Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CERN-ACC-SLIDES-2016-0014
Future Circular Collider
PUBLICATION
Future Circular Collider, overview
Gutleber, Johannes (CERN) et al.
08 August 2016
The research leading to this document is part of the Future Circular Collider Study
The electronic version of this FCC Publication is availableon the CERN Document Server at the following URL :
<http://cds.cern.ch/record/2206228
CERN-ACC-SLIDES-2016-0014
Overview
Johannes GutleberDirectorate Unit Accelerators & Technologies
Future Circular Collider
cern.ch/fcc
What are the smallest
constituents of matter?
?Do supersymmetric particles exist?
What is dark matter?
Open Questions
What are the fundamental laws
that govern nature?
Roads to Discovery
• Higher Energy
– Probe smaller scales
– Discover new particles
• Higher Luminosity
– Detect rare processes
– Measure fundamental parameters
precisely
EC Strategy Update 2013
“CERN should undertake designstudies for accelerator projects in a
global context, with emphasis on
proton-proton and electron-positron
high-energy frontier machines.”
Kickoff Event February ‘14
330 Participants
Conceptual Design Study
• Form global collaboration
• Study pp/ion collider (FCC-hh)
• Infrastructure driven by FCC-hh
• Study e+e- collider (FCC-ee)
• Understand pe option (FCC-he)
Strategic Goals
• Make funding bodies aware of
strategic needs for research community
• Provide sound basis to policy bodies
to establish long-range plans in
European interest
• Strengthen capacity and effectiveness
in high-tech domains
• Provide a basis for long-term
attractiveness of Europe as research area
HEP Timescale
Physics
25 years
Today CDR & Cost
Construction Physics Upgr LEP
Construction PhysicsProtoDesign LHC
Construct PhysicsDesign HL-LHC
ConstructionProtoDesignFuture Collider
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Time Indicator
Conceptual studies
R & D
Development
Industrialization
Series production
Industry participation
Total
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
~ 15 years
~ 25 years
Case: LHC superconducting dipole magnets
Time Indicator
SIMATIC S5
SIMATIC S7
cRIO
OMRON C-Series
Hitachi H200
Schneider Mod. 984
“Open” IO Control ?
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
Case: PLC (HMI 5-7 yrs, PLC 12 yrs, I/O 16-20 yrs)
Migration
?
Migration
FCC-hh Key Parameters
Parameter FCC-hh LHC
Energy [TeV] 100 c.m. 14 c.m.
Dipole field [T] 16 8.33
# IP 2 main, +2 4
Luminosity/IPmain [cm-2s-1] 5 x 1034 1 x 1034
Energy/beam [GJ] 8.4 0.39
Synchr. rad. [W/m/apert.] 28.4 0.17
Bunch spacing [ns] 25 (5) 25
Preliminary, subject to evolution
Luminosity Evolution
Now
Collision Energy vs. Time2030 2040
100 TeV
FCC-ee Key Parameters
Parameter FCC-ee LEP2
Energy/beam [GeV] 45 120 175 105
Bunches/beam 16700 1360 98 4
Beam current [mA] 1450 30 6.6 3
Luminosity/IP x 1034 cm-2s-1 28 6 1.8 0.0012
Energy loss/turn [GeV] 0.03 1.67 7.55 3.34
Synchr. Power [MW] 100 22
RF Voltage [GV] 2.5 5.5 11 3.5
Preliminary, subject to evolution
Tevatron (closed)
Circumference: 6.2 km
Energy: 2 TeV
Large Hadron ColliderCircumference: 27 km
Energy:
- 14 TeV (pp)
- 209 GeV (e+e-)
Future Circular ColliderCircumference: 80-100 km
Energy:
- 100 TeV (pp)
- >350 GeV (e+e-)
Baseline Layout for Study
Role of CERN
• Host the study
• Prepare organisation frame
• Setup collaboration
• Identify R&D needs
• Estimate costs
Study Timeline
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Explore
Study
Elaborate
Report
Study plan, define scope
Review, select variants
Review, approve material
Release CDR
Review, adjust scope
Key Technologies
• High-field superconducting magnet
• Superconducting RF cavities
• Efficient RF power sources
• Affordable & reliable cryogenics
• Reliability & availability concepts
Special Needs
• Collimation systems
– High energetic beam
• Kickers and separators
– Ultra fast systems
• Dumps and stoppers
– High power absorption
Special Attention
• Alignment
– Precision survey and alignment
– Active systems for FCC-ee
• Vacuum
– High synchrotron radiation
– Mitigate pressure blow-up and
electron/ion clouds
Study Preparation TeamStudy coordination
M. Benedikt, F. Zimmermann
Hadron collider
D. Schulte
Hadron injectors
B. Goddard
e+ e- collider and injectorsJ. Wenninger
Infrastructure, cost estimates
P. LebrunTechnology
Physics and experiments
e- p option Integration aspects
O. Brüning
High Field Magnets
L. Bottura
HadronsA. Ball,
F. Gianotti, M. ManganoSupercon-
ducting RFE. Jensen
e+ e-
Al. BlondelJ. Ellis,P. Janot
Operation aspects, energy efficiency, safety, environment
P. Collier
CryogenicsL. Tavian
e- pM. Klein
Specific TechnologiesJM. Jimenez
Planning (Implementation roadmap, financial planning, reporting)J. Gutleber, F. Sonnemann
Study Organisation
Steering
Committee
Advisory
Committee
Study
Coordination
Group
CERN
Director
General
Collaboration
Board
Hadron
Collider
Physics
and
Experime
nts
Lepton
Collider
Physics
and
Experime
nts
e-p
Physics,
Experime
nts,
Accelerat
ors
Hadron
Injectors
Hadron
Collider
Lepton
Injectors
Lepton
Collider
Accelerat
or
R&D
Technolo
gies
Infrastruc
t.
and
Operation
Costing
Planning
Work Breakdown
LeptonInjectors
HadronInjectors
HadronCollider
LeptonCollider
CivilEngineering
TechnicalInfrastructures
Operation andEnergy Efficiency
Cost Estimates
Implementation
Project RiskAssessment
StudyAdministation
Communications
Safety, RP andEnvironment
ConceptualDesign Report
Lepton-HadronCollider
Hadron ColliderPhysics
Hadron ColliderExperiments
Lepton Collider Physics
Lepton ColliderExperiments
Lepton-HadronCollider Experiment
Lepton-HadronCollider Physics
Integration
Computing andData Services
TechnologyR & D
FutureCircular Collider
Accelerators Infrastructuresand Operation
Implementationand Planning
Study and Quality Management
Physics andExperiments
Achieve high availability and
o p e r a t i o n e f f i c i e n c y
Scale up from CERN accelerator
complex operation experience
P h y s i c s u s e r s
S t a b l e a n d h i g h
l u m i n o s i t y
Funding agencies
U n d e r s t o o d
o p e r a t i o n c o s t s
LHC Availability
Setup6%
Injection4%
Ramp4% Squeeze
3%
Stable Beams83%
Setup28%
Injection15%
Ramp2%
Squeeze5%
Stable Beams
36%
No Beam (access)
14%
Estimated
• 10 hour physics coasts
• No faults, or down time
Observed
6 hour physics coasts
Faults and down time mainly in
no beam, setup & injection
phases
Fault Drivers
Corrective Interventions
Access System, 527
Controls, 158
Cryogenics, 655
Electricity, 455
Fluids, 657
Other, 12
Heavy Handling, 266
Safety Systems, 233
Technical Infrastructure,
124
LHC: 3087 / yr
FCC: 12’500 / yr ?
Reliability & Availability
Methods & Tools
For Analysis
Training of
equipment experts
Analysis of existing
systems, scaling
Design
recommendations
Strengthen long-term attractiveness of Europe
as leading large-scale research location