U St.lCardozo 24,.....Greenbelt to Ft. Totten/Farragut North 48

~ Greenbelt to Anacostia 52m Greenbelt to Branch Ave 78r-+-,0~

m Gap 42 42 42

(J) Start-UP 4 4 4r-+ Ridership Pattern Adjustment - Fiscal 2000 10 10Q)r-+

Ridership Pattem Fiscal- Fiscal 2001iii",.....o·en Total Scheduled Car Requirement 636 626 658

Spares (20%) 128 126 132Revenue Collection 4 4 4

Total Car Requirement 768 756 794

Hourse of OperationWeekday 18.5 18.5 18.5Saturday 16 16 16Sunday 16 16 16

Days of OperationWeekday (1) 251 (1) 252 (1) 250Saturday (2) 57 (2) 57 (2) 58Sunday (3) 57 (3) 57 (3) 57

(1) Extended Service New Year's Eve.(2) Saturday Schedule - ** Columbus Day. ** Veteran's Day. **Martin Luther King's Birthday, **President's Day, 4th of July modified.(3) Sunday Schedule - Thanksgiving. Christmas. New Years Day. Memorial Day. Labor Day.

• I I ~ , I , I , t I I ;. •

Rail Lines 1999 Year-End 2000 Year-End 2001 Year-End0-c Rush Hour Headways (Minutes Between Trains)(1)...,

Red LineOJ,....::J Glenmont - Shady Grove 6 6 6

(CSilver Spring - Shady Grove 3 3 3m

Orange Line 6# 6# 6#ca. Blue Line 6 6 6coCD Yellow line 6 6 6,....

I Green LineI

s: Anacostia to U St./Cardozo 6CD Greenbelt to Farragut North 9,.......,0 Greenbelt to Anacostia 6.,Q) Aca~ostia to Branch Ave 6-en~ Non-Rush Hour • Mldday-Weekday/SaUSu" • Minytes Between Trainsm.....en" Red Line,.....

Glenmont - Shady Grove 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15o·(JJ Silver Spring • Gorsvenor 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15

Blue Line 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15Oragne Line 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15Yellow Line 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15Green Line

Anacostia to U St./Cardozo 12/12/15 12/12/15Greenbelt to Ft Totten 12/12/15 12/12/15Greenbelt to Anacostia 12/12/15Acacostia to Branch Ave 12/12/15

# During times of observed peaking in ridership tripper trains are operated.

RAIL CAR MILESFISCAL 2001

FISCAL 2000 FISCAL 2001

Red Line 19,409,626 21,074,812

Blue Line 8,939,916 9,504,308

Orange Lin 10,992,371 11,932,571

Yellow Line 2,987,752 3,430,277

Green Line ( Inner) 1,326,525 4,838,237

Green Line (Outer) 2,268,925

Mid-City Green 461,236 **

Enhanced Red Line 464,400

Branch Avenue Extension 1,489,608

MCI Arena 1,696,856 1,704,635

Ridership Pattern 650,000 325,000

Gap Trains 500,000 500,000

Sub-Total Revenue Miles 49,697,607 54,799,448

Start-Up/Breda Testing

Revenue Collection

Other

Total Car Miles

** Included in Green Line Above


200,000

700,000

700,000

51,297,607

200,000

700,000

700,000

56,399,448

RAIL OPERATORSPAYHOURSFISCAL 2001

FISCAL 1999 FISCAL 2000 FISCAL 2001ACTUAL APPROVED APPROVEP

Scheduled 663,789 782,118 799,398Start-up 12,356 9,408 18,426Interlocking 70,477 63,410 63,237Mid-City Green Line 3,516 (A)Enhanced Red Line 5,400Branch Avenue Extension 11,354

Subtoal Scheduled Pay Hours 746,622 863,852 892,415

Over Schedule 210,056 90,084 96,629Start-Up Overtime 3,321 3,485 3,485Standing Extra 194 800 800Branch Avenue ~,880 5,760Utility 56,022 47,044 46,844Training I Retraining 57,784 44,300 44,300Miscellaneous 7,105 5,700 5,700Funeral 2,410 1,413 1,413Vacation 97,429 111,622 111,622Sick 29,951 30,412 30,412Holiday 33,214 38,866 38,866

Subtotal Non-Scheduled 497,486 376,606 385,831

Total Pay Hours 1,244,108 1,240,458 1,278,246

t (A) Included in scheduled pay hours


RAIL OPERATORS yEAR END FISCAL 2001

SUBTOTAL ABSENT. TOTALWEEK SAI s.u.ti OPERATORS EElSM OPERATORS

ALEXANPRIAYARD 7 6 6GAP 3 3 4REVENUE 45 30 26TREASURY 2 0 0

SUBTOTAL 57 39 36 71 11 82

BRENTWOOPYARD 7 6 6GAP 2 0 0REVENUE 18 11 7

SUBTOTAL 27 17 13 32 6 38

NEW CARROLLTONYARD 7 6 6GAP 4 2 2REVENUE 34 27 22

SUBTOTAL 45 35 30 58 8 66

SHADY GROVEYARD 7 6 6GAP 2 2 2REVENUE 35 20 18

SUBTOTAL 44 28 26 54 8 62

GLENMONTYARD 6 6 6GAP 0 0 0REVENUE 22 12 11

SUBTOTAL 28 18 17 35 4 39

WEST FALLS CHURCHYARD 7 6 6GAP 2 2 2REVENUE 31 12 9

SUBTOTAL 40 20 17 47 7 54

GREENBELTYARD 6 6 6GAP 2 21 2REVENUE 31 16 14

SUBTOTAL 39 43 22 48 6 54

SYSTEM TOTALYARD 47 42 42GAP 15 11 12REVENUE 216 128 107TREASURY 2

TOTAL 280 181 161 345 50 395

START·UP 8TRAINING 8RETRAINING 8"UTJUTY 10BRANCH AVENUE 12

TOTAL 441


INTERLOCKING OPERATORS YEAR END FISCAL 2001

SUBTOTAL ABSENT- TOTALWEEK SAl SW3I. OPERATORS EEISM OPERATORS

ALEXANDRIA 3 3 3 4 1 5

BRENTWOOD 3 3 3 4 1 5

NEW CARROLLTON 3 3 3 4 1 5

GREENBELT 3 3 3 4 0 4

SHADY GROVE 3 3 3 4 1 5

GLENMONT 3 3 3 4 0 4

WEST FALLS CHURCH 3 3 3 4 1 5

SYSTEM TOTAL 21 21 21 28 5 33


Treasury

Revenue

Yard

Interlocking

Gap

Utility

Training

Retraining

Spares

Start-Up

Branch Avenue

TOTAL

RAIL OPERATOR REQUIREMENTSFISCAL 2001

2

261

64

33

19

10

8

8

49

8

12

474

SUMMARY OF OPERATOR REQUIREMENTSBY LOCATION

RAILOPERATORS INTERLOCKING TOTAL

New Carrollton 66 5 71

West Falls Church 54 5 59

Shady Grove 62 5 67

Brentwood 38 5 43

Greenbelt 54 4 58

Alexandria 82 5 87

Glenmont 39 4 43

Training 8 8

Retraining 8 8

Utility 10 10

Start-Up 8 8

Branch Avenue 12 12

TOTAL 441 33 474


STATION MANAGER PAY HOURSFISCAL 2001

EISCAl2000 FISCAL 2001

ScheduledMid City Green LineBranch Avenue

Subtotal Schedule Pay Hours

Unscheduled Overtime/Add') ServiceExtraboardUtilityTraining/Retraining/Recert.Mid-E TrainingBranch Ave TrainingMiscellaneous

Subtotal Revenue

VacationSickHolidayOther

Subtotal

TOTAL

736,14613,736

749,882

52,747800

10,20021,847

2,160

3,500

841,136

94,29231,65834,806

1,582

162,338

1,003,474

777,848 (A)(B)

18,675

796,523

52,747804

10,20021,884

3,516

885,674

95,86732,18735,209

1,589

164,852

1,050,526

(A) Based on schedules to be effective July 1, 2000(B) Included in scheduled pay hours


STATION MANAGER STAFFING REQUIREMENTSFISCAL 2001

Position Weekday Saturday Synday Iml Absenteeism

SHAPYGRQVE

Full Time 33 26 26 43 8 51Semi-Retiree 4 4 4

BRENTWOOPFull Time 39 28 28 50 7 57Semi-Retiree 3 3 3

WEST FALLS CHURCHFull Time 35 26 26 45 7 52Semi-Retiree 5 5 5

ALEXANDRIAFull Time 32 26 26 44 7 51Semi-Retiree 6 6 6

NEW CARROLLTONFull Time 49 38 38 63 9Semi-Retiree 5 5 5

GREENBELTFull Time 40 34 34 54 8 62Semi-Retiree 9 9 9

GLENMONTFull Time 25 20 20 35 5 40Semi-Retiree 4 4 4

SysrEM TOTALFull Time 253 198 198 334 51 385Semi-Retiree 36 36 36

Branch Ave. Full Time 21Branch Ave. Part Time 2Training 8Utility 3

TOTAL 455


WMATA PARK AND RIDEFY 2001 PROJECTED PARKING MANAGEMENT FEE

DISTRIBUTION BY STATION/CASHIER

STATIONILOT LOTREGION CAPMONTGOMERY COUNTYGrosvenor 639White Flint 991Twinbrook East 843Twinbrook West 255Rockville 538Shady Grove East #1 1,514Shady Grove East #2 515Shady Grove West 922Wheaton 971Forest Glen 588Glenmont 1,761Silver Spring 715Wheaton/Amherst 250

#of BASEl AVGTRANS FY 2001Days SURCHARGE %OFLOT PAY APPROVED

Collected FEE FEE CAPACITY MODE MGMTFEE

251 1.00 I 1.25 97.5% EXIT $27,826251 1.00 I 1.25 65.0% EXIT 79,502251 1.00 I 1.25 64.1% EXIT 79,502251 1.00 I 1.25 64.0% EXIT 39,751251 1.00 I 1.25 90.4% EXIT 31,801251 1.00 I 1.25 80.0% EXIT 68,326251 1.00 / 1.25 80.0% EXIT 27,826251 1.00 / 1.25 80.0% EXIT 55,651251 1.00 I 1.25 22.1% ENTRY 59,626251 1.00 I 1.25 81.2% EXIT 31,801251 1.00 I 1.25 88.5% EXIT 83,477

Monthly 30.00 / 20.00Monthly 30.00 I 20.00

Mont. Co. TOTAL 10,502 585,088

PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTYNew carrollton #1New carrollton #2New carrollton #3New Carrollton #4Landover SouthLandover NorthCheverlyAddison Road GarageCapitol HeightsGreenbeltCollege ParkPrince George's PlazaWest HyattsvilleSouthem AvenueNaylor RoadSuitlandBranch AvenueNew carrollton Gar.

P.G. Co. TOTAL

208357590793

1,185681530

1,268373

3,364530

1,068453

1,980396

1,8903,100

400

19,166

251 1.00 I 0.50 90.0% EXIT251 1.00 I 0.50 94.8% EXIT251 1.00 J 0.50 90.0% EXIT251 1.00 I 0.50 90.0% EXIT251 1.25 I 0.50 90.0% EXIT251 1.25 J 0.50 75.0% EXIT251 1.25 / 0.50 87.3% EXIT251 1.25 / 0.50 90.0% EXIT251 1.25 I 0.50 94.4% ENTRY251 1.25 I 0.50 74.1% EXIT251 1.25 I 0.50 100.0% EXIT251 1.25 I 0.50 90.0% EXIT251 1.25 I 0.50 64.4% EXIT251 1.25 I 0.50 30.0% EXIT251 1.25 I 0.50 30.0% EXIT251 1.25 I 0.50 30.0% EXIT251 1.25 I 0.50 30.0% EXIT

Monthly 30.00 I 10.00

27,82627.82627,82643,72655,65127,82627,82663,60119,875

143,10327,82655,65127,82612,3006,150

12,30030,750

637.888

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADeanwood 194Minnesota Avenue 333Rhode Island Avenue 342Fort Totten 408Anacostia 808

NO. VA - FAIRFAX &ARLINGTON COUNTIES, CITY OF ALEXANDRIAHuntington N. Gar. 1,281 251 1.00 I 1.25 88.0%Huntington S. Gar. 885 251 1.00 I 1.25 87.6%Huntington South 924 251 1.00 I 1.25 58.0%West Falls Church 1,064 251 1.25 I 1.00 86.1%Dunn Loring 1,319 251 1.00 I 1.25 86.4%Vienna #1 515 251 1.00 I 1.25 93.4%Vienna North Garage 1,865 251 1.00 J 1.25 89.1%Vienna #3 615 251 1.00 J 1.25 95.4%Vienna South Garage 2,187 251 1.00 I 1.25 89.5%Van Dom Street 361 251 1.87 J 0.38 89.0%East Falls Church 422 251 1.25 I 1.00 89.0%Franconia-Springfield 3,864 251 1.00 I 1.25 40.0%

D.C. TOTAL

No. VA TOTAL

TOTAL

2,085

15,302

47,055

251 2.00 /251 2.00 I251 2.00 I251 2.00 I251 2.00 I

92.0% ENTRY22.3% ENTRY97.4% ENTRY94.9% ENTRY90.0% EXIT

EXITEXITEXITEXITEXITEXITEXITEXITEXITEXITEXITEXIT

19,87519,87519,87519,87531,801

111,303

47,70163.60131,80163,60163,60131,80195,40231,80146,15831.80131,801

159,004

698.073

2,032,352

Carpool Parking Program

TOTAL

Operating Budget -- Metrorail Statistics

12.312

2.044,664

Page 79

This Page Not Used


, ,:

METRO ACCESS

• REVENUE

• EXPENSE

• STATISTICS

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Operating Budget -- Metro AccessPage 81


This Page Not Used

('

Paratransit ServiceFiscal 2001 Approved: $24.6 Million

Where it Comes FromGross Subsidy $23.3

Revenues $1.3

Where it GoesServices $23.6

~~~~::::1Supplies & Other $0.2

Personnel $0.8

$ Millions


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYREVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES· METRO ACCESS PARATRANSIT


Fjscal1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001 Change

REVENUESPassenger

Total Revenues$406.0$406.0

$538.5$538.5

$1,346.0$1,346.0

$807.5$807.5

EXPENSESPersonnelServicesMaterials & SuppliesFuel & Propulsion PowerUtilitiesLeases & RentalsMiscellaneous

Total Expenses

GROSS SUBSIDY

Gross SubsidyLess: Audit Adjustment

Net Local Subsidy

Cost Recovery Ratio

$433.3 $756.9 $791.2 $34.312,496.3 13,573.8 23,527.1 9,953.3

49.9 4.5 18.0 13.50.0 0.0 0.1 0.13.9 3.5 3.3 -0.20.0 0.3 200.7 200.4

15.0 5.2 57.8 52.6

$12,998.4 $14,344.2 $24,598.2 $10,254.0

$12,592.4 $13,805.7 $23,252.2 $9,446.5

$12,592.4 $13,805.7 $23,252.2 $9,446.50.0 2,039.0 21010.0 -29.0

$12,592.4 $15,844.7 $25,262.2 $9,417.5

3.1% 3.8% 5.5% 1.7%


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYMETRO ACCESS PARATRANSIT BUDGET SUMMARY



Full-TIme Salaries 281.0 601.1 676.2 75.1Temporary Salaries 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Part Time Salaries 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Salary Lapse 0.0 -4.2 -43.6 -39.4Overtime Salaries 9.1 0.2 0.2 0.0Salaries (Total) $290.1 $597.1 $632.8 $35.7Operator Wages 27.2 0.0 0.0 0.0Full Time Wages 10.6 7.2 5.3 -1.9Part TIme Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Temporary Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Wage Lapse 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 0.0Overtime Wages 22.1 0.4 0.4 0.0Wages (Total) $59.9 $7.5 $5.6 -$1.9TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $350.0 $604.6 $638.4 $33.8Fringe Benefits 83.3 152.3 152.8 0.5Other Fringe Benefits 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Workers Compensation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Fringes (Total) $83.3 $152.3 $152.8 $0.5

TOTAL PERSONNEL COST $433.3 $756.9 $791.2 $34.3

Management Fee 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Professional &Technical 48.7 108.1 91.0 -17.1Temporary Help 0.0 11.8 35.3 23.5Contract Maintenance 25.1 25.5 23.7 -1.8Custodial Services 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paratransit 12,400.2 13,384.0 23,273.2 9.889.2Other 22.2 44.4 103.9 59.5Services (Total) $12,496.3 $13,573.8 $23,527.1 $9,953.3Fuel and Lubricants 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Tires 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Other 49.9 4.5 18.0 13.5Materials &Supplies (Total) $49.9 $4.5 $18.0 $13.5Diesel Fuel 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1Propulsion Power 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Fuel & Propulsion (Total) $0.0 $0.0 $0.1 $0.1Electricity and Gas 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Utilities - Other 3.9 3.5 3.3 -0.2Utilities (Total) $3.9 $3.5 $3.3 -$0.2Insurance 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Claims 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Casualty & Liability (Total) $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0Property 0.0 0.0 200.0 200.0Vehicles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Equipment 0.0 0.3 0.7 0.4Leases (Total) $0.0 $0.3 $200.7 $200.4

Dues And Subscriptions . 0.5 0.5 1.4 0.9Conferences and Meetings 12.0 1.6 13.3 11.7Business Travel/Public Hrg 1.1 0.5 2.0 1.5Interview &Relocation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Tolls 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Advertising 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Other 1.4 2.6 41.1 38.5Miscellaneous (Total) $15.0 $5.2 $57.8 $52.6Reimbursements 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Reimbursements (Total) $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0

TOTAL NONPERSONNELCOST $12,565.1 $13,587.3 $23,807.0 $10,219.7

TOTAL METRO ACCESSS COST $12,998.4 $14,344.2 $24,598.2 $10,254.0


METROACCESS STATISTICSFor the Fiscal Years 1996 Through 2001

FY1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY2000 FY2001ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROVED APPROVED

STATISTICS:

Total Number of Registrants 6,305 8,856 10,396 13,850 15,136 15,936

Total Registrant Trips Requested 283,944 356,894 414,986 661,873 897,022 996,294

Contract Carrier· Number of Vehicles 45 51 62 76 80 139

Trips Transmitted to Core Carriers 116,010 130,565 152,619 136,643 148,365 102,804

Trips Completed by Contract Carriers 123,404 202,375 262,367 340,276 509,692 782,861


DEBT SERVICE

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Operating Budget -- Debt ServicePage 87


This Page Not Used

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 BUDGET SUMMARY

DEBT SERVICE

In December 1993, WMATA and the Federal government refinanced $997 million oftransitrevenue bonds issued in the 1970's for construction of the Metrorail Adopted RegionalSystem. The Authority refinanced its one-third share ($332.3 million) of the original bondissue by issuing $334,015,000 of gross revenue transit refunding bonds at varying couponrates ranging from 2.750/0 to 6.0%.

The terms of the new bond issuance are set forth in the Gross Revenue Transit BondRefunding Resolution and Official Statement. The bonds are tax exempt and are notsubject to the federal guarantee in effect on the original issuance. A bond fund has beenestablished comprised of a principal I sinking fund installment account and a separateinterest account. The bond fund is held in the custody of a trustee, Chemical Bank.Deposits of bond interest payments provided by local jurisdictions equal to one-fourth of$27,480,409 must be made into the bond fund on the first business day of each quarter.If the bond fund is not whole ten days after the beginning of the quarter, WMATA mustmake the fund whole by depositing funds from other income sources that are equal to theshortfall.

The payments required of the jurisdictions in fiscal 2001 will fund the folloWing:

Due to Bondholders 1/1/2001Due to Bondholders 7/1/2001

Applied to future payments

Principal$7,125,0007.285.000

$14,410,000

Interest$6,615,361

6.455.048$13,070A09

Total Due$13,740,361

13.740,048$27,480A09

3,785

Total jurisdictional debt service requirement $27.484,194

The debt service payments by the jurisdictions are pledged to the gross revenue transitrefunding bonds. The Authority's gross revenue receipts are subject to lien if the requiredpayments are not made into the bond fund. The full principal, interest and total annualdebt service requirements are displayed in the follOWing table.



DEBT SERVICE

Semi-Annual AmountPayment Date Principal Interest Payment Due

07/01/94 $4,060,000 $11,009,803 $15,069,803 $15,069,803($1 330.351)

$13,739.452 *01/01195 $5,540,000 $8,201,527 $13,741,52707/01/95 5.630.000 8,111.502 13,741,502 $27.483,02901/01/96 5,725,000 8,016,496 13,741.49607/01/96 5.825,000 7,912,014 13,737,014 27,478,51001/01/97 5,935,000 7,805.708 13,740.70807/01/97 6,050,000 7,689.976 13,739,976 27.480.68401/01198 6,165,000 7.572,001 13,737.00107/01198 6,295,000 . 7,445,618 13,740.618 27,4n.61901/01/99 6,485,000 7,256,768 13,741,76807/01199 6,620,000 7,117,341 13,737,341 27,479,10901/01/00 6,820,000 6,918,741 13,738,74107/01/00 6,970,000 6,768,701 13,738,701 27.4n.44201101/01 7,125,000 6,615,361 13,740,36107101/01 7,285,000 6,455,048 13,740,048 27,480,40901/01/02 7.450,000 6.291,136 13,741.13607/01/02 7,620,000 6,119,786 13,739,786 27,480,92201/01/03 7.795,000 5,944,526 13,739,52607/01/03 7,980.000 5,761,343 13,741,343 27,480,86901/01/04 8,165.000 5,573,813 13,738,81307/01104 8,360,000 5,3n,853 13,737,853 27,476,666

01101105 8,570,000 5,168,853 13,738,85307/01/05 8,780,000 4.958,888 13,738,888 27,477,74101/01106 8,995,000 4,743,n8 13,738,77807/01/06 9,220,000 4,518,903 13,738,903 27,4n,68101/01/07 9.450,000 4,288,403 13,738,40307/01107 9,685.000 4,052,153 13,737,153 27,475,55601/01108 9,980,000 3,761.603 13,741,60307/01/08 10,235.000 3,505,866 13,740,866 27.482.469

01/01109 10,540,000 3,198,816 13,738,816

07/01/09 10,810,000 2,928,728 13,738.728 27,477,544

01/01/10 11,135,000 2,604,428 13,739,428

07/01/10 11,420.000 2,319.094 13,739,094 27,478,522

01101/11 11,765,000 1,976,494 13,741,49407/01/11 12,070,000 1,667,663 13,737,663 27,479,15601101/12 12,390,000 1,350,825 13,740,82507/01/12 12,715,000 1,025.588 13.740,588 27,481,41201/01113 7,615,000 691,819 8,306,81907/01/13 7,405,000 491,925 7,896,925 16,203,743

01/01/14 5,660,000 297,544 5,957,54407/01/14 5,675,000 148,968 5,823,968 11,781,511

$334,015,000 $203,665,397 $537,680,397 $357,734,201

Outstanding

* Net of $1,330,351.14 accrued interest.


PROFESSIONAL ANDTECHNICAL SERVICES

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Operating Budget -- Professional and Technical ServicesPage 91

This Page Not Used



PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICE CONTRACTSFISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGET

IDOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

FY 2000 FY 2001OFFICE / ACCOUNT APPROVED APPROVED OPERATING CAPITAL PURPOSE

SECTAcct./Audit. consultants $150.0 $200.0 $200.0 WMATA annual and management audits.

COUNSpecial litigation-outside counsel 500.0 500.0 450.0 50.0 Use of outside counsel as needed basis.Eng./Arch. consultants 21.9 21.9 3.0 18.9 Adjudication of contract disputes, Army Corps of

Engineers Board of Contract Appeals.Witness & court fees 328.0 328.0 304.0 24.0 Court expenses (court reporting, witnesses, etc.).

SAFETransportation consultants 200.0 200.0 200.0 Safety experts and safety training.Other consultants 30.0 30.0 30.0 Technical experts.

MTPDEmployment/training 270.2 283.8 283.8 Police training.Medical consultants 12.0 12.0 12.0 Psychological services for new applicant testing.Other consultants 1.2 1.2 1.2 Polygraph examinations.

ACCTOther consultants 335.8 Data warehousing for financial reports.

FIMATransportation consultants 375.0 450.0 450.0 Metrobus passenger survey, management analysis.Computer consultants 187.0 200.0 200.0 Budget system improvements.Other consultants 48.0 10.0 10.0 Designing budget book.

TRESInvestment consultants 56.0 57.5 57.5 Financial advice on WMATA financial plan.Other consultants Bond fiscal agent.

RISKClaims adjusters 1,030.2 1,142.0 1,142.0 Settlement of worker's compensation claims.Other consultants 1,286.6 1,635.0 1,635.0 Insurance brokers,. worker's compensation support.Employment/training 24.0 24.0 Insurance related technical training.

BPADTransportation consultants 395.0 700.0 700.0 Customer satisfaction survey, new markets evaluation,

and service area usage & consumer awareness research.Other consultants 855.8 800.0 800.0 Business process reengineering studies, employee

satisfaction study and ITS evaluation.LAND

Real estate consultants 173.4 200.0 200.0 Joint development, appraisal, survey, marketingconsultants, land surveys.

OPERTransportation consultants 600.0 100.0 100.0 Operating and maintenance performance studies.

OPASEmployee training 175.0 175.0 175.0 Scarce skilled technical training.Transportation consultants 150.0 150.0 150.0 Formal technical apprenticeship program.

ENSPEng./Arch. consultants 500.0 400.0 400.0 Adjacent construction engineering evaluations.Other consultants 70.0 70.0 70.0 Energy management system & power rate

consultants.OENG

Eng./Arch. consultants 800.0 800.0 Facilities Maintenance Engineering Consulting services.Stray current surveying.

ADAPComputer service consultants 35.0 Modifications to Paratransit MIS software.Transportation consultants 78.0 Paratransit ridership study.Other consultants 80.0 80.0 Annual demand study to estimate ridership and

customer satisfaction study.


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYPROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICE CONTRACTS

FISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGET(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

FY 2000 FY 2001OFFICE / ACCOUNT APPROVED APPROVED OPERATING CAPITAL. PURPOSEBUSV

Other consultants 1.5 27.1 21.7 Evaluate quality control program.

BTRAOther consultants 101.5 101.5 Spot checkers for bus operations.

SYSPEng.lArch. consultants 30.0 Intelligent transportation system.Real estate consultants GIS I Ownership maps.

ADMNEmployee Training 30.0 16.0 15.6 0.4 Specialized training for staff development.Other consultants 75.0 61.4 7.6 Development and implementation of the Authority's

work place violence prevention program.ffSV

Employment/training 141.0 192.0 192.0 Training of staff on various computer system.Computer service consultants 257.0 400.0 400.0 Specialist support basic ordering agreement.

ODEVEmployment/training 919.9 1,257.4 1,139.7 111.7 Training for WMATA employees, in-house &. outside.Other consultants 120.0 118.0 2.0 Specialist to support HR software function.

PROCComputer Consultants 20.0 15.0 5.0 Support for PIMS system.Other consultants 340.0 360.0 360.0 Quality control program for quality checks on inventory

items.HRMP

Medical consultants 414.8 480.0 432.0 48.0 Four part-time physicians, misc. medical service.Other consultants 675.0 670.0 593.1 76.9 Actuarial services, performance appraisal, drug

testing.LASR

Other consultants 307.9 414.0 372.6 41.4 Labor legal services, arbitration, court reporting services.

CIVROther consultants 200.0 175.0 175.0 Technical assistance to DBE firms.

.COMOther consultants 450.0 200.0 200.0 Communications research and development,

MRELEmployment/training 2.0 2.0Other consultants 12.0 192.0 192.0 Media training for senior staff.

GOVROther consultants 75.0 175.0 115.0 Government legislative consultants.

STRKComputer service consultants 123.0 123.0 Web page design and maintenance. Metro system

route maps & Bus stop information.Other consultants 251.0 251.0 Sales commission for outsourcing Metrocheck.

CSCVComputer service consultants . 40.0 65.0 65.0 Upgrade ARTS &. data base.

TOTAL WMATA $11,758.2 $13,887.0 $13,320.1 $666.9


UNIONSTATISTICS

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Operating Budget - Union StatisticsPage 95

Operating BUdget - Union StatisticsPage 96

This Page Not Used

,.


UNION STATISTICS

The fiscal 2001 budget contains 9,419 authorized positions of which 84% or 7,908 aremembers of the five union locals on the property, representing employees looselycategorized by job function. Two of these locals represent the hourly wage work force, onelocal represents a portion of the professional and administrative work force, and two otherlocals cover the police and security positions. The remaining classifications ofadministrative and management employees are not covered by union contracts.

The following terms are widely used to describe the various unions and employees atWMATA:

Hourly (Wage) Employee Unions:Local 689 Amalgamated Transit Union, (except Landover hourly).Local 922 Teamsters Union at Landover Bus Garage.

Salary Employee Unions:Local 2 Office and Professional Employees International Union.Local 246 Teamsters representing Transit Police Officers.Local2246 Teamsters representing Special Police Officers.

Non-Represented Employees (Le., not represented by a union):Salaried positions in the management, administrative, supervisory orclericalwork force that have been exempted from union participation.

FY 2001Union Category Positions Distribution

Local 689 . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6,580 69.86%Local 922 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370. . . . . . . . .. 3.93%

Union Wage Subtotal .. 6,950 . . . . . . . .. 73.790/0

Local 2 622 . . . . . . . . .. 6.600/0Local 246 271 2.88°A,Local 2246 -2§ . . . . . . . . .. 0.69%

Union Salaried Subtotal .. 958 . . . . . . . . .. 9.860/0

Union Subtotal .. . . . . . .. 7,908 . . . . . . . .. 83.960/0

Non-Union 1,511 16.04%

Total Positions . . . . . . . .. 9,419 . . . . . . . . . . . 100%


Average Pay By Union Category:L-689 & L-922 $49,900L-2 $58,900L-246 $55,000L-2246 $31,500

IIPay" includes all base, progressions, overtime, vacation, sick, holiday, shift and differential pay.

Average Fringe Benefit Cost and Ratios by Position, for each Union:L-689 & 922 . . . . . . .. $11,900 per staff year or 230/0 of payL-2 $12,300 per staff year or 20% of payL-246 $19,400 per staff year or 37°t'o of payL-2246 . . . . . . . . . .. $6,600 per staff year or 230/0 of pay

"Fringe Benefits" include health insurance, retirement, payroll taxes, life and disability insurance.

Annual Average Pay by Job Category: . . . . . . . . .. Without FringeBus Operator (L-689 & L-922) $49,300Bus Mechanic (L-689 & L-922) $50,700Train Operator (L-689) $58,200Station Manager (L-689) $52,400Rail Mechanic (L-689) $52,900

* Non-Op (L-689 & L922) $49,400Salaried (L-2) $58,900Police (L-246) $55,000

Hourly Rates of Pay by Job Category: New Hire RateBus Operator (L689 & L922) $11.31Bus Mechanic (L689 & L922) $8.82Train Operator (L-689) $11.31Station Manager (L-689) $10.74Rail Mechanic $8.82

These are the hourly pay rates in effect at the beginning of the fiscal year.

With Fringe$60,600$62,400$71,600$64,500$65,100$60,800$70,700$75,400

Senior Rate$22.11$24.76$22.11$21.00$24.76

* Note: flOp" and "Non-Op" wage positions.The three position classifications ofBus Operator, Train Operator and Station Manager arereferred to as Op positions. They are budgeted based on the daily operating schedules forMetrobus and Metrorail. Bus Operator and Station Manager positions can be either fulltime or part-time.

Non-Op refers to any wage position other than Bus Operator, Train Operator or StationManager. Non-Op positions are budgeted by work location based on shift assignmentsand work levels at each facility in the Metro system.


FRINGE BENEFITS

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Operating Budget - Fringe BenefitsPage 99


This Page Not Used


FRINGE BENEFITS

Fringe benefit costs at WMATA comprise the normal business expenses incurred by anemployer that are above and beyond the cost of employee pay. WMATA's fringebenefits are comprised of the insurance and retirement plans required to attract andmaintain a large professional workforce, plus government mandated costs such asunemployment insurance, workers' compensation coverage and payroll taxes.

All fringe benefits at WMATA fall into one of three categories of cost. The first categoryis allocated fringe benefits, which are calculated on an Authority-wide basis and thencharged out to all offices and all modes for reporting purposes. Health insurance, lifeinsurance, and pension costs are all examples of allocated fringe benefits. These fringebenefit expenses are allocated to each office based upon the budgeted payroll peroffice and then allocated by mode based on the budgeted payroll by mode. The fiscal2001 total budget for allocated fringe benefits is $113.7 million.

Second, unallocated fringe benefits (also referred to as "other" fringe benefits) arebudgeted by office in amounts specific to the needs of each office. These "other"fringes are typically things such as meal reimbursements for employees working beyondtheir regular hours, tool allowances and costs for work uniforms. Detail on the $3.4million fiscal 2001 total for this expense is made available in each office budget wherethis cost occurs.

The third category of fringe benefit expense is workers' compensation cost. The fiscal2001 budget requirement of $5.6 million is largely determined by actuarial analysis andgovernmental requirements. This line item expense is budgeted in the Office of RiskManagement.

In total for fiscal 2001, fringe benefit costs are:

Allocated Fringe BenefitsOther Fringe BenefitsWorkers' CompensationTotal Fringe Benefits

Operating Budget - Fringe Benefits

$113,739,8003,421,3005.635,800

$122.796,900

Page 101


PERSONNEL AND FRINGE BENEFITS BY UNION

AFLoCIO Local 246 Local 2246 AFLoClOOPIEU Transit Special SALARY ATU Teamsters HOURLY AUTHORITY

Non-llnion Local·2 Police Police TOTAL Local-689 Local·922 TOTAL TOTAL

POSITIONS:Full Time 1,511 615 271 65 2,462 6,297 303 6,600 9,062Part Time 0 7 nla nla 7 283 67 350 357

1,511 622 271 65 2,469 6,580 370 6,950 9.419

FULL·TIME EQUIVALENTS:Full Time 1,512.39 645.10 271.00 65.00 2,493.49 6,247.92 300.00 6,547.92 9,041.41Part Time 0.00 3.50 0.00 0.00 3.50 138.24 33.50 171.74 175.24

1,512.39 648.60 271.00 65.00 2,496.99 6,386.16 333.50 6,719.66 9,216.65

PAYROLL COSTS:Full Time Pay $96,256,139 $37,066,801 514,787,103 $2,005,109 $150,115,152 $314,943.421 515,448,439 $330,391,860 $480,507,012Part Time Pay $127,500 $127,500 $6,885,500 S1,286,500 $8,172,000 $8,299,500Overtime Pay $1,255,800 $2,686,704 $1,079,300 $109,900 $5,131,704 $15.004.311 $264,037 $15,268,348 $20.400,052

Less: Turnover Savings ($5,118,300) ($1,971,000) ($786,300) ($106,600) (S7,982,167) ($7.234.874) ($165,411) ($7.400,285) ($15.382.452)Budgeted Payroll S92,393,639 537,910.005 $15,080,103 52.008,409 $147,392.189 $329,598.358 $16.833,565 $346.431,923 $493,824,112

ALLOCATED FRINGE BENEFITSBudgeted By Position:

CIGNAPPO 54,771,000 $1.807.400 $6,578,400 $6,578.400Kaiser Permanente $1,992,800 51,001.300 $156,100 $3,150,200 SO $3,150,200

GW Health Plan $678,300 5377,800 $79,700 $1,135,800 $0 $1,135.800Blue Cross $206,900 $1.862,100 $2,069.000 $0 $2,069,000

Health Trusts $0 $44,509,700 $2,379,200 $46,888,900 546,888,900Dental $315,100 $132,600 $30,100 $477,800 $0 $477,800

Retiree Health $1,814,800 $747,000 $2.561,800 $4,538,000 $250.800 $4,788,800 $7,350,600Health Insurance 59,778,900 $4,066,100 $1.862,100 $265,900 $15,973,000 549,047,700 $2,630.000 $51,677,700 $67,650,700

Budgeted By Payroll:FICA Taxes $6,652,300 $2,729.500 $1,085.800 5153.600 S10,621,200 $25,049,500 $1,279,400 $26,328,900 $36.950,100

Defined Benefit Pensions SO SO $2,314,200 $0 $2,314,200 $0 S1.262,500 $1,262,500 $3,576,700Defined Contribution Pensions $819,000 $336,000 $1.155,000 $1,155,000

Life Insurance $434,000 $180,700 $93,700 $8,200 $716,600 $0 $716,600Long Term Disability $548,500 $237,000 $1,800 59,300 $796,600 $2.472,000 $2,472,000 $3,268.600

Accident Insurance $0 $15,100 $6.300 $700 $22,100 $0 $22,100Unemployment $74,800 $30.700 $12,200 $1,600 $119,300 $267.100 $13,600 $280,700 $400,000

Taxes I Pension I Other $8,528,600 $3,529,000 $3,514,000 $173.400 $15,745,000 527,788,600 $2,555,500 $30.344,100 $46,089,100

ALLOCATED FRINGE BENEFITS $18,307,500 $7,595,100 $5,376,100 $439,300 $31.718,000 $76,836,300 $5,185.500 $82.021,800 $113,739,800

Unallocated Fringe Benefits S548,800 $225,900 $98.400 $23,600 $896,700 $2.390.100 $134,400 $2,524,500 $3,421,300Workers' Compensation $1,054,400 $432.700 5172.100 $22,900 $1,682,100 $3,761.600 $192,100 $3,953,700 $5.635,800

TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS: $122.796,900

Allocated Fringe BenefitsBudgeting Rates:

Average Annual Pay 561,100 $58,400 $55,600 $30,900 $59.000 $51,600 $50,500 $51.600 $53.600Full Frinae Rate 20% 20% 36% 22% 22% 23"1. 31% 24% 23%Variable Cost on Pavroll 10.4% 10.5% 24.4% 9.8% 11.8% 9.60/. 16.3% 9.9% 10.5%Fixed Cost Per F.T.E. $6,500 S6,300 $6,900 $4.100 $6,400 $7,700 $7,900 $7,700 $7,300


INFRASTRUCTURERENEWALPROGRAM

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Infrastructure Renewal ProgramPage 103

Infrastructure Renewal ProgramPage 104

This Pa~e Not Used

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 • 2006 INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM

OVERVIEW

The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority maintains and operates the secondlargest rail and fourth largest bus system in America, measured in terms of ridership.Metro provides intermodal bus and rail transportation for residents ofthe metropolitan areaas well as visitors to the nation's capital from across the country and around the world.A sizable capital investment has been made by Federal, state and local governments toprovide such a system and care must be taken to ensure that this investment is maintainedto the highest standard so that it continues to provide safe, clean, reliable, and comfortableservice.

The adopted Fiscal 2001 - 2006 Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP) has beendeveloped to reflect several changes that have occurred within the last year. The programexcludes any system expansion element, and provides only a limited amount of systemenhancements as assets are replaced, thus the name IRP truly reflects the nature of theprogram. The program is consistent with the Inter-jurisdictional Funding Agreementthrough fiscal 2003, Board Guidance and the Independent Consultant's recommendations.The fiscal 2001 program is approved for implementation and the fiscal 2002-2006 programis approved for planning purposes.

The program is driven by the need to rehabilitate and replace rolling stock which accountsfor 720/0 of the funds required in the approved fiscal 2001 program. Major projectsapproved in fiscal 2001 include the procurement of rail cars, the rehabilitation ofthe Bredacars, the continuing need for escalator overhaul and elevator rehabilitation, theacceleration of escalator canopy installation, station enhancement and parking lotrehabilitation. New projects include the lease/purchase of the Pennsy Drive Facility tomeet maintenance and training needs, and the inclusion of Information Technologyprojects under one focused program. The Emergency Rail Rehabilitation Program(ERRP), adopted by the Board on April 22, 1999 continues in it's second year. This planwill reduce passenger off-loads and delays, stabilize critical system components, addresstargeted facility deficiencies that are highly visible to customers and ensure that the coresystem can adequately support future growth.

FUNDING LEVELS

The funding for the adopted Fiscal 2001 - 2006 CIP totals $1,495 million, includingfinancing. This reflects the levels of funding contained in the program approved by theBoard last year, additional Federal funds, $24.9 million from prior years reprogrammed

Infrastructure Renewal Program -- OverviewPage 105

funds in fiscal 2001 and the one year extension through fiscal 2006. The sequencing ofthe projects results in obligations and expenditures exceeding available funding in someyears. To accommodate this, the program includes the use ofa loan guarantee up to $600million under the Transportation Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act of 1998(TIFIA). The Board is currently re-examining the out-year funding needs of the IRP inFiscal 2006 and beyond, the projected ridership increases, the required vehicles and thefacilities needed to accommodate this growth from fiscal 2001-2025. These findings willbe considered dUring the preparation of the next IRP.

Infrastructure Renewal Program -- OverviewPage 106

FY 2001 - 2006Funding and Requirements

:J~""'1Q)enr-+..,C(")rlC...,CD

:JJCD::lCD~Q)

"U..,o

CO..,m3

Fundingby Fund Source

Reguirementsby CateQQ.Q!

System $103.5 ---7

PassengerFacil ities $210.1------1'

""U0)

coCD

o""

ITotal $1494.91$ in millions

ITotal $1494.91

;'Chart 1

FY 2001Funding and Requirements

Rolling Stock -Rail $445.4W.----~--

PassengerFacilities $39.4

System $37.2

If\ InformationLTechnology$22.9

Rolling Stock -Bus $44.5

Tracks &Structures $13.4

Requirementsby Category

Program Management Jand Support $4.2

Fundingby Fund Source

--ow :::JCO=:'CD Q)

en~,.....

02000,...

c-,CD

:D.CD:::J(1)

:EQ)

"'U-,oco..,Q)

3

1Total $677.31 ITotal $677.31

$ in millions1<,' - .;

i'::'(~hart>2 .~. .

:::J TABLE NO. 1-t..

FY 2001 • 2006...,Q)en.......,C

Pro ram be ond FY 06 Is for Information onl0rl DEstRU~tioN FY01 FV02 FY03 FY04 FYOS FY06 TOTAL. FY07 FY08 FY08 ::FY10'- TOTAL TOTALC.., FY01008. FY01·10 FY01..10CD

:n ROLLING STOCK: BUS

CDBUS REPLACEMENT 34.270 20,843 21.328 38,386 20.38D 19,543 152.548::::J 152,548

CD

~TOTAL 34,270 20,643 21.328 38,386 20.380 18.543 152,148 43780 38,389 51.882 57,922 188883 342,511

OJ

"'0ROLLIHG STOCK: RAIL

..,EMERGENCY RAIL REHABILITATION 10,300 2,5000 3,800 0 0 0 18,800 16.800

CO RAILCAR ENHANCEMENTS 1,858 1,858 897 484 484 0 5,337 5,337~ RAIL CAR PURCHASE 24,000 0 0 0 0 ° 24,000 24,000Q) RAIL CAR REHABIUTATION 398.2;2 ~~

___0_ ___0_ 0 409,230 409,2303

TOTAL 434,448 11.125 8,888 484 484 0 455.167 3393 ----!.!!!..~ ----l.lli.... 22648 477,815

::n PASSENGER FACIU11ES::JQ) ESCALATOR REHABIUTATIONIMAINTENANCE 6,783 37,823 t10 14,727 11,736 11,500 83.259 83,259::::J ELEVATOR REHABIUTATION 2,257 749 748 749 749 1,700 8,953 8,9530 ESCALATOR CANOPIES 8,230 8,500 8,500 0 0 0 26,230 28,230OJ STAnONENHANCEMENTPROGRAM 8,324 4,817 4.808 4,906 4.808 4,900 32,759 32.759

PARKING lOT REHABIUTATION 8.608 6,243 4,130 4,646 2.894 3,033 27,654 27.654-i MECHANICAL SYSTEMS REHABILITATION ----!J!!...~~~ 5.807 5.720 33.228 33,228D)

0- TOTAL 39,356 62,887 24,173 30.522 ~ 28,853 210,083 34136 ~ 29,930 ~ 129757 339,840

CD(JJ

MAINTENANCE FACILITIES

RAIUBUS STRUCT. FIELD BASES. YARDS &SHOPS 13.907 7,333 7,333 7.333 7.333 7.380 50,829 50,629REPAIRABLES 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 30,000BUSIRAIL SUPPORT eQUIPMENT 7,981 9,851 10,731 10,852 10,851 11.000 61,146 61,148SOUTHEAST BUS GARAGE 3,985 247 247 247 0 0 4,728 4.728PENNSY DRIVE FACILITY 38.000 0 0 0 0 0 38,000RAIL WORK EQUIPMENTILOCOMOTIVES ~~~~~ 4.205 23,342 23,342

TOTAL 70,341 25.819 ~ 27,491 -.!!m... 27.595 205,843 22.843 26,583 25,854 28,145 103935 308,778

SYSTEMS

COMPREHENSIVE RADIO SYSTEM 1,124 2.000 0 0 0 0 3,124 3.124ATC AND POWER SYSTEMS REPLACEMENT 11,555 9,854 10,794 10,448 9,923 10.100 82.474 62,474UPSlElECTRICAL SYSTEMS REHABIUTATlON 2,804 2,584 2,598 2.504 2,440 2.410 15,140 15,140BUS FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM REPLACEMENT ~ ----!!!.. ___0_ ___0_ ___0_ 0 22.785 22.185

-UTOTAL 37,185 ~ 13,392 ~~ 12.510 103.533 24538 ~ 32.262 35.861 123775 227,308m

CCCD~

0CD

-u- TABLE NO.1Q) ::J(Q~ FY 2001 • 2006mOl

CI)-ol .-+..,-ole:

00 Pr ram be ond FY 06 Is for Information onl.-+

DESCRIPTION .FY.01 FYI2 FY03 FY04 FYO~,.:f\; FY08. .;TOTAL FY07' FY08 " FYOO' ·j:y~10 '_TOTAL T()TALe"'01-08

' .FY07~10 Pfoi:io~

CD

::JJCD TRACK AND STRUCTURES::Jen ROWTRACK AND STRUCTURES REHABIUTATION 11,592 12,938 8,376 8,376 8,376 8,300 57,958 51,958

~ STATION lUNNEL LEAK MmGATION ~~~~ 1,834 1.800 10,970 10,870

Q)TOTAL 13,428 14,772 ~~ 10,210 10,100 88,828 22528 23.288 ~ 28,745 100778 169,708

-U....,0 INFORMA1l0N TECNNHNOLOGY 1mco..,

INFORMAnoN TECHNOLOGY 22,126 17,755 ~~ 8,328 3.018 80.541 60,141Q)

3 TOTAL 22.928 11.755 ~~ 8,328 3,018 80,541 4758 ----M!!....~ ----!.!!L 17B90 78,431

JJ::sQ) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT &SUPPORT::J0oi' PROGRAM ADMINISTRAnON 2,700 2,800 3,200 3,60D 4.000 4,000 20,400 20,400

CONSULTANT AND ENGINEERING (IAWP) 11 ___0_~~~ 8,000 8,000 41.000 41,ODO

-fOJ TOTAL ~ 10.900 12.200 ~ 12,000 12,000 61,400 14433 --.!!J!!!... 17.493 ~ 61168 128,568c-CD PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ~ 20,700 20,700 20,700 20,700 20,700 124,815 124.815en

TOTAL 21,115 20.700 20,700 20.700 20,700 20,700 124.615 20700 20,700 20,700 20,700 82800 207.415

FINANCiNG COSTS

TOTAL ~ 8.700 11,400 13,800 13,600 5,200 52,200 7490 ----L!!!... ----!.!!L~ 21309 73.509

GRAND TOTAL PROJECTS 877,267 208.532 155,572 188,404 151,564 137,518 1,414,858 188,615 203.416 218,782 241,150 860,023 2.354.881

PROJECTED FUNDING WITHOUT FINANCING 21 195,855 191,100 215.100 240,100 285,100 285,100 1,372,455 265100 285,100 285,100 285,100 1080 00 2.432.855

FINANCING (PAYBACK) 481,312 15.432 (58,528) -!!!.!!!l. (113,538) (127.IB1) 122.403 6e425 ~ (48,318) (23.950) 00377 (71.914) 31

Notes:1/IAWP estimate for Fiscal 2001 of $18.1 miJlion has been allocated and induded in the above projects,2J FY 2001lndudes additional runds or$24.9 million from reprogrammed funds.31 ThIs amount will be applied as payback for Fiscal 2000.

I , ,

~ WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY~-, TABLE NO.2Q)en FUNDING PROJECTIONS FOR FISCAL 2001·20061RPr-+-,

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)c(")r-+C-,

FY02 FY05 FY06 TOTALS

ilFY01 FY03 FY04

(FED 00) (FED 01) (FED 02) (FED 03) (FED 04) (FED 05)

TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET WITHOUT FINANCING 195.955 191,10~ 215,100 240,100 265,100 265,100 1,372.455CD~~I TO BE FUNDED BY:

-0O. REPROGRAMMED FUNDING 24,944 24.944co-,

!I SECTION 5307 FEDERAL GRANTS 78.782 78.924 84,803 90.738 90.738 90,738 514,723

20% LOCAL MATCHING CONTRIBU'nON FOR SECTION 5307 GRANTS 19,696 19,730 21.200 22,684 22,684 22,684 128.678

::J

~ . SECTION 5309 RAIL MODERNIZATION GRANTS 44,654 53,558 61,599 70,628 70,628 70,628 311,695(")

iii-. 20% MATCHING CONTRIBUTION FOR SECTION 5309 GRANTS 11,164 13,390 15,400 17,651 11.651 11,651 92,925-IW

2:. BUSIRAIL REHABILITATION INTERNALLY GENERATED FUNDS 1,500 1,500 1.500 1,500 0 0 6,000CDen

ILOCAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR REPAIRABLE PARTS ACCOUNTS 5,000 5.000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000

ADDITIONAL LOCAL FUNDING 2,161 10,944 11,544 23,839 50,339 50,339 155,166

FEDERAL TEA·21 FLEXIBLE FUNDING (OR EQUIVALENT) _.8.0~ .1.054 8,054 8,054 8,054 8,054 48.324

TOTAL PROJECTED FUNDING AVAILABLE WITHOUT FINANCING 195.955 191,100 215,100 240,100 285,100 265.100 1,372,455

FINANCING/(PAYBACK) ~'I.31Z 15.432 (59,528) (73,696) (113,536) (127,581) 122,403

"U . TOTAL PROJECTED AVAILABLE FUNDING WITH FINANCING 877,287 208,532 155,572 186,404 151,564 137,519 1.494.858Q)

coCD................-oJ.

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAMFY 2001 • 2006

PROJECT TITLE: Bus Procurement

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the replacement of older buses and will ensure safe and continuedservice to the Washington Metropolitan Area. Fiscal 2001 funds the replacement ofapproximately 100 forty foot buses.

JUSTIFICATION:

The current average age of the WMATA bus fleet is 6.6 years. FTA's new busspecifications suggest a bus average age of 6 years with a bus life expectancy of 12 years.However, a mid-life bus overhaul program is extending the life of Metrobuses to 15 years.This will allow for a reduction in new bus procurements, while maintaining a bus fleet thatis efficient and provides a high level of service to customers.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

$ In Thousands ITotal: $152,548 I

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYOS FY06

Infrastructure Renewal Program -- Project DescriptionsPage 112


PROJECT TITLE: Emergency Rail Rehabilitation Program

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds acceleration of rail car reliability and major maintenance programs.Included in the program are accelerated major maintenance and interim rehabilitation ofrail friction brakes, rail car doors, car bodies, wayside equipment, communications, rail carcouplers, HVAC systems, battery systems and propulsion systems. Also included areengineering action teams to focus on resolving rail car problems, accelerating maintenanceand rehabilitation activities, supporting resolution ofcritical ATC issues and identifying andresolving train control vital relay issues. This project will also fund acceleration of theBreda rehabilitation program, consolidation of a seven year floating slab repair programinto four years and additional maintenance efforts on escalators. Fiscal 2001 funds thecontinuation of rail car rehabilitation, engineering, and core capacity studies.

JUSTIFICATION:

In 1999, operational issues on Metrorail highlighted the need to advance criticalmaintenance projects that will address performance related problems. The Board directedthat the General Manager prepare a plan in response to the current emergency onMetrorail that identified the most urgently needed repairs that could significantly correct andimprove the reliability of the rail system. This plan was approved by the Board on April 22,1999. This plan includes immediate, near-term and longer term elements to maximizerapid implementation in a way that will contribute to tangible and immediate benefits for railoperations while addressing other issues that could affect future system performance.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $16,600Sin Thousands

FYD1 FY02 FYD3o

FY04

oFYD5

D

FYD8



PROJECT TITLE: Rail Car Enhancements

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the retrofit or replacement of rail car related equipment that will improvethe accessibility, safety, diagnostic capability, maintenance, appearance and reliability ofthe rail car fleet.

JUSTIFICATION:

Recent technological advances in rail crash worthiness, accessibility and diagnosticcapabilities have made it possible to improve the performance of the existing rail car fleet.Fiscal 2001 funds inter-car barriers.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $5,337$In Thousands

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05o

FY06



PROJECT TITLE: Rail Car Purchase

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the purchase of additional rail cars in Fiscal 2001 to meet estimatedridership levels.

JUSTIFICATION:

This is the first purchase of rail cars in the Infrastructure Renewal Program. The cars areneeded to meet planned passengervolumes in the 103 mile system when the last segmentto Branch Avenue is opened in early 2001. Without these cars, a shortage would exist andcause challenges in meeting scheduled service.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $24,000$ In Thousands

24,000

o o o o o

Infrastructure Renewal Program -- Project Descriptions·Page 115

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAMFY 2001 - 2006

PROJECT TITLE: Rail Car Rehabilitation

DESCRIPTION:

This project will enhance rail car reliability with the mid-life overhaul of 364 Breda carsincluding propulsion, brake, door controls, signs, interior, truck, heating, ventilation and airconditioning, lighting, communications, high voltage and control cables systems/equipment.Fiscal 2001 funds the award of the four year Breda overhaul contract.

JUSTIFICATION:

The Breda car overhaul includes the replacement ofthe DC propulsion system with an ACdrive system which will result in lower maintenance costs for the remaining life of the cars.Substantial power savings may be derived from the regenerative braking system. Inaddition, the friction brake hydraUlic, pneumatic and electronic control systems and doorsystem components are nearing the end of their useful life. This rehabilitation must beperformed to avoid the additional maintenance caused by worn out parts and electricalsystem degradation.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

$ In ThousandsI Total: $409.230 I

FY01 FY02

&.489

FY03

oFY04

oFYOS

oFY08


INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAMFY 2001· 2006

PROJECT TITLE: Escalator Rehabilitation/Maintenance

DESCRIPTION:

This project provides funding for the following:

• escalator maintenance,• escalator rehabilitation.

These projects will fund the maintenance and the rehabilitationlreplacement of escalators.A contract will provide funds for escalator work at 21 stations. The escalator rehabilitationincludes the rehabilitation and code upgrade of the Westinghouse modular escalatorsbeginning with the oldest and poorest performing equipment in the highest use stations,the installation of a comb plate and impact detectors, the relocation of emergency stopswitches, and the installation of equipment to automatically report all escalator faults to themaintenance control center. Fiscal 2001 funds contract maintenance labor and materialrequired to maintain the escalators at 70 stations, and the rehabilitation of 26 escalatorsin 10 stations.

JUSTIFICATION:

The escalator overhaul/rehabilitation program is the result of a detailed staff investigation,system wide inspection effort and contractor study to identify needed enhancement andrehabilitation to prevent deterioration and to improve the reliability and safety of theescalator system.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $83,259

$ In Thousands

37.623

FY01 FY02

910

FY03 FY04 FYO& FY08



PROJECT TITLE: Elevator Rehabilitation

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the rehabilitationlreplacement of WMATA elevators. It includes threeelements. 1) The rehabilitation ofthe elevators that have exceeded their useful life or havedeteriorated beyond economic repair. This element includes: durable stainless steel cabs,enhanced ventilation systems, installation of energy efficient fluorescent light fixtures,refurbished elevator housings and sill structures, and installation of state-of-the-artcontrollers and motor systems. The integrity of hydraulic pistons and cylinders will betested and replaced as required. 2) Upgrade of 110 elevators in key stations to bring theunits into conformance with current ADA requirements. 3) The installation of equipmentto automatically report all elevator faults to maintenance control. Fiscal 2001 funds therehabilitation of 11 elevators in 6 stations, the beginning of the exception reporterinstallation on 83 elevators and the ADA upgrade on 60 elevators.

JUSTIFICATION:

Normal and abnormal use, as well as vandalism has caused the deterioration of elevatorsin the rail system. Elevator rehabilitation ofmajor systems must be accomplished becauseof high failure rates which result in elevator downtime. The modernization effort must alsobe accomplished to assure that system elevators meet ADA code requirements and thatall equipment failures are identified, promptly reported and addressed.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $6,953S In Thouaanda

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYO& FY08



PROJECT TITLE: Escalator Canopies

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds design and installation of canopies with lighting at various locations.Included in the project will be waterproofing and repair of structures surrounding exteriorescalators. Approximately 53 escalators are exposed to the elements and will be coveredby canopies over the next several years.

JUSTIFICATION:

Covering outside escalators will reduce maintenance to escalators due to weatherdamageand minimize customer complaints.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

$In ThousandsI Total: $26.230 I

FY01 FY02 FY03o

FY04o

FY06o

FY08



PROJECT TITLE: Station Enhancement Program

DESCRIPTION:


• station sign initiative,• station enhancements,• customer communication initiative.

This project funds the upgrade of existing signage at Metrorail facilities and theenhancement and restoration of rail stations. This project includes the rehabilitation,replacement and installation ofconcrete structures, granite edge stones, paverquarry tiles,sidewalks, elastomeric roof coatings, metal gratings, stairwells, stairways, platformshelters, doors, hatches, exterior lighting, station signage and graphics. Fiscal 2001 fundsmajorand mini enhancements at 14 rail stations and the procurement of variable messagesigns, bus route maps and vending machines.

JUSTIFICATION:

The station structures are aging and must be rehabilitated. Vaulted ceiling spalling anddeteriorated concrete has to be repaired to maintain structural integrity. Surface stationelastomeric roofing replacement is necessary to prevent accelerated deterioration. Stationwalkways must be maintained to provide an adequate and safe environment for ourpatrons. Station signage renewal is needed to ensure patron information is clear and welldesigned. Enhanced customer communications continues to be a priority.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $32,759 I$ In Thousands

8,324



PROJECT TITLE: Parking Lot Rehabilitation

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the rehabilitation of asphalt pavement, curbs, curbs/gutter, andsidewalks; drainage systems, signage, electrical wiring/conduits, pavementmarking/striping, structures, station access roadways/bus bays, and parking lot equipmentsuch as lot full signs and cashier booths.

JUSTIFICATION:

The parking facilities are deteriorating due to weathering and normal wear and tear. Someof the facilities have been in operation for over 24 years. The asphalt paving, concretesidewalks/roadways, and bus loops have deteriorated and require rehabilitation in orderto maintain safe and reliable service. Parking facilities/equipment requires periodicrehabilitation to ensure safety of operation and reliability of revenue collection.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $27,654

$ In Thousands

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYO& FYOI



PROJECT TITLE: Mechanical Systems Rehabilitation

DESCRIPTION:

This project prOVides funding for the following:

• station and tunnel rehabilitation,• fire system rehabilitation,• station chiller rehabilitation,• drainage pumping/sewer rehabilitation.

These projects include rehabilitation and replacement ofaging and deteriorated equipmentincluding ventilation equipment, standpipes and sprinklers, and electrical systems. Fiscal2001 activities include the replacement of 4 chillers, cooling towers, drainage pumpingstations, and the installation of ventilation equipment.

JUSTIFICATION:

It is vital to replace tunnel ventilation systems, meet National fire code mandates requiringinstallation ofnewfire suppression systems, and to maintain mechanical systems to ensurethat passengers are transported in safe and comfortable conditions.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $33,228

$ In Tbousands

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FYOB



PROJECT TITLE: Rail/Bus Structures, Field Bases, Yards and Shops

DESCRIPTION:


• environmental assessment,• emergency construction,• rail structures, field bases, yards and shops.

These projects include design, installation, replacement and upgrade of equipment toensure environmental regulatory compliance of bus and rail facilities, the continuation ofemergency repairs and other construction/improvements, and a variety of rehabilitation tofacilities including masonry, door replacement, sidewalk and roadway repairs, and roofreplacement. Fiscal 2001 funds emergency construction and repair, procurement ofpollution control equipment, paving, storage tank replacement and water separatorreplacement.

JUSTIFICATION:

The replacement of equipment is necessary to meet regulatory standards and ensuretimely repairs to facility roofs, roadways, and interiors to maintain a safe environment foremployees and to protect vital equipment.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $50,629

$ In Thousands

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYOS FYOS



PROJECT TITLE: Repairables

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the replacement of repairable parts for rail cars, facilities, systemsequipment, bus parts and major components which are beyond economic repair andincreases in repairable parts inventories when required to support system expansion,increased mileage of the fleets, and effective scheduling of the bus overhaul program.Fiscal 2001 funds the continued support of repairable parts inventories.

JUSTIFICATION:

This project funds the procurement of repairable parts which are vital components ofWMATA's bus and rail system. Adequate quantities of parts are required to performcorrective and preventative maintenance, and overhauls. The funding is provided by 100%local jurisdiction contributions.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $30,000

$ In Thousands

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYO& FY08


INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWALPROGRAMFY 2001 • 2006

PROJECT TITLE: Bus/Rail Support Equipment

DESCRIPTION:


• non-revenue vehicles,• miscellaneous support equipment-other offices,• misc. bus support equipment,• misc. rail support equipment,• bus lifts/bus work equipment,• bus washer rehabilitation,• rail car washer rehabilitation.

Types of equipment to be rehabilitated or replaced include non-revenue vehicles, shopequipment, test equipment, work equipment, major components for buses, overheadcranes, compressors, lifts, jacks, drills, brake testers, brake lathes, chasis washers anddynamometers, and car washing enhancements at all five rail car wash locations. Fiscal2001 funds the replacement of bus lift systems and the continued support of repairableparts inventories, the procurement of non-revenue vehicles and various testing and shopequipment.

JUSTIFICATION:

The replacement of support equipment is critical to the day-to-day operating andadministrative functions of Metrobus and Metrorail operations. Bus work equipment andbus lift enhancements are needed to maintain the reliability of Metrobus service andprovide for an effective maintenance program.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

$ In Thousands

Total: $61,146

FV01 FV02 FVD3 FY04 FY05 FY08



PROJECT TITLE: Southeast Bus Garage

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the rehabilitation of the existing, out-dated Southeastern MetrobusGarage which is necessary to provide a bus maintenance, operation and storage facility.The rehabilitation will be completed within site constraints and environmentalconsiderations. A more modern facility will ensure reliable and efficient bus service to theSoutheast area of the District of Columbia and Southern Prince George's County. Fiscal2001 work includes the award of a contract to rehabilitate the building.

JUSTIFICATION:

The existing facility is more than 60 years old and is in poor condition. It has a capacityfor 100 buses, although it currently houses 129. Southeastern division is one of the betterlocated garages in relation to the service area and scheduling efficiency. However, thephysical condition ofthe building has deteriorated to a point where it is impacting employeemorale and compromising the reliability of service operated from this garage.Rehabilitation will be less costly than replacement.

BUDGET SCHEDULE


FY01

247

FY02

247

FY03

247

FY04

oFYO&

oFY08



PROJECT TITLE: Pennsy Drive Facility

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the lease/purchase ofa training and maintenance facility, known as thePennsy Drive Facility. Fiscal 2001 funds lease/purchase costs, including renovation.

JUSTIFICATION:

Over the years the training and maintenance facilities required to keep pace with theexpansion of bus and rail service has not been adequate. An opportunity exists tolease/purchase a facility to house major functions of the Authority.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $36,000

FY01o

FY02o

FY03o

FY04o

FY05o

FY08



PROJECT TITLE: Rail Work Equipment/Locomotives

DESCRIPTION:


• rail work equipment rehabilitation,• locomotives and prime movers.

These projects fund the design and rehabilitation of all major shop equipment located inthe rail car maintenance shops including overhead cranes, rail train lifts and hoists,industrial shop air compressors, equipment service elevators and hoisting mechanisms,as well as self-propelled rail work equipment and rehabilitation and replacement oflocomotives, deicer cars, flat cars and specialty cars. Fiscal 2001 funds the replacementof cranes and overhaul/repair of lifts and the replacement of 2 prime movers.

JUSTIFICATION:

The replacement of shop equipment and the replacement of heavy work equipment isnecessary to maintain rail car service reliability.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

$ In ThousandsTotal: $23,342

FY01 FY02 FY03 FYD4 FY05 FY06



PROJECT TITLE: Comprehensive Radio System

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the 1) Infrastructure backbone for a new integrated communicationssystem that will serve the needs of all WMATA users, and 2) Integration of new TransitPolice and bus radio systems into the infrastructure. An unfunded contract option wouldallow the addition of rail and maintenance radio systems, if exercised. Fiscal 2001 funds thecontinuation of project management to support the installation of the radio system.

JUSTIFICATION:

The existing TPAS and BUSV radio systems are outdated and outmoded. The reliability ofthe systems, especially at the fringes of the WMATA service area, is unacceptable.Communication is essential to the safety and performance of personnel.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total:$3,124

$ In Thousands

o o o oFY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FYOS



PROJECT TITLE: ATC and Power Systems Rehabilitation

DESCRIPTION:


• train communications upgrade,• public address systems replacement,• rehabilitation of ATC equipment,• rehabilitation of Ale, TPSS and TPS equipment,• traction power switchgear rehabilitation,• Ale power control system,• DC power redundancy.

These projects include design, procurement and installation of all communicationsequipment with the systems including stations, yards and shops, and the rehabilitation andreplacement of electrical systems, AC and DC circuit breakers, switchgear, and waysideautomatic train control equipment. These projects address the need to maintain theinfrastructure and replace worn out, obsolete systems with new components utiliZing newtechnology and achieving energy savings. Fiscal 2001 funds the installation of generators,voltage regulators, motor control centers, track feeder breakers, traction power rectifiers,switchgear, and the mUlti-year train to wayside rehabilitation.

JUSTIFICATION:

Communications systems and right-of-way systems have been in place for up to 24 yearsand have been impacted by the elements which include station dust, water, high humidityand corrosion. Equipment must be rehabilitated/replaced to ensure system reliability andintegrity.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

• In Thouaands Total: $62,474 I

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYO& FYD8



PROJECT TITLE: UPS/Electrical Systems Rehabilitation

DESCRIPTION:


• UPS system replacement,• electrical systems rehabilitation.

These projects fund the replacement of UPS systems and battery banks and therehabilitation, replacement and upgrading of electrical systems including lighting, powercables, power distribution feeds and panels, power transfer switches, motor control centers,voltage regulators, generators and ancillary connected devices. Fiscal 2001 activitiesinclude the replacement ofUPS/batteries at 7 stations, and installation ofgenerators, voltageregulators and motor control centers.

JUSTIFICATION:

It is vital to replace and rehabilitate tunnel and passenger station lighting due to the harshunderground environment and to to procure battery banks to provide emergency power atstations to ensure that passengers are transported in safe and comfortable conditions.

BUDGET SCHDULE


FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYOS FY08



PROJECT TITLE: Bus Fare Collection System Replacement

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the replacement of the existing bus fare collection system which hasexceeded its useful life, with a modern system that will enhance revenue collection byensuring accurate determination and reporting of fares. Approximately 1,400 buses will beequipped with the new system. The new system will have the capability for integration withother on-board bus systems and with Metrorail and parking lot fare collection equipment.Fiscal 2001 funds the contract award for the procurement and installation of the fareboxes.

JUSTIFICATION:

It is believed that WMATA is losing considerable revenue because of the poor reliability ofthe existing system, the requirement for the operator to monitor and enforce various fares,and the fact that the system cannot recognize flash passes and does not automaticallydeduct fares. The existing equipment has exceeded its useful life and must be replaced.

BUDGET SCHEDULE


21,902

FY01

893

FY02o

FY03o

FY04o

FY06o

FYOS



PROJECT TITLE: ROW Track and Structures Rehabilitation

DESCRIPTION:


• ROW structural rehabilitation,• ROW floating slab,• ROW track rehabilitation.

These projects include the design, construction and rehabilitation of aerial structures andtunnels, the retrofit of floating slabs to maintain proper rail elevations, and the replacementof running rail, rail fasteners, rail switch points, stock rail frogs, restraining rail, cross ties andfences and gates. Fiscal 2001 funds the installation of running rail and fasteners along theYellow Line, the steel tunnel liner rehabilitation on the Orange and Yellow Lines and retrofitof floating slabs.

JUSTIFICATION:

These projects are required to control corrosion and deterioration due to weather, thermaleffects, cracks or breaks. Failure to replace these items will effect service reliability andcause system degradation.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $57,958 ISin Thouaands

FY01 . FY02 FYD3 FY04 FYOS FYOS



PROJECT TITLE: Station Tunnel Leak Mitigation

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the design and implementation of a program to correct water leaks instations and tunnels to ensure the structural integrity of the tunnel liners and to preventcorrosion of wayside systems and equipment. Ground water intrusion into stations andtunnels is occurring at numerous stations within Metrorail at cracks and expansion joints.Fiscal 2001 funds the repair of critical leaks along the Blue and Red Lines.

JUSTIFICATION:

Groundwater intrusion has caused extensive corrosion to wayside tunnel systems includingautomatic train control, communications, traction power equipment and cabling. A programis necessary to address this problem.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $10,970

$ In Thousands

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY08

Infrastructure Renewal Program --- Project DescriptionsPage 134


PROJECT TITLE: Information Technology

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds a comprehensive program of replacement of technology systemssupporting the Rail Operations Control Center (ROCS), the mainframe computer, and themajor financial systems and databases. Fiscal 2001 funds the continuation of the ROCSreplacement, as well as database, mainframe and scheduling systems replacement.

JUSTIFICATION:

A long term focused approach is needed to address the technological needs of the Authorityand to insure a systematic replacement of systems is achieved so that the gathering,processing and storing of data is secure.

BUDGET SCHEDULE


FY01 FY02 FY03

2279

FY04 FYO& FY08



PROJECT TITLE: Program Management and Support

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds General and Program Administration costs, including outside engineeringand consultant costs.

JUSTIFICATION:

These costs are necessary to support the management and administration of the IRP and tocontract for the expertise necessary to design specific IRP projects.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total:$61,400

$ In Thousands

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYOS FYOS



PROJECT TITLE: Preventive Maintenance

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds a portion of the bus/rail vehicle overhaul/maintenance program which isincluded in the IRP. Fiscal 2001 funds the continuation of the comprehensive bus/railoverhaul/maintenance program.

JUSTIFICATION:

Capitalizing a portion of the bus/rail overhaul/maintenance costs will ensure high quality busand rail vehicles. This program will also help to extend bus life to 15 years and will reducebus replacement costs and relieve the IRP of some financial burden.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

ITotal: $124,615 I$ In Thousands

21.116

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY08


This Page Not Used

Infrastructure Renewal Program' -'- Project DescriptionsPage 138

RAIL CONSTRUCTIONPROGRAM

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Rail Construction ProgramPage 139

Rail Construction ProgramPage 140

This Page Not Used

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 RAIL CAPITAL BUDGET

103·MILE SYSTEM COMPLETION

REAUTHORIZATION

In November, 1990, President Bush signed Reauthorization Legislation, Public Law101-551, which provides$1.3 billion* in Federal funding to virtually complete the remaining13.5 miles of the 103-mile Adopted Regional System. Local matching funds will total$775.9 million*, resulting in $2,069.1 million* for rail construction after a $6.5 milliondeduction for project management oversight from the Federal share. Local governmentsand utilities have provided $10.3 million for additional scope work, $104 million wastransferred from the 89.5 mile budget, and $36.4 million was transferred from theinsurance buy-out for rail cars and the Branch Avenue Yard, bringing the total programfunds to $2,219.8 million.

*The originallCCA-5 program total was $2,069.6M, however, after the FY1999 appropriation, $O.3M federal remainsin the authorization that is not likely to be appropriated. The federal funds combined with the local match of $O.2Mresults in a revised total of $2,069.1M. .

THE FAST TRACK

The Fast Track Program, whichtheWMATABoard adopted December 19, 1991, includesconstruction of the last 13.5 miles of the Adopted Regional System for $2.1 billionby 2001. This accelerated program creates the annual obligation level which in turnbecomes the annual budget, and is premised on concurrent construction on all lines withstrategies designed to compress schedules and reduce costs. There are four segmentsin the Fast Track Program:

• Blue Line from Van Dorn Street to Franconia-Springfield;• Red Line from Wheaton to Glenmont;• Green Line from U Street-Cardozo to Fort Totten; and• Green Line from Anacostia to Branch Avenue

The Blue Line extension to Franconia-Springfield opened for revenue service on June 29,1997, which completed the 103-mile system in Virginia. The segment consists of onestation and 3.30 miles of surface and aerial line in Fairfax County, Virginia. It is a vital linkin Northern Virginia's network oftransportation enhancements that include a transportationcenter in Franconia adjacent to the station and commuter rail service betweenFredericksburg and Union Station on the Virginia Railway Express (VRE). The VREpassengers will use the Metrorail parking facilities, busbays and pedestrian bridge toaccess the VRE facilities which opened in July 1996. Metrorail construction began in late

Rail Construction Program -- Financial SummaryPage 141

1992 and was completed within budget and on schedule.

The Red Line extension to Glenmont opened for revenue service on JUly 25, 1998. Theextension consists of one station, one rail car yard and 1.35 miles of subway line. TheRed Line extension to Glenmont completes the system in Montgomery County.Construction began in mid-1993 and was completed within budget and on schedule.

Two segments of the Green Line, the Mid-City Route extension between U Street andCardozo and Fort Totten, and the Branch Avenue extension between Anacostia andBranch Avenue, are also included in this program. Completion of the full Green Line,which begins in northern and ends in southern Prince George's County and travelsthrough the center of the District of Columbia, will mean increased economic vitality fortransit dependent communities to get to and from jobs, schools, recreation centers, storesand other attractions.

The Mid-City Route opened for revenue service September 18, 1999. The extensionincludes two stations and 2.9 miles of underground line tunnel construction in the Districtof Columbia. Construction began in early 1994 and was complete within budget aheadof schedule. This segment completes the Green Line from Greenbelt to Anacostia.

The Branch Avenue extension includes five stations and 6.42 miles of underground,surface and aerial lines in the District ofColumbia and Prince George's County, Maryland.Groundbreaking was held in September 1995. Construction and installation of follow-onsystemwide components is well underway. The segment excluding the Branch AvenueYard is approximately 900k complete, is on schedule and within budgetfor revenue serviceto commence in early 2001. The Branch Avenue Yard is approximately 25% complete,is on schedule and within budget. The Yard is scheduled to be available for service mid2002.

Overall, more than $1.9 billion of the $2.1 billion Fast Track bUdget is under contract andmore than $1.6 billion has been expended. All four segments are on schedule and areon or below budget. More than $260 million in assured savings has been reserved forconstruction of the Branch Avenue Yard and procurement of rail cars.

FUNDING FAST TRACK

The Fast Track Program requires three funding components to maintain the schedule.These are, (1) stable Federal Appropriations beginning in Federal Fiscal 1992 andcontinuing through 1999, (2) local matching contributions from local jurisdictions to securethe Federal Appropriation, and (3) a Credit Facility or Line of Credit from major lendinginstitutions.

During the past year, the cumulative grant funds approved by the Federal TransitAdministration reached the level that permitted cancellation of the Line of Credit that wascritical to commencing the Fast Track Program. The Credit Facility was needed, sinceunder WMATA's Compact, it must have a funding source in place at the time it contracts


with a third party for construction, material or services. Further, in order to sustain theschedule, WMATA must contract with third parties at an aggregate value in excess of thecombined Federal Appropriations and local jurisdictional match. Thus, by incorporatingprivate sector financing into the base, the construction schedule was achieved. The CreditFacility was maintained with the Union Bank of Switzerland and Morgan Guaranty TrustCompany.

Each of the local jurisdictions has endorsed the program and signed the Fifth InterimCapital Contributions Agreement (ICCA-V) which lays out the schedule and associatedcosts for both the federal and local share of construction.

ADMINISTRATION

The Fast Track Construction Program relies on a project management organization atWMATA wherein each segment is under the responsibility of a project manager,supported by a team of architects and engineers from start to finish. The project managerhas ultimate responsibility for maintaining the budget and schedule for his or her discreteportion of Fast Track.


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFINANCING SOURCES FOR METRORAIL CONSTRUCTION

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

INVESTMENTSITOTAL FEDERAL LOCAL BONDS

Funds Authorized Prior toStark-Harris Appropriations

Direct Appropriation #1 $1,721 $1,147 $474 $100Handicapped Facilities 65 52 13 0Add-On Projects 23 7 16 0Highway Transfers 2,610 2,156 258 196Bond Sales 813 0 49 764

Subtotal $5,232 $3,362 $810 $1,060

Stark-Harris Appropriations

1983 $300 $240 $38 $221984 312 250 37 251985 312 250 47 151986 270 216 36 181987 250 200 31 191988 224 179 25 201989 209 167 22 201990 106 85 6 151991 80 64 9 71992 35 28 0 71993 20 16 0 4

Subtotal $2,118 $1,695 $251 $172Project Management Oversight (1 ) 5 5 0 0

Stark-Harris Total $2,123 $1,700 $251 $172

Reauthorizations Appropriations

1992 $154 $96 $58 $01993 245 153 92 01994 318 199 119 01995 318 199 119 01996 318 199 119 01997 318 199 119 01998 319 199 120 01999 80 50 30 0

Subtotal thru FY 1999 $2,070 $1,294 $776 $0Project Management Oversight (1) 6 6 0 0

Reauthorization Total $2,076 $1,300 $776 $0

Total Authorized $9,431 $6,362 $1,837 $1,232

(1) NOTE: Funds retained by the Federal Government to fund FTA oversight of the WMATAConstruction Program.

Rail Construction Program -- Funding SourcesPage 144

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYMETRORAIL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

103 Mile System Completion

Projected Obligation Schedule(Dollars in Millions)

Mid-City OuterFiscal Year Rail Cars OCC Blue Line Red Line Green Line Green Line Total

Prior $8.5 $5.6 $16.5 $2.8 $33.41993 4.0 38.0 9.2 8.6 2.8 62.61994 2.4 38.2 126.5 261.3 30.3 458.71995 47.6 27.6 100.4 66.8 242.41996 11.4 34.4 60.2 310.1 416.11997 1.0 0.7 8.5 14.7 61.1 109.3 195.31998 198.6 5.7 11.4 35.0 103.4 354.11999 20.7 0.4 7.7 34.7 39.2 102.72000 51.6 7.1 14.1 22.4 110.5 205.72001 6.9 0.3 5.1 67.7 80.02002 38.3 24.6 62.92003 6.0 6.0

TOTAL PROGRAM $278.8 $7.1 $165.4 $251.5 $643.6 $873.5 $2,219.9

Project Cost Summary(Dollars in Millions)

Mid-City OuterDescription Blue Line Red Line Green Line Green Line Total

Management and Consultants $29.5 $41.8 $88.8 $115.9 $276.0Startup and Force Account 1.4 3.4 2.0 2.5 9.3Work Equipment 3.1 2.7 1.1 8.8 15.7Preliminary Engineering 0.2 0.5 1.3 2.8 4.8Design 8.1 9.4 20.0 32.2 69.7Real Estate 5.2 1.6 19.5 30.0 56.3Station, Line and Yard 80.5 123.6 386.4 392.2 982.7Systemwide 27.3 44.6 47.8 103.5 223.2Other Construction 0.0 1.4 3.0 5.4 9.8Contingency 0.0 5.0 35.0 12.0 52.0Insurance 7.7 14.3 33.4 46.2 101.6Fare Collection 1.4 1.9 2.5 6.0 11.8Cost of Credit Facility 1.0 1.3 2.8 4.0 9.1

Subtotal 103-Mile System 165.4 251.5 643.6 761.4 1,821.9

Operations Control Center 7.1Rail Cars 69.1 42.4 0.0 167.3 278.8Branch Avenue Yard 112.0 112.0

TOTAL PROGRAM $234.5 $293.9 $643.6 $1,040.7 $2,219.8


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFY 2001 Obligations


Management and Consultants $0.3 $5.0 $13.8 $19.1Startup and Force Account 2.0 2.0Work Equipment 4.6 4.6Preliminary EngineeringDesign 0.1 0.4 0.5Real Estate 1.5 1.5Station, Line and Yard 10.8 10.8Systemwide 11.5 11.5Other Construction 2.0 2.0Contingency 8.5 8.5InsuranceFare CollectionCost of Credit FacilityYard 12.6 12.6Rail Cars 6.9 6.9

Subtotal 103 Mile Program 0.0 0.3 5.1 74.6 80.0

89 Mile Program 2.0

TOTAL OBLIGATIONS 0.0 0.3 5.1 74.6 $82.0

FY 2001 Expenditures


Management and Consultants $0.3 $7.3 $13.2 $20.8Startup and Force Account 1.7 1.7Work Equipment 0.2 4.8 5.0Preliminary EngineeringDesign 0.5 1.1 1.6Real Estate 0.3 3.0 3.3Station, Line and Yard 4.8 17.4 22.2Systemwide 0.9 25.8 26.7Other Construction 0.4 2.7 3.1Contingency 1.5 1.5InsuranceFare Collection 0.3 0.3Cost of Credit FacilityYard 44.3 44.3Rail Cars 96.6

TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0.0 $0.3 $14.4 $115.8 $227.1


BLUE LINE: VAN DORN TO FRANCONIA-SPRINGFIELD (J/H ROUTE)

Status Entering WMATA Fiscal 2001

• METRORAIL Station Complete and in Revenue Service

Major Activities During WMATA Fiscal 2001

• Contract Close-out

Revenue Operations Date

• June 1997 - Completed on Schedule

Rail Construction Program -- Franconia/Springfield LinePage 147

Q)c::.J"0Q)

~ClC...Cen

""'-.~Co".Station ~~

Locatlona u.RouteMil••

-~..•.- E

ISurface

ro3.28 1

...CD

Aerial0

0.02L.

0 0..

~C

--=...811 ........ 0.~

Totals()

3.30 1 ~~.....,0COc~o~

Fairfax Co•• VA 3.30 1u m== CJ)(0 roa: a...

RED LINE: WHEATON TO GLENMONT (OUTER B ROUTE)


• Glenmont Station complete and in Revenue Service


• Contract Close-out


• July 25, 1998 - Completed on Schedule

Rail Construction Program -- Glenmont LinePage 149

":IJQ) Q)

cc==CD n~o

O1::Joen.-+..,Co.....o·::J

-U..,o(Q..,Q)

3

RouteMil_

StationLocations

Underground(Montgomery Co., MD)

........~1.35 1

GREEN LINE: U STREET TO FORT TOTTEN (E ROUTE)


• . Mid-City Route complete and in revenue service

• Complete landscaping


• Contract close-out


• September 18,1999 - Completed 3 months ahead of schedule

Rail Construction Program -- Mid-City Green LinePage 151

~c:

I

o;:;"-<G>...,CDCD::J

c:::JCD

--...

Underground(Dlsbie!of Columbl.t

RauteMil••

2.10

BillionLocatlona

• J

2

GREEN LINE: ANACOSTIA TO BRANCH AVENUE (F ROUTE)


• All major structural contracts completed.

• All reforestation and station landscaping contracts awardedand underway.

• Track and special trackwork installation completed and contact railenergized for the entire route.

• Dynamic testing of automatic train control underway

• Yard construction underway. All underground utilities and siteworkcompleted.


• Complete systemwide contracts (traction power, automatic traincontrol, station furniture, communications and kiosks, elevators andescalators, graphics)

• Complete reforestation, landscaping and wetland mitigationcontracts.

• Install fare collection equipment.

• Complete pre-revenue operations and testing.

• Complete 500/0 of O&M Building, car wash and car maintenancebuildings of the yard; all systems work underway.


• Early 2001 - on schedule

• Branch Avenue Yard schedule completion - mid 2002

Rail Construction Program -- Branch Avenue LinePage 153

"'U:IJOJ Q)co =:ron~o

O1::J~cn

.-+..,C(')

d.o:::J

"..,oco..,Q)

3

OJ..,Q)

:J()::r»<ro::JcCD

c:~CD

Route StationMII.s Locations

-----..._--- ...._...- ..V.d Underground 1.27 1

Surf.c. 3.82 3

Aerial 1.&3 1

• .aa..c:a ••c ••==-_Total. 8.42 &

I i

t • "Dlatrlct of Columbia 1.88 1

Prince Oeorg8'. 4.73 4County, MD

Reimbursable Projects

REIMBURSABLEPROJECTS

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Page 155

Reimbu rsable ProjectsPage 156

This Page Not Used

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 BUDGET

REIMBURSABLE OPERATING PROJECTS

The projects budgeted here are for new services or for items that incur operatingexpenses for which there is a specific funding source other than local operatingsubsidy. The concept of "New Service" was a direct offshoot of the Regional MobilityPanel's recommendations to stabilize and strengthen Metrobus through a series ofinitiatives. Through the Panel's efforts, a new spirit reinvigorated Metrobus andprovided a nationally recognized system a means to compete in terms of costeffectiveness and efficiency with private carriers. A part of this competitiveness wasthe acceptance of a New Service Agreement by Local 689 of the Amalgamated TransitUnion, which established new wages and benefits for bus operators operating newservice routes.

In fiscal 1999, the Authority established a new budget category to account for NewService being operated by Metrobus. New Service is bus service not previouslyperformed by either the Authority or directly by a Compact Jurisdiction, and for whicha separate subsidy payment is made. Thus, these costs and revenues are not includedin either the regional or non-regional bus budgets. Examples of new service include thePrince William County Service, 1-270 Shuttle, and the Greenbelt Shuttle.

POTOMAC & RAPPAHANNOCK TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PRTC). WMATAwas awarded a multi-year contract (three year base, with two one-year options) tooperate local and express bus service in Prince William County beginning on July 6,1998. The multi-million dollar annual contract marks the first time that the Authorityhas competed successfully with private carriers to provide bus service. A staff of 95Metrobus employees will operate and maintain 75 buses owned by Prince WilliamCounty, which are located in the County's transportation facility in Dale City, Virginia.The service operates in Woodbridge, Dale City, Manassas and Manassas Park andprovides bus service to downtown Washington, and to the Pentagon, Crystal City,Franconia-Springfield and West Falls Church Metro stations, in addition to local routesin Prince William County. The fiscal year 2001 is the last year of the three year basecontract with an estimated amount of $4.8 million dollars.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA'S DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (DC DPW). OnNovember 10, 1999, a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the District ofColumbia and the Authority was entered into for the duration of one year. WMATA willprovide technical staff and resources to assist the District's Department of PublicWorks (DC-DPW) in administering their street, highway, and bridge construction andrehabilitation programs. A staff of 35 limited-duration WMATA employees will be hiredfor the duration of this MOA. All work associated with the MOA will be reimbursed bythe DC-DPW.

Reimbursable ProjectsPage 157

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RIDE-ON. WMATA was awarded a one year contract tooperate bus service beginning September 7, 1999. The Authority is providing busservice formerly operated by Montgomery County's Ride-On Service from theGermantown / Gaithersburg / Poolesville area to/from Shady Grove Station and localshuttle service around Silver Spring and Bethesda area. A staff of 22 Metrobusemployees will operate and maintain the service utilizing 12 specially paintedMetrobuses. The contract amount is $1.2 million.

GREENBELT SHUTTLE. The Greenbelt parking lot is larger than all other parking lotsin the Metro system, with 3,364 parking spaces. Estimated walking time from thestation to outlying areas of the parking lot is seven minutes. A shuttle operatesthroughout the parking lot to transport patrons between five shelters and the station.There is no fee for this shuttle. This demonstration project, which began in January,1997, is paid for by the State of Maryland. Two additional part-time operators arerequired to operate this service. Operating expenses are budgeted at $56,400. Theshuttle service will operate as long as funding is available and there is a sufficientdemand to justify continuation of the service.

SPRINGFIELD CIRCULATOR SERVICE. Fairfax County, in conjunction with theTransportation Association of Greater Springfield (TAGS), has requested this servicebe operated to enhance public transportation and decrease traffic congestion. TheAuthority will purchase and operate 20-passenger buses on weekdays and service fivestops, including Franconia-Springfield Metro Station. The Authority will be reimbursedfor all operating and capital costs through funding provided by Virginia's CMAQ funds($650,000) and matching funds from Fairfax County and TAGS ($180,000). Thisservice has added an additional 6 operators and 1 mechanic to approved staffing levels.

SPRINGFIELD SHUTTLE. As part of the 1-95 11-395 / 1-495 Interchange ReconstructionCongestion Mitigation Program, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) andthe Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (VDRPT) has approvedfunding for the Authority to purchase and operate a 20-passenger bus. This service willprovide shuttle service to and from the parking structure at the Franconia-SpringfieldMetro Station (when garage capacity meets 90%) to a remote lot at Springfield Mall.The service will operate during peak and limited mid-day hours, Monday through Friday.This service has additional one bus operator to approved staffing levels.

CROFTON - NEW CARROLLTON SERVICE. The Washington Suburban TransitCommission has requested and the Board of Directors approved expanding the TransitZone to designated areas within Anne Arundel County, in and around Crofton,Maryland. At the request of the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA), the Authoritywill operate service for residents of the Crofton area to the New Carrollton MetroStation; provide new service to growing but unserved areas of Bowie, Maryland; and


add service to the Bowie Park & Ride lot to alleviate overcrowding. The cost of theservice will be reimbursed 100°;& by Maryland. This service has added an additional 2operators and 1 mechanic to approved staffing levels. The operating expenses arebudgeted at $138,000 offset by an estimated $31,000 in revenues.

VAN POOLS. This program is to assist Northern Virginia and the region in meeting airquality conformity through emission reductions by increasing the utilization of van poolsand the amount of federal formula funds (Section 5307) allocated to the region and theAuthority. The van pool incentive program is the only emissions reduction program thatwill be financially self-sustaining. The Authority has been asked to coordinate andmanage the program because it is the only regional agency that can accept anddisburse these federal funds. A portion of the funds received will be used to pay theadministrative costs of the Authority. The budget for fiscal 2001 is $150,500,including two additional positions.

ACCESS-TO-JOBS. This program has five grant elements and when complete willprovide a "One Stop" employment trip information, referral and dispatching centerwithin the Authority, as well as provide trip brokerage services, outreach and reversecommute to the suburban job market. The program will require three reimbursabletemporary positions which will remain for the duration of the grant. In Fiscal 2001,WMATA will receive $344, 000 for direct expenses.

HYBRID-ELECTRIC BUS SERVICE. This is a new experimental service using hybridelectric buses in the City of Falls Church. The agreement is between the NorthernVirginia Transportation Commission (NVTC), the City of Falls Church and WMATA. TheAuthority will operate and maintain the buses by providing one additional mechanic andfour operators. The Fiscal 2001 budget is estimated at $512,000 and will be fullyreimbursed by NVTC.


SUMMARYREIMBURSABLE OPERATING PROJECTS

FISCAL 2001(in millions of dollars)

Service Expense Revenue Positions

PRTe $4.80 $4.80 95

DCDPW $3.70 $3.70 35

Ride-On $1.20 $1.20 22

Greenbelt Shuttle $0.06 $0.06 2

Springfield Circulator $0.66 $0.66 8

Springfield Shuttle $0.15 $0.15 1

Crofton - New Carrollton $0.14 $0.14 3

Van Pools $0.15 $0.15 2

Access-to-Jobs $0.34 $0.34 3

Hybrid-Electric Bus Service $0.51 $0.51 8

Total $11.71 $11.71 179


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 BUDGET

SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT AND EXPANSION

A separate budget category, reimbursable capital projects, was established during fiscal 1996to fund projects that are fully reimbursed for all costs by state or local governments or privateentities. As a general rule, the reimbursable capital projects budget includes those projectsthat are beyond the Authority's operating, capital improvement program or rail constructionprogram budgets.

The following list summarizes the currently approved projects and funding sources forWMATA staff support and associated expenses. Each of the projects contains severalincrements and specific activities, all of which will be performed on a reimbursable basis. Infiscal 2001, an estimated 43 staff years and associated costs will be required to supportprojects valued at approximately $74.6 million. The list also includes several large projectsfor which some funds have been received by WMATA but are still in negotiation. It isanticipated that there will be changes to the project budgets and staffing that will requirebudget adjustments during the fiscal year.

BLUE LINE EXTENSION TO LARGO. On July 7,2000, the FTA granted approval forWMATAto begin final design on the 3.1 mile Extension to Largo Town Center. Also, FTA issued preaward spending authority for the Extension in the amount of $33.0 million, exclusive of finaldesign cost. An agreement between WMATA and the Maryland Department ofTransportation has been executed providing financial commitment for the State share of the$434 million project budget. An application for Full Funding Grant Agreement (FFGA) wassubmitted in May, 2000 and is under review by the FTA. Execution of the FFGA andgroundbreaking is anticipated for the Fall 2000. In May 2000, the WMATA Board approvedthe Extension into the Adopted Region System (ARS) subject to Congressional approval ofthe FFGA.

ROSSLYN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES. This project is comprised of modifications to the RosslynStation entrance and mezzanine to provide passenger-oriented amenities and accommodationsby widening sidewalks, enhancing bus shelters, and improving external and internal signage,lighting, entrances, and other elements of the station. WMATA will design and construct thejointly agreed upon improvements for Arlington County. Construction contract was awardedand Notice to Proceed issued October 18, 1999. Contract completion scheduled for May2000. Total project budget is $2,125,000.

NEW DC CONVENTION CENTER. A new DC Convention Center has been approved for theMt. Vernon Square area which will require major modifications to the Mt. Vernon Square/UDCMetrorail station. The Washington Convention Center Authority and WMATA have executedOperating and Construction Agreements for the $25' million budgeted for stationimprovements. The Mezzanine Contract was awarded in April, 1999 and substantialcompletion occurred in February, 2000. The Entrance Expansion contract is scheduled to beawarded in the Fall, 2000. In fiscal 2000 approximately $3.2 million will be allocated to thisproject.

KING STREET STATION ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS. The City of Alexandria accepted the King


portions of the Study. On December 9, 1999, the Board approved the King Street StationProject as a Reimbursable Project. An Agreement is scheduled for execution by July, 2000.WMATA Staff will proceed with the installation of new fare gates and fare vendors, andstation modifications; thereby providing a new entrance to the existing mezzanine and a newmezzanine with escalators, elevators, gates and vendors on the north side of CommonwealthAvenue. The FY2001 budget for this project is $1.2 million.

DULLES AIRPORT CORRIDOR. Current proposals for the provision of improved public transitservices in the Tysons Corner to Dulles Airport corridor involve the creation of a bus rapidtransit service, followed by the construction of a rail line from West Falls Church to DullesAirport and beyond. A total of $1.5 million has been obligated to date for consultant servicesand staff to study transit alternatives. A grant application for $40 million was submitted inJanuary 2000. Work will commence when funding becomes available.

VIENNA PARKING GARAGE. Fairfax County requested WMATA to conduct a feasibility studyfor an additional parking structure at the Vienna station. Project agreements with FairfaxCounty for the feasibility study, planning and design were approved in fiscal 1999, withfunding from the County's parking surcharge account. Public hearings were held and a designbuild contract was awarded in May 1999 and is scheduled for completion by February 2001.

SILVER SPRING TRANSPORTATION CENTER (SSTC) PHASES I & II: MTA is relocating itsMARC Silver Spring Commuter Railroad Station from its current location at the intersectionof Georgia Avenue to the immediate vicinity of the existing Silver Spring Metrorail station.This relocation (SSTC Phase I Project) will require the construction of two (2) platformsincluding associated pedestrian access facilities, a pedestrian bridge with stair towers andelevators. As of December 1999 MTA has funded $216,863 for WMATA 's effort on thisproject. The new intermodal transportation center (SSTC Phase II Project by MontgomeryCounty) will be a multilevel facility that will include improved bus bays, kiss & ride and taxispaces, intercity bus terminal, regional bicycle trails, future light rail and commuter orientedretail/service spaces. The general plans were completed in December, 1999 and the WMATApublic hearing was held on January 18, 2000. The amount of funding and scope of supportfor this project are still under negotiation between WMATA and Montgomery County.WMATA temporarily funded their effort in SSTC Phase II using MTA's SSTC Phase I funds.

NEW PROJECT PLANNING. In fiscal 2001, $2.3 million is budgeted for advancing selectedprojects through Engineering Development. This effort provides sketch engineering conceptsfor new extension or capacity enhancement projects in the District, Maryland and Virginia.Current focus is on the following projects:

Route 1 Pentagon to Braddock Road LRTMaryland Beltway New Carrollton to Montgomery Mall MetrorailMaryland Beltway Branch Avenue to Wilson Bridge MetrorailVirginia Belt.way Wilson Bridge to AlexandriaRosslyn Station Second Entrance

Projects within the district remain on hold pending confirmation from the Director ofPublic Works.


NEW YORK AVENUE STATION. This project involves the environmental planning, preliminaryengineering, public hearing, design and construction of a new "infill" station on the Red Linebetween Union Station and Rhode Island Station. On July 22, 1999, the Board approved thisproject as a Reimbursable Project. An initial $5,000,000 has been made available for theenvironmental planning, preliminary engineering and public hearing. Funding for the totalproject budget of approximately $84,000,000 is being coordinated with the District ofColumbia and the Federal Government. Obligations for FY2001 are projected at approximately$2.9 million with obligations for FY2002 and beyond subject to approval of the project in theTIP, WMATA Board approval of the project into the Adopted Regional System (ARS), and theavailability of funds.

BALLSTON STATION IMPROVEMENTS. This work involves planning, design and constructionof a new mezzanine, new entrance(s), and new elevators. On December 9, 1999, the Boardapproved this project as a Reimbursable Project. An agreement is being coordinated withArlington County and is expected to be executed by July 2000. Approximately $8,700,000has been identified by the County for this project with additional funds anticipated to beidentified in the future. Obligations for FY2001 and beyond will be dependent on Task Orderrequests received from Arlington County.

CLARENDON STATION IMPROVEMENTS. This project involves a planning, design andconstruction of an Entrance Canopy and related site improvements. On December 9, 1999,the Board approved this project as a Reimbursable Project. An agreement is being coordinatedwith Arlington County and is expected to be executed by July 2000. Approximately$960,000 has been identified for the project. Obligations for FY2001 and beyond will bedependent on Task Order requests received from Arlington County.

ROSSLYN STATION IMPROVEMENTS. This project involves a planning study effort for a new2nd Entrance into the Station. On December 9, 1999, the Board approved this project as aReimbursable Project. An agreement is being coordinated with Arlington County and isexpected to be executed by July 2000. Approximately $120,000 has been identified for theproject with additional funds to be identified in the future. Obligations for FY2001 and beyondwill be dependent on Task Order requests received from Arlington County.

SHIRLINGTON BUS TERMINAL. This project involves the design and construction of a newoff-street terminal with improved passenger transfer capability and patron amenities. OnDecember 9, 1999, the Board approved this project as a Reimbursable Project. An agreementis being coordinated with Arlington County and is expected to be executed by July 2000.Approximately $1,100,000 has been identified for this project. Obligations for FY2001 andbeyond will be dependent on Task Order requests received from Arlington County.

PENTAGON BUS TERMINAL. This project involves the relocation and reconfiguration of theexisting bus terminal. On December 9, 1999, the Board approved this project as aReimbursable Project. An Agreement is being coordinated with Arlington County and isexpected to be executed by July 2000. Approximately $200,000 has been identified for thisproject. Obligations for FY2001 and beyond will be dependent on Task Order requestsreceived from Arlington County.


WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT·AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 BUDGET

SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT AND EXPANSION

Estimate InMillions

Blue Line Extension to Largo $100.00

Rosslyn Livable Communities $ 0.00

New DC Convention Center $ 3.20

King Street Station Access Improvements $ 1.42

Dulles Airport Corridor $ 40.00*

Vienna Parking Garage $ 0.34

Silver Spring Transportation Center $ 0.00

New Project Planning $ 2.30

New York Avenue Station $ 70.00

Ballston Station Improvements $ 8.70

Clarendon Station Improvements $ 0.96

Rosslyn Station Improvements $ 0.12

Shirlington Bus Terminal $ 1.10

ITS Communication Projects $ 1.56

Pentagon Bus Terminal $ 0.20

Total $229.91

* Fiscal 2001-2002 Budget


ALLOCATION OFSUBSIDY BY

JURISDICTION

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Allocation of Subsidy by JurisdictionPage 165

This Page Not Used

Allocation of Subsidy by JurisdictionPage 166

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 JURISDICTION SUBSIDY REQUIREMENTS

OPERATING BUDGETSUMMARY

The Operating Budget for Fiscal 2001 is supported by $338.8 million of state and local subsidycontributions, excluding debt service costs of $27.5 million. Funding for operations comesfrom many sources, the largest source being passenger and non-passenger revenues generatedfrom operation of the system. Total operating revenues for fiscal 2001 are projected at$389.6 million.

The total operating subsidy plus d~bt service, $366.3 million, will be billed to the District ofColumbia; Montgomery and Prince George's Counties in Maryland; and the Cities ofAlexandria, Fairfax, and Falls Church and the Counties of Arlington and Fairfax in Virginia.Subsidy contributions are billed in accordance with a series of allocation procedures asapproved by the WMATA Board of Directors. The State of Maryland funds all of the operatingassistance, matching funds for rail construction expenditures and funding for the InfrastructureRenewal Program allocated to the two Maryland Counties. The Commonwealth of Virginiaprovides a portion of the operating and capital funds to the Northern Virginia TransportationCommission on behalf of the Northern Virginia jurisdictions.

The allocations presented in this budget are computed based on the fiscal 2001 costs andrevenues by mode as follows:

Approved Budget(In Thousands of Dollars)

Net LocalCost Revenue Subsidy

AuditAdjustment

Bus Operations (incl. Charter)Rail Operations *MetroAccess

TOTAL - OperatingPlus: Debt Service

Net Operating Subsidy

$297,144406,742

24,598

$728,484

$106,742281,551

1,346

$389,639

$190,402125,191

23,252

$338,84527,484

$366,329

($4,978)($17,548)

2,010

($20,516)

* Includes max fare subsidy of $3, 196,700.

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction-- OperatingPage 167

The costs shown above are net of $19.4 million of preventive maintenance expenses that arecapitalized and funded through the Infrastructure Renewal Program (lRP). Beginning in fiscal1998, in lieu of federal operating assistance, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) allowedtransit properties to capitalize a portion, not to exceed 50%, of revenue vehicle maintenanceexpenses. In line with this authority, the operating budget for fiscal 2001 capitalizes $18million of Metrobus revenue vehicle maintenance and overhaul expense and $1.4 million forMetrorail preventive maintenance.

The revenues shown on the previous page incorporate the transfer of $8.7 million of Metrorailpassenger revenues to the Metrobus mode. This was a funding concept initiated with the Fiscal2000 Operating Budget to help fund the Metrobus Fare Simplification program. On February25, 1999, the WMATA Board approved Resolution #99-09, adopting the fare restructuringeffective June 20, 1999. This resolution recognized the General Manager's commitment notto increase Metrobus average fares or subsidies for the same level of service through fiscal2002 and extended this commitment to include Metrorail fares through fiscal 2002. In theFiscal 2000 Budget, $3.8 million of rail revenues were transferred to the Metrobus mode; theFiscal 2001 Budget transfers an additional $4.9 million.

A. METROBUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE FORMULA

In 1997, the WMATA Board of Directors established a Regional Mobility Panel to determinehow to meet current and future bus transportation needs for the region. As part of that effort,the Panel conducted an in-depth study of Metrobus service and how local jurisdictions arecharged for their service. The Panel recommended: (1) criteria to classify Metrobus service asregional and non-regional service; and (2) a new benefit-based subsidy allocation formula forregional service. The Board of Directors approved the regional Metrobus subsidy allocationformula on June 25, 1998 (Resolution #98-27) and the non-regional Metrobus subsidyallocation formula on July 9, 1998 (Resolution #98-32). Each local jurisdiction and theWashington Suburban Transit Commission approved the new regional formula by signing theInterjurisdictional Funding Agreement (IFA) for Bus Service and WMATA Rehabilitation andReplacement Program. The chart at the end of this section, entitled "Fiscal 2001 Summary ofState/Local Operating Requirements," is based on the new for~ulasand transition ceilings foreach jurisdiction to phase in the change from the old to the new formula.

Based on the criteria set out in the IFA, each bus route has been designated either as a routeof regional significance or as a non-regional route. The routes by category have been modifiedfrom the originallFA as changes have been made to the Metrobus service plan. Estimates ofthe annual platform hours for fiscal 2001 for each Metrobus route are presented in theUMetrobus Operations" section of this book.


Regional Metrobus Subsidy Allocation

The regional Metrobus subsidy allocation formula is based on each jurisdiction's share of fourfactors:

~ 25% of subsidy - a weighted average of urbanized area population and populationdensity using 1990 census data and the 1990 census population definition of theurbanized area;

~ 15% of subsidy - weekday ridership on the regional routes by jurisdiction of residence;~ 35% of subsidy - annual revenue miles for the regional routes; and~ 25% of subsidy - annual revenue hours for the regional routes.

However, for fiscal 1999 through 2002, the amounts billed to each jurisdiction for regionalservice are the amounts set out in Resolution #98-27, plus improvements to regional serviceimplemented as part of (1) new rail phase openings or (2) Board approved regional serviceguidelines. Specifically, the changes to the regional base allocation are:

~ service on Route C8 from the Glenmont Station to College Park was expanded to addmid-day weekday and Saturday service (fiscal 1999);

~ a Route F2 loop was added on the Chillum Road line (fiscal 1999);~ regional bus routes serving the neighborhoods around the Columbia Heights and Georgia

Avenue - Petworth Metrorail Stations were restructured to better serve the community(fiscal 2000);the deployment of small buses in the District of Columbia allowed improved structuringof service on Routes 01, D3 from Sibley Hospital to Stadium - Armory, Routes H2, 3,4, the Crosstown Line, and the N2,4,6, the Massachusetts Avenue line (fiscal 2000);

~ service adjustments to relieve overcrowding and improve schedule adherence wereapproved as part of the Fiscal 2000 Operating Budget (fiscal 2000);

~ additional service adjustments to relieve overcrowding and improve schedule adherenceare included in the Proposed Fiscal 2001 Operating Budget;

~ new regional bus service which consists of service from Anacostia to MinnesotaAvenue, from Chevy Chase to Dupont Circle, from Brookland to Potomac Park, fromGreenbelt to Twinbrook (C2/C4), from Greenbelt to Glenmont, and from Alexandria tothe Potomac Yard Circulator (fiscal 2001);

~ Branch Avenue Bus Service Plan for 5.5 months of rail service from the AnacostiaStation to Branch Avenue. This service will commence on January 13, 2001.

~ conversion of the SmartMover bus service from demonstration service to regional busservice. Express bus service from Bethesda to Tyson's Corner, Metrobus Routes 14A,B,M, has been operating as a demonstration service since September 28, 1998. Theapproved budget includes a plan to cut back service to reflect the ridership, therebycreating a cut-back route 14C and 14D from Lake Forest to Rock Springs in MontgomeryCounty. In the allocation formula, ridership, revenue miles, and revenue hours arecharged 50% to Fairfax County and 50% to Montgomery County for all express andshuttle routes except Route 14C and 140 where they are charged to MontgomeryCounty (fiscal 2001);

~ implementation of the Washington Navy-Yard Shuttle, Branch Avenue to King Streetroute (fiscal 2001);

~ additional strategic buses (fiscal 2001);


additional bus service resulting from weekend late closing from midnight to 2:00 a.m.Service from midnight to 1:00 a.m. was implemented in November 1999 asdemonstration service and is now a permanent part of the fiscal 2001 budget. Servicefrom 1:00 - 2:00 a.m. is in the fiscal 2001 budget as demonstration service for a fullyear (fiscal 2001);other revenues and costs related to regional bus service such as new advertisingcontract revenues and worker's compensation savings, and costs for enhancedmarketing, diesel fuel, and employee training and accelerated recruitment (fiscal 2001).

The allocation of the regional Metrobus subsidy for the Fiscal 2001 Operating Budget ispresented on Table 1.

Non-regional Metrobus Subsidy Allocation

In Resolution #98-32, the Board approved a mechanism to allocate among the jurisdictions thecosts and revenues for non-regional Metrobus service. The mechanism essentially distributesthe cost of non-regional service in proportion to the platform hours and the passenger revenuesin accordance with revenue-by-line data from the registering farebox system. The platformhours by line and by jurisdiction are shown in the "Metrobus Operations" section of this book.

The General Manager's commitment to stable Metrobus subsidies from fiscal 1998 throughfiscal 2002 applies to non-regional, as well as to regional, Metrobus service. Thus, the basesubsidy for non-regional remains as established in Resolution #98-32. Metrobus servicechanges to the base are:

.. the Oyster/Lewis school service, L30-34, in the District of Columbia (fiscal 1999);

.. the 1-270 express service, J8, 9, from Montgomery Village to the Bethesda MetroStation (fiscal 1999);

.. restructuring of service in the Kettering area of Prince George's County, routesC22,23,25,26 (fiscal 1999);

.. extension of route 28C to Northern Virginia Community College (fiscal 1S99);

.. restructuring of Glover Park-Trinidad line, the Crosstown lines, the MassachusettsAvenue line, and the Southeast Community Hospital Line with deployment of the newsmall bus fleet in the District of Columbia (fiscal 2000);

.. new routes serving the Columbia Heights, Woodley Park, and Mount Pleasantneighborhoods with the opening of the Inner Green Line; and

.. the extension of routes 3W, 3Z, and 24T in Fairfax County to the new Tyson'sTransportation Center.

.. adjustments in service resulting from implementation of new rail service from Anacostiato Branch Avenue (fiscal 2001)

.. planning activities for bus service from Union Station to the Dulles corridor (fiscal 2001 );other non-regional bus service costs resulting from the weekend late closing, enhancedmarketing, and diesel fuel (fiscal 2001).


The platform hours by jurisdiction are:

TABLE 2

Jurisdiction

District of Columbia

Montgomery County

Prince George's County

Alexandria

Fairfax County

Total

PlatformHours

344,316

106,410

208,034

19,743

106,510

785,013

The subsidies by jurisdiction for non-regional service are shown on Table 3. The base is theservice approved for the Fiscal 1999 Budget. The new service is any service since the Fiscal1999 Budget was approved.


B. METRORAIL OPERATING ASSISTANCE

Metrorail operating assistance is $125.2 million for fiscal 2001. Two allocation formulas areused to determine the subsidy for each jurisdiction: the rail sUbsidy allocation formula has beenused to allocate $122.0 million of subsidy and the max fare subsidy formula has been used toallocate $3.2 million of subsidy.

(1 ) Metrorail Subsidy

The Metrorail subsidy allocated for billing purposes totals $121,994,729. Each jurisdiction'sshare is determined as follows:

~ One-third of the subsidy is distributed on the basis of the relative number of stations inoperation in each jurisdiction. This factor includes all stations in the system with theexception of the Arlington Cemetery Station.

One-third of the subsidy is distributed on the basis of a weighted average of urbanizedarea population and population density using 1990 census data and the 1990 censuspopulation definition of the urbanized area. Fiscal 1994 was the first fiscal year that1990 census data was used.

One-third of the subsidy is distributed on the basis of the weekday Metrorail passengersby jurisdiction of residence. This factor has been computed using data from the Spring1994 Metrorail Passenger Survey.

The percent distribution for fiscal 2001 is shown on the following page. The allocation ofstations and passengers includes the opening of the outer green line stations on January 13,2001.

(2) Max Fare Subsidy

The max fare subsidy is one-half the revenue differential between what riders traveling morethan six composite miles actually pay and what they would have paid without a tapered mileagecharge or a fare cap. The allocation of this subsidy by jurisdiction is determined from theMetrorail passenger survey. The charge to each jurisdiction reflects the residence of the ridersreceiving the benefit of the reduced peak period fares and the value of the benefit received.The estimated amount of max fare subsidy for fiscal 2001 is $3, 196,700. The slight increaseover fiscal 2000 reflects the opening of the outer green line stations on January 13,2001. Theestimated distribution is shown below.


Metrorail Subsidy andMax Fare Subsidy

Estimated Jurisdiction Distributions - Fiscal 2001

Metrorail Max FareJurisdiction Subsidy Subsidy

District of Columbia 36.93% 6.85%

Montgomery County 18.00% 50.30%

Prince George's County 16.29% 15.93%

Alexandria 4.38% 2.08%

Arlington County 9.95% 1.66%

Fairfax City 0.30% 1.06%

Fairfax County 13.87% 21.81 %

Falls Church 0.28% 0.31 °16

Total 100.00% 100.00%


C. METROACCESS OPERATING ASSISTANCE

MetroAccess is the regional paratransit system coordinated by WMATA to provide public transitservices to individuals with disabilities who either reside in or are visiting the WMATA servicearea. The system was established in response to the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990(ADA). The Act requires that complementary paratransit service be provided to persons whoare not able to use the regular transit system. MetroAccess is supported by members of theWMATA compact. The system is operated with core carriers1 complemented by contractservice operators.2 Fiscal 2001 will be the fifth year of the Federal mandate requiring all transitproperties to provide unconstrained levels of paratransit service.

The WMATA Board of Directors approved a new paratransit formula on June 10, 1999, thatmore accurately assigned the costs of the MetroAccess service to the jurisdiction served.Beginning with fiscal 2000 and continuing until changed by the Board of Directors, WMATA'sMetroAccess costs will be allocated among the District of Columbia, Montgomery and PrinceGeorge's Counties in Maryland, and Northern Virginia as an entity, as follows:

• Direct Costs - the contract carriers' actual per trip, reservation, and eligibilitycharges will be allocated directly to jurisdictions; and

• Overhead Costs - all other costs of the paratransit program will be allocated inproportion to the direct costs.

The Northern Virginia jurisdictions of Arlington and Fairfax Counties, and the Cities ofAlexandria, Fairfax, and Falls Church have determined that the following procedure will be usedby WMATA to further allocate costs within Northern Virginia:

• Direct Costs - per trip charges will be adjusted to reflect the average time of tripsprovided for each jurisdiction; and

• Overhead Costs - these costs will be allocated within Northern Virginia based onthe direct costs as calculated for each jurisdiction.

I Core carriers are operators of local paratransit services that participate in theMetroAccess Regional Paratransit System. Core carriers, as carrier of first choice in theirjurisdiction, are committed to operating as many paratransit trips as capacity permits.

2 Contract service providers are those carriers who provide paratransit services,under contract with WMATA.

AJlocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction-- OperatingPage 174

The proposed and the jurisdiction allocation are based on the rates in the contract effective midJanuary 2000 as follows:

July Through Mid-DecemberMid-December, 2000 Through

Monthly Fees 2000 June 2001

Vehicle Lease per Vehicle $1,100 $1,098

Reservation/SchedulingCost per Trip Requests $3 $3

Vehicle Operating Cost PerTrips Completed $24 $23

Eligibility - Interviews Only- Per Interview $14 $14

Eligibility - Interview andTesting - Per Individual $65 $65

These rates are then used to estimate the cost to each jurisdiction based on projected data for:

.. vehicles required

.. total trip requests including core trips

.. trips completed using MetroAccess

.. certifications and re-certifications for eligibility

.. average trip length - Virginia jurisdictions only

On June 8, 2000, WMATA's Board of Directors modified the Fiscal 2001 contract fundingauthority on the paratransit contract. This modification also authorized WMATA to assumeresponsibility for operating the paratransit core services for Prince George's County and FairfaxCounty on September 1, 2000 and October 1, 2000 respectively.

Table 4 presents estimates of the data listed above and the allocated cost for the District ofColumbia, Montgomery County, Prince George's County and total Northern Virginia. Table 5presents the data and allocated cost for each Northern Virginia jurisdiction.


D. WMATA DEBT SERVICE

In December 1993, WMATA and the Federal Government refinanced the $997 million of transitrevenue bonds issued in the 1970's to construct the Metrorail Adopted Regional System. TheAuthority refinanced its one-third share of bonds ($332.3 million) by issuing $334,015,000 ofgross revenue transit refunding bonds at varying coupon rates ranging from 2.75% to 6.00/0.The objectives of the refinancing were to:

(1) generate funding for the capital improvement program;(2) take advantage of the suppressed bond market;(3) maintain the current annual net cost to WMATA and the jurisdictions of

$27,484,194; and(4) maintain the original bond maturity date of July 1, 2014.

The refinancing generated $54 million of proceeds for the capital improvement program.

The allocation of the local share remains as in all prior year budgets and is based on the railconstruction formula for the Adopted Regional System using data developed for the ProposedFinancial Plan, August 1978. The local shares remain as set forth in the Ancillary BondRepayment Agreements and are not revised as the data used for the rail construction formulais updated.

E. FISCAL 1999 AUDIT ADJUSTMENT

In May 1999, the Authority recognized that there would be a significant budget surplus at theend of fiscal 1999 of approximately $20.1 million. At the same time, the jurisdictions werereviewing the recommended Fiscal 2000 Operating Budget. To give the jurisdictions maximumflexibility as to the use and flexibility of year-end budget savings, the Board of Directorsapproved Resolution #99-24, stating that ... "a jurisdiction may utilize immediately its share ofthe estimated fiscal 1999 savings ... subject to subsequent adjustments as a result of the finalaudited subsidy for each jurisdiction. The actual year-end savings were $20,515,500. Table6 shows the computation of the final audit adjustment for fiscal 1999 by mode and byjurisdiction, as well as a comparison of the final adjustment to the estimate.

F. SUMMARY

Table 7 presents the state and local funding requirements for fiscal 2001.


-uQ)

coCD

» TABLE 1

0 METROBUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE() REGIONALQ)

d.FISCAL 2001 SUMMARY OF STATE/LOCAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS0

::J

0-to.

enCC" PRINCEen DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S CITY OF ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLSa: COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL'<C" REGIONAL· BASE PER RESOLUTION #98-27 $65,054,000 $19,174.000 $22.132.000 $7,765.000 $11.970,000 $135.000 $17,420.000 $649.000 $144,299,000-< FISCAL 1999 SERVICE CHANGES:L ROUTE C8 EXPANSION ($50.600) $280.200 $270,500 ($7.100) ($12.200) $600 $300 ($700) $481.000c: ROUTE F1/2 LOOP ($3.000) ($4.000) $11.900 ($500) ($700) ($700) $3.000,

FISCAL 2000 SERVICE CHANGES:Cii· DC SMALL BUS $228.000 ($28.000) ($29,000) ($11.000) ($17.000) $0 ($14.000) ($1,000) $128,000a.n MID-CITY LINE $60,000 $90.667 $109.333 $36.000 $57,333 $1,333 $74,667 $2.667 $432,000

!:!'. FISCAL 2000 BUS SERVICE GUIDELINES $1,002,000 $695.000 $353.000 $51,000 $56,000 $4.000 $721.000 $9,000 $2.891.000

0 FISCAL 2000 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT ($1,528,478) ($448.678) ($506.048) ($187,920) ($289.842) ($2,205) ($436,322) ($16,807) ($3.416,300):J FISCAL 2001 SERVICE CHANGES:

I FISCAL 2001 BUS SERVICE GUIDELINES $690,100 $955.600 $697,200 $141.400 $268,400 $4,200 $567,800 $2,400 $3.327,100I

0TECHNJCAl SKILLS PROGRAM - YEAR 2 $397,618 $125.857 $139.964 $47,306 $73,096 $868 $111,374 $3,916 $900.000NEW ADVERTISING CONTRACT REVENUES (1.189,243) (376,429) (418.622) (141.490) (218.624) (2.597) (333.111) (11,712) (2,691,829)

-0 NEW REGIONAL BUS SERVICE 1.031.000 445.000 445.000 558.000 133,000 3,000 168.000 4.000 2.787.000CD.., BRANCH AVENUE BUS SERVICE PLAN - 5.5 MON 250,000 11,000 (126.000) 5.000 7.000 16.000 0 163,000Q) CONVERT sMARTMOVER TO REGIONAL 43.000 786.000 19.000 (3,000) 2.000 675,000 1,522.000d. ENHANCED MARKETING 108.049 33.901 37.957 12.630 20.260 409 30,344 1,448 245.000~

co WASHINGTON NAVY-YARD sHUffiE 127.000 (14.000) 18.000 36,000 (6.000) 163,000BRANCH AVENUE TO KING STREET 150,000 46.000 1901000 17,000 26,000 43.000 1.000 473,000WEEKEND LATE CLOSING TO 2:00 A.M. 330.211 96,941 109,304 40,597 62.611 476 94,270 3.630 738.040ADDITIONAL STRATEGIC BUSES 238.601 75.500 84,000 28.400 43,900 500 66,800 2.299 540,000TRAINING AND ACCELERATED RECRUITMENT 110,449 34,960 38.879 13.141 20.304 241 30.937 1.088 250,000DIESEL FUEL 327.393 103.629 115.245 38.951 60.186 715 91,704 3.224 741.048WORKER'S COMPENSATION (53.753) (16.680) (35.100) (3,815) 0 0 (20.651) 0 C130.000)

TOTAL REGIONAL $67,320,346 $22,068,469 $23,638,514 $8,420,601 $12.294,726 $148.541 $19.300.412 $653.452 $153,845,059

-0» TABLE 3Ol-eo-m g

METROBUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE~Q)n NON-REGIONAL....... _.oog

0FISCAL 2001 SUMMARY OF STATE/LOCAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS

.....--(J)

PRINCECC'" DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S CITY OF ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLSCJ) COLUMBIA COUNlY COUNlY ALEXANDRIA COUNlY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTALc:'<C--< NON-REGIONAl BASE PER RESOLUTION # 98-32 $12.975.919 $3.930.347 $9.214.738 $594.462 $0 $0 $5.247,334 $0 $31,962,800

'- FISCAL 1999 SERVICE CHANGES:C OYSTERILEWIS SCHOOL SERVICE $100,700 $100,700::::!. 1-270 EXPRESS SERVICE: J8. J9 $512.000 $512,000CI'J RESTRUCTURE kETTERING SERVICE: C22,23,25,26 ($66,900) ($66,900)a. EXTEND ROUTE 28C TO NVCC $421.600 $421,600n FISCAl 2000 SERVICE CHANGES:,...o' DC SMALL BUS $591.000 $591,000

:J MID-CllY LINEI BRANCH AVENUE - BUS REVENUE LOSS $200.000 $200.000I

EXTEND ROUTES 3T.W,Z TO TYSON'S - WESTPARK0 TRANSPORTATION CENTER $35.000 $35,000"0 M20 $2,000 $2,000CD B9. H8. K2. M4 $357,000 $357,000....,Q) W2.6,e $289.000 $289.000!:!'. 12C.E.F $217.400 $217,400::J

CO FISCAL 2001 SERVICE CHANGES:BRANCH AVENUE BUS SERVICE PLAN· 5.5 MONTHS 584,000 253.000 837,000UNION STATION TO DULLES 750.000 750.000ENHANCED MARKETING 23.982 7,442 15,660 1,702 0 0 9.213 0 58.000WEEKEND LATE CLOSING TO 2:00 A.M. 37.004 13,583 22.438 3.087 0 0 5.847 0 81.960DIESEL FUEL 86,399 26.811 56.417 6,132 0 0 33.193 0 208.952

TOTAL NON-REGIONAL $15,797,004 $4.490.183 $9.695.353 $1.026,984 $0 $0 $5,547,987 $0 $36,557,512

""tJQ)

COCD

»oowC.o::J

o-h

(j)CC"ena:-<C-<Lc:.,(j)'e.o,.....o·::III

ouCD..,Q)~.~

CO

TABLE 4

ALLOCATION OF METROACCESS COSTS AND REVENUES

ESTIMATED METROACCESS USAGE DURING FISCAL 2001:

EUglbflitV CertificationVehicles Trip Requests MelroAccess Medica! TestingRequired Incruding Core Trips Compteted Interviews Plus Interviews

Jurisdiction

District of Columbia 35 251.020 201528 649 278

Montgomery 59 350,686 331991 991 424

Prince George's 25 227,025 151110 608 261

Virginia 19 167.563 98231 755 324

Total 138 996.294 782.860 3.003 1.287

COMPUTATION OF SUBSIDY:

Direct Operating CostsVehicle Reservation! Vehlcte Direct Allocation of Revenue:Lease Scheduling Operating Operating % Distribution Overhead Eligibility Eligibility Tests Completed TripsCost Cost Cost Cost of Dlrect Costs Costs Interviews and Interviews Total Cost Minus Companions Subsidy

Composite Unit Cost for Fisca' 2001 $1100/month $3.01/trip $23.22 $14.00 $65.00 $2.20 fare

Jurisdiction

District of Columbia $461.740 $756.524 $4.678,110 $5.696.374 25.63% $338.215 $9.086 $18.075 $6.261.750 $346.067 $5.915,683

Montgomery $780.315 $1,056.897 $7.706.573 $9.543.785 41.49% $547,430 $13.874 $27,586 $10,132,676 $569,961 $9.562.715

Prince George"s $329.814 $684.208 $3,508.419 $4,522.441 19.66% $259,406 $8.512 $16.950 $4,801.308 $259.527 $4.547.781

Virginia $250.681 $505.001 $2,285.301 $3.040.983 13.22% $174.430 $10.570 $21.045 $3,247,028 $110,394 $3.076,634

Total $1.822.550 $3,002.630 $18.178.403 $23.003.583 100.00% $1.319,481 $42,042 $83.656 $24.448.762 $1.345.949 $23,102.813

TABLE 5

""0»0>- ALLOCATION OF METROACCESS COSTS AND REVENUESCOoCD (') AMONG THE NORTHERN VIRGINIA JURISDICTIONS~w

r+OJ -.

ESTIMATED METROACCESS USAGE DURING FISCAL 2001:og0 Eligibility Certification-h

(J) Trip Requests MetroAccess Trip Length Medical Testingc

Including Core Trips Completed Factor Interviews Plus InterviewsC'"C/)

~ Jurisdiction-<C"'

Alexandria 14,048 7881 1.06 50 21'<'-c Arlington County 30,387 2694 1.11 222 95..,(ii'e. Fairfax City 3,301 2685 1.00 25 100,.....O· Fairfax County 119.004 84388 0.94 456 195:J•r Falls Church 822 584 0.88 3 20"0 Total 167,562 98,232 756 323CD~

OJct.::J COMPUTATION OF SUBSIDY:(Q

Reservation! Direct Revenue:Scheduling Operating Overhead Eligibility Eligibility Tests Completed Trips

Cost Cost Costs Interviews and Interviews Total Cost Minus Companions Su~sidy

Composite Unit Cost for Fiscal 2001 $3.01 trips completed weighted by $14.00 $65.00 $2.20 faretrip length factor

Jurisdiction

Alexandria $42,339 $219,290 $15.398 $700 $1,380 $279,109 $15,349 $263,760

Arlington County $91,581 $78,870 $5,538 $3,108 $6,180 $185,279 $4,624 $180,655

Fairfax City $9,949 $71,107 $4,993 $350 $676 $87,076 $4,607 $82.469

Fairfax County $358,653 $2,153,087 $147,544 $6,384 $12,690 $2,678,360 $144.820 $2,533.540

Falls Church $2,478 $13,629 $957 $42 $105 $17,213 $1,003 $16.210

Total $505,000 $2,535.983 $174.430 $10,584 $21,031 $3,247,037 $170,403 $3,076.634

TABLE 6

1c'lseAL 1999 AUDIT COMPARED TO FISCAL 1999 BIU.sAND ESTIMATED AUDIT ADJUsrMENT

»SUMMARY OF STATE/LOCAL OPERATING REQUJREMENTS OPERATING

00m

PRINCE~.0 DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S CJTYOF ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS VIRGINIA::J COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH SUBTOTAL TOTAL

0 METROBUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE-h -------------------------------en BILLED $78.J11.700 $21,615,968 $29,564,348 $8.996.516 513.012.892 $44.993 $24.124.553 $790.040 $46.968,994 $176.261.010C REGIONAL $65.666.713 $16.613.826 $20.249.125 58,441.167 $13.012.892 $44.993 519,479,441 $790.040 $41.768.539 SI44.298.203C'" NON-REGIONAL $12.444.987 $5.002.142 59.315.213 S55S,349 $0 $0 $4.645,106 $0 $5.200,455 $31.962.801~.a. BILLING FOR NEW SERVICE $31.000 $335.000 $240,000 5240.000 $606.000-< Oyster School Route 18 Extend Rte. 28e

CT$78.142.700 $21.950.968 $29.564.348 $9.236.516 $47.208.994'< TOTAL BILLED $13,012.892 $44.993 $24.124,553 $190.040 $176,861.010

L AUDITC REGIONAL $64.014.238 $16.195,746 519,739.564 $8.228.749 $12,685.428 $43.861 $18.989.255 $770.159 $40,717.451 $140.667.000..,Cir NON-REGIONAL $11.920,596 $4,791.368 $8.922.710 $531.948 $0 50 $4.449,371 $0 $4.981.325 S30.616,000a.

NEW SERVICE (NON-REGIONAL) 531,000 $335.000 $140,000o· 5606.000,.... TOTAL AUDITED $75.965.834 $21.322.114 $28.662.275 S9,000,691 $12.685.428 $43,861 $23.438.632 $770.159 $45.698.776 $171,889,000O·::J

AUDIT ADJUSTMENT ($2,176,866) ($628,854) ($902.073) ($235.819) ($327.464) ($1.132) ($685.921) (S19,881) ($1,510,218) ($4.978,010)I,ESTIMATED ADJUSTMENT (SI.600.000) ($400.000) ($600.000) ($100.000) ($200.000) SO ($400,000) SO ($700.000) ($3,300,000)

0ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENT ($516.866) ($228.8S4) ($302.073) ($135.819) ($127.464) ($1.132) ($285.921) (519,881) ($810.218) ($1.678,010)'U

CD.., METRORAll OPERATING ASSISTANCE - INCLUDES MAX FARE SUBSIDYQ) ..-......_._._•.•...._._----_.----_._-----------_........_---.-.-d. BILLED $37.412,840 $20,542.480 $16.278.828 $4.714.756 $10.682.732 $349.148 $14,914,732 $305.888 $31.037.256 5105.171.404:::Jce

AUDIT $31.074,560 $17,209.589 $13,696.330 $3.902.619 S8,818,581 $286.458 $12.761,489 $2S5.S18 $26,024.665 $88.005.144

AUDIT ADJUSTMENT ($6.338,280) ($3.332.891) ($2.582.498) ($822~131) ($1.864.151) ($62.690) ($2,213.243) ($50.370) ($5.012,591) ($17,266.260)ESTIMATED ADJUSTMENT ($6.900.000) ($3,500,000) (52.900.000) ($900.000) ($2.000,000) ($100,000) ($2.600.000) ($(00,000) ($5.10C).()oo) ($19.000.000)

ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENT $561.720 $167.109 $317.502 $77.863 $135.849 $37.310 $386,757 $49.630 $687.409 $1.733.740

FEDERALLY INELIGIBLE COSTSBILLBD $863.156 $486.112 $414.672 $104.664 $224.008 $4.384 $305.188 $3.020 $641,264 $2.40S.204AUDIT $762.134 5429.220 $366.141 $92.415 SI97,791 $3.869 $269.468 $2,665 $S66.209 $2,123,704AUDIT ADJUSTMENT ($101.022) ($56,892) ($48,531) ($12,249) ($26.217) (SSIS) ($J5.720) ($355) ($15.055) ($281,500)ESTIMATED ADJUSTMENT JY 1.2 ~ 1Q M! IQ ~ ~ 1Q 1QADDITIONAL ADJUSTMBNT ($101.022) ($56.892) ($48.531) ($12.149) ($26.217) ($515) ($35.720) ($355) ($75.0SS) ($281.500)

PARATRANSIT._.....................__......._---_..__..B1LLBD $4,335,220 $1.814.256 52.479,100 $171.112 $214,368 $25.512 $1.511.192 $31,344 $1.953,528 $10.582,104AUDIT $3,314,253 $4.814.709 $2,597.604 $185.167 5201.040 $48.306 $1,411,591 $19,699 $1.865.809 SI2.592.375

"0 AUDIT ADJUSTMENT ($1.020.967) $3,000.453 S118,504 $14.055 ($13.328) $22.194 ($99.595) ($11.645) ($81.719) $2.010.271W(C ESTIMATED ADJUSTMENT ($500.000) $2.600.000 $2.100.000

CDADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENT ($520.967) $400.453 $IJ8,S04 514,055 ($13,328) $22.794 ($99.595) ($11.645) ($87.719)

~

($89.729)

00~ TOTAL AUDIT ADJUSTMENT ($9.637.13S) ($1,018,184) ($3.414.598) ($1,056,150) ($2.231.160) ($41.543) ($3.034,479) ($82.251) (56,445,582) ($20.515.499)

ESTIMATED ADJUSTMENT (8.900.000) (1,300,000) (3.500.000) (1.000.000) (2~200.000) (100.000) (3.100.000) (100,000) (S6.500.000) • (20.200,000)

ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENT ($737,135) $281.816 $85,402 ($56.150) ($31.160) 558.457 $65.521 $17.749 $54.418 ($315.499)

"1J)"> TABLE 70)=COoCD 0 FISCAL 2001 SUMMARY OF STATE/LOCAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS (1)~Q)

M00 _.Ng

0 PRINCE.... DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S CITY OF ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS

en COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY gn:. COUNTY CHURCH TOTALCC" METROBUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE:en REGIONAL $67.320.346 $22.068,469 $23,638.514 $8,420,601 $12.294.726 $148.541 $19.300.412 $653.452 $153.845,059a: NON-REGIONAL $15,797.004 $4,490,183 $9,695,353 $1,026,984 IQ JQ $5547.987 IQ $36,557,512-< TOTAL BUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE $83,117,350 $28.558.851 $33.333.888 $9.447.585 $12.294,728 $148.541 $24.848.399 $653,452 $190.402.5710-'< METRORAIL OPERATING ASSISTANCE:L BASE AlLOCATION $44,994,089 $21.958.015 $19.957.566 $5.331.953 $12.129.555 $366.214 $16.915.037 $342.301 $121.994.729C MAX. FARE SUBSIDY $218,974 $1.607.940 $509.234 $66.491 $53.065 $33,885 $697.200 $9910 $3,196,700-c TOTAL RAIL OPERATING ASSISTANCE $45,213.083 $23.585,955 $20,488.800 $5.398.444 $12,182,820 $400,099 $17.612,237 $352.211 $125.191,429iii"a.

PARATRANS1T $5,958,261 59,612,760 $4,582.681 $266,916 $182,070 $82,625 $2,550,304 $16,605 $23,2522230Z. FISCAL 2001 W/O DEBT SERVICE $134.288.674 $59.737,366 $58.383.349 $15.112.945 $24.659,415 $631.266 $45.0101940 $1.022.268 $338.846.2230::J

$4.872.948I DEBT SERVICE $10.331.309 $4.867,451 $1.418.184 $2.740.174 $46,723 $3.168.927 $38,478 $27.484.194I

0 TOTAL fiSCAL 2001 REQUIREMENT $144,619,983 $64,604,817 $83,258,297 $16.531,129 $27.399.589 $677.989 $48.179,867 51.080.748 $368,330,417UCD

FINAL FISCAL 1999 AUDIT ADJUSTMENT (1) ($9.637.135) ($1.018.184) ($3.414,598) ($1.056.150) ($2.231.160) ($41.543) ($3.034,479) ($82.251) ($20.515,500)..,Q)~,:;:]co

(1) Jurisdictions may use this credit for bills due in fiscal 2000; they may reserve the savings for fiscal 2001; or may use the savings for other programs

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYFISCAL 2001 JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTSINFRASTRUCTURE AND RENEWAL PROGRAM

SUMMARY

The Infrastructure Renewal Program for fiscal 2001 is supported by $677.3 million ofFederal, State, and local subsidy contributions, debt financing, and investment income.Most of this year's program, seventy-two percent, will be funded with $481.3 millionof debt financing, similar to that established to support the 'fast-track' rail constructionprogram in 1991. New federal grants, including flexible funds and local match, areprogrammed at $162.4 million. The repairable parts reserve and new procurements ofrepairable parts will require $5.0 million of 100 percent statellocal funds. Funding of$24.9 million from previously approved grants will be reprogrammed to the fiscal2001 program element. The remaining funding is from investment income projectedat $1.5 million and additional local funding of $2.2 million.

Table 1 summarizes the projects in fiscal 2001 and assigns the costs to theappropriate mode and formula allocation categories, e.g., Metrobus, MetrobusRepairable Parts, Metrorail Category I, Metrorail Category II, and Rail Repairable Parts.Table 2 presents the allocation of state/local requirements among the jurisdictions.These requirements include 20 percent local match for projects funded with federalgrants, the 100 percent local funding for the depreciation of repairable parts and thepurchase of new repairable parts inventory and the additional local funding. All localfunds are expected to be billed in fiscal 2001. The following generally describes theformulas and procedures used to allocate each cost category.

(1 ) Metrobus Capital Projects and Bus Repairable Parts

The local match for bus capital items is distributed among the local jurisdictions usinga projection of the weekday revenue bus miles. This was projected for fiscal 2001using actual schedule data for September 1999. Table 3 presents the estimatedweekday revenue miles for fiscal 2001.

(2) Metrorail Capital Projects - Category I

Category I projects are defined as system deficiencies including items whose actuallife is significantly less than planned and whose replacement will correct design orquality deficiencies and extend the life of the equipment, and/or save on operating andmaintenance costs. The local share of cost for these items is allocated using the latestestimate of the rail construction formula.

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction -- Infrastructure and Renewal ProgramPage 183

(3) Metrorail Capital Projects - Category II

Normal replacement and rehabilitation programs for the rail system in operation areallocated among the local jurisdictions using the past five year average of rail operatingassistance percentages. The fiscal 2001 bills will use the average of rail operatingassistance distributions for Fiscal 1995 through Fiscal 1999. Table 4 presents thefiscal 2001 distribution of category II local costs.

(4) Rail Repairable Parts: Depreciation and New Procurements

Repairable parts are part of the normal replacement and rehabilitation program. Assuch, the cost is allocated in the same manner as category II costs - using the past fiveyear average of rail operating assistance percentages.

(5) Bus Capital One-tenth Adjustments

One-tenth of each year's billing for bus capital projects is adjusted using a distributionof actual miles. Ten adjustments to each year's bills occur over a ten-year period.This procedure was implemented to allow each jurisdiction's contribution to moreaccurately represent the benefits received by the jurisdiction. This does not apply tobus capital projects supported by the flexible funding program.

Table 5 presents the one-tenth adjustments using actual fiscal 1999 weekday revenuebus miles. The adjustments are due July 1, 2000.

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction -- Infrastructure and Renewal ProgramPage 184

»ooQ),.....o'::J

o-h

(J)C000Q.

-<0-'<Lc::::!.00C-O.-+o·::J

:J-h-,OJen~..,c:C')....c:..,CDEll:Ja.:uCD::JCD~Q)

\J~

o(0..,m

'1J3Q)

enCD~

CO(J1

TABLE 1

FISCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM BUDGET(In thousands of dollarsl

FUNDING SOURCES

100% LOCAL ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT

ALLOCATION FLEXIBLE REPAIRABLE NON-FEDERAL INCOMEI DEBT REPROGRAMMED

PROJECTS: CATEGORY SECTION 9 SECTION 3 fUNDS PARTS FUNDING SUBTOTAL OTHER FINANCtNG fUNDING III TOTAL

RAIL CAR PROCUREMENT RAIL CAT. 1 $0 $24,896 $24,896RAIL CAR REHABILITATION RAIL CAT. 2 1.902 $1,902 $408,201 $410,109EMERGENCY RAil REHABILITATION RAIL CAT. 2 $10,556 $10,556 $10,666STATION STRUCTURES &

EQUIPMENT REHABILITATION RAtLCAT.2 $19.042 $43,817 $62,919 $62,919RAil MAINTENANCE RAIL CAT. 2 $2,700 $2,700 $253 $2.963OTHER RAIL PROJECTS RAIL CAT. 2 $5.644 $10.038 $5,000 $2.162 $22.844 $14.682 $7,045 $44.671

BUS PURCHASES BUS MilES $1.190 $8,064 $9,244 $23,205 $2.674 $35,123ANNUAL BUS OVERHAUL BUS MilES $18,416 $18,415 $18,415SOUTHEAST BUS GARAGE BUS MilES $4,473 $4,473 $4,473OTHER BUS PROJECTS BUS MILES $25,085 $25,085 $26,085JOINT BUS & RAil BUS MILES $11.373 $11,373 $1.500 $10.069 $16.225 $38.161

TOTAL $98,418 $66,817 $8,054 $5.000 $2,162 $169,511 $1,500 $481.312 $24.944 $677,267

LOCAL MATCH:

FLEXIBLE FUNDING· BUS $1,611 1,611

OTHER BUS ITEMS $12.107 $0 eo 12.107

BUS REPAIRABLE PARTS 0RAIL CATEGORY I $0 $0 $0 eo 0

RAIL CATEGORY II $7.588 $11,163 eo $2,162 20,914RAIL REPAIRABLE PARTS $5,000 6.000

0TOTAL LOCAL $19,696 $11.163 $1.611 $5.000 $2.162 $39,632

(11 The local match for reprogrammed funding was billed and paid in prior years.

N:\FY2001lClp12OO'CIPUW2 OW,2ItIO 2:08:5f PM

-0» TABLE 2

w-COo<Do~Q) FISCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM BUDGET,...00 _.mg

STATE AND LOCAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS0~

enc:

PRINCE0-en DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS0.: COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL-<C--< FLEXIBLE FUNDING MATCH:

c.. BUS PROJECTSC

FEDERAL $2,366,465 $1,018,322 $1,402,364 $335,160 $450,552 $0 $869,109 $21,248 $6,443,200""'"en" LOCAL $589,114 $254,680 $350,591 $83,788 $1 t 2,638 $0 $214,777 $5,312 $1,610,800a.o· TOTAt FLEXIBLE FUNDING $2,945,669 $1,272,902 $1,762,954 $418,938 $563,190 $0 $1,073,886 $26,560 $8,054,000,...0

SECTION 9 MATCH::JBUS PROJECTS $4,427,936 $1,913,494 $2,635,134 &629,769 $846,617 $0 $1,614,323 $39,926 $12,107,200

RAIL CATEGORY 2 $2,784,184 $1,388,374 $1,178,023 $347,397 $794,505 $22,917 $1,050,690 $22,310 $7,588,400::J TOTAL SECTION 9 MATCH $7,212,120 $3.301,868 $3,813,157 $977,166 $1,641.123 $22,917 $2,665,013 $62.236 $19,695,600........-cQ)en

SECTION 3 MATCH:r-+..,$0 $0 $0 $0 $0C BUS PROJECTS $0 $0 $0 $0

0 RAIL CATEGORY 2 $4,095,851 $2.042.456 $1,733,006 $511,060 $1,168.808 $33,713 $1,546,684 $32,820 $11,163,400,.....C TOTAL SECTION 3 MATCH $4,095,851 $2.042.456 $1,733,006 $511,060 $1,168,808 $33,713 $1,546,684 $32,820 $11,163,400..,CDm

ADDITIONAL NON·FEDERAL:::J0.. BUS PROJECTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

:0 RAil CATEGORY 2 $793.238 $395,560 $335,629 $98,976 $226,361 $6,629 $299,351 $6,356 $2,162,000<D

TOTAL ADD1L. NON·FEDERAL $793,238 $395,560 $335,629 $98,976 $226,361 $6,529 $299,351 $6,356 $2,162,000::JCD~ REPAIRABLE PARTS:Q)

BUS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0-0

RAIL $1,834,500 $914,800 $776,200 $228,900 $523,500 $16,100 $692,300 $14,700 $5,000.000..,0

TOTAL REPAIRABLE PARTS $1,834,600 $914,800 $776,200 $228,900 $523,500 $15,100 $692,300 $14,700 $5,000.000CO-.Q)

3 TOTAL LOCAL WID FLEX. $13,935,709 $6,654,683 $6,657,992 $1,816,103 $3,559,792 $78,260 $5,202,348 $116,113 $38.021,000

TOTAL LOCAL PLUS FLEX. $16,881,278 $7,927,686 $8,410,947 $2,235,041 $4,122,982 $78,260 $6,276,234 $142,673 $46,075,000

BUS CAPITAL ONE-TENTH

ADJUSTMENT ($67,888) $1,991 $81.617 ----------•••--------------.- NVTC ($1 5,720 ) ••••••-.------..---..---...•••••. $0

N:lFY2001\Clp\2001CIP1.WB2 09112/00 2:09:34 PM

(J)cC'"en~-<0--<LC..,CirC-o~.o::l

:J""""h..,menrl..,Co,.....c:~

CD0>::JC.

::nCD::JCD~0>

-0..,oco..,Q)

""03m(CCD

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

PRINCE GEORGE1S COUNTY

MARYLAND SUBTOTAL

ALEXANDRIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY

FAIRFAX CITY

FAIRFAX COUNTY

FALLS CHURCH

VIRGINIA SUBTOTAL

TOTAL

TABLE 3

FISCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM

ESTIMATED FISCAL 2001 WEEKDAY REVENUE BUS MILES

TO ALLOCATE BUS CAPITAL PROJECTS

WEEKDAY DECEMBER PLANNED ESTIMATED FISCAL 2001

REVENUE 1999 FISCAL 2001 CHANGES WEEKDAY REVENUE MILES

MILES AS OF CHANGES GUIDELINES NEW SERVICE

SEPT. 20, 1999 RTE.C2 MILES DISTRIBUTION

10,478,916 0 96,114 80,925 125,994 10,781,949 36.5727%

4,405,781 (50,000) 124,139 179,407 4,659,327 15.8046%

6,315,138 50,000 9,849 41,520 6,416,507 21.7650%

10,720,919 0 9,849 165,659 179,407 11,075,834 37.5696%

1,382,946 0 31,276 45,523 73,734 1,533,478 5.2016%1,883,187 0 42,589 61,989 73,734 2,061,499 6.9927%

0 0 0 0

3,722,027 0 86,303 122,519 3,930,849 13.3336%

94,122 0 0 3,098 97,220 0.3298%

0

7,082,282 0 160,168 233,129 147,467 7,623,046 25.8576%

28,282,117 0 266,131 406,752 452,868 29,480,829 100.0000%

N:\FY2001\Clp\2001CIP1.WB2 09112/00 2:16:12 PM

TABLE 4"""0»0)-COo RSCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE AND RENEWAL PROGRAM

CD 0~Q) ALLOCATION OF LOCAL MATCH FOR RAIL RELIABILITY PROJECTS· CATEGORY 2rl00 _.oog

0-h PRINCE(J) DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLSC COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTALtT(f)

c:-< DISTRIBUTION OF

0- RAil OPERATING

-< ASSISTANCE:

LC FY1981 45.13% 10.69% 16.39% 3.3696 14.99% 0.29% 8.77% 0.38% 100.00%~

en' FV1982 45.18% 10.5396 16.76% 3.27% 14.23% 0.29% 9.39% 0.35% 100.00%a. FY1983 47.381)6 10.67% 16.15% 3.26% 13.72% 0.29% 8.329& 0.31% 100,0096O· FY1984 46.1996 10.44% 16.08% 4.63% 13.04% 0.26% 9.18% 0.28% 100.00%&""'+

FY1985 43.24% 14.96% 14.70% 6.28% 11.78% 0.25% 9.56% 0.23%O· 100.00%

::J FY1986 41.87% 17.19% 14.38% 5.04% 11.29% 0.26% 9.71% 0.26% 100.00%

FY1987 40.11% 16.91% 14.23% 4.70% 11.32% 0.30% 12.18% 0.2596 100.00%

FY1988 39.97% 16.95% 14.34% 4.6996 11.25% 0.30% 12.24% 0.26% 100.00%

::::J FY1989 39.89% 17.03% 14.26CJ& 4.58% 11.7096 0.31% 11.97% 0.27% 100.0096-h FY1990 39.61% 16.9396 14.66% 4.64% 11.49% 0.32% 12.21% 0.25% 100.00%..,Q) FY1991 38.43% 18.03% 14.36% 4.68% 11.50% 0.33% 12.37% 0.30% 100.00%en,... FY1992 39.38% 17.77% 14.05% 4.86% 10.90% 0.34% 12.41% 0.30% 100.00%-,

FY1993 41.52% 17.34% 13.77% 4.64% 10.38% 0.31% 11.80% O.241jf, 100.00%C() FY1994 37.4396 18.54% 14.47% 4.6696 10.68% 0.30% 13.63% 0.29% 100.00%I"""f'C FY1995 36.92% 18.28% 15.43% 4.62% 10.58% 0.29% 13.58% 0.30% 100.00%...,

FY1996 36.7996 18.32% 16.51% 4.61% 10.64% 0.31% 13.63% 0.29% 100.00%CDQ) FY1997 36.84% 18.28% 16.66% 4.60% 10.61% 0.31% 13.61% 0.29% 100.00%

:::J FY1998 36.51% 18.11% 16.56% 4.54% 10.40% 0.30% 14.22% 0.30% 100.00%C. FY1999 36.33% 18.49% 15.66% 4.52% 10.32% 0.30% 14.19% 0.2996 100.00%

:JJCD FIVE YEAR AVE.::::JCD~

FY1981-1985 45.42% 11.44% 16.02% 3.94% 13.65% 0.28% 9.04% 0.31% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1987 COMMITMENTS

Q) FV1982-1986 44.77% 12.74% 16.61% 4.28% 12.81% 0.27% 9.23% 0.29% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1988 COMMtTMENTS

FY1983·1987 43.76% 14.01% 15.11% 4.56% 12.23% 0.27% 9.79% 0.27% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1989 COMMITMENTS"'1J FY1984·1988 42.28% 15.29% 14.75% 4.85% 11.74% 0.27% 10.57% 0.26% 100,00% USED TO Bill FY1990 COMMITMENTS""""0 FY1986·1989 41.02% 16.61% 14.38% 4.86% 11.47% 0.28% 11.13% 0.26% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1991 COMMITMENTS

CO FY1986·1990 40.27% 17.00% 14.37% 4.73% 11.41% 0.30% 11.66% 0.26% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1992 COMMITMENTS-,Q) FY1987·1991 39.58% 17.17% 14.37% 4.66% 11.45% 0.31% 12.19% 0.27% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1993 COMMITMENTS3 FY1988·1992 39.44% 17.34% 14.33% 4.69% 11.31% 0.32% 12.2496 0.28% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1994 COMMITMENTS

FY1989-1993 39.75% 17.42% 14.22% 4.68% 11.1996 0.32% 12.16% 0.27% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1996 COMMITMENTS

FY1990·1994 39.25% 17.72% 14.26CJ6 4.69% 10.99CJ6 0.32% 12.48% 0.28% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1996 COMMITMENTSFY1991·1996 38.74% 17.99% 14.42% 4.69% 10.81% 0.31% 12.16% 0.29% 100.00% USED TO BilL FY1991 COMMITMENTSFY1992-1996 38.41% 18.05% 14.65% 4.68% 10.62% 0.31% 13.01% 0.28% 100.00% USED TO BilL FY1998 COMMITMENTSFY1993-1997 37,90% 18.15% 14.95% 4.63% 10.54% 0.30% 13.26% 0.28% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1999 COMMITMENTS

FY1994-1998 36.91% 18.31% 15.31% 4.61% 10.54% 0.30% 13.73% 0.29% 100.00% USED TO BilL FY2000 COMMITMENTS

FY1996·1999 36.69% 18.30% 16.52% 4.58% 10.47% 0.30% 13.86% 0.2996 100.0096 USED TO BILL FY2001 COMMITMENTS

N.\FV200"Cip\200fClPUVB2 mv'2IOO '2:f5:Ofi PM

TABLE 5

» FISCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE AND RENEWAL PROGRAM0(')

BUS CAPITAL 1/10th ADJUSTMENTSQ),...FY 1999 ADJUSTMENTo·

:3

0 Prince-h

en District of Montgomery George's Northernc 1/10th of Original Billing Columbia County County Virginia TotalC"ena:

FY1990 - 10th ADJUST $272.986 $94.553 $108,959 $178,302 $654.800"<0'" FY1991 - 9th ADJUST $154.925 $55,549 $67.880 $103,424 $381,778-< FY1992 - 8th ADJUST $188,556 $70.112 $84,239 $129.547 $472,454Lc: FY1993 - 7th ADJUST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0....,

FY1994 - 6th ADJUST $32,110 $11,207 $15,199 $22,285 $80.801Cj;"c. FY1995 - 5th ADJUST $157,558 $57,049 $79.149 $108,108 $401,8640

FY1996 - 4th ADJUST $123.587 $47,838 $73,300 $85.849 $330,574~.0 FY1997 - 3rd ADJUST $104,436 $41,258 $62,080 $72,235 $280,008:::J

FY1998 - 2nd ADJUST $70,554 $27,150 $43.174 $47,247 $188,126FY1999 -1st ADJUST $305,995 $119,044 $187.623 $203,338 $816,000

:J""""h....,

$1.410,707 $523,759 $721,603 $950.336 $3.606,405Q)en~..,c FY1999 DISTRIBUTION()

OF ACTUAL WEEKDAY,...c:...., REVENUE MILES 37.2343% 14.5782% 22.27200/0 25.9154% 100.0000%CDQ)

::JC.

:Xl REVISED DISTRIBUTION $1,342.819 $525.750 $803,220 $934,615 $3,606,405CD::JCD~ ADJUSTMENT DUEw'1J

JULY 1,2000 ($67,888) $1.991 $81.617 ($15.720) $0..,0co..,m

"1J3Q)

(Q

CD~

00CD


FISCAL 2001 JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTSRAIL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

THE FORMULA

On January 9, 1970, WMATA, the Washington Suburban Transit District (WSTD) inMaryland, the counties of Arlington and Fairfax in Virginia, the cities of Alexandria,Fairfax, and Falls Church in Virginia, and the District of Columbia executed a CapitalContributions'Agreement which established the basis for local contributions for the railconstruction program. Included in the document is a Guaranty Agreement betweenWMATA and Montgomery and Prince George's Counties in Maryland guaranteeing fulland prompt payment by the WSTD.

The Agreement sets out a formula to allocate all local costs, with the exception of addon costs, for the Adopted Regional System (ARS) using four sets of percentdistributions:

Factor

Construction

Service

RidershipPopulation

Weight Given1

To Each Factor

40%

30%

15%15%

Factor Description

Cost in 1969 dollars to place constructionin each signatory.

1990 train miles and stations in each. 2

signatory .1990 ridership in each signatory's area.1990 population within the Transit Zone.

The term Ilsignatory" in the factor description refers to the signatories to the WMATAinterstate compact, namely, the District of Columbia, the State of Maryland, and theCommonwealth of Virginia. The construction and service factors are computed aftereliminating the costs, stations, and train miles attributable to the Modified Sector Zero(MSO) portion of the system. This means that each jurisdiction shares in the cost ofsector zero in proportion to its share of non-sector zero cost, stations, and train miles.The geographic boundaries as agreed to in 1970 are:

1 The allocation to Virginia is computed using the factors as weighted on the above chart. Thesuballocation among the Virginia jurisdictions weights each factor 25 percent.

2 Within the service factor, the weighting of the components has been 7.5% for station distributions and22.5% for train mile distributions.

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction -- Rail Construction ProgramPage 190

• Northern boundary - The Potomac River east to Rock Creek and up to L Street;east on L Street to

• Eastern boundary - First Street, N.E.; south on First Street to• Southern boundary - Southwest Freeway to the vicinity of 6th Street, S.W.,

southerly to the D.C./Virginia boundary, then westerly to and including thePentagon;

• Western boundary - along a line from the Pentagon north to the intersection ofWilson Boulevard and Fort Myer Drive and east to the Potomac River.

The initial set of data used for the allocation formula was developed from the 1969Net Income Analysis Study, Council of Governments (MWCOG) population forecastsfor 1990, and engineering cost estimates for the entire construction program. Thiswas used to compute the Schedule A, Capital Receipts Schedule (the original paymentschedule) in the Capital Contributions Agreement. Revisions to the data base thatactually adjusted billin,g to the jurisdictions were implemented as follows:

• In 1974, jurisdiction payments were re-allocated using 1990 ridership and trainmile forecasts for the 98 mile system prior to the addition of the Shady GroveRoad extension. The data was developed as part of the 1974 Net IncomeAnalysis Study and included revised MWCOG population projections for 1990and revised base year dollar costs (1969 dollars) for the Adopted RegionalSystem.

• In 1978, MWCOG concluded an extensive Alternatives Analysis Study on allunbuilt segments of the Adopted Regional System, except the segment from

Silver Spring to Glenmont3 • This effort essentially reaffirmed the need for theARS and recommended several changes in alignments. Using much of the datadeveloped for the Alternatives Analysis Study, WMATA contracted for aDetailed Financial Analysis (DFA) for the 101 mile system. DFA forecasts of1990 ridership and 1990 train miles were used in the allocation formula forICCA-II, ICCA-III, and ICCA-IV.

• In 1982, a jurisdiction task force was appointed by the WMATA Board toreview the formula data for an amendment to ICCA-Ili. The task force agreedto use updated construction costs for the 101 mile system and the MWCOGRound 3 population forecasts for 1990. Due to concerns regarding theassumptions and bases used for the 1980 Net Income Analysis Study, the taskforce agreed to continue using the 1978 DFA data for the service factor of theformula.

3 UMTA, now FTA, conceded the need for this segment prior to the Alternative Analysis and requiredonly an engineering analysis on this segment.


• In 1991, the WMATA Board appointed a jurisdiction task force to review theformula data and procedures in order to develop the payment schedule forICCA-V. Concurrent with this effort, WMATA completed a financial analysisstudy for the 103 mile system using the MWCOG forecast year of 201 0 todetermine the ridership, population, and service factors. The task force couldnot reach consensus on the appropriate forecast year to use' as the basis for thefinal computation of local shares. It was agreed that the commitment schedulein ICCA-V should be updated every two years until the system is completed andthat the data used to update the population and ridership factors of the formulawould be based on a 50%/50% composite of the latest FAS year 2010 dataand the best available current population and ridership data. The actual andprojected data for population and ridership should converge over time, therebyminimizing the final recomputation. The Board of Directors also approved theallocation of the Southern Avenue Station in the service factor of the formulato the District of Columbia and Prince George's County using peak periodboardings by jurisdiction of residence. Table 1 shows the distribution for eachfactor in the formula as updated in December 1995.

THE CONSTANT DOLLAR CONCEPT

In 1981, a jurisdiction task force developed a payment schedule for ICCA-1I1. ICCA-1I1was to complete funding for nearly 75 miles of the Metro System:

Shady Grove to Silver Spring on the Red Line;Vienna to New Carrollton on the Orange Line;Huntington to Addison Road on the Blue Line; andthe southern Potomac River crossing (Fenwick Bridge) between GalleryPlace and the Pentagon on the Yellow Line.

There was considerable concern that most of the unfunded system segments were inMaryland and the District of Columbia. Annual payments in previous contributionsagreements had been allocated among the jurisdictions based on each jurisdiction'sshare of the ARS formula. The concept put forth by Maryland DOT staff was that thepayment schedule should in some way reflect the rate at which constructionprogressed or work was funded in each jurisdiction.

It was agreed that the rail construction formula for the full ARS must remain intact.The formula would determine the ceiling or maximum amount that each jurisdictionwould pay for the ARS. However, the annual payments due from each jurisdiction forICCA-III would be computed using data for that portion of the system funded throughICCA-1I1 (nearly 75 miles). The same allocation formula would be used, but the database would be for a projected 75 mile system.

The impact of this precedure was to bill at a faster rate those jurisdictions that had all


or most of their system funded through ICCA-III, because they would have a higherpercentage of a 75 mile system than of a 103 mile system. The jurisdictions thatwould pay faster expressed concern that they would be paying in more expensivedollars. It was then agreed that:1. All costs associated with construction of the system (ARS) beginning with

December 1, 1981 would be computed in 1981 dollars;2. The allocation of the share each jurisdiction must pay for the total ARS would

be computed in 1981 dollars;3. Annual local payments would be computed in current dollars;4. Payments made prior to ICCA-1I1 would be reallocated using the allocation for

the 75 mile system and any adjustments would be phased in over a five-yearperiod;

5. Each payment would be devalued to 1981 dollars using the WMATAconstruction index (January 1981 = 100) for the month of the payment;

6. When the 1981 dollar value of a jurisdiction's payments reaches its total shareof the ARS (Step 2), that jurisdiction, in essence, would be paid up unless thereare changes to system scope, unanticipated changes in base year (1 981 ) dollarcosts, or changes in the federal/local match ratio.

This concept and the same procedures have been used to develop the ICCA-IVpayment schedule using a data base for the 89.5 mile system and the ICCA-V LocalCommitments Schedule using a data base for the 103 mile system.

ICCA-V BILLING PROCEDURES

All jurisdictions have provided all the required written commitments for the fast-trackprogram. The level of commitment among the jurisdictions may be modified every twoyears. ICCA-V requires a recomputation of each jurisdiction's commitment every twoyears based on updated data in the allocation formula. The fiscal 2001 expenditureceiling is based on an update in November 1997 of the construction factor and theMWCOG round V.4 population forecast for year 2010. Exhibit 4 shows actualcommitments through fiscal 1999.

The local funding agreements between WMATA and each PoliticalSubdivision/Guarantor require that a cumulative monthly billing ceiling be establishedand incorporated into the annual budget. The billing ceiling for fiscal 2001 ispresented on the following page.


\1»m-co-eD g~a>

r-+(0 _.

~g EXHIBIT 4 - REVISED RCPMT -95 12-Sep-OO

0-h

enc METRORAIL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS SCHEDULErr(J)

LOCAL COMMITMENTS TO FUND THE LOCAL MATCH FOR P.L. 101-551lc'<Cj FIFTH INTERIM CAPJTAL CONTRIBUTIONS AGREEMENT

-<L (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)C-.,Cii·C. ADD-ONS IN THE SERVICE FACTOR

o· SOUTHERN AVENUE - 73% PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTYr-+ - 27% DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAo·::J

PROGRAM DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY PRINCE MARYLAND ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS VIRGINIA::JJ YEAR COLUMBIA COUNTY GEORGE'S CO SUBTOTAL ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH SUBTOTAL TOTALQ)-n0::JrJ) FISCAL 1992 17.689.74 12.034.73 13.228.18 25,262.91 1.552.08 3.656.97 34.54 9.096.48 19.28 14.359.35 57.312.00r-+..., FISCAL 1993 28.358.87 19.293.17 21.206.43 40.499.60 2.488.18 5.862.58 55.38 14,582.79 30.90 23.019.83 91.878.30c0 FISCAL 1994 36,817.44 25.047.69 27,531.64 52,579.33 3,230.29 7.611.19 71.93 18,932.43 40.08 29.885.92 119,282.69,...+ FISCAL 1995 37,424.20 25.579.53 27,622.10 53,201.63 3.219.56 7.313.11 111.91 18,066.59 63.00 28,774.17 119,400.000 FISCAL 1996 37,424.20 25,579.53 27,622.10 53.201.63 3.219.56 7.313.11 111.91 18.066.59 63.00 28,774.17 119,400.00::J

""UFISCAL 1997 39,219.85 23.664.19 32,290.77 55.954.96 2,261.88 6,594.86 111.90 15.193.57 62.98 24,225.19 119,400.00

-., FISCAL 1998 39.219.85 23.664.19 32,290.77 55.954.96 2,261.88 6.594.86 111.90 15.193.57 62.98 24.225.19 119,400.000 FISCAL 1999 11,486.90 9.459.20 1.926.50 11.385.70 (239.40) 3,276.90 28.20 4,093.00 15.90 7,174.60 30.047.20co...,Q)

3 --- --- ---- ---- --- ----- ----- ---- ---TOTAL 247,641.05 164.322.23 183.718.49 348,040.72 17.994.03 48.223.58 637.67 113,225.02 358.12 180.438.42 776.120.19

lJQ)roCD

»o(')Q),.....o'j

o-t\

::0Q)

nojen,..-,c::(')

~.o:::J

"1J..,oco.,Q)

3

FISCAL 2001 ESTIMATE OF BILLS:

JULY 2000AUGUST 2000

SEPTEMBER 2000OCTOBER 2000

NOVEMBER 2000DECEMBER 2000

JANUARY 2001FEBRUARY 2001

MARCH 2001APRil 2001

MAY 2001JUNE 2001

RAIL CAPITAL PROGRAM BUDGET • 103 MILE SYSTEMCUMULATIVE MONTHLY CEILING FOR FISCAL 2001 CASH PAYMENTS

PRINCEDISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS VIRGINIACOLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL TOTAL

4.279.090 2.723.330 3.164,130 219.468 788.548 12.071 1.681.064 6.799 2.707.950 12,874.5006.552.497 4,170,189 4.845.177 336.067 1,207.490 18.484 2.574,185 10,411 4,146,637 19.714,5009,147,471 5.821.701 6,764,005 469,159 1.685,690 25,805 3.593,635 14,534 5.788.823 27.522.000

10.984,643 6.990,928 8.122.483 563,384 2.024,243 30.988 4.315,378 17.453 6,951.446 33.049,50013.402.630 8,529.801 9,910.439 687,399 2.469.829 37.809 5.265.298 21,295 8,481,629 40,324,50018,114,764 10.255,878 11,915.900 826,500 2.969.619 45,460 6,330.775 25,604 10.197,958 48.484,50017,883,385 11.381,477 13.223,688 917.210 3,295,540 50,449 7,025.587 28,415 11.317,200 53,805,75019,633.310 12,495,177 14.517.653 1,006,960 3.618.015 55.385 7.713,055 31,195 12.424,610 59,070,75021.6071584 13,751,659 15,977,510 1.108,218 3,981,833 60,955 8.488,660 34,332 13,673.997 651010.75023.011.014 14.644,840 17,015.262 1.180,197 4,240,456 64.914 9.040,005 36,562 14.582,134 69.233,25024,577,721 15.641.935 18,173,747 1,260,551 4,529.168 69,333 9.655.494 39,051 15.553.597 73.947,00026,579,415 16.915.869 19,653,880 1,363,215 4,898,039 741980 10,441.871 42.231 16,820,336 79,969,500

This Page Not Used


RESOLUTIONS OF THE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Resolutions of the Board of DirectorsPage 197

This Page Not Used

Resolutions of the Board of DirectorsPage 198

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYRESOLUTIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

1. Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula (98-27)

2. Non-Regional Metrobus Subsidy Allocation (98-32)

3. Interjurisdictional Funding Agreement (98-38)

4. Operating Budget Reprogramming Policy (99-21)

5. Paratransit Formula (99-31)

6. Fiscal 2001 Guidelines and Assumptions (99-41)

7. Create an Integrated Annual Work Program (99-55)

8. Reimbursable Project Policy and Project Reserve Funds (99-63)

9. Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services (00-10)

10. Fiscal 2001 - 2006 Infrastructure Renewal Program (OO-34)

11. Extension of Metrorail Operating Hours (00-39) ,

12. Fiscal Year 2001 Operating Budget (00-40)

13. Policy for Travel to APTA, COMTO & UITP Functions (00-41)

14. Changes to the Procurement Statement (00-42)

15. Revised IRP Reprogramming Policy (00-43)

16. 103 mile Rail Capital Program BUdget - Fiscal 2001 (00-44)

11. System Improvement and Expansion Program Budget - Fiscal 2001 (00-45)

17. Carryover Fiscal 2000 IRP Funds into Fiscal 2001 (00-47)

Page 199

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JUNE 25, 1998SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF METROBUS SUBSIDY ALLOCATION FORMULA

#98-27RESOLUTION

OF THEBOARD OF DIRECTORS

OF THEWASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel (RMP), created in January 1997, wascharged with devising a plan to stabilize and enhance bus services in the NationalCapital Region; and

WHEREAS, in reviewing the current Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula andits impact on the future o.f Metrobus services in the National Capital Region, the RMPconcluded the following in regard to the current formula:

• it relies on outdated information and reduces management1s ability toimplement system cost savings because these actions may result in costincreases in some jurisdictions; and .

• jurisdictions that reduce bus service save more than the resulting systemsavings and jurisdictions that increase bus service pay more than theresulting system increases; and

• as Metrobus service is reduced in anyone jurisdiction, the unit costs forall remaining bus service increases resulting in cost increases injurisdictions that do not change their service; and

WHEREAS, the RMP has recommended, and the Board of Directors has agreed,that a revised Metrobus subsidy allocation formula for regional Metrobus service beimplemented beginning in Fiscal 1999; and

WHEREAS, the Board anticipates that the Member Jurisdictions will agree thatconversion to the new' Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula will begin in Fiscal 1999with phased transition limits during the period of Fiscal 1999-2002 (as previously

Page 200

adopted by the Regional Mobility Panel) and that the phased non-federal share offunding for the $100 million rehabilitation and replacement shortfall requirements willbegin in Fiscal 2000 and continue through Fiscal 2003. Beginning in Fiscal 1999, andin every year thereafter, the benefit to all Member Jurisdictions from the applicationof phased transition limits .in the new Regional Bus Service Operating SubsidyAllocation Formula will be reduced proportionate to the lowest percentage contributionmade by any benefitting Member Jurisdiction to the phased non-federal shortfall in theRehabilitation and Replacement Program, including any state funds attributable to thatjurisdiction.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the current Metrobus subsidyallocation formula be revised, as recommended by the RMP and agreed to by the Boardof Directors, and that a new Metrobus subsidy allocation formula be implementedthrough a transition plan beginning in Fiscal 1999 and continuing through Fiscal 2002;and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Directors adopts a new MetrobusSubsidy Allocation Formula that: allocates the regional Metrobus subsidy on a regionalbasis; uses data that can be periodically updated; allocates the Metrobus subsidybased on benefits received in each jurisdiction; and evaluates carefully the mechanismsto implement a ridership incentive factor; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following Metrobus Subsidy AllocationFormula for regional Metrobus services shall be adopted based on each jurisdiction'sshare of the following four factors:

• 25 % of Subsidy - a weighted average of urbanized population andpopulation density using 1990 census data and the 1990 populationdefinition of the urbanized area;

• 15% of Subsidy - weekday ridership on the regional routes by jurisdictionof residence;

• 35 % of Subsidy - annual revenue miles for the regional routes; and

• 25 % of Subsidy - annual revenue hours for the regional routes.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Directors adopts the attachedtransition limits to be applied to each jurisdiction for Fiscal 1999 through Fiscal 2002as the basis for phasing in the revised Metrobus Regional Subsidy Allocation Formula;and

Page 201

J urisdiclion Annual Regional Metrobus Subsidies With Transition LimitFiscal 1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001 Fiscal 2002

District of Columbia 65,136 65.095 65,054 65,013

Montgomery County 17,686 18,430 19,174 19,918Prince George's County 20,350 21.241 22,132 23,Q23Maryland 38,036 39,671 41,306 42,941

Alexandria 8,402 8,084 7,765 7,447

Arlington County 13,013 12,491 11,970 11,448Fairfax City 45 90 135 180Fairfax County 18.877 18,148 17,420 16,691

Falls Church 790 719 649 578

Virginia 41,127 39,533 37,938 36,344

Total 144,298 144,298 144,298 144,298

...

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the revised Metrobus Subsidy AllocationFormula, as modified by the transition limits prescribed for Fiscal 1999 through Fiscal ~

200~ attached hereto, shall become effective in Fiscal 1999 and shall remain in effectuntil changed by the Board of Directors; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall become effectiveimmediately.

Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency.

J?~Robert L. Poll<General Counsel

Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Wineland, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 6 - Mr. Barnett, Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Wineland, Mrs. Walker

and Mr. Kinlaw

Page 203

PRESENTED: JUNE 25, 1998ADOPTED; JULY 9, 1998SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF NON-REGIONAL METAOBUS SUBSIDY ALLOCATION

#98-32RESOLUTION



WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel (AMP), created in January 1997, wascharged with devising a plan to stabilize and enhance bus services in the NationalCapital Region; and

WHEREAS, the RMP recommended a new Metrobus service plan based on thedevelopment of regional and non-regional bus routes so that neither the regional bussubsidy nor any individual jurisdiction's subsidy is affected by any change that mightoccur in non-regional services except for the jurisdiction proposing the change; and

WHEREAS, in reviewing the current Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula andits impact on the future of Metrobus services in the National Capital Region, the RMPproposed a new Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula for regional Metrobus servicesbeginning in Fiscal 1999 and continuing through Fiscal 2002, with specified annualtransition limits; and

WHEREAS, based on the recommendations of the RMP, the Board of Directorshas approved a revised Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula for regional Metrobusservice to be implemented through a transition plan beginning in Fiscal 1999 andcontinuing through Fiscal 2002; and

WHEREAS, Metrobus subsidies are determined separately for regional and nonregional Metrobus services; and

WHEREAS, as a result of approval by the Board of Directors of a new MetrobusSubsidy Allocation Formula for Regional Metrobus service only, a new subsidyallocation mechanism for non-regional Metrobus services must be approved beginningin Fiscal 1999.

Page 204

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Metrobus subsidy for non-regionalMetrobus service shall be computed by utilizing the following steps:

1. Identify the costs of a.1f Metrobus service, regional and non-regional;

2. Identify the costs which would accrue for regional Metrobus service if no nonregional bus service were provided;

3. Determine the costs of non-regional service by subtracting the regionalMetrobus costs from the costs of all Metrobus service;

4. Divide the costs for non-regional service as computed in step three by totalplatform hours for non-regional service;

5. Jdentify the non-regional platform hours for each jurisdiction;

6. Multiply the platform hours for each jurisdiction by the hourly rate.

7. Determine the revenue for each jurisdiction; and

8. Subtract the revenue as determined in step seven from costs.

The product from the process, as outlined above, equals subsidy by jurisdiction.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the revised Metrobus Subsidy Allocation processfor Non-Regional Metrobus services shall become effective in Fiscal 1999 and shallremain in effect until changed by the Board of Directors; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall become effective immediately.


!ku~/-!~ It&Robert L. Polk ZJGeneral couns:

Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Wineland, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 6 - Mr. Barnett, Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Wineland, Mr. Zimmennan, and Mr. Evans

Page 205

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: AUGUST 13, 1998SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF INTERJURISDICTIONAL FUNDING AGREEMENT

#98-38Resolution

of theBoard of Directors

of theWashington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

WHEREAS, the U.S. Congress, in the 1997 U. S. Department of TransportationAppropriations Act, directed the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) toconduct an independent study to analyze how to meet current and future bus transportation needsfor the greater Washington metropolitan region through the year 2020; and

WHEREAS, the WMATA Board of Directors appointed the Regional Mobility Panel, agroup of regional government, business, labor and citizen leaders, in January 1997 and chargedthat panel with the responsibility of addressing the concerns expressed by Congress concerningthe rising costs and fragmentation of regional bus services; and

WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel provided its recommendations on improvingregional mobility and on transit funding in two reports to the WMATA Board of Directors; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors reviewed the reports and recommendations of theRegional Mobility Panel and accepted them for implementation in cooperation with the localjurisdictions of the Washington metropolitan area;

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and Member Jurisdictions have worked to develop anInter-Jurisdictional Funding Agreement for Bus Service and WMATA Rehabilitation andReplacement Program that will implement the recommendations of the Regional Mobility Panel;and

WHEREAS, the Agreement will delineate responsibilities for the planning, funding andservice delivery of Regional and Non-Regional Bus Services, establish a new funding formula forRegional Bus Services similar to the regional Metrorail formula, create a Coordinated ServicePlanning process to provide for the efficient integration of bus services in the Transit Zone, andprovide for certain pledges regarding the adequacy of funding and the maintenance of averagebus passenger fares and Regional bus subsidies through FY 2002 for the same level of Regionalbus service; and

WHEREAS, the Agreement establishes a commitment by the Member Jurisdictions topursue, support and implement necessary legislative and other actions in the MemberJurisdictions, the statest and the federal government to fully fund the average annual $100 millionshortfall in the WMATA Rehabilitation and Replacement Program; and

Page 206

WHEREAS, the Member Jurisdictions have approved and signed the Inter-JurisdictionalFunding Agreement for Bus Service and WMATA Rehabilitation and Replacement Program.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors approves the InterJurisdictional Funding Agreement for Bus Service and WMATA Rehabilitation and ReplacementProgram and authorizes the Chairman of the Board to execute the Agreement on behalf of theAuthority;

BE IF FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall be effective immediately.


Robert L. Polk, General Counsel

Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Wineland, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 6 - Mr. Barnett, Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Wineland, Mr. Zimmerman, and Mrs. Mason

Page 207

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: MAY 13, 1999SUBJECT: REPROGRAMMING POLICY

#99-21RESOLUTION



WHEREAS, the Authority Board of Directors approves an annual operatingbudget by department and by expense category and establishes the total number ofauthorized positions for the Authority; and

WHEREAS, the Authority Board of Directors has approved Resolution #97-31(Attachment A) establishing procurement procedures and providing thresholds forprocurements which require approval of the Board of Directors; and

WHEREAS, in approving the Fiscal 1999 Operating Budget (Resolution #97-21,Attachment B), the Authority Board of Directors resolved that expenditures whichexceed $25 thousand for programs not defined or provided for in the budget shallrequire Board approval; and

WHEREAS, from time to time approval by the Board of Directors may berequired for adjustments to approved staffing and expenditure levels;

NOW I THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the following actions affecting theoperating budget shall require approval of the Board Budget Committee prior tosubmission to the Board of Directors:

• Any action that requires an increase in the total number of positionsAuthority-wide; and

• Any action that requires a transfer of funds between the personnel and.non-personnel categories of expense; and

• Any action which meets the threshold for Board approval and results ina cumulative increase of $200,000 in operating funds during the fiscalyear:• from other than the category in which it is budgeted; or• from other than the department in which it is budgeted; or• in excess of the amount budgeted for any given category in any

department; and

• Any professional and technical services contracts over $50,000 and anyunbudgeted professional and technical services contracts over $10,000;and

Page 208

,.'

• Any expenditures which exceed $25 thousand for programs not definedor provided for in the budget and/or any new initiative which has out yearoperating budget impacts; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effectiveimmediately.

Rev·ewed as to form and legal sufficiency.

.A

Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Graham, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmennan, Mr. Graham and Mr. Barnett

Page 209

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JUNE 10, 1999

SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARATRANSIT FORMULA'

# 99-31RESOLUTION

OFTHEBOARD OF DIRECTORS


WHEREAS, the Regional Paratransit Coordinating Cor:nmittee has reviewed the current fourtiered formula used to determine each jurisdiction's 'share of the MetroAccess subsidy and hasconcluded that a new allocation formula is needed; and

WHEREAS, the Board Budget Committee has reviewed and agrees with changes to theMetroAccess formula as proposed by the Regional Paratransit Coordinating Committee; and

WHEREAS, the proposed MetroAccess formula more accurately assigns the cost of theMetroAccess service to the jurisdiction served.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that, beginning with fiscal 2000, WMATA'sMetroAccess costs will be allocated among the District of Columbia, Montgomery and PrinceGeorge's Counties in Maryland, and Northern Virginia as an entity, as follows:

• Direct Costs - the contract carriers' actual per trip, reservation, and eligibilitycharges will be allocated directly to jurisdictions; and

• Overhead Costs - all other costs of the paratransit program will be allocated inproportion to the direct costs; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Northern Virginia jurisdictions of Arlington and FairfaxCounties, and the Cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, and Falls Church have determined an appropriateprocedure for WMATA to further allocate costs within Northern Virginia:

• Direct Costs - per trip charges will be adjusted to reflect the average time of tripsprovided for each jurisdiction; and

• Overhead Costs - these costs will be allocated within Northern Virginia based on thedirect costs as calculated for each jurisdiction; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall become effective for fiscal 2000 andshall remain in effect for subsequent fiscal years unless changed by the Board of Directors; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall become effective immediately.


Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.~~,'Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham and Mr. Barnett

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JULY 22, 1999

SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PROPOSED GUIDELINES AND ASSUMPTIONS

#99-41

RESOLUTION

OF THE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

OF THE


WHEREAS, the General Manager has proposed guidelines and assumptions for

developing the Fiscal 2001 Operating Budget and the Fiscal 2001-2006 Capital

Improvement Program; and

WHEREAS, the Board Budget Committee recommends approval of such

guidelines and assumptions.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors approve the

Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program Guidelines and Assumptions

contained in Attachment A; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon approval of the Board of Directors this

resolution shall become effective immediately.


,Cheryl C. rke

General Counsel

Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.~i(~o§,'~JfQttc1~~1cMftiR~e5'~dMr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham and Mr. Barnett

Page 211

July 22, 1999

ATTACHMENT APROPOSED FISCAL 2001 BUDGETGUIDELINES AND ASSUMPTIONS

The General Manager will present the Proposed. Operating Budget and CapitalImprovement Program requests, including jurisdictional allocations, to the BoardBudget Committee in December 1999.

Operating Budget

The proposed operating budget will include a summary of each program, personneland non-personnel costs, revenues, staffing levels, and an explanation of significantchanges from the prior year budget.

All buses, trains and equipment must be operated and maintained in a manner toensure customer and employee safety.

There will be no fare increase.

Continue integration of bus and rail passenger revenues.

The Outer Green Line from Anacostia to Branch Avenue will begin operations inMarch 2001.

The total su.bsidies for bus, rail and paratransit service shall not exceed $313.2 million(exclusive of debt service), except for:

• the addition of inflation on the subsidy of Metrorail service; and

• the annualization of service approved in fiscal 2000; and

• any new services added in fiscal 2001, including the opening of the OuterGreen Line from Anacostia to Branch Avenue, and any service associatedwith the bus service guidelines.

All federal mandates will be funded.

Proposals will be made for service options to accommodate increasing ridershipdemands on existing service levels.

Proposals will also be made to enhance and expand existing service levels to furtherencourage increased ridershio.

Page 212

Capital Improvement Program

"The CIP will include a summary indicating the cost of projects, source of funds, otherbudget and staffing requirements, the local jurisdictional contributions in support ofthe fiscal 2001 program, and an explanation of the changes compared to fiscal 20002005.

System preservation and safety will continue to be the top priorities.

Assume continuation of a $25 million ramp-up in fiscal 2001, per theInterjurisdictional Funding Agreement.

The CIP will cover fiscal 2001 for approval purposes, fiscal 2002 through fiscal 2006for planning purposes, and fiscal 2007 through fiscal 2010 for information purposes.

No funds should be requested in fiscal 2001 for planning or execution of projects thatare not reasonably expected to be committed in fiscal 2001. Any funds notcommitted in fiscal 1999 should be separately identified and proposed to the Boardfor consideration as part of the fiscal 2001 budget.

Staffing

There will be no increase in Authority-wide positions in fiscal 2001 except for newservices and any Board approved reimbursable projects.

Proposed Authority-wide staffing changes and position conversions will be separatelyand specifically identified.

Reimbursable orojects and staffing for reimbursable projects will be separately andspecifically identified.

Page 213

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: SEPTEMBER 23, 1999SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO INTEGRATE FOUR CONSULTANT SERVICESCONTRACTS INTO A CONSORTIUM OF INTERESTS AND CREATE ANINTEGRATED ANNUAL WORK PROGRAM

#99-55RESOLUTION



WHEREAS, the Authority has entered into four separate contracts withDMJM/DeLeuw Cather, JV, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Raytheon and Booz Allen &Hamilton for professional and technical services; and

WHEREAS, the four contracts provide professional services to eleven internalclients, and the services are funded from several funding sources; and

WHEREAS, the four contracts have various expiration dates, with Contract3Z800A and 32800B expiring in August of 2003, Contract 3Z203A expiring in Juneof 2003, and Contract FG-1451 expiring in June of 2000; and

WHEREAS, the Authority's CIP program is a six year program, and terminatesin June of 2005; and

WHEREAS, the professional services provide the greatest benefit to theAuthority if they are coterminous with the CIP program; and

WHEREAS, wide ranging professional services are provided in the mostexpedient and cost-effective manner when coordinated through a single entity; and

WHEREAS, the four existing contractors have agreed to form a consortiumcalled Capital Transit Consultants (eTC) and executed an agreement to provide asingle administrative and management team to WMATA; and

WHEREAS, the four contractors have further agreed to an extension to theircontracts through June, 2005, which will make them coterminous with the CIPprogram; and

WHEREAS, the extension of the contracts beyond a five year period has beenapproved by FTA; and

Page 1 of 2

Page 214

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THATTHE Board of Directors desires thatthe Authority obtain its consulting services in the most beneficial and cost-effectivemanner; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board authorizes the General Manager toapprove the consortium concept by endorsing the agreement reached by theConsortium to provide WMATA a single entity for the management and coordinationof the consulting services.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board authorizes the execution of contractmodifications to the four existing contracts to extend the period of performancethrough June 2005 to be coterminous with the Capital Improvement Program; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board authorizes the General Manager toimplement a six-year Integrated Annual Work program subject to annual approval offunding; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board authorizes the General Manager toimplement the first year of the integrated annual work program; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the funding requirements in excess of: totalbudget approved tor the program; funding approved by individual funding sources; andamounts budgeted tor projects or category shall require Board approval.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall be effective immediately.


Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham & Mr. Barnett

Page 2 of 2

Page 2·15

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 1999SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A

REIMBURSABLE PROJECT POLICY AND PROJECT RESERVE FUNDS

#99-63RESOLUTION



WHEREAS, from time to time the Authority is called upon to provide assistanceand services on behalf of the local jurisdictions, state governments, and other entities;and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors encourages staff to support, to the extentpossible, requests by the local jurisdictions and state governments that are of benefitto the Authority, provided that such projects do not affect the approved annualoperating, capital improvement program or rail construction budgets or subsidies; and

WHEREAS, over the past several years, the number and complexity ofreimbursable project requests have been increasing so as to require a definitive setof policy guidelines for recommending such requests to the Board Budget Committeefor review and to the Board of Directors for approval; and

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors encouragesstaff to support, to the extent possible, requests for reimbursable projects by the localjurisdictions and state governments that are beyond the annual operating, capitalimprovement program and rail construction budgets and subsidies approved by theBoard of Directors; and

1. That a Reimbursable Project, excluding adjacent construction projects,charter bus services, and projects with a full funding grant agreementshall be classified as either Reimbursable Services/Projects orReimbursable Fixed Price Contracts and shall be fully funded (includingall direct and indirect costs, insurance, and associated overhead costs),and paid for by the entity requesting the project; and

Page 1 of 4

Page 216

2. That upon request by a local jurisdiction, state government, or otherentity, the General Manager shall present to the Board BudgetCommittee for review and to the Board of Directors for approval, aproject description, staffing, funding and duration of each request for areimbursable project; except the General Manager may approveReimbursable Projects with participating jurisdictions and stategovernments, provided that such projects do not require additionalpositions and do not exceed $200,000; and the Board will be notified inadvance of such actions; and

3. That the General Manager shall ensure that staffing and funding for aReimbursable Project wiIJ be available so as to not require any staff orfunds from the operating, capital improvement program or rail capitalbudgets or subsidies; and

4. That funding for all Reimbursable Projects shall be available in advance,except those under a Reimbursable Fixed Price Contract which may bepaid in arrears; and

5. That pricing for all Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts with an arrearspayment schedule will include the cost of money; and

6. That either signed arrears payment contracts or funds for advancepayments must be in place before work on a project begins; and

7. That the funds for Reimbursable Projects are payable within 30 daysafter the billing date, and all accounts that are not paid by the 31 st dayafter billing are considered delinquent and will be assessed a latepayment penalty and interest charge, except that the Authority will beresponsible for any billing errors; and

8. That the Board of Directors will be notified of any Reimbursable Projectfor which payment is 90 days past due, that the project will cease whenpayment is 120 days past due, unless the Board of Directors authorizescontinuation of the project; however, in no case, without approval of theBoard of Directors, will the amount overdue for a project exceed theamount available in the Reimbursable Project Reserve; and

9. That if a project is discontinued for non-payment or non-adherence toproject and funding agreements, the requesting party will be responsiblefor close-out and termination costs; and

Page 2 of 4

Page 217

10. That the Board authorizes and directs the use of the $1.0 million newservice reserve, established by Resolution #98-14, to establish theReimbursable Project Reserve; and

11 . That the Reimbursable Project Reserve shall be additionally funded fromany savings realized at the completion of any Reimbursable Fixed PriceProjects and shall be used to offset potential cost overruns and start-upcosts for Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts, delinquent payments fromany Reimbursable Project, and to cover ineligible costs for reimbursableservices agreements; and

12. That the General Manager is authorized, in the event that theReimbursable Project Reserve balance is inadequate, to borrow from theOperating Claims Reserve, such borrowed funds to be repaid withinterest as reimbursable program funds become available; and

13. That at the completion of a Reimbursable Services/Project, any savingsrealized or shortfalls incurred shall be returned or billed, respectively, tothe participating jurisdiction; and

14. That a Reimbursable Projects Insurance and Claims Reserve will beestablished in an amount necessary to provide appropriate insurancecoverage and funding for claims up to the deductible with the reservelevel reviewed annually by an actuary; and

15. That the Reimbursable Projects Insurance and Claims Reserve will befunded by each project to provide protection for workers compensation,third party claims, errors and omissions, and property damage; and

16. That the General Manager is authorized, in the event that theReimbursable Projects Insurance and Claims Reserve balance isinadequate for insurance deductibles, to borrow from the OperatingClaims Reserve, such borrowed funds to be repaid with interest asreimbursable program funds become available; and

17. That upon completion or termination of a Reimbursable Project, thestaffing positions associated with the project will be deleted andremoved from the Authority's position authorization; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager will provide to the BoardBudget Committee the Policyllnstruction setting forth the procedures for ReimbursableServices/Projects and Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts;

Page 3 of 4

Page 218

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager shall submit to the BoardBudget Committee a quarterly report on the status of the ReimbursableServices/Projects and Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall be effective immediately.


Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Barnett and Mr. Catania

N:\FY2000\RESCLUTN\reimbursable4.wpd

Page 4 of 4

Page 219

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 10, 2000

Subject: Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services

#2000-10 .RESOLUTION

OFTHEBOARD OF DIRECTORS


WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel directed WMATA to take the lead inplanning the regional bus network; and

WHEREAS, bus ridership has grown as a result of increased demand and theimplementation of fare integration measures, necessitating minor changes to theregional bus services; and

WHEREAS, in May 1999 the Board of Directors adopted a set of guidelines foradding service to existing regional Metrobus routes; and .

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors instructed staff to develop similar guidelinesfor reduction of service on existing regional Metrobus routes and for adding newregional Metrobus routes and services; and

WHEREAS, it has been determined that it would be beneficial to extend theperiod of experimental service from one year to two years to enable flexibility torespond to the needs of the developing market;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors adopts theGuidelines for Regional Bus Services dated February 3,2000, which are the May 1999guidelines amended to include new guidelines for the reduction of service on existingregional Metrobus lines and for adding new regional Metrobus lines and services; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board-adopted Rules And Regulations forMetrobus Operations dated October 1996 is hereby amended to state that newMetrobus routes and services may be operated for up to 18 months as "experimentalservice" with the option to extend the period to 24 months at the Board's discretion;and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be effective immediately.

Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency:

¥Q~B~Mr. Barnett, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 4 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, and Mr. Barnett

!lUwashington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR

REGIONAL METROBUS SERVICES

February 3, 2000

Page 221

~ Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services

SECTION I: GUIDELINES FOR ADDING NEW LINES AND SERVICES

The regional mobility plan as adopted, identified WMATA as the lead agency to developa plan for regional bus needs. As the transit needs change within the Washington D.C.region, a guideline is needed to determine when' neWI regional service may beimplemented. Through regional service, Metrobus must meet the needs of emergingmarkets that can support transit.

Identifying markets that can support transit and determining how to serve them is a taskthat WMATA staff will coordinate with the staff of the jurisdictions. Once a new market isidentified, staffwill use passenger demand as the performance measure for implementingnew service. Passenger demand is determined by estimating the number of passengersthat will utilize the service. Staff will recommend new service as needed as part of thefiscal year service plan during the budget process. Service will be developed in concertwith local jurisdictions and presented to the board committees. The recommendation willinclude cost, subsidy, and performance goals for 6 months, 12 months, and,18 months.

SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR INTRODUCING New LINES AND SERVICES

• Determine demand for new service• Semi-annual performance goals will be established• Evaluate new service recommendation to identify potential success• New service will be reviewed every six months to track ridership

One Guideline

• Minimum load factor

Service will be recommended as an experimental line if it has the potential demandto achieve the minimum load factor for its line classification within an 18 monthperiod.

February 3, 2000Page 222

Page 1


The load factor is calculated by determining the number of passengers that passthe maximum Joad point, the number of trips made during the period l and thenumber of seats available on a bus. This load factor differential by line type is asfollows:

Line Classifications Minimum Load Factor

• Radial - operates over major arterials and corridors .65and is oriented toward major urban centers.

• Crosstown - provides service across corridors and. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .55generally does not serve urban centers.

• Express - operates over major travel corridors and . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .50includes significant non-stop segments orientedtoward major centers.

• Off-peak (all service types) .50

ApPLICATION OF GUIDELINES

As part of the on-going planning process staff will analyze the performance of lines usingthe proposed guidelines.

• Specific data will be collected and analyzed with the jurisdictional staff.• Performance goals will be set and service will be reviewed every six months

February 3, 2000 Page 2Page 223


SECTION II: GUIDEUNES FOR ADDING SERVICE TO EXISTING LINES

INTRODUCTION

When a bus service overcrowding problem is identified, staff will review existing data orcollect additional data to identify the cause of the problem. Then staff will investigatealternatives to determine if a no cost solution is possible. The following no costalternatives are typically used by staff:

• integrate headways along a corridor• adjust headways• replace smaller buses with larger buses• have a pull-out or pull-in trip make a revenue trip• redistribute running time• adjust recovery time• short turn trips• reroute to avoid congestion

Only after it is determined that a no cost alternative does not exist will additional servicebe recommended.

SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR ADDING SERVICE TO ExiSTING LINES

• effectively measure service performance• evaluate service adjustments as necessary to ensure application of gUidelines for

entire regional bus network.• on a semi-annual basis service changes will be reviewed to track the impact of the

changes on the budget and ridership.

Four Guidelines

1. load factor (radial, crosstown and express)2. running time3. non-peak productivity standard4. regional equity optional at the Board's discretion


Page 3

~ Service Guidelines for Regional MetrobusServices

1. Load Factor

A service increase is warranted if the ratio of passengers to seats at the maximumload point during the peak half-hour or non-peak hour exceeds the load factor. Theload factor is calculated by determining the number of passengers that pass themaximum load point. the number of trips made during the period. and the numberof seats available on a bus (45). For example: 225 passengers divided by 5 trips,divided by 45 seats, yields a load factor of 1.0. This load factor differential by linetype is as follows:

Line Classification Load Factors

• Radial - operates over major arterials and corridors 1.2and is oriented toward major urban centers.

• Crosstown - provides service across corridors and . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1generally does not serve urban centers.

• Express - operates over major travel corridors and . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0includes significant non-stop segments orientedtoward major centers.

• Off-peak (all service types) 1.0

2. Running Time Adjustments

Service will be added if running time is insufficient and more than 33% of the tripson a linee within a 30 minute period during the peak and 60 minute period duringthe off-peak are not able to start their next cycle on-time.

3. Non-peak Productivity

Service will be increased if ridership averages more than 30 passengers perrevenue hour during non-peak hours (at the increased service level).

4. Regional Equity at The Board's Discretion

New service, line extensions or other service enhancements to new areas will beconsidered as an option to ensure regional equity as determined by relative subsidycontributions. It is at the boards discretion to consider this option.


IlU Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services

ApPUCATION OF GUIDEUNES

As part of the on-going planning process staff will analyze the performance of lines usingthe proposed guidelines. Before staff recommends service improvements, they will firstidentify any no cost alternatives. If staff cannot identify any no cost alternatives then theguidelines will be applied.

. I

• Specific data will be collected and analyzed with the jurisdictional staff.• The specific changes will be proposed.• The changes in service and the financial impact will be analyzed.• The final servi.ce change recommendations will be brought to the Board Operations

and Budget Committees only if there is a budget implication.


PageS


SECTION III: GUIDELINES FOR REDUCING SERVICE ON EXISTING LINES

INTRODUCTION

When a bus service is identified as a candidate for redu~tiont staffwill review existing dataor collect additional data to identify the cause of the problem. Then staff will investigatealternatives to determine if a solution is possible. The following alternatives to reducingservice are typically used by staff:

• Integrate headways along a corridor• Adjust headways• Adjust trips• . Replace larger buses with smaller buses• Short turn trips• Public information

Only after it is determined that an alternative to reducing service does not exist will areduction of service be recommended.

SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR REDUCING SERVICE ON EXISTING LINES

• Effectively measure service performance• Evaluate service adjustments as necessary to ensure application of guidelines for

entire regional bus network.• Service changes will be reviewed on a semi-annual basis to track the impact of the

changes on the budget and ridership.

Two guidelines

1. Load factor (radial, crosstown, express and off-peak)2. Non-peak productivity standard

1. Load Factor

A service decrease is warranted if the ratio of passengers to seats at the maximumload point during the peak half-hour or non-peak hour does not meet the minimumload factor. The load factor is calculated by determining the number of passengersthat pass the maximum load point, the number of trips made during the period, andthe number of seats available on a bus. The goal is to maintain a minimum loadfactor for each line classification. This may require service to be reduced toachieve the minimum goal. The minimum load factor differential by line type is asfollows:


~ Service Guidelines for Relilional Metrobus Services

Line Classification Load Factors

• Radial - operates over major arterials and corridors .60and is oriented toward major urban centers.

• Crosstown - provides service across corridors and. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .55generally does not serve urban centers.

• Express - operates over major travel corridors and . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .50includes significant non-stop segments orientedtoward major centers.

2. Non-peak Productivity

Service may be decreased if ridership averages less than 18 passengers perrevenue hour during non-peak hours and staff determines that a decrease inservice is warranted based on current performance trends. A reduction of servicehours may result in improved performance.

ApPLICATION OF GUIDELINES

As part of the on-going planning process staff will analyze the performance of lines usingthe proposed guidelines. Before staff recommends a service reduction they will firstidentify any alternatives to reducing service. If staff cannot identify any alternatives, thenthe guidelines will be applied.

• Specific data will be collected and analyzed with the jurisdictional staff.• The changes in service and the financial impact will be analyzed.• The final service change recommendations wiff be brought to the board operations

and budget committees only if there is a budget implication.


Page 7

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: MAY 25,2000SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FISCAL 2001-2006

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM

#2000-34RESOLUTION



WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received and considered comments fromthe local jurisdictions on the Proposed Infrastructure Renewal Program forimplementation in Fiscal 2001, for planning purposes in Fiscal 2002 - 2006, and forinformation purposes in Fiscal 2007 - 2010; and

WHEREAS, the Infrastructure Renewal Program provides for the rehabilitationand replacement of existing assets based on funding constraints; and

WHEREAS, the local jurisdictions have approved an Interjurisdictional FundingAgreement through Fiscal 2003 which includes a commitment of federal and/or localresources to meet the requirements necessary to maintain system reliability; and

WHEREAS, the Infrastructure Renewal Program assumes for planning purposesonly, a $25 million increase in additional federal or non-federal funding in Fiscal 2004and Fiscal 2005 to meet the projected requirements of the bus and rail system; and

WHEREAS, in order to meet the funding requirements in Fiscal 2001 andbeyond, the proposed program includes the use of a loan guarantee up to $600million under the Transportation Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act of 1998(TIFIA); and

WHEREAS 1 it is in the best interest of the Authority for the General Manager,or the Chief of Staff, to have standing authorization to apply for funds from theFederal government and any other public or private entity, and to file or providenecessary documents in order to implement the Infrastructure Renewal Program; and

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors approves theFiscal 2001 Infrastructure Renewal Program totaling $677,267,000, including$8,054,000 in flexible funds, as identified on Attachment A; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEO that the Board Budget Committee will re-examinethe General Manager's proposed ramp-up plan beginning in 2006, the out-yearfunding needs of the Infrastructure Renewal Program in Fiscal 2006 and beyond, theprojected ridership increases, the required vehicles and the facilities needed toaccommodate this growth from Fiscal 2001-2025, and report its findings to the Boardby November 2000; and

1 Page 229

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, with the understanding that the BudgetCommittee will re-examine the out-year funding needs, the Fiscal 2002 - 2006Infrastructure Renewal Program totaling $817,591,000, as identified on AttachmentA, is hereby approved for planning purposes and the Fiscal 2007 - 201 0 InfrastructureRenewal Program, totaling $860,023,000, is inc!uded for information purposes; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in order to implement the Fiscal 2001Infrastructure Renewal Program, which involves the obligation of $667 million partiallysupported by the TIFIA loan guarantee, the General Manager is authorized to issuerevenue anticipation notes, revenue bonds, certificates of participation, and otherfinancial borrowing instruments, subject to Board approval of the final papers for eachsuch financial transaction; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Infrastructure Renewal Program is the sameprogram as the Capital Improvement Program referenced in the TIFIA Loan GuaranteeAgreement and related documentation; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall be effective immediately.

Reviewed as form and legal sufficiency.

Cheryl C. BurkeGeneral Counsel

Motion by Mr. Zimmerman. seconded by Mr. Davey, and unanimously·approved.Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack! Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham! Mrs. Hanley, Mr. Davey, and Mr. Sickles

Page 230 2

.TOTALFY01-10

I f I fdFbp toaram eyan Y06 s or n ormation onlyFY07 FYOB FY09 FY 10 TOTAL

FY07·10

(77.974) 31

2,354.881

TOTALFV ot-10

d FY 061 f I fbprogram eyon s or n ormat on on IYFY07 FYOB FY09 F.Y 10 TOTAL

FY07-10

198,675 203.416 216.782 241.150 860.023

265.100 265.100 265.100 265.tOO 1.0&0.400

(66425. (61.684» (48,3181 (23,9501 (200,371)

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT & SUPPORT

~

PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION 2,700 2.900 3.200 3.600 4,000 4,000 20.400CONSULTANT AND ENGINEERING (IAWP) 11 0 8,000 9.000 8.000 8,000 8.000 41,000

TOTAL 2,700 10.900 12.200 11,600 12,000 12,000 61,400

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 21.115 20.700 20.700 20.700 20,700 20.100 124,615

TOTAL 21,115 20,700 20.700 20,700 20,700 20,700 124,815

FINANCING COSTS

TOTAL 1,500 6.700 11.400 13.800 13,600 5.200 52,200

GRAND TOTAL PROJECTS 677,267 206.532 155.572 166.404 151.564 137.519 1,494.858

PROJECTED FUNDING WITHOUT FINANCING 21 195.955 191.100 215.100 240.100 265,100 265.100 1,372.455

FINANCING (PAYBACK) 481.312 15.432 (59.528) (73.696) 1113.538) (127.5811 122.403N~\FY2001\CJP\TABLEI· tOVEARa1265.W83

Noles:1/IAWP estimato for Fiscal 2001 of $16. t million has boen allocaled and included in the abovo proJocls.21 FY 2001 includes addillonal funds of $24.9 million from reprogrammod funds.31 This amounl will be applied as payback for FtscaJ 2000.

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN ARE ~NSIT AUTHORITYTABLE NO.2

FUNDING PROJECTIONS FOR FISCAL 2001 ..2006 IRP(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

FY 01 FY02 FYOJ FY04 FY05 FY06 TOTALS(FED 00) (FED 01) (FED 02) (FED OJ) (FED 04) (FED 05)

TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET WITHOUT FINANCING ~,955 191,100 215,100 240,100 265,100 265,100 1,372,455

TO BE FUNDED BY:

REPROGRAMMED FUNDING 24,944 24.944

SECTION 5307 FEDERAL GRANTS 78,782 78,924 84.803 90,738 90,738 90,738 514,723

20% LOCAL MATCHING CONTRIBUTION FOR SECTION 5307 GRANTS 19,696 19,730 21,200 22,684 22,684 22,684 128,678

SECTiON 5309 RAil MODERNIZATION GRANTS 44,654 53.558 61,599 70,628 70,628 70,628 371,695

20% MATCHING CONTRIBUTION FOR SECTION 5309 GRANTS 11,164 13,390 15.400 17,657 17,657 17,657 92,925

J1

BUS/RAil REHABILITATION INTERNALLY GENERATED FUNDS 1.500 1,500 1,500 1,500 0 0 6,000

LOCAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR REPAIRABLE PARTS ACCOUNTS 5.000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000

ADDITIONAL LOCAL FUNDING 2,161 10,944 17,544 23,839 50.339 90,239 195,066

FEDERAL TEA-21 FLEXIBLE FUNDING (OR EQUIVALENT) 8.054 8,054 8,054 8,054 8,054 8.054 48.324

TOTAL PROJECTED FUNDING AVAILABLE WITHOUT FINANCING 195.955 191,100 215,100 240,100 285,100 265,100 1,372.455

FINANCING/(PAYBACK) 481.312 15.432 (59.528) (73,898) (113.536) (127,581) 122,403

TOTAL PROJECTED AVAILABLE FUNDING WITH FINANCING 677.267 206.532 155,572 166.404 151.564 137,519 1,494.858

""UQ)

~y2001~Ip\l1lble2.t285y,bJCD

f\JWW

TABLE 3"1JQ)

FISCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM BUDGETCOCD Un I"ousand! of doCla,s.

NW~ FUNDINQ SOURCES

100,., LOCAL ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT

ALLOCATION FlEXIDLE REPAIRABLE NON·FEOERAl INCOMEI DEBT REPROGRAMMED

PROJECTS: CATEGORY SECTION 9 SECTION J FUNDS PAnTS FUNDING SUBTOTAL OTHER FINANCING FUNDING 11) TOTAL

RAfl CAR PROCUREMENT nAil CAT. 1 $0 $24,896 $24,898

RAil CAR REHAOIUTATION RAil CAT. 2 1,902 $1,902 $408.207 $410.109EMERGENCY RAil REHA81UTATION RAil CAT. 2 $10.556 $10.556 $10.556

STATION STRUCTURES &EaUfPMENT REHABILITATION RAil CAT. 2 $19.042 $43.877 $62.919 $62.919

RAil MAINTENANCE RAIL CAT. 2 $2.700 $2,100 $253 $2,953OTHER nAil PROJECTS RAil CAT. 2 $5.644 '10,038 $5.000 $2.162 $22,944 $14,682 $7.046 $44,571

BUS PURCHASES BUS MILES $1,190 $8,054 $9,244 $23,206 82.674 $35.123

ANNUAL BUS oveRHAUL DUSMILES $18,415 "8.416 $18.415SOUTtIEAST DUS GARAGE BUS MtlES $4,473 $4.473 '4,473OTHER BUS PROJECTS BUS MilES $25,085 $25.085 $25,095JOINT BUS & RAIL BUS MilES S1'.373 $11,373 $1.500 $10,069 $15.225 $38.167

(}\ TOTAL $98.478 $55,817 $8,054 '6,000 $2.162 $169.511 $1.500 $481.312 $24.944 $677,261

LOCAL MATCH:

FLEXIBLE FUNDING· BUS $1.611 1.611OTHER BUS ITEMS $12.107 $0 $0 12,107

aus REPAIRABLE PARTS 0RAIL CATEGOAY I $0 $0 $0 $0 0RAIL CATEGORY II $7,588 $11,163 $0 $2.162 20,914

RAil REPAIRABLE PARTS $5,000 5.0000

TOTAL lOCAL $19.696 $11,163 $1.611 $6.000 $2,162 $39,632

TABLE 4

FISCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM BUDGET

STATE AND LOCAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS

PRINCEDISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLSCOLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL

FLEXIBLE FUNDING MATCH:

BUS PROJECTS

FEDERAL $2,356,455 $1,018,322 $1,402,364 $335,150 $450,552 $0 $859,109 $21,248 $6.443,200LOCAL $589.114 $254,580 $350,591 $83,788 $112..638 $0 $214.771 $5.312 $1.610..800

TOTAl FLEXIBLE FUNDING $2.945.569 $1,212.902 $1.752.954 $418,938 $563,190 $0 $1,073,886 $26,560 $8.054,000

SECTION 9 MATCH:

BUS PROJECTS $4.427,936 $1.913,494 $2,635,134 $629,169 $846,617 $0 $1.614,323 $39,926 $12.107,200RAIL CATEGOnV 2 $2,784,184 $1.388,374 $1, 178,023 $341,397 $794.. 505 $22.917 $1,050,690 $22,310 $7.588,400

TOTAL SECTION 9 MATCH $7,212.120 $3,301,868 $3,813,157 $977.166 $1,641,123 $22.917 $2,665.013 $62.236 $19,695.600

SECTION 3 MATCH:'-J BUS PROJECTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

RAIL CATEGOAY 2 $4.095,851 $2,042,456 $1,733.006 $511,060 $1.168,808 $33.713 $1,545,684 $32,820 $11,163,400TOTAL SECTION 3 MATCH $4.095.851 $2,042,456 $1,733.006 $511.060 $1,168,808 $33..713 $1,545,684 $32,820 $11,163..400

ADDITIONAL NON·FEDERAL:

BUS PROJECTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0RAIL CATEGOnV 2 $793.238 $395.560 $335,629 $98,976 $226,361 $6.529 $299.351 $6,356 $2,162,000

TOTAL AOO'L. NON·FEDERAl $793.238 $395,560 $335,629 $98,976 $226,361 $6,529 $299,351 $6,356 $2,162,000

REPAIRABLE PARTS:

BUS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0RAIL $1.834,500 $914.800 $776.200 $228,900 $623,500 $15,100 $692,300 $14,700 $5,000.000

TOTAL REPAIRABLE PARTS $1.834,500 $914,800 $776,200 $228,900 $523,500 $15.100 $692,300 $14,700 $5,000,000

TOTAL LOCAL W/O FLEX. $13,935,709 $6.654.683 $6.657.992 $1,816,103 $3.559,792 $78,260 $5,202,348 $116,113 $38,021,000TOTAL lOCAL PLUS FLEX. $16.881.278 $7.927.586 $8,410,947 $2.235,041 $4,122,982 $78;260 $6,276,234 $142;673 $46..075,000

BUS CAPITAL ONE-TENTH

"'U ADJUSTMENT ($67,8881 $ 1.991 $81,617 .•..•..••-------•..•.•••••.-- NVTC c $15,720 •••••.••••••.•..•••.•--------.••• $0Q)

COCD

Ntv01

N.V=Y200I\CIIJ'2DO.CIPr.\VU2 05118100 7;53:27 AM


SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF METRORAIL OPERATING HOURS

#2000-39RESOLUTION



WHEREAS, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority is committed toenhancing service for its riders in a cost-effective manner; and

WHEREAS, it would be beneficial for our riders and the regional economy forWMATA to extend the hours of Metrorail operations; and

WHEREAS, safety and service reliability remain the top priorities for Metrorailoperations; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors adopted a Transit Service Expansion,Plan onMarch 25, 1999, that calls for WMATA to "improve access to and capacity of the MetroSystem", and the extension of hours of Metro operations, which is supported by segmentsof the community and may have economic development benefits, is consistent with thegoals of the Board's service expansion policy; and

WHEREAS, on November 5, 1999, Metrorail extended its hours of revenueoperations and the hours of associated Metrobus service from midnight to 1:00 AM onFriday and Saturday nights for an eight-month demonstration period through June 30,2000;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the demonstration to extendoperations hours to 1:00 AM on Friday and Saturday is hereby made a permanent additionto Metrorail and associated Metrobus operating hours;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Metrorail shall extend its hours of revenueoperations and the hours of associated Metrobus service from 1:00 AM to 2:00 AM onFriday and Saturday nights for a demonstration period beginning July 1,2000 throughJune 30. 2001;

Page 236

SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF METRORAIL OPERATING HOURSPage 2

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEDthatthe General Managershall issue a memorandumto the Board of Directors that WMATA has the resources, including staffing and equipment,to implement the extension to 2:00 a.m. and that there are no operational, reliability,maintenance, or safety impediments to implementation;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager shall provide to the BoardBudget Committee by April, 2001 a report on the extension of Metrorail hours of operationfrom 1:00 AM to 2:00 AM covering the time period through March, 2001, and the Board atthat time shall consider that analysis, which minimally will include the following:

• Actual revenues compared to projections,• Actual expenses compared to projections,• Actual ridership compared to projections,• An assessment of crime to persons and property,• An assessment of impact on maintenance, and• An assessment of the impact on service reliability;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, absent subsequent Board action or specificbudget authorization, this extension of the hours of Metrorail operation will terminate onJune 30,2001;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager shall clearly identify in theproposed Fiscal Year 2002 budget the expected revenue, expenses and jurisdictionalsubsidies required for the extension of operating hours proposal until 2:00 AM so that theBoard may examine and considerthis item in conjunction.with other service enhancementsduring its budget deliberations;

BE lT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effectiveimmediately.


~\EXPANPLN/I:tESOI.UTION·200AMwPCl

Motion by Mr. Graham. seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barnett and Mrs. Hanley

Page 237


SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FISCAL2001 OPERATING BUDGET

. #2000-40RESOLUTION


OFTHEWASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received the comments of the local jurisdictionson the Proposed Fiscal 2001 Operating Budget; and

WHEREAS, the comments received support adoption of the Fiscal 2001 OperatingBUdget as distributed to the local jurisdictions.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors approves the Fiscal2001 Operating Budget providing for revenues of $389,638,372 , operating expenses of$728,484,595 , and a gross subsidy requirement of $338,846,223 and 9,419 positions.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fiscal 2001 debt service requirement is$27,484,194

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fiscal 1999 audit adjustment is $20,515,500

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the jurisdictional shares of the Fiscal 2001 grosssubsidy and debt service requirement are as follows:

District of Columbia $144,619,983Montgomery County $64,604,817Prince George's County $63,256,297City of Alexandria $16,531,129Arlington County $27,399,589Fairfax City $677,989Fairfax County $48,179,867City of Falls Church...................... $1,060,746Total $366,330,417


Cheryl C(~urkeGeneral eounsel

Motion by Mr. Barnett, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 6 • Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barnett, and Mrs. HanleyPage 238

"Q)COCD

NWto

41, , ~

Fiscal 2001 Operating Budget""U $ in T/JoUSBndsQ)

coentv

District of~ Montgo.nery Pro George's City of Arlington Fairfax Fairfax Falls0 Total Columbia County County Alexandria County City County Church

Base BUdget $336,251.0 $133,235.5 $59,399.8 $57.725.4 $14,759.6 $25,036.0 $641.6 $44,423.5 $1,029.6

Paratransit Services for Fairfax &Prince George's Counties $418.2 ($6.7) ($10.9) $42.2 ($4.2) ($1.5) ($1.3) $400.9 ($0.3)

Revenue Adjustment ($11.100.0) ($4,303.6) ($1,898.3) ($1,758.0) ($511 ..4) ($1,061.1) ($27.8) ($1,504.4) ($35.3)

Continuation of Metrorail 1:00 am Close $2,100.0 $796.0 $367.0 $364.0 $93.0 $189.0 $5.0 $280.0 $6.0

Extension of Late Closing to 2:00 am $1.500.0 $576.0 $260.0 $260.0 $67.0 $131.0 $3.0 $198.0 $5.0

New Regional Bus Service $2,787.0 $1,031.0 $445.0 $445.0 $558.0 $133.0 $3.0 $168.0 $4.0

Jan 13 Opening of Branch Ave Line $1,359.0 $364.0 $133.0 $652.0 $30.0 $53.0 $3.0 $121.0 $3.0

Branch Avenue Bus Service Plan $393.0 $568.0 ($99.0) $80.0 ($25.0) ($57.0) $0.0 ($74.0) $0.0

SmartMover $1,522.0 $43.0 $786.0 $19.0 $0.0 ($3.0) $2.0 $675.0 $0.0

Enhanced Marketing $500.0 $205.0 $77.0 $85.0 $23.0 $40.0 $1.0 $67.0 $2.0

Washington Navy Yard Shuttle $163.0 $127.0 ($14.0) $0.0 $18.0 $38.0 $0.0 ($6.0) $0.0

Union station to Dulles $750.0 $750.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0

Branch Avenue to King Street $473.0 $150.0 $46.0 $190.0 $17.0 $26.0 $0.0 $43.0 $1.0

Accelerated Recruitment and Training $500.0 $203.0 $80.0 $79.0 $24.0 $45.0 $1.0 $66.0 $2.0

Diesel Fuel $950.0 $413.8 $130.4 $171.7 $45.1 $80.2 $0.7 $124.9 $3.2

Workers' Compensation ($260.0) ($101.9) ($40.2) ($55.8) ($9.5) ($13.0) ($0.4) ($38.8) ($0.4)

Additional Strategic Buses $540.0 $238.6 $75.5 $84.0 $28.4 $43.9 $0.5 $66.8 $2.3

Debt Service $27,484.2 $10,331.3 $4,867.5 $4.872.9 $1,418.2 $2,740.2 $46.7 $3,188.9 $38.5

VA Total =$93,849.3

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: June 8, 2000

SUBJECT: POLICY FOR TRAVEL TO APTA, COMTO & UITP FUNCTIONS

#2000-41RESOLUTION



WHEREAS, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution #98-28 on June 25, 1998,establishing policy on staff participation in activities sponsored by the American PublicTransportation Association (APTA)1 the Conference of Minority Transportation Officials(COMTO), and the International Union of Public Transport (UITP); and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors recognizes the benefit to the Authority fromBoard and staff participation in activities sponsored by APTA, COMTO, and UITP; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors believes that WMATA benefits from staffparticipation in APTA activities by keeping abreast of the best practices in the transitindustry; by receiving professional training and development; by participating in theexchange of ideas, experiences and regulatory/legislative/product improvement updates;and by being represented in functional areas where many transit industry decisions arebeing made; and

WHEREAS. the Board of Directors recognizes the importance of being costconscious in funding travel expenses for staff participation in conferences;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors authorizes theGeneral Manager to designate staff participation at APTA and COMTO conferences,seminars and workshops;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager may attend any APTA,U1TP or COMTO events as necessary;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is directed to providequarterly reports to the Board on staff participation at these functions, to include whotraveled, where the function was held, and the purpose of the participation;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that one member of the Board of Directors mayrepresent the Authority at UITP functions;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that attendance by the Board of Directors and seniorstaff at the APTA Legislative Conference shall be in accordance with the flat feenegotiated between the Authority and APTA;

Page 241

SUBJECT: Policy for Travel to APTA, COMTO & UITP Functions Page 2

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary shall coordinate Board memberattendance at APTA and COMTO functions;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that at its discretion and subject to availability offunding, the Board of Directors may approve attendance by any member of the Board orstaff at any function not specifically authorized above;

BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall be effectively immediatelyand shall supercede Resolution #98-28.


Motion by Mr. Barnett, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barnett. and Mrs. Hanley

Page 242

. PRESENTED & ADOPTED: June B1 2000

SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CHANGES TO THE·PROCUREMENT POLICY STATEMENT

#2000-42RESOLUTION


OFTHEWASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors approved specific procurement thresholdson July 24, 1997, and approved the Procurement Policy Statement by Resolution No.97-31; and

WHEREAS, the dynamic nature of Authority procurements require changing thethresholds for designated procurement actions and to elaborate on the emergencyauthority delegated to the General Manager.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following changes to theProcurement Policy Statement are hereby approved:

• the Board contract approval thresholds for Professional and Technical(P&T) actions is consistent regardless of fund source;

• the Board approval threshold for modification of equipment, supplies,services, construction and real estate contracts not funded from P&Tfunds is changed from $200,000 to: A) for Board approved contracts,10% of the original approved contract value or $200,000, whichever islower; and B) for non-Board approved contracts when the cumulativevalue of the original contract and all modifications will exceed $100,000;and

• the Board guidelines for reporting emergency procurements is changedfrom periodically to within 60 days of the action.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEO that this Resolution shalf be effectiveimmediately.

Reviewed as form and legal sufficiency.

Motion by Mr. Barnett, seconded by Mr. Zimmennan, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barnett and Mrs. Hanley

Page 243

· "

XV. Contract ~.!\pprovalRequirements -The Board has delegated approval authority to theGeneral Manager for cenain activities identified below. The General Manager is authorizedto delegate the approval of procurement initiation and award activities that the B~ard hasdelegated to the General Manager to subordinate officials of the A.uthority. The GeneralManager will establish procedures which will provide for timely revie\v and processing ofall procurement actions. Board approval is required for the follo\ving:

Page 244

ACTIVITY REQUIRING BOARD APPROV.A.LE. Initiation of Procurement:

1. All procurement actions except as li~ed

below.

2. Real Estate Acquisitions

3. Professional and Technical Services (P&T)

a. Operating

b. Capital

F. Contract Awards:

1. All awards, except as listed below.

., Real Estate Acquisitions

3. .-:\ny award which would represent achange to Board policy.

4. Professional and Technical SeiVices (P&T)

a. Operating

b. Capital

DOLLAR THRESHOLD

Over 5100,000

Board Approval NotRequired

Over S50,OOO IfBudgetedOver 510,000 If NonBudgeted

Over 550,000 IfBudgetedOver S10.000 If NonBudgeted

Over S100.000

Over S150~OOO

o ve r S 5 0 . 0 a0 IiBudgetedOver 510,000 If NonBudgeted

Over 550,000 IfBudgetedOver S10,000 If NonBudgeted

Revised 5/01/00.

· ".

G. Modifications:

1. All modifications for equipment, supplies,services, construction and real estateincluding exercise of options, ex.cept asnoted below.

1. Any modification exceeding the authorizedbudget including contingency, if any.

3. Any budgeted modification to exercise acontract option when the option was evaluatedas part of the basis of award and Board approvalwas provided as part of the initial award.

4. Piofessional and Technical Sen;ces (P&T)

a. Operating

b. Capital

A.

B.

For Board Annr'ovedContracts:10% of the originalapproved contractvalue or 5-200,000!whichever is lower.For Non-BoardAnoroved Contracts:The cumulativevalue oithe originalcontract and allmodifications exceeds

SIOOtOOO

Over Budget

Board Appro\'alNot Required.

Over S I0.000: Boardapproval required ifmodification is greaterthan S10.000 more thanfunds prevlouslyapproved on StaffSummary Sheet.

Over S10,000; Boardapproval required ifmodification is greaterthan 510,000 more thanfunds previouslyapproved on StaffSummary Sheet.

NOTE 1: Notwithstanding the above, the Generaliv!anager has the authority to incurobligations in emergency situations, and \vill report back to the Board on allemergency procurements within 60 days ofthe action. Emergency is definedas a situation (such as a flood, epidemic) riot, equipment failure, or otherreason declared by the General Manager) \vhich creates an immediate threat10 the public health, welfare or safety. The existence of an emergencycondition creates an innnediate need for supplies, services or construction\vhich cannot be met throu~h Donnal procurement methods, and the lack ofwhich "would seriously threaten either the health or safety ofany person, the

Revised 5/QlIOO _

Page 245

·..'.

Page 246

NOTE 2:

preservation or protection of property, or the continuation of necessaryAuthority functions.

Professional and Technical (P&T) services includes but is not limited to laborand services provided by attorneys, accountants, appraisers, arbiters, auditors,investment bankers, computer service companies, architect/engineering firms,management consultants, and transit industry consultants. ...

Revised 5101/00

B(lARD ''It()ClJl~EI\'II(NTACTION I"IATI~IX

Revised 5/01/00

ACTIVITY IU~QUIIUNG BOAIUl D()LLAR TIIIU~SIl()I.I) - CURRI~NT DOLLAR TIIRI~S"'OLD - 1)I~OI)OSI~D IIYAI'PROVAL TIIEGMGR

A. Initiation of Procurement

I. AII procurement actions except as Over $100)000 No ChangeIisted below.

2. Real Estate Acquisitions Board Approval not Required No Change

3. Professional and TechnicalServices (P&T)

a. Operating Over $50,000 if Budgeted No ChangeOver $10,000 if Non-13udgcted

b. Capital Over $100,000 Over $50)000 if BuugetcdOver $10)000 if Non-Budgeted

"lJQ)(0(1)

I\.)

~-..J

·gACTIVITY 1~I~QlJlIUNGBOARD J)OLLAI~ TIII~ESIIOLJ) - CUI~IU~NT DOLLAI~ T"'I~ESHOLD - JlI~OI)OSED BY~fJl)ROVAIJ THE GI\'IGI{

~. Contract Awards:

I. All awards except as listed below Over $100,000 No Change

2. Real Estate Acquisitions Over $250,000 No Change

3. Any award which would Requires Board Approval No changerepresent a change to Boardpolicy e.g. Indemnification

4. Professional and TechnicalServices (P&T)

a. Operating Over $50,000 irBudgeted No ChangeOver $10,000 i rNon-Budgeted

Over $50,000 if Budgetedb. Capital Over $100,000 Over $1 o,ono if Non-budgeted

ACTIVITV H.lc:QlJlIUNG nOAIU) I)()LLAR TllnESII()I.ll - CLJIUU~NT D()LI-AI{ TIIRI~SIlOLD- PROI)OSI~J) BYAI)I)({()VAI. TilE GMGR

C. Modifications

I. All modi fications for equipmcllt Over $200,000 A. For Board Approved Contracts:supplies, services, construction Hnd 10%. of thc original approvcd contractrClIl estate including exercise of vulue or $200,000, whichever is lower.options, except us noted below B. For Non-Board Approved Contracts:

The cumulative value of the original contractand nil modifielltions excceds $100,000.

2. Any modification exceeding the Ovcr Budget No Changeauthorized budget includingcontingency, if any.

3. Any budgeted modi fication tn Board Approval not Required No ('hangeexercise a contract option whcn theoption was evaluated as part of thehasis of aWilrd and Board approvalwas provided as part of thc initialaward.

4. Professional and Technical Services

a. Operating Over $10,000; Board approval required ir No ChangeModi fication is greater than $1 n,OO() more thanfunds previously approved on StalT Summary Shect

b. CapitClI Over $200,000 Over $10,000; Board approval required i r:P

Modification is grcaler lh:m $10,"00 more than

(~ funds previously approvcd on Sta IT Summary Shcet..U

~CD

"Uw$.lo(e:I'VCJ1o

Thc (jencral Manager hns the ilUlhority to incur obligations in emcrgency situations, and will report back to the Board on all emergency procurements within60 days. Emergency is defined as n situation (such as a flood. cpidcmic, riot, equipmcnt f~lilure, or other reason dechlred by the General Manager) whichcreatcs an illll1lcdiutc threat to the public hecllth, welfare. or safety. The existence uran cmcrgency conc.Jition creates an immediate need It)r supplies. servicesor construction which cannot be met through normal procurement mcthods, iIIul the lack of which would seriously threaten either the health or safety of anypersont the preservation or protection of property, or the continuation of necessary Authority functions.

(

(

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JUNE 22, 2000SUBJECT: REVISED IRP REPROGRAMMING POLICY

-12000-43RESOLUTION



WHEREAS, beginning in fiscal 2000, the Board of Directors has determined that a quarterlyreport on the status of the Infrastructure Renewal Program will be presented to the Board BudgetCommittee; and

WHEREAS the Infrastructure Renewal Program includes Internally Generated Funds as a fundingsource for projects; and

WHEREAS from time to time adjustments may be required to approved Infrastructure RenewalProgram budgets and project funding levels; and

WHEREAS the Board Budget Comminee has directed the General Manager to establish a budgetamendment and reprogramming policy for the Infrastructure Renewal Program.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEO that the following actions affecting the InfrastructureRenewal Program budget shall require approval of the Board Budget Committee prior to submission tothe Board of Directors:

• initiation of any new project; or

• amendment of any fiscal year's total budget in the approved six-year program; or

• any increase in IRP staffing; or

• any reprogramming actions over $200,000 on an annual cumulative basis between IRPprojects in the current year's budget; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that when the General Manager submits an annual proposed IRPbudget, the total amount of IRP Internally Generated Funds available shall be identified, the proposeduse of all or part of these funds in the proposed IRP shall be provided, and any use of IRP InternallyGenerated Funds other than as included in an approved IRP budget shall require approval by the BoardBudget Committee prior to submission to the Board of Directors; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any reprogramming actions below the $200,000 threshold willbe identified and included in the quarterly report to the Board Budget Committee; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is authorized to approve reprogrammingactions exceeding the $200,000 limit on an emergency basis, as defined in the WMATA ProcurementRegulations, provided that the Board Budget Committee be immediately notified of such actions; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEO that this Resolution supercedes Resolution #99-64 adopted onOctober 28, 1999 and shall be effective immediately.


~d~;-General Counsel

Motion by Mr. Zimmerman, seconded by Mr. Graham, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Hanley, and Mr. ~~~s251


SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FISCAL 2001103·MILE RAIL CAPITAL PROGRAM BUDGET

#2000-44RESOLUTION



WHEREAS, the Fifth Interim Capital Contributions Agreement (ICCA-V), executed onJanuary 29,1992, provides for the completion of the folloWing Metrorail segments:

a. Blue Line from Van Darn to Franconia-Springfieldb. Red Line from Wheaton to Glenmontc. Green Line from U Street-Cardozo to Fort Tottend. Green Line from Anacostia to Branch Avenue; and

WHEREAS, the WMATA Rail Capital Program Committee has reviewed the proposedFiscal 2001 Budget, as attached hereto, and recommends Board approval; and

WHEREAS, on January 27,2000 WMATA submitted the Proposed Rail CapitalProgram Budget to the Political Subdivisions/Guarantors; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received and considered comments from thelocal jurisdictions on the Proposed Fiscal 2001 103-Mile Rail Capital Program Budget; and

WHEREAS, completion of the 103-mile system requires a Fiscal 2001 Budget(obligation plan) totaling $80,04Q,000 and a cumulative monthly ceiling for local jurisdictionalcash payments totaling $79,969,500 consistent with Local Funding Agreements signed byeach participating jurisdiction; and

WHEREAS, a total of $383,900,000 has been identified for transfer to construction ofthe Branch Avenue Yard and rail car procurement ($1 04,000,000 from the 89.5-Mile SystemBudget, $29,500,000 from the insurance buy-out and $250,400,000 from the 103-MileSystem Budget); and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors, in accordancewith ICCA-V, approves the Authority's proposed Fiscal 2001 Rail Capital Program Budget.


Cheryl C. u'rkeGeneral C unsel

Motion by Mr. Graham, seconded by Mr. Trotter, and unanimously approved.A~§ 2~2i' Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Hanley, and Mr. Sickles

I ~ ~ I I • if. ••• ,t' \.

.1 ... .. .. ... ..... .. . ... ... ... . .... .. .. ... . ... . . _...

./ . .' . .

103-MILE SYSTEM COMPLETION

Fiscal 2001

Segment Obligation Schedule Expenditure Schedule.

JanuarY June January JuneMailout Current Mailout Current

J/H Route $ 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 0.008 Route $ 0.0 $ 0.3 $ 0.2 $ 0.3ME Route $ 5.1 $ 5.1 $ 46.0 $ 14.5OF Route* $60.5 $67.7 $112.9 $115.8Rail Cars S 6.9 $ 6.9 ~ 94.2 $ 96.6

"U TOTAL $72.6 $80.0 $253.4 $227.2Q)

coCD

tv($ in Millions)01

w*Includes Branch Avenue Yard ..

103-MILE SYSTEMBRANCH AVENUE YARD & RAIL CARS REQUIREMENTS & FUNDING

As of June 15, 2000 ($ in millions)

Rgguirements

Branch Avenue Yard

192 Rail Cars

Current Funding

103-Mile System

> JH Route

> B Route

> F Route

89.5 Mile System

Insurance Buy-Out

Tax Advantage Leases - Closed Transactions

Rail Car Insurance Payment

.Subtotal (Completes Ya"rd & Buys 150 Rail Cars)

Remaining Funds Needed:

Probable Source:

> CIP Funds

Total Funding: 'Completes Yard & Buys 192. Rail'Cars

$112.0

$378.1

$69.1

$42.4

$138.9

$104.0

$29.5

$81.0

$1.2

$24.0

$490.1

$466.1

.$24.0

$490.1

, I

J

.: 'r·:··':"·~:·:_-·~:"· ~: ..~":K': . ~::.: .:-.:.~::.~:: .. :::. "::.. ~':.": .; - ~ :.':.:'-:~.:. :'.. "> :: : ••• ' .: , ••••••• '.-' ••• , :~'." ::.:'.. • " ••• , ••• '-.::

i,V ~ 't' i~~'::i'~;.1 ;i :(1 Ii I,'~"i I; ;', i;,'!1 ;,,.,, ~~.~ Ii,., '" \ ,'l;"j" l:]'a';'" I ;. -:, ;':.; ,i': ." 'o,;! '" ",. '. ' ! : "" ;, ,', ! < 'i:; '.t', :::. :- ,,' i; ;: " ,: I' \.. /:->..",::..~:' ,,; ","';'.' '''~' j',.' '-::,.. ' " , .'.. \.~:-,\,! : . ' ,:' , ::: I:'! ," :'.'" \ '~, " " .... ' ", '" '. :':- :;. ,,". ,. ,.,. ,", I .,.,.. " 'h : ..:

.. ... '

RAIL CAPITAL PROGRAM BUDGET -103 MILE SYSTEMCUMULATIVE MONTHLY CEILING FOR FISCAL 2001 CASH PAYMENTS

=~=·-::~~~~==--~--=:=:~~=~~=:.rD~~;;~;;;I~~~"~~~~;~~r~:::g:;s';~;;~~;·~:='·::·=--=~·~~;;;rljN-;:'~;;'.:~;~~~~~';;''wm;;'~-==~~: ..:-~:~---- -------------- ...-_.. -----"-CoWMBIA - ---coUNty ---- --COUNty-I---tOtAr-~LEXANDRIAI---couNrv,·-I-clt\r--1 cl1UNfV ICRuRcHI-rofAf -r-tOtAL "

FISCAL 2001 E:STIMATEOF BILLS:

------------

, -

'"Um(QCD

I\.>rn(11 Revised 4:00 p.m.

June 13. 2000

_______ ' .--L-


SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FISCAL 2001 SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT AND EXPANSIONPROGRAM BUDGET

#2000-45

RESOLUTIONOF THE

BOARD OF DIRECTORSOF THE


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received and considered comments fromthe local jurisdictions on the Proposed Fiscal 2001 System Improvement and ExpansionProgram; and

WHEREAS, public transit services in the Washington metropolitan area playa keyrole in providing mobility, reducing traffic congestion, lowering emissions and improving thequality of life and the economic vitality of the region; and

WHEREAS, the WMATA Board of Directors recognizes that transit services mustcontinue to be a major element of the region's transportation network and that the region'sbus and rail services must continue to expand as the region grows; and

WHEREAS, the WMATA Board of Directors adopted a Transit Service ExpansionPlan which defines proposed projects and programs to double transit ridership by 2025;and

WHEREAS, the System Improvement and Expansion Program is comprised of aProject Development Program, Improvement Projects 1 and Major Expansion Projects.Development of the System Improvement and Expansion Program was initiated at therequest of the WMATA Board of Directors to implement the Transit Service ExpansionPlan.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors approve theFiscal 2001 System Improvement and Expansion Program Budget totaling $ 229,909,000,

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall be effective immediately.

Motion by Mr. Graham, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Hanley, and Mr. Sickles

Page 256

(Dollars in Thousands)

FY 2001 - 2006 System Impru'Iement and Expansion ProgramCurrent Project - Obligation Projections

FY 2001 for Approval & FY 2002 - 2006 for Planning Purposes Only

Project Current FY 2000 & FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 2001 Thru~_~:.. 1... :_ Prior 2008

Project Development" 19,30C 2,000 2.30C 3.000 3.000 3,000 3,OOC 3.00e 17,30C

Largo Extension 4331B6~ 14 t 602 100,OO( 100 t OO( 105.011 100,OO( 14,24~ 0 419,26,

Duties PE/NEPA 40 t 550 550 40,OO( 0 0 0 0 0 40.00C

DC Convention Center 25,20(J 19,77A 3,20C 1,80(J 426 0 0 0 5,426

Vienna Parking Garage 25,10C 24,757 343 0 0 a a 0 343

New York Avenue Station 84.00C 3,800 IO,OOC 5,000 3.000 2.200 0 0 aO,200

Rosslyn Livable Communities 2,125 2.125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

King street SlaUon .13,10C 0 1,423 9,900 1,777 0 0 0 13,100

Ballston Station Improvements·· 8,700 0 a.70C 0 0 0 0 0 8.700

Clarendon Station Improvements·· 960 0 960 0 0 0 0 a 960

Rosslyn Station Improvements·· 120 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 120

Shirlington Bus Terminal·· 1.100 0 1.100 0 0 0 0 0 1,100

Pentagon Bus Terminal"· 200 0 200 a 0 0 0 0 200

Silver Spring Transit Center 8,972 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ITS Communications Enhancement 1.563 0 1,56~ 0 0 0 0 0 1,563

TOTALS 664 85~ 67.82A 229 90~ 11970( 113~2201 10520( 17246 3 000 588.27~

"Proposed FY 2001 Budget ··Needs further definition of scope and funding by jurisdictional slaffNote: Largo $ amounts represent the Maryland approved Budget including Maryland's estfmated Federal match

Allocation of FY '01 Protect Development Funds ($ In Millions)District of Columbia 37% $0.85Maryland 35% $0.81Virginia 280/0 $0.64

$2.30

FUNDED PROJECTS

to $2.3 million Project Development Program candidate projects to be reviewed and approved per adoptedpolicy:

District of Columbia

Project

to Georgetown Connection with optional routesto Downtown to Fort Lincoln via New York Avenue with

connection to future New York Avenue Stationto Georgia Avenue from Silver Spring to Howard

University with alternative routes south.. Woodley Park to Minnesota Avenue, SE via Adams Morgan,

U Street, Florida Avenue and Benning Road.. Georgetown or Foggy Bottom to Southwest Waterfront

via Kennedy Center and the Tidal Basin.. Southeast/Southwest Business Route to connect

M Street SW to Buzzard Point and back to M Street SE.. Congress Heights or Anacostia to National Harbor,

Prince George's County.. Cleveland Park or Woodley Park to Brookland via Medstar

Washington Hospital Center and the McMillan Sand Filtration Site

Transit ServiceExpansion

FY 2001 Budget Plan Element*

'** 4- 4

*'* 4

** 4

'*'* 4

*. 4

** 2

4

'** Project specific budget to be determinedTotal: $850,000·*

State of Maryland

.. Georgetown Branch Transitway $300,000 4

.. Beltway Transit Study $200,000 4

.. Woodrow Wilson Bridge $170,000 4

.. New Carrollton Parking Garage $ 90,000 11-270 Corridor Study $ 50.000 4

Total: $810,000

Commonwealth of Virginia

.. Rosslyn (2nd entrance) $ 40,000 3Crystal City (2nd entrance) $ 60,000 3Columbia Pike - LRT $ 60,000 4

.. Parking Franconia/Springfield (Conceptual) $140,000 1

.. West Falls Church/Dunn Loring (2nd Parking Lot) (Conceptual) $ 90.000 1East Falls Church (2nd Parking Lot) (Conceptual) $ 90,000 1Woodrow Wilson Bridge $100,000 4VA Beltway/Highway NEPA Process Review $ 40,000 4

.. VDOT Route 1 Center Line StUdy $ 20.000 2Total: $640,000

Notes: * Element 1: Improve access to and capacity of Metrorail.Element 2: Improve bus service levels and expand to new service areas.Element 3: Selectively add stations, entrances and station capacity to the existing system.Element 4: Expand fixed guideway services.

··District of Columbia has an additional S740K in unallocated carryover from FY 2000.Recommend that all unobligated FY 2000 Project Development funds carryover to FY 2001.

T\ROO\F'19aOgR~E25"S

{

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JULY 27, 2000

SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO CARRYOVER FISCAL2000 IRP FUNDS INTO FISCAL 2001

#2000-47

RESOLUTIONOF THE

BOARD OF DIRECTORSOF THE


WHEREAS, the Board Budget Committee has reviewed the Fiscal 2000Preliminary Fourth Quarter Infrastructure Renewal Program Status Report and hasdetermined that funds for certain criticaJ projects which have not been encumbered inFiscal 2000 should be carried over into Fiscal 2001 for implementation; and

WHEREAS, the Infrastructure Renewal Program provides for the rehabilitationand replacement of existing assets, and the completion of these projects is necessaryto maintain system reliability.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors approves thecarryover of' funding in the amount of approximately $7.1 million for the following fiveprojects from Fiscal 2000 to Fiscal 2001 for encumbrance and implementation:

o ERRP projects estimated at $3.6 million,o IAWP projects estimated at $2.5 million,o Silver Spring Call Center project estimated at $0.3 million, ando Station Signage project estimated at $0.7 million; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the funding for these projects shall beencumbered by December 31, 2000 unless otherwise directed by the Board ofDirectors; and


ad as to form and legal sufficiency.o

Motion by Mr. Barnett, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barnett and Mr. Kauffman

Page 259

Page 260

The reNEWed WMATA

We will aggressively transform WMATA

into

an entrepreneurial, customer and business focused, empowered team

Documents

FY2001 Approved Budget (263 Pages)