Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    1/55

    Maxillary andMaxillary andPeriorbitalPeriorbital

    FracturesFracturesResident: Gordon Shields, MDResident: Gordon Shields, MD

    Faculty: Francis Quinn, MDFaculty: Francis Quinn, MD

    Grand Rounds January 7, 2003Grand Rounds January 7, 2003

    Department of Otolaryngology, UTMBDepartment of Otolaryngology, UTMB

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    2/55

    TypesTypes

    MechanismsMechanisms

    Associated InjuriesAssociated Injuries

    AnatomyAnatomy

    ClassificationClassification EvaluationEvaluation

    TreatmentTreatment

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    3/55

    TypesTypes

    LeFort or Maxillary fracturesLeFort or Maxillary fractures

    Zygomaticomaxillary complexZygomaticomaxillary complex

    fracturesfractures

    OrbitozygomaticomaxillaryOrbitozygomaticomaxillary

    complex fracturescomplex fractures

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    4/55

    MechanismsMechanisms

    AssaultAssault

    MVAMVA

    Gunshot woundsGunshot wounds

    SportsSports

    FallsFalls Industrial accidentsIndustrial accidents

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    5/55

    Associated InjuriesAssociated Injuries

    Brandt et al 1991Brandt et al 1991

    59% caused by MVA had59% caused by MVA had

    intracranial injuryintracranial injury

    10% caused by fall/beating had10% caused by fall/beating had

    intracranial injuryintracranial injury

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    6/55

    Associated injuriesAssociated injuries

    Haug et al 1990Haug et al 1990

    402 patients402 patients

    Zygoma fractures:Zygoma fractures: Lacerations 43%Lacerations 43%

    Orthopedic injuries 32%Orthopedic injuries 32%

    Additional facial fractures 22%Additional facial fractures 22%

    Neurologic injury 27%Neurologic injury 27%

    Pulmonary, abdominal, cardiac 7%, 4.1%,Pulmonary, abdominal, cardiac 7%, 4.1%,

    1%1%

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    7/55

    Maxillary fractures:Maxillary fractures:

    Lacerations and abrasions 75%Lacerations and abrasions 75%

    Orthopedic injury 51%Orthopedic injury 51%

    Other facial fractures 42%Other facial fractures 42%

    Neurologic injury 51%Neurologic injury 51%

    Pulmonary 13%, abdominal 5.7%,Pulmonary 13%, abdominal 5.7%,cardiac 3.8%cardiac 3.8%

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    8/55

    Ocular injuryOcular injury

    Al-Qurainy et al 1991Al-Qurainy et al 1991

    363 patients with midface fractures363 patients with midface fractures

    63% minor or transient ocular injury63% minor or transient ocular injury 16% moderately severe injury16% moderately severe injury

    12% severe ocular injury (angle recession,12% severe ocular injury (angle recession,

    retinal or vitreous injury, optic nerveretinal or vitreous injury, optic nerve

    damagedamage 90.6% of patients had some ocular injury90.6% of patients had some ocular injury

    2.5% lost vision in the affected eye2.5% lost vision in the affected eye

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    9/55

    Facial SkeletonFacial Skeleton

    From: Netter FH. Atlas of Human Anatomy. Second Edition; East Hanover,Novartis,1997, plt. 1

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    10/55

    Facial SkeletonFacial Skeleton

    From: Netter FH. Atlas of Human Anatomy. Second Edition; East Hanover,

    Novartis,1997, plt. 2

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    11/55

    OrbitOrbit

    7 bones composing the orbit: frontal, sphenoid,zygoma, maxilla, palatine, lacrimal, ethmoid

    From: Netter FH. Atlas of Human Anatomy. Second Edition; East Hanover,Novartis,1997, plt. 1

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    12/55

    Forces of masticationForces of mastication

    From: Banks P, Brown A. Fractures of the Facial Skeleton,Oxford, Wright 2001 pg.6

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    13/55

    Facial Buttress systemFacial Buttress system

    From :Stanley RB. Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures. In :Bailey BJ

    ed., Head and Neck Surgery-Otolaryngology, third edition,Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2001, pg 777.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    14/55

    Facial Buttress systemFacial Buttress system

    From: Celin SE. Fractures of the Upper Facial and Midfacial Skeleton. In: Myers EN ed.,

    Operative Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company1997:1143-1192.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    15/55

    Facial buttress systemFacial buttress system

    From: Rowe NL, Williams JL. MaxillofacialInjuries. Edinburgh, Churchill

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    16/55

    LeFort fracturesLeFort fractures

    Rene LeFort 1901 in cadaverRene LeFort 1901 in cadaver

    skullsskulls

    Based on the most superior levelBased on the most superior level Frequently different levels onFrequently different levels on

    either sideeither side

    LeFort ILeFort I

    LeFort IILeFort II

    LeFort IIILeFort III

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    17/55

    From: Dolan KD, Jacoby CG, Smoker WR. Radiology of Facial Injury. New York,MacMillian Publishing Company 1988, pg76.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    18/55

    Modified LeFortModified LeFort

    ClassificationClassification

    From: Marciani RD. Management of Midface Fractures: fifty years later.J Oral MaxillofacSurg 1993;51:962.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    19/55

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    20/55

    Donat, Endress,Donat, Endress,

    Mathog classificationMathog classification

    From: Donat TL et al. Facial Fracture Classification According to SkeletalSupport Mechanisms. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:1306-1314.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    21/55

    EvaluationEvaluation

    ABCsABCs

    HistoryHistory

    Palpation of entire facial skeletonPalpation of entire facial skeleton

    OcclusionOcclusion

    Ophthalmologic exam /Ophthalmologic exam /consultationconsultation

    C-spineC-spine

    Imaging CTImaging CT

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    22/55

    ImagingImaging

    CT has surpassed plain film xrayCT has surpassed plain film xray

    Allows precise diagnosis andAllows precise diagnosis and

    surgical planningsurgical planning Axial and coronal cutsAxial and coronal cuts

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    23/55

    From: Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and Neck Imaging;. Fourth Edition; St. Louis, Mosby2003, pg 386.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    24/55

    From: Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and Neck Imaging;. Fourth Edition; St. Louis, Mosby 2003, pg387.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    25/55

    From: Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and Neck Imaging;. Fourth Edition; St. Louis, Mosby2003, pg 393.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    26/55

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    27/55

    Treatment of maxillaryTreatment of maxillary

    fracturesfractures Early repairEarly repair

    Single-stageSingle-stage

    Extended access approachesExtended access approaches

    Rigid fixationRigid fixation

    Immediate bone graftingImmediate bone grafting Re-suspension of soft tissuesRe-suspension of soft tissues

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    28/55

    Maxillary fracturesMaxillary fractures

    Steps of reconstruction-Rohrich andSteps of reconstruction-Rohrich and

    ShewmakeShewmake

    Reestablish facial height and widthReestablish facial height and width IMF with ORIF of mandibleIMF with ORIF of mandible

    Zygomatic arch reconstructionZygomatic arch reconstruction

    restores facial width and projectionrestores facial width and projection

    Reconstruction continues from stableReconstruction continues from stable

    bone to unstable and from lateral tobone to unstable and from lateral to

    medialmedial

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    29/55

    Internal fixation vs.Internal fixation vs.

    traditional methodstraditional methods

    Klotch et al 1987Klotch et al 1987

    43 patients43 patients 22 treated with ORIF using AO22 treated with ORIF using AO

    miniplatesminiplates

    21 treated with combination of21 treated with combination ofintermaxillary fixation, and/orintermaxillary fixation, and/orinterosseous wiring, and/orinterosseous wiring, and/orprimary bone graftingprimary bone grafting

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    30/55

    Most severe injuries in rigidMost severe injuries in rigid

    internal fixation groupinternal fixation group

    Shorter IMF, early return to diet,Shorter IMF, early return to diet,lower percentage of tracheotomylower percentage of tracheotomy

    No plate infectionsNo plate infections

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    31/55

    Haug et al 1995Haug et al 1995

    134 patients treated by134 patients treated by

    maxillomandibular fixation ormaxillomandibular fixation orrigid internal fixationrigid internal fixation

    Postoperative problems in 60% vsPostoperative problems in 60% vs

    64%64%

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    32/55

    Complication rates similarComplication rates similar

    Rigid fixation has benefits:Rigid fixation has benefits:

    Airway protectionAirway protection

    Enhanced nutritionEnhanced nutrition

    More rapid return to pretraumaticMore rapid return to pretraumatic

    functionfunction

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    33/55

    ApproachesApproaches

    CircumvestibularCircumvestibular

    Facial deglovingFacial degloving

    BicoronalBicoronal

    TransconjuctivalTransconjuctival

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    34/55

    From: Haug RH, Buchbinder D. Incisions For Access to CraniomaxillofacialFractures. Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 1993;1(2):23.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    35/55

    From: Haug RH, Buchbinder D. Incisions For Access to CraniomaxillofacialFractures. Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America

    1993;1(2):25.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    36/55

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    37/55

    From: Cheney ML. Facial Surgery: Plastic andReconstructive. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1997.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    38/55

    From: Celin SE. Fractures of the Upper Facial and Midfacial Skeleton. In:

    Myers EN ed., Operative Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company 1997:1143-1192.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    39/55

    T t t fT t t f

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    40/55

    Treatment ofTreatment of

    ZygomaticomaxillaryZygomaticomaxillary

    Complex fracturesComplex fractures

    Restore pre-injury facialRestore pre-injury facial

    configurationconfiguration Prevent cosmetic deformityPrevent cosmetic deformity

    Prevent delayed visualPrevent delayed visual

    disturbancesdisturbances Repair within 5-7 days allowsRepair within 5-7 days allows

    edema to decrease and avoidsedema to decrease and avoids

    shortening of masseter withshortening of masseter with

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    41/55

    Soft diet and malar protectionSoft diet and malar protection

    Closed reductionClosed reduction

    ORIF with plating of one to fourORIF with plating of one to four

    buttressesbuttresses

    Provide fixation as necessary forProvide fixation as necessary for

    stable reductionstable reduction

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    42/55

    Ellis and Kittidumkerng 1996Ellis and Kittidumkerng 1996 48 patients48 patients Reduced fracture with Carroll-GirardReduced fracture with Carroll-Girard

    screwscrew 4.2% closed reductions4.2% closed reductions 31.2 % one point fixation31.2 % one point fixation 27.1% two point fixation27.1% two point fixation

    27.1% three point fixation27.1% three point fixation 10.4% four point fixation10.4% four point fixation Used exposure and fixation needed toUsed exposure and fixation needed to

    provide stable reductionprovide stable reduction

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    43/55

    Approaches to FZApproaches to FZ

    buttressbuttress

    From: Strong EB, Sykes JM. Zygoma Complex Fractures. Facial Plastic Surgery1990;14(1):108.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    44/55

    Approaches to orbitalApproaches to orbital

    floorfloor

    From: Strong EB, Sykes JM. Zygoma Complex Fractures. Facial Plastic Surgery1990;14(1):109.

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    45/55

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    46/55

    Orbital explorationOrbital exploration

    Shumrick et al 1997Shumrick et al 1997

    97 patient with either ZMC or midface97 patient with either ZMC or midface

    fracturesfractures All explored had significant traumaticAll explored had significant traumatic

    disruptions, no enopthalmos ordisruptions, no enopthalmos or

    diplopia in those not exploreddiplopia in those not explored

    Based on their 7 criteria 22 ZMC andBased on their 7 criteria 22 ZMC and

    11 midface underwent orbital11 midface underwent orbital

    explorationexploration

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    47/55

    Persistent diplopia which failed toPersistent diplopia which failed to

    improve in 7 or more days,improve in 7 or more days,

    positive forced duction testing,positive forced duction testing,radiologic evidence ofradiologic evidence of

    perimuscular tissue entrapmentperimuscular tissue entrapment

    Cosmetically significant andCosmetically significant andclinically apparent enophthalmosclinically apparent enophthalmos

    associated with abnormalassociated with abnormal

    radiological findingsradiological findings

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    48/55

    Radiological evidence ofRadiological evidence of

    significant comminution and orsignificant comminution and or

    displacment of the orbital rimdisplacment of the orbital rim Radiological evidence ofRadiological evidence of

    significant displacement orsignificant displacement or

    comminution of greater than 50%comminution of greater than 50%of the orbital floor with herniationof the orbital floor with herniation

    of soft tissue into maxillary sinusof soft tissue into maxillary sinus

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    49/55

    Combined orbital floor and medial wallCombined orbital floor and medial walldefects with soft tissue displacementdefects with soft tissue displacementnoted radiologically on CT scansnoted radiologically on CT scans

    Radiological evidence of a fracture orRadiological evidence of a fracture orcomminution of the body of thecomminution of the body of thezygoma itself as determined by CTzygoma itself as determined by CT

    Physical or radiological evidence ofPhysical or radiological evidence ofexophthalmos or orbital contentexophthalmos or orbital contentimpingement caused by displacedimpingement caused by displacedperiorbital fracturesperiorbital fractures

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    50/55

    Repair of the orbitRepair of the orbit

    ApproachesApproaches

    Transconjunctival with or withoutTransconjunctival with or without

    lateral canthotomy/cantholysislateral canthotomy/cantholysis SubciliarySubciliary

    Transconjunctival has lowerTransconjunctival has lower

    incidence of ectropion/entropionincidence of ectropion/entropion

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    51/55

    Materials forMaterials for

    reconstructionreconstruction

    Autogenous tissuesAutogenous tissues

    Avoid risk of infected implantAvoid risk of infected implant

    Additional operative time, donor siteAdditional operative time, donor sitemorbidity , graft absorptionmorbidity , graft absorption

    Calvarial bone, iliac crest, rib, septalCalvarial bone, iliac crest, rib, septal

    or auricular cartilageor auricular cartilage

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    52/55

    Alloplastic implantsAlloplastic implants

    Decreased operative time, easilyDecreased operative time, easily

    available, no donor site morbidity,available, no donor site morbidity,can provide stable supportcan provide stable support

    Risk of infection 0.4-7%Risk of infection 0.4-7%

    Gelfilm, polygalactin film, silastic,Gelfilm, polygalactin film, silastic,

    marlex mesh, teflon, prolene,marlex mesh, teflon, prolene,

    polyethylene, titaniumpolyethylene, titanium

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    53/55

    Ellis and Tan 2003Ellis and Tan 2003

    58 patients, compared titanium58 patients, compared titanium

    mesh with cranial bone graftmesh with cranial bone graft Used postoperative CT to assessUsed postoperative CT to assess

    adequacy of reconstructionadequacy of reconstruction

    Titanium mesh group subjectivelyTitanium mesh group subjectively

    had more accurate reconstructionhad more accurate reconstruction

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    54/55

    Soft tissueSoft tissue

    resuspensionresuspension

    Wide exposure allows moreWide exposure allows more

    accurate fracture reduction butaccurate fracture reduction but

    may lead to problems in softmay lead to problems in softtissue covering of facetissue covering of face

    Need to close periosteum andNeed to close periosteum and

    provide suspension sutures toprovide suspension sutures toprevent descent of soft tissuesprevent descent of soft tissues

  • 8/14/2019 Fx Max Orb Slides 2004 0107

    55/55

    ConclusionsConclusions

    High index of suspicion forHigh index of suspicion for

    associated injuries- especiallyassociated injuries- especially

    ocularocular Assessment of buttress systemAssessment of buttress system

    Wide exposure via cosmeticallyWide exposure via cosmetically

    acceptable incisionsacceptable incisions Rigid fixationRigid fixation

    Soft tissue resuspensionSoft tissue resuspension