FY 2015-2016 CAPITAL BUDGET - Nancy On Norwalk€¦ · FY 2015-2016 CAPITAL BUDGET DEPARTMENT 2014-15 Project # Department Priority. Project Description Council Department Finance

FY 2015-2016

CAPITAL BUDGET

DEPARTMENT 2014-15

Project # Department Priority. Project DescriptionCouncil Department Finance Department Finance Department Finance Department Finance Department Finance

Approved Request Recommend Request Recommend Request Recommend Request Recommend Request Recommend

A. POLICE

1. Tactical Vests 38,000 38,000

2. Mobile Commad Vehicle 119,000 119,000

09153010- Building Access FOB system 75,000

C0540

Hypalon Tubes for inflatable boat

SUBTOTAL - POLICE DEPARTMENT $75,000 $38,000 $38,000 $119,000 $119,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

COMBINED DISPATCH

1. Radio Communication Upgrade 220,000 220,000

09153610- Radio Receiver Relocation 80,000

C0541

SUBTOTAL - COMBINED DISPATCH $80,000 $220,000 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

B. FIRE

1. Vehicle Replacement 95,000 95,000

09153110- 2. Various Stations: Repairs & Replacements 30,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000

C0412

3. Fire Station Paving 120,000 120,000

09153110- 4. Apparatus Replacement 550,000 550,000 550,000 100,000 100,000 1,000,000 1,000,000

C0437

C0343 5. 100 Fairfield Ave (Mx) Building Repairs 475,000 475,000

C0310 6. SCBA Replacement 280,000 280,000

7. New Station #6 3,000,000 300,000 2,500,000

New Canaan (Stn#2) Renovations

09153110- Removal of Underground Storage Tanks 35,000

C0542

SUBTOTAL - FIRE DEPARTMENT $615,000 $250,000 $250,000 $585,000 $585,000 $790,000 $790,000 $3,135,000 $435,000 $1,035,000 $3,535,000

C. PUBLIC WORKS

09157100- A-1. City Hall Repairs & Improvements 730,000 914,000 706,000 530,000 738,000 265,000 265,000 300,000 300,000 203,000 203,000

C0439

09157100- A-2. Various City Bldgs - General Capital Repairs 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000

C0476

09157100- A-3. Nathaniel Ely 145,000 160,000 160,000 35,000 35,000 750,000 750,000

C0266

09157100- A-4. Public Works Center - Repairs/Improvements 105,000 218,000 218,000 250,000 250,000

C0119

09157100- A-5. Energy Conservation Various Locations 25,000 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000

C0149

09157100- A-6. Police Headquarters 20,000 49,000 49,000

C0137

09157100- A-7. Lockwood House 30,000 80,000 80,000

C0325

09157100- A-8. Ben Franklin 77,000 48,000 48,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 167,000 167,000

C0295

09157100- A-9. Main Library 100,000 42,000 42,000 535,000 535,000 105,000 105,000 16,000 16,000

C0133

A-10. Life Safety-Various Buildings 15,000 0

2015-2016 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20

Page 1 of 6

FY 2015-2016

CAPITAL BUDGET

DEPARTMENT 2014-15



2015-2016 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20

09157100- A-11. Various Bldgs - Environmental Remediation 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000

C0543

BUILDING MANAGEMENT SUBTOTAL $1,302,000 $1,626,000 $1,403,000 $1,610,000 $1,818,000 $1,380,000 $1,380,000 $578,000 $578,000 $298,000 $298,000

09154021- B-1. Perry Avenue Bridge Over Norwalk River 190,000 296,000 296,000

C0392

C0526 B-2. Glover Avenue Bridge Improvements 250,000 0 1,000,000 0 250,000 1,000,000

B-3. Perry Avenue Bridge over Silvermine (pointing) 30,000 0 300,000 0 30,000 300,000

C0496 B-4. James Street Bridge over Silvermine

C0315 B-5. General Bridge & Retaining Wall Repairs 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000

C0471 B-6. East Avenue Roadway/Bridge

BRIDGES SUBTOTAL $190,000 $576,000 $296,000 $1,365,000 $65,000 $0 $30,000 $65,000 $615,000 $0 $1,000,000

09154031- C-1. Fleet Replacement 805,000 770,000 330,000 790,000 790,000 966,000 966,000 883,000 883,000 440,000 440,000

C0313

FLEET SUBTOTAL $805,000 $770,000 $330,000 $790,000 $790,000 $966,000 $966,000 $883,000 $883,000 $440,000 $440,000

D-1. Drainage System Mapping 60,000 0 60,000 0 60,000 0 60,000 0 60,000 0

MAPPING SUBTOTAL $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000 $0

09154021- E-1. Pavement Management Program 5,000,000 6,000,000 5,500,000 6,000,000 5,500,000 6,000,000 5,500,000 6,000,000 5,500,000 6,000,000 6,000,000

C0021

E-2. City Hall Parking Facilities 250,000 0 250,000

C0407 E-3. Norwalk River Valley Trail 750,000 600,000 1,500,000 0

09154021- E-4. Washington Street - Water to MLK 200,000

C0405

PAVEMENT PROGRAMS SUBTOTAL $5,200,000 $7,000,000 $6,100,000 $6,000,000 $5,750,000 $6,000,000 $5,500,000 $6,000,000 $5,500,000 $7,500,000 $6,000,000

F-1. Sidewalks and Curbing - Road Paving 500,000 0 500,000 0 500,000 0 500,000 0 500,000 0

C0318 F-2. Sidewalks & Curbing - Citywide 500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 600,000 1,000,000 600,000 1,000,000 700,000 1,000,000 700,000

C0503 F-3. Footpath Replacement 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000

C0349 F-4. Sidewalk and Curb - City Bldgs & Property 28,000 28,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000

SIDEWALKS SUBTOTAL $500,000 $1,628,000 $1,128,000 $1,600,000 $700,000 $1,650,000 $750,000 $1,600,000 $800,000 $1,650,000 $850,000

C0302 G-1. General Drainage 250,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 250,000

G-2 Honeysuckle-Daphne Diversion 350,000 0 1,000,000 0

C0440 G-2. Watercourse Maintenance 1,500,000 0 1,000,000 250,000 1,000,000 250,000 1,000,000 250,000 250,000

C0425 G-7. Stormwater Management Plan 500,000 100,000 200,000 100,000 200,000 100,000 200,000 100,000 100,000

G-5. Water Street Outlet Maintenance 300,000 300,000 0 300,000 300,000

C0395 G-3. Keeler Brook Drainage Area 4,000,000 0 2,000,000 2,000,000

G-4. Culvert Rehabilitation 400,000 400,000

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SUBTOTAL $250,000 $2,850,000 $350,000 $3,000,000 $900,000 $6,100,000 $1,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,900,000 $500,000 $600,000

C0232 H-1. Traffic Signals at Various Locations 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000

Page 2 of 6

FY 2015-2016

CAPITAL BUDGET

DEPARTMENT 2014-15



2015-2016 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20

H-2. Striping and Signing (incl. bike lanes) 300,000 150,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000

H-3. Incident Management System 250,000 0 750,000 0 750,000 0 100,000 0 100,000 0

09154031- H-4. Transportation Master Plan Implementation 200,000 1,320,000 400,000 1,800,000 400,000 500,000 400,000 500,000 400,000

CO514

C0528 Traffic System Enhancements

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SUBTOTAL $200,000 $800,000 $400,000 $2,320,000 $800,000 $3,000,000 $850,000 $850,000 $650,000 $800,000 $600,000

09154031- I-1. Tree Planting General 50,000 60,000 50,000 60,000 50,000 60,000 50,000 60,000 50,000 60,000 50,000

C0233

TREE PLANTING SUBTOTAL $50,000 $60,000 $50,000 $60,000 $50,000 $60,000 $50,000 $60,000 $50,000 $60,000 $50,000

CO234 J-1. FHWA Matching Funds 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000

C0441 J-2. Safe Routes to Schools 200,000 200,000

SAFETEALU MATCH SUBTOTAL $0 $0 $0 $450,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0

C0515 K-1. Transfer Station-Compactor Replacement 276,000 140,000 140,000

K-2. Document Management System

PUBLIC WORKS OTHER SUBTOTAL $276,000 $140,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

SUBTOTAL - PUBLIC WORKS $8,773,000 $15,510,000 $10,197,000 $17,255,000 $11,323,000 $19,216,000 $10,526,000 $14,346,000 $12,226,000 $11,308,000 $9,838,000

D. PARKING AUTHORITY

C0303 1. Parking Facilities 747,000 747,000 747,000 747,000 747,000 747,000 747,000 747,000

C0465 2 Revenue Control (smart parking) 200,000 200,000 300,000 300,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

SUBTOTAL - PARKING AUTHORITY $0 $0 $0 $947,000 $947,000 $1,047,000 $1,047,000 $897,000 $897,000 $897,000 $897,000

E. WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY

1. WWTP Main Lift Pump Replacement 3,000,000 3,000,000

2. Ely Ave/Bouton Str. Hydraulic Repair 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000

09154062- 3. Supplemental Treatment Upgrade 500,000 2,000,000 2,000,000

C0544

09154062- 4. Solids Handling Facility 200,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000

C0545

5. Keeler Brook Pump Station Upgrade 2,000,000 2,000,000

09154062- 6. Collection System Rehabilitation 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000

C0361

09154062- Pump Station Upgrade/Replacement 250,000

C0360

SUBTOTAL - WPCA $1,950,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $7,000,000 $7,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000

F. BOARD OF EDUCATION

1. Norwalk Early Childhood Center (Phase 2) 557,000 557,000

2. District Building Management System (BMS) 1,000,000 500,000 500,000

09155010- 3. District Technology 521,000 1,033,000 750,000 1,033,000 750,000 1,033,000 750,000 1,033,000 750,000 1,033,000 750,000

C0112 . .

4. West Rocks MS Window Replacement 800,000 75,000 725,000

Page 3 of 6

FY 2015-2016

CAPITAL BUDGET

DEPARTMENT 2014-15



2015-2016 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20

09155010- 5. District Paving & Concrete 100,000 535,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 280,000 0 315,000 315,000 500,000 500,000

C0516

6. District Fire Alarm System 500,000 50,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 500,000

TBD 7. Jefferson Elementary School Construction 358,000 358,000 7,949,000 7,949,000

TBD 8. Cranbury Elementary School Construction 256,000 256,000 5,757,000 5,757,000

District Common Core State Standards 2,358,000

C0538

Enhancement to School Security 1,725,000

C0537

Rowayton Elementary School Construction 780,000

C0519

TBD District Gymnasium Equipment

TBD District Stage Rigging & Curtains

TBD Columbus Elementary School Construction

SUBTOTAL - BOARD OF EDUCATION $5,484,000 $4,425,000 $2,282,000 $2,241,000 $3,183,000 $10,018,000 $9,205,000 $7,605,000 $7,322,000 $1,533,000 $1,250,000

G. RECREATION & PARKS

09156030- 1. Vehicles 194,000 188,000 188,000 70,000 70,000 45,000 45,000

C0486

09156030- 2. Veterans Memorial Park 75,000 1,600,000 800,000 1,660,000 800,000C0367

3. Brien McMahon Replace/Refurb. Turf Fields 1,620,000 500,000TBD

09156030- 4. Cranbury Park/Gallaher Estate 550,000 350,000 350,000 1,600,000 300,000 900,000 300,000 400,000 300,000 400,000 300,000C0366

09156030- 5. Backstop & Fencing Improvements 35,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000C0131

09156030- 6. Basketball & Tennis Courts 54,000 165,000 100,000 70,000 70,000 100,000 100,000C0321

09156030- 7. School & Park Playgrounds 150,000 90,000 90,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000C0364

09156030- 8. Fodor Farm 100,000 40,000 0C0462

09156030- 9. Tree Planting 40,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000C0370

09156030- 10. Open Space Fund 52,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000C0372

11. Rowayton Community Docks 50,000 0 400,000 0 50,000 400,000TBD

12. Park Lighting Energy Savings 65,000 0 65,000TBD

13. Parks Garage Paving of Lot 60,000 0 60,000 0TBD

14. Oyster Shell Park 250,000 0 750,000 0 750,000 0 750,000 0 750,000 0TBD

15. Master Plan of Parks 150,000 150,000TBD

09156030- Nathan Hale Athletic Complex 2,000,000C0518

09156030- Mathews Park 90,000C0546

09156030- Calf Pasture Beach 100,000C0365

09156030- Flax Hill Park 50,000C0364

SUBTOTAL - RECREATION AND PARKS $3,490,000 $4,613,000 $2,163,000 $4,935,000 $1,625,000 $2,030,000 $740,000 $1,265,000 $465,000 $1,265,000 $880,000

Page 4 of 6

FY 2015-2016

CAPITAL BUDGET

DEPARTMENT 2014-15



2015-2016 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20

H. LIBRARY

09156210- 1. Library Auditoriums 25,000 18,000 18,000C0553

2. Children's Rooms Renovation 23,000 23,000 26,000 26,000 45,000 45,000 44,000 44,000 65,000 65,000

09156210- 3. Norwalk Newspaper Digitization 11,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 22,000 22,000C0548

4. RFID Conversion & Implementation 0 152,000 0 16,000 0

09156210- Integrated Library System 50,000C0547

SUBTOTAL - LIBRARY $86,000 $62,000 $62,000 $199,000 $47,000 $82,000 $66,000 $65,000 $65,000 $87,000 $87,000

I. HISTORICAL COMMISSION

C0501 1. Mathews Park Buildings 0 40,000 40,000 15,000 15,000 50,000 50,000 175,000 175,000

09156310- 2. LMMM Roof Leak Repair 150,000 216,000 216,000C0186

09156310- 3. Mill Hill Master Plan-ADA Access 100,000 94,000 94,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000C0521

09156310- 4. Lockwood House Museum ADA Access 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000C0549

09156310- 5. WPA Murals 12,000 25,000 25,000 15,000 15,000C0550

C0294 6. Cemetery Conservation/Restoration 0 40,000 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 60,000 60,000

C0186 7. LMMM Improvement Project 25,000 25,000 60,000 60,000 225,000 25,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 150,000

C0430 8. Barn/Smith Street Buildings 10,000 0 100,000 10,000 0 0 20,000 0 0 0

C0294 9. Cemetery Site Work 0 10,000 10,000 0 0 10,000 10,000 0 0 10,000 10,000

C0374 10. Mill Hill Buildings 225,000 150,000 75,000

C0533 11. Museum Collection Archive/Cataloguing 10,000 0 10,000 0

SUBTOTAL - HISTORICAL COMMISSION $312,000 $560,000 $510,000 $660,000 $525,000 $440,000 $315,000 $440,000 $460,000 $435,000 $335,000

J. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

1. Choice Neiborhoods District 1,300,000 1,300,000 500,000 500,000

C0535 2. Public Art Fund 25,000 25,000

09150910- Affordable Housing 250,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 250,000C0288

09150910- Transit Oriented Development 350,000 1,200,000 500,000 1,000,000 500,000 1,000,000 500,000 1,000,000 500,000C0451

09150910- Head of the Harbor 350,000C0551

Bikeway Planning & Construction 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000

Façade Improvements 0 160,000 150,000 160,000 150,000 160,000 150,000 160,000 150,000

C0534 North Water Street Lighting 0 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000

SUBTOTAL - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY $950,000 $1,325,000 $1,325,000 $2,610,000 $1,650,000 $2,110,000 $1,350,000 $2,110,000 $1,350,000 $1,910,000 $1,150,000

K. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

09150600- 1. Citywide IT Projects 374,000 647,000 452,000 254,000 254,000 246,000 246,000 195,000 195,000 232,000 232,000

C0375

2. Citywide GIS Technology Projects 13,000 13,000 117,000 117,000 254,000 254,000

Page 5 of 6

FY 2015-2016

CAPITAL BUDGET

DEPARTMENT 2014-15



2015-2016 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20

SUBTOTAL - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $374,000 $660,000 $465,000 $371,000 $371,000 $500,000 $500,000 $195,000 $195,000 $232,000 $232,000

L. HEALTH

1. Oil Tank and Trailer 30,000 0

09152012- Security System Replacement 18,000

C0552

SUBTOTAL - HEALTH $18,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

M. HUMAN RELATIONS AND FAIR RENT

C0536 1. ADA Compliance 250,000 345,000 250,000 350,000 250,000 350,000 250,000 350,000 250,000 350,000 250,000

SUBTOTAL - HR & FAIR RENT $250,000 $345,000 $250,000 $350,000 $250,000 $350,000 $250,000 $350,000 $250,000 $350,000 $250,000

GRAND TOTAL $22,457,000 $32,038,000 $21,762,000 $37,272,000 $27,625,000 $40,583,000 $28,789,000 $33,408,000 $26,665,000 $20,052,000 $19,454,000

DEPARTMENT SUMMARY

POLICE DEPARTMENT 75,000 38,000 38,000 119,000 119,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

COMBINED DISPATCH 80,000 220,000 220,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FIRE DEPARTMENT 615,000 250,000 250,000 585,000 585,000 790,000 790,000 3,135,000 435,000 1,035,000 3,535,000

PUBLIC WORKS 8,773,000 15,510,000 10,197,000 17,255,000 11,323,000 19,216,000 10,526,000 14,346,000 12,226,000 11,308,000 9,838,000

PARKING AUTHORITY 0 0 0 947,000 947,000 1,047,000 1,047,000 897,000 897,000 897,000 897,000

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1,950,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 7,000,000 7,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000

BOARD OF EDUCATION 5,484,000 4,425,000 2,282,000 2,241,000 3,183,000 10,018,000 9,205,000 7,605,000 7,322,000 1,533,000 1,250,000

RECREATION & PARKS 3,490,000 4,613,000 2,163,000 4,935,000 1,625,000 2,030,000 740,000 1,265,000 465,000 1,265,000 880,000

LIBRARY 86,000 62,000 62,000 199,000 47,000 82,000 66,000 65,000 65,000 87,000 87,000

HISTORICAL COMMISSION 312,000 560,000 510,000 660,000 525,000 440,000 315,000 440,000 460,000 435,000 335,000

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 950,000 1,325,000 1,325,000 2,610,000 1,650,000 2,110,000 1,350,000 2,110,000 1,350,000 1,910,000 1,150,000

HEALTH 18,000 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 374,000 660,000 465,000 371,000 371,000 500,000 500,000 195,000 195,000 232,000 232,000

HUMAN RELATIONS & FAIR RENT 250,000 345,000 250,000 350,000 250,000 350,000 250,000 350,000 250,000 350,000 250,000

GRAND TOTAL $22,457,000 $32,038,000 $21,762,000 $37,272,000 $27,625,000 $40,583,000 $28,789,000 $33,408,000 $26,665,000 $20,052,000 $19,454,000

LESS: REVENUES

LOCIP 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000

PARKING AUTHORITY 0 0 0 947,000 947,000 1,047,000 1,047,000 897,000 897,000 897,000 897,000

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1,950,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 7,000,000 7,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000

BOARD OF EDUCATION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

REDEVELOPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUBTOTAL REVENUES $2,579,000 $4,629,000 $4,629,000 $8,576,000 $8,576,000 $5,676,000 $5,676,000 $4,526,000 $4,526,000 $2,526,000 $2,526,000

NET AMOUNT TO BE BONDED $19,878,000 $27,409,000 $17,133,000 $28,696,000 $19,049,000 $34,907,000 $23,113,000 $28,882,000 $22,139,000 $17,526,000 $16,928,000

Page 6 of 6

January 30, 2015

Mayor Harry W. Rilling,

Members of the Planning Commission,

Members of the Board of Estimate and Taxation

Members of the Common Council

Transmitted herewith is the compilation of all capital budget requests that I have received for the five-year period beginning July 1, 2015

together with my analysis and recommendations relative to the capital plan and my estimate of the effect of such expenditures on the City’s

operating budget and bonded indebtedness.

INTRODUCTION

The Recommended FY 2015-16 Capital Budget has been developed in the context of a national economy that is finally beginning to show

real signs of recovery. Given the depth of the last recession, however, it behooves us to proceed cautiously. My capital spending

recommendations reflect the expectation that City revenues will continue to grow modestly, and that the ability and willingness of Norwalk

taxpayers to pay higher taxes is limited. By most metrics, the recommended plan would not be considered overly aggressive, and my overall

spending recommendations are in line with the expectations from a year ago. However, even this rather modest future operating budget

impact may be more that some taxpayers are willing to pay. In deciding how large the City’s capital budget ought to be, I urge the City’s

policy makers to carefully consider the future operating budget impact of their decisions. Under the Recommended Capital Plan, the City’s total outstanding tax-supported debt is projected to increase modestly, from $216.8 million

in FY 2014-15 to $227.6 million in FY 2018-19, an increase of $10.8 million or 5.0%. Total indebtedness is projected to begin declining in

FY 2019-20. These figures exclude debt obligations which will be repaid from sources outside of the general fund. The Recommended

Capital Plan provides for new debt to be repaid from the general fund of $17.1 million in FY 2015-16; $19.0 million in FY 2016-17; $23.1

million in FY 2017-18; $22.1 million in FY 2018-19; and $16.9 million in FY 2019-20.

In analyzing the City’s capital budget and the indebtedness that the City will incur as a result of this budget, we must consider several distinct

factors. Among the items that must be considered are the following:

Capital needs of the city

Impact of the capital plan on debt position and credit rating

Impact of the capital plan on future operating budgets

Level of authorized but unissued debt outstanding for prior capital authorizations and the projected

drawdown schedule

2

After considering each of these factors, I recommend a gross capital budget for FY 2015-16 of $21,762,000; which will result in a net amount

to be bonded and repaid from the general fund of $17,133,000. The variance between the gross and net capital budgets is due to Local Capital

Improvement Program (LoCIP) grants of $629,000 and $4.0 million in Water Pollution Control Authority (WPCA) projects that will be

repaid from revenues of the WPCA.

Over the five-year horizon of the City’s Capital Improvement Program, I recommend gross capital spending of $124.3 million, with a net

amount to be bonded and repaid from the general fund of $98.4 million. Over the next five years, the City is projected to pay off $99.8

million of debt, so the City’s total indebtedness will not change much, even after factoring in authorized but unissued debt. Provided below is

my analysis that explains and supports how I arrived at the recommended gross and net capital budget amounts, followed by a detailed

summary of the recommended projects.

ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A. Capital Needs of the City

Meeting the capital needs of the City is of paramount importance in developing a recommended capital spending plan. While favorable debt

ratios are important, it is short-sighted to allow vital City infrastructure to deteriorate or to fail to invest in projects that have a demonstrable

economic payback or which promote the City’s long-term economic vitality.

Infrastructure maintenance and improvements are a vital component to the well being and continued success of the City, and they remain the

top priority of the City’s capital budget for FY 2015-16. The recommended FY 2015-16 capital budget includes nearly $10.2 million for the

Department of Public Works and $4.0 million for the Water Pollution Control Authority. This includes $5.5 million for road paving and $1.1

million for sidewalks—the largest appropriations in the City’s history for these particular projects. The Board of Education will receive

nearly $2.3 million under the recommended capital budget, while Recreation and Parks will receive more than $2.1 million.

The recommended Capital Plan includes a total of $23.2 million for Board of Education capital projects over the next five years. This

includes funds to complete Phase II of the Norwalk Early Childhood Center at Roosevelt School; install Building Management Systems at all

schools; replace windows at West Rocks Middle School; upgrade fire alarm systems; and construct improvements to Jefferson and Cranbury

Elementary schools. In addition, State reimbursement typically amounts to approximately 30% of major building projects, and we would

appropriate these funds after the State approves each project, and the amount of the reimbursement can more accurately be determined.

3

B. Impact of the Capital Plan on Debt Position and Credit Rating

Norwalk has an Aaa/AAA bond rating from all three major rating agencies, and this places Norwalk in an elite group of 18 of the 169

municipalities in Connecticut that have this highest available rating. Because of our strong credit, when Norwalk borrows money we do so at

the lowest interest rates prevailing in the marketplace.

In assigning credit ratings, the rating agencies generally focus on four broad rating factors in a community: Economic Factors (wealth levels,

tax base, employment, regional economy, etc.); Financial Factors (operating results, financial reserves, contingent obligations, etc.);

Administrative Factors (experience of the management team, financial management track record, etc.); and Debt Factors (debt as a % of full

value, debt service as a % of budget, per capita debt, etc.). In order for the City to maintain its “gilt-edged” triple A credit rating, we must

ensure that certain measures of debt remain within the ranges that the rating agencies deem acceptable for a triple A credit, and we must

adhere to a well-crafted, long range capital plan that provides predictability and demonstrates sound and prudent financial planning. While

the rating agencies do not base a rating decision on a single ratio, we know that exceeding the maximum thresholds outlined in Table 1 below

would cause concern among the rating agencies.

Table 1 – Selected Debt Ratio Measures – City vs. Maximum Thresholds

Total Debt as a Percentage of Fair

Market Value

Debt Service as a Percentage of

Expenditures

Per Capita Debt

FY 2014-15 (actual) 1.28% 8.11% $2,470

FY 2015-16 (recommended) 1.26% 8.33% $2,464

Maximum Threshold 2.00% 10.00% $3,500

Total Debt as a percentage of the fair market value of all taxable property is an important measure of debt capacity. Norwalk’s current and

recommended ratios are less than 1.5%; a ratio of less than 2% is considered favorably by the rating agencies. Norwalk’s debt service to

expenditure ratio, at less than 8.5%, is below the established 10.0% maximum threshold. The rating agencies consider ratios below 5% to be

low, from 5% to 15% to be moderate, and above 15% to be high. The City’s per capita debt is moderate at $2,470; also below its maximum

threshold of $3,500. All three debt ratio measures are expected to remain well within their established thresholds during the next five years.

Table 2 below projects the key debt benchmarks over the five-year horizon of the capital plan based on financing the previously approved

projects and the new spending based on the recommended capital plan.

4

Table 2 – Projected City of Norwalk Debt Benchmarks – FY 2015 through FY 2020

Debt Measure FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20

Debt as a % of FMV 1.28% 1.26% 1.27% 1.26% 1.24% 1.20%

Debt Service as a % of

Expenditures 8.11% 8.33% 7.97% 7.84% 8.24% 8.32%

Per Capita Debt $2,470 $2,464 $2,519 $2,560 $2,567 $2,502

Net Indebtedness – FYE $ 216,845,929 $ 216,844,819 $ 222,171,425 $ 226,436,475 $ 227,596,067 $ 222,365,666

C. Impact of the Capital Plan on Future Operating Budgets

In approving the capital budget, it is important to recognize that capital spending has a direct impact on the City’s future operating budgets

and tax rates. Amounts that are borrowed must be repaid typically over a fifteen-year period, with interest. After financing previously

approved projects and the recommended capital plan, the City’s annual debt service paid from property taxes is projected to increase from

$25.8 million in FY 2014-15 to $30.6 million in FY 2019-20, an increase of $4.8 million or 18.6% over the next five years. With a current

tax levy of approximately $284.9 million, the increase in debt service will cause a 1.7% tax increase over the next five years. Given the

increasing unwillingness of some members of the public to shoulder a greater tax burden, the members of the Board of Estimate and Taxation

and the Common Council should carefully consider the operating budget impact of the capital plan prior to approving a final capital budget.

Debt service is one of the few items in the operating budget over which we have considerable control, based on the size of the capital budget

that is approved each year. Provided in Table 3 below is a summary of expected debt service over the five year plan.

Table 3 – Projected City of Norwalk Debt Service FY 2014-15 through FY 2019-20

FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20

Current Debt Service 32,541,265 33,858,261 32,039,865 29,575,677 28,940,884 25,415,617

Projected New Debt Service - - 1,308,731 4,664,507 8,246,167 11,295,351

Total Projected Debt Service 32,541,265 33,858,261 33,348,597 34,240,184 37,187,051 36,710,968

Less: Funded from other than Taxes 7,759,256 7,865,287 7,686,940 8,180,250 8,853,189 7,153,361

5

Total Amount Financed by Taxes 24,782,009 25,992,974 25,661,656 26,059,934 28,333,862 29,557,606

Plus: Non-City Reimbursable 972,734 1,240,496 1,185,985 1,144,945 1,115,161 1,083,808

Budgeted Gen. Fund Debt Service 25,754,743 27,233,470 26,847,641 27,204,879 29,449,022 30,641,414

D. Authorized But Unissued Debt/Projected Drawdown Schedule

In order to finance the remaining authorized but unissued debt, together with the new authorizations under the proposed five-year capital plan,

our financial projections assume the following financing schedule as outlined in Table 4:

Table 4 – Projected Financing Schedule – FY 2016 through FY 2020

FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20

City Projects 14,807,000 20,416,000 19,013,000 18,039,000 14,255,000

WPCA 4,000,000 7,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,000

Parking Authority - 947,000 1,047,000 897,000 970,000

Board of Ed Projects – Net 3,326,000 2,633,000 3,100,000 3,100,000 1,600,000

Five Year Borrowings 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000

TOTAL 23,133,000 31,996,000 28,160,000 26,036,000 18,825,000

SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A total of $163.4 million has been requested from the various departments for the five-year capital improvement program. In the first year,

the requests total $32.0 million. While all of the capital requests have merit, the City does not have the financial capacity to fund them all

while maintaining its debt benchmarks within the parameters required by the rating agencies. Moreover, if all of the requests were approved,

it would result in substantially higher debt service obligations and would cause property taxes to increase further. For this reason, I am

recommending trimming back the requests to a gross total of $124.3 million over the five-year period. The portion of this amount that would

be repaid from property taxes is $98.4 million. For the upcoming FY 2015-16, I have recommended a gross capital budget of $21.8 million

whose net amount to be repaid from future property taxes is $17.1 million. A brief description of the projects recommended for FY 2015-16

follows:

6

Police Department:

The department’s recommended budget totals $38,000 for the replacement of tactical vests.

Combined Dispatch:

The department’s recommended budget totals $220,000 to upgrade radio communications and to improve radio coverage.

Fire Department:

The department’s recommended budget totals $250,000 for the following projects: $95,000 for vehicle replacement; $35,000 for various

station repairs; and $120,000 for paving fire station parking areas.

Public Works

The department’s recommended budget totals $10,197,000 for the following functional areas with the largest projects identified in each area:

Building Management total $1,403,000: City Hall roof replacement, security notification system, and air conditioning system

filtration system - $706,000; Public Works Center repairs and improvements - $218,000; Nathaniel Ely window replacement -

$160,000; Lockwood House ADA accessibility - $80,000; other building improvements, various locations - $239,000.

Bridges total $296,000: Residual funding required for the 20% City match requirement for the Perry Avenue Bridge over the

Norwalk River.

Fleet total $330,000: One 37,000 lb dump truck - $220,000; F-550 dump truck - $45,000; flatbed truck - $40,000; and

drainage attachments - $25,000.

Road Reconstruction total $6,100,000: City’s pavement management program, $5,500,000; and Norwalk River Valley Trail

20% local match - $600,000.

Sidewalks total $1,128,000: Citywide sidewalk and curbing appropriation - $1,000,000; footpath replacement - $100,000; and

sidewalks & curbs – City buildings, $28,000.

Storm Water Management total $350,000: $250,000 for general drainage repair, and $100,000 for storm water management.

In addition, while no funds were recommended for watercourse maintenance in the FY 2015-16 capital budget, the department

recently requested that the City close out a completed capital project (Buckingham Lockwood Drainage Improvement Project)

7

with an available balance of $876,000, and that these surplus capital funds be appropriated for Watercourse Maintenance. This

request will be presented to the Planning Commission, Board of Estimate and Taxation, and Common Council in the near

future.

Traffic Management total $400,000: $250,000 for Traffic Signal Upgrades, and $150,000 for Striping and Signage (including

Bike Lanes).

Tree Planting total $50,000: Annual appropriation for citywide tree planting.

Transfer Station total $140,000: For the replacement of the third municipal solid waste compactor. The replacement of the

first two compactors was funded in FY 2014-15.

Water Pollution Control Authority

All debt service associated with WPCA projects will be repaid from the revenues of the WPCA. The department’s recommended budget

totals $4,000,000 for the following projects: Main Lift Pump Replacement, $3,000,000; Ely Avenue/Bouton Street Hydraulic Repair,

$1,000,000.

Board of Education

The department’s recommended budget totals $2,282,000 for the following projects: Norwalk Early Childhood Center- Phase II, $557,000;

District Building Management System (BMS), $500,000 per year in each of the next two years; District Technology Plan, $750,000; West

Rocks Middle School Window Replacement, $75,000 for design, with construction to follow in FY 2016-17; District Paving & Curbing,

$350,000; District Fire Alarm System Upgrades, $50,000.

Recreation and Parks

The department’s recommended budget totals $2,163,000 for the following projects: Veteran’s Memorial Park Boat Launch Ramp

Replacement, $800,000; Brien McMahon School Turf Field Replacement, $500,000; Cranbury/Gallaher Estate, $350,000; Vehicles,

$188,000; Basketball and Tennis Court Refurbishment, $100,000; School & Park Playgrounds, $90,000; Backstop and Fencing Replacement,

$50,000; Open Space Fund, $50,000; and Tree Planting, $35,000.

Library

The department’s recommended budget totals $62,000 for the following projects: SoNo Library Auditorium Soundproofing, $18,000;

Children’s Room Renovations, $23,000; and Norwalk Newspaper Digitization, $21,000.

8

Historical Commission

The department’s recommended budget totals $510,000 for the following projects: Mathews Park Buildings Restoration, $40,000; Lockwood

Mathews Mansion Roof, $216,000; Mill Hill Master Plan-ADA access, $94,000; Lockwood House Museum-ADA access, $100,000; WPA

Murals Conservation, $25,000; Lockwood Mathews Mansion Improvements (rewiring), $25,000; and Cemetery Site Work, $10,000.

Redevelopment Agency

The department’s recommended budget totals $1,325,000 for the following projects: Choice Neighborhoods District (infrastructure

improvements), $1,300,000; Public Art, $25,000.

Information Technology

The department’s recommended budget totals $465,000 for all Citywide Information Technology Projects, including funding for the City’s

Technology Refresh Program. The recommended amount reflects the fact that the Information Technology Director has recently identified

$195,000 in surplus funds that is available from prior year capital appropriations that can be applied toward the cost of the projects planned

for FY 2015-16.

Health Department

No funds are recommended for the Health Department in FY 2015-16. The item requested by the Department will be funded from the City’s

Insurance fund.

Human Relations and Fair Rent

The department’s recommended budget totals $250,000 for the continuation of the citywide ADA compliance projects.

9

CONCLUSION

The recommended capital budget for FY 2014-15 totals $21,762,000. With offsetting revenues and other repayment sources, the total amount

that will be bonded and repaid from property taxes is $17,133,000. With the City’s existing debt profile this is the maximum amount of

additional debt that the City can safely afford, while still maintaining favorable debt ratio benchmarks and limiting the impact on future

operating budgets.

I would like to thank the departments and agencies for their cooperation and assistance in compiling this Capital Budget, and commend my

staff for their work in preparing this document. I look forward to assisting the Planning Commission, the Board of Estimate and Taxation,

and the Common Council in evaluating the capital requests and developing a workable, financially sound capital plan.

Respectfully Submitted,

Thomas Hamilton

Director of Finance

1

-

50,000,000

100,000,000

150,000,000

200,000,000

250,000,000

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Fisc

al Y

ear

Amount

Existing and Future Debt

Future Debt

Existing Debt

2

0.00%

0.25%

0.50%

0.75%

1.00%

1.25%

1.50%

1.75%

2.00%

2.25%

2.50%

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Fiscal Year

Net Debt as a Percent of Full Equalized Value

future debt

existing debt

ct median

benchmark

3

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Annual Debt Service to General Fund Expenditures

Existing Debt Future Debt Benchmark CT Aaa Median

`

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SUMMARY PAGE

DEPARTMENT: Police

PROJECT TITLE

2015-16 REQUEST

2016-17 REQUEST

2017-18 REQUEST

2018-19 REQUEST

2019-20 REQUEST

1. Tactical Vests 37,500

2. Mobile Command Vehicle 118,950

3.

4.

5.

6. 7.

8. 9.

10.

11.

12. 13.

14.

15.

16. 17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

TOTAL 37,500 118,950

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Police PROJECT TITLE: Tactical Vests PROJECT LIFE: 10 years SCHEDULED START: Upon Approval SCHEDULED COMPLETION:

RANKING: 1 __ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Titan Assault Enhanced BR01 Ballistics NIJ 0101.06 IIIA Compliant Vest with Molle system FAV MKII enhanced BR01 Ballistics NIG 0101.06 IIIA Compliant Vest with Molle System. APV BR01 Ballistics NIJ 0101.06 IIIA Compliant Vest with Molle System. 25 Vests @ $1,500 each

JUSTIFICATION: Officer Safety

EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (000's)

PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design

Site Costs & Acquisition

Construction

Equipment/Materials 37,500 37,500

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 37,500 37,500

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 37,500 37,500

CAPITAL BUDGET A-1

A-2 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Police PROJECT TITLE: Tactical Vests 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No_x _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $________________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Direct quote from manufacturer. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Necessary for officer safety.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?

Outdated equipment will still be in use.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Police PROJECT TITLE: Mobile Command Vehicle PROJECT LIFE: 20 years SCHEDULED START: Upon Approval SCHEDULED COMPLETION:

RANKING: 2 X_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: The MCV9000/14 is a Mobile Command Vehicle The design of the MCV9000/14 is dedicated to the process of Mobile Command. The dual 120V AC / 12V DC power capabilities allow the Emergency Response Team to operate at an incident scene for extended periods of time. Office type lighting, roof mounted air conditioning, forced air heating, spacious conference and radio areas provide a comfortable work environment. All of these features are provided in a vehicle that is easy to drive, set-up, and operate.

JUSTIFICATION: An emergency can happen at any time and in any place. The MCV9000/14 was designed so operators can quickly respond to the most remote or hard to get to incident scene. Unlike larger Command Vehicles, the MCV9000/14 does not require an operator with CDL licensing or special training to drive the vehicle. The vehicle features a standard “Van”: front and is very maneuverable in heavy traffic, on tight city streets, or on small rural roads. With the addition of the Optional Four Wheel Drive, the vehicle’s mobility is further enhanced for use in bad weather and rough terrain.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 118,950 118,950

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 118,950 118,950

CAPITAL BUDGET A-3

A-4 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Police PROJECT TITLE: Mobile Command Vehicle 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X__ No_ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $______118,950_____________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Direct quote from provider. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Vital to operations at special events where a command post must be set up.


A decreased efficiency in mobile crime unit command.


DEPARTMENT: Combined Dispatch

PROJECT TITLE

2015-16 REQUEST

2016-17 REQUEST

2017-18 REQUEST

2018-19 REQUEST

2019-20 REQUEST

1. Radio Receiver Upgrade 220,000

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

TOTAL 220,000

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Combined Dispatch PROJECT TITLE: Radio Receiver Upgrade PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: Upon Approval SCHEDULED COMPLETION:

RANKING: 1 _X_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Radio upgrade to enhance communication system within Norwalk High School and Brien McMahon High School. The price includes the following:

• Providing IP Gateways for all RX sites on Channel 1 * Existing receivers will be reused

• Providing GTR8000 repeaters and support equipment for Hospital, McMahon and Norwalk High for channel 1

• Providing new antenna system for Norwalk High School

• Providing TX and RX Multicoupler/combiner for 3 channels for McMahon and Norwalk High (One channel active now).

•

JUSTIFICATION: The current radio system is inadequate for the safety of officers and students at both schools. Radio upgrade will enhance communication in the surrounding area. The need for this project became more evident this year due to incidents that occurred where officers had little or no communication with headquarters, also, there are now full time School Resource Officers employed at the school.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Construction

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency 220,000 220,000


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 220,000 220,000

CAPITAL BUDGET

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK

DEPARTMENT : Combined Dispatch PROJECT TITLE: Radio Receiver Upgrade 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $________________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Estimate from vendor 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No _X__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Project is necessary to maintain communication access.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Lack of communication at schools including the inability of officers to dispatch and receive via radio from both schools.


DEPARTMENT: Fire

PROJECT TITLE

2015-16 REQUEST

2016-17 REQUEST

2017-18 REQUEST

2018-19 REQUEST

2019-20 REQUEST

1. Vehicle Replacement 95

2. Various Station Repairs 35 35 35 35 35

3. Fire Station Paving 120

4. Apparatus Replacement 550 100 1,000

5. 100 Fairfield Ave Building Repairs 475

6. SCBA Replacement 280

7. Fire Station 3,000

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

TOTAL 250 585 790 3,135 1,035

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Fire PROJECT TITLE: Vehicle Replacement PROJECT LIFE: 10 years SCHEDULED START: 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2015

RANKING: 1 ___ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Replace Command Car. Replace Cab and Chassis for Flatbed Truck.

JUSTIFICATION:

Command Car is a heavy use Emergency Response vehicle operated 24/7 by the shift commander. Existing Ford Diesel has been problematic. Existing Utility Flat Bed is a 1980 Ford. Existing flatbed would be remounted on new chassis.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials 95

95

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 95

95

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 95 95

CAPITAL BUDGET B-1

B-2 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Fire PROJECT TITLE: Vehicle Replacement 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_____________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? State Bid List.. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Command Vehicle has been problematic (Diesel Motor issues). Flat Bed is 1980, standard transmission vehicle.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Expensive repairs and loss of use of Command Vehicle.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Fire PROJECT TITLE: Various Station Repairs PROJECT LIFE: 20 years SCHEDULED START: SCHEDULED COMPLETION:

RANKING: 2 ___ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Four Fire Stations and the Maintenance Facility are in continuous need of minor – moderate repairs.

JUSTIFICATION: The age of the buildings has created the need for this work. Station Year Built Meadow Street 1970 New Canaan Avenue 1964 Westport Avenue 1966 Van Zant Street 1884 Fairfield Avenue 1980


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials 35 35 35 35 35 175

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 35 35 35 35 35 175

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 35 35 35 35 35 175

CAPITAL BUDGET B-3

B-4 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Fire PROJECT TITLE: Various Station Repairs 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_____________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Previous estimates 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No X___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

The maintenance of the stations is an ongoing need. The department has reduced the number and scope of emergency repairs by systematic and planned upgrades to our infrastructure.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? The department’s infrastructure gets intensive daily use. If the project is not funded we will be forced to make repairs on an emergency basis which will be very costly.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Fire PROJECT TITLE: Fire Station Paving PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2016


DESCRIPTION: Continuation of paving project funded in FY 2012-2013. Pave rear apron and parking lot at Station #1.

JUSTIFICATION: Rear apron in front of apparatus overhead doors is deteriorating causing wear and tear to trucks. Lot has not been paved in 20+ years.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 140 120 260

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 140 120

260

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 140 120 260

CAPITAL BUDGET B-5

B-6 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Fire PROJECT TITLE: Fire Station Paving 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_____________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? Not enough funds in FY 2012-2013 project to finish paving at Station #1. 2. How was your cost estimate derived? DPW Paving Bid FY 2014-2015. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No _X__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Apron has been patched several times. Needs to be completely replaced.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Additional wear and tear on truck suspension due to dips in apron. Unable to plow snow efficiently due to uneven surface and cracks.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Fire PROJECT TITLE: Apparatus Replacement PROJECT LIFE: 15 years SCHEDULED START: 7/1/16 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2015

RANKING: 4 X__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Fire Apparatus Replacement: 16/17 Pumping Engine #3. 18/19 Replacement Tractor for Haz-Mat 1 19/20 Aerial Ladder #1.

JUSTIFICATION: Front fire trucks to be replaced on 15 year cycle then moved to reserve status as recommended by Matrix Consulting.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials

550

100 1,000 1,650

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

550

100 1,000 1,650

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 550 100 1,000 1,650

CAPITAL BUDGET B-7

B-8 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Fire PROJECT TITLE: Apparatus Replacement 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_____________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? Need for Replacement still exists. 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Previous bids. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No X___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Increased Maintenance costs can be anticipated if replacement is not funded.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Fire PROJECT TITLE: 100 Fairfield Ave. Bldg. Repairs PROJECT LIFE: 20+ years SCHEDULED START: SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2015


DESCRIPTION: Replace roof at Offices, Storage and Apparatus Maintenance facility (100 Fairfield Avenue). Complete stripping and painting of metal exterior.

JUSTIFICATION: The existing roof is original to the facility and over 25 years old. Emergency repairs were completed in 2007 to fix active leaks. Ongoing roof leaks continue to create internal damage. Patching is expensive and an inadequate solution to this problem. The Department anticipates use of the facility for offices, vehicle maintenance, and storage far into the future. The base metal is unprotected from elements. This city facility is the very first municipal building that residents and visitors see as they arrive in Norwalk from I-95 exit 14. The project is essential to protect the building from further deterioration and to present a good image of the city to the public.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design



Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 25

475

500

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 25

475

500

CAPITAL BUDGET B-9

B-10 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Fire PROJECT TITLE: 100 Fairfield Ave. Bldg. Repairs 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $475,000_________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 4 15/15/sq. foot including roof decking and flashing. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

This project is necessary for the safe and efficient use of the facility. The repairs made in 2007 will not provide more than several years of continued viability of the existing roof.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? The department was forced to spend considerable funds to clean the building of extensive mold growth after the roof repairs were completed in 2007. As the building is used more extensively, the return of active roof leaks and mold would be a health hazard and would result in expensive damage.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Fire PROJECT TITLE: SCBA Replacement PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: 2017 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2018


DESCRIPTION: In 17/18 the department will replace 50 SCBA units and RIT SCBA units which were originally purchased with a FEMA Fire Act Grant.

JUSTIFICATION: The SCBA units receive hard use at structure fires and other emergencies. NFPA recommends replacement after 10 years. The new units will be equipped with tracker technology to help locate trapped firefighters,


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials

280

280

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

280

280

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST

280

280

CAPITAL BUDGET B-11

B-12 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Fire PROJECT TITLE: SCBA Replacement 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $280__________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? Need remains, SCBA needs replacement and upgrade. 2. How was your cost estimate derived? State contract pricing. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No X__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Existing Air Packs are 10 years old. Maintenance and repairs have increased. NFPA is recommending replacement after 10 years. New packs will have technology to allow Commander to track movement/location of Firefighters in a fire.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Repair costs increase. We presently cannot track pack wearers location at a fire. This technology did not exist when existing units were purchased.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Fire PROJECT TITLE: Fire Station PROJECT LIFE: 50 years SCHEDULED START: 2018 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2019


DESCRIPTION: Build new Station 6 or combine existing Station 4 (Westport Avenue). Station to improve Fire protection in the Northeast quadrant of the City including Cranbury neighborhood.

JUSTIFICATION: Repeated evaluations of the Fire Protection for the Northeast quadrant of the city indicate long response time and longer 2qnd due (backup) response. Option 1 is to build a new Station 6. Option 2 is to relocate the existing Station 4 or relocate additional staffing into a renovated Station 4. These options will address this deficiency. A targeted study will be completed in 15/16 to advise and inform this project decision.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials

3,000

3,000

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

3,000

3,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST

3,000

3,000

CAPITAL BUDGET B-13

B-14 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Fire PROJECT TITLE: Fire Station 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $1,000,000_______________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Previous bids. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ X__ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Several internal and external studies have identified the need for this project.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? If the study recommends a new station, 16 new personnel will need to be hired. A relocated or renovated Station 4 will only incur construction Costs without increasing personnel costs.

G:\EXCEL\CAPBUD\FY 15-16\5 Yr Cap Bud Summary 2016-20 Submittal.xls 1/30/20152:11 PM

PriorityFY 2014-15 Approved

FY 2015-16 Requested FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20

A BUILDING City Hall Repairs/Improvements 1 730,000 914,000 530,000 265,000 300,000 203,000MANAGEMENT Capital repairs,Replacements & Improvements 2 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000

Nathaniel Ely Repairs/Improvements 3 145,000 160,000 35,000 750,000Public Works Center Repairs/Improvements 4 105,000 218,000 250,000Energy Conservation - Various Buildings 5 25,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000Police HQ Repairs/Improvements 6 20,000 49,000Lockwood House 7 30,000 80,000Ben Franklin Repairs/Improvements 8 77,000 48,000 165,000 165,000 167,000Main Library 9 100,000 42,000 535,000 105,000 16,000Life safety - various buildings 10 15,000Environmental Remediation Various Buildings 11 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000

1,302,000 1,626,000 1,610,000 1,380,000 578,000 298,000

B BRIDGES Perry Avenue bridge over Norwalk River 1 190,000 296,000Glover Avenue Bridge improvements 2 250,000 1,000,000Perry Avenue bridge over Silvermine (pointing) 3 30,000 300,000James Street Bridge over Silvermine 4General Bridge Repairs 5 65,000 65,000East Avenue Roadway and Bridge 6

190,000 576,000 1,365,000 0 65,000 0

C FLEET Vehicles/equipment 1 805,000 770,000 790,000 966,000 883,000 440,000

D MAPPING Drainage System mapping 1 0 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000

E PAVEMENT Pavement Management 1 5,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000PROGRAMS City Hall parking facilities 2 250,000

Norwalk River Valley Trail 3 750,000 1,500,000Washington Street 4 200,000

5,200,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 7,500,000

F SIDEWALK Sidewalks and Curbing - Road Paving 1 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000Sidewalks and Curbing - Citywide 2 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000Footpath Replacement 3 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000Sidewalks - City buildings/property 4 28,000 50,000 50,000

500,000 1,628,000 1,600,000 1,650,000 1,600,000 1,650,000

G STORM General Drainage 1 250,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000WATER Honeysuckle-Daphne Diversion 2 350,000 1,000,000

Watercourse Maintenance 3 1,500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000Stormwater Quality Management (MS4) 4 500,000 200,000 200,000 200,000Water Street outlet maintenance 5 300,000 300,000Keeler Brook Drainage Area 6 4,000,000 2,000,000Culvert rehabilitation 7 400,000

250,000 2,850,000 3,000,000 6,100,000 4,000,000 500,000

H TRAFFIC Traffic Signals at Various Locations 1 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000Striping and signing (incl bike lanes) 2 300,000 200,000 200,000Incident Management System 3 250,000 750,000 750,000 100,000 100,000Transportation Management Plan 4 200,000 1,320,000 1,800,000 500,000 500,000

200,000 800,000 2,320,000 3,000,000 850,000 800,000

I TREES Tree Planting - General 1 50,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000

J SAFETEALU FHWA Matching Funds 1 250,000 250,000MATCH Safe Routes to Schools 2 200,000

0 0 450,000 0 250,000 0

K OTHER Transfer station - compactor replacements 1 276,000 140,000Transfer station repairs 2

276,000 140,000 - - - -

TOTALS 8,773,000 15,510,000 17,255,000 19,216,000 14,346,000 11,308,000

Department of Public WorksFive Year Capital Budget Requirements Forecast

2015 - 16 CITY OF NORWALK

DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: City Hall Repairs and Improvements

PROJECT LIFE: 20 Years SCHEDULED START: Various SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Various

RANKING: A-1 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT DESCRIPTION: A. Security Notification System ($156,000)

B. Sand Filter Installation for air conditioning system ($20,000)

C. Roof replacement including the copper on the atrium dome, flashings and masonry repairs ($1,060,000) FY 2015 – 16 $530,000 FY 2016 – 17 $530,000

D. Improvements to Community Room ($208,000) Including Sound/ IT system installation with ADA Compliance, replacing existing lighting, restore library book display cabinets, refinish existing woodwork, update of kitchen facilities

E. Concert Hall repairs to ceiling and painting ($265,000) F. Interior upgrade ($300,000)

G. Interior Painting Plan ($203,000)

JUSTIFICATION: A. Currently City Hall does not have a building wide notification system to alert occupants of any threats (active shooter, bomb threat, etc.) The office of

emergency management is currently reviewing systems with the capabilities of using integrated communications through office desktop computers, phones and cell phones. This number also includes an estimate to update notification systems in the Health Department.

B. During a recent manufacturer’s inspection and service of the buildings air conditioning chillers, it was recommended that a sand filter be installed on the condensing water loop supporting the chillers. The sand filter is designed to filter damage causing particulates from the water entering the system.

C. The roof, parapet walls, chimney and atrium copper dome were installed in 1986 and have an estimated life of 20 – 25 years. The roof is beginning to show signs of deterioration and leaks and has exceeded its estimated life cycle period. This project could be performed in three phases to reduce fiscal impact to the City. $530,000 was approved in the 2014 – 15 fiscal year Capital Budget request.

D. City Hall Community Room is a multipurpose facility that has served the public and City Hall functions extensively through the years. The Community Room was renovated in 1987 as part of the City Hall renovation project. This was formerly the Norwalk High School Library. Although the basic character of the room was preserved, some features were removed and should be properly replaced, such as the original light fixtures and book cabinets. In addition, a proper PA system and IT access is essential in meeting the needs of various events that occupy the space, as well as meeting ADA requirements. In regard to the kitchen area, upgrade of the kitchen facility equipment is required.

E. Norwalk Concert Hall requires repairs to walls, ceilings and painting as a result of age and damage caused by several roof leaks. F. Building interior finishes and equipment such as but not limited to; door hardware, ceiling and floor tiles, wallpaper, and other interior finishes require

replacement as they are over 25 years old are beyond repair. G. Funding is required to begin a five year painting program to included but not limited to offices, restrooms, hallways, doors and trim, wallpaper etc. Building

Management will survey offices and common areas to determine a priority sequence based upon existing condition.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-2016

2016-2017

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019-2020

TOTAL

Engineering/Design 143 8 151


Construction 2,221 906 530 265 300 203 4,425

Equipment/Furnishings

Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,364 914 530 265 300 203 4,576

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 2,364 914 530 265 300 203 4,576

CAPITAL BUDGET -C1-

-C2- 2015 - 16

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: City Hall Repairs & Improvements

PROJECT COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR

2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020

PRO

JEC

T A 156 0 0 0 0 B 20 0 0 0 0 C 530 530 0 0 0

D 208 0 0 0 0

E 0 0 265 0 0

F 0 0 0 300 0

G 0 0 0 0 203

TOTAL 914 530 265 300 203

TOTAL 2,212

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes X_ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request Ongoing_____ Approved __$730,000___ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

Contractor Estimates 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No X_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Security: Currently City Hall does not have a building wide mass communications notification system to alert occupants of any threats. A building wide security system is supported and recommended by the City Hall Emergency Planning Team. Roof: The roof has reached its life cycle. The roof is beginning to show significant signs of deterioration and Building Management is experiencing leaks in areas such as the atrium, Planning & Zoning office and the Concert Hall. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Security: Without a mass communications system in place the potential for greater consequences during a threat exists. Roof: The roof is showing signs of deterioration and leaks that penetrate into the building and will cause interior damage to ceilings, walls, office equipment etc.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works

CATEGORY: Building Management TITLE: Various City Bldgs. –Capital Replacements, Repairs & Improvements

PROJECT LIFE: Various SCHEDULED START: Various SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Various

RANKING: A-2 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Capital replacements and repairs to infrastructure at City buildings

JUSTIFICATION: Most buildings under Building Management are within a range of 20 – 70 years old and require replacement and repair of major building components often without notice. As buildings are aging, unplanned capital replacements and repairs of mechanical equipment are necessary. The following are examples of unexpected replacement projects that were completed:

• City Hall – Air Handler Major Component Replacement • City Hall – Elevators Door Operator Replacement

Approval of this capital request will help to prolong major equipment and structural replacements.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-2016

2016-2017

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019-2020

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 200 50 50 50 50 50 450


Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 200 50 50 50 50 50 450

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 200 50 50 50 50 50 450

CAPITAL BUDGET -C3-

-C4- 2015 - 16

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Various City Bldgs. – Capital Replacements, Repairs & Improvements


PRO

JEC

T

2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020 A 50 50 50 50 50

TOTAL 50 50 50 50 50

TOTAL 250

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes___X__ No _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request Ongoing______ Approved ___$50,000 __ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Contractor and Engineering estimates 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No X _ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions ________________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Due to the age of the buildings ranging from 20 – 70 years, this project is necessary to provide replacement of any unforeseen failure of mechanical heating and air conditioning equipment and/ or interior and exterior infrastructure at City buildings under Building Management.


Basic infrastructure and building systems which support heating, air conditioning etc. could be significantly impacted and depending on the severity could lead to building closure.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Nathaniel Ely


RANKING: A-3 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT DESCRIPTION: A. Design and Replacement of eighty-three (83)

windows and frames in rear of building FY 2015-16 ($160,000)

B. Engineering assessment & design services for boiler replacement ($35,000)

C. Boiler Replacement and steam to hot water conversion ($750,000)

JUSTIFICATION: A. The single pane windows at the rear of the building are original to the building (1955). They show signs of wear,

safety concerns, and are not energy efficient. Based on the test results, the window caulking, and glazing have been classified as “Asbestos Containing Material”. The cost of this project includes design services, abatement, removal and installation of new windows and frames. This project could be performed in two phases to reduce budgetary impact to the City. Energy efficiency rebates will be pursued for this project. $145,000 was approved in the fiscal year 2014 -15 Capital Budget Request.

B. Building Management is requesting funds for engineering assessment and design services for the replacement of existing steam boilers to Hydronic boilers and the conversion of the heating distribution system to a Hydronic system.

C. The steam heat distribution system is original to the building and is no longer effective in providing balanced heat within the building. The existing boilers will be replaced with new energy efficient boilers. Energy efficiency rebates will be pursued for this project.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-2016

2016-2017

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019-2020

TOTAL



Construction 252 160 750 1,162


Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 296 160 35 750 1,241

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 296 160 35 750 1,241

CAPITAL BUDGET -C5-

-C6- 2015 - 16

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Nathaniel Ely


PRO

JEC

T

2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020

A 160 0 0 0 0 B 0 35 0 0 0 C 0 0 750 0 0

TOTAL 160 35 750 0 0

TOTAL 945

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes X_ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request Ongoing______ Approved __$145,000_____ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Contractor Estimates 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No X_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions ________________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Inoperable and broken windows could pose a safety hazard to children in the area. The existing 83 single pane windows are original to the building and require replacement as they are not energy efficient. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Potential safety hazard could exist, and the building will not achieve improved operating and energy efficiency.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management TITLE: Public Works Center Repairs & Improvements


RANKING: A-4 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT DESCRIPTION:

A. Upgrade controls on heating units 1 through 5 in the DPW

Garage Area ($28,000) B. Replace Obsolete Fire Panels($25,000) C. Salt Shed Repairs ($50,000) D. Vehicle Fuel Storage Tank Replacements ($250,000) E. Security Camera Replacement ($115,00)

JUSTIFICATION:

A. The heating units for the garage areas at the Public Works Center are not equipped with controls tied into the Building Management System (BMS). Units operate at full capacity and operate 24/7 during the winter months. Controls would reduce energy costs, extend equipment life, and provide freeze protection for the existing fire sprinkler system.

B. At the Public Works Center there are two fire panels one serving the Administration Building and one servicing the Dispatch Building. The fire panels are over 25 years old and are in need of repair frequently. The panel that serves the Dispatch Building is no longer being supported by the manufacture and replacement parts are difficult to acquire. Replacement of the fire panels is essential as it provides life safety communication for the buildings and a quick response time from the fire department.

C. Repairs to the concrete foundation wall at the salt Shed are required to maintain the integrity of the structure. Concrete deterioration has exposed steel reinforcement (rebar). The poor concrete will be cut and chipped out and rebar replaced as needed. Concrete patch will be placed and the wall coated with salt resistant material.

D. The vehicle fuel storage tanks require replacement. The containment vessels are leaking and the tanks are scheduled for replacement.

E. The current security system is at the end of its life span and needs to be replaced. New system will be incorporated in City-wide camera system.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-2016

2016-2017

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019-2020

TOTAL



Construction 1,037 215 250

1,502


Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,057 218 250

1,525

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 1,057 218 250

1,525

CAPITAL BUDGET -C7-

-C8- 2015 - 16

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Public Works Center Repairs & Improvements


2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020

PRO

JEC

T A 28 0 0 0 0 B 25

0 0 0

C 50 0

0 0 D

250

0 0

E 115

Total 218 250 0 0 0

TOTAL 468

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes X_ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request Ongoing______ Approved ___$ 105,000 ___ If not, why is the project now included?

2. How was your cost estimate derived? Consulting Engineers Estimates 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No X _ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions ________________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Existing controls are pneumatic and are not integrated into the Building Management System (BMS). Replacement of control equipment will provide complete control of fan coils units (5) in truck garage area and would potentially reduce energy cost. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Pneumatic controls are reaching their end of life cycle and could fail which without notice leaving truck garage area without sufficient heat. If this project is deferred or not funded, energy efficiency will not be achieved and heating efficiency will be lost.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management TITLE: Various Buildings – Energy Conservation


RANKING: A-5 NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Implementation of ongoing building energy conservation projects and equipment for city buildings with a favorable rate of return on investment

JUSTIFICATION:

This initiative is in response to continued energy conservation and operating cost reductions at various City buildings. Proposed projects would include, but not be limited to lighting, off-hour temperature control, installation of controls for schedule optimization and energy program upgrades etc. The proposed funding would be used to supplement local utility conservation incentives, consulting services and development.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-2016

2016-2017

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019-2020

TOTAL

Engineering/Design 10 10


Construction 195 50 25 25 25 25 345



REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 205 50 25 25 25 25 355

CAPITAL BUDGET -C9-

C10- 2015 - 16

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Various Buildings – Energy Conservation


PRO

JEC

T

2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020 A 50 25 25 25 25

TOTAL 50 25 25 25 25

TOTAL 150

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan? Yes _X__ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request Ongoing_ Approved _$ ____25,000___ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Contractor Estimate 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____ No X_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions ___________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Rising energy costs. Enhance energy Conservation.


A portion of rising energy costs would not be offset if this were deferred.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Police Headquarters


RANKING: A-6 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT DESCRIPTION: Front entry retaining walls/planters ($49,000)

JUSTIFICATION: The planter retaining walls in the entry plaza are showing signs of deterioration. This is visually observed by stress cracks, scaling, and water penetration, thereby requiring replacement.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-2016

2016-2017

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019-2020

TOTAL

Engineering/Design




Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 139 49 188

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 139 49 188

CAPITAL BUDGET -C11-

-C12- 2015 - 16

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Police Headquarters


PRO

JEC

T

2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020 A 49 0 0 0 0 B 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 49 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 49

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes X_ No _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request Ongoing ______ Approved __$20,000_________ If not, why is the project now included?

2. How was your cost estimate derived?

Contractor’s Estimate 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No X _ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions ________________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. The existing retaining wall shows signs of deterioration (broken, flaked, or pitted surface). During the winter season he freeze/thaw cycle creates stress cracks which appear along the retaining wall. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? As time moves forward, conditions will worsen during each winter season.

2015 - 16 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT TITLE: Lockwood House – Repairs and Improvements PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: SCHEDULED COMPLETION:

RANKING: A-7 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT ___ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Replacement of 36 fan coil units and associated components such as air compressor, thermostats and controls

JUSTIFICATION: There are 36 fan coil units which supply heating and cooling to the rooms within the building. The units are over 38 years old; beginning to fail and have gone well beyond their life cycle.

In April of 2014, the City’s Purchasing Department advertised the replacement of the fan coils for bid. The result of the lowest responsible bid was approximately $80,000 over the estimate for the project. Building Management is requesting the additional funds in the fiscal year 2015 – 16 capital plan to initiate this project.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-2016

2016-2017

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019-2020

TOTAL





Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 118 80 198

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 118 80 198


-C14- 2015 - 16

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT TITLE: Lockwood House


PRO

JEC

T

2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020 2015-

16 80 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 80 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 80

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $______ Approved ________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Contractor Estimates 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No X__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _____________________________________________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Additional funding would be required for this project to include the cost of equipment and carpentry work to construct enclosures for the fan coil units. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Existing fan coil units could fail and providing heat and air conditioning in various rooms within the building could be hampered.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Ben Franklin


RANKING: A-8 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT DESCRIPTION: A. Replacement and repair of windows ($48,000)

B. Roof replacement($330,000) FY2016-17 ($165,000) FY2017-18 ($165,000)

C. Replacement of thirty-eight (38) fan coil units

($167,000)

JUSTIFICATION: A. A large portion of the existing windows do not fit securely within their frames, are out of alignment and

are missing hardware parts. Full replacement and / or repair will add longevity to the operations of the windows.

B. The existing EPDM roof was installed in 1991 and is approaching its life cycle. The roof has undergone several phases of repairs; most recently a project was completed in the summer of 2008 that entailed repair of all roof seams which extended the life of the roof. The roof will be replaced with an energy efficient membrane roof.

C. The fan coil units and associated piping supporting heating and air conditioning are approximately twenty years old and require replacement.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-2016

2016-2017

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019-2020

TOTAL



Construction 222 48 165 165 167 767


Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 237 48 165 165 167 782

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 237 48 165 165 167 782


-C16- 2015 - 16

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Ben Franklin


PRO

JEC

T 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020

A 48 0 0 0 0 B 0 165 0 0 0 C 0 0 165 0 0 D 0 0 0 167 0 E 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 48 165 165 167 0

TOTAL 545

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes X _ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request Ongoing ____ Approved _____$77,000______ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Contractor Estimate 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No X_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions ________________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Approximately 76 windows are no longer sitting securely within their frames; are out of alignment and/ or missing hardware. These conditions also present a safety concern when windows are opened and closed. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Safety concerns when operating windows.


DEPARTMENT: Library CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Main Library Repairs & Improvements

PROJECT LIFE: 20 Years SCHEDULED START: Various SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Various

RANKING: A-9 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT DESCRIPTION:

A. Main Library building preservation of exterior wood façade and replacement of two (2) exterior light fixtures ($42,000)

B. Mechanical HVAC system modifications engineering and

design ($35,000)

C. Mechanical HVAC system replacement and upgrade ($605,000) 2015 – 2016 ($500,000)

2016 – 2017 ($105,000)

D. Exterior Lighting Upgrade ($16,000)

JUSTIFICATION: A. The wood façade on the building is showing signs of rotting and is in need of replacement. One exterior flood light has fallen from its

mounting on the wood due to this condition.

B. A building study for the Main Library was completed by an engineering firm in 2013. The recommendations from the engineering report indicate; new gas fired boilers and a conversion from steam to hot water heat. In addition to replacing the boilers, the 6,000 gallon oil tank will be removed; electronic controls installed; pumps, motors, fans and cabinet heaters replaced. Building Management is requesting funds for the engineering, design and plan of action for replacing the various systems.

C. Replacement of the oil/ steam heating with a natural gas and hydronic system including condensing water pumps, domestic hot water heater. This project will include the installation of building management system (BMS) to better control the heating and cooling in the building. Currently the Main Library has limited control on the air conditioning and heating system due to antiquated and malfunctioning controls. This project can be performed over the course of two years to reduce the budgetary impact to the City.

D. The entranceway and the sidewalk along Mott Avenue leading to the parking lot are dark all winter when the library is open until 8:30pm.

The flood lighting along the Belden Avenue side of the building will show the City’s commitment to the Wall Street area redevelopment. This project will include the addition of energy efficient security lighting along the Mott Avenue sidewalk.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-2016

2016-2017

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019-2020

TOTAL



Construction 100 39 500 105 16 760



REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 100 42 535 105 16 798


-C18- 2015 - 16

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Library CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Main Library Repairs & Improvements


PRO

JEC

T 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020

A 42 0 0 0 0 B 0 535 0 0 0 C 0 0 105 0 0

D 0 0 0 16 0 TOTAL 42 535 105 16 0

TOTAL 698

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes X_ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request Ongoing_____ Approved __$100,000___ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

Contractor Estimates

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No X_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Rotted and damaged exterior wood will continue to deteriorate causing additional damage to the exterior of the building. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Eventually, due to the damaged and rotted wood the likelihood of water penetration into the building could cause interior damage to ceilings, walls and furnishings.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Various Bldgs – Life Safety

PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: Various SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Various

RANKING: A-10 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIP. X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Replace and/or install life safety equipment such as emergency exit lights, emergency lighting and emergency egress door hardware at various City buildings.

JUSTIFICATION: Periodically life safety equipment must be replaced due to failures and changes in local state codes.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-2016

2016-2017

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019-2020

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 15 15


Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 15 15

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 15 15


-C20- 2015 - 16

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Various Bldgs – Life Safety


PRO

JEC

T

2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020

2015-16 15 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 15 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 15

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes __ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request Ongoing_____ Approved ______ If not, why is the project now included? Result of local and State inspections. 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

Contractor Estimates 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No X_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Compliance with local and State inspections. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Local and State inspection recommendations would not be in compliance.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works

CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Various Buildings - Environmental Remediation

PROJECT LIFE: Permanent SCHEDULED START: Ongoing SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing

RANKING: A-11 NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Ongoing environmental testing and remediation.

JUSTIFICATION:

In the past funds were allocated for environmental remediation of asbestos, lead paint and other hazardous materials present in older City buildings. Most of the accessible friable asbestos material has been removed from City buildings. However, in order to make repairs and replacements of existing piping and equipment, access to floor and wall areas is necessary. Prior to the commencement of repair work in such areas, testing Is required and if positive, abatement must take place for environmental safety. The purpose of this would be to remove non-friable asbestos material from buildings as required. In addition, the EPA has enacted new remediation requirements for polychlorinated biphenyls which are present in caulking in old buildings. These funds will help to address PCB problems when encountered.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-2016

2016-2017

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019-2020

TOTAL



Construction 103 20 20 20 20 183



REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 113 20 20 20 20 193


-C22- 2015 - 16

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Various Buildings - Environmental Remediation


PRO

JEC

T

2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020

0 20 20 20 20

TOTAL 0 20 20 20 20

TOTAL 80

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan? Yes _X_ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request Ongoing_______ Approved $20,000___ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Environmental Contractor Estimate 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____ No X_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions ___________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. This request will address any unforeseen environmental concerns while maintenance and repair work is performed. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Should this project be deferred and maintenance repair work is required; repair costs could be quadrupled.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Bridges PROJECT TITLE: Perry Avenue Bridge over Norwalk River

PROJECT LIFE: 50 YEARS SCHEDULED START: 2014 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2017

RANKING: B-1 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT DESCRIPTION: Replace deteriorated bridge superstructure and Increase width of travelway between RR crossing and Main Avenue to add a dedicated left turn lane onto Main Avenue.

JUSTIFICATION: Federal Local Bridge Program (80%) Funded is going to provide a width of three lanes of bridge over the Norwalk River in order to maintain two lanes of traffic during construction. Due to the location of the CVS entrance/exit, The Metro North Railroad Crossing and the location of Main Avenue, insufficient room to queue traffic exists, causing a severely hazardous condition. This project will allow the City to increase the width of the travelway on Perry Avenue to add a third lane between the RR crossing and Main Avenue. Project Costs Total City Share@ 20% (For participating)

Design (Participating) $ 370,420 $74,084

Design (Non-Participating) $ 24,500 $24,500

Construction (Participating) $3,746,540 $749,318

Construction (Non-Participating) $ 546,792 $546,792

R.O.W. $ 175,000 $ 35,000

$4,863,310 $1,429,694 EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (000's)

PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL


Site Costs & Acquisition 74 74

Construction 850 294 1,144

Eqpt./Furnishings

Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,134 296 1,430

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 1,134 296 1,430


-C24- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Bridges PROJECT TITLE: Perry Avenue Bridge over Norwalk River

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes x No If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__190____ Approved _$_190_____ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Engineers Estimate

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ______________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

The current superstructure of the Perry Avenue Bridge is in poor condition. This project will replace the superstructure and provide the opportunity to correct the present condition at the RR Crossing which presents an extremely hazardous condition for traffic queuing at both Main Avenue and the Crossing signal. This project will allow for additional room to queue traffic, therefore promoting safety for the traveling public, as well as, rehabilitating of the Bridge.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded? This project is 80% State and Federal Funded, and is scheduled for advertisement for Bid in Spring 2014. The additional funds are required to provide the cities 20% share.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY : Bridges PROJECT TITLE: Glover Avenue Bridge Improvements

PROJECT LIFE: 20 Years SCHEDULED START: July 2011 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2017

RANKING: B-2 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Design and Construction for the removal of inadequate existing bridge railings and installation of new railings meeting current AASHTO/DOT requirements, widening of the bridge deck to provide 3 travel lanes and install a separate 8’wide pedestrian bridge.

JUSTIFICATION: Previous funding provided for replacement bridge railings. The current project will include the new railings, repair of the stone masonry arch and a pedestrian sidewalk bridge in order to properly maintain the structure, provide safe passage for pedestrians and provide three lanes of traffic for Glover Avenue at Main Avenue. The current two lane roadway is inadequate for traffic generated by the residential and commercial development in the area. The entire Glover Avenue Bridge was to be replaced by the new Route 7, Main Avenue, and Super 7 interchange. That project was terminated.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL



Construction 120 1,000 1,120

Eqpt./Furnishings

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 120 250 1,000 1,370

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 120 250 1,000 1,370


-C26- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Public Works CATEGORY: Bridges PROJECT TITLE: Glover Avenue Bridge Improvements

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes X No ____ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_120 ____ Approved $_120____ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

Engineers Estimate 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ______________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Existing railings presents a safety concern for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic using Glover Avenue. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?

Potential liability for City of Norwalk when a vehicle crashes through existing deficient rails and falls into the river with potential fatalities.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY : Bridges PROJECT TITLE: Perry Avenue Bridge over Silvermine

PROJECT LIFE: 50 Years SCHEDULED START: Current 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2017

RANKING: B-3 ___ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Repoint underside of existing stone arch bridge

JUSTIFICATION: Recent state bridge inspections indicated the underside of the Perry Avenue Stone Arch Bridge needs repointing. This work was not performed when the roadway improvements and bridge railings were installed in 2006. The work proposed will provide continued serviceability of this historic structure.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL



Construction

Eqpt./Furnishings

Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 30 300 330


-C28- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Public Works CATEGORY: Bridge PROJECT TITLE: Perry Avenue Bridge over Silvermine

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes X No ___ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $____ Approved $ _____ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

Engineers Estimate 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No __X _ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs _____________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ______________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. If this project does not move forward, with the increasing deterioration taking place on this bridge, there exists a potential for lowering of the load rating of the bridge and potential for closing of the roadway. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY : Bridges PROJECT TITLE: James Street Bridge Silvermine

PROJECT LIFE: 50 Years SCHEDULED START: Current SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2018

RANKING: B-4 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Final design effort for superstructure replacement of James Street Bridge over Silvermine River, R.O.W. Costs, construction, construction administration, and inspection of construction NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR.

JUSTIFICATION: The existing James Street Bridge was constructed in 1956 and is in a deteriorated condition. The new superstructure will be replaced to the same approximate dimensions, with a more aesthetically appealing railing system. This project will be funded at 80% Federal funding through the Federal Local Bridge Program. 20% of the overall cost is the City responsibility. Projected Costs Total City Share @ 20% Design (Participating) $ 226,000 $ 45,200 Construction (Participating) $1,950,000 $350,000 R.O.W. $ 300,000 $ 60,000 $2,476,000 $455,200


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-2020

TOTAL



Construction 295 295

Eqpt./Furnishings

Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 455 455


-C30- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Public Works CATEGORY: Bridges PROJECT TITLE: James Street Bridge Silvermine

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes X No __ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $195_ ____ Approved $_195__ _____ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

Engineers Estimate 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _X_ _ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ______________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. If project does not move forward, with increasing deterioration taking place, potential exists for lowering of the load rating for this bridge and eventually even the possibility for closure of the roadway. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?

NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Bridges PROJECT TITLE: General Bridge Repairs

PROJECT LIFE: 40- 50 years SCHEDULED START: JULY 2010 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 7/2015


DESCRIPTION: General bridge repairs to existing bridges including bridge railing repairs, concrete patch repairs, pointing of masonry, approach railing repairs and other miscellaneous repairs as needed. Funds also required to inspect city structures with spans less than 20 feet. NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR

JUSTIFICATION: The State of Connecticut, every two years, inspects all City Bridges with a span greater than 20 feet. Deficiencies are brought to the attention of the City following these inspections. These deficiencies must be repaired to allow for safe transport of vehicles and pedestrians. Example: West Cedar Street Bridge needs to have pointing work done on old masonry arch section as well as improving of scour countermeasures. Other work would include painting of metal railings such as those located at Klondike Park.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-15

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 65 65 65 195

Eqpt./Furnishings

Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 65 65 65 195

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 65 65 65 195


-C32- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Bridges PROJECT TITLE: General Bridge Repairs

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_65,000_ _ ____ Approved _$_65,000___ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Estimate of past expenditures 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _ X_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ______________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Improved safety for traveling public and promotes increased useful life of structures. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded? Potential for increased liability for City since State of Connecticut has identified deficiencies.

NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Bridges PROJECT TITLE: East Avenue Roadway / Bridge

PROJECT LIFE: 50 Years SCHEDULED START: JULY 2009 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: JULY 2018


DESCRIPTION: Widening of East Avenue from St. John Street to Rowan St. to accommodate 4 lanes of traffic. This project will also add sidewalks to both sides of the roadway below the bridge for improved safety for pedestrians as well as increasing vertical clearance below the bridge. NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR

JUSTIFICATION: The low vertical clearance and narrow width of the roadway below the East Avenue RR Bridge causes significant traffic delays on East avenue as well as increased potential for vehicular and pedestrian collisions. Presently truck traffic can not pass below the bridge causing trucks to take Fort Point St. as a route to south of the bridge. Turning traffic onto Fort Point also causes significant traffic impacts to East Avenue Traffic that need to be eliminated for improved safety in this corridor. The City will pay 100% Cost of Design Effort, 10% of R.O.W. costs. Federal and State will pay remainder of R.O.W. costs and 100% Construction Costs. Projected Costs Totals City Obligation Design Costs $ 433,000 $433000 R.O.W. $2,000,000 $200,000 $2,433,000 $633,000


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Eqpt./Furnishings

Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST


-C34- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Bridges PROJECT TITLE: East Avenue Roadway / Bridge

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_0_ _ ____ Approved _$ 0__ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Updated Engineers Estimate

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ______________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Will improve traffic flow and safety for both pedestrians and vehicles with this corridor. Project to be ready for bidding with State Bridge Projects and City will be able to take advantage of Federal and State funding for this project. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded? NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR


DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT TITLE: Fleet Replacement PROJECT LIFE: Ongoing SCHEDULED START: SCHEDULED COMPLETION:

RANKING: C1 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT DESCRIPTION: (See attached Fleet Replacement Plan) • Dump truck/snow plow (2) • Wood chipper, bandit • Ford F-550 dump truck • Trackless multi-use vehicle • Ford F-350 flatbed truck • Drainage investigation system attachments

JUSTIFICATION: • On-going replacement/rotation of snow plow trucks to maximize productivity and to minimize costs. • Replace a small, aging, under-powered, inefficient chipper; standardizing the chipper fleet • Replace a broken asphalt repair truck that is already out of service • Needed for more efficient sidewalk maintenance, particularly snow and ice removal • Replace an old, inefficient general purpose truck that must be taken out of service • Needed to allow crawl camera to operate efficiently in broken, collapsed and flowing pipes


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Furnishings Ongoing 770 790 966 883 440 3,849

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES Ongoing 770 790 966 883 440 3,849

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST Ongoing 770 790 966 883 440 3,849


-C36- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Public Works PROJECT TITLE Fleet Replacement 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes X No ___ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $____830,000_______ Approved _$805,000____ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Bids and quotations from equipment suppliers. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _X__ No __ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses __ ____________________ C. Additional Salary Costs __________________ No. of new positions ___________________ D. Additional operating expenses __________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Equipment replacement is needed to maintain City services for snow and ice removal, highway and drainage repairs, and tree management. See Justification section on Page 1.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded.

Increased maintenance costs, loss of productivity, dilution of City services, and increased liability associated with an aging fleet.

Num Amount Total Num Amount Total Num Amount Total Num Amount Total Num Amount Total Num Amount TotalDump truck 37,000 lb GVW snow/ice app 2 220,000$ 440,000$ 2 220,000$ 440,000$ 2 220,000$ 440,000$ 2 220,000$ 440,000$ 2 220,000$ 440,000$ 2 220,000$ 440,000$

Wood chipper, Bandit 1 75,000$ 75,000$ 1 75,000$ 75,000$

Ford F-550 dump truck 1 45,000$ 45,000$ 1 45,000$ 45,000$ 1 48,000$ 48,000$ Trackless multi-use vehicle 1 145,000$ 145,000$

Ford F-350 flatbed truck 1 40,000$ 40,000$ Drainage investigation system attachments 1 25,000$ 25,000$ Ford F-750 rack body truck 1 90,000$ 90,000$

Mack GU713 10-wheeler 1 165,000$ 165,000$ Midsize truck, Ford F-750/plow 1 138,000$ 138,000$ 1 138,000$ 138,000$

Pickup Ford F250 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 1 30,000$ 30,000$

Small packer 1 125,000$ 125,000$ Street sweeper, Elgin Pelican P 1 185,000$ 185,000$

Survey vehicle 1 25,000$ 25,000$ Traffic measurement vehicle 1 25,000$ 25,000$

Bucket loader 1 185,000$ 185,000$ Enclosed storm drainage camera truck 1 120,000$ 120,000$ Mower unit, tractor mount 2 35,000$ 70,000$

GPS replacement 1 75,000$ 75,000$ Water truck chassis, Mack GU712 1 120,000$ 120,000$

805,000$ 770,000$ 790,000$ 966,000$ 883,000$ 440,000$

Department of Public Works Fleet Replacment and Production Efficiency Plan

FY 2019-2020FY 2018-2019FY 2014-2015 Approved FY 2015-2016Equipment Description

FY 2016-2017 FY 2017-2018

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Mapping PROJECT TITLE: Drainage System Mapping

PROJECT LIFE: 5 years SCHEDULED START: 2012 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing

RANKING: D-1 x NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: This project is for completion of the storm drainage mapping as being required under the new MS-4 permitting. This information will be added to the City’s GIS system and available for departmental needs like asset management, storm water mapping, emergency preparedness, etc.

JUSTIFICATION: The Department is tasked with maintaining much of the City’s infrastructure including stormwater drainage. Knowledge of the location and condition of our infrastructure is critical in addressing emergencies such as oil spills or creating and developing infrastructure maintenance and replacement plans. Currently, the City’s records of these assets are incomplete and the digital inventory is the most expedient and least costly method of accurately obtaining the necessary data. Mapping of the storm drainage system is also required under MS-4 permit requirements. This information will also be used to offset the cost of survey work required for other capital projects.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design 250 60 60 60 60 60 550


Construction

Equip./Furnishings

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 250 60 60 60 60 60 550

REVENUE (Specify) - Sales

COST REDUCTIONS

NET COST 250 60 60 60 60 60 550


-C38- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Public Works CATEGORY: MAPPING PROJECT TITLE: Drainage System Mapping 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x_ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $ 250 _____ Approved $ 0__ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 2 interns at $14/hr for a total of 4000 hr/year $56,000 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes __x_ No _ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _____ ___ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ____ ________ C. Additional Salary Costs _________________ No. of new positions ___________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _Payback within 4 years in increased efficiencies 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Ability to reduce the need for survey on capital budget projects, increase efficiency, provides accurate representation of city during emergencies, etc.


The City has made a significant investment in its existing mapping. Without continued funding, the accuracy and effectiveness of the GIS deteriorates to a point where its value to the City is significantly decreased.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Pavement Programs PROJECT TITLE: Pavement Management Program

PROJECT LIFE: 20+ Years SCHEDULED START: ONGOING SCHEDULED COMPLETION: ONGOING

RANKING: E-1 NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: The Pavement Management program is intended to begin improving the condition of streets and roads throughout the City, as measured by the average Pavement Condition Index (PCI).

JUSTIFICATION: At recent funding levels, the average PCI of streets and roads in the City has begun to stabilize. Analysis shows that an annual investment of $6 million is required to begin increasing, and sustaining, the average PCI across the City. At lower funding levels, the average PCI will decline. Maintaining the current average PCI is not sufficient to correct many streets that are in extremely poor condition. DPW recommends an annual budget of $6M per year, not only to maintain the average PCI, but to improve the condition of some of worst condition streets in Norwalk. In the 2014 Pavement Management Program over $1,000,000 was spent on replacement sidewalk construction and ADA compliance for Handicap Access Ramps to sidewalks. SIDEWALK CATEGORY REQUEST has been increased to $500,000.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design Ongoing 300 300 300 300 300 1,500


Construction 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 26,250


Other/Contingency Ongoing 450 450 450 450 450 2,250

TOTAL EXPENDITURES Ongoing 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 30,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST Ongoing 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 30,000


-C40- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Pavement Programs PROJECT TITLE: Pavement Management Program

Paving Management Program _______FY 2015-16 __________ ___ __FY 2016-17_____________________ ______ _ Admiral Lane Forbell Drive Mott Avenue Splitrock Road Alden Avenue Cutrone Road Kellee Court Purdy Road East Allview Avenue Garfield Street New Street Stonybrook Road Appletree Lane Dixie Lane Kellee Drive Rebel Lane Arbor Drive Garner Street. North Taylor Ave Summitt Avenue Arbor Court Dock Road Knollwood Road Roland Avenue Bedford Avenue Glover Avenue Oakfield Road Tally Drive Arlington Street East Beach Drive Larsen Street Rudolf Lane Bow End Road Golden Hill Street Old Trolley Way Taylor Avenue Arrowhead Court Edgewood Street Leonard Street Short Street Boxwood Road Harrison Avenue Outlook Drive Toilsome Avenue Auburn Street Elliott Street Louise Street South Beach Drive Broadview Terrace Harvard Street Quaker Road Trolley Place Barbara Drive Esquire Road Lycett Court Southwind Drive Brooklawn Avenue Hazel Street Rampart Road Union Park Bartlett Manor Folwell Road Maplewood Terrace Sunlit Drive Burritt Avenue Highbrook Road Reed Street Water Street Blue Mountain Road Forbell Drive Marlin Drive Tulip Tree Road Byington Place Hoyt Street Richlee Road West Avenue Boulder Circle Glen Avenue May Drive Twin Ledge Road Calf Pasture Beach Imperial Drive Rickey Lane West Couch Street Buckthorn Road Greenfield Road Mayflower Road Vanderbilt Avenue Circle Road Jersey Lane Robbins Square So. West Norwalk Road Buttery Road Heather Lane Michael Street Weatherly Avenue Clara Drive Karen Drive Rockridge Drive Woodward Avenue Cavanaugh Street Henry Street Midwood Road Yew Street College Street Longshore Avenue Rolling Lane Center Avenue Howard Avenue Novak Street Couch Street Marvin Street (EB) Roscoe Street Center Avenue Ext. Hudson Street Nutmeg Place Cranbury Woods Rd Mechanic Street Ryan Avenue Cindy Lane Indiana Place Obrien Street Dairy Farm Court Mill Brook Drive Scribner Avenue Covewood Drive Inwood Road Parallel Street Dairy Farm Road Mohawk Drive Sleepy Hollow Dr. Crescent Beach Road Jean Avenue Priscilla Road

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan? Yes _X__ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request __$6,000,000____ ______ Approved _$5,000,000_____ If not, why is the project now included?

2. How was your cost estimate derived? In depth GIS analysis using data derived by consulting engineering and estimates based on historical costs, extent of reconstruction required and continued monitoring of each street’s Pavement Condition Index (PCI).

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _X__ No __ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses Over time will decrease repair and maintenance cost and extend useful equipment life. C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions ___________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________

4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. The City’s streets are constantly under distress. Without constant refurbishment and maintenance of the City’s infrastructure, the overall condition of the City’s streets will decline exponentially. The amount of funding requested is to maintain or improve the current PCI.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Without funding preventative maintenance techniques, future methods of repair will be more expensive and the overall condition (PCI) of the City’s streets will decline. This would expose the City to increased costs, complaints and liability claims.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Pavement Programs PROJECT TITLE: City Hall Parking Facility

Rehabilitation

PROJECT LIFE: 20+ years SCHEDULED START: April 2012 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2013

RANKING: E-2 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Project will include repaving the city hall parking lot, miscellaneous curb and sidewalk repairs.

JUSTIFICATION: Project will provide for the maintenance of the 25-year-old current city hall driveways, parking lots, and repair curbs and sidewalks walks for ADA Compliance.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design In-house



Eqpt./Furnishings


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 250 250


-C42- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Pavement Programs PROJECT TITLE: City Hall Parking Facility Rehabilitation

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes x_ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__ 220,000_ ____ Approved _$___ 0_____ If not, why is the project now included? Project was previously identified in the Building management category. 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Estimate of past expenditures 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No x_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

The parking lot needs to be maintained.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?

Existing parking lot will continue to deteriorate, leading to increased repair costs.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Pavement Programs PROJECT TITLE: Norwalk River Valley Trail– Phase 2

PROJECT LIFE: 25 years SCHEDULED START: 2012 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2015

RANKING: E-3 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Construction costs for piece of trail between Union Park and New Canaan Avenue.

JUSTIFICATION: This portion will enable pedestrians and bicyclists to use the existing trail from Broad Street to the Maritime Aquarium and eventually to Long Island Sound. ConnDOT has proposed to include construction of another phase from Perry Avenue to Grist Mill Road as part of the Merritt Parkway interchange project. The design funds for this section of the trail have been secured through the FTA and funds have been secured from CTDEP to regionally provide a concept plan to extend trail to Danbury. Requested funding is for City’s matching source of construction funding. Future funding requests for neighborhood spurs to trail.


PRIOR YEAR

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design



Eqpt./Furnishings

Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 750 1,500 2,250

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 750 1,500 2,250


-C44- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Pavement Programs PROJECT TITLE: Norwalk River Valley Trail – Phase 2

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes x_ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_0_ ____ Approved _$__0_ _____ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Estimated from previous construction costs. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ______________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

This project provides an alternative form of transportation and additional recreational opportunity for the citizens of Norwalk. This has been part of the Master Plan of Development for Norwalk since the early 1990s.


Less alternative forms of transportation and decreased recreational activities for residents.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Pavement Programs PROJECT TITLE: Washington Street Reconstruction

PROJECT LIFE: 20+ years SCHEDULED START: August 2014 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2014

RANKING: E-4 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: This project provides for the reconstruction of Washington Street from Water St. to So. Main Street. Key aspects of the work include the removal and reconstruction of the brick paver crosswalks in 4 locations with the updated design that includes granite leading edge restraints to prevent paver movement. Sidewalk repairs will be made as needed. NO REQUESTS THIS FISCAL YEAR

JUSTIFICATION: The original brick paver crosswalks were installed in the 1980’s and have needed spot repairs. They have now degraded to the point where settlement and other defects require complete removal and reconstruction. The updated design for the crosswalks include flush granite curb at edge leading edge to lock the pavers in place. The road will be milled and overlaid with bituminous concrete pavement. Crosswalk locations will also receive new ADA Compliant Handicap Ramps. Estimated Construction Costs: Mill & Overlay Pavement - $72,000 ADA Handicap Ramps - $10,000 Brick Pavers Crosswalks - $74,000 Granite Curb, Crosswalk Edge - $22,000 Misc Sidewalk Repair - $22,000 $200,000


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design In-house



Eqpt./Furnishings


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 200 200


-C46- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Pavement Programs PROJECT TITLE: Washington Street Reconstruction

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _ No _ x_ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__ ____ Approved _$___ _____ If not, why is the project now included? Project was previously identified in the Building management category. 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Estimate of past expenditures 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No x_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________

4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. This section of roadway from Water Street to So. Main Street is an extremely active pedestrian area with numerous restaurants a, shops and residencies. The crosswalks have deteriorated to the point that they will present a liability issue for the city.


In addition to the obvious defects in the roadway and crosswalks, the condition of the road detracts from the area in general.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curb PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalk and Curbing – Road Paving

PROJECT LIFE: 20 Years SCHEDULED START: 2012 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing

RANKING: F-1 NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: This project will complement the Pavement Management Program, providing funding to install/replace curbing necessary for adequate roadway drainage and replace deteriorated sidewalks on roads that are in the Pavement Program. Urban roadways with concrete curb and sidewalk are particularly expensive.

JUSTIFICATION: The replacement of curbs and sidewalks along roadways in the Pavement Management Program is required to ensure adequate drainage and complete the streetscape improvements, especially on urban roadways with deteriorated concrete curb and sidewalk. On many streets the curb is almost flush with the pavement encouraging parking on the sidewalk. Proper curbs are also required to control storm runoff.

ADA regulations require the installation of compliant handicap ramps at all intersections any time a road is paved. These concrete ramps contribute to the increased costs involved in our programs. Failure to address these issues exposes the City to litigation.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 500 500 500 500 500 2,500


Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 500 500 500 500 500 2,500

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 500 500 500 500 500 2,500


-C48- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curbs PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalks and Curbing – Road Paving

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan? Yes _X__ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ________ Approved _____________ If not, why is the project now included?

2. How was your cost estimate derived? Estimate from ongoing program costs.

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____ No X_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions ___________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________

4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Enhance safety for pedestrian transportation and lessen liability for City. Replacement of sidewalk sections is often required on roads scheduled for re-paving, where adjustments to grade are needed or curb reveal has been lost (impacting drainage).


Potential for increased liability to City as sidewalk trips and falls constitute one of the most common claims against the City. Also, in some instances, curbing must be altered (and consequently the sidewalk) to establish an appropriate layout of a roadway, prior to it being re-paved.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curb PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalk and Curbs – Citywide


RANKING: F-2 X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION:

Construction of sidewalks where none exist and repair of existing sidewalks.

JUSTIFICATION:

To enable pedestrian mobility and create a healthier and safer lifestyle. The City has 140 miles of sidewalk. The proposed funding will provide for only the most critical of sidewalk repairs and no footpath work. Work has been done in synch with road paving. Funds will assist in implementing the plan working with Planning & Zoning. In 2013 over $715,000 was spent on replacement sidewalks and ADA Compliance Handicap Ramps at roadway intersections.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,500


Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,500

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,500


-C50- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curbs PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalks and Curbing – Citywide

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan? Yes _X__ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request __$400,000______ ______ Approved _$350,000_______ If not, why is the project now included?


3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____ No X_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions ___________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Enhance safety for pedestrian transportation and lessen liability for City. Replacement of sidewalk sections is often required on roads scheduled for re-paving, where adjustments to grade are needed or curb reveal has been lost (impacting drainage).


Potential for increased liability to City as sidewalk trips and falls constitute one of the most common claims against the City. Also, in some instances, curbing must be altered (and consequently the sidewalk) to establish an appropriate layout of a roadway, prior to it being re-paved.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curb PROJECT TITLE: Footpath Replacement


RANKING: F-3 X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION:

Repair of existing footpaths.

JUSTIFICATION:

To enable pedestrian mobility and create a healthier and safer lifestyle. The City has 45 miles of footpath in addition to its 140 miles of sidewalk. The proposed funding will provide for only the most critical footpath work.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 100 100 100 100 100 500



REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 100 100 100 100 100 500


-C52- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curbs PROJECT TITLE: Footpath Replacement

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan? Yes _ __ No _x_ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ____$ 0__ ______ Approved _$ 0__________ If not, why is the project now included? Some footpaths have recently been discovered to need attention.




Enhance safety for pedestrian transportation and lessen liability for City.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Potential for increased liability to City as trips and falls constitute one of the most common claims against the City.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curb PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalks and Curbs – City Buildings/Property


RANKING: F- 4 X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION:

Construction of sidewalks where none exist and repair of existing sidewalks at City facilities. Projects could include sidewalks at Mill Hill.

JUSTIFICATION:

To enable pedestrian mobility and create a healthier and safer lifestyle. The City has 140 miles of sidewalk. The proposed funding will provide for only the most critical of sidewalk repairs at City facilities.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction Ongoing 28 50 50 128


Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES Ongoing 28 50 50 128

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST Ongoing 28 50 50 128


-C54- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curbs PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalks and Curbing – City Buildings/Property

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan? Yes _ X__ No _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request 50______ Approved ___0____ If not, why is the project now included? The Department has determined the occasional need to repair the sidewalks and curbs associated with City Buildings.




Enhance safety for pedestrian transportation and lessen liability for City.


Potential for an increased liability to the City as sidewalk trips and falls constitute on of the most common claims against the City.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Stormwater Management PROJECT TITLE: General Drainage


RANKING: G-1 X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: This project entails the replacement, repair and construction of new local drainage as needed in conjunction with the Pavement Management Program.

JUSTIFICATION: Repair or installation of minor to mid-sized drainage systems and culvert cleaning as needed during the year. Drainage improvements are often required on roads scheduled for re-paving and there are several potential drainage improvements throughout the City that have been investigated and estimated.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction Ongoing 500 500 500 500 500 2,500


Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES Ongoing 500 500 500 500 500 2,500

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST Ongoing 500 500 500 500 500 2,500


-C56- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Stormwater Management PROJECT TITLE: General Drainage

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan? Yes _X__ No ____ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request __$400,000______ ______ Approved _$250,000_______ If not, why is the project now included?

2. How was your cost estimate derived? Estimate from ongoing program costs and proposed plans.

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____ No X_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions ___________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________


There are numerous areas of the City that require drainage improvements that are relatively small in nature, that can be rectified quickly and efficiently through this program.


Continued flooding problems and destruction to personal property. Flooding also is a hazard to the traveling public.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Stormwater Management PROJECT TITLE: Honeysuckle-Daphne Friendly Storm Drainage Improvements


RANKING: G-2 X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Implementation of storm water improvements to redirect storm drainage runoff from Honeysuckle Drive that currently goes into the Saddle Road storm drainage system towards Daphne Drive and upgrade the existing storm drainage system from Daphne Drive and on Friendly Road, to the outlet at Friendly Pond.

JUSTIFICATION: Significant flooding has been experienced in this area on Saddle Road on a frequent recurring basis. This is the recommended solution in the 2013 Norwalk Drainage Study that will result in reduced flood frequency and flood levels in this area of the City.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL






REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 350 1,000 1,350


-C58- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Stormwater Management PROJECT TITLE: General Drainage

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan? Yes _ __ No _X___ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $0 Approved $0 If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Preliminary Design Plans by Consultant

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____ No X_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions ___________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________


The residents of the area have requested this project.


Further flooding of property and homes .

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Storm Water PROJECT TITLE: Watercourse Maintenance

PROJECT LIFE: 15 years SCHEDULED START: Ongoing SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing

RANKING: G-3 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Removal of sediment, trees and other materials from City watercourses, as well as the installation of various storm drainage best management practices. Potential locations include Metro North Culverts, North Taylor Avenue, Oak Hills to Gillies Lane, Grumman Avenue at Newtown Avenue, along with other point discharge locations. This would also include work at locations along Bettts Pond Brook, Lloyd Road, the Lawrence Street Pump Station Area Watershed, Park Hill Avenue and Fodor Farm as recommended in the 2013 Norwalk Drainage Study.

JUSTIFICATION: Most City watercourses that are integral parts of the City storm drainage system are severely blocked with debris and sediment that must be removed to help alleviate flooding potential. Much of the sediment is the result of years of road sanding operations that have been replaced with alternate methods. The Department has prepared an updated storm drainage system evaluation of problem areas identified throughout the City (The 2013 Norwalk Drainage Study). This study has developed storm drainage improvement recommendations to alleviate flooding in the Betts Brook area, Oak Hills area, Lloyd Road area, the Lawrence Street Pump Station area watershed, Park Hill Avenue area and the Fodor Farm area.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design 100 100 100 100 400


Construction ongoing 1,400 900 900 900 4,100

Eqpt./Furnishings

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES Ongoing 1,500 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,500

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST ongoing 1,500 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,500


-C60- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Storm Water PROJECT TITLE: Watercourse Maintenance

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes_x_ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_1,000,000__ Approved _$__0 _____ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Planning estimate 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ______________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

To alleviate flooding


Increased flooding

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Storm Water PROJECT TITLE: Stormwater Quality Management


RANKING: G-4 NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: This project is to continue and maintain the progress the City has made in improving the condition of the sound and its contributing rivers, streams and brooks. This project is for the implementation of several water quality improvements such as the replacement of defunct storm water filters, cleaning of water quality structures, and the installation of water-quality structures at newly selected locations, etc. Funds would also be used for public education, participation in the FEMA CMS program which may entitle residents to reduced flood insurance.

JUSTIFICATION: The Department in cooperation with the Health Department and HW/RW have uncovered and corrected several water quality issues, including correcting bacterial problems at Calf Pasture Beach, Woodward Avenue and are currently working on a couple of others. This along with the regular monitoring of the Norwalk, Silvermine and Five Mile River by HW/RW have lead to significant water quality improvements but many more are still required. These funds are also needed to comply with new MS4 General Permit requirements. .


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equip./Furnishings

Other/Contingency 500 200 200 200 1,100

500 200 200 200 1,100


COST REDUCTIONS

NET COST 500 200 200 200 1,100


-C62- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Public Works CATEGORY: Storm Water PROJECT TITLE: Stormwater Quality Management 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _ _ No _X_ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $______ Approved $ 0__ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Quotes for vendors 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes __x_ No _ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _____ ___ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ____ ________ C. Additional Salary Costs _________________ No. of new positions ___________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

This project is required to help maintain and improve water quality in the town’s rivers, streams and harbors,and to meet requirements of the pending new MS4 General Permit requirements.


Continued impaired water quality. Violation of permit

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Storm Water PROJECT TITLE: Water Street Outlet Maintenance


RANKING: G-5 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Dredging and maintenance of existing drainage outlets at several locations on Water Street. NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR

JUSTIFICATION: As part of the City’s easement agreement with various property owner’s on Water Street, the City is responsible for maintain the drainage outfalls and the water channels depths. Located at Norwest Marine and Total Marine. Outfalls at both these locations were installed in 1920-1980’s and require dredging maintenance. This was last done in 2008 and earlier in 1997. Survey performed indicates dredging on required again at these locations.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design



Eqpt./Furnishings

Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 300 300 600


-C64- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Storm Water PROJECT TITLE: Water Street Outlet Maintenance

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes_X__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_250,000__ ____ Approved _$_0_ _ _____ If not, why is the project now included? To address easement requirements. 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Estimate and previous maintenance dredging contracts. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ____ ________________


The City is obligated by easement to maintain the outlet area and dredge as necessary

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded? The City could be found in violation of easement obligations. NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Storm Water PROJECT TITLE: Keeler Brook Storm Water Improvements

PROJECT LIFE: 40 years SCHEDULED START: SCHEDULED COMPLETION:

RANKING: G-6 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: The design and construction of improvements recommended for Keeler Brook. Future project to include existing storm sewer improvements in watershed. NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR

JUSTIFICATION: The Keeler Brook drainage study required as part of the Connecticut DEP order for the Keeler Brook watershed has identified several improvements needed for the watercourse. Improvements to the storm water collection system to handle the peak flows associated with the urbanized nature of the area are also necessary to prevent it from entering the sanitary sewer system. The brook often floods local residents and streets including Gilly’s Lane, Ledgebrook Drive, West Cedar Street, Scribner Avenue and Route 1. Models have shown that the recurrence interval of flooding is two years.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL



Construction 1,000 4,000 2,000 7,000


Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,620 4,000 2,000 7,620

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 1,620 4,000 2,000 7,620


-C66- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Storm Water PROJECT TITLE: Keeler Brook Storm Water Improvements

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x_ No ___ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_1,000,000_____ Approved $__0______

If not, why is the project now included?

2. How was your cost estimate derived? Scope and price proposal from engineering firm.

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______0__________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______0__________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______0___________ No. of new positions 0_________ D. Additional operating expenses ______0__________ Net effect on Operating Budget _________________

4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. This project would address serious recurring flooding on several roads in the Keeler Brook area and address a DEP order. Additional benefits include better and safer travel on local roads.


Additional flooding in the area could occur before a plan could be developed to help mitigate flooding in the Keeler Brook area. Possible DEP orders and sanctions. Matching funds will be required for federal funds authorized.

NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Storm Water PROJECT TITLE: Culvert Rehabilitation


RANKING: G-7 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Structural lining of 36” Storm Drain on Clinton Avenue. Structural lining of 700’ of Corrugated Metal pipe carrying a portion of the Indian River. NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR

JUSTIFICATION: FY 2012-13 Project is for the structural lining of the 36’ corrugated metal Storm Drain on Clinton Avenue which has failed and creates road collapse during intense rainfalls. This work will be coordinated with drainage improvements on Connecticut Avenue by CTDOT. FY 2015-16 Project is to line Corrugated Metal pipe which is deteriorating and releasing iron oxide bacteria into Indian River. The structural integrity of the pipe is compromised and will eventually collapse. There exists the possibility of a formal DEP order to repair.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design




Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 400 400


-C68- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Storm Water PROJECT TITLE: Culvert Rehabilitation

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes x_ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__0______ Approved _$_0____ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimate. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ______________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Collapse of this pipe could result inn flooding of neighborhood. A strong potential exists for a DEP order to investigate and correct situation.


Continued release of iron oxide bacteria and potential flooding of neighborhood should pipe collapse. NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Traffic PROJECT TITLE: Traffic Signals at Various Locations


RANKING: H-1 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Replacement of obsolete traffic signals, some in excess of 30 years old, such as France @ Cannon, Gregory @ First, Rowayton @ Cudlipp, Meadow Street @ Fire House, First @ Sycamore, Newtown @ Allen Road, Rowayton @ Wilson, West Avenue @ Garner, West Ave Pedestrian Crossing (20 West Avenue), Wall Street at Isaac and Wall Street @ Pedestrian Crossing (Globe Theater). Funds are also required to replace existing Opticom Priority Control units. Update controllers and communication on New Canaan Avenue.

JUSTIFICATION: These signals and or equipment are beyond the useful life span and require replacement. This part of a continuing program to replace obsolete signals across the City so to better manage traffic flows. Approximately 10 existing opticom units need to be replaced at various locations need to be replaced. Provide battery back-up at critical intersection. Six(6) Traffic Signal Systems at Wall Street @ Main, Wall Street @ Commerce, Van Zant Street @ Osborne, Van Zant Street @ Fire House, Ward Street @ Freese Court and Fox Run @ Little Brook/Red Coat will be advertised for bid in March 2013. This Signal Project will utilize the entire funding available in the Traffic Signal Capital Accounts. Additional traffic signal locations that need upgrade are listed under Project Description at left.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 250 250 250 250 250 1,250



REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 250 250 250 250 250 1,250


-C70- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Traffic PROJECT TITLE: Traffic Signals at Various Locations

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan? Yes _x No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $___250,000____ ______ Approved $_____250,000__ If not, why is the project now included?

2. How was your cost estimate derived? Engineer estimate based on recent pricing

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _____________________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _____________________________ C. Additional Salary Costs _____________________________ No. of new positions ___________ D. Additional operating expenses _____________________________ _____________________________


The City has several signals that are over 30 years old and require replacement.


The signals can have the potential to fail and cause injury due to age and condition.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Traffic PROJECT TITLE: Pavement Markings and Signage

PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION:

RANKING: H-2 x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Pavement markings have been budgeted within the Pavement Management Program. This project is being developed to encompass all pavement markings and signage along city roadways. This item will include normal centerline, shoulder, turn arrows, stop bars and will begin the implementation of a bike lane network for the city.

JUSTIFICATION: All city streets that require pavement markings, whether centerline, shoulder, turn arrows or stop bars need to have these markings refreshed periodically. The reflectivity of the markings plays a significant role in vehicle safety Public Works has been working with the Mayor’ Task Force for Pedestrian and Bicycles and will evaluate candidate streets for bike lanes for roads in the Pavement Management Program. Roads that are in good condition to receive pavement markings can also be considered in the program.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design



Eqpt./Furnishings

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 300 200 200 700

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 200 200 200 700


-C72- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Traffic PROJECT TITLE: Pavement Marking and Signage

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes No _ _x If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__0______ Approved _$_0____ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimate. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ______________________

4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Pavement markings must be maintained on city roadways on a periodic program Proposed bicycle lanes include several addition line striping in addition to traditional road centerline and shoulder


Pavement markings are essential for vehicle guidance in limited visibility conditions. Proper installation of bike lanes will make the roadways safer for both motorists and bikers.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Traffic PROJECT TITLE: Incident Management System

PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing

RANKING: H-3 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: This project will replace our older traffic cameras and add some additional cameras to better monitor traffic and manage traffic incidents on major traffic corridors in the City. This project will also incorporate road weather sensors and provide battery back-up power for critical intersections. Purchase and installation of variable message signs (VMS) at selected locations.

JUSTIFICATION: Several of our traffic cameras have reached the end of their life-span (over 15 years old) and need to be replaced. There are several critical intersections in the City that need back-up power to maintain safe traffic operations should there be some type of power failure. The road sensors would provide our highway department with accurate weather information to allow them to prepare the most economical response to ice and snow conditions. The VMS would advise travelers of existing and upcoming traffic projects, events, accidents, etc. so they could plan their travel routes accordingly. All of this information would be feedback to our existing traffic management software and to the web at a future date.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL



Construction 750 750 100 100 1,700



REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 250 750 750 100 100 1,950


-C74- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Traffic PROJECT TITLE: Incident Management System

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan? Yes _ No X_ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_______ Approved $_________ If not, why is the project now included? To address aging equipment

2. How was your cost estimate derived? Engineer estimate based on recent pricing

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _____________________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _____________________________ C. Additional Salary Costs _____________________________ No. of new positions ____________ D. Additional operating expenses _____________________________ ________________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Original traffic cameras need to be replaced, over 15 years old. Backup power at key intersections will allow normal signal operation during power failure. Traffic incidents on I-95 that shift traffic to Route 1 and other local roads can be monitored and the best detour route can be implemented.

5, What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded? Older cameras systems will fail, the lack of backup power at key intersections will continue to aggravate traffic conditions. Proper detour of traffic due to incidents that close roadways will reduce congestion along the major corridors.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Traffic PROJECT TITLE: Transportation Management Plan Implementation


RANKING: H-4 x NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: This project is for the design and implementation of recommended intersection and roadway improvements made in the Norwalk Comprehensive Transportation Management Plans (TMP). Funds would be used to design and construct improvements at selected intersections and road corridors. Projects would be phased over several years Possible roadways include Fairfield Ave, Washington St, West Rocks Road, Calf Pasture Beach Road and East Avenue. Possible intersections include West at Belden/Mott, Highland at Soundview, Flax Hill at Richards, Flax Hill at Taylor, Murray at Newtown. Additional details can be found in the TMP. NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR

JUSTIFICATION: The City has or is just completing several plans including the Pedestrian and Bike plan, the Connectivity Study and the Norwalk Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan (TMP). Several recommendations were made as the result of public and stakeholder meetings and workshops. This project would allow for the implementation of many of these projects to achieve a better and more complete street. In addition, the projects would be designed to take advantage of the City new traffic communication system.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design 200 120 300 620


Construction 1,000 1,200 1,500 500 500 4,700

Equip./Furnishings

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,200 1,320 1,800 500 500 5,320


COST REDUCTIONS

NET COST 1,200 1;320 1,800 500 500 5,320


-C76- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Public Works CATEGORY: Traffic PROJECT TITLE: Transportation Master Plan Implementation 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x_ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $ 400,000_____ Approved $ 200,000__ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost projections developed from previous construction projections. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes __x_ No _ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _____ ___ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ____ ________ C. Additional Salary Costs _________________ No. of new positions ___________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

There is a growing request from the public to better a good and effective yet complete transportation system. These projects would help to address those concerns.


The current economy permits project like this to be built economically and rapidly allowing the public to appreciate the improvements sooner. Delays in funding this project until a later date could possible result in much higher construction costs. In addition, by having designs available, the City may be able to take advantage of some undesignated federal construction funding.


DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Trees PROJECT TITLE: City-wide Tree Planting Program

PROJECT LIFE: 40- 50 years SCHEDULED START: SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing

RANKING: I-1 X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Replacement of removed trees or planting of trees in areas lacking trees.

JUSTIFICATION: Trees provide social, community, environmental and economic benefit to a community. They increase quality of life for residents of the community. Funds would help the City maintain its status as a Tree City. These funds also helped secure Norwalk 1st place nation-wide as winner of the Home Depot Foundation’s Community Tree Award for Small Communities in 2006. Will also enable to maintain its long standing recognition as a “Tree City” by the Arbor Day Foundation. Increased funding needed to more promptly replace the hundreds of trees lost to weather in recent years.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 50 60 60 60 60 60 350

Eqpt./Furnishings


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 50 60 60 60 60 60 350


-C78- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Trees PROJECT ITLE: City–wide Tree Planting Program

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes x No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__50,000 _ ____ Approved _$__50,000_ _____ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ______________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. To improve quality of life

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded? Decreased quality of life and urban warming

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: FHWA Match PROJECT TITLE: FHWA Matching Funds


RANKING: J-1 NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: FHWA through CTDOT and SWRPA, make funds available annually through various programs to cover studies, ROW acquisition and design and construction costs for roadway and other transportation-related projects that occur on collector or higher functionally- classified streets. Most of these programs require the community provide a specified percentage of project costs as a match. Projects for consideration would include traffic signal upgrades, road improvements suggested by the Norwalk Comprehensive TMP and ITS projects. NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR

JUSTIFICATION: Having these funds available, the City may be able to take advantage of funds that are not-appropriated in a specific year due to project delays, etc. In addition, these funds could be identified as available when submitting applications for funding. Since CTDOT irregularly issues requests for projects, these projects can’t always be identified in capital requests, even though the State requires a commitment of money. By having funds available, the City is able to submit its application.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equip./Furnishings

Other/Contingency Ongoing 250 250 500

TOTAL EXPENDITURES Ongoing 250 250 500


COST REDUCTIONS

NET COST Ongoing 250 250 500


-C80- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Public Works CATEGORY: SAFETEALU Match PROJECT TITLE: FHWA Matching Funds 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x_ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_250,000____ Approved $ 0__ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Quotes for vendors 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes __x_ No _ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _____ ___ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ____ ________ C. Additional Salary Costs _________________ No. of new positions _______________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project

. This project would allow the City to take full -advantage of federal grants, sometimes being reimbursed 80cents on each dollar invested.


Potential loss of federal reimbursement for needed City projects.


2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: SAFETEA-LU Match PROJECT TITLE: Safe Routes to Schools

PROJECT LIFE: 20 years SCHEDULED START: ONGOING SCHEDULED COMPLETION: ONGOING

RANKING: J-2 X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: The City is prepared to submit a project to ConnDOT for construction funding in 2010 under the SAFETEA-LU SRTS program. This item is to supplement any federal funding received. NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR

JUSTIFICATION: The City is eligible for 100% federal funding for the construction of improvements under the SAFETEALU- SRTS program that encourage students in Grade K-8 to walk and bike to school as opposed to other transportation alternatives. Currently, only $1.3M is available state-wide annually for this program thus some City funds may be needed to fully implement a project. The City has targeted several possible projects for future funding including Gregory Blvd/Calf Pasture Beach Road (bikeway and sidewalks), Stuart Avenue/Fillow Street Area (sidewalks), Silvermine School Area (sidewalks) and Highland Avenue (sidewalks and bikeway).


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design




Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 200 200


-C82- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: SAFETEA-LU Match PROJECT TITLE: Safe Routes to Schools

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes x_ No __

If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $___200,000 _ Approved _$_ 0_____ If not, why is the project now included?

2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimate history

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ______________________

4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. A set amount of funds are dedicated to the region for improvements to encourage walking or biking to K-8. Although projects are 100% federally and state funded, additional funds may be needed to supplement or maintain project scope


A lost opportunity to obtain federal and state funds for most of the total project cost.


2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Special Projects PROJECT TITLE: Transfer Station Compactor

Replacements


RANKING: K-1 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Transfer Station Repairs: 2 of 3 Municipal Solid Waste Compactors were replaced in FY14-15. This request is for final unit.

JUSTIFICATION: Replacement of 2 of the 3 compactors at the Transfer Station was completed. The compactors are original equipment installed in 1982. The Transfer Station is a vital facility for the disposal of municipal solid waste and is the location of the resident recycling center. This funding is to replace the final compactor.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Eqpt./Furnishings 276 140 416

Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 276 140 416

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 276 140 416


-C84- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Public Works CATEGORY: Special Projects PROJECT TITLE: Transfer Station Capital Improvements

1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x No _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_____276__ ____ Approved _$__276______ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimate using data from replacement of lower scale in Feb 2011. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ______________________ No. of new positions ____________________ D. Additional operating expenses ______________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ______________________


The Transfer Station provides a vital service to citizens for the disposal and recycling of their waste. The waste compactors must be in proper condition to process the quantity of municipal solid waste delivered to the Station.


Without compactors the facility cannot process the tonnage of municipal solid waste that is disposed of in the City of Norwalk.


DEPARTMENT: Parking Authority

PROJECT TITLE

2015-16 REQUEST

2016-17 REQUEST

2017-18 REQUEST

2018-19 REQUEST

2019-20 REQUEST

1. Parking Facilities 747 747 747 747

2. Revenue Control/Smartparking 200 300 150 150

3.

4.

5.

6. 7.

8. 9.

10.

11.

12. 13.

14.

15.

16. 17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

TOTAL 947 1,047 897 897

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Parking Authority PROJECT TITLE: Parking Facilities PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: FY 2017 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing

RANKING: 1 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Parking facility upgrades and repairs as recommended by the 2013 facility assessment plan. NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR.

JUSTIFICATION: Capital repairs and security services necessary to continue to maintain the structural and working integrity of the parking facilities.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 5,257 747 747 747 747 8,245


Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,257 747 747 747 747 8,245

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 5,257 747 747 747 747 8,245

CAPITAL BUDGET D-1

D-2 2014-2015

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Parking Authority PROJECT TITLE: Parking Facilities 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $______________________ Approved _$_______________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Engineering Estimates. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses __debt service______________ Net effect on Operating Budget 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. To provide a safe environment for parkers and to extend the useful life of the parking facilities as important city assets and to ensure structural And working integrity, continued public access and availability. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Unmet structural repairs will further deteriorate the building and incur potential liability and safety concerns. And higher maintenance costs.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Parking Authority PROJECT TITLE: Revenue Control/SmartParking PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: FY 2016 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: FY 2018

RANKING: 2 X_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Upgrade and replace revenue control equipment and technology system wide as recommended in the 2013 SmartParking Technology Plan. NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR.

JUSTIFICATION: Replace obsolete revenue control equipment and update technology in order to provide enhanced customer service coordinated wayfinding functionality and decreased drive time, real time parking availability via smartphone and vehicle applications, real time occupancy analytics, improved audit function, increased compliance, efficient and effective productivity.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Furnishings 100 200 300 150 150 900

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 100 200 300 150 150 900

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 100 200 300 150 150 900

CAPITAL BUDGET D-3

D-4 2014-2015

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Parking Authority PROJECT TITLE: Revenue Control/SmartParking 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $______________________ Approved _$_______________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Vendor Estimates. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _X__ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _____X____________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses __debt service______________ Net effect on Operating Budget 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Provide enhanced customer service through technology and updated equipment as well as more efficient, effective productivity. Provides real Time occupancy and demand data to enable improved parking policy and rate analysis. And, increases wayfinding efficiency thereby decreasing Drive around time benefitting the environment by lowering wasteful gas emissions. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Lost revenues, increased parking violation appeals and complaints, ineffective parking policy decisions, frustrated parkers/drivers.


DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority

PROJECT TITLE

2015-16 REQUEST

2016-17 REQUEST

2017-18 REQUEST

2018-19 REQUEST

2019-20 REQUEST

1. WWTP Main Lift Pump Replacement 3,000

2. Ely Ave/Bouton St. Hydraulic Repair 1,000 2,000

3. Supplemental Treatment Upgrade 2,000

4. Solids Handling Facility 3,000 2,000

5. Keeler Brook Pump Station Upgrade 2,000

6. Collection System Rehabilitation 2,000 1,000 1,000

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

TOTAL 4,000 7,000 4,000 3,000 1,000

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority PROJECT TITLE: WWTP Main Lift Pump Replacement PROJECT LIFE: 30 years SCHEDULED START: 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing

RANKING: 1 – GO Funding _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Emergency replacement of 6 existing main lift pumps, VFDs, electrical components, mechanical piping, and controls with 6 new pumps and ancillary equipment.

JUSTIFICATION: The six main lift pumps at the WWTP are catastrophically failing. In order to prevent environmental and public health issues, new pumps and appurtenances are needed.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL





Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,000 3,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 3,000 3,000

CAPITAL BUDGET -E1-

-E2- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Water Pollution Control Authority PROJECT TITLE: WWTP Main Lift Pump Replacement 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _ _ No _X_ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ____ ______ Approved _________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Based on cost estimates from our consultant engineer. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _X If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions _________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. The MLPs at the WWTP are critical to ensure that sanitary sewage is conveyed through the WWTP. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded.

The MLPs at the WWTP are critical to ensure that sanitary sewage is conveyed through the WWTP. Without the pumps, raw sewage enters the Norwalk River and Long Island Sound.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority PROJECT TITLE: Ely Avenue and Bouton Street Hydraulic

Repair PROJECT LIFE: 30 years SCHEDULED START: 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2017


DESCRIPTION: Sanitary sewer issue on Ely Avenue.

JUSTIFICATION: There are multiple high points in the sanitary sewer interceptor (gravity system) that creates a surcharged condition resulting in excessive grease and grit in the line.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 1,000 2,000 3,000


Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,000 2,000 3,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 1,000 2,000 3,000

CAPITAL BUDGET -E3-

-E4- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Water Pollution Control Authority PROJECT TITLE: Ely Ave/Bouton St Hydraulic Repair 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _ _ No _X_ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ____ ______ Approved _________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Based on cost estimates prepared by WPCA consultant. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _X If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions _________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

The surcharged interceptor creates a major maintenance issue at this location. Routine cleaning only removes a portion that builds up.


Grit and grease could potentially cause a blockage in the interceptor that would result in a major sewage release impacting the environment and public.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority PROJECT TITLE: Supplemental Treatment Upgrade PROJECT LIFE: 30 years SCHEDULED START: 2014 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2017


DESCRIPTION: Supplemental Treatment Upgrade

JUSTIFICATION: Required to address aging CSO/Wet Weather drum screens that are used to treat flow above 30 mgd. Original facility was installed in 1980 and screens are beyond their expected useful life.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design





REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 500 2,000 2,500

CAPITAL BUDGET -E5-

-E6- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Water Pollution Control Authority PROJECT TITLE: Supplemental Treatment Upgrade 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X_ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ____$500,000 ______ Approved ___$500,000______ If not, why is the project now included? WWTP Phase II is on indefinite hold and these screens must continue to operate. 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Based on cost estimates contained in the WPCA’s Asset Management Plan. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _X If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions _________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Required to address aging CSO/Wet Weather drum screens that are used to treat flow above 30 mgd. Original facility was installed in 1980 and screens are beyond their expected useful life.


CSO/Wet Weather drum screens are used to treat flow above 30 mgd and are required to be in operation in accordance with the City’s NPDES permit. The City would be in violation without operational drum screens.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority PROJECT TITLE: Solids Handling Facility PROJECT LIFE: 30 years SCHEDULED START: 2014 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2017


DESCRIPTION: Solids Handling Facility

JUSTIFICATION: The 1990’s WWTP upgrade only provided provisions for liquid sludge hauling from the solids handling facility. Liquid hauling is very expensive (today) and not a viable option. OMI, at their cost, installed a belt filter press to dewater sludge and dispose of sludge cake which is more economical to haul and dispose.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 200 3,000 2,000 5,200


Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 200 3,000 2,000 5,200

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 200 3,000 2,000 5,200

CAPITAL BUDGET -E7-

-E8- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Water Pollution Control Authority PROJECT TITLE: Solids Handling Facility 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X _ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ____ $200,000 ______ Approved ____$200,000_____ If not, why is the project now included? 3. How was your cost estimate derived? Based on cost estimates contained in the WPCA’s Asset Management Plan. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _X If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions _________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Liquid sludge hauling from the solids handling facility is very expensive (today) and not a viable option.


When OMI’s contract expires, OMI or other contract operator contracted by the WPCA will charge a premium for solids handling due to a lack of sufficient dewatering equipment.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority PROJECT TITLE: Keeler Brook Pump Station Upgrade PROJECT LIFE: 30 years SCHEDULED START: 2018 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2020


DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Keeler Brook Pump Station

JUSTIFICATION: Rehabilitate the 4-MGD Keeler Brook Pump Station built in 1971 with minimal updates since construction. The harsh environment has greatly degraded this pump station.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design




Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,000 2,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 2,000 2,000

CAPITAL BUDGET -E9-

-E10 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Water Pollution Control Authority PROJECT TITLE: Keeler Brook Pump Station Upgrade 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _ _ No _X_ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ____ ______ Approved _________ If not, why is the project now included? 4. How was your cost estimate derived? Based on cost estimates of similar projects. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _X If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions _________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Pump station components are 1971 and require updating.


Failure of this system will have major water quality impact as sewage will not be conveyed from the Keeler Brook and Five Mile service area to the WWTP.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority PROJECT TITLE: Collection System Rehabilitation PROJECT LIFE: 50 years SCHEDULED START: 2005 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing


DESCRIPTION: Collection System Rehabilitation

JUSTIFICATION: This on-going series of projects are needed to rehabilitate the City’s approximately 170 miles of sanitary sewer that are in many cases over 100 years old. The WPCA’s contract operator has completed closed-circuit television inspection of the sanitary sewer system and has identified $20-million in repairs needed to ensure that sewage can be conveyed to the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) without interruption of service.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 9,650 2,000 1,000 1,000 13,650


Other/Contingency TOTAL EXPENDITURES 9,650 2,000 1,000 1,000 13,650

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 9,650 2,000 1,000 1,000 13,650

CAPITAL BUDGET -E11-

-E12- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Water Pollution Control Authority PROJECT TITLE: Collection System Rehabilitation 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X_ No __ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $9,650,000____ ______ Approved $9,650,000_________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Based on cost estimates contained in the WPCA’s Asset Management Plan. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _X If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions _________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

This on-going series of projects are needed to rehabilitate the City’s approximately 200 miles of sanitary sewer that is in many cases over 100 years old.


The WPCA’s contract operator has completed closed-circuit television inspection of the sanitary sewer system and has identified $20-million in repairs needed to ensure that sewage can be conveyed to the WWTP without interruption of service.


DEPARTMENT: Board of Education

PROJECT TITLE

2015-16 REQUEST

2016-17 REQUEST

2017-18 REQUEST

2018-19 REQUEST

2019-20 REQUEST

1. Norwalk Early Childhood Center (Phase 2) 556,988

2. District Bldg. Management System (BMS) 1,000,000

3. District Technology 1,032,800 1,032,800 1,032,800 1,032,800 1,032,800 4. West Rocks MS (Window Replacement) 800,000

5. District Paving & Concrete 535,000 350,000 280,000 315,000 500,000

6. District Fire Alarm System (FA) 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000

7. Jefferson E. S. Construction 357,500 7,948,920

8. Cranbury E. S. Construction 255,250 5,756,650

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

TOTAL 4,424,788 2,240,300 10,016,970 7,604,450 1,532,800

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: Norwalk Early Childhood Center (Phase 2)

PROJECT LIFE: 30 Years SCHEDULED START: 7/1/2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 6/30/2016

RANKING: 1 __ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION:

Phase Two of Construction for the Norwalk Early Childhood Center for the 50/50 Special Education Pre-K Center.

JUSTIFICATION:

The CREC report recommended the consolidation of the Norwalk Public Schools 50/50 Special Education Pre-K Classes. The Board of Education has approved the 11 Allen Road Site as the location for the new Norwalk Early Childhood Center. This consolidation of Special Education Pre-K is the first step in developing a continuum of services for Special Education to slow the growth of out of district placements.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction (includes remediation) 1,651,000 514,671 2,165,671

Equipment/Materials


TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,651,000 556,988 2,207,988

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 1,651,000 556,988 2,207,988 CAPITAL BUDGET F-1

F-2 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: Norwalk Early Childhood Center (Phase 2) 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $____________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimates are derived from cost proposal by Silver Petrucelli & Associates Study. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ X__ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _$(290,000)______ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.


Without moving forward with the full completion of the Norwalk Early Childhood Center we cannot move forward with the development of an in house SPED program to serve students in Norwalk and prevent the outflow of students to out of district placements. There is a strong need as cited by the CREC report for a consolidation of our SPED Pre-K Classrooms so that we can begin the building of a continuum of education for special needs students.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: District Building Management System (BMS)



DESCRIPTION:

Replace current Building Management System serving HVAC systems at 16 district schools & Central Kitchen.

JUSTIFICATION:

Current Building Management Systems have exceeded their useful life and in need of replacement to web based direct digital control (DDC). The majority of current systems are dependent on pneumatic (compressed air) control and a 56k modem for communication. Set points and central control are difficult to navigate and provide consistent temperature throughout. As a result, the district is consuming increased utility costs as opposed to providing a streamlined approach in line with lower utility costs. Web based control provides an advantage to access the BMS in order to achieve temperature comfort on demand.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 1,000,000 1,000,000

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,000,000 1,000,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 1,000,000 1,000,000 CAPITAL BUDGET F-3

F-4 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: District Building Management System (BMS) 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $____________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimates are derived from current day pricing of industry standards for a task of this size. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ X__ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _$0_____________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Increased comfort cooling/heating calls from students, staff and administrators have placed the need for the project as a high priority. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?

The district will continue to utilize increased fuel and utilities resulting in higher costs..

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: DISTRICT TECHNOLOGY



DESCRIPTION:

This request supports our need to continue the implementation of Technology in the District consistent with the Board of Education’s support of this project. We are moving forward in the implementation of network upgrades as well as devices/computer refresh and hard acquisitions.

JUSTIFICATION:

Beginning in July 2015, the District has begun the first year of a three (3) year Strategic Technology Plan, approved by the Board of Education and the Connecticut State Department of Education. These purchases are necessary for the implementation of that plan in accordance to the timeline and are also the foundation for the Common Core State Standards initiative (CCSS).


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials 1,032,800 1,032,800 1,032,800 1,032,800 1,032,800 5,164,000

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,032,800 1,032,800 1,032,800 1,032,800 1,032,800 5,164,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 1,032,800 1,032,800 1,032,800 1,032,800 1,032,800 5,164,000 CAPITAL BUDGET F-5

F-6 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: DISTRICT TECHNOLOGY 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X__ No __ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $1,075,000_____________ Approved $500,000_______ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ ___ No _X_ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _$______________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

With the new Common Core State Standards (CCSS) requirements, the Board of Education does not have the current infrastructure, computer hardware, and instructional hardware/software to meet the Federal guidelines. Although this Capital Budget provides some fundamental technology resources to begin implementing the CCSS, it is significantly less than what is truly needed to ensure that CCSS are fully maintained. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?

With many of the computers and systems in the District aging the ability for teachers and Students to use technology to improve learning is drastically hindered. The District 3 year Strategic Plan was just completed in 2012 (by the Technology Committee) to address the needs of stakeholders and this Capital plan mirrors the Districts improvement plan exactly. To this end, it will be impossible to adhere to the upcoming Technology Plan if not fully funded.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: West Rocks MS (Window replacement)



DESCRIPTION:

Replace all exterior windows & entrance doors.

JUSTIFICATION:

Current exterior windows and entrance doors have exceeded their useful life and in need of replacement. Due to the integrity of the current interior windows, there is a safety and security risk. In addition, fuel consumption and utility costs are not aligned with current day energy efficiency savings.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design 100,000 100,000






REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 800,000 800,000 CAPITAL BUDGET F-7

F-8 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: West Rocks MS (Window Replacement) 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $____________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimates are derived from current day pricing & industry standards for a tack of this size. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ X__ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _$(290,000)______ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _Repeated need for service requests & utility costs will be impacted in a positive way. 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Current windows original to building and comprised of metal single pane lites. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?

Security risk, safety risk, increased utility costs & increased fuel consumption costs.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: DISTRICT PAVING & CONCRETE

PROJECT LIFE: 25 Years SCHEDULED START: SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 6/30/2019


DESCRIPTION:

Asphalt pavement and concrete replacement at 20 school sites to eliminate deterioration of parking lots, drives, curbing and sidewalks.

JUSTIFICATION:

To replace broken and deteriorated asphalt at all school sites. To eliminate pot holes, broken curbing, heavily cracked and failed roadway surfaces. To replace concrete sidewalks and curbing that has deteriorated and damaged by snow plowing. Conditions continue to deteriorate and the resulting safety issues and concerns associated with them increases. Temporary repairs by the maintenance department are no longer possible at many of the sires. Some school drives, sidewalks and sections of lots may need to be taken out of service very soon, if the necessary restoration work is further prolonged.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 63,000 535,000 350,000 280,000 315,000 500,000 2,043,000

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 63,000 535,000 350,000 280,000 315,000 500,000 2,043,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 63,000 535,000 350,000 281,000 315,000 500,000 2,043,000 CAPITAL BUDGET F-9

F-10 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: District Paving & Concrete 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X__ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $365,000________________ Approved $100,000________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Department estimates using DPW unit pricing. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ X__ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _$___________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Very Important. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?

Continued deterioration of asphalt and concrete parking lots, drives, curbing, sidewalks andwalkways.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: DISTRICT FIRE ALARM SYSTEM (FA)



DESCRIPTION:

Replace current Fire Alarm Systems serving all district schools and bring them to current code standards with a synchronized system.

JUSTIFICATION:

Current Fire Alarm Systems have exceeded their useful life and in need of replacement to an addressable system. A systematic approach to this project is in order to begin replacing systems with obsolete parts. The need to replace all field devices and head end processor is required to provide adequate life safety support at each district school.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000 CAPITAL BUDGET F-11

F-12 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: District Fire Alarm System (FA) 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $____________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimates are derived by current day pricing & industry standards for a task of this size. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ X__ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _$ ______ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget Repeated need for service requests will be impacted in a positive way.__ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Current FA systems are plagued with obsolete equipment and are hard wired as opposed to addressable systems.


The district will continue to operate with FA systems that are not code compliant.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: Jefferson E. S. Construction

PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: 7/1/2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 6/30/2016

RANKING: 7 __ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION:

School Construction projects deferred until recommendations from Facility Utilization Study are complete. This study will help determine what specific school construction projects are needed based on enrollment and boundary lines.

JUSTIFICATION:

Deferred School Construction Project.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction (includes remediation) 357,500 7,948,920 8,306,420

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 357,500 7,948,920 8,306,420

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 357,500 7,948,920 8,306,420 CAPITAL BUDGET F-13

F-14 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: Jefferson E. S. Construction 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No __ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $____________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _$ ______ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.


2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: Cranbury E. S. Construction



DESCRIPTION:

School construction projects deferred until recommendations from Facility Utilization Study are complete. This study will help determine what specific school construction projects are needed based on enrollment and boundary lines.

JUSTIFICATION:

Deferred School Construction Project.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction (includes remediation) 255,250 5,756,650 6,011,900

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 255,250 5.756,650 6,011,900 CAPITAL BUDGET F-15

F-16 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION PROJECT TITLE: Cranbury E. E. Construction 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $____________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _$ ______ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.



DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks

PROJECT TITLE

2015-16 REQUEST

2016-17 REQUEST

2017-18 REQUEST

2018-19 REQUEST

2019-20 REQUEST

1. Vehicles 188,000 70,000 45,000

2. Vets. Park Launch Ramps, Visitors Docks 1,600,000 1,660,000

3. Brien McMahon Replacement Turf(main field) new turf drainage 1,620,000

4.Cranbury Park/Gallagher Estate 350,000 1,600,000 900,000 400,000 400,000

5.Backstop/Fencing 50,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000

6. Basketball/Tennis 165,000 70,000 100,000

7. Schools and Playgrounds 90,000 100,000 100,000

8. Fodor Farm Caretaker Apt. 40,000

9. Tree Planting 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000

10. Open Space Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000

11. Rowayton Community Docks 50,000 400,000

12. Park Lighting Energy Savings 65,000

13. Parks Garage Paving of Lot 60,000

14.Oyster Shell Park 250,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000

15. Master Plan of Parks 150,000

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

TOTAL 4,613 4,935 2,030 1,265 1,265

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Vehicles PROJECT LIFE: 10+ SCHEDULED START: July, 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION:

RANKING: 1 __ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION:

Toro Groundsmaster 5910 $95,500 2015 Toro Groundsmaster 300 4WD 72” Deck $47,500 2015

V-Plow Mounting Kit (1) 350 pick-up truck $45,000 2015 (2) 250 pick-up truck $70,000 2016 (2) 250 pick-up truck $45,000 2017

JUSTIFICATION: Currently we have only one piece of equipment that we use on footpaths for snow, the new mower is equipped with a full v plow and winterized cabin. Replacement of 22 year old pick- up truck The Department had three working Toro’s currently only 2 are working the other is providing parts for the 2 working mowers. Besides the garbage truck the large mowers have the most hours of all equipment.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials 194,000 188,000 70,000 452,000

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 194,000 188,000 70,000

452,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 194,000 188,000 70,000

452,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-1

G-2 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Vehicles 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__Yes_____________________ Approved $194,000_________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses _______________ Net effect on Operating Budget _Reduce Labor Costs 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

N/A

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Field Maintenance, Liability

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Veterans Park Launch

Ramp/Visitor Dock Replacement PROJECT LIFE: 25+ SCHEDULED START: Oct, 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: April, 2016


DESCRIPTION:

Total rebuild of the Cities Launch Ramps and $1,600,000 2015-16 Visitors Docks.

2nd phase of Master Plan $1,660,000 2017 (new Boating Center Facility)

JUSTIFICATION: The current ramps are over 50+ year old. Current visitor’s docks do not meet current marine code for safety.

Currently the boating center is a former mobile trailer, new design would call for a full service boating center, restrooms, showers, classroom, and office for staff.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design 75,000 60,000 135,000


Construction 1,600,000 1,600,000 3,200,000

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency


3,335,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 75,000 1,600,000 1,660,000

3,335,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-3

G-4 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Veterans Park Launch Ramp/Visitor Dock Replacement 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_75,000________________ Approved $75,000__________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Consultant figures, based on cities needs for water access. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No x___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _Yes commercial traffic B. Decreased Operating Expenses _less repairs________ C. Additional Salary Costs ___N/A_____________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ___N/A____________ Net effect on Operating Budget _Reduce Labor Costs 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

The public ramps are unusable during certain tides as well as unrepairable.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Closing the ramps for public use.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Brien McMahon Jack Casagrand Field Re-Turf PROJECT LIFE: 12+ SCHEDULED START: July 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Sept. 2015


DESCRIPTION:

Replacement of Artificial Turf on Main Field, the $500,000 2015 existing turf is 10 years old and was only guaranteed for 8 years, the field has to be replaced for safety of the users.

The baseball and practice soccer field was $1,100,000 2015. Designed for turf needs drainage and turf only.

JUSTIFICATION: For safety and liability purposes field had numerous emergency repairs last year to get by for the year.

Original design called for artificial turf and was designed for this application. Project would extend the season and playability of the field since lighting is already installed.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL



Construction 1,600,000 1,600,000

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,620,000

1,620,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 1,620,000

1,620,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-5

G-6 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Brien McMahon Jack Casagrand Field Re-Turf 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_______________________ Approved $__0________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Consultant for Field improvements and Turf Consultant 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No x___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ___N/A_____________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses __Yes less moving and maintenance_ C. Additional Salary Costs ___N/A_____________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ___N/A____________ Net effect on Operating Budget _Reduce Labor Costs 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Main Field cannot be used for play, the baseball field will continue to be an issue with three sports playing from March – November making it impossible to maintain to safety standards.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Cranbury Park/Gallaher Estate PROJECT LIFE: 30+ SCHEDULED START: November 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: April 2016


DESCRIPTION:

• Repair Exterior Masonry and Flashing $ 270,000 2015 • New Boiler $ 80,000 2015 • Electrical updates A/C, plumbing ADA $1,600,000 2016 • Addition for enclosed rental space $ 900,000 2017 • Trail Restoration $ 400,000 2018 • Trail Restoration $ 400,000 2019

JUSTIFICATION: Current building assessment recently completed indicates that the masonry must be addressed so that we can preserve all internal finishes.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design 25,000 25,000 100,000 50,000 200,000


Construction 525,000 325,000 1,500,000 850,000 400,000 400,000 4,000,000

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 550,000 350,000 1,600,000 900,000 400,000 400,000 4,200,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 550,000 350,000 1,600,000 900,000 400,000 400,000 4,200,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-7

G-8 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $___850,000_______________ Approved $_550,000_____ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Consultants 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _Less Repairs to interim surfaces C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses _______________ Net effect on Operating Budget _Reduce Labor Costs 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Further deterioration of internal and external finishes to maintain the building standard for its National Historic designation.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Backstop/Fencing PROJECT LIFE: 15+ SCHEDULED START: July, 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June, 2016


DESCRIPTION: Replace existing perimeter fencing and safety fencing throughout the park system $50,000 2015

Highlights * School perimeter fencing Safety Fencing Ball Field, Out Field Fencing, Backstop Marvin, Kendall

JUSTIFICATION: Safety purposes and repairs


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials 35,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 245,000

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 35,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 245,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 35,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 245,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-9

G-10 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Backstop/Fencing 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes X___ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__35,000_____________ Approved $_35,000_________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Current Contract 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _____N/A___________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses _______________ Net effect on Operating Budget _Reduce Labor Costs 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Potential liability from damaged fencing.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Basketball/Tennis PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: SCHEDULED COMPLETION:


DESCRIPTION: West Rocks Tennis Court Resurface $45,000 2015 Repair Roodner Court Basketball Court and Tennis Courts crack coat and seal $85,000 2015 Crack Coat and Seal damaged courts Around city $35,000 2015

JUSTIFICATION: The purpose is to repair and resurface Sports surfaces in order to maintain safe and quality venues.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 165,000 70,000 100,000 335,000

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 165,000 70,000 100,000 335,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 165,000 70,000 100,000 335,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-11

G-12 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Basketball/Tennis 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes x___ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__94,000___________ Approved $_54,000__ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Current Contract Prices. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ____N/A___________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses _______________ Net effect on Operating Budget _Reduce Labor Costs 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Courts closed not playable.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: School & Playgrounds PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: October 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2016


DESCRIPTION: Replacement Playground for Cranbury School $60,000 2015 Kindergarten Classes Replacement of single piece of equipment from Vandalism or age around the city $15,000 2015 Filer Chip replacement $15,000 2015

JUSTIFICATION: Replacement for age appropriate equipment at Cranbury School due to the current age of the equipment.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials 150,000 90,000 100,000 100,000 440,000

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 150,000 90,000 100,000 100,000 440,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 150,000 90,000 100,000 100,000 440,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-13

G-14 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: School and Playgrounds 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_150,000________________ Approved $_150,000__ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No x___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses _______________ Net effect on Operating Budget _Reduce Labor Costs 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Potential liability with equipment not meeting current standards.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Fodor Farm PROJECT LIFE: 100+ SCHEDULED START: July 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2016

RANKING: 8 x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Caretakers Cottage, plumbing, heating, sheetrock $40,000 2015 insulation, structural work.

JUSTIFICATION: Completion of the Historic Property in accordance with the State Grant received and to prepare the property for the National Registry. Rental for the Caretaker’s Cottage with on-site supervision.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design



Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency


140,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 100,000 40,000

140,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-15

G-16 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Fodor Farm 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__100,000___________ Approved $_100,000_________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ x__ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _No operating costs when completed, revenue for the city caretaker rent, main house costs Paid by users B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions _____0_____________ D. Additional operating expenses ______x_________ Net effect on Operating Budget _ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Completion in accordance with State Grant.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? State requirements for grant request, the project must be completed.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Tree Planting PROJECT LIFE: 20+ SCHEDULED START: Fall, 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: May 2016

RANKING: 9 _x NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Establish a tree-planting program including all Parks, School Grounds, as well as municipal grounds

JUSTIFICATION: In order to undertake a reasonable tree maintenance program including replacement, park safety, and beautification funding must be in place each year. We have had a tremendous amount of Trees die over the past several years due to the stress from the past years of storms.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 40,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 215,000

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 40,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 215,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-17

G-18 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Tree Planting 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes __x_ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__40,000_______________ Approved $_40,000____ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses _______________ Net effect on Operating Budget _Reduce Labor Costs 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Trees that have been removed will be replaced.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Open Space Fund PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: SCHEDULED COMPLETION:


DESCRIPTION:

Establishing open space fund for the purpose of acquiring and securing open space.

JUSTIFICATION: On March 14, 2000 the Norwalk Common Council adapted an amendment to the Norwalk code, creating the Open Space Fund. The purpose of the Open Space Fund shall be to preserve or create Norwalk’s Open Space and to protect its natural resources by providing financial support for initiatives and activities that primarily seek to preserve parcel of open space in perpetuity. The Open Space Fund shall be used to acquire real property, payment of acquisitions by non-for-profit organizations on payments required to designate properties as open space.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-19

G-20 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Open Space Fund 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__50,000______________ Approved $_50,000_________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No x___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses _______________ Net effect on Operating Budget _ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Money will not be in place for future open space purchases.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Rowayton Community Docks PROJECT LIFE: 30+ SCHEDULED START: October, 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: April, 2016

RANKING: 11 x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: To design for a new Seawall, ADA Accessibility as well as Floating Docks at the Rowayton Community Docks $50,000 2015 Replacement of Seawall and Docks $400,000 2016

JUSTIFICATION: The current condition of the seawall needs replacement as well as public access to the visitor dock and boat storage area.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL




Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency


450,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 50,000 400,000

450,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-21

G-22 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Rowayton Community Docks 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _x _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $________________ Approved $__0________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ x__ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses _______________ Net effect on Operating Budget _Reduce Labor Costs 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Severe erosion caused by the past several storms have caused severe damage to the seawall, since the area is a public access ADA accessibility is needed to the visitor docks.


2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Park Lighting Energy Savings PROJECT LIFE: 8+ SCHEDULED START: July 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2016


DESCRIPTION: Replace existing Light Bulbs with L.E.D. Full cut off bulbs. The areas to be changed are Calf Pasture Beach, Shady Beach and Mathews Park.

JUSTIFICATION: Reduce the energy consumption for a savings as well as less maintenance to change bulbs since they last 6-8 years each.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design




Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 65,000

65,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 65,000

65,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-23

G-24 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Park Lighting Energy Savings 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _x _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_______________________ Approved $__0________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Price of fixture $325.00 per unit. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses _____x___________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses _______________ Net effect on Operating Budget _Reduce Labor Costs 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Electrical consumption will continue to rise.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Parks Garage Paving of Lot PROJECT LIFE: 20+ SCHEDULED START: July 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Aug. 2015


DESCRIPTION: Complete resurfacing of Parks Garage Parking and Storage lot and driveway. Has not been done since the garage was established in the 70’s.

JUSTIFICATION: Damage to equipment and drainage problems.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design



Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 60,000

60,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 60,000

60,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-25

G-26


DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Parks Garage Paving of Lot 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__60,000____________ Approved $__0________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No x___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses _______________ Net effect on Operating Budget _ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.


2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Oyster Shell Park PROJECT LIFE: 20+ SCHEDULED START: July 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: May 2016

RANKING: 14 x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: A shade structure (trellis) to complete Phase 1 of the project (project completed Dec. 2012) Site Furnishings $250,000 2015 Suite Preparation, earth work, drainage, water, paving, lighting, furnish plantings, Phase II $750,000 2016

Phase III $750,000 2017 $750,000 2018 $750,000 2019

JUSTIFICATION: Phase 1 has just been completed (except for site furnishings and Trellis). The Park is a direct link to South Norwalk from West Avenue. Phases II and III will allow full usage of the park with potential for city revenue through special events.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 250,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 3,250,000

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 250,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 3,250,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 250,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 3,250,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-27

G-28 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Oyster Shell Park 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__0_____________ Approved $__________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _x __ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue __When Completed B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs _Part Time Temp__ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses _Water, Electric, Police_ Net effect on Operating Budget _50,000 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? With 95-7 on the horizon it is imperative that the City fund the next phases in the park especially for security and safety reasons.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Master Plan of Parks PROJECT LIFE: 10 Years SCHEDULED START: SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Spring, 2016


DESCRIPTION:

A complete update of the Master plan of Parks and Open Space for the city. The last update was in the mid 90’s. $150,000 2016-17

JUSTIFICATION: In order to access needs in the community the Master plan should be updated every 10 years. When planning for future property purchase as well as park infrastructure a current plan will create a footprint for future development.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

150,000

150,000

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

150,000

150,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST

150,000

150,000

CAPITAL BUDGET G-29

G-30 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Recreation and Parks PROJECT TITLE: Master Plan of Parks 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $____150,000____________ Approved $__0________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ x__ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ______x__________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ______x__________ C. Additional Salary Costs _____x___________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses _______________ Net effect on Operating Budget _ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.



DEPARTMENT: Norwalk Public Library

PROJECT TITLE

2015-16 REQUEST

2016-17 REQUEST

2017-18 REQUEST

2018-19 REQUEST

2019-20 REQUEST

1. Auditorium Soundproofing 18,000

2. Children’s Rooms Renovation 23,000 26,000 45,000 44,000 65,000

3. Newspaper Digitization Project 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 22,000

4. RFID Conversion & Implementation 152,000 16,000

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

TOTAL 62,000 199,000 82,000 65,000 87,000

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Library PROJECT TITLE: LIBRARY AUDITORIUM SOUNDPROOFING

PROJECT LIFE:10 YRS SCHEDULED START: 9/1/15 SCHEDULED COMPLETION:12/31/15

RANKING: 1 __ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __ XREPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Install soundproofing padding in floor of branch library auditorium $18,000 The quote came from Valerio Giadone, one of the architects involved in the renovation of the branch. His suggestion is that the existing carpet be removed, provide soundproofing carpet underlayment and provide new carpet above. Depending on the effectiveness of the soundproofing underlayment additional sound deadening insulation may be installed below the ceiling at the main floor level in the reading and computer areas.

JUSTIFICATION: Auditorium in branch holds 120 people. The branch was renovated in 2006, but the auditorium is in need of soundproofing that did not take place during the renovation. The auditorium is directly over the computer and reading room area in the front of the library. Most movement in the auditorium can be heard on the first floor. Especially when there is a children’s program in the auditorium, the noise is deafening.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design

Site Costs & Engineering


Equipment/Materials 25,000

25,000

Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 25,000 18,000 43,000

CAPITAL BUDGET H-1

H-2 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Library PROJECT TITLE: LIBRARY AUDITORIUM SOUNDPROOFING 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes __X No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $25,000_________________ Approved $25,000_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Contractor estimate 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

We have been able to refurbish both auditoriums with video/data projectors, screens, speakers, microphones, and sound controls. We were not able to cover the cost of the soundproofing at the branch in 2014-15, so we ask to complete the project with the soundproofing in 2015-16.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? We will continue to disturb the quiet for which people come to the library to study.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Library PROJECT TITLE: CHILDREN’S ROOMS RENOVATIONS


RANKING: 2 X_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __ XREPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: FY 2015-16 - $23,000 $8,000 to redesign the main library’s layout and $15,000 to finish the wall and ceiling FY 2016-17 – 26,000

$15,000 for new activity room in the main library and $11,000 for lighting for the branch

FY 2017-18 - Window Treatments $45,000 $30,000 for the main library and $15,000 for the branch

FY 2018-19 Carpet and Window Treatments $44,000 34,000 for the man library and $10,000 for the branch

FY 2019-2020 Furniture and Shelving $65,000 $40,000 for the main library and $25,000 for the branch

JUSTIFICATION: For the past year in both buildings we had 396 programs for children ages birth - 2 with 7,769 in attendance; 594 programs for children ages 3 – 5 with 9,044 in attendance; 705 programs for children ages 6 – 11 with 6,611 children in attendance. This type of attendance creates wear and tear on carpet and furniture. We can show our appreciation to tax payers, parents/citizens with consistent upkeep and beautification of the rooms


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL



Construction 15,000 26,000 41,000

Equipment/Materials 45,000 44,000 65,000 154,000

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 23,000 26,000 45,000 44,000 65,000 203,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 23,000 26,000 45,000 44,000 65,000 203,000

CAPITAL BUDGET H-3

H-4 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Library PROJECT TITLE: CHILDREN’S ROOMS RENOVATIONS 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _X _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Vendor Estimates 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No _X__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

The main library children’s room was renovated in 1981. The delivery of children’s public services has changed since then. The branch library renovation in 2004 stopped short of finishing the walls and ceiling and didn’t provide adequate lighting for the non-fiction room.


The implications would be further wear and tear of material s at the main library and continued deterioration of the walls at the branch.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Library PROJECT TITLE: NEWSPAPER DIGITIZATION PROJECT PROJECT LIFE:10 YRS SCHEDULED START:7/1/15 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 6/30/16

RANKING: 3 __ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __ XREPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: $11k (A) Norwalk Gazette (1818-1899) 20 reels 2014-15 $21k 1. South Norwalk Sentinel(1870-1909) 49 reels 2015-16 $21k 2. South Norwalk Sentinel(1910-1922) 50 reels 2016-17 $21k 3. South Norwalk Sentinel(1923-1932) 50 reels 2017-18 $21k 4. South Norwalk Sentinel(1933-1945) 50 reels 2018-19 $22k 5. Norwalk Hour [weekly](1872-1921) 13 reels 2019-20 Norwalk Hour [daily](1895-1909) 44 reels 2019-20

JUSTIFICATION: The Norwalk History Room developed a multi-year program to digitize Norwalk’s four major historic newspapers. Digitizing these papers will both preserve them and enhance discovery and access to them. The digitization involves running optical character recognition software over the microfilm images, indexing this file, and placing it in a searchable database. In our case, the State Library has offered to host our digitized newspapers as part of the “Connecticut Digital Newspaper Project.” This alone will save thousands of dollars over time as hosting is a continuing cost. They will also hold our master negatives in their climate and temperature controlled vault in Rocky Hill, CT at no charge. We have started our project with the Norwalk Gazette (1818-1899) because it is Norwalk’s oldest surviving newspaper, and the only news title that we hold in actual paper. It is now very fragile. The city has included $11k in our current budget to digitize the Gazette. Final bids were received this week. If all goes as planned, the Norwalk Gazette will be fully searchable on the State Library’s newspaper site this winter. We anticipate success and hope that all work is complete prior to our capital budget review. The Norwalk Gazette is an important proof of concept statement for our newspaper project.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials 11,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 22,000 117,000

Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 11,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 22,000 117,000

CAPITAL BUDGET H-5

H-6 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Library PROJECT TITLE: NEWSPAPER DIGITIZATION PROJECT 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

With the closing of the Norwalk Museum, the library has inherited the people who are interested in Norwalk’s heritage. Modern researchers expect the information to be searchable online.


People will have to use the outdated and hard to use microfilm and they won’t be able to perform key word searches without digitization. Citizens will be reduced to searching for items in the library as microfilm is not available online.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Library PROJECT TITLE: RFID PROJECT LIFE:10 YRS SCHEDULED START: 7/1/17 SCHEDULED COMPLETION:6/30/18

RANKING: 4 X__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT

__REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: FID Year 1: Conversion, Circulation, Security. $151,900 Purchase tags, 300,000@ $.20--$60,000 Media hub tags 24,000 @ $.32--$7,680 Media full tags 10,000 @ $.80--$8,000 Rent conversion stations, 2/6months @ $3,200--$6,400 Purchase staff RFID pad/workstations 12 @ $1,985--$23,820 Purchase and install 4 self-checkout kiosks--$40,000 Allowance for data/electrical changes--$6,000 RFID Year 2: Self check/self pay $15,200 Add auto-pay to self checkout stations, 4 @ $1,300 = $5,200 Allowance for data/electrical changes--$10,000

JUSTIFICATION: RFID technology allows for better inventory control and tracking of library materials, plus self-checkout. 82% of public libraries plan to install self-checkout machines, a process which is efficient with RFID.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 6,000 10,000 16,000

Equipment/Materials 146,000 5,000 151,000

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

152,000 16,000 168,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 152,000 16,000 168,000

CAPITAL BUDGET H-7

H-8 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Library PROJECT TITLE: RFID 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes __X_ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request 138,800$_________________ Approved $0_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? VENDOR ESTIMATES 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No _X__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

RFID is the industry standard for inventory control and self-checkout.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? NPL may not be able to control losses or to implement self-checkout. The cost to implement the project may increase with each passing year.


DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission

PROJECT TITLE

2015-16 REQUEST

2016-17 REQUEST

2017-18 REQUEST

2018-19 REQUEST

2019-20 REQUEST

1. Mathews Park Buildings 40,000 15,000 50,000 175,000

2. LMMM Roof Leak Repair 216,000

3. Mill Hill ADA Master Plan Implementation 94,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

4. New Museum at LH ADA Access 100,000 100,000

5. WPA Murals 25,000 15,000

6. Cemetery Conservation/Restoration 40,000 40,000 60,000

7. LMMM Improvement Project 25,000 60,000 225,000 150,000 250,000

8. Barn/Smith Street Buildings 10,000 100,000 20,000

9. Cemetery Site Work 10,000 10,000 10,000

10. Mill Hill Buildings 225,000

11. Museum Collection Archive/ Cataloguing 10,000 10,000

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

TOTAL 560,000 660,000 440,000 440,000 435,000

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Mathews Park Buildings PROJECT LIFE: 75-100 years SCHEDULED START: July 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2020


DESCRIPTION: 2015/16 - $35,000 - Recreate Missing Porch/Temporary ADA Access $ 5,000 - Replace leaking pipes in second floor walls 2016/17 - $15,000 - Replace portion of rear roof and flashing 2018/19 - $20,000 - Architectural plans for replacing slate roofs on Lodge & Carriage House, recreate missing Belvedere on Carriage House and ADA access $30,000 - Demolish addition to Gate Lodge, build ADA ramps 2019/20 - $175,000 - Replace slate roofs on Lodge & Carriage House; recreate missing Belvedere. ($150,000 matching grant from state – total project $325,000.)

JUSTIFICATION: Architectural Plans for rebuilding the missing Gate Lodge Porch were completed in 2013. The missing porch has become a Public Safety issue because of ice build-up in the winter and there is no ADA access to the building. Future projects include restoring the slate roofs on the Gate Lodge and Carriage House, as well as recreating the missing Belvedere on the Carriage House, and permanent ADA access to the Gate Lodge to be partially funded by a state grant.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL



Construction/Restoration 40,000 15,000 30,000 175,000 260,000


Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)

Previous Capital Budget

NET COST 40,000 15,000 50,000 175,000 280,000

CAPITAL BUDGET I-1

I-2 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Mathews Park Buildings 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes X___ No __ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $42,000 (2015/16)____ Approved $40,000 (2015/16)_ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

Costs are based on quotes for previous and related work.

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _____________________________________________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. In addition to work on the LM Mansion itself, the other buildings that make up Mathews Park require ongoing maintenance, repairs and improvements as part of the ongoing restoration work and are necessary for the ongoing preservation and care of the park buildings. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? The proper care and maintenance of the Mathews Park buildings is necessary to prevent future damage or further deterioration of the exteriors of these structures as well as preserve and restore the historic integrity of the buildings. Public Safety is compromised.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: LMMM Roof Leak Repair PROJECT LIFE: 25-50 years SCHEDULED START: July 2013 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2016

RANKING: 2 _x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Architectural plans were completed in 2013 identifying solutions to correct the leaks. The leaks stem from inadequate flashing, failed caulking, necessary masonry re-pointing, and original design flaws inherent in the building. A professional estimator estimated $466k in repairs. The project is being broken into three phases over the three years. The first and second phases ($250k) will be completed in January 2015. We are requesting that the third phase ($216k) be completed in 2015/16.

JUSTIFICATION: The LMMM has developed significant leaks in the roof which require immediate attention in order to preserve the integrity of the roof and prevent additional damage to the mansion’s structure and interior. The leaks are causing wood rot to the original structure as well as damaging the priceless decorative painted ceilings originally created for the mansion by famous 19th century designers and furniture makers the Herter Brothers.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 250,000 216,000 466,000


Other


REVENUE (Specify) State Grant


NET COST 250,000 216,000 466,000

CAPITAL BUDGET I-3

I-4


DEPARTMENT Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: LMMM Roof Leak Repair 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No __ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ___216,000_____________ Approved $___216,000__________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

Professionally Estimated. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _____________________________________________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. It is a long-standing policy of the City to provide public access to the waterfront and parks to the community and tourists. This project preserves one of America’s Treasures as identified by the Federal Government and the City of Norwalk and saves it from further destruction and deterioration, as well improving access in accordance with federal and state requirements. The restoration and upgrades will increase the Mansion’s ability to provide programs, resources and to attract tourists to Norwalk and promoting the City as a significant tourist destination. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Continued damage that may become irreparable to the Mansion’s structure and priceless decorative painted ceilings.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Mill Hill ADA & Master Plan Implementation PROJECT LIFE: 25-50 years SCHEDULED START: Jul 2014 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Jun 2019

RANKING: 3 x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT DESCRIPTION: 2015/16 - $ 25,000 – Design and construction drawings for replacement of three sets of stairs and sidewalks in front of the Town House; addition of a school bus pull-in on East Wall Street $ 69,000 – Asbestos abatement of office floor ($15k); Demolition of two bathrooms and construction of a single ADA bathroom, relocation of kitchenette and new floor ($40K); Relocation of electrical panel and rewiring ($6k); HVAC reconfiguration ($3k); Code compliant emergency lighting, smoke detectors, vapor barrier under main room floor ($5k) 2016/17 - $150,000 – estimate for improvements specified in 15/16 construction drawings 2017/18 - $25,000 - design and construction drawings for reconfigured parking lot and entrance $125,000 – estimate for improvements specified above 2018/19 - $150,000 – estimate for remaining master plan items implementation

JUSTIFICATION: Norwalk students, residents and tourists visit Mill Hill Park. It is not handicap accessible and must conform as part of the city’s public buildings. Mill Hill Park is the Wall St./East Ave green space and is a vital element in the planned revitalization of the Wall Street area. Exterior ADA access was added to the Town House, School House and Law Office in 2014. However, the Town House restrooms are not ADA compliant. Architectural plans have been completed but asbestos abatement will be required to complete the restroom work. Front steps, stairs, and sidewalks are crumbling and becoming a public safety hazard. The Council approved a master plan for Mill Hill in 2011 that addresses these and other issues.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL


25,000

60,000


Construction 190,000 69,000 150,000 125,000 150,000

684,000


Other/Contingency


744,000

REVENUE (Specify)


NET COST 200,000 94,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

744,000 CAPITAL BUDGET

I-5

I-6 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Mill Hill ADA & Master Plan Implementation 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No __ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ________$94,000___ Approved $94,000___________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? The costs were part of the 2010 Mill Hill Historic Site Plan Report. The estimates were furnished by AKRP. The phases of implementation have been defined by the Historical Commission. In 2013 a bid was issued and quotes came back confirming the original estimates.

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _____________________________________________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. It is a longstanding policy of the City to provide public access to the waterfront for our residents and as a tourist attraction. The Mill Hill Improvement and Green Space initiative is coupled with the Wall St Redevelopment project and will greatly enhance the pedestrian traffic flow and parking in and around the Green, Wall St. and Smith St. This initiative will also significantly enhance Norwalk’s tourism capabilities and expand the use of Mill Hill Park by making it ADA accessible and compliant. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? The entire project and accessibility will be postponed. The city will not be on schedule to make its properties ADA compliant as directed. The Historic site will be more difficult to access and will not contribute to the development of Norwalk. Public safety will be compromised,

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: New Museum at LH ADA access PROJECT LIFE: 25-50 years SCHEDULED START: Jul 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Jun 2017

RANKING: 4 x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT DESCRIPTION: An architecture firm has been hired and is reviewing and designing necessary ADA improvements to the Museum building and grounds. 2015-16 - $100,000 – phase I construction of ADA improvements, including bathrooms, ADA access ramps and sidewalks 2016-17 - $100,000 – phase II construction of ADA improvements including Elevator and basement level waterproofing.

JUSTIFICATION: The City is working with the Historical Society to create a new city museum at the museum’s original location at the City Hall Complex. The City’s ADA Coordinator has identified numerous non-compliant ADA issues with the old Lockwood House building next to the Health Department at City Hall that needs to be addressed. Operating the museum at this location will save taxpayers $1.8M over the next ten years. As a city-owned public site, ADA compliance is necessary.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design 50,000

50,000



200,000


Other/Contingency


250,000

REVENUE (Specify)


NET COST 50,000 100,000 100,000

250,000

CAPITAL BUDGET I-7

I-8 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: New Museum at LH ADA access 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes X__ No __ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $100,000 Approved $100,000 If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _____________________________________________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Current ADA Access is first floor only and is not compliant with current laws. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? The City will have liability exposure for non-compliance with current ADA laws and requirements.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: WPA Murals PROJECT LIFE: 50-75 years SCHEDULED START: Jul 2014 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Jun 2018

RANKING: 5 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT DESCRIPTION: 2015/16 - $25,000 – conservation of Ben Franklin Murals 2016/17 - $15,000 – conservation of Concert Hall Murals

JUSTIFICATION: The City of Norwalk WPA Murals collection is one of the largest and the finest in the United States. Currently, some of the Murals are displayed in an unsafe manner and require additional protection or relocation within City Hall. The collection is a one-of-a-kind, irreplaceable set of paintings from the WPA program. The Murals located at Ben Franklin School and the City Hall Concert Hall were never conserved. The Ben Franklin murals have damage and are peeling from the walls and require conservation. The Concert Hall murals varnish has darkened significantly and requires conservation.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design



15,000 52,000


Other/Contingency


15.000 52,000

REVENUE (Specify)


NET COST 12,000 25,000

15,000 52,000

CAPITAL BUDGET I-9

I-10 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: WPA Murals 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X__ No __ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $12,300___ Approved _$12,000________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? The costs requested for 2014/15 were developed from a conditions assessment report by the Sylvester Group, LLC. The 2015/16 request is an estimate based on past work with painting conservators. As is the 2017/18 request. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _____________________________________________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. The WPA murals were restored over 20 years ago and have not been focused on since that time. The Arts Commission in conjunction with the Historical Commission are working together to ensure the ongoing viability of the murals. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? The murals could be damaged irreparably. The murals are a collection of national importance and are irreplaceable.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Cemetery Conservation/Restoration PROJECT LIFE: 75-100 years SCHEDULED START: July 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2019

RANKING: 6 x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: 2015/16 - $ 40,000 – Restoration of 42 damaged headstones. 2017/18 - $ 40,000 – Conservation of 48 Colonial Brownstone tombstones 2018/19 - $ 60,000 – Restoration of iron fencing, roadways and installation of interpretive signage

JUSTIFICATION: Pine Island is the largest of the four city owned historic cemeteries and needs restoration to be a viable historic asset, tourist destination and adjunct to Mathews Park & the LM Mansion Museum. This continues the State funded conservation study from 2002 and work already implemented. Volunteers have reset over 400 headstones. Volunteers have also done brush clearing, tree trimming and plantings. The other three city-owned cemeteries are in good condition and may only need repair from isolated damage. Cemetery care and restoration has been an ongoing project for the Commission and has received positive interest from the community and tourists. Continued work will greatly enhance the safety, appearance and appeal to the public.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction


Other/Contingency 71,000 40,000 40,000 60,000 211,000


REVENUE (Specify)


NET COST 71,000 40,000 40,000 60,000 211,000

CAPITAL BUDGET I-11

I-12 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Cemetery Conservation/Restoration 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No __ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ______$35,000_______ Approved $________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

These costs are based on recent cemetery stone restoration quotes and work that has been done in other cemeteries. The previous work has been put out as an RFP and based on competitive bids as will future work.

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _____________________________________________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. It is a long standing policy of the City to provide public access to Norwalk’s parks. Once stones begin to sprawl or break, they are at greater risk of further damage from lawn mowers, vandals and neglect. Increasingly our historic sites and cemeteries are being visited by people searching for information about their ancestors or by scholars researching Norwalk’s history and it’s relationship to the state and surrounding communities. Restoration of Norwalk’s cemeteries has been a long standing City project that needs to continue. Pine Island is part of Oyster Shell Park, Mathews Park and contributing to the Bike Trail. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? The stones will incur further deterioration and in many cases, the names, information, and decorative elements that are part of our history and culture will be lost as the stone chips and sprawls.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: LMMM Improvement Project PROJECT LIFE: 75-100 years SCHEDULED START: July 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2030

RANKING: 7 _x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: 2015/16 - $25,000 – Critical rewiring needs 2016/17 - $60,000 – New sanitary sewer connection required by DPW 2017/18 - $225,000 – New ADA Ramp to first floor and basement egress (assumes $150,000 additional from state grant) 2018/19 - $150,000 – Master Plan improvements 2019/20 - $250,000 – Master Plan improvements

JUSTIFICATION: The City and LMMM non-profit have been working with the State and preservation architects to preserve, conserve and restore the Mansion while making it accessible and ADA compliant for over a decade. Funding through State grants, the Mansion Board and the City of Norwalk have enabled work to date, which includes new electrical service (to the panel only), ADA compliant bathrooms and installation of an elevator. A master plan that includes the upgrade of infrastructure systems (wiring, plumbing, code compliance, etc.) has been developed with an estimated cost exceeding $7M to implement. The LMMM Board will be raising significant funds through private donations and grants but will need some city funds to make improvements to the building.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL



Construction 110,000 25,000 60,000 225,000 150,000 250,000 795,000


Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify) State Grant 754,000 754,000

Previous Capital Budget 143,000 853,000

NET COST (611,000) 25,000 60,000 225,000 150,000 250,000 (99,000)

CAPITAL BUDGET I-13

I-14 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: LMMM Improvement Project 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No __ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _____________________________________________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. It is a long-standing policy of the City to provide public access to the waterfront and parks to the community and tourists. This project preserves one of America’s Treasures as identified by the Federal Government and the City of Norwalk and saves it from further destruction and deterioration, as well improving access in accordance with federal and state requirements. The restoration and upgrades will increase the Mansion’s ability to provide programs, resources and to attract tourists to Norwalk and promoting the City as a significant tourist destination. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? The building will not be in compliance with current ADA standards, compromising the Mansion’s programming and ability to secure future funding that is dependent upon meeting current accessibility standards. Delayed funding will result in delayed progress, which will in the future.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Barn/Smith Street Buildings PROJECT LIFE: 50-75 years SCHEDULED START: July 2014 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2019

RANKING: 8 x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: 2015/16 - $10,000 – Replace rotted sills on barn and additional siding replacement. 2016/17 - $100,000 – Additional funds required to complete restoration of jail and open to the public. 2018/19 - $20,000 – Insulate and rough enclosure of walls in barn, add bathroom, and hvac.

JUSTIFICATION: The jail and barn are in the heart of the Wall Street re-development plan and require extensive repairs and restoration. Extensive restoration work on the Barn has been completed funded largely by FEMA funds after damage from Hurricane Sandy, however rotted sill plates on two sides still requires repair. The repairs to the jail after fire damage have been underway, funded from insurance proceeds. Additional repairs and addressing extensive deferred maintenance to properly restore the building for future use will require additional funding beyond the insurance proceeds from the fire. Requesting a $250,000 Urban Action Grant from the state in conjunction with the Head of the Harbor project for exterior ADA access and hardscape improvements around these two buildings in 2015.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction/Restoration 10,000 10,000 100,000 20,000 140,000


Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify) 282,000 282,000

Previous Capital Budget 10,000 140,000

NET COST (272,000) 10,000 100,000 20,000 (142,000)

CAPITAL BUDGET I-15

I-16 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Barn/Smith Street Buildings 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No __ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request _____0___________ Approved $______0______ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

The cost to repair and restore the Barn was derived from working with contractors and the City’s handyman to define the work and obtain quotes in preparation for the budget request and/or insurance claims.

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _____________________________________________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. This work is necessary to repair recent storm damage to the barn. In the event that the City’s insurance or FEMA claims are denied, the Commission will need to fund the repair work. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? The Barn structure is in jeopardy as the result of significant tree damage to the roof after a tree from the back side of Mill Hill fell on it during Super storm Sandy. Damage to the roof, walls and interior support are required.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Cemetery Site Work PROJECT LIFE: 25-50 years SCHEDULED START: July 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: On-Going

RANKING: 9 _ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: 2015/16 – $10,000 - Repair of Stone Walls at Brookside Cemetery; tree removal at Kellogg-Comstock Cemetery 2017/18 – $10,000 - Repair of Stone Walls at Pine Island Cemetery; tree removal and trimming at Pine Island 2019/20 – $10,000 - Tree Removal and trimming at Brookside Cemetery and Mill Hill Cemetery

JUSTIFICATION: Several of our cemeteries have historic stone walls that have not been maintained and/or have been damaged by tree falls and require repair. Additionally, the timely removal and pruning of trees is more cost effective than to repair the damage incurred when strong storms result in downed trees or branches. The last three major storms: Irene, Halloween 2011 and Sandy have resulted in excess of $7,000 in damage to tombstones and additional damage to city-owned buildings (the Barn $25K) and a private residence next to Brookside. Extensive work was completed in 2013 at Mill Hill and Pine Island largely related to storm damage. Additional work will be needed in the next five years at Brookside, Kellogg-Comstock, Pine Island and Mill Hill.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design

Site Costs & Acquisition 25,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 55,000

Construction


Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)


NET COST 25,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 55,000

CAPITAL BUDGET I-17

I-18 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Cemetery Site Work 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X__ No __ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ___$10,000_____________ Approved $_______ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Based on quotes for comparable work at similar sites. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No x___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _____________________________________________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. The site work at Norwalk’s cemeteries will ensure the protection of our historic assets and limit future damage that can be offset by this preventative maintenance. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Based on recent weather trends and the impact on our local cemetery sites, we anticipate that Norwalk will continue to suffer significant storm damage as trees are weakened by strong winds, ice or other storm damage. As a result, we expect significantly

higher expense to repair damage as it occurs rather than providing proper site maintenance and preventative care. Public Safety is compromised.

.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Mill Hill Buildings PROJECT LIFE: 50-75 years SCHEDULED START: July 2016 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2017


DESCRIPTION: 2016/17 – $150,000 – Complete repointing of the Town House with Lime based mortar, repair and replacement of damaged brick. $ 75,000 – Remove asphalt shingles and replace with historically correct, fire-retardant cedar shingles; reconstruct original “yankee gutters” and down spouts.

JUSTIFICATION: In 1962, the Town House was repointed using Portland Cement mortar, which is harder than the non-fired bricks used in the construction of the Town House in 1835. Moisture from the freeze-thaw process is causing the bricks to fail instead of the mortar. The bricks are falling apart and will ultimately compromise both the structural and historic integrity of the walls and building. Additionally, the cedar shingle roof was replaced with asphalt shingles sometime in the 1970s or 80s, and the “yankee gutters” were covered up. The roof is leaking, damaging the building and needs replacement. The lack of gutters is causing moisture issues in the wood floors of the main room of the Town House. This work is consistent with the recommendations made in our master plan of preservation completed in 2010, which reviewed all of our historic buildings, including the Town House. A matching state grant will be sought for partial funding of this project.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction & Restoration 22,000 225,000 247,000


Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)


NET COST 22,000 225,000 247,000

CAPITAL BUDGET I-19

I-20


DEPARTMENT Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Mill Hill Buildings 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _X_ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request _______________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

Based on quotes for similar work on other sites and past repairs.

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _____________________________________________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. The buildings at Mill Hill are currently used for educational programming and special events open to the public. Ongoing maintenance and repairs are required to ensure the proper protection of these historic assets as well as public safety. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? The buildings are in need of periodic repair of rotted wood, moisture damage and preventative maintenance in order to maintain and preserve the buildings for public access and future activities. If these repairs and maintenance activities are not performed, the buildings will incur further damage and deterioration.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Museum Collection Archive/Cataloguing PROJECT LIFE: 75–100 years SCHEDULED START: July 2016 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: On-Going


DESCRIPTION: 2016-17 - $10,000 – archival storage items and conservation services 2018-19 - $10,000 – archival storage items and conservation services

JUSTIFICATION: The City owns a significant museum collection of objects including paintings, furniture, pottery, china and other items valued at over $5M. Proper care and conservation of the collection objects is critical to preserving their value for future generations.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Furnishings 20,000 10,000 10,000 40,000

Other/Contingency – Consultant 33,000 33,000

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 53,000 10,000 10,000 73,000

REVENUE (Specify)


NET COST 53,000 10,000 10,000 73,000

CAPITAL BUDGET I-21

I-22 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Historical Commission PROJECT TITLE: Museum Collection Archive/Cataloguing 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes x___ No __ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived?

Amount is based on current hourly rates for qualified museum/archival consultant.

3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ___ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget _____________________________________________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. Before the collection can be safely and properly relocated, a catalogue of the objects and archives needs to be completed and items require proper packing and storage. An experienced, qualified consultant will ensure that the proper care and procedures are followed to safeguard the collection and archives for future use. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? Without a proper inventory or catalogue of the collection and archives, any potential relocation would be significantly impacted, resulting in ongoing fees and expenses to keep the collection in its current location.


DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency

PROJECT TITLE

2015-16 REQUEST

2016-17 REQUEST

2017-18 REQUEST

2018-19 REQUEST

2019-20 REQUEST

1. Choice Neighborhood District 1,300 500

2. Public Art 25

3. Affordable Housing 500 500 500 500

4. TOD Complete Street Improvements 1,200 1,000 1,000 1,000

5. Bikeway Planning and Construction 250 250 250 250

6. Façade Improvements 160 160 160 160

7. North Water Street Lighting 200 200

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

TOTAL 1,325 2,610 2,110 2,110 1,910


DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: Choice Neighborhoods District

PROJECT LIFE: 30 Years SCHEDULED START: July 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2019

RANKING: 1 NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: The infrastructure improvements in the Choice Neighborhood District identified, engineered and estimated by Tighe & Bond include relocation of neighborhood utilities underground and the removal of all utility poles, installation of historic lighting, upgrading sanitary systems and storm water systems to improve area drainage, raising roadbeds to reduce area flooding, granite curbing, concrete sidewalks with decorative paving, street trees and pedestrian amenities. These improvements are all in addition to the public improvements being required of the proposed developers, both the Washington Village housing development as well as proposed private development currently approved for the neighborhood. The proposed final design and engineering has been completed for these improvements so cited costs are for construction. The construction of these improvements must be completed within 18 months of the project closing anticipated to take place in the first quarter of 2015.

JUSTIFICATION: The Choice Neighborhood District in South Norwalk is the recipient of $30 million in HUD Federal funding for the transformation of that neighborhood through the replacement of the Washington Village public housing with a complex of mixed income multi-family housing structures on that site as well as two other Day Street sites. The Choice Neighborhood Plan also requires a substantial amount of additional infrastructure improvements not included in the proposed development projects that have been identified, engineered and estimated by Tighe and Bond to cost approximately $7 million. These public improvements are not eligible for HUD grant funding. The State has committed $3.5 million from Disaster Relief funds with a possible additional $1 million, but there still remains a gap. The Agency will also be seeking Urban Act funds to support this need. These infrastructure improvements are not only critical to support the immediate Washington Village housing replacement project, but also are needed to enable private development investment in both the near and long term to bring long under-performing District parcels to higher and better uses.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-2016

2016-2017

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019-2020

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 1,300 500 1,800


Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,300 500 1,800

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 1,300 500 1,800 CAPITAL BUDGET

J-1

J-2 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: Choice Neighborhoods District 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ____ No _X_ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__________________ Approved _$__________________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Final design & engineering of public improvements completed by Tighe & Bond in 2014 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____ No X___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. The public improvements requested are critical to support the Choice Neighborhoods Washington Village replacement project funded through the HUD Federal funding and to enable future private investment in the District. These improvements are those currently not funded in the housing development projects, but are partially funded through State funding support.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? The Washington Village Housing development project will not obtain construction financing and will not be able to obtain Certificates of Occupancy. The public infrastructure component of Choice Neighborhoods developments is not eligible for CNI grant funding.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: Public Art

PROJECT LIFE: 30 years SCHEDULED START: July 2015 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Oct. 2017


DESCRIPTION: Capital Budget public art funding would be used to support the creation and installation of public art in different mediums in public venues throughout the City. These funds would also be available to leverage applications for grant funding from both public and private sources. .

JUSTIFICATION: The Redevelopment Agency at the request of the Mayor’s South Norwalk Task Force to provide funding for public art directly or to have funds available to leverage as a match in application for grant funding. In fact, prior Capital Budget public art funded was successfully used a leverage for a National Endowment for the Arts grant of $50,000 for the Gateway to Norwalk West Avenue public art installation currently in production and scheduled for installation in 2015. Public art installations around the City of Norwalk enhance these spaces attract visitors and improve the quality of the public environment.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL


Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)

Federal & State grants

NET COST 25 25 50

CAPITAL BUDGET -J3-

-J4- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: Public Art 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__25________________ Approved $__00 If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Past experience with actual art installations 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

Public art is a recognized enhancement for public spaces attracting pedestrian traffic, visitor expenditures and improved quality of public space experiences


The City of Norwalk will not benefit from the real value of public art investments which benefit Norwalk residents and commercial businesses alike and Norwalk will lack the available resources to seek public and /or private financial support for public art installations. .

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: Affordable Housing PROJECT LIFE: 30 Years SCHEDULED START: July 2004 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2034

RANKING: 3 n/a NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT n/a REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: The Norwalk Redevelopment Agency is seeking capital budget funding to carry out the provisions of the City of Norwalk’s Housing Strategy which was approved by the Common Council in 2010. In FY15 the Agency will undertake a number of activities related to the preservation of Norwalk’s affordable housing stock. These activities will include but will not be limited to: the rehabilitation of existing affordable housing units; financing mechanisms to foster homeownership among low- and moderate-income households, preserve and extend existing affordable housing deed restrictions, continued support of the Norwalk Housing Authority’s Choice Neighborhoods Initiative to redevelop Washington Village/South Norwalk; and the development and implementation of a pilot program that will support the rehabilitation, responsible management and preservation of affordability of small multi family properties around the South Norwalk Train Station.

JUSTIFICATION: The Affordable Housing activities undertaken by the Agency represent the key means by which the City of Norwalk seeks to achieve the goals and objectives in the Housing Strategy. This strategy underscores the importance of maintaining Norwalk’s existing affordable housing inventory, particularly critical in light of the implications of CGS 8-30g. Under this act, any municipality in which less than 10% of the housing stock is affordable to low- and moderate-income households bears the burden of defending rejections of developers’ applications to build affordable housing. The Agency’s affordable housing related activities are critical to maintaining Norwalk’s existing supply of affordable housing, which is currently 11% of its total housing inventory. Moreover, the Agency’s affordable housing activities are consistent with the Housing Strategy’s emphasis on the importance of utilizing the financial resources dedicated to affordable housing in a cost efficient manner. The aforementioned activities are considered by the Common Council as both cost effective and appropriate investment strategies in meeting the City’s objective of preserving its existing stock of affordable housing.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2016-17

TOTAL

Construction

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency 2,820 0 500 500 500 500 4,820

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,820 0 500 500 500 500 4,820

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 2,820 0 500 500 500 500 4,820

CAPITAL BUDGET -J5-

-J6- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: Affordable Housing 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $500,000______________________ Approved $250,000________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Agency’s cost estimate is based on actual cost of Agency’s previous years’ affordable housing activities and future plans. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No _x _ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions 0 D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 5. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

The Agency’s affordable housing related activities for which this funding is requested are essential to the implementation of the City’s Housing Strategy which was approved by the Common Council in 2010. Affordable housing has consistently been cited as a “high priority” in the Agency’s CDBG citizen participation process. Capital budget funding provides the Agency with a critical source of funds which it leverages with funding from various sources including the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Connecticut Department of Housing (formerly Dept. of Economic and Community Development), private foundations and other state and federal resources.


The Agency’s affordable housing activities are critical to maintaining and growing the supply of affordable housing in Norwalk. If this program is deferred or not funded, the City is likely to witness a significant loss in the number of affordable housing units, especially quality affordable housing units. Without a corresponding addition of new affordable housing units, the loss would result in a drop in the percentage of Norwalk’s housing stock that is deemed to be affordable, leaving Norwalk below the 10% threshold that allows its exemption from 8-30g.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: TOD Complete Streets Improvements

PROJECT LIFE: 30 years SCHEDULED START: July 2014 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Oct 2016


DESCRIPTION:The highest priority pedestrian access improvements include (a) the construction of a sidewalk on the east side of the access drive to the South Norwalk Railroad Station eastbound station (350’ with crosswalks) and (b) the improvements to the two stairways (including stairway replacement, landscaping and lighting) providing direct Station access from the terminus of Clay Street and Hamilton Street in the Golden Hill neighborhoods. The project also includes design and construction of bicycle accessible corridors in the South Norwalk neighborhood connecting to points feeding into the neighborhood. The design, engineering and bid documents for these improvements are included in a CTDOT TOD Pilot Program grant for complete streets design scheduled to commence in 2013 and be completed in 2014 and in a Sustainable Communities Initiative HUD Planning Grant also scheduled to be completed in 2014. Capital budget assistance is requested to construct these improvements.

JUSTIFICATION: The South Norwalk Railroad Station Area TOD Strategy (approved October 2011) clearly identifies safe, convenient and attractive “complete” streets access within the South Norwalk station neighborhood as a key component to maximizing the economic benefits of the transit center. Improvements to critical pedestrian/bicycle access points is a primary recommendation of the Master Plan to encourage area walkability, decreases in traffic volumes in the neighborhood and enhanced appeal for private investment in district residential and commercial development.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2016-20

TOTAL

Construction 1,360 0 1,200 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,560

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,360 0 1,200 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,560

REVENUE (Specify)

Federal & State grants 686 0 500 500 500 500 2,686

NET COST 674 0 700 500 500 500 2,874

CAPITAL BUDGET -J7-

-J8- 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: TOD Complete Streets Improvements 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__1,360,000________________ Approved $__1,360,000 If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Construction costs are cost estimates provided by the CTDOT Pilot Program consultants, CDM Smith, based on actual designs. Stair construction $600,000. Monroe Street sidewalk completion with crosswalks and light replacement $530,000, crosswalks and sharrows $150,000. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 6. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

The TOD Master Plan identified designed shared use of South Norwalk streets for vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists as an immediate need. The implementation of a program of “complete” streets is a high priority for both Federal and State investment. These improvements serve a significant and growing neighborhood population to access the South Norwalk station and the mixed-income population demographic that the City is seeking to attract.


Pedestrians would continue to use access ways that are not safe and convenient or would choose to drive to the SoNo station. The South Norwalk Station neighborhood would not be considered as walkable and/or bike friendly by the very population the City is seeking to attract. It would also be an indicator that the City is not prepared to implement TOD Master Plan recommendations.


DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: Bikeway Planning and Construction

PROJECT LIFE: 30 Years SCHEDULED START: July 2016 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2034

RANKING: 5 NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION Multi-year funding is requested for the redesign of existing street networks to provide a variety of solutions for accommodating and promoting safe and convenient bicycle traffic ranging from traffic lane restriping, pavement markings, construction of dedicated bike lanes, bike racks, cyclist facilities within transit stations and appropriate signage throughout the network. Funding would also be used for identifying, designing and constructing multi-use bicycle trails within other public right of ways and parks to connect the transportation network for all users.

JUSTIFICATION: Bicycle use in Norwalk is steadily increasing, both for commuting and for recreational use. Several factors influence this shift including increased environmental awareness, health and fitness concerns and general attitudes regarding vehicle ownership particular among younger Americans. “Complete Streets”, the current benchmark in street design, is multi-modal seeking to improve access and connectivity to all users, transit, vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians, and is a tool to revitalize Norwalk’s urban centers. The existing City roadway network with narrow travel lanes and high volume of fast traffic demand flexible and creative solutions to accommodate bicycles, a need clearly identified in the approved Norwalk Connectivity Master Plan.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-2016

2016-2017

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019-2020

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction 250 250 250 250 1,000


Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 250 250 250 250 1,000

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 250 250 250 250 1,000 CAPITAL BUDGET

J-9

J-10 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: Bikeway Planning and Construction 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ____ No __ x_ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__________________ Approved _$__________________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue _________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.


2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: Façade Improvements

PROJECT LIFE: 30 years SCHEDULED START: July 2014 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: October 2020

RANKING: 6 __ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION:

Façade improvement programs, and closely related building rehabilitation programs, are usually

developed and managed cities with a vested interest in civic improvement. The “Focus on Norwalk ”

program is being created … as part of an overall redevelopment program to improve the quality of

life n the urban corridor. The Program is designed to assist any property and business owners in

rehabilitating the commercial façades of their properties or any significant component of the

streetscape impacted by their business for the purpose of creating a positive visual impact,

stimulating private investment, and complementing other community development efforts.”

The eligibility criteria is open to both property owners and tenants with owner permission. The

related assistance is to be structured as both a loans and grants depending on the related

underwriting of the business expressing interest in the program and the scale of their improvement.

All applications however will require a dollar for dollar match associated with the requested funding

from the program. The maximum investment made by the program is capped at $15,000 for a grant

and $30,000 for a loan. Loan are intended to be structured as principal repayment only. All

improvements associated with the program will require coordination with Agency staff and Agency

design review approval

JUSTIFICATION:

The revitalization of a neglected commercial district or residential neighborhood often begins with

improvements to a single building or storefront. Even simple changes such as the removal of non-

historic materials, repairs, or a new paint job that calls attention to the building’s original

architectural details signal positive change and often stimulate similar improvements in

neighboring buildings. While this process sometimes begins spontaneously through the work of

individual property or business owners, it can be significantly accelerated when a community

creates a façade improvement program. As a result, such programs are frequently among the

implementing actions of comprehensive plans, downtown revitalization strategies, and historic

preservation plans. Façade improvement programs are incentive programs created to encourage

property owners and businesses to improve the exterior appearance of their buildings and

storefronts. They focus typically on either commercial or residential properties in historic or non-

historic areas and provide financial incentives such as a matching grant or loan and design

assistance.

Façade improvement programs produce many benefits – including strengthening locally owned

businesses which help keep dollars in the local economy.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2015-20

TOTAL

Construction 160 160 160 160 640

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 160 160 160 160 640

REVENUE (Specify)

Federal & State grants 10 10 10 10 40

NET COST TO CITY 150 150 150 150 600

CAPITAL BUDGET J-11

J-12 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: Façade Improvement Program 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No _ X_ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__________________ Approved $__ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Comparative analysis of communities that are of a similar size to Norwalk and a review of the federal and state grant awards for such programs as it relates to local match. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 7. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

The funding remaining in the current Façade Improvement account is almost fully expended. There is a renewed political will to focus on the needs of the businesses that exist within both SoNo and Wall Street and this type of investment is immediate in nature and has tangible returns. It was also a recommendation that came out of the Agency’s SoNo Retail strategy as a means by which the area could be reinvigorated to attract more retail related tenants.


Both Wall Street and SoNo will continue to struggle commercially and the immediate improvements to the physical environment of these areas that could be realized by a façade improvement program will come more methodically through direct private investment. Such improvement may or may not be considered visually beneficial.

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: North Water Street Lighting PROJECT LIFE: 20 years SCHEDULED START: July 2013 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: July 2020

RANKING: 7 X__NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: The existing electrical connections have been mapped and cleaned out identifying usable power sources and repairing old sources that were damaged by Hurricane Sandy. Existing lighting that has flooded has been removed. The design and implementation of proposed lighting components would include new bollard placements along the pergola sidewalk; wiring and installation of lighting on the interior of the pergola seating area, wiring and lighting on the waterfront deck covering the siphon chamber and lighting on the landscaped island across from the Aquarium. The intent of the lighting design is to create a safe and comfortable outdoor gathering place for the neighborhood and for Maritime visitors.

JUSTIFICATION: The seating areas along North Water Street adjacent to the Maritime Aquarium at the start of the Heritage Park trail are very attractive to the public and provide access to the Norwalk riverfront. Lighting along the walkway, in the pergola structure and even the street lights is either completely non-existent or not functioning. As a result, the park-like environment that could be an attraction for the neighborhood is unsafe after sundown which prohibits neighborhood use of these public open spaces which is the most effective deterrent against crime.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL


Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 200 200 200 600

REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 200 200 200 600

CAPITAL BUDGET -J13-

-J14- 2012-2013

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Redevelopment Agency PROJECT TITLE: North Water Street Lighting 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _x__ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__200,000______________________ Approved $__200,000___________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimates were derived from existing costs of electrical work to date on site, actual costs for lighting project recently completed in South Norwalk and actual lighting designer proposals. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 8. Comment on the demand/need for this project. South Norwalk is an extremely active destination for dining and entertainment. There is an increasing

residential population both anticipated and under construction. This creates a need for vigilance for public safety and concern for the attractive condition of the network of open spaces in South Norwalk. Lighting is a critical factor in creating the safe, convenient and attractive streetscape that the South Norwalk businesses require.

9. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? The darkness of open areas along North Water Street at the start of the Heritage

Trail will be a deterrent to any public activity in those areas. Perceived and/or actual concern for personal safety renders the public open spaces along the Norwalk River useless rather than being the environmental assets that they could be.


DEPARTMENT: Information Technology

PROJECT TITLE

2015-16 REQUEST

2016-17 REQUEST

2017-18 REQUEST

2018-19 REQUEST

2019-20 REQUEST

1. Citywide IT Projects 647,000 254,000 246,000 195,000 232,000

2. GIS 13,000 17,000 254,000

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

TOTAL 660,000 371,000 500,000 195,000 232,000

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Information Technology PROJECT TITLE: Citywide IT Projects PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: SCHEDULED COMPLETION:

RANKING: 1 _X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: City-wide technology and infrastructure projects encompassing City departments, Public Safety, Libraries, and Public Works. This request incorporates 17 capital technology projects across City departments and organizations. Public safety projects comprise $123,996; Library projects comprise $54,475; City wide projects comprise $408,473.

JUSTIFICATION: Progressive capital innovations and enhancements to the City’s data management systems, electronic service delivery, and infrastructure are necessary to maintain the quality, integrity and reliability of the City’s information system which enable City staff to efficiently deliver services to the public.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials 2,413,800 647,000 254,000 246,000 195,000 232,000 3,987,800

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,413,800 647,000 254,000 246,000 195,000 232,000 3,987,800

REVENUE

NET COST 2,413,800 647,000 254,000 246,000 195,000 232,000 3,987,800

CAPITAL BUDGET K-1

K-2 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Information Technology PROJECT TITLE: Citywide IT Projects 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes __X_ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $________________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.


2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Information Technology PROJECT TITLE: GIS PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: SCHEDULED COMPLETION:

RANKING: 2 X_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT _X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Large Format printer

JUSTIFICATION: To print large scale color maps, plans, aerial photography and plans. Current model is approaching 10 years of age and exhibiting signs of age. Replace before parts and supplies become obsolete.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction

Equipment/Materials 65,500 13,000 17,000 254,000 349,500

Other/Contingency


REVENUE

NET COST 65,500 13,000 17,000 254,000 349,500

CAPITAL BUDGET K-3

K-4 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Information Technology PROJECT TITLE: GIS 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes __X_ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $________________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No X___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.


The printer will eventually stop working.

Page 1

Page 1 Capital Requests IT 2015 2016 final version

12/10/2014 Information Technology 2015 2016 Capital Budget Request Detail

Requested By: Project / Initiative Priority 2015-2016 Comments 2016-17 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021

City-wide Website Enhancements Critical $50,000 front end re-branding consistent with Norwalk Econimic development and

$10,000.00 $10,000.00

City-wide Desktop and Printing Technology Refresh Critical $91,173Continuing to refresh PCs and printers for City Hall, Fire, Police, the Libraries, Public Works $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00

City-wide Consolidated Server Refresh Critical $16,500 Refresh of five year cycle $16,500 $16,500 $16,500 $16,500 $16,500City-wide Enhanced security software for desktops and servers Critical $29,800 Strengthen existing products - multilayer approach $25,000.00 $25,000.00

City-wide Doc Mgmt system, scanning and indexing (all depts) High $150,000Moved in from DPW budget request. Includes old drawings, maps, index cards, documents, etc $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00

City-wide PC and phone distribution switch replacements (c 2006) Critical $24,000 Original to building rewiring - circa 2005 $24,000.00 $12,000.00City-wide Risk Assessment/Vulnerability Testing Critical $35,000 Assess infrastructure and process risks. Formulate recommendations and

GIS GIS Large format printer High $13,000 printing large scale color maps, aerial photos from GIS; current printer 2007. $13,000.00Recreation and ParksEnhanced weather camera for beach license plate reader High $12,000 better high/low light reading. PUBLIC SAFETY Police Video storage Critical $4,000 Ongoing addition to meet video retention requirements $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Police PC and phone distribution switch replacements (c 2006) Critical $25,176 Original to the PD building. Starting to show signs of port failure $25,176.00 Police Mobile Data Terminals in Patrol vehicles Critical $46,320 Continuation of refresing 12 units per year $46,320 $46,320 $46,320 $46,320 $46,320 Police 2-layer authentiction for MDTs (CJIS requirement) Critical $25,000 Password plus a device or finger print. Mandated for CT. Dispatch 911 Recording system enhancements (verint) Critical $23,500 Turn-key solution from vendor. To support E911 text, video, email. Last upgrade $23,500.00Library Self-check out kiosk High $10,000 Initial project, if successful, will add another kiosk next year. $10,000.00Library Sierra database upgrade server Critical $23,000 Current server approaching end of life $23,000.00Library Public Access Computer Refresh Critical $21,475 Revolving schedule to refresh a portion of the public access computers each $21,475 $21,475 $21,475 $21,475 $21,475Health Environmental Software Replacement Critical $60,000 current software unreliable; company in financial difficulty.

Sub Total $659,944 $253,471 $245,295 $194,295 $231,295 $205,795Offset

Grand total $659,944

City Wide requests + all others $408,473GIS requests $13,000Library requests $54,475Public Safety $123,996Health Dept $60,000

$659,944


DEPARTMENT: Health Department

PROJECT TITLE

2015-16 REQUEST

2016-17 REQUEST

2017-18 REQUEST

2018-19 REQUEST

2019-20 REQUEST

1. Oil Tank Replacement 30,000

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

TOTAL 30,000

2015-2016 CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT: Health PROJECT TITLE: Weights and Measures Oil Tank

Replacement PROJECT LIFE: 30 years SCHEDULED START: 7/1/15 SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 7/1/45

RANKING: critical __ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: Replacement of the oil tank and trailer used by the Sealer of Weights and Measures. The tank and trailer were stolen from the City Health parking lot in November 2014.

JUSTIFICATION: This is a State mandated activity.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design


Construction


Other/Contingency


REVENUE (Specify)

NET COST 30,000 30,000

CAPITAL BUDGET L-1

L-2 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Health PROJECT TITLE: Emergency Notification 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes ___ No_x _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $________________________ Approved $_____________ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ __ No _x__ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue ________________ B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs ________________ No. of new positions __________________ D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.

The oil tank trailer was stolen from the City Hall parking lot and has not been found. In order to conduct the state mandated inspection of oil trucks, a new tank must be purchased before the 2015 heating season.

5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? There are 14 oil companies doing business in Norwalk. Currently there are 67 trucks tested for accuracy of meters and the revenue generated from the inspections is $5,025 per year. If not funded, the oil trucks doing business in Norwalk cannot be inspected, the amount of oil sold may be inaccurate and there will be a revenue shortfall of at least $5,000.


DEPARTMENT: Human Relations

PROJECT TITLE

2015-16 REQUEST

2016-17 REQUEST

2017-18 REQUEST

2018-19 REQUEST

2019-20 REQUEST

1. ADA Compliance 345,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

TOTAL 345,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000


DEPARTMENT: HUMAN RELATIONS AND FAIR RENT PROJECT TITLE: ADA Compliance

PROJECT LIFE: SCHEDULED START: SCHEDULED COMPLETION:

RANKING: __ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT __ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT

DESCRIPTION: See Attached project by project estimate Request to further the City’s work to comply with our Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance and Transition Plan. Abatement of an additional thirty-six (36) of the two hundred and twenty-two (222) identified barriers to the public’s access to municipal programs (see attached excerpt from the City’s ADA Compliance and Transition Plan).

This request includes substantial upgrades to accessibility in City Hall including emergency egress routes, way-finding signage to entrances and accessible restrooms, some work to make restrooms accessible, and following up on our requests from last year to design assisted listening systems in major public meeting rooms, this year we are requesting funding to implement those designs. We are also looking to expand our assisted listening program to meeting rooms used by the public and the public schools on the third floor of City Hall and at the Police Station. We are also seeking funding for curb cuts at various public buildings and to extend handrails that are non-compliant in various places around the City.

We also request funding to implement building access projects that are in queue for design now at Jefferson, Columbus, and Norwalk High School.

Finally, we request additional funding for ADA Accessibility work at the Senior Center. Although the Senior Center is operated by a non-governmental entity, it is housed in a building owned and maintained by the City and is a program substantially funded by the City. Importantly, many municipalities provide similar services as part of a core municipal program. These projects include substantial work to make the bathrooms accessible and to design assisted listening systems for three rooms in which public programs are run.

JUSTIFICATION: As a public entity, the City should strive to have all its programs and service accessible to all its residents who wish to participate.

In addition, there are legal considerations and liabilities. The American with Disabilities Act requires that we make our programs and services accessible to persons with disabilities.

Norwalk is playing catch-up with its ADA responsibilities and is therefore obligated to take substantial steps towards the completion of the projects outlined in the City’s ADA Compliance and Transition Plan. Under the ADA the City must correct violations of the ADA unless to do so would impose “an undue administrative or financial burden” on the City.


PRIOR YEARS

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

TOTAL

Engineering/Design 58,000 15,500 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 213,500


Construction 442,000 329,500 315,000 315,000 315,000 315,000 2,021,500

Equipment/Materials

Other/Contingency

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 500,000 345,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 2,245,000

REVENUE (Specify) *Although not calculated yet, the state will partially reimburse education related expenses.

NET COST 500,000 345,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 2,245,000

CAPITAL BUDGET M-1

M-2 2015-2016

CITY OF NORWALK DEPARTMENT : Human Relations and Fair Rent PROJECT TITLE: ADA Compliance 1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan? Yes _X_ No _ _ If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $382,000_____________ Approved $250,000__ If not, why is the project now included? 2. How was your cost estimate derived? The estimates for curb cuts were obtained from DPW personnel familiar with similar projects. Estimates for doors, signs, and paths were obtained from the Building Department. Estimates for park projects obtained from Recreation and Parks Department. Some estimates for design and construction related to bathrooms, dressing room, and seating in the Concert Hall were obtained from Gill & Gill Architects, LLC. Estimates for assisted listening system implementation were provided by JaffeHolden. Estimates for design of future assisted listening systems were based on prior similar contracts. The estimate for the implementation of Board of Education projects was roughly estimated by Human Relations and Fair Rent Department staff. 3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _ X_ No ___ If yes, please estimate the following: A. Increased Revenue Some of the projects will bring in additional capital funding based on the State’s partial reimbursement of capital expenses related to education.______________________

B. Decreased Operating Expenses ________________ C. Additional Salary Costs I have requested 22,000 for a part time (2/5) project manager for ADA and other projects D. Additional operating expenses ________________ Net effect on Operating Budget ________________ 4. Comment on the demand/need for this project. As noted above, this project will make our municipal programs and services more accessible to our residents who have disabilities as required by federal law. 5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?

A less welcoming city to people with disabilities, greater risk of injury on city property for people who are infirm or have disabilities, and increased liability of federal action.

1/13/2015

Dept. ID# DescriptionEstimated

Cost.Notes

Building

Mngmt1.1.4P

Emergency egress from Community Room. Non

compliant doors. $ 8,000

Provide 1 new set of compliant doors.

DPW/

Building

Mngmt

1.1.6;

1.1.17

City Hall: Wayfinding Signage from public

transportation and parking to City Hall and

Concert Hall (Accessible Route)

$5,000 Locations have been determined.

DPW/

Building

Mngmt

1.1.8City Hall: Create Directory of Access Services

and Resources$5,000 Determine content and location.

DPW/

Building

Mngmt1.1.10 City Hall Elevators: No audible Signals $1,000

If the elevator is not capable of generating audible

signals, we do not have to make it so. Building

mgmt is finding out the status.

DPW/

Building

Mngmt1.1.18

Concert Hall Restrooms: Substantial renovations

to make accessible$1,000

Install signage in rear lobby & concert hall

indicating accessible restrooms in City Hall atrium.

DPW/

Building

Mngmt

1.1.19Concert Hall: Non-Compliant Handrails on Stairs

to Balcony$14,000 Design and implementation.

DPW/

Building

Mngmt

1.1.21PConcert Hall Stage: stairs on emergency egress

route have a non-compliant handrail.$2,000

Install compliant handrail on one side and correct

non-compliant handrail on other.

City of Norwalk

Recommended ADA Transition Projects 2015-16

Page 1

1/13/2015


Cost.Notes

DPW/

Building

Mngmt

1.1.23P;

1.1.24P;

1.1.25P

Additional Wheel Chair Accessible Seating in

Concert Hall and other upgrades. Design &

implementation.

$10,500 Additional 6 wheel chair spaces for $2,500 and

$8,000 for handrails on outer aisle side walls.

DPW/

Building

Mngmt

1.1.22PEmergency egress from Concert Hall. Non

compliant doors. $ 16,000 Provide 2 new sets of compliant doors.

DPW/

Building

Mngmt

1.1.26P;

1.1.27P;

1.1.28P;

1.1.29P

Concert Hall Dressing Room: Correct threshhold,

redesign and renovate bathroom to accessibility

standards

$ 8,500 Design & implementation to bring facilities into

compliance.

IT/BOE N/AInstall ALD system in BOE Rooms: 300A, 330,

and 333. $ 30,000 Implimentation in process.

IT/Police N/A

Design ALD systems for Police HQ Community

Room, Press Room, and Chief's Conference

Room.

$ 7,500 Design in process.

Main

Library2.2.2P

No curb ramp and curb cut at head of access

aisle. $ 2,000

Connect handicap parking spaces to walkway with

ramps/curb cuts.

Police

Hdqtrs1.2.3P

Access route from parking to bldg entrance

interrupted by a curb. $ 2,000 Construct curb cut.

Police

Hdqtrs1.2.4

Install additional handrail in stairwell to

Conference Room on 3rd floor. $ 2,500 Conference room is occassionaly used by the public.

Police

Hdqtrs1.2.5P

Police HQ holding cell for handicapped requires

a grab bar for toilet. $ 1,000 Install grab bar.

Yankee

Doodle

Garage

1.7.4 No curb ramps at Burnell Blvd. entrance. $ 4,000 Install two curb ramps.

Recommended ADA Transition Projects 2015-16 (page 2)

Page 2

1/13/2015


Cost.Notes

Recs &

Parks3.4.13P

Mathews Park: Deteriorated walk at entrance to

playground.$5,000 Repair the walk.

Recs &

Parks

3.5.12;

3.5.13;

3.5.14;

3.5.15

Cranbury Park: construct accessible routes

(several). Route from main parking lot is CC.

Others to be done.

$40,000 This is for additional funding for the others that

need to be done.

DPW?

Sono

Station

1.5.2PRamp on route to elevator requires handrails.

Slope occassionally minorly exceeds 8.3%$1,500 Install handrails only? Or address slope?

DPW?

Sono Sta.

1.5.3P;

1.5.4P

Stairs to ticket counter and platform need

handrail extensions$3,000 Design and install extensions.

DPW?

Sono Sta.1.5.5 Stairs to Café have non-compliant handrails $3,000

Design and correct non-compliant partial handrail

and install additional handrail.

BOE

4.6.7;

4.7.2;

4.3.6

With pending design projects for the entrance at

Columbus and an egress at NHS (near the pool),

some funding should be set aside for

implementation of these projects

$75,000

Without the BOE's cost estimates as part of their

design work authorized in 2013-14, it is difficult to

estimate the cost of these projects. However, to

leave them out of the plan for 2015-16 would

hamper the City's ADA efforts as projects at the

schools are a major component of our unresolved

ADA compliance projects.

Senior

Center:

Allen Rd.

Design and implement compliant Women's and

Men's restrooms.$50,000

Survey of non-compliance completed. Design and

implementation to follow.

Senior

Center:

Allen Rd.

Design and implement Assisted Listening

Devices in 3 rooms: A, B, Gym, plus a mobile

system for smaller meetings.

$47,500 Design $7,500. Implement $40,000

ESTIMATED TOTAL $ 345,000

Recommended ADA Transition Projects 2015-16 (page 3)

Page 3

Documents

FY 2015-2016 CAPITAL BUDGET - Nancy On Norwalk€¦ · FY 2015-2016 CAPITAL BUDGET DEPARTMENT 2014-15 Project # Department Priority. Project Description Council Department Finance