ORDER FUND FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 TOTAL Brook Road Bridge Design
and Construction 1 2,275,000.00$ 2,275,000.00$ Traffic Sign and
Signal Asset Management 2 150,000.00$ 150,000.00$ Manomet Avenue
Wicking Wells 3 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ Bartlett Road Bridge Design
and Construction 4 2,000,000.00$ 2,000,000.00$ Traffic Signal -
Court Street @ Cherry Street 5 2,000,000.00$ 2,000,000.00$ ADA
Compliance (Phase 2) 6 125,000.00$ 125,000.00$ Town Wide Sidewalks
7 1,000,000.00$ 1,000,000.00$ Roadway Asset Management Program 8
175,000.00$ 175,000.00$ EPA Stormwater MS4 Permit Compliance 9
250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ Relocating Long Pond Road 10 500,000.00$
2,000,000.00$ 2,500,000.00$ 5,000,000.00$
2,875,000.00$ 4,125,000.00$ 1,925,000.00$ 2,000,000.00$
2,500,000.00$ 13,425,000.00$
Person Submitting: Sheila Sgarzi
FISCAL YEAR 2022 - 2026
Department: DPW, Engineering Division
11/19/2020 Page 1 FY22 5-yr Plan - Engineering 11-19-2020
TOWN OF PLYMOUTH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN REQUEST FORM FY22 ANNUAL
TOWN MEETING REQUEST FORM
Department: DPW, Engineering Division Priority #: 1
Project Title and Description: Brook Road Bridge Design &
Construction Total
Project Cost: $2,275,000 Department/Division Head: Check if project
is: New Resubmitted Cost estimate was developed: Internally
Externally For project re-submittals, list prior year(s): List any
funding sources and amounts already granted: $511,454.60 in
grants
Basis of Estimated Costs (attach additional information if
available)
If project has impact on 5 Year Plan and future operating budgets,
insert estimated amounts.
Capital: Cost Comments Fiscal Year: Capital
Operations & Maintenance
FY22
FY23
FY24
Total Capital $1,765,000.00 Rounded up from $1,763,545.40
Project Justification and Objective: The proposed Brook Road Bridge
project will replace the existing one-lane bridge with a 30’-6”
wide
steel and concrete structure, two 11’ wide travel lanes, a 5’-6”
wide sidewalk and a new 8” ductile iron water main. The Brook Road
Bridge
dates back to the 19th century. Improvements were made to the
bridge in 1926 when the wooden floor was replaced with steel I
beams. Bridge
inspection reports over the past ten years have rated the deck and
superstructure in the range of fair to satisfactory condition and
the
substructure in the range of poor to satisfactory condition. The
posted weight limit precludes school buses, fire engines and
garbage trucks
from crossing the bridge. The 1937 cast iron water main that
crosses the bridge is hydraulically restricted due to tuberculation
and is in need
of replacement. The roadway approaches are constructed within the
floodway of Beaver Dam Brook; this alignment exacerbates the
potential
for upstream flooding. The proposed bridge replacement project will
address the current deficiencies and will enable two-way traffic to
safely
cross the bridge. For Capital Project Requests: Will this project
be phased over more than one fiscal year? If yes, enter it on the 5
Year Plan Yes No Can this project be phased over more than one
fiscal year? Yes No For Capital Equipment Requests:
Check if equipment requested is replacement and enter the year,
make & model, VIN and present condition of existing equipment
What is the expected lifespan of this new/replacement equipment:
> 75 years, MassDOT standard Attach backup information,
estimates, or justification to support this request.
Sheila Sgarzi, Town Engineer
Item Cost Estimate Use Cost Estimate Basis
Design & Permitting 124,900.00$ 124,900.00$ Existing contract
with Bayside Engineering
Land Acquisition 40,000.00$ 40,000.00$ Estimated 28,191 SF of
proposed permanent easements
Construction 1,485,809.44$ 1,485,100.00$ Bayside Engineering
10/15/2020 cost estimate.
Construction Contingency (20%) 297,161.89$ 300,000.00$ Standard
practice is to use a 20 - 25% contingency
Temporary and Permanent Utility Pole Relocation 50,000.00$
50,000.00$ Bayside Engineering 10/28/2020 estimate
Police Details 132,000.00$ 135,000.00$ 150 days x 2 details x
$55/hour x 8 hr/day
Construction Administration & Inspection 140,000.00$
140,000.00$ Bayside Engineering 10/28/2020 estimate
TOTAL: 2,269,871.33$ 2,275,000.00$
ITEM NO. UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANT. UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED
COST
*115.1 LS DEMOLITION OF BRIDGE NO. P-13-011 1 $26,000.00
$26,000.00
120.1 CY UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 640 $40.00 $25,600.00
140. CY BRIDGE EXCAVATION 730 $50.00 $36,500.00
141. CY CLASS A TRENCH EXCAVATION 475 $40.00 $19,000.00
143. CY CHANNEL EXCAVATION 95 $165.00 $15,675.00
144. CY CLASS B ROCK EXCAVATION 48 $150.00 $7,125.00
151.01 CY GRAVEL BORROW - TYPE C 505 $55.00 $27,775.00
151.2 CY GRAVEL BORROW FOR BACKFILLING STRUCTURES AND PIPES 420
$50.00 $21,000.00
156. TON CRUSHED STONE 310 $50.00 $15,500.00
156.1 TON CRUSHED STONE FOR BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS 35 $50.00
$1,750.00
170. SY FINE GRADING AND COMPACTING 1,240 $5.00 $6,200.00
450.22 TON SUPERPAVE SURFACE COURSE – 9.5 (SSC – 9.5) 105 $150.00
$15,750.00
450.31 TON SUPERPAVE INTERMEDIATE COURSE – 12.5 (SIC – 12.5) 125
$125.00 $15,625.00
450.42 TON SUPERPAVE BASE COURSE – 37.5 (SBC – 37.5) 230 $110.00
$25,300.00
450.6 TON SUPERPAVE BRIDGE SURFACE COURSE - 9.5 (SSC-B-9.5) 6
$500.00 $3,000.00
450.71 TON SUPERPAVE BRIDGE PROTECTIVE COURSE - 12.5 (SPC-B-12.5)
15 $410.00 $6,150.00
452. GAL ASPHALT EMULSION FORO TACK COAT 130 $8.50 $1,105.00
*482.2 FT HOT POURED JOINT SEALER 530 $3.00 $1,590.00
482.3 FT SAWCUTTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT 50 $35.00 $1,750.00
627.1 EA TRAILING ANCHORAGE 2 $1,825.00 $3,650.00
627.82 EA GUARDRAIL TANGENT END TREATMENT, TL-2 2 $4,100.00
$8,200.00
*698.4 SY GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FORPERMANENT EROSION CONTROL 75 $6.00
$450.00
701. SY CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 177 $65.00 $11,519.44
751. CY LOAM BORROW 40 $60.00 $2,400.00
*754. CY WETLAND SOIL REHANDLED AND SPREAD 40 $100.00
$4,000.00
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Contract No. __________
ITEM NO. UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANT. UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED
COST
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
*767.121 FT SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER 400 $10.00 $4,000.00
904.3 CY 5000 PSI, 3/4 INCH, 685 HP CEMENT CONCRETE 40 $1,880.00
$75,200.00
942.102 FT STEEL PILE HP 10 X 57 1,200 $190.00 $228,000.00
948.41 EA DYNAMIC LOAD TEST BY CONTRACTOR 2 $7,250.00
$14,500.00
948.5 EA PILE SHOES 12 $200.00 $2,400.00
983.1 TON RIPRAP 125 $60.00 $7,500.00
*991.1 LS CONTROL OF WATER-STRUCTURE NO. P-13-011 1 $40,000.00
$40,000.00
995.01 LS BRIDGE STRUCTURE, BRIDGE NO. P-13-011 1 $760,000.00
$760,000.00
*996.3 SF PREFABRICATED ENGINEERED WALL SYSTEM 442 $35.00
$15,470.00
*999.99 LS WATER LINE PROTECTION/RELOCATION 1 $35,000.00
$35,000.00
SUBTOTAL $1,485,809.44
2 of 2 Brook Road Const Estimate.xlsm
From: Daniel Flagg To: Sheila Sgarzi Cc: Brian A. Boucher; Norman
H. Brown Subject: RE: Brook Road Bridge - Capital Request Date:
Wednesday, October 28, 2020 10:22:50 AM Attachments:
image001.png
Hi Sheila, After discussion with Brian we came up with the
following:
- We assumed that the construction work on the project would be
restricted to 7 AM to 5 PM Monday – Friday.
- Based on that restriction we are assuming a conservative estimate
of a 7 month construction season (the construction may be completed
sooner)
- The cost for that results as follows: Full-time Resident Services
- 150 Construction days @ 8 hours per day X $100/Hour = $120,000
Shop Drawing Review (Senior Engineer) – 160 Hours @ $125/hour = $
20,000 Total Construction Services = $140,000 Bayside in the
past has also completed Part-time Resident services with an average
of 4 hours per day (noting that some days during the construction
that no work is completed), that would result in the
following:
Part-time Resident Services - 150 Construction days @ 4 hours per
day X $100/Hour = $ 60,000 Shop Drawing Review (Senior Engineer) –
160 Hours @ $125/hour = $ 20,000 Total Construction Services
= $ 80,000 Finally our most recent bridge
completed in Boxford with some on-site services was done with the
assistance of the Boxford DPW Director and was completed with a
construction budget of $60,000. In the end, if you’re are looking
for the conservative number to use for the warrant - I would
recommend - $140,000. Let me know if you need anything else on this
issue, I would be glad to further discuss it with you. Thanks
Daniel J. Flagg
ssgarzi
Rectangle
D F
from an application that is not licensed to print to novaP
D F
The proposed Brook Road Bridge will be this style. Note: The
railings on the new Brook Road Bridge will be black.
Y ou created this P
D F
from an application that is not licensed to print to novaP
D F
ssgarzi
Callout
Brook Road Bridge will have a 5'-6" wide sidewalk on the north
side
ssgarzi
The proposed Brook Road Bridge will match this style bridge
Bridge P-13-011 (9KM) Project Overview Bridge P-13-011 (9KM) is a
single 11.5-foot span steel stringer/ reinforced concrete deck
bridge located in the Town of Plymouth that carries Brook Road over
the Beaver Dam Brook. The abutments and wingwalls are stone masonry
gravity walls. The bridge clear width is 16+/- feet and carries a
single lane of traffic. The bridge construction date is unknown,
however, based on similar construction methods, it is estimated
that the construction date is circa 1925. The bridge is currently
posted at H = 3 tons; Type 3 = 5 tons; 3S2 = 8 tons. An initial
routine bridge inspection was performed by Bayside Engineering on
August 8, 2016.
Key Issues During our site visit, bridge deficiencies were examined
and traffic operations were observed. Based on our inspection, the
bridge is generally in satisfactory condition. However, current
functionality of the structure are limited by the key issues
identified as: bridge capacity, bridge width and channel/floodway
constriction. The bridge posting precludes most commercial vehicles
from using the bridge to access the residencies on Brook Road and
Bulrush Lane. As such, access must be from the southerly Brook Road
intersection with route 3A (State Road). Despite this restriction,
Bayside observed a refuse truck, telecommunications vehicle and
package delivery truck crossing the bridge during our inspection.
The 16–foot clear width of the bridge and roadway approaches (45
feet in each direction) restricts roadway use to a single lane for
a total of 100 feet. Additionally, the roadway approaches are
constructed in the floodway of the Beaver Dam Brook. This has
resulted in significant upstream flooding under all flood profiles
analyzed in the Plymouth County Flood Study.
Environmental/Historic/Archaeologic Resources
Based on a review of online environmental, historic and
archeological resources within or adjacent to the bridge site, with
the exception of wetland, river and land under water resource
areas, there are no additional jurisdictional environmental,
historic or archeological resources of concern.
Proposed Bridge Replacement
Based on the site conditions, precast bridge units (box or deck
beams) using a full bridge closure and detour for construction
would most likely be the fastest and least expensive method of
bridge replacement design and construction.
Municipal Small Bridge Program Applicability
The P-23-011 bridge conditions have been reviewed for the
applicability standards for funding available under the MassDOT
Municipal Small Bridge Program. Because of the key issues outlined
above, the bridge is an excellent candidate for funding under this
program.
OVERHEAD SIGNS
SCOUR: Pleaseexplain
ITEM 61 (This Report)
Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural
components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting
structure stablility. Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective
action may put it back in light service.
Structural elements show some minor deterioration.
All primary structural elements are sound but may have minor
section loss, cracking, spalling or scour.
Advance section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
Loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously
affected primary structural components. Local failures are
possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may
be present.
Advance deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue
cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour
may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it
may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is
taken.
If YES please give priority:
HIGH ( ) MEDIUM ( ) LOW ( )
Date:
A. Bridge Railing
H 3 3S2 Single
At bridge Other Advance
ITEM 61 (Dive Report):
S= Severe/Major Deficiency- D
C-S= Critical Structural Deficiency -
Dive Cur DEF
(To be filled out by DBIE)
Deficiencies which are more extensive in nature and need more
planning and effort to repair. Examples include but are not limited
to: Moderate to major deterioration in concrete, Exposed and
corroded rebars, Considerable settlement, Considerable scouring or
undermining, Moderate to extensive corrosion to structural steel
with measurable loss of section, etc.
Deficiencies which are minor in nature, generally do not impact the
structural integrity of the bridge and could easily be repaired.
Examples include but are not limited to: Spalled concrete, Minor
pot holes, Minor corrosion of steel, Minor scouring, Clogged
drainage, etc.
A defect in a structure that requires corrective action.
[Shall be prioritized by District Maintenance Engineer or the
Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) and repairs made
when funds and/or manpower is available].
[Action/Repair should be initiated by District Maintenance Engineer
or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) upon receipt
of the Inspection Report].
A deficiency in a structural element of a bridge that poses an
extreme unsafe condition due to the failure or imminent failure of
the element which will affect the structural integrity of the
bridge.
C-H= Critical Hazard Deficiency - A deficiency in a component or
element of a bridge that poses an extreme hazard or unsafe
condition to the public, but does not impair the structural
integrity of the bridge. Examples include but are not limited to:
Loose concrete hanging down over traffic or pedestrians, A hole in
a sidewalk that may cause injuries to pedestrians, Missing section
of bridge railing, etc.
[Inspector(s) immediately contact District Bridge Inspection
Engineer (DBIE) to report the Deficiency and to receive further
instruction from him/her].
meterinft
SERIOUS
CRITICAL
(Y=Yes,N=No, NR=NotRequired)
2PAGE OF
I 58: I 59: I 60:
(V.C.R.)
TAPE#:
(Y/N):
1.
2.
3.
5.
6.
7.
8.
4.
B) Type of membrane -
(107) Deck Structure Type -
(40) Navigation Horizontal Clearance
(39) Navigation Vertical Clearance
(49) Structure Length
Under -
(43) Structure Type Main:
(45) Number of spans in main unit
(44) Structure Type Appr:
Structure Type and Material
(3) County Code (4) Place code
(6) Features Intersected
(7) Facility Carried
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Left Right
(52) Deck Width Out to Out
(32) Approach Roadway Width (w/shoulders)
Code
(53) Min Vert Clear Over Bridge Rdwy
(54) Min Vert Underclear ref
(55) Min Lat Underclear RT ref
(56) Min Lat Underclear LT
(38) Navigation Control -
MIN SEC
Actual
(68) Deck Geometry
(67) Structural Evaluation
(41) Structure -
Operating
Inventory
(*) Other Inspection ()
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
SCOUR: Please explain
93B-U/W (DIVE) Insp
ITEM 59 ITEM 60
CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. 41-STATUS 90-ROUTINE INSP. DATE
MEMORIAL NAME/LOCAL NAME 27-YR BUILT 106-YR REBUILT YR REHAB'D (NON
106)
06-FEATURES INTERSECTED 26-FUNCTIONAL CLASS
43-STRUCTURE TYPE 22-OWNER 21-MAINTAINER
G. Simpson
Town Agency
6 5 6
Wearing surface 6 M-P Stringers N - 6
Deck Condition 6 M-P Floorbeams N - Pedestals N N - Bridge Seats N
H -
Stay in Place Forms N - Floor System Bracing N - Backwalls N H
-
Curbs N - Girders or Beams 5 S-A Breastwalls N 6 M-P N 6 M-P
N - Trusses - General N - Wingwalls Median N N -N Slope
Paving/Rip-Rap
-N - Upper Chords Sidewalks Pointing N 5 M-P
Lower Chords N - N N - Parapets N - Footings
Web Members N - Piles N N - Railing 7 M-P Scour N 7 -
Lateral Bracing N - N - Settlement N 6 M-P
Anti Missile Fence Sway Bracings N - N N -
Drainage System N - Portals N - N N -
Lighting Standards N - N End Posts N -
5 S-A N N -Utilities Pin & Hangers N Pedestals - Caps N N
-
Deck Joints N - Conn Plt's, Gussets & Angles N - Columns N N
-
Cover Plates N N NN - - Stems/Webs/Pierwalls - Pointing N N -
N - Bearing Devices N - Footing N N - Diaphragms/Cross Frames N -
Piles N N -N -
N N NRivets & Bolts - Scour - Settlement N NN S -
Welds N - N N - N N Member Alignment 7 - N N -
Paint/Coating N N- N N -N Pile Caps
- Appr. pavement condition 5 M-P Piles N N -
Diagonal Bracing N N - Appr. Roadway Settlement 5 M-P Horizontal
Bracing N N - Appr. Sidewalk Settlement N - Fasteners N N -
XN - N
N X X
X Condition of Welds N - X Condition of Bolts N - N N 6 Condition
of Signs N -
N 00/00/0000
WATER BEAVER DAM BROOK
CLEARANCE POSTING
ITEM 61 (This Report):
Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural
components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting
structure stablility. Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective
action may put it back in light service.
Structural elements show some minor deterioration.
All primary structural elements are sound but may have minor
section loss, cracking, spalling or scour.
Advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour. Loss of
section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously affected
primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue
cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
Advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue
cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour
may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it
may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is
taken.
REASON:
Rating Report (Y/N):
CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION
RTB(2)04-07
ACCESSIBILITY
Lift Bucket Ladder Boat Waders Inspector 50 Rigging Staging Traffic
Control RR Flagger Police Other:
(Y/N/P) DEF
ITEM 36 TRAFFIC SAFETY 36 COND
A. Bridge Railing B. Transitions C. Approach Guardrail D. Approach
Guardrail Ends
ITEM 61
At bridge Other Advance
inft
S= Severe/Major Deficiency -
URGENCY OF REPAIR:
At bridge Advance
Dive Cur DEF
Deficiencies which are more extensive in nature and need more
planning and effort to repair. Examples include but are not limited
to: Moderate to major deterioration in concrete, Exposed and
corroded rebars, Considerable settlement, Considerable scouring or
undermining, Moderate to extensive corrosion to structural steel
with measurable loss of section, etc.
Deficiencies which are minor in nature, generally do not impact the
structural integrity of the bridge and could easily be repaired.
Examples include but are not limited to: Spalled concrete, Minor
pot holes, Minor corrosion of steel, Minor scouring, Clogged
drainage, etc.
A defect in a structure that requires corrective action.
[Shall be prioritized by District Maintenance Engineer or the
Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) and repairs made
when funds and/or manpower is available].
[Action/Repair should be initiated by District Maintenance Engineer
or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) upon receipt
of the Inspection Report].
A deficiency in a structural element of a bridge that poses an
extreme unsafe condition due to the failure or imminent failure of
the element which will affect the structural integrity of the
bridge.
C-H= Critical Hazard Deficiency - A deficiency in a component or
element of a bridge that poses an extreme hazard or unsafe
condition to the public, but does not impair the structural
integrity of the bridge. Examples include but are not limited to:
Loose concrete hanging down over traffic or pedestrians, A hole in
a sidewalk that may cause injuries to pedestrians, Missing section
of bridge railing, etc.
[Inspector(s) immediately contact District Bridge Inspection
Engineer (DBIE) to report the Deficiency and to receive further
instruction from him/her].
meterinft
SERIOUS
CRITICAL
P
C
C
3
2
1
0
EXCELLENT
Needed Used
(Y=Yes,N=No, NR=Not Required)
2PAGE OF
DEFICIENCY REPORTING GUIDE
Inspection data at time of existing rating I 58: I 59: I 60: Date
:
(V.C.R.)
TAPE#:
(Y/N):
1.
2.
3.
5.
6.
7.
8.
4.
3S2 SingleH 3
7 7 - N N N - N N 7 - N N
N 7 - 7 - Y Y N 7 - X N N
N 7 - N N N NN 8 - N N
N N - N N N N - N N N 8 -
N N - N N
0 0 0 0
00/00/0000
18
00/00/0000
PLYMOUTH AUG 10, 2020
BRIDGE ORIENTATION Brook Road is a one lane road oriented east and
west over Beaver Dam Brook which flows south to north in Plymouth,
Massachusetts.
GENERAL REMARKS The structure is constructed of 8 concrete encased
steel I-beams with a cast-in-place reinforced concrete deck on
field stone masonry abutments with a concrete cap. The beams and
bays are numbered from south to north. The previous inspection
numbered the beams and bays from north to south. Refer to Inventory
Photos, Sketches 1-3 .
ITEM 58 - DECK
Item 58.1 - Wearing surface The bituminous wearing surface has
transverse hairline cracks. Photo 1.
Item 58.2 - Deck Condition The reinforced concrete deck has areas
of honeycomb up to 1/4" deep. Photo 2. - The fascias of the
concrete deck have areas of scale up to 1/4" deep. - Beam 1
concrete encasement, north elevation, near the west abutment has a
spall 4' long x 3" high x 1/2" deep. Photo 3. - Beam 5 concrete
encasement, south elevation, near east abutment was not observed
this inspection. - Beam 7 concrete encasement, south elevation,
near east abutment has a spall 3' long x 2" high x 2 1/2" deep.
Photo 4. - Beam 7 concrete encasement, south elevation, near west
abtment has a spall 1' long x 2" high x 2 1/2" deep. Photo 5. - Bay
6 near the east abutment has a spall 4" long x 4" high x 1" deep
with exposed rebar. photo 6.
Item 58.8 - Railing The railing consists of steel W-beams
guardrails with steel posts running continuously over the bridge
and into the approaches. The railing is secured to the bridge with
anchor rods that run vertically through the bridge. - Both rails
have minor collisions scrapes throughout. Photo 7 for typical
condtions.
Item 58.12 - Utilities The steel water pipe along the south side of
the bridge is resting on concrete. The water pipe has no
insulation. The water pipe has a moisture stain. Photo 8.
APPROACHES
Approaches a - Appr. pavement condition - The bituminous wearing
surface has wheel ruts. - The southwest has moderate vegetation
growth that is starting to encroach toward the roadway. Photo 9. -
The east approach has sealed and unsealed cracking. Photos 10 &
11.
Approaches b - Appr. Roadway Settlement The northeast approach
roadway and the west approach roadway has settlement up to 1"
deep.
OF
PAGE
REM(2)10-16
ITEM 59 - SUPERSTRUCTURE
Item 59.4 - Girders or Beams The structure consists of 8 concrete
encased I-beams with exposed bottom flanges. The beams are labeled
1-8 from south to north. The steel beams have light rust. Beams 1
through 7 are within the travel way. Refer to Item 58.2 - Deck for
all concrete deficiencies. - Beam 1 bottom flange has heavy rust
and areas of 100% section loss up to 1' long x full width. Photos
12 & 13. - Beam 8 bottom flange has areas of pitting up to full
length. Photo 14.
ITEM 60 - SUBSTRUCTURE
Item 60.1 - Abutments Item 60.1.d - Breastwalls The breastwalls
consists of stone masonry abutments with mortar and reinforced
concrete caps. The reinforced concrete caps have areas of honeycomb
up to 1/4" deep and up to full height vertical hairline cracks. The
stone masonry has voids up to 10" deep, areas of crack mortar
(+/-20% of total area) and areas of missing mortar (+/-20% of total
area). West Abutment: - Below Beam 3, at west abutment: The
reinforced concrete cap has honeysombing. - Below Beam 4, at west
abutment: The reinforced concrete cap has full height diagonal
crack up to 1/8" wide. Photo 15. - Below Beam 3, at east abutment:
The reinforced concrete cap has a full height vertical crack up to
1/8" wide. Photo 16. - Below Beam 5: The reinforced concrete cap
has areas of honeycomb up to 1/4" deep. - The North End: The stone
masonry and mortar has areas of missing stones up to 10" deep and
areas of missing mortar. This portion has pulled away and the
mortar has fallen out leaving a 2" vertical gap. Photos 17 &
18. - The Northwest corner has multiple voids upto 22" deep. Photo
19.
Item 60.1.e - Wingwalls The wingwalls consists of stone masonry and
reinforced concrete caps. The northwest wingwall is leaning outward
up to 3" over 2' high. Photo 19. The wingwalls have moderate
vegetation growth. Photo 20.
Item 60.1.g - Pointing Along the waterline there is cracked and
missing mortar.
Item 60.1.k - Settlement Refer to Item 60.1.d - Breastwalls.
ITEM 61 - CHANNEL AND CHANNEL PROTECTION
Item 61.2 - Embankment Erosion The embankments have minor areas of
undercutting. The southeast embankment has a paved drainage swale
with minor erosion to the soil around it.
Item 61.3 - Debris The downstream and upstream channel have an
accumulation of timber debris.
OF
PAGE
REM(2)10-16
TRAFFIC SAFETY
Item 36a - Bridge Railing Refer to Item 58.8- Railing. This is
non-standard item.
Item 36c - Approach Guardrail Refer to Item 58.8 - Railing. The
approach W-beam guardrails have light rust. This is non-standard
item.
Item 36d - Approach Guardrail Ends Approach guardrail ends are
boxing glove ends with light rust. This is non-standard item.
Sketch / Photo Log Sketch 1 : Location Map. Sketch 2 : Plan View.
Sketch 3 : Elevation Views. Photo 1 : General wearing surface
looking west Photo 2 : General underside looking west. Photo 3 :
Beam 1 south elevation spall. Photo 4 : Beam 7 south elevation near
east abutment spall. Photo 5 : Beam 7 near west abutment spall.
Photo 6 : Bay 6 at east abutment minor spall. Photo 7 : South rail
minor collision damage scrapes. Photo 8 : South utility looking
east. Photo 9 : West approach, moderate vegetation growth. Photo 10
: East approach sealed and unsealed cracking. Photo 11 : East
approach looking east sealed and unsealed longitudinal cracking.
Photo 12 : Beam 1 looking west from midspan, section loss. Photo 13
: Beam 1 looking east from midspan, section loss. Photo 14 : Beam 8
looking east pitting. Photo 15 : West abutment below beam 3 &
4, honeycombing and cracking. Photo 16 : East abutment below beam 3
hairline vertical crack. Photo 17 : East breastwall overview
looking south. Photo 18 : West breastwall overview voids. Photo 19
: Northwest wingwall leaning and voids in breastwall. Photo 20 :
North elevation, vegetation growth.
OF
SKETCHES
PAGE
REM.(2)7-96
PAGE OF7 18
PAGE OF8 18
General underside looking west.
AUG 10, 2020PLYMOUTH P-13-011
PAGE 9 18OF
Beam 7 south elevation near east abutment spall.
AUG 10, 2020PLYMOUTH P-13-011
PAGE 10 18OF
Bay 6 at east abutment minor spall.
AUG 10, 2020PLYMOUTH P-13-011
PAGE 11 18OF
South utility looking east.
AUG 10, 2020PLYMOUTH P-13-011
PAGE 12 18OF
East approach sealed and unsealed cracking.
AUG 10, 2020PLYMOUTH P-13-011
PAGE 13 18OF
Beam 1 looking west from midspan, section loss.
AUG 10, 2020PLYMOUTH P-13-011
PAGE 14 18OF
Beam 8 looking east pitting.
AUG 10, 2020PLYMOUTH P-13-011
PAGE 15 18OF
East abutment below beam 3 hairline vertical crack.
AUG 10, 2020PLYMOUTH P-13-011
PAGE 16 18OF
West breastwall overview voids.
AUG 10, 2020PLYMOUTH P-13-011
PAGE 17 18OF
North elevation, vegetation growth.
AUG 10, 2020PLYMOUTH P-13-011
PAGE 18 18OF
Code
Code
Code
Classification
BDEPT#=
(35) Structure Flared
(33) Bridge Median -
B) Type of membrane -
(107) Deck Structure Type -
(40) Navigation Horizontal Clearance
(39) Navigation Vertical Clearance
(49) Structure Length
Under -
(43) Structure Type Main:
(45) Number of spans in main unit
(44) Structure Type Appr:
(8) Structure Number
(16) Latitude
(5) Inventory Route (2) State Highway Department District (3)
County Code (4) Place code
(6) Features Intersected (7) Facility Carried
(9) Location
(11) Kilometerpoint
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Left Right
(52) Deck Width Out to Out
(32) Approach Roadway Width (w/shoulders)
Code
(53) Min Vert Clear Over Bridge Rdwy
(54) Min Vert Underclear ref
(55) Min Lat Underclear RT ref
(56) Min Lat Underclear LT
(38) Navigation Control - (111) Pier Protection Code
(12) Base Highway Network
MIN SEC
0.2 MI. EAST OF ST 3A 03
0000.000 03
Bridge Name
Status Posting Date 00/00/00
N / N Liftbucket N / N N / N N / N N / N Y / Y N / N
N / N
N / N
Ladder Staging Boat Traffic Control Wader RR Flagperson Inspector
50 Police
Inspection Hours: 016
MO A)
MO B)
MO C)
(36) Traffic Safety Features (72) Approach Roadway Alignment (71)
Waterway adequacy (69) Underclearances, vert. and horiz. (68) Deck
Geometry (67) Structural Evaluation
(41) Structure -
(58) Deck (59) Superstructure (60) Substructure (61) Channel &
Channel Protection
(70) Bridge Posting
0 2
00.0 2
0 N 0 0
00/00/00
H20 Type 3 Type 3S2 Type HS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
(*) UW Special Inspection MO *)00 00/00/00
(*) Other Inspection ()
Missing Signs
On free road
N
N
N
N
Unknown
L=103.19' T=51.60'
B.O.
PROP. FULL DEPTH RECONSTRUCTION
FOR DETAILS
WETLAND REPLICATION AREA SEE LANDSCAPE DETAILS
R&R
LINE OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TYP.)
LINE OF PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT
LIMITS OF WORK (TYP.)
LIMITS OF WORK (TYP.)
STONE FOR EROSION CONTROL
RELOCATE UP B.O.
PROP. GRAN. CURB
TOTAL SHEETS
2192599
7
HIGHWAY GUARD DETAILS STA. 3+59.97 (BEGIN HIGHWAY GUARDRAIL
TRANSITION) LT STA. 3+78.82 (BEGIN HIGHWAY GUARDRAIL TRANSITION)
RT
STA. 4+50.00 (END BRIDGE RAIL & BEGIN HIGHWAY GUARDRAIL
TRANSITION) RT
STA. 4+51.27 (END BRIDGE RAIL & BEGIN HIGHWAY GUARDRAIL
TRANSITION) LT
VA5 GRANITE CURBING STA. 3+72.91 LT TO STA. 3+88.02 LT STA. 4+09.52
LT TO STA. 4+18.71 LT
WATER SUPPLY ALTERATIONS SEE BELOW
DRAINAGE DETAILS SEE BRIDGE PLANS
LANDSCAPE DETAILS SEE LANDSCAPE DETAILS
STONE FOR EROSION CONTROL STA. 4+50.00 RT TO STA. 4+57.45 RT STA.
4+51.27 LT TO STA. 4+58.71 LT
PLYMOUTH
AutoCAD SHX Text
MAP 45 LOT 32B N/F THOMAS F. & CYNTHIA M. KENNEDY BK:21899
PG:97
AutoCAD SHX Text
MAP 45 LOT 32A N/F THOMAS F. KENNEDY JR. BK:40714 PG:308
AutoCAD SHX Text
MAP 45 LOT 3A N/F FRANCIS J. & CAROL A. KUHN L.C. CERT
No.65134
AutoCAD SHX Text
MAP 45 LOT 81A N/F BENJAMIN B. & DEBRA W. BREWSTER L.C. CERT
No.82530
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
MAP 45 LOT 12B N/F BETH ANN & JOHN D. CLARK BK:43050
PG:36
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
MAP 45 LOT 30A-1 N/F RICHARD D. KING TRUST OF 2017, RICHARD D.
KING, TRUSTEE BK:49123 PG:73
AutoCAD SHX Text
MAP 45 LOT 33 N/F KATHARINE F. FREELAND MARY E. BACON & DOROTHY
E. WOOLEY PLYMOUTH PROBATES No. 72960
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
191.93'
L
0
10
20
PV T:
3 +7
6. 31
EL EV
: 1 3.
NAVD 88 BASE ELEV -5.00
0
10
20
N
N
TOTAL SHEETS
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
PROP. WATER LINE
AutoCAD SHX Text
EXIST. WATER LINE
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
PROP. INTEGRAL ABUTMENT
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
12" = 1'-0" VERTICAL
AutoCAD SHX Text
INDEX TO DRAWINGS
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 - KEY PLAN, PROFILES & LOCUS MAP 2 - GENERAL NOTES &
HYDRAULIC DATA 3 - BORING LOGS 4 - PLAN & SOUTH ELEVATION 5 -
NORTH ELEVATION 6 - ABUTMENT PLAN & ELEVATION 7 - ABUTMENT PILE
LAYOUT 8 - ABUTMENT & WINGWALL DETAILS 9 - MISCELLANEOUS
DETIALS 10 - WINGWALL, RIPRAP, & JOINT DETAILS 11 - FRAMING
PLAN, BEAM, & DIAPHRAGM DETAILS 12 - CROSS SECTIONS &
UTILITY SUPPORT DETAIL 13 - DECK DETAILS 14 - MOMENT SLAB &
PREFABRICATED ENGINEERED WALL DETAILS 15 - BRIDGE RAILING DETAILS
16 - PRECAST HIGHWAY GUARDRAIL TRANSITIONS 17 - TOP OF PRECAST
HIGHWAY GUARDRAIL TRANSITIONS
AutoCAD SHX Text
BRIDGE NO. P-13-011
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
R=200.00' Δ=35 04'20" Δ=35°04'20"L=122.43' T=63.20'
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
R=500.00' Δ=6 52'09" Δ=6°52'09"L=59.94' T=30.01'
AutoCAD SHX Text
APPROVED UNDER PROVISIONS OF MASS. GEN. LAWS CH 85 S 35
AutoCAD SHX Text
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOTAL SHEETS
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
PROP. WATER LINE
AutoCAD SHX Text
CONSTRUCTION JOINT CONTINUE APPROACH SLAB REINFORCEMENT INTO MOMENT
SLAB FOR DETAIL SEE SHEET 14
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
3'-0" DEEP x 2'-6" MIN. WIDE TRENCH FILLED WITH CRUSHED STONE
(M2.01.6) AFTER DRIVING PILE (TYP.)
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION
AutoCAD SHX Text
SCALE: " = 1'-0"14" = 1'-0"
AutoCAD SHX Text
APPROVED UNDER PROVISIONS OF MASS. GEN. LAWS CH 85 S 35
AutoCAD SHX Text
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOTAL SHEETS
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
3'-0" DEEP x 2'-6" MIN. WIDE TRENCH FILLED WITH CRUSHED STONE
(M2.01.6) AFTER DRIVING PILE (TYP.)
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION
AutoCAD SHX Text
SCALE: " = 1'-0"14" = 1'-0"
AutoCAD SHX Text
APPROVED UNDER PROVISIONS OF MASS. GEN. LAWS CH 85 S 35
AutoCAD SHX Text
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
AutoCAD SHX Text
DATE
TOWN OF PLYMOUTH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN REQUEST FORM FY22 ANNUAL
TOWN MEETING REQUEST FORM
Department: DPW, Engineering Division Priority #: 2
Project Title and Description: Traffic Sign & Signal Asset
Management Total
Project Cost: $150,000 Department/Division Head: Check if project
is: New Resubmitted Cost estimate was developed: Internally
Externally For project re-submittals, list prior year(s): List any
funding sources and amounts already granted:
Basis of Estimated Costs (attach additional information if
available)
If project has impact on 5 Year Plan and future operating budgets,
insert estimated amounts.
Capital: Cost Comments Fiscal Year: Capital Operations &
Maintenance
Labor and Materials FY23
Project Justification and Objective: The proposed Traffic Sign
& Signal Asset Management program is a comprehensive inventory
of the
Town’s existing traffic signals, school flashers and traffic signs.
The data collected will be incorporated into the Town’s GIS
database,
providing an accessible means to identify, evaluate and manage the
Town’s traffic sign and signal infrastructure. The project will
include the
inspection and evaluation of signal equipment, collection of
traffic counts, signal timing modifications as well as short-,
medium- and long-
term capital improvement recommendations. Additionally, traffic
signs throughout Town will be inventoried, added to the Town’s
GIS
database and evaluated for safety and MUTCD compliance. This
proposed asset management program will complement the Town’s
existing
Pavement Management Program and establish a GIS-based platform for
the Town to manage its traffic signs and signals. For Capital
Project Requests: Will this project be phased over more than one
fiscal year? If yes, enter it on the 5 Year Plan Yes No Can this
project be phased over more than one fiscal year? Yes No For
Capital Equipment Requests:
Check if equipment requested is replacement and enter the year,
make & model, VIN and present condition of existing equipment
What is the expected lifespan of this new/replacement equipment:
Attach backup information, estimates, or justification to support
this request.
Sheila Sgarzi, Town Engineer
FY18, FY19, FY20, FY21
BETA GROUP, INC. www.BETA-Inc.com
October 20, 2020
Ms. Shelia Sgarzi, P.E. Town Engineer Town of Plymouth 26 Court
Street Plymouth, MA 02347
Re: Town-wide Traffic Signal & Sign Inventory
Dear Ms. Sgarzi:
BETA Group, Inc. (BETA) is pleased to submit this proposal to
continue to provide the Town of Plymouth with GIS/Asset Management
services. To date, BETA has assisted the Town with the development
of its pavement management program, ADA pilot program as well as
providing support services to maintain the platform. It is our
understanding that the Town would like to complete a Town-wide
inventory of traffic signals and signs to establish a comprehensive
database and compliance program that will integrate into the Town’s
existing Geographic Information System (GIS). Each of these
projects will be conducted separately, but for the purpose of this
proposal BETA has been asked to combine both projects into the
following scope of services.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
PROJECT 1 – TOWN-WIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL INVENTORY
BETA Group will provide Traffic Engineering Services through
conducting a field inventory of existing traffic signal equipment.
Field data collection will be supplemented with photos and
integrated into the Town’s existing GIS as mentioned above.
According to Town records, the Town has 25 Town-owned full
intersection signals, 2 Town-owned Emergency Vehicle signals, 1
Town-owned Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon, 5 Town-owned Flashing Beacon
signals, 26 Town-owned Flashing School Zone signals and 12
State-owned full intersection signals. For the purposes of this
proposal, it is anticipated that all Town-owned signals including
the 25 Town-owned full intersections and 34 Flashing beacons and/or
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons will be evaluated.
TASK 1 – DATABASE SETUP & FIELD INVENTORY OF EXISTING
SIGNALS
The town will provide BETA with all available signal plans,
permits, as-built drawings, and any prior inventory reports for
review in the setup of the signal database. This information will
serve as the foundation for the field work to be conducted by BETA
field staff. Once all relevant data has been compiled and the
signal database built to the standard of the Town BETA will have a
trained field crew to conduct the actual inventory of all existing
signals mentioned above.
The field inventory will consist of the following comprehensive
approach:
A. Conduct an inventory of existing signals including: · Controller
and cabinet, and ancillary equipment
Ms. Shelia Sgarzi, P.E. October 20, 2020 Page 2 of 6
BETA GROUP, INC. www.BETA-Inc.com
· Vehicular and pedestrian signal heads (size, type, location, and
number) · Signal posts, mast arms, and span wires · Pedestrian push
buttons · Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS) · Countdown
pedestrian signals · Associate signing (“No Turn on Red”, etc.) ·
Signal phasing and timing · Detectors · Preemption ·
Interconnection
B. Check working condition of all signal hardware C. Identify
Coordination Type D. Note Operation Status (fixed time,
semi-actuated, fully actuated) E. Observe deficiencies at full
intersection signals F. Locate and perform cursory review of
existing curb ramps for APS locations
The next step in this task will be to check for compliance with
MUTCD, State, and Local ordinances in order to note any
deficiencies that may exist. BETA will also prepare a photo log as
part of this task to highlight any of the deficiencies noted during
the compliance review.
The deliverables from this task will consist of the following
items: · GIS database (structured to work in conjunction with the
Town’s existing Asset Management
Program) · Microsoft Access Database Inventory · Geocoded photos of
existing equipment · Existing Signal Plans (where provided) and all
Signal Timing Sheets
TASK 2 – TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
In Phase I, improvement recommendations are based on an inventory
of existing equipment, or the lack thereof. In this phase, BETA
will carry out an assessment of existing operations that will
identify further deficiencies. Due to the current COVID-19
pandemic, traffic data collection may not be appropriate at the
time of Notice to Proceed. Phase 2 could be removed from scope upon
Town’s request without affecting other Phases.
Traffic Counts will be conducted in the morning (7:00 – 9:00 AM)
and afternoon (4:00 – 6:00 PM) during peak hour turning movement
counts (TMC’s) at each of the twenty-five (25) fully operational
locations. The counts will provide a basis for traffic analysis and
evaluation of existing and future traffic operations. BETA does not
recommend collecting traffic data at the remaining intersections
since flashing operation, school crossings and emergency fire
station signals do not experience intermittent, rotating movement
of vehicles in a manner that can be described by analysis of
traffic volumes. Traffic analysis will then be conducted for each
of the twenty-five (25) fully operational locations. Analysis will
be conducted during morning and afternoon peak periods for existing
and future conditions.
Ms. Shelia Sgarzi, P.E. October 20, 2020 Page 3 of 6
BETA GROUP, INC. www.BETA-Inc.com
TASK 3 – EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT
Recommendations will be based on the field inventory, observations,
and traffic data. BETA will investigate traffic measures to improve
traffic flow and safety, as well as improvements to be developed in
a three staged process:
· Short term improvements are those that can result from timing and
phasing modifications. (assuming completion of Phase 2 of this
scope)
· Medium Term improvements are those that the Town can undertake
with its own forces for a limited cost. Typical cost of improvement
measures in this category will be under $2,500.
· Long Term improvements will include significant measures that can
be included in the capital improvement plan.
BETA will provide a report detailing findings related to existing
and future conditions of all traffic signal hardware and curb
ramps. The report will include supporting graphics, a summary of
findings, and cost estimates for recommended improvements at each
location.
TASK 4 – IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION OF SHORT-TERM/IMMEDIATE
RECOMMENDATIONS
Upon approval from the Town, BETA will perform field adjustments
limited to timing and phasing modifications, and other signal
parameters that can be adjusted within the controller. No physical
changes are included in this task. All field adjustments will be
documented in Existing Signal Plans (where provided) or Signal
Timing Sheets as appropriate.
TASK 5 – MEETINGS
This scope incudes four (4) formal meetings, including a kick-off
meeting, a meeting to present findings subsequent to Task 5 to
present all findings, a third meeting to review proposed
improvements, and a fourth to review the Draft Report.
DELIVERABLES The scope of services will include the following
deliverables:
· Geographic Information System (GIS) database · Microsoft Access
Database Inventory · Geocoded photos of existing intersections ·
Traffic Signal Inventory Report · Copies of all field sheets,
worksheets and any other material developed for this project
(provided in both hard copy and electronic format) · Photo Log of
all Equipment Deficiencies
Ms. Shelia Sgarzi, P.E. October 20, 2020 Page 4 of 6
BETA GROUP, INC. www.BETA-Inc.com
FEE PROPOSAL
The preceding scope of work will be completed for a not to exceed
amount of $83,700 and is broken down as follows:
Project 1 – Traffic Signal Inventory Task 1: Field Inventory of
Existing Signals $40,000 Task 2: Traffic Data Collection $12,000
Task 3: Evaluation and Recommendations Report $10,000 Task 4:
Implementation $10,000 Task 5: Meetings $3,000 Subtotal
$75,000
Direct Costs Mileage $1,200 Traffic Counts $7,500 Subtotal
$8,700
Not to Exceed Amount Total $83,700
PROJECT 2 – TRAFFIC SIGN INVENTORY & COMPLIANCE PLAN
BETA will work with the Town to conduct an inventory of traffic
signs that exist along Town accepted streets. The sign types to be
inventoried will consist of existing regulatory, warning, parking,
and school traffic signs. The level of effort for this project
assumes an inventory allowance of 2,500 traffic signs to be
collected.
TASK 1 – SYSTEM SETUP & DATA COLLECTION PROGRAM
The GIS base mapping will consist of orthophotography and a series
of data layers. This data will facilitate the mapping of each sign
within a GIS environment. Field crews will utilize field tablets
(Arc Collector App) to access inventory and inspection forms. Each
sign will be spatially located as a point on the GIS base map and
attributed accordingly.
Attribute data to be developed will include the following:
· Sign ID · Sign Type · MUTCD Designation · Size · Sheeting Type –
Engineering Grade, Diamond Grade (DG), High Intensity Prismatic
(HIP) · Sign Support · Condition (Good, Damaged – Replace or Reset)
· If Stop Sign, is a Stop Bar Present (Yes/No) · Picture of Sign ·
Plow Route or Maintenance District
Ms. Shelia Sgarzi, P.E. October 20, 2020 Page 5 of 6
BETA GROUP, INC. www.BETA-Inc.com
TASK 2 – DATA ANALYSIS, REPORTING, & GIS MAPPING
A series of existing conditions reports, and GIS maps will be
submitted detailing the general condition of each sign collected as
mentioned above. In addition, a Retroreflectivity Testing Program
will be conducted and will focus on testing priority signs or
types. For this proposal, we have established an allowance of
approximately 500 signs to be tested. Testing will focus on Stop
and Speed limits signs and those consisting of DG and HIP
sheeting.
The following deliverables will be submitted upon completing the
field investigation as described above:
· Tabular Inventory Reports (MS Access-based) · Sign Inventory
Database (ESRI Geo-Database) · Large format GIS Maps as
directed
TASK 3 –COMPLIANCE REVIEW & CIP DEVELOPMENT
Based on the data collected a review of each sign will be conducted
by BETA to confirm that each sign collected meets the 2009 Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) compliance, as well as
recent amendments to the MUTCD regulations. This task will also
look to review compliance based on the retroreflectivity testing
outlined in Task 2, sheeting type, size, color, mounting height,
and legend. However, advisory speed signs will not be checked for
MUTCD compliance.
BETA will also work with the Town to develop a Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP) based on designated priority areas or corridors. This
CIP will also look to achieve compliance within a given timeframe
based on the priority areas, as well as available funding. This
plan will serve as the foundation of a replacement program for non-
compliant signs and include the areas where potential signs could
exist per local ordinance. The recommendations garnered from this
CIP will provide support to the Town for effective and efficient
use of available funds.
Ms. Shelia Sgarzi, P.E. October 20, 2020 Page 6 of 6
BETA GROUP, INC. www.BETA-Inc.com
FEE PROPOSAL
The preceding scope of work will be completed for a not to exceed
amount of $54,250 and is broken down as follows:
Project 2 – Traffic Sign Inventory & Compliance Plan
Task 1 – System Setup & Sign Inventory Program (2,500 Traffic
Signs) $32,000*
Task 2 – Analysis, Reporting, & GIS Mapping $9,500
Task 3 – Compliance Review & CIP Development $12,750 Not to
Exceed Amount Total $54,250
*Street Name signs can be collected for an additional
$10,000.
Overall Project Fee Project 1 – Traffic Signal Inventory $83,700
Project 2 – Traffic Sign Inventory & Compliance Plan $54,250
Total Project Amount $137,950
Thank you for the opportunity to continue assisting the Town of
Plymouth with the further development of its Asset Management
Program. If you have any questions or require additional
information on this proposal, please feel free to contact me at
(508) 769-2807.
Sincerely, BETA Group, Inc.
Anthony J. Garro Senior Vice President GIS & Asset Management
Services
Your signature on a copy of this correspondence, returned to this
office, will be considered acceptance of the scope of work and fee
contained herein, and as authorization to proceed.
…………………………………………………………………………
_______________________________________________ Signature
_______________________________________________ Name
_______________________________________________ Title
___________________________________________ Date
TOWN OF PLYMOUTH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN REQUEST FORM FY22 ANNUAL
TOWN MEETING REQUEST FORM
Department: DPW, Engineering Division Priority #: 3
Project Title and Description: Manomet Avenue Wicking Wells
Total
Project Cost: $450,000 Department/Division Head: Check if project
is: New Resubmitted Cost estimate was developed: Internally
Externally For project re-submittals, list prior year(s): List any
funding sources and amounts already granted:
Basis of Estimated Costs (attach additional information if
available)
If project has impact on 5 Year Plan and future operating budgets,
insert estimated amounts.
Capital: Cost Comments Fiscal Year: Capital Operations &
Maintenance
Planning and Design Design will be done by in-house Engineering
staff
FY22
Administration FY24
Project Justification and Objective: Stormwater discharge along
Manomet Avenue has been exacerbating erosion issues along the
bluff
that runs parallel to the street. There is a confining clay layer
located approximately 30 to 40 feet below the surface of the road.
This clay
layer intercepts subsurface stormwater infiltration and redirects
it toward the adjacent cliff face, which contributes to erosion of
the cliff. The
proposed wicking wells are intended to direct stormwater below the
clay layer, which will allow the stormwater to infiltrate into the
deeper,
permeable subsurface materials. The design and construction of a
wicking well is very similar to a traditional groundwater well. But
instead
of pumping water out of the ground, the wicking well directs water
into the ground. The proposed project will involve the installation
of three
of wicking wells, each approximately 80 to 90 feet deep. The
project will also include drainage upgrades and final asphalt
restoration along
approximately 1,500 linear feet of Manomet Avenue. For Capital
Project Requests: Will this project be phased over more than one
fiscal year? If yes, enter it on the 5 Year Plan Yes No Can this
project be phased over more than one fiscal year? Yes No For
Capital Equipment Requests:
Check if equipment requested is replacement and enter the year,
make & model, VIN and present condition of existing equipment
What is the expected lifespan of this new/replacement equipment:
Attach backup information, estimates, or justification to support
this request.
Sheila Sgarzi, Town Engineer
FY21
COST ESTIMATE WICK WELL INSTALLTION AND ASSOCIATED WORK 3 WICK
WELLS - DRAINAGE STRUCTURES - RE-PAVE 1,500 L.F. OF MANOMET AVE
ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST COST
1 DOUBLE CATCH BASIN 5' DIA. 6 EACH $3,400.00 $20,400.00 2 CATCH
BASIN 5' DIA. 2 EACH $3,200.00 $6,400.00 3 4' DIA DRAIN MANHOLE W/
SUMP 4 EACH $3,100.00 $12,400.00 4 12" HDPE PIPE 300 L.F. $55.00
$16,500.00 5 6' DIA DRAIN MANHOLE 3 EACH $5,000.00 $15,000.00 6
RECLAIMED ASPHALT BASE - FOR TEMP/DRAIN INSTALL 150 TON $22.00
$3,300.00 7 ASPHALT FOR TRENCH PATCHES 60 TON $250.00 $15,000.00 8
CRUSHED STONE - PIPE BEDDING 75 TON $20.00 $1,500.00 9 SAWCUTTING
700 L.F. $2.00 $1,400.00 10 12" SILT SOCK 200 L.F. $9.00 $1,800.00
11 LOAM 110 CY $15.00 $1,650.00 12 CLEAN FILL 150 CY $22.00
$3,300.00 13 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 150 C.Y. $10.00 $1,500.00 14
SEEDING 1,000 S.Y. $1.00 $1,000.00 15 WATER GATE ADJUST 10 EACH
$100.00 $1,000.00 16 WELL CAPS 7 EACH $500.00 $3,500.00 17 WELL
CLEANING 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 18 TEST BORINGS 1 LS $20,000.00
$20,000.00 19 WICK WELLS 3 EACH $40,000.00 $120,000.00 20 ASPHALT
DRIVEWAY APRONS 30 TONS $100.00 $3,000.00 21 MILL 3,400 S.Y. $2.50
$8,500.00 22 OVERLAY 4" (SHIM & 2" OVERLAY) 750 TON $77.25
$57,937.50
Plymouth Enginering Division 10/29/2020 $335,087.50
$50,263.13
$57,802.59
$443,153.22
TOTAL
S:\Capital Improvement Plan\FY22 Capital Improvment Plan - Spring
2021\Capital Requests\#3 Wicking Wells - Manomet Avenue\Backup
Info\PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 10-29-2020
TOWN OF PLYMOUTH
PROPOSED WICK WELL
PROPOSED WICK WELL #1
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
PROPOSED WICK WELL #1 LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF MANOMET AVENUE
& BREWSTER AVENUE
AutoCAD SHX Text
FUTURE DRAIN MANOLE
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOWN OF PLYMOUTH
PROPOSED WICK WELL #2
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
PROPOSED WICK WELL #2 LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF MANOMET AVENUE
& BRADFORD AVENUE
TOWN OF PLYMOUTH
PROPOSED WICK WELL #3
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
FUTURE DRAIN MANOLE
AutoCAD SHX Text
Five Year Plan
#3 Manomet Avenue Wicking Wells