6
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Future Prospects of Low Compression Ignition Engines M. A. Azim Received: 29 June 2012 / Accepted: 24 February 2014 / Published online: 14 March 2014 Ó The Institution of Engineers (India) 2014 Abstract This study presents a review and analysis of the effects of compression ratio and inlet air preheating on engine performance in order to assess the future prospects of low compression ignition engines. Regulation of the inlet air preheating allows some control over the combus- tion process in compression ignition engines. Literature shows that low compression ratio and inlet air preheating are more beneficial to internal combustion engines than detrimental. Even the disadvantages due to low compres- sion ratio are outweighed by the advantages due to inlet air preheating and vice versa. Keywords Low compression ignition Inlet air preheating Exhaust gas recirculation Mixture homogeneity Emission Efficiency Introduction One of the most critical challenges for the future internal combustion (IC) engine is to meet the near zero emission with high cycle efficiency, which can be achieved through homogeneous combustion. In this mode of combustion, fuel mixture undergoes simultaneous heat release in the whole combustion chamber characterized by homogeneous tem- perature field [1]. Combustion in direct injection compres- sion ignition (DICI) engines are unavoidably heterogeneous because fuel is injected into combustion air only a few mil- liseconds before the combustion is initiated, making homo- geneity at the level relevant to chemical kinetics impossible. So to obtain a desired level of homogeneity of fuel–air mixture, decoupling of combustion from injection process is a necessity for compression ignition engines that introduces different approaches to fuel mixture formulation [2]. Com- bustion emissions from IC engines are mostly NOx, CO, HC (hydrocarbon), soot and smoke. High peak temperature in combustion process governs the kinetics of NOx formation while completeness of combustion governs the kinetics of CO and HC formation. Soot forms in the fuel-rich zones of the combustion chamber and its formation is influenced by the mixing process rather than chemical kinetics, and smoke mainly in the form of carbon are caused by the production of soot. Complete microscale homogeneity of fuel, air and residual gas mixture produces as much as 1000-fold reduc- tion in NOx, which is close to the theoretical predictions by chemical kinetics [3]. On the other hand, study on stratified charge compression ignition engine [4] reveals that for a fixed overall equivalence ratio / (fuel–air ratio to stoichi- ometric fuel–air ratio), increasing homogeneity of fuel mixture causes NOx emission to decrease to minimum and then to increase and CO emission to increase to maximum and then to decrease. However, emissions are known to depend on the optimal combustion phasing and equivalence ratio, while engine speed, load, exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), compression ratio (CR), inlet air temperature and fuel octane number influence the combustion phasing. Homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) and premixed charge compression ignition (PCCI) are the two potential approaches for mixture formation. HCCI relies on early injection to achieve homogeneous air–fuel mixture. Combustion is not directly controlled but begins to take place whenever the appropriate conditions are reached. In HCCI combustion, short duration of combustion and high rate of heat release cause high rise in pressure and temperature, which is detrimental to engine operation and life. While M. A. Azim (&) Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh e-mail: [email protected] 123 J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C (January–March 2014) 95(1):25–30 DOI 10.1007/s40032-014-0103-7

Future Prospects of Low Compression Ignition Engines

  • Upload
    m-a

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Future Prospects of Low Compression Ignition Engines

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Future Prospects of Low Compression Ignition Engines

M. A. Azim

Received: 29 June 2012 / Accepted: 24 February 2014 / Published online: 14 March 2014

� The Institution of Engineers (India) 2014

Abstract This study presents a review and analysis of the

effects of compression ratio and inlet air preheating on

engine performance in order to assess the future prospects

of low compression ignition engines. Regulation of the

inlet air preheating allows some control over the combus-

tion process in compression ignition engines. Literature

shows that low compression ratio and inlet air preheating

are more beneficial to internal combustion engines than

detrimental. Even the disadvantages due to low compres-

sion ratio are outweighed by the advantages due to inlet air

preheating and vice versa.

Keywords Low compression ignition �Inlet air preheating � Exhaust gas recirculation �Mixture homogeneity � Emission � Efficiency

Introduction

One of the most critical challenges for the future internal

combustion (IC) engine is to meet the near zero emission

with high cycle efficiency, which can be achieved through

homogeneous combustion. In this mode of combustion, fuel

mixture undergoes simultaneous heat release in the whole

combustion chamber characterized by homogeneous tem-

perature field [1]. Combustion in direct injection compres-

sion ignition (DICI) engines are unavoidably heterogeneous

because fuel is injected into combustion air only a few mil-

liseconds before the combustion is initiated, making homo-

geneity at the level relevant to chemical kinetics impossible.

So to obtain a desired level of homogeneity of fuel–air

mixture, decoupling of combustion from injection process is

a necessity for compression ignition engines that introduces

different approaches to fuel mixture formulation [2]. Com-

bustion emissions from IC engines are mostly NOx, CO, HC

(hydrocarbon), soot and smoke. High peak temperature in

combustion process governs the kinetics of NOx formation

while completeness of combustion governs the kinetics of

CO and HC formation. Soot forms in the fuel-rich zones of

the combustion chamber and its formation is influenced by

the mixing process rather than chemical kinetics, and smoke

mainly in the form of carbon are caused by the production of

soot. Complete microscale homogeneity of fuel, air and

residual gas mixture produces as much as 1000-fold reduc-

tion in NOx, which is close to the theoretical predictions by

chemical kinetics [3]. On the other hand, study on stratified

charge compression ignition engine [4] reveals that for a

fixed overall equivalence ratio / (fuel–air ratio to stoichi-

ometric fuel–air ratio), increasing homogeneity of fuel

mixture causes NOx emission to decrease to minimum and

then to increase and CO emission to increase to maximum

and then to decrease. However, emissions are known to

depend on the optimal combustion phasing and equivalence

ratio, while engine speed, load, exhaust gas recirculation

(EGR), compression ratio (CR), inlet air temperature and

fuel octane number influence the combustion phasing.

Homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) and

premixed charge compression ignition (PCCI) are the two

potential approaches for mixture formation. HCCI relies on

early injection to achieve homogeneous air–fuel mixture.

Combustion is not directly controlled but begins to take place

whenever the appropriate conditions are reached. In HCCI

combustion, short duration of combustion and high rate of

heat release cause high rise in pressure and temperature,

which is detrimental to engine operation and life. While

M. A. Azim (&)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bangladesh University

of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh

e-mail: [email protected]

123

J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C (January–March 2014) 95(1):25–30

DOI 10.1007/s40032-014-0103-7

Page 2: Future Prospects of Low Compression Ignition Engines

PCCI relies on late injection to allow a certain degree of

stratification, it helps to restore control over the combustion

process partly. Air–fuel mixture is not completely homoge-

neous in PCCI as in HCCI, although combustion in both is

dominated by chemical kinetics instead of air–fuel mixing

[5]. The strategy in PCCI combines the efficiency of a diesel

engine and the low particulate emission of a gasoline engine.

In PCCI, combustion is slowed down because the mixture

does not ignite everywhere at once, especially in two-stage

injection. The lower rate of heat release in two-stage injec-

tion extends the operating range from low load to medium or

even full load. Its long duration of combustion and low rate of

heat release cause low rise in pressure and temperature which

is favourable to engine operation and life. For these reasons,

PCCI is the most promising combustion strategy for future

IC engines. It is noteworthy that recent research claims the

promising potential of HCCI approach for mixture formation

with stratified EGR. Test results for HCCI combustion with

EGR stratification show the decreased level of heat release

rate (HRR) as well as the decreased level of combustion

noise. This is because of delayed and slowed combustion

compared to homogeneous case due to the observed large-

scale stratification in the combustion chamber near the top

dead center (TDC) [6].

Combustion occurs in many different modes namely low

temperature combustion (LTC), high temperature com-

bustion (HTC) and diffusion combustion that influence the

engine emissions. Comparison of HCCI, PCCI (single

injection) and DICI combustion is shown in Fig. 1 against

crank angle (CA) for the same / [4, 7], hereafter zero

degree CA corresponds to piston position at TDC in com-

pression stroke. However, the nature of combustion is

greatly influenced by the EGR that controls the combustion

due to the reduction in oxygen concentration, presence of

combustion products and reduction in temperature rise

caused by the heat sink effect.

This study is intended to review and analyze the effects

of CR and inlet air preheating on engine performance

together with EGR in order to assess the future prospects of

low compression ignition engines.

Effects of Compression Ratio

It is generally expected that decrease in CR causes reduction in

gas pressure and temperature resulting in reduced rate of

combustion. Higher injection pressure in IC engine shows

more rapid combustion, and narrower and high peak heat

release patterns, while lower injection pressure that is asso-

ciated with low compression ignition results in broader and

low peak heat release patterns [7]. In other words, decrease in

CR causes reduction in charge density that reduces reactant

concentration and causes decrease in reaction kinetics. Thus

reduction in CR may be accompanied by LTC, which in

general causes increase in CO and HC emissions and decrease

in NOx emission. However, Christensen et al. [8] demon-

strated that efficiency of combustion in HCCI improves

almost linearly with reduced CR for any liquid fuel. Some

researchers e.g. Alkidas [9] and Damrongkijkosol [10]

showed combustion chamber crevices as source of HC

emission. This HC emission is found to reduce at lower CR as

less unburned fuel mixture is forced into the crevices during

compression and combustion, and emerges late in the

expansion and exhaust strokes. Some literature shows that CO

emission may be minimized by combustion with excess air,

rapid air–fuel mixing and long residence time at high tem-

perature. Kinetics of CO formation is not clearly understood

though it is mentioned earlier that completeness of combus-

tion governs its formation. Further, high CR accompanies

HTC where CO may originate by the dissociation of CO2 to

CO [11, 12]. It is possible that dissociation of CO2 to CO

occurs in the HTC zone to favor a lower Gibbs free energy

caused by the endothermic dissociation.

Goebel and Dutton [13] showed that transverse turbulence

intensity decreases with increasing compressibility, while

the streamwise turbulence intensity remains approximately

constant. In-cylinder velocity measurements show that at

high CR, turbulence intensity becomes less homogeneous

but its average intensity remains unaffected [5]. As turbu-

lence intensity affects the mechanism of mixing, it is

apparent that mixing of air–fuel through turbulence is not

affected by lower CR, rather may have some more mixing

due to increase in transverse turbulence intensity.

The test results of a DICI diesel engine by Kajitani [14]

show that reduction in CR causes decrease in minimum

brake specific fuel consumption, brake thermal efficiency

and NOx emission, and increase in HRR, exhaust gas

temperature and emission of CO and THC (total hydro-

carbon). The observed increase in HRR for the reduced CR

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

0

60

120

180

240HTC

LTC

Diffusion combustion

DICI

PCCI

HCCI

HR

R (

J/ o C

A)

Crank angle ( oCA)

Fig. 1 Different modes of compression ignition combustion for /= 0.31.Continuous line HCCI, dashed line PCCI, dashed-dotted line

DICI. Data are from Lu et al. [4] and Sung et al. [7]

26 J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C (January–March 2014) 95(1):25–30

123

Page 3: Future Prospects of Low Compression Ignition Engines

may be due to moderate diffusion combustion after some

initial pre-mixture combustion. Effects of CR on the brake

thermal efficiency and NOx emission are shown in Fig. 2

where both are seen to decrease with the reduced CR.

Figure 3 shows that emissions of both CO and THC

increase with reduced CR, where the word ratio means a

value relative to the one at CR equals 17.7. So in DICI

diesel engine, reduction in CR is not beneficial to its per-

formance except reduction in NOx.

The test report of a HCCI dimethyl ether engine from

Hu et al. [15] demonstrates the decrease in peak pressure

and temperature in the first stage combustion, and increase

in brake thermal efficiency at low power level and increase

in CO and HC emissions with the reduction in CR, the HC

here referred to THC. Figures 4 and 5 show the increase of

brake thermal efficiency and CO emission with reduced

CR. It appears from Fig. 6 that change in CR has no

influence on NOx emission except at higher brake mean

effective pressure (BMEP). Figure 7 shows the effect of

CR on HC emission which is different from CO emission.

Low CR causes LTC that offers higher emission of HC. On

the other, combustion at low CR forces less unburned HC

into the crevices. HC emission from these two sources are

manifested such that THC emission is lower at CR = 8.0

than at CR = 10.7. This HCCI dimethyl ether engine

shows some benefits in terms of performance at low CR,

e.g. increase in brake thermal efficiency due to improved

combustion efficiency.

Beatrice et al. [16] carried out an exhaustive investiga-

tion on the effect of CR on the performance of a light duty

diesel engine. Their results show no significant gain in

PCCI application except drastic reduction in smoke emis-

sion. However, the test data of a PCCI diesel engine after

Laguitton et al. [17] show that reduction in CR causes

decrease in NOx and smoke emissions, and no significant

effect on fuel consumption. Figure 8 shows that fuel con-

sumption rate increases slowly with increasing CA at lower

CR. Effects of compression ratio on NOx and smoke

emissions are shown in Figs. 9 and 10 where the emissions

reduce with increasing CA at lower CR.

12 14 16 180.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

Thermal eff. NO

x

Rat

ios

of th

erm

al e

ff. ,

NO

x

CR

Fig. 2 Effect of compression ratio on brake thermal efficiency and

emission. Data are from Kajitani [14]

12 14 16 180

2

4

6

8

10 CO THC

Rat

ios

of C

O, T

HC

CR

Fig. 3 Effect of compression ratio on engine emissions. Data are

from Kajitani [14]

0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.3510

15

20

25

30

35

CR=8.0 CR=10.7 CR=14.0

Bra

ke th

erm

al e

ff. (

%)

BMEP (MPa)

Fig. 4 Brake thermal efficiency under different CR. Data are from

Hu et al. [15]

0.1 0.2 0.30.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

CR=8.0 CR=10.7 CR=14.0

CO

(%

)

BMEP (MPa)

Fig. 5 Carbon monoxide emission under different CR. Data are from

Hu et al. [15]

J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C (January–March 2014) 95(1):25–30 27

123

Page 4: Future Prospects of Low Compression Ignition Engines

High injection pressure is found beneficial for better air-

fuel mixing and improved combustion in high compression

ignition. While low compression ignition requires low

injection pressure where it is desirable for cost effective

fuel injection system and for reduction in fuel pump

parasitics. Ignition in IC engines may be achieved at low

CR by increasing inlet air temperature using exhaust gas.

Regulation of inlet air temperature for achieving ignition

temperature by compression is described in the next sec-

tion. Increase in inlet air temperature causes reduction in

engine output, while decrease in operating pressure in low

compression engine causes reduction in its required weight,

e.g. some test results of diesel powered DICI engine show

that decrease in CR from 18 to 17.5 causes reduction in

weight/power ratio from 0.39 to 0.36 kg/kWh without

deterioration of performance. So low compression ignition

accompanied by inlet air preheating does not affect the use

of low compression ignition engine in land or space vehi-

cles considering weight/power ratio.

An overall assessment of the literature shows that lower

compression ratio is more beneficial to engines with regard

to its operation, life, combustion emissions and efficiency.

Now it appears that, to get some more control over the

combustion process, to reduce combustion emissions, and

to increase cycle efficiency in an IC engine, low com-

pression ignition is a promising avenue.

Effects of Inlet Air Preheating

Preheating of inlet air is known to induce faster vaporiza-

tion of fuel, better mixing of air–fuel and shorter ignition

delay in IC engines that result in less fuel adhering to in-

cylinder wall wetting. Less wall wetting reduces emission

of soot and THC, and better air–fuel mixing reduces

emission of CO. On the contrary, inlet air preheating is

detrimental to engine output. However, low operating

-2 0 2 4 61.8

1.9

2.0 CR=16.0 CR=18.4

Fue

l con

sum

ptio

n (k

g/h)

Crank angle ( oCA)

Fig. 8 Effect of compression ratio on fuel consumption. Data are

from Laguitton et al. [17]

0.1 0.2 0.30

200

400

600 CR=8.0 CR=10.7 CR=14.0

NO

x (%

)

BMEP (MPa)

Fig. 6 Nitrogen oxide emission under different CR. Data are from Hu

et al. [15]

0.1 0.2 0.3200

400

600

800

1000 CR=8.0 CR=10.7 CR=14.0

HC

(pp

m)

BMEP (MPa)

Fig. 7 Hydrocarbon emission under different CR. Data are from Hu

et al. [15]

-2 0 2 4 6

7

8

9

10

11 CR=16.0 CR=18.4

NO

x (g/

h)

Crank angle ( oCA)

Fig. 9 Effect of compression ratio on nitrogen oxide emission. Data

are from Laguitton et al. [17]

28 J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C (January–March 2014) 95(1):25–30

123

Page 5: Future Prospects of Low Compression Ignition Engines

pressure in low compression ignition engine compensates

the reduction in engine output as already mentioned.

Increase in inlet air temperature, in general, reduces

engine emissions and fuel consumption that are beneficial

to engines. Effects of inlet air temperature on the emissions

of NOx, CO and THC, and brake thermal efficiency without

EGR are shown in Figs. 11 and 12 from Kusaka et al. [18].

It appears in the figures that increase in inlet air tempera-

ture reduces CO and THC emissions, and increases brake

thermal efficiency and NOx emission.

Control of inlet air temperature is made by heating the

air with engine exhaust in a heat exchanger. Investigation

shows significantly different effects of hot and cold EGR

on engine performance. However, this effect of EGR

temperature diminishes as its percentage increases in the

oxidizer (mixture of inlet air and EGR) [19]. On the other

hand, literature shows that effect of inlet air preheating

together with EGR provides better result on engine per-

formance than their individual effect [18, 20]. Oxidizer

temperature To is the initial temperature of the compression

process in an IC engine which can be calculated from heat

balance for the mixture of preheated inlet air and EGR as

xCpe þ 1� xð ÞCpa

� �To ¼ xCpeTe þ 1� xð ÞCpaTpa ð1Þ

where Cpe and Cpa are specific heats for the exhaust gas and

preheated air, Te and Tpa are temperatures of exhaust gas

and preheated air, and x is the percentage of EGR in the

oxidizer. If the temperature at the end of compression is the

ignition temperature Tig then assuming isentropic

compression

To ¼ TigCR1�co : ð2Þ

Substituting Eq. (2) in Eq. (1), preheated air temperature

may be expressed as

Tpa ¼ ATigCR1�co � xCpeTe

� �= 1� xð ÞCpa ð3Þ

where A ¼ xCpe þ 1� xð ÞCpa and co equals specific heat

ratio of the oxidizer. A typical temperature of the preheated

air is calculated using Eq. (3) and found to be Tpa = 49 �C

for the given Tig = 700 �C, Te = 400 �C, CR = 10,

x = 0.2, Cpa = 1.005 kJ/kgK, Cpe = 1.15 kJ/kgK and

co ¼ xce þ 1� xð Þcpa ð4Þ

where the specific heat ratios of exhaust gas ce = 1.33 and

preheated air cpa = 1.4. The calculated preheat tempera-

ture 49 �C is quite small to produce knock compared to a

safe intake temperature of 180 �C with 50 % EGR at 40 %

load [18]. Further, Maurya and Agarwal [21] reported a

stable operating range in HCCI combustion in terms of /and inlet air temperature varying from 110–160 �C for

gasoline and 120–150 �C for methanol. Equation (3) can be

used to adjust preheat temperature and CR for achieving

auto-ignition for a variety of fuels. Christensen et al. [8]

have studied the relation between the inlet air temperature

and the CR needed to get auto-ignition for fuels with dif-

ferent octane numbers, e.g. auto-ignition of a fuel (80 %

0 40 80 1204

6

8

10

12

14 NO

x

NO

x (g/

kWh)

Inlet temperature ( oC)

10

15

20

25

30

COC

O (

g/kW

h)

Fig. 11 Effect of inlet temperature on exhaust emissions. Data are

from Kusaka et al. [18]

0 40 80 12015

30

45

60

75

TH C

TH

C (

g/kW

h)

Inlet temperature ( oC)

20

25

30

35

40

The

rmal

eff

(%

)

E ff

Fig. 12 Effect of inlet temperature on emission and thermal

efficiency. Data are from Kusaka et al. [18]

-2 0 2 4 610

15

20

25

30

C R= 16.0 C R= 18.4

Smok

e (m

g/m

3 )

Crank angle ( oCA)

Fig. 10 Effect of compression ratio on smoke emission. Data are

from Laguitton et al. [17]

J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C (January–March 2014) 95(1):25–30 29

123

Page 6: Future Prospects of Low Compression Ignition Engines

diesel and 20 % gasoline) at TDC requires CR = 10 for an

inlet air temperature of 90 �C while that requires CR = 14

for an inlet air temperature of 30 �C.

Conclusions

The prospects of low compression ignition engines are

reviewed and analyzed in this paper. Such engine requires

inlet air preheating for achieving the ignition temperature

and proves to be potential to meet stringent emission regu-

lations and high cycle efficiency of the future IC engine. The

effects of low CR and inlet air preheating together with EGR

on IC engine performance are summarized as follows:

(1) Change in CR does not affect average intensity of

turbulence, thus mixing of air–fuel and efficiency of

combustion are not affected by the reduction in CR.

While reduction in CR causes increase in brake

thermal efficiency in HCCI combustion.

(2) Low compression ignition offers low peak tempera-

ture and pressure that cause reduced emissions of

NOx and THC. Moreover, low operating pressure is

useful for lighter engines and reduction in fuel pump

parasitics.

(3) Inlet air preheating reduces emission of CO and THC

and consumption of fuel, and increases thermal

efficiency with reduced engine output. This reduction

in output may be compensated in low compression

ignition engine by reduction in its required weight

due to low operating pressure.

(4) Inlet air preheating allows some more control over the

combustion process in compression ignition engine

and thus control over start of ignition.

(5) Varieties of fuels with wide range of ignition

temperatures may be found suitable for low com-

pression ignition by adjusting preheat temperature of

the inlet air.

References

1. M. Weclas, Academic Press, University of Applied Sciences,

Nuernberg, 2004

2. M. Weclas, R. Faltermeier, Int. J. Engine Res. IMechE 8, 399

(2007)

3. M.R. Showalter, US Patent 4609342, Automotive engine asso-

ciates, Wisconsin, 1986

4. X.C. Lu, L.B. Ji, J.J. Ma, C. Huang, Z. Huang, in Proceedings of

the IMechE, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 222,

2457 (2008)

5. R.P.C. Zegers, C.C.M. Luijten, N.J. Dam, L.P.H. de Goey, in

Proceedings of 4th European Combustion Meeting, Vienna,

(2009)

6. M. Andre, B. Walter, G. Bruneaux, F. Foucher, C.M. Rousselle,

Int. J. Engine Res. 13(5), 429 (2012)

7. Y. Sung, G. Jung, M.T. Lim, J. Mech. Sci. Tech. 25(6), 1409

(2011)

8. M. Christensen, A. Hultqvist, B. Johansson, SAE Trans. 108(3),

2099 (1999)

9. A.C. Alkidas, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 25(3), 253 (1999)

10. C. Damrongkijkosol, M. Sc. Thesis, King Mongkut’s Institute of

Technology, North Bangkok, Bang Sue, (2006)

11. W.A. Chishty, M. Klein, Institute of Aerospace Research, Canada

(2009)

12. K. Wark, C.F. Warner, W.T. Davis, Air Pollution, Its Origin and

Control, (Addison Wesley Longman Inc, Boston, 1998)

13. S.G. Goebel, J.C. Dutton, AIAA 28th Aerospace Science.

Meeting, (1990), p. 709

14. S. Kajitani, Thermal Engineering Division. JSME, TED News-

letter 42, 1 (2004)

15. T. Hu, S. Liu, L. Zhou, W. Li, in Proceedings of IMechE Part D:

Journal of Automobile Engineering 220, 637 (2006)

16. C. Beatrice, N.D. Giacomo, C. Guido, SAE Int. J. 2(1), 1290

(2009)

17. O. Laguitton, C. Crua, T. Cowell, M.R. Heikal, M.R. Gold, in

ECOS Greece 19th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost,

Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy

Systems, (2006)

18. J. Kusaka, Y. Daisho, R. Kihara, T. Saito, in Proceedings of

Fourth International Symposium, Comodia, 1998

19. M.Y.E. Selim, Energy Convers. Manag. 44, 707 (2003)

20. M.M.Z. Shahadat, M.N. Nabi, M.S. Akhter, M.S.H.K. Tushar,

Int. Energy J. 9(2), 109 (2008)

21. R.K. Maurya, A.K. Agarwal, in Proceedings of IMechE Part D:

Journal of Automobile Engineering 223(11), 1445 (2009)

30 J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C (January–March 2014) 95(1):25–30

123