Upload
ian-jim-bayson
View
119
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Name of FS Student : Ian Jim A. BaysonCourse : BSED- English Year and Section: IIIResource Teacher : Ms. Rhivee Mae Halina Signature: ______________Cooperating School : JH Cerilles State CollegeDate of Visit : January 9, 2015FS #5- Episode 4 : On Scoring Rubrics
My ToolsInterview of my Resource Teacher
1. Where do you use the scoring rubrics? (student outputs or products and student activities)
The teacher said that she uses the scoring rubrics in giving fairly the students’ grade every time they have an activity or performance and every time they to pass an output or a project.
2. What help have scoring rubrics given you? When there were no scoring rubrics yet, what did you use?
The scoring rubrics have given her the feeling of fairness for she is guided every time she gives rating to every performance through the use of rubrics. When there were no scoring rubrics yet, she gives scores directly to students without basis in giving the score.
3. What difficulties have you met in the use of scoring rubrics? She encountered difficulties in the use of scoring rubrics such as having a hard
time in constructing a self-made rubric suited to a performance and providing different scoring rubrics for different activities.
4. Do you make use of holistic and analytic rubrics? How do they differ? She makes use of the two rubrics. She uses holistic rubric most often in assessing
product-oriented performance and she uses analytic rubric most often in a process-oriented performance. Their difference is that analytic rubric has descriptors which make the scoring easy while holistic rubric doesn’t have descriptors.
5. Which is easier to use analytic or holistic? She said it is easier to use the analytic rubric since it is made up of level of scales
and descriptors which make it easier to rate/score performance. With the descriptors, she will be aware on the strength and weaknesses of her students.
6. Were you involved in the making of the scoring rubrics? How do you make one? Which is easier to construct – analytic or holistic rubric?
In the making of the scoring rubrics, or course she was involved. In making, she sees to it that the criteria are relevant to what she wants to measure and asses. She said it is easier to construct the holistic rubric for there is no need to spell out the descriptors.
Research
Types of rubrics
The two types of rubrics are analytic and holistic rubric. An analytic rubric resembles a grid with the criteria for a student product listed in the leftmost column and with levels of performance listed across the top row often using numbers and/or descriptive tags. The cells within the center of the rubric may be left blank or may contain descriptions of what the specified criteria look like for each level of performance. When scoring with an analytic rubric, each of the criteria is scored individually. A holistic rubric consists of a single scale with all criteria to be included in the evaluation being considered together (e.g., clarity, organization, and mechanics). With a holistic rubric the rater assigns a single score (usually on a 1 to 4 or 1 to 6 point scale) based on an overall judgment of the student work. The rater matches an entire piece of student work to a single description on the scale.
When to use rubrics
Rubrics are used to fairly grade our students’ performances/outputs since they are made of criteria and standards with corresponding scores. They are used in assessing learning at all levels.
How to construct the two types of rubrics
In constructing the two types of rubrics, first, define your assignment or project. This is the task you are asking your students to perform. Second, decide on a scale of performance. Third, identify the criteria of the task. Last, describe or spell out the performance of each criterion.
Advantages and disadvantages of scoring rubrics
Advantages
i. Teachers can increase the quality of their direct instruction by providing focus, emphasis and attention to particular details as a model for students.
ii. Students have explicit guidelines regarding teacher’s expectations.iii. Students can develop their abilities as a result of self-assessment.
Disadvantages
i. Teachers may find it laborious in creating and planning the rubric.ii. Students may feel to complete the assignment strictly to the rubric instead of
taking the initiative to explore their learning.
Name of FS Student : Ian Jim A. BaysonCourse : BSED- English Year and Section: IIICooperating School : JH Cerilles State CollegeDate of Visit : January 9, 2015
My Analysis
Scoring rubrics have brought benefits to the teaching-learning process through
providing standard scoring of performance, eliciting self-reflection and peer review and
developing the skills of the students accordingly. Teachers are also benefited through
rating the performances fairly.
Scoring rubric is like portfolio assessment since both are authentic assessment. If
scoring rubrics rate/score process/product-oriented performance, portfolio assessment on
the other hand, uses scoring rubrics to assess learning of students who perform the
portfolio. Meaning, scoring rubrics are guidelines in scoring the portfolio.
The things that should be observed are; they should be realistic, in the sense that
the criteria and the level of perfection should be achievable; and they should be relevant
to the performance/output in order to get the most from scoring rubrics.
Name of FS Student : Ian Jim A. BaysonCourse : BSED- English Year and Section: IIICooperating School : JH Cerilles State CollegeDate of Visit : January 9, 2015
My Reflections
For me, scoring rubric is boon. I consider it as boon or blessing because helps a
lot on the part of the teacher especially in assessing learning of students with regard to the
process and product oriented performance. It is really a blessing since the teacher will no
longer rate the performance without valid basis. Teachers will be guided as to their way
of rating any performance. On the part of the students, still it’s boon because they will be
confident as to how they will be rated. They will be aware on what aspects of their
performance need to be given much attention. Rubrics elicit and promote self-assessment
for at the end of every performance, they can assess what aspects they are weak or good
at. Generally, Scoring Rubrics help foster authentic development and learning of the
students.
Name of FS Student : Ian Jim A. BaysonCourse : BSED- English Year and Section: IIICooperating School : JH Cerilles State CollegeDate of Visit : January 9, 2015
My Portfolio
Scoring Rubric for Paragraph Writing
Criteria 4 3 2 1
Main IdeaTopic
Sentence
Strong main idea/ topic sentence is
clear, and is restated in the
closing sentence.
Adequate main idea/ topic sentence is
restated in the closing
sentence.
Main Idea/ topic sentence is unclear is
weakly restated in the closing
sentence.
Main Idea/ Topic sentence is unclear and is not restated in the closing
sentence.
Supporting Details
Each paragraph has three or more supporting detail
sentences that relate to the main
idea.
Each paragraph has two
supporting detail sentences
that relate to the main idea.
Each paragraph has one
supporting detail sentence that relates to the main idea.
Each Paragraph has no
supporting detail sentences
that relate to the main idea.
Observes Basic Writing Conventions
Contains few, if any punctuation,
capitalization, and spelling
errors.
Contains several errors
in punctuation, spelling or
grammar that do not interfere with meaning.
Contains many errors in
punctuation, spelling and/or
grammar that interferes with meaning.
Contains many errors in
punctuation, spelling and/or
grammar that make the piece illegible.
NeatnessLegibly
handwritten or typed with no
distracting errors.
Legibly written, easy to read with 1-2
distracting errors.
Several distracting errors
that make portions difficult
to read.
Many distracting
errors making it illegible.
Scoring Rubric for Cooperative Learning Activity
Criteria Excellent4 pts
Acceptable3 pts
Minimal2 pts
Unacceptable1 pts
Process
All group members
participate enthusiastically; group members
reflect awareness of others' views and ideas; each group member
assigned a well-defined role;
group members perform roles
effectively
All group members
participate on some level;
group members show some adeptness at interaction;
group members’ roles not always clearly defined nor consistently demonstrated.
About half of group
participates; group members
show some ability to interact; group members given roles but
roles not consistently performed.
One or two group members actively participate; little interaction; no effort made to
assign or perform roles
Organization
Logical format that is easy to
follow; smooth transition from
one idea to another;
organization enhances
effectiveness of project
Presented in a thoughtful
manner; signs of organization and most transitions easy to follow
Somewhat organized; ideas
not presented logically;
transitions not always smooth.
Little signs of organization;
format difficult to follow; awkward
transitions; lack of organization
lessens effectiveness of
project.
Research
Conducts thorough
research using a wide variety of
resources.
Gathers information from several different
sources.
Gathers information from
only 1 or 2 sources.
Does little or no research.
Content
All information is accurate
Information mostly accurate;
a few inconsistencies
and inaccuracies
Information somewhat
accurate; several inconsistencies
and factual errors
Information completely inaccurate
Creativity
Original presentation;
unique approach that enhances the
project
Thoughtful presentation
Presentation includes a few original ideas
Presentation predictable; little creativity used.