Futures Volume 7 Issue 1 1975 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2875%2990034-8] I.F. Clarke -- 5. Any More for the Time Machine

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Futures Volume 7 Issue 1 1975 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2875%2990034-8] I.F. Clarke -- 5. Any More for the

    1/6

    58

    From

    Prophecy to Prediction

    From

    Prophecy f.

    serialised survey of the movement

    to Prediction

    o Ideas developments in predictive

    fiction and first attempts to forecast

    the future scientifically.

    5. Any more for the time machine?

    I. F. Clarke

    Now that the recent articles on Marx

    and Darwin have brought this series

    to the end of the first year of publica-

    tion it falls to the editor to inaugurate

    a new year with a private prophecy.

    The historians of the future he guesses

    will describe the second half of the 20th

    century as The Age of Reappraisal;

    and the school-children of 2075

    AD

    if

    their great-grandparents have been

    successful will learn from their history

    tapes that ecological pollution the

    growth of population and all the other

    problems of the old days obliged the

    citizens of the late 20th century to

    reconsider the relationship between

    science and society. Today we are

    going through the painful but salutary

    process of saying goodbye to a set of

    assumptions about the advantages of

    uncontrolled technological development

    and the certainty of continuing social

    progress. The historians and social

    analysts of our time-with the sublime

    exception of the Hudson optimists-

    have abandoned the simple faith of

    their predecessors; and now that we

    have most of us grown wiser after the

    experiences of two world wars and of

    world economic depressions it is no

    longer possible to follow the example

    of Neil Arnott Fellow of the Royal

    Society and Physician Extraordinary to

    I. F. Clarke is Chairman of the Department of

    English Studies University of Strathclyde. He

    received the Pilgrim Award for 1974 from the

    Science Fiction Research Association of America

    in recognition of his contributions to their field.

    the Queen who summed up the

    beliefs and expectations of 1861 in his

    book A Survey of Human Progress In the

    style of his time he promised to give

    the reader an account of mankinds

    advance from the savage state to the

    highest civilisation yet attained. A

    progress as little perceived by the

    multitude in any age as is the slow

    growing of a tree by the children who

    play under its shade-but which is

    leading to a new condition of mankind

    on earth.

    That emphatic statement like the

    many histories of progress in the last

    century was the natural and sponta-

    neous revelation of an entirely new

    attitude of mind that separates the

    industrial civilisation of the 19th cen-

    tury from the rest of human history.

    The Arnott Proposition affects us still;

    for we are the inheritors of very original

    and immensely powerful ideas that

    made the 19th century the first great

    epoch of secular prophecy and-in the

    last decades of the century-established

    the base for modern developments in

    social and technological forecasting.

    In a clumsy but convenient phrase

    the technological advances and the

    many intellectual discoveries of the last

    century generated a climate of expecta-

    tion. Behind the evolutionary theories

    of Darwin the political prophecies of

    Marx and the innumerable forecasts of

    the changes yet to come there was a

    dominant sequential explanation for

    the place and purpose of mankind upon

    FUTURES February 975

  • 8/11/2019 Futures Volume 7 Issue 1 1975 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2875%2990034-8] I.F. Clarke -- 5. Any More for the

    2/6

    The detailed study of ancient civilisations, which

    began in the early 18OOs, confirmed the belief in

    progress above).

    Time to come right): the steamship

    Great

    Eastern like the other technological develop-

    ments of the age, was a promise of great

    advances yet to come.

  • 8/11/2019 Futures Volume 7 Issue 1 1975 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2875%2990034-8] I.F. Clarke -- 5. Any More for the

    3/6

    Time to come: the Schneider and Hersaut plan for

    a Channel Bridge in 1889 was an acceptable engi-

    neering project that promised straight-through

    railway links between Glasgow, Paris, Moscow and

    Constantinople.

    Time to come: the vision of the future depended on

    temperament and purpose. For H. G. Wells the hills

    of England would one day carry gigantic wind

    wheels . . .

    for the American author of The

    Last American

    i1893

    the future belonged to the Persians, who

    would reconstruct their own idea of life in Ancient

    Nhu-Yok.

  • 8/11/2019 Futures Volume 7 Issue 1 1975 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2875%2990034-8] I.F. Clarke -- 5. Any More for the

    4/6

    From Prophecy to Prediction 61

    our planet-an explanation that em-

    braced the past present and future of

    the human race. The idea of progress

    is a shorthand way of saying that many

    different factors worked one upon the

    other to promote a distinctly new

    attitude to time and to mans place in

    nature.

    The major factor-constant

    universal evident to all-was the range

    of spectacular developments in tech-

    nology; and an indication of what these

    meant for the Victorians appears in a

    boys book of 1876 Discoveries and

    Inventions of the Twentieth Century. The

    author Robert Routledge passed on

    the wisdom of the elders to the young in

    an enthusiastic account of the marvels

    of science :

    But so much have these things become in

    the present day matters of course that it is

    difficult for one who has not witnessed the

    revolution produced by such applications of

    science to realise their full imnortance. Let

    the young reader who wishes to understand

    why the present epoch is worthy of admira-

    tion as a stage in the progress of mankind

    address himself to some intelligent person

    old enough to remember the century in its

    teens; let him inquire what wonderful

    changes in the aspect of things have been

    comprised within ihe experience of a single

    lifetime and let him ask what has broueht

    about these changes. He will be told of The

    railway and the steamship and the tele-

    graph and the great guns and the mighty

    ships of war.

    As the young learned to perceive the

    chain of cause and effect between

    technological development and social

    improvement the discoveries of the

    geologists and the fossil-hunters worked

    in parallel with the facts of engineering

    enterprise to reinforce and enlarge the

    idea of progress. And here again the

    new knowledge established another

    major difference between the 19th

    century scheme of things and all the

    philosophies of history that had served

    all previous ages. Traditional teaching

    for example had maintained that the

    world was of recent origin; and al-

    though foolish undergraduates still

    laugh on hearing that Archbishop

    Ussher had fixed the date of creation as

    4004 BC they think more respectfully of

    that one-time Chancellor of St Patricks

    Dublin when they discover that

    Malthus wrote in the Essay on Population

    about the five or six thousand years

    that the world has existed. That

    venerable belief in the novity of the

    world vanished in an explosion of

    discoveries and theories which the

    work of Baron Georges Cuvier and Sir

    Charles Lye11 touched off. These two

    remarkable men revealed the immensity

    of the geological past and in doing this

    they taught their contemporaries how

    to become time-travellers. The French-

    man applied his knowledge of com-

    parative anatomy to the study of the

    remote past and he revealed the nature

    and workings of the extraordinary

    creatures then being discovered in the

    Paris rock formations. When Cuvier

    was admitted to the French Academy

    in 1818 the formal address of welcome

    noted the methods by which he made

    the past come to life: You have

    recreated them in a manner of speak-

    ing; and by penetrating to the depths

    in which these bones were buried you

    have travelled back with them through

    the centuries.

    Twelve years afterwards Sir Charles

    Lye11 extended the work of Cuvier by

    his publication of The Principles of

    Geology a book which for once in all

    truth can be called epoch-making.

    Lye11 revealed the unbelievable anti-

    quity of the planet by demonstrating

    the various epochs in the long long

    sequence from the teaming oceans of

    the Cambrian to the arrival of the

    primates in the Pleiocene. As the dis-

    coveries of the palaeontologists changed

    the mental perspective of the Victorians

    the popularisers of science wrote books

    for readers who were eager to make the

    journey through the dark backward of

    geological time. So the amateur

    palaeontologist Thomas Hawkins be-

    gan his Book of the Great Sea Dragons by

    promising a trip to the age of the

    dinosaurs : To wander across the

    desert Continents of Time in search of

    the bleached skeletons

    of extinct

    Nations; to remove from the dust of

    FUTURES February 975

  • 8/11/2019 Futures Volume 7 Issue 1 1975 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2875%2990034-8] I.F. Clarke -- 5. Any More for the

    5/6

    62

    From Pro y to Predicti on

    Oblivion the countless Generations

    which have passed away from the Earth

    for ever. What had caught the

    imagination was the astonishing scale

    of the evolutionary process; and the

    excitement still comes through in a

    publication of 1847

    The Ancient World,

    or ~ i ct~Tes~~e Sketches of Creati on. The

    preface announces the intention of the

    author which is to communicate in a

    simple form to the general reader the

    chief results of Geological Investiga-

    tion. In the first paragraph of his first

    chapter he begins on the scenario

    written into the record of the rocks:

    Long-very long ago-many ages

    before the creation of Man this world

    on which we dwell existed as the habi-

    tation of living beings different from

    those now tenanting its surface or

    inhabiting the ocean which covers so

    large a part of it. Later on as he

    warmed to the task of reconstructing

    the past he caused the dead bones to

    come alive in imaginative descriptions:

    Imagine then one of these monstruous

    animals a P~es~os~~r~ ome sixteen or

    twenty feet long with a small wedge-

    shaped crocodilian head a long arched

    serpent-like neck. . . Imagine for a

    moment this creature slowly emerging

    from the muddy banks and half walk-

    ing half creeping along.

    Thii animated description is one of

    the many indicators that point to a

    change in attitude and outlook that was

    as profound and far-reaching as the

    new way of regarding Europe and the

    planet that followed on the discovery

    of the Americas. The geologists and the

    palaeontoiogists had opened up a new

    world in the far-off past at the same time

    as the achievements of the engineers

    and the scientists revealed the other

    new world that waited for all in the

    future. Out of the discoveries and the

    inventions there emerged a mental

    geography that enabled the Victorians

    to locate themselves and their nations

    in a self-explanatory system. In fact

    the illustrated magazines for the middle

    classes and the ever-growing flood of

    books for the newly literate masses

    show that by the 1860s the evidence of

    universal pro~ess~volutionary and

    technological-had encouraged the

    citizens of the industrial nations to see

    themselves and their societies in a state

    of perpetual motion. The idea of pro-

    gress was a marvellous time-machine;

    it allowed all to see nature and society

    in the act of moving from the less perfect

    to the more perfect.

    The popularisers joined with the pro-

    fessors in prophecies of the future. That

    redoubtable defender of Darwin

    Thomas Henry Huxley drew from the

    evidence of the past the benign lesson

    that thoughtful men once escaped

    from the blinding influences of tradi-

    tional prejudice will find in the lowly

    stock whence man has sprung the best

    evidence of the splendour of his

    capacities; and will discern in his long

    progress through the past a reasonable

    ground of faith in his attainment of a

    nobler future. Across the Atlantic an

    undistinguished Missouri lawyer from

    Platte City wrote with equal assurance

    about an imagined meeting with his

    heat-heat-band-daughter in 1980 :

    The lady explained that, as science

    progressed,

    Man r d uoon sea and in air.

    That storms Gere forbidden- e sea kept

    at rest,

    And seasons made titfid and fair;

    That flowers and animals, far away

    reared,

    Were acclimated here and grew wild;

    And a motor, much stronger than steam,

    had appeared,

    Yet cheap, economic and mild.

    The dominant ideology of any age

    shows itself most clearly in the instruc-

    tion of the young; and the workings of

    the universal consensus on the idea of

    progress can be examined in two books

    for juveniles of 1865. In Lhomme de@

    cinq m s uns there is the standard

    linking of past present and future. The

    author gives a dramatic and episodic

    account of the main stages in the evolu-

    tion of human life beginning with the

    first inhabitants of Paris and with

    illustrations of mastodons roaming what

    was later the Montmartre area; and he

    FUTURES February 875

  • 8/11/2019 Futures Volume 7 Issue 1 1975 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2875%2990034-8] I.F. Clarke -- 5. Any More for the

    6/6

    From Pro@ec~ to Prediction 63

    closes with a chapter on the inventions

    of the year 2865. Across the Channel,

    for which the engineers had already

    designed a tunnel, the author of

    A

    piston of wonde~f l naction

    transmitted

    the sacred doctrines of the race: there

    is no limit to the grand dominion

    man may in the end obtain.

    And yet, despite the universal famili-

    arity with the idea of the future, there

    was remarkably little technological or

    social forecasting before the end of the

    century. At first sight it seems surprising

    that during the period of accelerated

    development between 1870 and 1900-

    so many changes in warfare, armaments,

    and technology-the Europeans and

    the Americans were weII pleased with

    fictional accounts---utopias, dystopias,

    imaginary wars-that presented the

    most likely pattern of future develop-

    ments. There were reasons for this.

    First, the major engineering enterprises

    of the day came to the public in docu-

    ments that were in effect technological

    forecasts. Proposals for canals across

    the Isthmus of Panama for steam com-

    munication with India, and for the

    improved navigation of Indian rivers

    -like De Lesseps draft calculations for

    the Suez Canal and Hector Horeaus

    projection of a submarine railway

    between France and England-all of

    these contained estimates and forecasts

    of the material and financial advantages

    that would follow on construction.

    Second, and much more important, the

    general assumption that the march of

    progress would go forward in the

    known way, that the future would be

    an improved model of 19th century

    capitalistic and colonial society, sepa-

    rated science from the social conse-

    quences of technological development

    in the thinking of most people before

    the 20th century. For example, Pierre

    Dronier in 1894 outlined his scheme for

    a transatlantic air line in

    La navigation

    aerienne

    and calculated that with his

    new machines he could operate four

    flights a month between New York and

    Paris, carrying 100 passengers on every

    Aight at a charge of 300 francs, But not

    a word in all his arguments about the

    changes that might follow on such a

    development. In like manner another

    forecast, Tw~~~ Cetitwy

    ~~~~tions,

    published by George Sutherland in

    1901, separated future developments

    from their social consequences. He was

    convinced that the submarine would

    have a very limited part in warfare,

    since it is hopeless to expect the eyes of

    the sailor to see any great distance

    under water. It would be the same in

    the air:

    Military aeronautics, ike submarine opera-

    tions in naval warfare, have been somewhat

    overrated. Visions of air-shipshovering over

    a doomed city and devastating it with

    miss dropped from above

    are

    mere fairy

    tales. Indeed, the whole subject of aero-

    nautics as an element in future human

    progress has excited far more attention than

    its intrinsic merits deserve.

    These first essays in forecasting assumed

    that, although there would be major

    innovations in the future, the societies

    that experienced these changes would

    continue along the long established

    lines of national history. Indeed, their

    silliest but most sacred national songs

    celebrated the fortunate union of the

    nation with the idea of progress. The

    many millions in the UK who sang with

    such innocent gusto about the pre-

    destined advance of the nation-

    wider stiII and wider may thy bounds

    be set-like their German counter-

    parts hymning their nation-Deutsch-

    land iiber alles-were the unknowing

    victims of the 19th century myth: the

    conviction that in an epoch of un-

    precedented technological invention it

    was still possible to pursue old-style

    chauvinist interests without the risk of

    catastrophe. The trap which the idea of

    progress had set for them was that

    their idea of the future was no more

    than a projection of their past. They

    had not read Edmund Burke who

    wrote to a Member of the National

    Assembly: You can never plan the

    future from the past.

    FUTURES February S7