FSR 2011 Presentation Final

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    1/31

    Fiscal sustainability report 2011Robert Chote

    Chairman

    13 July 2011

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    2/31

    Preamble

    OBR set up in 2010 to provide independent andauthoritative analysis of the UK public finances

    FSR is our first assessment of the long-term health andsustainability of the public finances, complementing ourmedium-term forecasts

    BRC responsible for the conclusions, drawing on timeand expertise of full-time OBR staff, governmentdepartments and advisory panel

    Chancellor received draft analysis on 30 June and finalreport on 12 July

    No pressure to change conclusions from ministers orapparatchiks

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    3/31

    Our approach in the report

    Look at the impact of past government activity Measures of assets and liabilities on the public sectorbalance sheet

    Make use of new Whole of Government Accounts (WGA)data

    Look at the potential impact of future governmentactivity 50-year projections of spending, revenues and financial

    transactions

    Make projections of budget deficits and public sector net

    debt Judge sustainability and quantify possible need for fiscaltightening

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    4/31

    Our approach in the report

    Look at the impact of past government activity Measures of assets and liabilities on the public sectorbalance sheet

    Make use of new Whole of Government Accounts (WGA)data

    Look at the potential impact of future governmentactivity 50-year projections of spending, revenues and financial

    transactions

    Make projections of budget deficits and public sector net

    debt Judge sustainability and quantify possible need for fiscaltightening

    Four points: 50-year projections inevitably have big uncertainties around

    them Unchan ed olic not alwa s strai htforward to define

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    5/31

    Public sector net debt and net worth

    -20

    -10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    1986-87 1990-91 1994-95 1998-99 2002-03 2006-07 2010-11 2014-15

    Percent

    ofG

    Public sector net debt Public sector net worth

    EFO forecast

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    6/31

    Public service pension liabilities inWGA

    Public service pension liabilities rose 331 billionin 2009-10

    But almost 260 billion of the increase reflected afall in the discount rate from 3.2% to 1.8%, nothigher expected payments

    The discount rate will rise again to 2.9% in 2010-11

    802

    1133

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    10001200

    March 2009 March 2010

    billions

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    7/31

    Private finance initiative capitalliabilities

    29.9

    40

    5.10

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    On balancesheet in PSND

    On balancesheet in WGA

    Total on andoff balance

    sheet

    billioninMarch2010

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    8/31

    Provisions and contingent liabilities

    WGA liabilities include 107bn (7% of GDP) ofprovisions

    Costs where probability of incurring less than 100% butmore than 50%

    Main items: nuclear decommissioning and clinicalnegligence

    WGA also notes 207bn (14.4% of GDP) ofcontingent

    liabilities

    Costs where probability of incurring is less than 50% butmore than 0%

    Main items: 175bn of financial sector guarantees andundertakings

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    9/31

    Stocks and flows

    WGA are a welcome boost to transparency with widercoverage

    They will become increasingly useful as time seriesbuilds up

    But balance sheets alone of limited value in judgingsustainability

    They omit future flows arising from future government

    activity:

    Future spending on public services and transfers

    Future tax revenues

    When in doubt, go with the flows

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    10/31

    Assumptions: demography

    Ageing population pastrises in life expectancy andfalls in fertility plus babyboom bulge

    ONS population projections

    Our central projectionassumes: 65+ proportion rises from

    17% in 2011 to 26% in

    2061 Net inward migration

    averages roughly halfrecent levels

    We also show sensitivity toolder and younger age

    Figuresrefer toannualgrowthrates

    0

    1 0

    2 0

    3 0

    4 0

    5 0

    6 0

    7 0

    8 0

    9 0

    1 0 0

    2 0 1 1 2 0 6 1

    PercentofUKpopulation

    0 - 1 5 1 6 - 5 4 5 5 - 6 4 6 5 - 8 4 8 5 +

    2 . 7

    0 . 9

    0 . 2

    0 . 1

    0 . 2

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    11/31

    Assumptions: economy

    Whole economy productivity growth averages 2% ayear, in line with long-run historical experience

    Also show sensitivity to 1.5% and 2.5% productivitygrowth

    CPI inflation at 2%, consistent with Bank of Englandtarget

    GDP deflator rises 2.7% a year

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    12/31

    Assumptions: unchanged policy

    Income tax / NICs allowances rise by earnings post2015-16 Price up-rating would push 3.9m extra people into higher

    rate tax and would increase receipts by 2.6% of GDP by2030-31

    Most working age benefits rise by earnings post 2015-16 Price up-rating would reduce benefit generosity relative to

    average living standards and would cut costs by 1.6% ofGDP by 2030-31

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    13/31

    Assumptions: unchanged policy

    Income tax / NICs allowances rise by earnings post2015-16 Price up-rating would push 3.9m extra people into higher

    rate tax and would increase receipts by 2.6% of GDP by2030-31

    Most working age benefits rise by earnings post 2015-16 Price up-rating would reduce benefit generosity relative to

    average living standards and would cut costs by 1.6% ofGDP by 2030-31

    Receipts and income losses from proposed asset salesnot included in central projection as details currentlytoo vague to estimate with reasonable accuracy. Butrisks discussed in online annex.

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    14/31

    Assumptions: unchanged policy

    Income tax / NICs allowances rise by earnings post 2015-16 Price up-rating would push 3.9m extra people into higher

    rate tax and would increase receipts by 2.6% of GDP by2030-31

    Most working age benefits rise by earnings post 2015-16 Price up-rating would reduce benefit generosity relative to

    average living standards and would cut costs by 1.6% ofGDP by 2030-31

    Receipts and income losses from proposed asset salesnot included in central projection as details currently toovague to estimate with reasonable accuracy. But risksdiscussed in online annex.

    Assume public services spending rises with per capitaGDP, but show scenario in which unchanged policy

    means raising health spending by 3% a year in realterms to offset weaker productivity growth

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    15/31

    Results: non-interest spending

    2010-11 2015-16 2020-21 2030-31 2040-41 2050-51 2060-61

    Health 8.2 7.4 7.7 8.5 9.1 9.5 9.8

    Long-term care 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.8 1.9 2.0

    Education 6.3 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.0 5.0 5.0State pensions 5.7 5.5 5.2 6.1 6.8 6.9 7.9

    Pensioner benefits 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2

    Public service pensions 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4

    Total age-related spending 24.6 22.0 22.1 24.3 25.6 26.0 27.3

    Other social benefits 6.2 4.9 5.1 5.1 5.0 5.0 5.0

    Other spending 13.3 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4Spending 44.2 36.3 36.6 38.8 40.0 40.4 41.7

    Per cent of GDP

    FSR ProjectionEstimate

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    16/31

    Gross public service pensionpayments

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    2010-11 2020-21 2030-31 2040-41 2050-51 2060-61

    Perce

    ntofGDP

    Existing pensioners and deferreds Existing actives past service

    Existing actives future service Future new entrants

    EFO

    forecastFSR projection

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    17/31

    Results: non-interest revenues

    2010-112015-162020-212030-312040-412050-512060-61

    Income tax 10.3 10.7 10.8 10.8 10.9 10.8 10.9

    NICs 6.5 6.6 6.6 6.5 6.5 6.4 6.4Corporation tax 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8

    VAT 5.8 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.3 6.4

    Capital taxes 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

    Other taxes 10.4 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.4 10.4

    Revenue 37.0 37.6 37.9 38.2 38.4 38.2 38.5

    Per cent of GDP

    Estimate FSR projection

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    18/31

    Non-demographic influences onrevenues

    Outside our central projection, we look at severalrevenue streams:

    income tax: revenues would increase if income growth isskewed toward the top of the income distribution

    transport taxes: better fuel efficiency could reduce revenue

    North sea revenues: projected to decline as production falls

    climate change levy / EU ETS: revenues look likely to rise

    tobacco duty: revenues fall if consumption continues falling

    Net effect: revenues could fall by up to 2% of GDP by2030-31

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    19/31

    Long term revenue and spendingprojections

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    2010-11 2020-21 2030-31 2040-41 2050-51 2060-61

    Perce

    ntofGDP

    Non-interest spending Non-interest revenue

    EFO

    forecastFSR projection

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    20/31

    Primary budget balance

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    2015-2016

    2020-2021

    2025-2026

    2030-2031

    2035-2036

    2040-2041

    2045-2046

    2050-2051

    2055-2056

    2060-2061

    percentofG

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    21/31

    Impact of student loans on PSND

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    2010-11 2020-21 2030-31 2040-41 2050-51 2060-61

    Increase fees and

    maintenance loans by

    earnings

    Increase fees and

    maintenance loans by

    inflation

    Percen

    tofGD

    EFOforecast FSR projection

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    22/31

    Public sector net debt

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    2010-11 2020-21 2030-31 2040-41 2050-51 2060-61

    PercentofGDP

    Constant primary balance

    EFO

    forecast

    FSR projection

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    23/31

    Public sector net debt

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    2010-11 2020-21 2030-31 2040-41 2050-51 2060-61

    PercentofGDP

    Central Constant primary balance

    EFO

    forecast

    FSR projection

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    24/31

    Public sector net debt

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    2010-11 2020-21 2030-31 2040-41 2050-51 2060-61

    PercentofGDP

    CentralConstant primary balance

    Real health spending per person growth of 3 per cent per annum

    EFO

    forecast

    FSR projection

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    25/31

    Economic feedbacks

    Budget deficits provide helpful boost to the economywhen private spending unusually depressed

    But higher debt and deficits over the long term mayreduce national saving, increase interest rates and

    crowd out investment

    This could reduce GDP and worsen fiscal position

    Historical correlations suggest central projection deficitpath would reduce GDP, but only modestly

    But not necessarily good guide to the future

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    26/31

    Sensitivity analysis

    Considerable uncertainty around any 50 yearprojections

    Outlook for debt would be worse if: Population structure older

    Productivity growth slower

    Long run interest rates higher relative to long rungrowth rates

    Higher net migration would improve outlook asimmigrants more likely to be of working age

    But effect will erode as immigrants reach oldage

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    27/31

    Achieving sustainability

    Satisfy inter-temporal budget constraint Permanent tightening of 3% of GDP from 2016-17

    Fiscal gap: achieve PSND of 40% of GDP in

    2060-61 Permanent tightening of 1.5% of GDP from 2016-17

    Permanent tightening of 3.9% of GDP from 2016-17 ifper capital health spending rises 3% a year in realterms

    If structural budget position 1% of GDP better orworse in 2015-16 than we forecast in March,necessary fiscal tightening less or greater by thesame amount

    Could tighten 0.5% of GDP per decade rather than

    1.5% one-off

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    28/31

    Timing the response: one-off

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    2016-2017 2024-2025 2032-2033 2040-2041 2048-2049 2056-2057

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Required adjustment (LHS) PSND (RHS)

    perc

    entofGDP

    percentofGDP

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    29/31

    Timing the response: decade bydecade

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    2016-2017 2024-2025 2032-2033 2040-2041 2048-2049 2056-2057

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Required adjustment (LHS) PSND (RHS)

    per

    centofGD

    percentof

    GDP

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    30/31

    Timing the response: holding debtflat

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    2016-2017 2024-2025 2032-2033 2040-2041 2048-2049 2056-2057

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Required adjustment (LHS) PSND (RHS)

    percentofGD

    percentofGDP

  • 7/31/2019 FSR 2011 Presentation Final

    31/31

    Conclusions

    WGA bring a welcome increase in transparency

    Balance sheets limited as a guide to sustainability

    Ageing population increases fiscal costs, here andabroad

    More tightening likely to be needed post-

    consolidation

    Long term projections uncertain, but should notbe ignored