FY 2019 - FY 2023 Bay County TPO Project Priorities · FY 2019 - FY 2023 Bay County TPO Project Priorities Prepared for Bay County Transportation Planning Organization; ... 23 Bicycle

FY 2019 - FY 2023 Bay County TPO Project Priorities

Prepared for

Bay County Transportation Planning Organization; and The Florida Department of Transportation, District Three

Prepared by

West Florida Regional Planning Council Staff to the Bay County Transportation Planning Organization

This report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, the Florida Department of Transportation, and local

participating governments, in partial fulfillment of UPWP Work Task C.1. This document does not necessarily reflect the official reviews or policies of the U.S. Department

of Transportation.

Adopted: July 26, 2017

Amended:

Bay County Transportation Planning Organization

FY 2019 - 2023 Project Priorities Document

Prepared by

West Florida Regional Planning Council Staff to the Bay County Transportation Planning Organization

The Bay County Transportation Planning Organization can be reached at:

Post Office Box 11399 4081 E. Olive Road, Suite A Pensacola, Florida 32524-1399 Pensacola, Florida 32514 Phone: Fax: (800) 226-8914 (850) 637-1923 (850) 332-7976

Staff contact for this report: Gary Kramer, Transportation Planner IV [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Bay County TPO FY 2019-FY 2023 Project Priorities i

Table of Contents Section Page Numbers NTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1

METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3

Table 1: FY 19 - 23 Committed Non-Strategic Intermodal System (Non-SIS) Project Priorities .................................................................................... 5

Table 2: FY 19 - 23 Non-Strategic Intermodal Systems (Non-SIS) Project Priorities ...................................................................................................... 6

Table 3: FY 19 - 23 Committed Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Project Priorities .................................................................................................. 10

Table 4: FY 19 - 23 Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Project Priorities ...................................................................................................................... 11

Table 5: FY 19 - 23 Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Project Priorities ....................................................................................................... 13

Table 6: FY 19 - 23 Committed Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Project Priorities ................................................................................. 15

Table 7: FY 19 - 23 Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Project Priorities .................................................................................................... 17

Table 8: FY 19 - 23 Committed Bicycle & Pedestrian Project Priorities ....................................................................................................................... 18

Table 9: FY 19 - 23 Bicycle & Pedestrian Project Priorities .......................................................................................................................................... 19

Table 10: FY 19 - 23 Committed Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Project Priorities ................................................................................. 20

Table 11: FY 19 - 23 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Project Priorities .................................................................................................... 21

Table 12: FY 19 - 23 Bay County Public Transportation Project Priorities by Grant .................................................................................................... 22

Table 13: FY 19 - 23 Aviation Project Priorities – Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport .......................................................................... 24

Table 14: FY 19 - 23 Seaport Project Priorities – Port Panama City ............................................................................................................................. 27

Bay County TPO FY 2019 - FY 2023 Project Priorities ii

List of Appendices Appendix A – Multimodal Studies

Appendix B – Evaluation Criteria

Appendix C – Public Comments

Appendix D – Resolution BAY 17-09

Bay County TPO FY 2019 - FY 2023 Project Priorities 1

NTRODUCTION

The Bay County Transportation Planning Organization (TPO), staffed by the West Florida Regional Planning Council, is tasked with developing Project

Priorities. Project Priorities, which are essentially the Cost Feasible Plan element of the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), are usually approved in

September each year and are due to the State Department of Transportation by October 1st. However, this year the Florida Department of Transportation

requested the Project Priorities by August 1, 2017 which required adoption by the TPO at their July 2017 meeting. The adopted Project Priorities are used

by the State Department of Transportation to develop a five-year Work Program. This five-year Work Program is then used by the TPO to develop its five-

year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The TIP is adopted by the TPO at its June meeting each year. The chart below explains the process

identified above.

LRTP

Priorities

FDOT5 Year Work

ProgramTIP

Implement

Projects

Bay County TPO FY 2019 - FY 2023 Project Priorities -2

The projects listed in this Project Priorities document are identified by the following tables:

• Capacity Projects (Tables 1-4).

• Community Redevelopment Agency Projects (Table 5).

• Transportation System Management Projects (Tables 6-7).

• Bicycle/Pedestrian Related Projects (Tables 8-9).

• Transportation Alternatives Program Projects (Tables 10-11).

• Public Transportation Related Projects (Tables 12).

• Aviation Projects (Table 13).

• Port Projects (Table 14).

METHODOLOGY

• Capacity projects are based on the 2040 LRTP. Completed projects are removed from the list. Projects scheduled for construction in first three

years are moved to the committed list. Non - SIS projects are ranked on three categories: existing priorities; new box funds end of the box fund

list by dollar amount and program lists; and new projects end of the list by Needs Plan Evaluation Criteria rankings. SIS projects are ranked on two

categories-existing priorities and new projects at the end of the list by existing Non-SIS priorities and then by Needs Plan Evaluation Criteria

rankings.

• Community Redevelopment Agency Projects are furnished by the City of Panama City Beach.

• Transportation System Management Projects are ranked based on TPO approved criteria. Projects were provided by the Florida Department of

Transportation.

• Bicycle/Pedestrian projects are ranked based on TPO approved criteria as recommended by a committee of the TCC and CAC.

• Transportation Alternatives Program Projects are ranked based on TPO approved criteria.

• Public Transportation Related Projects are listed by potential grants and were furnished by the TPO’s Public Transportation Staff in consultation

with Bay Town Trolley Staff.

• Aviation Project Priorities are furnished by the Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport.

• Port Project Priorities are provided by Port Panama City.

The Capacity, Transportation System Management, Bicycle/Pedestrian, and Transportation Alternatives Program Projects have listed Committed Projects

in addition to the Project Priorities. Committed Projects are projects that are scheduled for construction in the first three years of the Work Program or

are currently under construction. These projects are considered Committed so the projects get completed and are not assigned a Project Priority.

However, it is understood that these projects are to continue to be funded by the Department of Transportation until the projects are completed.


The statuses of the phases for the Capacity Projects have been color coded to indicate funding. Phases in GREEN are considered Cost Feasible with State

and/or Federal funds. This is based on the current 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan. If the phase is currently scheduled for completion in the FDOT Five Year

Work Program, the fiscal year of funding and the project number are noted. Phases in RED are not considered cost feasible with State and/or Federal funds

based on the currently adopted 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan. In addition, projects shaded in yellow are the next phases to be funded.

The Capacity, Transportation System Management, Transportation Alternatives Program, and Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects have separate Evaluation Criteria

to rank projects. The Evaluation Criteria for these four categories are listed in Appendix B. However, the TPO has the final decision on how the Project

Priorities are ranked.

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

Two Public Workshops were held on May 1, 2017. The locations of the workshops were the Lynn Haven City Hall and the Gulf Coast State College in

Panama City. In addition, two TPO and Advisory Committee Workshops were held. The first workshop was on May 22, 2017 at the Panama City Beach

Library whereas the June 29, 2017 workshop was at the Bay County Administration Building in Panama City. Each of the workshops were advertised in the

Panama City News Herald. An e-mail notice was also sent to the TPO and Advisory Committee Members. News releases were distributed to media outlets

and meeting information was promoted through social media sites. Flyers were created and emailed to members of the TPO and advisory committees.

Comments from the public workshops were identified in the TPO and Advisory Committee Members June and July agenda enclosures and are included in

Appendix C. A Public Hearing was also held at the TPO meeting in July. However, no individuals spoke at the Public Hearing. However, the Project Priorities

Tables from drafts through adoption were posted on the web site for review and comment. The Project Priorities were a review item at the June TPO

Meeting and were approved at the July TPO Meeting (See Resolution BAY 17 – 09 in Appendix D) with the following changes:

• Table 2, Non-SIS o Switch Priorities 3 (Public Transportation) and 4 (Transportation System Management). o Move Priorities 6 (Park and Ride Lot at SR 77 and SR 20) and 7 (Park and Ride Lot at US 231 and Vicinity of Industrial Park) to Priorities 22 and

23. o Switch Priorities 18 (West Bay Parkway Extension from SR 77 to SR 75 (US 231) and 22 (Loop Road Phase 2 from Bay Parkway to Nautilus

Street). o Move Priorities 16 (SR 388 from E of Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport to East of Burnt Mill Creek) and 17 (SR 388 from East of

Burnt Mill Creek to SR 77) Priorities 24 and 25.

• Table 4, SIS o Move Priority 5 East Avenue from Sherman Avenue to SR 2312 (Baldwin Avenue) to Priority 2 and corresponding priorities moved down on

the list.


• Table 7, TSM o Include new project “Signalized intersection switching upgrades” to Priority 3 and the corresponding projects moved down on the list.

• Table 13, AVIATION PROJECT PRIORITIES o Replace existing priorities with update priorities provided by the Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport.

• Table 15, CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) PROJECT PRIORITIES o Remove Table from Project Priorities because current intersection projects that are funded with these funds improve air quality in the

urbanized area. If these funds are diverted to the TPO’s Air Quality Fuel Initiative, it would take funds away from these intersection projects.


Table 1: FY 19 - 23 Committed Non-Strategic Intermodal System (Non-SIS) Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking

Construction funded in the first three years of the Transportation Improvement Program or Underway

FDOT Item-Segment

Project Name From To Project Phase Status Improvement

4263914 US 98A/SR 30/Front

Beach Road Segment 2

Richard Jackson Boulevard

South Thomas Drive

PD&E – Complete

Transit Lanes Design – Complete

ROW –Complete

Construction – Underway

Local Project Jenks Avenue 23rd Street Baldwin Road

PD&E -- Complete

Widen to 5 lanes Design – Complete

ROW – Complete


4316841 US 98/Tyndall Air Force

Base US 98

Tyndall Air Force Base

PD&E – Complete Construct grade

separated interchange

Design – Funded FY 17/18

ROW – Not Required

Construction – Funded FY 17/18


Table 2: FY 19 - 23 Non-Strategic Intermodal Systems (Non-SIS) Project Priorities

FDOT Item-Segment

Project Name From To

Phases in Green are Cost Feasible with State/Federal

Funds in the 2040 LRTP - Red phases are NOT Cost Feasible

with State/Federal Funds

Improvement FY 19-23 Priority Ranking

4084123 Operations and Maintenance of the current ITS System $500,000 1

N/A CR 30 (Front Beach

Road) Kelly Street

Panama City Beach Parkway (US 98)

Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects1 $450,000 Construction of Sidewalks

2

4336121 Transportation System Management (TSM)

Improvements $350,000 3

4282091 Public Transportation Capital Improvements2 $350,000 4

4399281 City of Lynn Haven Rails

to Trails US 231

10th Street Dead End at Old Fuel Depot

Regional Trail Program $100,000 5

4109818 Gulf Coast Parkway CR 2315 (Star

Avenue) SR 30A (US 98)

PD&E -- Complete

Construct 4 lanes 6 Design – Underway

ROW -- Funded FY 18/19


4258031 SR 22 (Wewa Highway) Business 98 Star Avenue

PD&E – Complete

Widen to 4 lanes 7 Design – Underway

Right-of-Way3

Construction3 1See Table 9 for a listing of the Bicycle/Pedestrian projects. 2 See Table 12 for a listing of the Public Transportation projects. 3 Phase NOT currently funded in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or FDOT Five Year Work Program.



FDOT Item-Segment






2178383 US 98 / SR 30A / Panama

City Beach Parkway) Mandy Lane

East of Nautilus Street

PD&E – Underway #2178382

Widen to 6 lanes 8 Design – Funded FY 18/19

Right-of-Way1

Construction1

2178384 US 98 / SR 30A / Panama

City Beach Parkway East of

Nautilus Street

East of Richard

Jackson Blvd.


Widen to 6 lanes 9 Design – Funded FY 19/20

Right-of-Way1

Construction1

2178385 US 98 / SR 30A / Panama

City Beach Parkway East of Richard Jackson Blvd.

Thomas Drive/CR 3031



Right-of-Way1

Construction1

4212252 SR 390 SR 77 US 231

PD&E – Funded FY 17/18

Widen to 6 lanes 11 Design1

Right-of-Way1

Construction1

NA CR 389 (East Avenue) CR 2312 (Baldwin

Road) SR 390

PD&E1


Right-of-Way

Construction

2179951 US 98/Thomas Drive

Interchange Phases II &III US 98 Thomas Drive

PD&E – Complete

New Interchange 13 Design – Complete

ROW1

Construction 1 Phase NOT currently funded in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or FDOT Five Year Work Program.



FDOT Item-Segment






NA Loop Road Phase 2 Bay Parkway Nautilus Street

PD&E1


Right-of-Way

Construction

NA Transmitter Road US 231 (SR 75) SR 22 (Wewa

Highway)

PD&E1


Right-of-Way

Construction

NA Star Avenue SR 22 (Wewa

Highway) US 231 (SR75)

PD&E1


Right-of-Way

Construction

4109813 Gulf to Bay Parkway US 98 (SR 30)

west of Mexico Beach

The Bay/Gulf County Line


Construct New Roadway

17 Design1

Right-of-Way

Construction

4109812 Gulf Coast Parkway US 98 (SR 30) US 231 (SR75)

PD&E – Underway


18 Design1

Right-of-Way

Construction 1 Phase NOT currently funded in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or FDOT Five Year Work Program.



FDOT Item-Segment



Funds in the 2040 LRTP - Red phases are NOT Cost

Feasible with State/Federal Funds


4244641 4244642

West Bay Parkway

US 98 (SR 30) in

Walton County

SR 79

PD&E – Underway


19 Design1

Right-of-Way

Construction

42446442 West Bay Parkway Extension SR77 SR 75 (US

231)

PD&E1


Right-of-Way

Construction

NA Multimodal Studies3 $150,000 21

NA Park and Ride Lot SR 77 SR 20 Design $50,000

22 Construction $250,000

NA Park and Ride Lot US 231 Vicinity of

Industrial Park

Design $50,000 23

Construction $250,000

4244646 SR 388

E of Northwest

Florida Beaches

International Airport

East of Burnt Mill Creek

PD&E – Complete


Right-of-Way

Construction

4244647 SR 388 East of Burnt

Mill Creek SR 77

PD&E – Complete


Right-of-Way

Construction 1 Phase NOT currently funded in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or FDOT Five Year Work Program. 2 Feasibility Study is currently underway. 3See Appendix A for Multimodal Studies.


Table 3: FY 19 - 23 Committed Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking


FDOT Item-Segment

Project Name From To Project Phases Status Improvement

2179763 US98 at 23rd Street US 98 23rd Street

PD&E – Complete

Construction of Overpass

Design – Complete

Right-of-Way – Complete


2178752

SR 390 (St Andrews

Boulevard/Beck Avenue)

SR 368 (23rd Street)

CR 2312 (Baldwin Road)

PD&E – Complete

Widen to 6 Lanes

Design – Complete

Right of Way – Underway


2178753 SR 390 (St Andrews

Boulevard)


Jenks Avenue

PD&E – Complete

Widen to 6 Lanes

Design – Complete

Right of Way – Underway


2178754 SR 390 (St. Andrews

Boulevard) Jenks Avenue SR 77

PD&E – Complete

Widen to 6 Lanes

Design – Complete

Right-of-Way – Underway


4244645 SR 388 (West Bay

Parkway) SR 79

East of Northwest Florida Beaches

International Airport

PD&E – Complete

Widen/Construct to 4 Lanes

Design – Underway

Right-of-Way – Funded FY 16/17



Table 4: FY 19 - 23 Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Project Priorities

FDOT Item-Segment

Project Name From To Improvement

Phases in Green are Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds in the 2040 LRTP - Red phases are NOT Cost Feasible with State/Federal

Funds

FY 19-23 Priority Ranking

2179104 SR 75 (US

231)2 S. of SR 30A

(US 98) South of Pipe

Line Road 6-lanes


1 Design – Underway

Right-of-Way – Funded FY 19/20 through FY 21/22

Construction

NA SR 389 (East

Avenue) Sherman Avenue


4-lanes


2 Design1

Right-of-Way

Construction

2179103 SR 75 (US 231) South of Pipe Line

Road

North of Penny Road

6-lanes


3 Design – Underway

Right-of-Way1

Construction

NA SR 75 (US 231) North of

Penny Road South of Scotts

Ferry Road 6-lanes


4 Design1

Right-of-Way1

Construction

NA SR 75 (US 231) South of

Scotts Ferry Road

SR 20 6-lanes


5 Design1

Right-of-Way1

Construction 1 Phase NOT currently funded in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or FDOT Five Year Work Program. 2Includes intersection/interchange improvements at US98/Harrison Avenue


Table 4: FY 19 - 23 Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Project Priorities

FDOT Item-Segment

Project Name From To Improvement

Phases in Green are Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds in the 2040 LRTP - Red phases are NOT Cost Feasible with State/Federal

Funds

FY 19-23 Priority Ranking

NA 23rd Street US98 (SR30) SR390 6-lanes

PD&E1

6 Design1

Right-of-Way

Construction 1 Phase NOT currently funded in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or FDOT Five Year Work Program


Table 5: FY 19 - 23 Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking

FDOT Item-Segment

Project Name From To Phases Locally Funded in 2040 LRTP Improvement

4263912

US 98A/SR 30/Front Beach

Road Segment 3

West of SR 79 West of Lullwater

Drive

Design – Complete

Transit Lanes Right-of-Way – Funded FY 18/19

Construction

4263917


Road Segment 4.1

West of Lullwater Drive

Hill Road

Design – Funded FY 17/18 & FY 18/19

Transit Lanes Right-of-Way – Funded in FY 20/21

Construction

4263913


Road Segment 4.2

Hill Road SR 392A (Hutchison

Boulevard)

Design –Funded in FY 20/21

Transit Lanes Right-of-Way

Construction

4263918


Road Segment 4.3

SR 392A (Hutchison Boulevard)

Richard Jackson Boulevard

Design – Partially Funded FY 20/21

Transit Lanes Right-of-Way

Construction

2179112 SR 79 (South Arnold Drive)


Road

US 98/SR 30A/Panama City Beach Parkway

Design – Complete

Widen to 4 Lanes

Right-of-Way – Funded FY 17/18

Construction


Table 5: FY 19 - 23 Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking

FDOT Item-Segment

Project Name From To Phases Locally Funded in 2040 LRTP Improvement

NA Alf Coleman Road US 98A/SR

30/Front Beach Road


Design

Widen to 4 Lanes

Right-of-Way

Construction

NA Hill Road US 98A/SR

30/Front Beach Road


Design

Widen to 4 Lanes

Right-of-Way

Construction

NA Powell Adams

Road


Road L.C. Hilton Jr. Drive

Design

Widen to 4 Lanes

Right-of-Way

Construction


Table 6: FY 19 - 23 Committed Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking


FDOT Item-Segment

Construction Scheduled Major Street Minor Street Improvement

2178792 FY 15/16 US 98 (Back Beach Road) SR 79 Construct additional left turn

lane east bound on US 98 (Back Beach Road)

4366901 FY 15/16

US 98 (Panama City Beach Parkway/Back Beach

Road)

23rd Street

Walton County Line to Thomas Drive

US 98 to US 231

Signal Cabinet Modification

4352551 FY 16/17 CR 389 E 26th Street Modify Intersection

4084127 FY 16/17 Traffic Management Center Upgrades

Upgrade ATMS system software from Actra to Tactics, institute

performance monitoring features, upgrade video wall,

upgrade TMC & EOC video switch, and integrate network

management software.

4084128 FY 16/17 SR 77 (Ohio Avenue) SR75 (US231) to East 9th Street

Upgrade signal systems to run adaptive phasing.

4396611 FY 18/19 SR 30A (US 98) Panama

City Beach Parkway Cauley Avenue

North bound left turn lane, add an exclusive right turn lane and

combined left turn lane/thru lane on north bound Cauley

Avenue. A raised median will be constructed on US 98 at Cauley Avenue. Sidewalks and bicycle

lanes will be added from Annabellas Drive to about 500

feet east of the intersection


Table 6: FY 19 - 23 Committed Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Project Priorities

Not Subject to Priority Ranking Construction funded in the first three years of the Transportation Improvement Program or Underway

FDOT Item-Segment

Construction Scheduled Major Street Minor Street Improvement

4367151 FY 18/19 SR 30 (US 98A/Front

Beach Road) Moylan Road

South Bound right turn from Moylan onto Front Beach Road

in addition to a West Bound right turn lane from Front Beach Road onto Moylan. Bay County

requests a left turn lane on Moylan from Back Beach Road

be included in this project.

4399621 FY 18/19 SR 392A (Hutchison

Boulevard) Clara Avenue

Signalize intersection, Fiber Optic Connect signal to system,

remove School Zone, move crosswalk to the signalized

intersection

4381381 FY 19/20 SR 75 (US 231/Harrison

Avenue) East 19th Street

Add signal backplates (completed by City)

Add South Bound right turn lane Add West Bound right turn lane

Upgrade signal hardware .


Table 7: FY 19 - 23 Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Project Priorities

Note: The TPO is actively seeking additional projects for the TSM project priority list. These projects may come from existing and future corridor studies as well as requests from the TPO or the general public. Additional corridor studies may be funded under this TSM Table.

FDOT Item-Segment

Major Street Minor Street Description Estimated Cost FY 19-23 Priority

4084123 Operations and Maintenance of the current ITS System

(Fund with TSM Funds if this project cannot be funded with Capacity Funds and fund the maintenance of the system first; LRTP Capacity Priority #1)

$500,000 1

4398921 SR 75 (US 231) Transmitter Road

1 - Construct West Bound right turn lane (Bay County requests to Construct

East Bound right turn lane instead) 2 - Extend North Bound left turn lane to

accommodate queue

$719,317 for Construction,

$204,800 for ROW 2

NA System Wide Signalized Intersection Switching

Upgrades

Upgrade signal switch systems to provide improved data feed to FDOT Regional TMC and driver info systems

$520,882 3

NA SR 30 (Business 98) CR 2337 (Sherman

Avenue) Improve Radii, Construct East Bound

Left Turn Lane With 100 Feet of Storage

$697,279 for Construction,

$1,019,800 for ROW 4

NA SR 390 (Beck Avenue) 19th Street Upgrade to Mast Arm Signalization Estimate in Progress 5

NA SR 391 (Airport Road) 19th Street 1 – Add left turn lanes

2 – Upgrade to Mast Arms Estimate in Progress 6

NA SR 30A (US 98/Tyndall

Parkway)

Ivy Road to Tyndall Air Force Base

Main Entrance

Install fiber cable from Ivy Road to main entrance of Tyndall Air Force Base

Connect Sabre Drive and Tyndall Drive to ATMS.

$468,935 for Construction, $ 0 for ROW

7


Table 8: FY 19 - 23 Committed Bicycle & Pedestrian Project Priorities

Not Subject to Priority Ranking


FDOT Item-Segment

Road Name From To Mode Recommended Facility

Type/Improvement

4391011 Minnesota Avenue1 CR 2321 (Baldwin

Road) Mosley Drive Pedestrian

Construction of Sidewalks in FY 2016/17

4098019 SR 30 (Alt. US 98) SR 79 Portside Drive Pedestrian Construction of Sidewalks in FY

2017/18

43551822 SR 30 (Front Beach

Road) Portside Drive

East Lakeshore Drive

Pedestrian Construction of Sidewalks in FY

2018/19 1 This project is funded with safety funds as recommended by the Community Traffic Safety Team. 2 Project partially transferred to Bay County.


Table 9: FY 19 - 23 Bicycle & Pedestrian Project Priorities

FDOT Item-Segment

Road Name From To Mode Recommended Facility

Type/Improvement FY 19-23 Priority

4355184

CR 30 (Front

Beach Road) East Lakeshore Drive Twin Lakes Drive Pedestrian Construction of Sidewalks 1A

4355185

CR 30 (Front

Beach Road) Twin Lakes Drive Kelly Street Pedestrian Construction of Sidewalks 1B

NA CR30 (Front

Beach Road) Kelly Street Panama City Beach

Parkway (US 98) Pedestrian Construction of Sidewalks 1C

NA Harvard

Boulevard SR 390 Issac Byrd Park Pedestrian Construction of Sidewalks 2

NA CR 3026

(Cherry Street) US98 (Tyndall

Parkway (SR 30A) SR 30 (Business 98) Pedestrian Construction of Sidewalks 3

NA CR 22/2337 (Sherman Avenue)

11th Street (CR 28) 15th Street/US 98 (SR

30A) Pedestrian Construction of Sidewalks 4

NA CR 2323 (Boat

Race Road) US98 (Tyndall

Parkway (SR 30A) Berthe Avenue (CR 2323) Pedestrian Construction of Sidewalks 5

NA 15th Street SR 30 (US 98) CR 386 Pedestrian Construction of Sidewalks/Multi-

Use Paths 6

NA Star Avenue

(CR 2315) US231 (SR 75) SR 22 (Wewa Highway) Bicycle Construction of Bicycle Lanes 7


Table 10: FY 19 - 23 Committed Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking


FDOT Item-Segment

Project Name From To Description

4098016 Thomas Drive (CR3031) Sidewalks & Bike Lanes

Thomas Drive Construction of sidewalks on the west side of Thomas Drive from Laird St to US98 for a distance of .669 miles and on Laird Street

from Thomas Drive to Joan Ave for distance of 1.75 miles in FY 16/17

Laird Street US98 (SR30)

Laird Street

Thomas Drive Joan Avenue

4355311 Bob Little Road

Sidewalk/Bicycle Path Cherry Street 7th St

Construction of a 5 foot concrete sidewalk and paved asphalt bike lane parallel to the

roadway. The sidewalk will be FDOT typical and ADA compliant. The bike lane will be

paved along the shoulder of the road. The project may require bike/ped guardrail,

construction of driveway connections, and concrete drainage inlets in FY 16/17

4229342 Merritt Brown Middle School Safe Routes to

School

Merritt Brown Road

Merritt Brown Middle School

Construct 5 foot sidewalk along the north side of road for approximately 3,400 feet. Project would also include construction of 700 feet of

sidewalk along Merritt Brown Way and Tommy Smith Drive in FY 18/19 and FY 19/20


Table 11: FY 19 - 23 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Project Priorities

FDOT Item-Segment

Project Sponsor Project Name From To Description FY 19-23 Priority

4381111 Parker Business Highway 98

Sidewalks CR 22A (Bob Little Road)

SR 30A (US 98B) Tyndall

Parkway

Construct sidewalks along Business Highway 98. The

sidewalk will be FDOT typical and ADA compliant in FY 20/21.

1

N/A Callaway Boat Race Road Sidewalk

and Bike Lane

US 98/Tyndall

Pkwy Berthe Ave

Construct a concrete sidewalk and paved asphalt bike lane parallel to the roadway. The sidewalk will be FDOT typical and ADA compliant. The bike lane will be paved along the

shoulder of the road.

2

4381061 Callaway Cherry Street Sidewalks US

98/Tyndall Parkway

S. Star Avenue

Construct sidewalks along both sides of the roadway. The

sidewalk will be FDOT typical and ADA compliant

3

N/A Callaway Wallace Road Sidewalk

and Bike Lane

US 98/Tyndall Parkway

Berthe Ave

Construct a 5 foot concrete sidewalk and paved asphalt bike

lane parallel to the roadway. The sidewalk will be FDOT

typical and ADA compliant. The bike lane will be paved along the

shoulder of the road

4

N/A Callaway Yellow Bluff Road and S. Star Avenue Sidewalks

Betty Louise Dr

S. Star Avenue

Construct a 5 foot concrete sidewalk. The sidewalk will be

FDOT typical and ADA compliant.

5

N/A Mexico Beach 15th Street Pedestrian Safety Improvements

780 feet from US 98

CR 386 Construct 7,120 Linear feet of

sidewalk and 330 Linear feet of pedestrian bridge.

6


Table 12: FY 19 - 23 Bay County Public Transportation Project Priorities by Grant

FDOT Item Segment#

Funding Source % Project Description Proposed

FY 19 2018-2019

Proposed FY 20

2019-2020

Proposed FY 21

2020-2021

Proposed FY 22

2021-2022

Proposed FY 23

2022-2023

NA

TD – Bay Trip & Equip

Local Funds

90%

10%

Provide non sponsored trips and/or capital equipment to

the trans disadv

448,087

49,787

448,087

49,787

448,087

49,787

448,087

49,787

448,087

49,787

NA TD – Bay Planning 100% Planning agency duties for

trans disadv planning related services

22,505 22,505 22,505 22,505 22,505

421719

FTA 5305

State

Local Funds

80%

10%

10%

Bay County TPO Planning grant funds

72,008

9,001

9,001

72,008

9,001

9,001

72,008

9,001

9,001

72,008

9,001

9,001

72,008

9,001

9,001

422248-3 FTA 5307

Toll Revenue Credit

80%

20%

Capital – prev. maint., replacement vehicles,

expansion, vehicles, signage, shelters, transit centers, misc.

equip, security and training

1,625,000

406,250

1,625,000

406,250

1,625,000

406,250

1,625,000

406,250

1,625,000

406,250

428209-11 FTA 5307 FLEX

Toll Revenue Credit

80%

20%

Capital – prev. maint., replacement vehicles,

expansion, vehicles, signage, shelters, transit centers, misc.

equip, security and training

350,000

87,500

350,000

87,500

350,000

87,500

350,000

87,500

350,000

87,500

422247-3 FTA 5307

Local Funds

50%

50%

Operating Assistance (Operating costs for

equipment and facilities & JARC Projects)

700,000

700,000

700,000

700,000

700,000

700,000

700,000

700,000

700,000

700,000

1Federal funds of $350,000 correspond to the Non-SIS Priority 4 in Table 2.


Table 12: FY 19 - 23 Bay County Public Transportation Project Priorities by Grant

FDOT Item Segment#

Funding Source % Project Description

Proposed FY 19

2018-2019

Proposed FY 20

2019-2020

Proposed FY 21

2020-2021

Proposed FY 22

2021-2022

Proposed FY 23

2022-2023

414281-2 FTA 5339

Toll Revenue Credit

80%

20%

Capital – bus and bus related facilities

425,546

106,386

425,546

106,386

425,546

106,386

425,546

106,386

425,546

106,386

433509-1

FTA 5310

State

Local Funds

80%

10%

10%

Capital – Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals

with Disabilities

166,815

20,852

20,852

166,815

20,852

20,852

166,815

20,852

20,852

166,815

20,852

20,852

166,815

20,852

20,852

433509-2 FTA 5310

Local Funds

50%

50%

Operating – Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and

Individuals with Disabilities service

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

422246-1 FDOT Block Grant

Local Funds

50%

50%

Operating Assistance – Block Grant

482,265

482,265

482,265

482,265

482,265

482,265

482,265

482,265

482,265

482,265

421367-2 FDOT 5311

Local Funds

50%

50% Operating - Rural Assistance

127,000

127,000

127,000

127,000

127,000

127,000

127,000

127,000

127,000

127,000

422249-1 FDOT 100% Urban Corridor 189,000 189,000 189,000 189,000 189,000


Table 13: FY 19 - 23 Aviation Project Priorities – Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport

2019

Priority FDOT Item-Segment Project Description FAA

Funding State

Funding Local

Funding Total Cost

Estimated Funding

1 N/A Perform Master Plan 450,000 25,000 25,000 500,000

2 N/A Runway/Taxiway

Improvements 900,000 25,000 75,000 1,000,000

3 N/A Runway

Extension/Overlay 2,700,000 150,000 150,000 3,000,000

4 N/A Screening Checkpoint -

DESIGN 310,262 17,237 398,261 725,760

5 N/A CBP International Facility 926,415 514,675 617,610 2,058,700

6 N/A Crosswind Runway

Construction – Phase I 4,214,700 9,042,650 9,042,650 22,300,000



2020


Funding State

Funding Local

Funding Total Cost

Estimated Funding

1 N/A Screening Checkpoint -

CONSTRUCTION 3,137,098 174,283 4,026,859 7,338,240

2 N/A Cell Phone Lot Expansion –

Design & Construction 0 108,000 108,000 216,000

3 N/A OB Baggage Expansion -

DESIGN 0 270,000 270,000 540,000

4 N/A Design North Concourse

Expansion 886,688 89,130 820,082 1,795,900

5 N/A Construct Duel West Parallel

TXY 4,437,000 246,500 246,500 4,930,000

6 N/A Crosswind Runway

Construction Phase II 4,214,700 9,042,650 9,042,650 22,300,000

2021


Funding State

Funding Local

Funding Total Cost

Estimated Funding

1 N/A ARFF Vehicle 720,000 40,000 40,000 800,000

2 N/A OB Baggage Expansion -

Construction 2,653,560 2,653,560 5,307,120

3 N/A Expand AP Maintenance

Facility 888,000 888,000

4 N/A North Concourse

Construction Phase I 2,122,848 511,056 5,228,496 7,862,400



2022


Funding State

Funding Local

Funding Total Cost

Estimated Funding

1 N/A Commercial Apron Expansion 3,154,320 175,240 175,240 3,504,800

2 N/A Vehicle Parking Expansion –

Phase I - DESIGN 0 89,050 184,950 274,000

3 N/A Upgrade Airport Security

System 900,000 50,000 50,000 1,000,000

2023


Funding State

Funding Local

Funding Total Cost

Estimated Funding

1 N/A Environmental Assessment

Continuing 450,000 25,000 25,000 500,000

2 N/A Vehicle Parking Expansion –

Phase I - CONSTRUCTION 0 900,575 1,870,425 2,771,000

3 N/A Rehabilitate Vehicle Access

Road 0 1,037,500 1,037,500 2,075,000


Table 14: FY 19 - 23 Seaport Project Priorities – Port Panama City

2019

Priority # Program Description Local State Total

1 TBD Replace East Avenue Bridge 1,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000

2 TBD East Terminal Improvements 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000

3 TBD Expand Bulk Transfer Facility 250,000 250,000 500,000

4 TBD Dredge West 3 1,350,000 1,350,000 2,700,000

5 TBD Extend Road & Rail at IDC 250,000 250,000 500,000

2020


1 TBD Expand East Terminal Berth 4,000,000 4,000,000 8,000,000


3 TBD Expand Bulk Storage 5,000,000 5,000,000 10,000,000

2021 Priority # Program Description Local State Total

1 TBD Refrigerated Warehouse 3,000,000 3,000,000 6,000,000

2 TBD Racks for Refrigerated Containers 750,000 750,000 1,500,000

2022


1 TBD Mobile Harbor Crane 2,500,000 2,500,000 5,000,000

2 TBD Container Handling Equipment 600,000 600,000 1,200,000


Table 14: FY 19 - 23 Seaport Project Priorities – Port Panama City 2023


1 TBD Container Yard Expansion 750,000 750,000 1,500,000


3 TBD Bulkhead/Berth Capacity Improvements 250,000 250,000 500,000

Appendix A – Multi Modal Studies

A-1

FY 19 - 23 Multi Modal Studies

Project Description Project Name From To

$150,000 Annually for Multi Modal Studies

SR 77 Baldwin Road 3rd Street

US 98 (15th Street) 23rd Street East Bay Bridge

23rd Street SR 390 US 231

Appendix B – Evaluation Criteria

B-1

2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN EVALUATION CRITERIA

Category and Criteria (Description)

Criteria Rating Scale (Lesser Benefit <----> Higher

Benefit)

Economic Vitality - 15% (Goal 6) (Objectives 6.1, 6.4, and 6.5) Economic Reach (Positive Employment Growth from 2010 to 2040 Trafffic Analysis Zones along Corridor) 0 0.5 1 To what extent will the project support planned development or provide economic benefits (e.g. job growth/retention)? No >0 to 2% >2% Base Access (Project on the SIS for Military Access or the Strategic Highway Network (STRAHNET)) 0 1 Does the project improve military base access directly or indirectly (e.g., along a connecting route)? No Yes Intermodal Goods Movement (Project on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) or TPO 's Regional Freight Plan Network) 0 1 To what extent will the project enhance, expand, or benefit intermodal facilities or opportunities for goods movement? No Yes

Multimodal Transportation Safety - 20% (Goal 2) (Objectives 2.1, 2.3, and 6.5) School Activity (Project within two miles of a public school, private school, or College) 0 1 Will the project help to improve a school zone or school-related activities (e.g., school crossings, school routes, buses, etc.) No Yes Safety Improvement Strategies (Accident rates based on Signal Four Analytics) 0 0.5 1 Projects ranked from highest to lowest and awarded a graduated point value based on ranking past five years Lowest Mid-Range Highest

Identified by Community Traffic Safety Team (Project on the Bay County Community Traffic Safety Team List of Projects) 0 0.5 1

Has the project been identified as a Community Traffic Safety Team Project? No < 1 Year 1 Year

or >

B-2

Multimodal Transportation Security - 10% (Goal 7) (Objectives 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3) Emergency Response (Project on a hurricane evacuation route in the Northwest Florida Hurricane Evacuation Restudy) 0 1 Will the project directly enhance emergency response or improve emergency access for police, fire, ambulance, major utility center, etc? No Yes Identified Security Issues (Project is within 2 miles of military installation, airport, port, and local government center) 0 1 Will the project help to address a previously-identified security issue or concern? None Yes Service Disruption (Project is within 5 miles of a hurricane evacuation route from the Hurricane Restudy above) 0 1 Does the proposed project provide alternative routes for natural disaster evacuation? No Yes

Congestion Management - 20% (Goal 8) (Objective 8.1) Correct Deficiency (Project is deficient in the Existing Plus Committed Network) 0 0.5 1 Will the project appropriately address congestion as identified by studies or other observations? <1.0 1.0 to 1.3 >1.3 Congestion Management Strategies (Volume to Capacity Ratio from the 2040 Needs Plan Network) 0 0.5 1 To what extent will the project incorporate congestion management strategies? >1.3 1.0 to 1.3 <1.0 Facility Level of Service (LOS) (Regional Transportation Model and TPO's LOS Tables for 2010) 0 0.5 1 What is the LOS of the proposed project area? A-B C-D Failing

Multimodal Choices and Connections - 15% (Goal 1)(Objectives 1.1 and 1.2) Pedestrian (Project included as a Pedestrian project in the TPO's Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan as amended on Sept. 25, 2013) 0 0.5 1

To what extent will the project enhance pedestrian and related connections or opportunities? >2 miles within 2

miles Same facility

Bicycle (Project included as a bicycle project in the TPO's Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan as amended on Sept. 25, 2013) 0 0.5 1

To what extent will the project enhance bicycle and related connections or opportunities? >2miles within 2

miles same

facility Public Transportation (Project is located on a Bay Towne Trolley Route or a FDOT Park and Ride Lot) 0 0.5 1 To what extent will the project enhance public transportation and related connections or opportunities (e.g., park&ride, bus shelters)? >2miles

within 2 miles

Same facility

B-3

System Efficiency and Preservation - 10% (Goal 3 ) (Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5) AADT (2010 FDOT or 2010 Local Government Traffic Counts) 0 0.5 1

What is the estimated daily traffic volume at the project location? 0 to <10,000 10,000 to

20,000 >20,000 Route Significance (Project is on the Strategic Intermodal System or National Highway System) 0 1 Is the project located on the National Highway System or FIHS? No Yes Existing Deficiency (Regional Transportation Model and TPO's LOS Tables for 2010 or other LOS Analysis) 0 0.5 1 Will the project address one or more deficiencies (e.g., failing LOS, ADA, signal delay, resurfacing, etc.)? <1.0 1.0 to 1.3 >1.3

System Sustainability and Livability - 10% (Goals 4&5) (Objectives 4.1, 4.3, 4.6, 5.1,5.5, and 5.7) Environmental (PD&E Study and/or FDOT Consultant ETDM Review) 0 0.5 1 Does the project have impacts or no impacts? No impacts Moderate Low Recreational Opportunity (Project is linked to water, campgrounds, parks, and trails) 0 1 To what extent might the project add, enhance, or otherwise benefit recreational opportunities for residents or visitors? >2miles

0 to 2 miles

Local Planning (Project is located in a Local Government Comprehensive Plan or Master Plan) 0 1 Is the project identified or supported by an existing municipal comprehensive plan or other locally-adopted plan or study? No Yes

Economic Vitality 3*15 45

Multimodal Transportation Safety 3*20 60

Multimodal Transportation Security 3*10 30

Congestion Management 3*20 60

Multimodal Choices and Connections 3*15 45

System Efficiency and Preservation 3*10 30

System Sustainability and Livability 3*10 30

Maximum points one project can have 300

Bay County TPO has final authority to select the projects for inclusion in the Cost Feasible Plan and to rank them in the Project Priorities.

B-4

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (TSM) CRITERIA

A. Level of Service (LOS) Issue Addressed

Current Deficiency 5 Points Five Year Deficiency 3 Points Ten Year Deficiency 1 Point Not deficient 0 Points

B. Regional Significant Roadway (defined as a roadway that is included in the model for the metropolitan area’s transportation network) Yes 2 Points No 1 Point C. Crash Rate Safety Ratio Greater than 2.00 3 Points Safety Ratio from 1.00 to 2.00 2 Points Safety Ratio less than 1.00 1 Point D. Has an existing TPO priority Yes 2 Points No 1 Point E. Significant Freight Corridor Designated NHS Intermodal Connector or Truck

Traffic more than 10% Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) 3 Points Truck Traffic 8-10% AADT 2 Points Truck Traffic 5-7.99% AADT 1 Point

F. Local Project Support Wide Support = Resolutions of support from 2 local governments

+ 2 letters of support from community organizations 5 Points Moderate Support = Resolutions of support from 2 local government or 1 local government resolution + 1 letter of support from community organization 4 Points No demonstrated support beyond 1 local government sponsor resolution 3 Points

B-5

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) PROJECT CRITERIA

Evaluation Category

Scoring

(Maximum

Points Possible)

Project

Score

Criterion 1

Safety

25

Criterion 2

Connectivity

15

Criterion 3

Location Efficiency

10

Criterion 4

Public Support

15

Criterion 5

Proximity to School

15

Criterion 6

Design Quality

10

Criterion 7

Environmental/Archaeological

Projects/ Historic Preservation

10

Total

100

Bonus Points

Age of Project 1 point per year, capped at 5 years

5

Total Points Possible

105

.

B-6

BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PLAN PROJECT PRIORITY CRITERIA

A Benefit-Cost Index was calculated for all segments except those identified either as having an existing facility or as meeting the target level of service;

these segments were filtered out of the prioritization process to help focus improvements where they are most needed. TPO staff, with input from the

Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee and the consulting team, established a benefit weighting system of 40% for existing conditions, 40% for potential

demand, and 20% for public input/prior plans. Accordingly, the Benefit-Cost Index equation is (0.4*LOS + 0.4*Demand + 0.2*Input/Plans) / Cost per Mile.

These results were then multiplied by 1,000 to convert them to a more reasonable scale.

Please note: The TPO did not agree with the Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan Criteria rankings and worked with the TPO staff to develop a new ranking of projects based upon the rankings by a Bicycle/Pedestrian Committee comprised of members of the TPO's Technical Coordinating Committee and the Citizens' Advisory Committee. These rankings are identified in Table 9 of this report.

Appendix C – Public Comments

C-1

COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC WORKSHOPS

May 1, 2017

May 1, 2017 Lynn Have City Hall

1. Non-SIS Priority #12 “Panama City Beach Parkway from East of Richard Jackson Boulevard to Thomas Drive.” FDOT is funding the Design

in house and it did not appear in the Work Program. The Project ID Number should be changed to 2178385 from 2178382.

The Project ID Number has been changed to 2178385. The status of the Design Phase has been updated to reflect it is underway.

2. Non SIS Priority#14 “CR 389 (East Avenue) from Baldwin Road to SR 390.” What is the reason this project does not extend to SR 77?

The 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan did not show a need to extend this project from SR 390 to SR 77. Therefore, it was not considered for the

2040 Long Range Transportation Cost Feasible Plan. The project priorities are based on the TPO’s 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Cost Feasible

Plan.

3. TSM Priority #4, Beck Avenue 19th Street Mast Arm Signalization. Will this project interfere with the multi-use path along this corridor?

There is no multi-use path that is planned along this corridor. However, there are two multi-use paths projects that were completed in early 2017 but

are not along this corridor. These two projects are Airport Road from US 231 to Harrison Avenue and Harrison Avenue from Airport Road to 19th Street.

In addition, a segment north of this segment (SR 390 six laning from 23rd Street to Baldwin Road) is planned to have bicycle lanes and sidewalks.

4. TAP Project Priority #6 from last year the Lynn Haven Sidewalk Project is not shown on the FY 2019-2023 Project Priorities. What is the

reason for this emission?

The TPO Staff did not receive a TAP resubmittal package in 2017 for the Lynn Haven Sidewalk Project. Therefore, it was not subjected to the 2017

TAP ranking criteria. Only the TAP projects that were ranked with the 2017 TAP Criteria were considered for the FY 2019-2023 Project Priorities.

May 1, 2017 Gulf Coast State College

1. Who staff’s the Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST)?

The Florida Department of Transportation District III staff’s the CTST. Members from Law Enforcement, local government, and the TPO staff usually

attend the CTST meetings in Bay County. Projects are funded with safety funds and are usually bicycle/pedestrian related projects.

2. What is the status of the Transit Committee?

A separate Transit Committee has not been approved by the TPO.

C-2

3. How are the Panama City Beach Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Projects funded and how are the CRA projects different from

the TPO’s roadway capacity projects?

The Panama City Beach CRA projects are funded by the City of Panama City Beach and are capacity and multimodal projects. The TPO capacity

projects are normally funded by state and federal funds. However, Bay County has funded capacity improvements on county facilities such as

Baldwin Road and the City of Panama City has funded capacity improvements on city facilities such as Jenks Avenue.

C-3

COMMENTS FROM TPO AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES WORKSHOP

MAY 22, 2017

1. Table 1 – Non-SIS Committed. Remove the Loop Road project. The project is complete.

Change has been made.

2. Table 2 – Non-SIS. Priority 3, Public Transportation Capital Improvements. When was the dollar amount raised to $350,000?

The $350,000 for Public Transportation Capital Improvements occurred during the public involvement portion of the 2040 Long Range Transportation

Plan Cost Feasible Plan and was included in the adoption of the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Cost Feasible Plan.

3. Table 2 – Non-SIS. Priorities. Bay County Representatives indicated they will be e-mailing a recommended priority list for these projects.

The recommended Non-SIS Priorities were received by e-mail from the Bay County Staff on June 2, 2017.

4. Table 4 – SIS. Priority 5. East Avenue. It was recommended to move this project to Priority 2 and the corresponding projects moved down

on the list.

The movement of priorities needs to be approved by the TPO. The recommendation will be presented at the June TPO meeting for information with

approval of the Project Priorities at the July TPO meeting.

5. Table 7 – TSM. Priority 6. SR 30A (US 98 Tyndall Parkway). It was recommended to move this project to Priority 3 and the corresponding

projects moved down on the list.

The movement of priorities needs to be approved by the TPO. The recommendation will be presented at the June TPO meeting for information with

approval of the Project Priorities at the July TPO meeting.

6. Tables 9 and 11 – Boat Race Road. It was mentioned that this project is Priority 6 on the Bicycle/Pedestrian Project Priorities and Priority

1 on the TAP Project Priorities.

A project can occur on both lists. Once a project is funded and the funding source identified, it will be removed from the priority list that is not associated

with the funding source.

C-4

COMMENTS FROM TPO AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES WORKSHOP

JUNE 29, 2017

1. Table 2 – Non-SIS.

a. Switch Priorities 3 (Public Transportation) and 4 (Transportation System Management).

b. Move Priorities 6 (Park Ride Lot at SR 77 and SR 20) and 7 (Park and Ride Lot at US 231 and Vicinity of Industrial Park) to Priorities

22 and 23.

c. Switch Priorities 18 (West Bay Parkway Extension from SR 77 to SR 75 (US 231) and 22 (Loop Road Phase 2 from Loop Road Phase

1 to Nautilus Street).

d. Move Priorities 16 (SR 388 from E of Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport to East of Burnt Mill Creek) and 17 (SR 388

from East of Burnt Mill Creek to SR 77) to Priorities 24 and 25.

The movement of priorities needs to be approved by the TPO.

2. Table 2 – Non-SIS and Table 4 SIS. It was recommended the phase that is requested to be funded be highlighted in yellow.


3. Table 4 – SIS. Priority 5. East Avenue from Sherman Avenue to SR 2312 (Baldwin Road). It was recommended to move this project to

Priority 2 and the corresponding projects moved down on the list.


4. Table 7 – TSM. It was recommended to include the new project “Signalized Intersection Switching Upgrades” to Priority 3 and the

corresponding projects moved down on the list.


5. Table 10 – Committed TAP. It was requested to remove the Jenks Avenue from Baldwin Road to SR 390 since it will be included in the TRIP

widening project from Baldwin Road to SR 390.

This project has been removed from the Project Priorities List.

6. Table 11 – TAP. Add SR 30 (US 98B) from CR 22A Bob Little Road to SR 30A (US 98) Tyndall Parkway as Priority 1 and the corresponding

projects moved down on the list since Construction is funded in FY 2020/21.


C-5

7. Table 11 – TAP. SR 30 (US 98B) from Morris Drive to Municipal Park Entrance. Needs to be included on the Project Priority List since the

project is funded.

Change has not been made. Project is only scheduled for Design in FY 2020/21. The Transportation Alternatives Program Projects need to be

resubmitted annually to remain on the TPO’s Project Priority List until the project is funded for construction in the five-year work program.

8. Table 15 – Congestion Mitigation Air Quality. A discussion occurred on what was meant by conversion of fleets within the TPO region to

alternative fuels.

It was stated that currently the Bay County TPO is in attainment for air quality and FDOT receives funding for air quality and uses these funds for

intersection improvements to maintain air quality attainment. The TPO in Jacksonville, Florida has requested FDOT, through their Project Priorities,

to use these funds for conversion of fleets to alternative fuels. This project priority is for the same request in the Bay County TPO region.

Appendix D – Resolution Bay 17-09

D-1

Documents

FY 2019 - FY 2023 Bay County TPO Project Priorities · FY 2019 - FY 2023 Bay County TPO Project Priorities Prepared for Bay County Transportation Planning Organization; ... 23 Bicycle