Upload
doandung
View
217
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Welcome
to the
AAMI Foundation’s
Patient Safety Seminar
with
Brad Winters, MD
Sue Verrillo, MSN, RN, CRRN
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Friday, May 20, 2016
1
What system, structural, and
technological changes are necessary
to capture real-time, critical data of
early deterioration in adult
postoperative inpatients, to prevent
failure to rescue?
AAMI Foundation
• Vision: To drive the safe adoption and use of
healthcare technology
• National Coalition to Promote Continuous
Monitoring of Patients on Opioids
• NEW Opioid Safety & Patient Monitoring
Compendium
• National Coalition for Alarm Management
Safety
• NEW AAMI Foundation Alarm Compendium
• Consider making a donation!
• Contact Marilyn Flack at [email protected].
Thank You to Our Premier
Industry Partners Without their financial support, we would not be able to undertake the various initiatives under the
National Coalition to Promote Continuous Monitoring of Patients on Opioids. The AAMI Foundation
and its co-convening organizations appreciate their generosity. The AAMI Foundation is managing all
costs for the series. The seminar does not contain commercial content.
Platinum Diamond Gold
LinkedIn Questions
Please post questions on the
AAMI Foundation’s LinkedIn page.
OR
Type a question into the question box
on the webinar dashboard.
Nursing Continuing Education Disclosure Statement • This seminar is jointly provided today with our co-provider, the National Association of
Clinical Nurse Specialists (NACNS).
• 1.0 contact hour will be awarded for this seminar. This seminar may be accessed online at
the AAMI Foundation website for nursing CE up to two years from today’s date.
• This continuing nursing education activity was approved by the Alabama State Nurses
Association, an accredited approver by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's
Commission on Accreditation (ANCC).
• Criteria for successful completion includes attendance at the session and submission of a
completed evaluation form. You can submit the fee for the CE credit by going to the AAMI
store at http://my.aami.org/store/detail.aspx?id=PSSOPIOID16-1. . A link to the evaluation form
will be sent to you for completion and a certificate sent to you upon completion of the
evaluation.
• The planning committee members have declared no conflict of interest along with our faculty
for today’s session.
• Contributions to the AAMI Foundation have been received from the identified sponsors to
support program initiatives and projects. However, the program content for today’s seminar
has been planned independently by AAMI staff with the seminar presenters.
• Approval of the continuing education activity does not imply endorsement by the provider,
ANCC or the Alabama State Nurses Association.
7
Speaker Introductions
• Bradford D. Winters, Ph.D., M.D., FCCM
Associate Professor Anesthesiology and Critical Care
Medicine and Surgery / Core Faculty Armstrong Institute for
Patient Safety and Quality
johns Hopkins University and Johns Hopkins Hospital
• Sue Carol Verrillo, MSN, RN, CRRN
Nurse Manager Zayed 11 East
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Awareness of Problem Statement
HealthGrades 2013 has reported that 1 out of
every 10 postoperative Medicare patients
currently dies after developing either:
• Pulmonary embolism/ Deep Vein thrombosis
• Pneumonia/Sepsis
• Shock/ Cardiac Arrest
• Gastrointestinal Bleeding
10
The Sequence of Failure to Rescue
• Patient found “dead in bed”
• Code Blue called
• Everyone runs
• ACLS performed
• Chaos ensues
• If ROSC patient goes to ICU
• If not patients goes to morgue
• Everyone goes back to what they were doing.
Galvanizing the Initiative
• Until the mid 1990’s few ever asked:
** Why did this patient arrest? AND…
** Could we have prevented it?
12
Turn of the Millennium
• Appreciation that most in-hospital cardio-respiratory arrests have a clear “prodrome” began to emerge. • Schein et al. 1990
• Hillman et al., 1991
• Silber et al., 1992
• Smith and Wood, 1998
• McQuillan et al., 1998
• Buist et al., 1999
• Goldhill et al., 1999
• Hillman et al., 2001
• Kause et al., 2004
• Patients don’t suddenly become critically ill, they are just suddenly recognized as such
The Medical Emergency Team
• Developed in response to
the understanding that
arrests don’t suddenly
happen and that we
should be able to intervene
• The MET is not just a team, it
is a patient safety system
• Consists of: • The Afferent Limb (recognition)
• The Efferent Limb (response)
• Administrative System to collect and analyze data
• Education system to train staff
• Other versions include: Rapid Response Team, Patient at Risk Team, Critical Care Out Reach Team, etc.
What does this tell us?
• These numbers have changed little since the first systematic review (there are now at least 7)
• Point estimates have shift slightly • CA incidence reduced by ≈40%
• Mortality reduced by≈ 15%
• Confidence intervals
have tightened
• Our current model
seems to have hit a limit;
• But Why???
9/25/2013 17
Evidence of Afferent Limb Failure
Author Year Salient Point
1
Salient Point
2
Salient Point
3 Buist et al 1999 Median time between
documented instability and
cardiac arrest = 6.5 hrs
Range 0-432 hrs Median # physician visits = 2
without any action
Calzavacca et al 2008 Early recognition is most robust
component
Boniatti et al 2013 Calls delayed 21.4% ↑ delay with physician activators 61.8% mortality with delayed
calls
Simmes et al 2012 16% activations delayed 1-2
days
Vetro et al 2011 20% had objective warning
signs, but no MET call
Shearer et al 2012 4.04% of adult population were
medically unstable
Of those patients, 42% did NOT
have RRT called
Despite 69.2% of the staff
recognizing they met criteria
Bucknall et al 2013 Most patients meeting MET
criteria never have call made
Increases hospital mortality at
30 and 60 days
Oglesby et al 2011 71% ICU admissions delayed
from floors
Adelstein et al 2011 Despite process improvements- 26% of episodes of
deterioration
Associated with delays in care
Frydshou and Gillesberg 2013 Only ½ ICU admits went
through an RRT
Guinane et al 2013 14% of sample met MET criteria
– 4% activation rate
Those meeting criteria had 2
X’s LOS
18
Underlying Causes?
• Certainly some is due to hierarchy / Concept of
patient “ownership”
• More likely poor quality of patient monitoring on
general wards
• Intermittent nature
• Poor fidelity
• Inaccuracy
• Delayed communication
Since 2009 TJC Patient Safety
Goal #16……… • Despite the wide
implementation of RRSs this
has not gotten much better.
• We can provide a response
team (better management
and treatment) but we can’t
seem to eliminate the
failure to recognize the
need to activate that
team
20
“Should we call for help?”
Response to this Afferent Failure:
Risk Scoring Systems
Author Year Finding Finding
Subbe et al 2001 MEWS
“SOCCER” 2006 Extended
criteria catch
earlier signs
Bell et al 2006 Extended
criteria → low
sensitivity & ↑
workload
Restricted
criteria →
missed
opportunities to
intervene
Cretikos et al 2007 ↑specificity for
combo vs
↓ sensitivity and
PPV 15.7%
Maurice &
Simpson
2007 Intermittent vs
unable to id at
risk patients
Gao et al 2007 Systematic
review 36
studies
No scoring
system
adequate
21
Response to this Afferent Failure:
Safety Culture Improvement
• Teamwork Tools
• Adaptive Approaches
• Emphasizing Wisdom of Frontline Staff
• Staff Safety Assessments
• Comprehensive Unit Safety Programs
• TEAMSTEPPs training
• Learning from Defects
22
In response to this Afferent Failure:
"In Pursuit of High Reliability”
Sensitivity to operations: Preserving constant awareness by leaders and staff of the state of the systems and processes that affect patient care. This awareness is key to noting risks and preventing them.
• Changing historic vital sign collection process
• Total patient situational awareness vs.
“snapshot in time”
• Recognizes the dynamic nature of
patient condition
• Providing caregivers with essential data to intervene sooner
• Longitudinal data trending
• Identify vital sign patterns predictive of patient deterioration
• Analyze “inter-relationships” between independent parameters
• Integrate alarm management with current nurse call equipment
• Development of meaningful alarm notification algorithms
Can we do better?
• The RRS Afferent Limb Consensus Conference concluded that, at present and for the foreseeable future, identifying and stratifying who is at risk for clinical deterioration on general wards is difficult and likely to be imperfect despite much research.
• Patients are dying and being harmed and we can’t wait
• They issued a call to industry to partner with clinicians to develop and implement continuous high fidelity monitoring systems that were acceptable to patients, had minimal false alarms, could improve nurse workflow and workload and prevent unrecognized deterioration.
Surveillance Monitoring
• Why? • Because of Afferent Limb Failure
• APSF (2011) • Continuous monitoring while on
parenteral narcotics
• Caregiver notification system
• Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert (2012) • Systematic protocols for assessing, management & opioid dosing
• Continuous monitoring of oxygenation & ventilation
• Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2012) • Respiratory Rate, sedation, and pulse oximetry monitoring of all patients receiving PCA
• Joint Commission New Safety Goal (2014) • Alarm Management & Safety
• Reduce alarm fatigue
• Phased implementation by 2016
Surveillance vs. Condition Monitoring
• Condition Monitoring • The patient has known problems or a predefined risk
for a problem that we are watching for, eg. OSA
• Actionable alarms are likely to be more common
• Surveillance Monitoring is what we should be able to do on the general wards • Risk profile is unclear and possibly undefinable
• We don’t know who is at risk for what
• Actionable alarms are likely to be less common
• We watch not so much for the problem but for the changing risk profile.
Requirements
• ???Needs to be affordable
• Acceptable False alarm rate
• Mobile (hence wireless)
• Able to provide usable
data to clinicians
(communication, human
factors informed data displays etc.)
• Needs to be tolerable to the patient (minimal “probes” and especially no annoying bedside alarms)
• Needs to integrate into nurse workflows and ideally free nursing up for other tasks
• Customizable and individually adaptable
• Interface with EMRs
Dartmouth Experience
• Taenzar et al. (2010) examine use of pulse ox
surveillance monitoring on a post-surgical ward
(orthopedics)
• Average number of alarms was 4/pt/day
• Observed deaths were 2 compared to 4 in pre-
implementation period
Pulse Oximetry
• Taenzar et al. (2014) found in a group of patients
at high risk of prolonged desats (OSA) manually
collected pulse ox values over-estimated
saturation compared to continuous non-invasive
pulse ox surveillance monitoring by an avg of
6.5%.
Rescue events dropped from 3.4
(1.89-4.85) to 1.2 (0.53-1.88)
p=0.01
Unanticipated ICU transfer dropped
from 5.6 (3.7–7.4) to 2.9 (1.4–4.3),
p=0.02
Cohort comparison wards (other surgical
services) had no significant change for
either outcome.
Taenzar et al. 2011 Anesthesiology
We do poorly as well
In Fiscal year 2015:
• 40% of sudden deaths in Johns Hopkins Hospital were
on Zayed 11 East
• 32 Rapid Response Team calls were made and of those
calls:
* 5 patients experienced acute respiratory
compromise, requiring emergent intubation
• So what is best practice for clinicians to detect early
signs of deterioration sooner?
• What is best practice to support and build nurse capacity
in a rapid paced, complex surgical unit?
33
Evidence base for the intervention
• Surveillance monitoring- no official definition, from the literature:
continuous vital sign monitoring, that can measure single or multiple
parameters, with automated alarm alerts sent to a mobile nurse call
device, without requiring a change in the staffing level
• Use surveillance monitoring to provide data of early deterioration
due to sepsis, carbon dioxide narcosis, or terminal arousal failure
due to obstructive sleep apnea
• Automate vital sign collection to give a more accurate picture of the
patient’s physiologic state
• Empower new graduate nurses with continuous vital sign data to
incorporate with assessments to give an integrated clinical picture to
the provider
• Fulfill the National Patient Safety Goal to make alarms safe for all
patients
34
Intervention • IRB approved
• Wireless monitor deployed that recorded continuous vital signs
• HR, RR, Oxygen saturation, BP, Temp
• Created escalation system of alarms and built-in delays to control
false alarms reaching the nurses
• Multi level Education program
• Training
• Feedback
• Listened to nurses and adjusted plans based on their feedback
35
Pilot Team
• Clinical Team
* Dr. Brad Winters
* Dr. Maria Cvach
* Sue Verrillo
* Zayed 11 East
Nursing
* Vendor Clinical
Specialists
• Biomedical
Engineering & IT
* Jeff Frank
* Chuck Sproul
* Jim Mattheu
* Scott Livesay
* Peter Doyle
36
• Middleware
• Assignment management
• Pre-determined alarm escalation
• Wireless Communication System
• Alarm notification
Alarm Notification Integration
Pilot Implementation
• Training
* All staff education
sessions
* Device set up
* Disposable supply
management
* Alarm parameters
* Data collection
• Impact
* Paradigm shift
* Use translational
framework and
methods
* Teach data
integration
* Connect the dots to
show it’s working
38
Purpose: Demonstrate that continuous vital sign monitoring
can identify early, actionable signs of deterioration in adult,
postoperative inpatient, to prevent failure to rescue
PPV= Number of True Alarms
Number of True + False
Alarms
ICU’s are typically in 11-15%
range
Surveillance monitoring was
86 % from 1/30/16 – 3/8/2016
Findings of real, actionable types
of early deterioration:
• 3 Pulmonary embolisms
• 2 New onset a fib
• 3 SIRS/Sepsis
• 3 AMI
• 2 Autonomic dysreflexia in
paraplegic spine patients
• Multiple Hypertension- all
cause
• Multiple Sleep related
disordered breathing
9/25/2013 39
What we have found
(soon to be published)
• False alarms rates are acceptable≈30%
• Large numbers of patients (1/3) never alarm
• A small number of patients account for the vast
majority of alarms, especially false ones
• This is an opportunity for targeted improvement
• Patients like it
• Nurses like it
• Creates real opportunities for saving patients
who otherwise might be found “dead in bed”
Lessons Learned
• Clinical
* Keep repeating the
essential messages
* The details matter-
lost equipment
* Communicate often
to the team
* Be alert to success
and needed tweaks
• Biomedical
* Start early
* Involve all levels to
get a good picture
* Know limitations
* Know competing
priorities
* Align all the moving
parts as best you can
41
Future Ongoing Initiatives
• Communicate findings to colleagues
• Garner interest through internal ongoing updates
• Align with institutional strategic priorities
• Align with national standards
• Persevere to maintain interest
• Keep results on front burner
42
The Goal
Unrecognized clinical deterioration
on general wards resulting in
Failure to Rescue
should be a
NEVER EVENT
Complimentary Resources
Safety Innovations Series
Alarms Management Patient
Safety Seminars
• Webinar Recordings
• Webinar Slides
• Key Points Checklists
NEW Opioid Safety & Patient
Monitoring
NEW AAMI Foundation
Alarm Compendium
Mark Your Calendars!
• Friday, June 24, 2016 @ 12N EDT
• Raising the Bar On Infusion Safety: A Patient Safety
Program at Catholic Health Initiatives
• Mary Kane, MS, RN
Vice President, Regional Chief Nursing Informatics Officer
Catholic Health Initiatives
• To register, please click here.
https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/324531119726
8717057
An application for Nursing CE credit is being submitted for this seminar.
Questions?
• Post a question on AAMI Foundation’s LinkedIn
• Type your question in the “Question” box on your webinar dashboard
• Or you can email your question to: [email protected].
Thank you for attending!
• To learn more about the AAMI Foundation Coalitions and to obtain the
numerous free papers, seminars, and compendiums. Please go to
http://www.aami.org/thefoundation.
• And – again – if you want to obtain a nursing CE credit for attending this seminar,
please go to the AAMI Store at http://my.aami.org/store/detail.aspx?id=PSSOPIOID16-1.
• The credit costs $25. A link to the evaluation form will be sent to you to
complete and then a certificate sent to you upon completion of the evaluation.
Thank You to Our Premier
Industry Partners Without their financial support, we would not be able to undertake the various initiatives under the
National Coalition to Promote Continuous Monitoring of Patients on Opioids. The AAMI Foundation
and its co-convening organizations appreciate their generosity. The AAMI Foundation is managing all
costs for the series. The seminar does not contain commercial content.
Platinum Diamond Gold
Consider Making a Donation to the
AAMI Foundation Today!
Click here to donate online!
Making Healthcare Technology Safer, Together
Thank you for your support!