September 2020 • perenews.com

Fund Domiciles and Regulation

September 2020 • Fund Domiciles and Regulation 11

Analysis

10 PERE • September 2020

Analysis

K E Y N O T E I N T E R V I E W

The Grand Duchy continues to emerge as a strong jurisdiction for managers looking to access European capital and assets, says Nils Mordt

of RBC Investor & Treasury Services

With a population of 626,000 peo-ple, Luxembourg punches far above its weight in the world of private fund management.

Nils Mordt, director, global client coverage, United Kingdom, at RBC Investor & Treasury Services, explains how factors, including internation-al tax reform, Brexit and the Grand Duchy administration’s savvy position-ing to capitalize on the regulatory re-gime introduced under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), have established Luxem-bourg as the domicile of choice for European real estate investment and investors.

Q What trends are you observing in fund

domicile choice globally?Delaware, the Cayman Islands and Luxembourg remain the dominant lo-cations for domiciling private capital funds, particularly real estate funds. Luxembourg has made great strides in gaining market share in the last few years, but it still has some way to go to catch up with Delaware and Cayman, which will likely remain the first choice

for most US managers. We see Lux-embourg utilized for raising European capital and/or for investing in Europe more easily and efficiently, for funds regulated under AIFMD. Due to the recent political and economic uncer-tainty, managers have tended to focus on established jurisdictions where they can engage a breadth of service provid-ers with required experience and exper-tise and access an ecosystem of centers of influence.

Over the past six months the tight-ening of base erosion profit shifting (BEPS) rules has prompted inves-tors to seek clarity from jurisdictions on the stability of their tax treaties.

Luxembourg has benefited due to its clear tax rules and a variety of vehicles available that allow different tax treat-ments to be put in place. Regulators in Luxembourg and Jersey have been forthright in providing clarity on what is acceptable and what the situation is likely to be in those jurisdictions going forward.

Managers raising capital in North America are most likely to domicile funds in Delaware. However, if they are looking to expand their investor base by accessing European capital then the trend has been to develop increasingly complex structures that involve a par-allel fund in Luxembourg, which runs as the same strategy as the main fund. The parallel fund provides their US in-vestors with European exposure while making it easier for European capital to deploy into the structure. It is less com-mon for European managers to launch a fund in Luxembourg and a parallel vehicle in Delaware. On the whole, if they are looking to attain capital from US investors, they establish feeder structures in Delaware instead.

Recently we have begun to see Asia-Pacific-based managers which are relatively new investors into regulated private capital funds, choosing Lux-embourg, given its track record and regulatory framework to set up funds or parallel structures. It is important to note Singapore has introduced its Var-iable Capital Company (VCC) struc-ture, which may appeal to some APAC investors looking to stay local.

Q To what extent do investors influence

managers’ domiciliation decisions? Investors had little sway over choice of jurisdiction five years ago but as of late they have been exercising more influ-ence. Investors that previously focused heavily on allocating money into liquid markets are now increasingly commit-ting capital to private capital funds and

SPONSOR

RBC INVESTOR & TREASURY SERVICES

Luxembourg’s rolling stone gathers momentum

Investors are committing more of their capital to private markets and are increasingly keen to understand how their investments are performing with the touch of a button. This has led many investors to exercise greater scrutiny on domicile fund structures and asset-level performance data. For administrators, that means providing technology solutions that deliver standardized reporting in spite of the increasing complexity of fund structures.

Administrators working with service providers that are able to integrate multiple data sources to provide a full picture of asset performance all the way to the fund structure via data visualization screens or access to platforms and portals will have a competitive advantage. This shift will include a transition from administrators providing large multi-page reports to self-serve and on-demand access to data, including management information (MI) or asset-level data.

The onus has increased on fund administrators to provide detailed asset-level information to managers, observes RBC I&TS’s Nils Mordt

Getting the big-data picture

are demanding a seat at the table when making domicile choices. They tend to have a lot of confidence in sizable and well-known managers which have a strong track record to make decisions about structures and jurisdictions on their behalf.

Investors have the opportunity to exercise more choice when smaller boutique managers are looking to raise capital, investors can exercise more

choice, or at least expect to be kept informed on why a domicile has been chosen. As a service provider, we do not directly influence the choice of domi-cile, but we are frequently asked by our clients what our experience has been in a jurisdiction. For them it is important that we have in-depth knowledge and a strong standing in that market so we can help them access the local service provision ecosystem.

12 PERE • September 2020

Analysis

“Delaware, the Cayman Islands and Luxembourg remain the dominant locations for domiciling private capital funds, particularly real estate funds”

Q Luxembourg has been growing in popularity

among private real estate fund managers. What are the key attractions of the jurisdiction?Luxembourg has experienced a ‘rolling stone’ effect as major players, wheth-er European or US-based, establish structures in Luxembourg. This helps the jurisdiction win more business as investors and managers coming into Europe emulate what they are doing. The established fund management ecosystem in Luxembourg makes it easier to access local legal knowledge and connect with third-party man-agement companies and individuals at the big four accountancy firms. It is a jurisdiction that has been in business for many years which translates to a breadth of talent within the principality but also attracts from the surrounding countries. Pre-covid-19 it was easy to set up a face-to-face meeting with peo-ple with a strong understanding of the structures available and the private cap-ital requirements.

Luxembourg also offers a range of toolkits that enables speed to market for a range of fund requirements so managers are able to launch private fund structures within a matter of a few months. Previously it might have tak-en nearly a year to create a structure. That speed to market is something Luxembourg has really enhanced over recent years by showing the flexibility and pragmatism needed to launch new vehicles which do not just emulate the offering available in other jurisdictions but actually improves it, such as the Reserved Alternative Investment Fund (RAIF) and special limited partnership (SCSp).

In doing so, Luxembourg has stolen a bit of a march on other jurisdictions in terms of AIFMD-compliant struc-tures. The large number of RAIFs that we have created and launched with managers shows that as an unregulat-ed multi-purpose structure it has really

hit the market’s sweet spot, while the commitment the principality has made to grow its alternative funds and private capital business, and the training avail-able to keep talent coming through, gives the bigger managers confidence that they will be able to successfully operate and grow in the long term.

Q How is Brexit favoring the establishment of

Luxembourg-domiciled vehicles?We are still in a wait-and-see phase for Brexit and although every manager is different, some prefer an Irish or Jer-sey vehicle. However, UK managers that have existing offshore funds and want to maintain exposure to Europe have been attracted to Luxembourg as an easier domicile choice. In a situation where Brexit has created uncertainty, regulation in Luxembourg provides clarity on the legal framework around structuring and operating Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) and the cor-porate governance requirements of the management company.

Luxembourg has clearly outlined the procedures that are required to manage and launch funds, and that provides comfort to managers. In

Luxembourg they know what they are going to get. In the face of Brexit, UK managers looking to invest in UK prop-erty with aspirations of raising money from European investors still remains a decision to be made. Some may fa-vor sticking with the UK structures that they know and bring in European investors through feeders in Luxem-bourg, Jersey or Guernsey. We are see-ing some of the UK managers holding back on fund launches, not just because of covid-19, but also because of the on-going uncertainty over whether pass-porting arrangements that allow UK funds to market to European investors will persist after Brexit.

However, some strategies are built on the back of investments in key assets and if those transactions cannot wait then the decision has usually been tak-en to set up a Luxembourg structure.

Q What factors will influence domicile choice in the

post-covid market?The outlook is positive for private cap-ital markets. Research shows robust investor appetite for real estate, infra-structure and other private capital asset classes like private debt. While inves-tors may be slowing down their com-mitments because of covid-19, evidence suggests they will be investing more between 2022 and 2025. We expect to see that allocation growing given the increasing pressure to match returns with liability curves and volatility in public markets.

With all of the market noise gen-erated by covid-19 and by geopolitical turmoil, investors are looking for sta-bility, therefore the big three domiciles are likely to remain popular. Stability in the wider market may not be guar-anteed, but those jurisdictions and Lux-embourg in particular have weathered the pandemic well so far with business continuity planning enabling activity to continue with most professionals work-ing from home. n

Specialist ExpertiseAssured Financial Strength

RBC Investor & Treasury Services™ is a global brand name and is part of Royal Bank of Canada. RBC Investor & Treasury Services is a specialist provider of asset servicing, custody, payments and treasury services for financial and other institutional investors worldwide. RBC Investor & Treasury Services operates primarily through the following companies: Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Investor Services Trust and RBC Investor Services Bank S.A., and their branches and affiliates. RBC IS Bank S.A. is supervised in Luxembourg by the CSSF and the European Central Bank. In the UK, RBC I&TS operates through RBC Investor Services Trust, London Branch & Royal Bank of Canada, London Branch, authorised and regulated by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions of Canada. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority are available from us on request. RBC I&TS UK also operates through RBC Europe Limited, authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Additionally, RBC I&TS’ Trustee and Depositary services are provided through RBC Investor Services Bank S.A., London Branch, authorised by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) and European Central Bank (ECB) and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority are available from us on request. In Australia, RBC Investor Services Trust is authorized to carry on financial services business by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission under the AFSL (Australian Financial Services Licence) number 295018. In Singapore, RBC Investor Services Trust Singapore Limited (RISTS) is licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) as a Licensed Trust Company under the Trust Companies Act and was approved by the MAS to act as a trustee of collective investment schemes authorized under S 286 of the Securities and Futures Act (SFA). RISTS is also a Capital Markets Services Licence Holder issued by the MAS under the SFA in connection with its activities of acting as a custodian. In Guernsey, RBC Offshore Fund Managers Limited is regulated by the Guernsey Financial Services Commission in the conduct of investment business. Registered Office: PO Box 246, Canada Court, St Peter Port, Guernsey, Channel Islands, GY1 3QE, registered company number 8494. In Jersey, RBC Fund Administration (CI) Limited is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission in the conduct of fund services and trust company business in Jersey. Registered office: Gaspé House, 66-72 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE2 3QT, Channel Islands. Registered company number 52624. In Hong Kong, RBC Investor Services Bank S.A. is a restricted license bank and is authorized to carry on certain banking business in Hong Kong by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. RBC Investor Services Trust Hong Kong Limited is regulated by the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority as an approved trustee. ® / ™ Trademarks of Royal Bank of Canada. Used under licence.

Taking a consultative approach to delivering an integrated financial and administrative solution, our General Partner clients benefit from specialist expertise across the entire fund lifecycle to help them achieve their objectives.

To discover how we can support your investment, market and product expansion, visit rbcits.com/pcs

REAL ESTATE | INFRASTRUCTURE | PRIVATE EQUITY | PRIVATE DEBT

HNW_NRG_C_Inset_Transp