8/17/2019 From „I Am That I Am“ and “I Am Not What I Am” to „Yahoo“

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/from-i-am-that-i-am-and-i-am-not-what-i-am-to-yahoo 1/6

From „I Am that I Am“ and “I am not what I am” to „Yahoo“

 jwr47

Introduction

Reading Shakespeare's Othello and remembering „I Am that I Am“ we might be hit by the phrase „Iam not what I am“.

In ebrew the !reators name is to be written as a series o" #onsonants whi#h by the help o" the$others o" Reading %$atres le#tionis& are to be nderstood as (o#als) whi#h #ompli#ates the (owelde#iphering and the naming o" *od in (owel+#ombinations,

-eha) -awhanan %-hanan&) Ia++a %Ia+&) -/) -ah) 0eho(ah) - %-ah&) -ah %ebrew&)ΙΑΗΟ % Iaho in 1atin&) Ia 2 Ia %*reek&) IAΩ3) 5689:;) Iaoe) IA< %=> in *reek and?Iah@ in 1atin&) Iabe  %"or Samaritans&) resp. ABa "or the 0ews4) IOA %:&) Iee) Iee)-ohoa) -ohoah) Ieoa) Ihehoa) 0eho(ahC) iehoahi) Ihe(he) Ioa) Iehoa %D Ioua /Ioue +0piter&) Iohaah) Iehoah %instead o" Ioua&) IeheE , =FGH7  Iaooee) Iabe) IJoieeK.

And as the !reator ΙΑΗΟ %or alternati(ely Yah& had #reated the "irst hman being a##ording to hisimage the "irst man in analogy to his !reator may also ha(e been named Iahu, Yah or Yahoo.

Lsally the names both "or the !reator and his #reatre #onsists o" a series o" (arios (owels.

In his "amos work Mi(ina #ommedia + Naradiso) !anto PIQ Mante had de"ined the !reator'sname as a singlar letter I  ,

Nria #h'i' s#endessi a l'in"ernale ambas#ia) 3 'e"ore I des#ended to angish o" ell) I s'appella(a in terra il sommo bene 34 I was the name on earth o" the So(ereign *ood)onde (ien la letiia #he mi "as#iaT 3C whose joyos rays en(elop and srrond me.

And in #ase the "irst man had been #reated a##ording to his image the "irst hman being might ha(e been named  I   as well. Indeed in Unglish langage this shorthand name has been #hosen as a personal pronon o" the "irst person singlar.

Vhe "irst hman #reatre had been named a##ording to his !reator “IW. Indeed some peoplesdesigned their personal pronon o" the "irst person singlar % iau, ieu, iou& as a deri(ation o" their !reators' names % Diau, Dieu, Diou&3X.

U(en 0ohn /y#li"  %3QC& sed the #apitalied “-33W as the ego+pronon in his Unglish translation o" the ible. In "a#t he named *od “-W in the same sense as Mante in his Mi(ina #ommedia + Naradiso)!anto PI3;

3 Vhe Yame :; Vhe Yame : Vhe b in Iabe may ha(e been nderstood as the “wW or “W %doble &4 Zaestiones in U[odm #ap. P \ ]oted in Vhe Yame O" *od -ehowah. Its Story) y *^rard *erto[C Vhe Yame O" *od -ehowah. Its Story) y *^rard *erto[ A7 + Is *alatino the "irst who introd#ed the name

0eho(ah in 3C3K_E resp. Iehoua or Iihue not deri(ed "rom Ioue %0piter`&) bt "rom "rom Aramai# yihweh) respe#ti(ely ebrew Iehoua

7 owe(er) there are other e]ally reptable s#holars who #an pro(ide e(iden#e that the nderlying *reek o" 0a(e is=FG and not =FGH.

K 1ondon Napyri. l(i) 44E+4K;Q Zelle , Mi(ina #ommedia + Naradiso) !anto PI

3X Vhe NIU !on#ept + Me#oding the Nroto Indo Uropean 1angage33 !AN 4+3 And !ayn seide to the 1ord) $y wi#kidnesse is more than that Y dissere "oryyenesseT lo` + *enesis in

0ohn /y#li""e's Vranslation3; Zelle , Mi(ina #ommedia + Naradiso) !anto PI

8/17/2019 From „I Am That I Am“ and “I Am Not What I Am” to „Yahoo“

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/from-i-am-that-i-am-and-i-am-not-what-i-am-to-yahoo 2/6

In Shakespeare's Othello %#. 3EX3\3EX4& „I am not what I am“ has been said by Iago) the tri#kster with words. U(en his name Iago may be interpreted as ΙΑΗΟ or with a long (owel ΙΑΗΟO.

“I Am that I Am” 

I Am that I Am is the di(ine answer the Unglish translations "or the ible in U[ods ,34 to $oses'

]est "or his name. In e""e#t the response is one o" the most intriging senten#es o" the Vorah. Vhe/ikipedia entry relates this response to “I amW) whi#h %in analogy to the di(ine name& in mostlangages seem to ha(e been en#oded by pre (owels,

 Ehyeh-Asher-Ehyeh %o"ten #ontra#ted in Unglish as "I AM" & is one o" the Se(en Yameso" *od a##orded spe#ial #are by medie(al 0ewish tradition. Vhe phrase is also "ond inother world religios literatre) sed to des#ribe the Spreme eing) generally re"erring

 ba#k to its se in U[ods. Vhe word Ehyeh is #onsidered by many rabbini#al s#holars to be a "irst+person deri(ation o" the Vetragrammaton) see "or e[ample Yahweh. 3

An#ient s#ribes #ommonly transliterated the Sa#red Yame with the *reek letters  IAΩ whi#h was to be e[plained as YAH-O. All o" these letters were long (owels and the long O might also be dobleto -ahoo) whi#h is the horses' name "or the hman beings in *lli(er's Vra(els %37;E) 0onathanSwi"t&. Swi"t may ha(e named the hman beings “-ahooW as an image o" the !reator.

The Yahoo as the „defamation of God and the human being“ 

A se#ond "ndamental #on#ept had been introd#ed by the name Yahoo whi#h Jonathan wi!t  had#hosen "or the hman+like beings in his "amos satiri#al book ulli#ers $ra#els %&'()*. In thissatire the name -ahoo probably had been nderstood as an alternati(e (ariant o" -ahweh34. I alsonderstood the athor already had been #harged "or “de"amation o" *od and the hman beingW3C,

Uspe#ially the -ahoos in the "orth book o" *lli(ers Vra(els had been a##sed by

Pi#torian #riti#s as a „de"amation o" *od and the hman being“ %lwer+1ytton&) whi#hhad to bann this tool „"rom any de#ent hosehold“ %U. *osse&3E.

In the online etymology yahoo %n.& is des#ribed as "ollows,

a brte in hman "orm) 37;E) "rom the ra#e o" brtish hman #reatres in Swi"t's*lli(er's Vra(els. A made name) prob. meant to sggest disgst ?!entryMi#tionary@. cre]. in mod. se) a person la#king #lti(ation or sensibility) a philistineT alotT a hooligan ?OUM@. Vhe internet sear#h engine so #alled "rom 3QQ4.

The Hnea-Yahoos as the antithesis of the godhead 

0onathan Swi"t was an Angli#an minister who stdied ebrew at Vrinity !ollege. t a##ording toIr(ing Y. Rothman37) the -ahoos are des#ribed as Hnea Yahoo) and he said the word Hnea) i" readright+to+le"t as ebrew is read) is the word ayn) or not . “Vhose beasts are the opposite o" *od andthe antithesis o" *od)W he said.

*lli(er) Rothman #on#ldes) “is not in any sense a -ahoo entirely de(oid o" godlike (irtes.Indeed) *lli(er is a hman being a#hie(ing sa(ing gra#e) a hope not a##orded to the -ahoo.W

3 I Am that I Am 34 -ahoo -/ 0P -a+OO'+ah`

3C A 1etter+ased $an3E page ;XE in Mie +lassier er englishen iteratur + atalog der f - Athors Lwe ker) orst reer and Rol"

reer) UV \ U!OY Vas#henb#h Perlag&. Mo#mented %in *erman& in Pon Men Lrsprngen Mer -ahoos37 1ingist U[plains Se#ret 1angage o" *lli(er's Vra(els + Lni(ersity o" oston

8/17/2019 From „I Am That I Am“ and “I Am Not What I Am” to „Yahoo“

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/from-i-am-that-i-am-and-i-am-not-what-i-am-to-yahoo 3/6

8/17/2019 From „I Am That I Am“ and “I Am Not What I Am” to „Yahoo“

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/from-i-am-that-i-am-and-i-am-not-what-i-am-to-yahoo 4/6

In Roman alphabet the long (owels and short (owels shared the same #hara#ters) althogh dia#riti#swere sed as longshort+markers. Vhe dia#triti# "or the I had been de"ined in a ni]e way.

 AEIO 

As a yoth the absbrg emperor crederi#k III #hose AUIOL as his de(i#e;C) bt ne(er e[plained

the meaning o" the alphabeti#al series o" (owels.

 ! 

In old+Yorse (o#ablary the ligatre %#apitalied, & is sed as a word "or eternity) law) marriage)tradition) I) the (erb “to beW) ri(er) water) et#.;E. „) e i A `“ may be translated as, oh) I am in%#lass& A) me too` ;7

All o" these symbolisms arong the long (owels indi#ate a strong #orrelation o" di(ine Yames) thewords "or “IW %ego&) “to beW) eternity) law) matrimony) et#.

The Hermetic "ode#O" #orse I wold ha(e to add this remark to Vhe ermeti# !ode[) Vhe ermeti# !ode[ II + ipolar $onotheism)  Vhe ermeti# !ode[ III + Powel Symbolism  ) Vhe /y#li""e ible  ) Vhe A.U.I.O.L+de(i#e o" crederi#k III ) O(er(iew o" my mans#ripts in a Ytshell Powels "or Uternity) Vho) I and/e + An Analysis o" Nronons) %Vhe !reation 1egend en#oded in a Singlar Powel&  ) U "or Unigma ) Vhe ook *enesis Inside o" a Single /ord) Vhe Se#rets o" the Nronons %Miary cragments;XXQ+;X33&  ) Sa#red Nhonemes + $olding the sa#red words  ) Some Yotes to Sabian Nhilosophyand Vimaes ) Vhe Nrime /ords in Adam's 1angage) Utymology "or My) Viw and %“IW& )   "or 

 ternity + A /orld made o" /ord%s& ) Vhe U+Ins#ription at the Omphalos o" Melphi + Yotes %3& toes by Arthr ernard !ook %3Q;C& ) Images o" *od + Vhe Origin o" the Ugo+Nronons in *od's

 Yame  Vhe Powels' Symbolism in Ar#hai# ymns + Yotes to the (owels in Me Ulo#tione o" Memetris ) Vhe -+Nro#eedings %Vhe -+ey to the Unglish Ugo+Nronons& ) Myas in the *ermani#/eekdays)  Vhe Ugo+pronons and Mi(ine Yames in Sa(oy cren#h Miale#ts  ) “-ioW 2 “MBoW inthe diale#t o" Yimes ) 1amentation "or Vyre and almost 3;XX other te[tbooks o(er(iews and diaries)whi#h remains to be done some day... t I don't "eel (ery moti(ated to pdate the old st"".

;C Vhe A.U.I.O.L+de(i#e o" crederi#k III;E Vhe Strange 1ink etween Smerian A 2 U+/ords and S#andi...;7 Nermtating the Powels

8/17/2019 From „I Am That I Am“ and “I Am Not What I Am” to „Yahoo“

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/from-i-am-that-i-am-and-i-am-not-what-i-am-to-yahoo 5/6

"onc$usion

Shakespeare e[pli#itly de"ined Iago as an antithesis o" *od by e[plaining Iago's #hara#ter as “I amnot what I amW. 0onathan Swi"t des#ribes the -ahoos as “nea -ahooW %not+-ahoos) an antithesis o"*od&. Vhese (owel+ri#h names ha(e been based on IA.

In this sense it might be assmed that,• “I Am that I AmW %o"ten shortened as "I AM"* %in *reek written as IA& in U[ods ,34

#onsists o" long (owels) in#lding a leading I and the "irst %A&) respe#ti(ely last alphabeti#letters %&.

• “IagoW + “I am not what I amW is to be seen as Iago is the opposite o" *od;K.

• “-ahooW probably has been interpreted as “IagoW by 0onathan Swi"t. “IagoW is jst another word "or Swi"t's “-ahooW) whi#h by the Pi#torian #riti#s had been interpreted as a„de"amation o" *od and the hman being“;Q. 0onathan Swi"t was an Angli#an minister whostdied ebrew at Vrinity !ollege) bt most o" the #riti#s didn't nderstand what Swi"t had

intended to say, “nea -ahooW.• “nea -ahooW is the antithesis o! o. A##ording to Ir(ing Y. RothmanX) Swi"t des#ribed

the -ahoos as  Hnea Yahoo) and Rothman #laims the word Hnea) i" read right+to+le"t asebrew is read) is the word ayn) or not . “Vhose beasts are the opposite o" *od and theantithesis o" *od)W he said. *lli(er) Rothman #on#ldes) “is not in any sense a -ahooentirely de(oid o" godlike (irtes. Indeed) *lli(er is a hman being a#hie(ing sa(ing gra#e)a hope not a##orded to the -ahoo.W “!riti#s ha(e re#ognised the (enal and sin"l natre o" the -ahoos) bt none ha(e noted the "a#t that the name nea -ahoo #old represent the-ahoo as the antithesis o" the godhead)W he writes3.

• 0ehowah is the all (owel %7+(owel& #onstr#t "or the di(ine Yame;. A##ording to Memetris

the sage o" “all (owelsW in a proper orer  to "orm a di(ine name had been #ommon inan#ient hymns.

• AUIOL is emperor crederi#k III's de(i#e #onsisting o" the C Roman (owels %sharing thelong 2 short (owels&4) whose symbolism he re"sed to e[plain.

• IA is the original (owel triad whi#h had been sele#ted as a "ondation "or the di(ine Yameand generally all important words in any Indo+Uropean langage) in#lding the ego+

 pronons and the words "or law) marriage) eternity) et#..

• - %0ohn /y#li" ) 3QCC& or I %the ego+pronon and a##oridng to ManteE the original di(ine Yame& is the most important word positioned at the "irst line o" the Swadesh lists %whi#h do

not #ontain di(ine names& and the most important letter in the (owel triad IA.

;K Othello, Iago + !li""sYotes;Q %lwer+1ytton&) %U. *osse& ]oted in page ;XE in Mie +lassier er englishen iteratur + atalog der f - Athors

Lwe ker) orst reer and Rol" reer) UV \ U!OY Vas#henb#h Perlag&. Mo#mented %in *erman& in PonMen Lrsprngen Mer -ahoos

X 1ingist U[plains Se#ret 1angage o" *lli(er's Vra(els3 *lli(er's Vra(els' 'nonsense' langage is based on ebrew; Vhe Sa#red Powels in Nronons + notes to “Vhe $ystery o" the... Vhe Powels' Symbolism in Ar#hai# ymns

4 Vhe A.U.I.O.L+de(i#e o" crederi#k IIIC !AN 4+3 And !ayn seide to the 1ord) $y wi#kidnesse is more than that Y dissere "oryyenesseT lo` + *enesis in

0ohn /y#li""e's VranslationE Zelle , Mi(ina #ommedia + Naradiso) !anto PI

8/17/2019 From „I Am That I Am“ and “I Am Not What I Am” to „Yahoo“

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/from-i-am-that-i-am-and-i-am-not-what-i-am-to-yahoo 6/6

Contents

Introd#tion......................................................................................................................................3

“I Am that I AmW..............................................................................................................................;Vhe -ahoo as the „de"amation o" *od and the hman being“.........................................................;Vhe nea+-ahoos as the antithesis o" the godhead..........................................................................;“IagoW + “I am not what I amW to be seen as another “-ahooW........................................................0ehowah...........................................................................................................................................AUIOL.............................................................................................................................................4

 ......................................................................................................................................................4Vhe ermeti# !ode[ .......................................................................................................................4!on#lsion.......................................................................................................................................C