47
Future of Healthcare By Natalie Sterner, Dan Wandsnider, Jack Travis, and Reed Wuttke

Future of Healthcare By Natalie Sterner, Dan Wandsnider, Jack Travis, and Reed Wuttke

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Future of Healthcare

By Natalie Sterner, Dan Wandsnider, Jack Travis, and Reed Wuttke

Agenda

● Healthcare Costso Obesityo Medical Technology

● Affordable Care Act & Healthcare Reformo Private Insuranceo Medicareo Medicaid

Obesity: The American Epidemic● 66.3% of Americans are overweight or obese (Anderson et al.

2007)

o BMI > 25 kg/m2

o Highest obesity rate of surveyed OECD countries● Obesity in last 50 yrs & more than doubled in last 30

yrs (Cawley et al. 2012, Burkhauser et al. 2009)

● More than ⅓ of children & adolescents overweight or obeseo Obese adolescents aged 12-19 5%-21% from 1980-

2012 (Center for Disease Control and Prevention)

Obesity Trends Among Adults

● Adults aged 20-74 years in US(Ogden et al. 2010)

● 2013: 35.5% adults aged 18 yrs & older overweight; 28.3% obese (Center for Disease Control and Prevention)

Obesity Health Consequences

● Obesity assoc. w/ Myocardial infarction, Stroke, Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes, Cancer, Osteoarthritis, Asthma, and Depression (Cawley et al. 2012)

● Type 2 Diabetes progressively deteriorates multiple organs and systems leading to blindness, limb amputations, renal failure, coronary artery disease (Dixon 2010)

o Majority of medical costs for obesity due to Type 2 Diabetes

● Resulting in more than 300,000 annual deaths (Dixon 2010)

Costs of Obesity

● Per capita medical spending for obese people $1,429 in 2006o 42% larger than spending for normal weight people

(Finkelstein et al. 2009)

● In 2008, est. $147b of medical costs from obesityo Increase from $78.5b in 1998 (Finkelstein et al. 2009)

● Obesity prevalence accounts for 12% of growth in

healthcare spending (Thorpe et al. 2004)

● The Future: no signs of slowing down

Medical Technology: Diagnostic

● U.S. has ~3x as many CTs, MRIs, and mammographs/mil pop as OECD countries average in 2009o >2x MRI exams given/mil pop.; Fees highest: $1,080o >2x CT exams given/mil pop.; Fees highest: $510

(Squires 2012)

Medical Technology: Procedures

● Volume of Knee & Hip Replacements

2009 (Squires 2012)

Medical Technology: Procedures

Rate per 100,000 pop of Coronary Revascularization Procedures in 2003 (Peterson 2007)

● U.S. more than double OECD average

Medical Technology: Surgeries

Changes in the Surgical Treatment of Heart Attacks, 1984-1998● In 1984, 10% of

patients had surgical intervention.

● By 1998, >50% received catheterization (Cutler 2001)

Medical Technology Costs

● $18,000/discharge compared to less than $10,000 in Sweden, Australia, New Zealand, France, & Germanyo U.S. more resource intensive & prices higher (Squires 2012)

● Moral Hazard: w/ generous insurance, patients & physicians overuse treatments regardless of effectivenesso Type 2 Diabetes: less coverage, more incentives to

exercise and diet● New MT costs & estimated to account for more than ½

of LT spending growth (Smith 2009)

Medical Technology Costs

Private Insurance

● Costs of medical care ● Costs of health insurance● Affordable Care Act

o Large Employer Marketo Individual/Small Group Market

Increased Healthcare Spending

● 1980: $215 B 1998: $1.02 T 2003: $1.7 To 15% of 2003 GDP (Smith et al., 2005)

● 1998: $4,178 per capita (Anderson and Hussey, 2001)

● Most expensive 5% ~50% health spendingo Bottom 50% 3% (Zuvekas and Cohen, 2007)

Increased Insurance Spending

● 1954 IRS ruling - insurance through employers not taxed

● Consumer out of pocket spendingo 1960: 48%o 2000: 15%

(Igelhart, 2002) (Schieber, 2004)

Rising Cost of Health Insurance

(U.S. Department of Labor and the Employee Benefit Research Institute, 2012)

Rising Costs, 1999-2012

Large Employer Market

● Market already functioning acceptably well● Large employers must provide “minimum

coverage”● ACA made few reforms

o Eliminate coverage limitso Cover preventative serviceso Cover dependentso Nondiscrimination on basis of preexisting conditions

Who is Covered?

● 2004: 62.4% of non-elderly population covered through employers (Fronstin, 2005)

● 2000: 69% employers offered coverageo 2005: 60% 5 million uninsured (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2005)

(Collins, Davis, and Ho, 2005)

● 40% firms with < 10 employees provided insurance (Blumenthal, 2006)

Who isn’t Covered?

● ⅔ uninsured have incomes ≤ 200% of FPL (The Urban

Institute and the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, 2008)

● Average employer premium (Blumberg and Holahan, 2009)

o Individual: $4,800 22%o Family: $13,300 30%

Individual/Small-Group Market

● Key provisionso Expanded coverage

Cannot discriminate based on pre-existing conditions

o Mandateo Subsidies

Change in Definition of Fair Share

● Actuarial fairness ability to payo Actuarial fairness is discriminatory

● Experience rated community rated

Community-Rated Insurance

(Bradford and Max, 1997)

Challenges Faced by ACA

● Asymmetric information problem (Rothschild-Stiglitz - 1976)

o Adverse selection

● Noncompliance● Four ways to combat

o Minimum coverage requirementso Exchange certification requiremento Medical-loss ratio requirementso Risk adjustments

Medicare Overview

● Rising Costs○ Demographics

● Changes Under the ACA○ Financial ○ Cost Effectiveness○ Coverage

Medicare- Rising Costs● Increasing Medicare Costs

o Aging populaceo Life expectancy increase

Medicare-Rising Costs

● Increasing Medicare Costs Part A trust fund through 2017 (Kaplan 2011)

Medicare: ACA Overview

● Financial Changes● Part A and B Cost Saving measures

o Evidence/Efficiency Incentiveso Accountable Care Organizations

● Changes in coverageo Part A, B, C, and D

ACA: Financial Changes

● MA plan reduction● $196.3 b cut to providers over 10 years (Davis 2010)

● Increased taxes generates $400 b by 2019 (White 2010)

o Families over $250,000 o Medical Deviceso Insurers

● Medicare costs 2016 projected $20 b (Auerbach 2014)

● Part A trust fund through 2029 (Kaplan 2011)

Part A and B: Evidence/Efficiency ● Coverage with evidence development (CED)

o 46% of trials contradict practices (Prasad 2012)

o Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) $3 b through 2019 (Krumholz & Selby 2012)

Utilize Electronic health records (EHR)● $2 b savings and stopped 200 premature deaths (Mohr & Tunis 2010)

● EHR copying (Ryan & Mushlin 2014)

● Value-based purchasing (VBP) and Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) Incentives

VBP pool 3% fine in HRRP

● 2012: ⅔ of hospitals (Gilman et al. 2014)

Part A and B: ACO

● Accountable Care Organizationso Provider Groupso Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)

Rewards/Penalizes 4 million enrolled (Gold 2014)

May overstate savings (Douven et al. 2015)

Part A and B: Coverage Changes

● Covered annual preventative care visito 27.5% versus 1.4% (Chung et al. 2015)

Part A and B: Coverage Changes

● Mental health coverage expansiono Preventive Care Screenings o 2008 Medicare Improvements for Patients and

Providers Act: Copayment rate 20%

Part C: Coverage Changes

● Medicare Advantage (MA) Planso 13% higher o Reductions to save $136 b

through 2020 (Kaplan 2011)

o Funding tied to Part A and B o Decrease in plans, future

enrollment? (Afendulis et al. 2012)

Part D: Coverage Changes● Part D donut hole closed by 2020 (Shrank & Niteesh 2011)

o 75% coverage

Results

Medicaid Overview

● Costs● OBRA 1990● SCHIP 1997● ACA 2010● State Examples

Costs

Marton 2007

● Medicaid Spending through Great Recession Cantor 2013

OBRA 1990

● Coverage Required:o Children born after September 30, 1983o Families below 133% PL Gordon 2003

● Coverage by 8% Card 2004

o Take up was <5% Card 2004

● Pregnant womeno 10-15% decrease in uninsured Winter 2011 o 50-60% crowd out rate Winter 2011

o No significant effect on fertility rate Deleire 2011

OBRA 1990

● Cost Shiftingo Physician Costs, Visits

25% doctors, no new patients Decker 2009

o Uninsured: $1,135 out of pocket Expansion # uninsured

Private picks up slack Clemans-Cope 2013

SCHIP

● 1997, expansion for children● Premium= Exit Rate (GA, KY) Marton 2010

● Physician participation Bronstein 2004

● BadgerCare:o coverage 8%, public insurance 25% Wolfe 2006

● Excellent health 1-5 years eligible De La Mata 2012

Affordable Care Act

● Signed 2010, implemented 2013● Poor

o 44% PL o 133% PL Artiga 2015

● Children coveredo Families <133% PL Medicaid.gov

● Eligibilityo TX: 18%, MA: 1%, WI: 4%o Individual Mandate uptake Richardson 2013

● Beneficiaries gain $4,177 Clemans-Cope 2013

Affordable Care Act

Artiga 2015

Affordable Care Act

● Gov HC Spending $12.1

billion Clemans-Cope 2013

● <44% PLo Subsidized at 100% Artiga 2015

o Gap 44% PL - 100% PL Artiga 2015

● Private Insurance 2.7% Blumberg 2012

Massachusetts

● Implemented reform 2006● ER usage 5-8% Miller 2012

o Correlated with Insurance Miller 2012

● 1.3% reporting E or G health Courtemanche 2014

● Inpatient 36% Kolstad 2012

o Evidence of crowding out

● HC Service Price 10.8% Dunn 2015

Massachusetts

Miller 2012

Discussion

Questions?

Questions

● What economic incentives could reduce the nation’s obesity prevalence?

● What are the pros and cons of Wisconsin adopting the Medicaid expansion?