Upload
bi2458
View
21
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
These are the slides on the current situation of trade policy at WTO & TTIP used in Workshop 1I on Free trade or market regulation within agriculture of the "Voedsel Anders Conferentie -Op weg naar eerlijke en duurzame voedsel-en landbouwsystemen" in Wageningen, the Netherlands , 12 Februay 2016
Citation preview
WTO & TTIPOn the current situation of trade policy
Voedsel Anders Conferentie
Op weg naar eerlijke en duurzame voedsel- en landbouwsystemen
Workshop 1IFree trade or market regulation within agriculture
Wageningen 12 Februay 2016
• What happened at the WTO in Nairobi (agriculture on the agenda of “MC10”)
• New agreements on “export competition”• New safeguards for farmers in developing
countries • New rules to ensure food security
• Implications of TTIP for agriculture • Differences in environmental, health and animal
welfare standards. The problem and what could be done if we wanted
• Impact on farmers outside US & EU
Outline
What happened at the WTO in Nairobi (agriculture on the agenda of “MC10”)
• New agreements on “export competition”
EU and USA don’t have to make any relevant changes on
agriculture export competition
• Export Subsidies (EU)
• “Food Aid” and “Export Credits” (USA)
EU does not have to make new changes on agriculture export subsides
USA succeed to prevent to be forced by WTO to make any significant changes on agriculture export competition
USA do not use “export subsidies”
Now some new rules on “food aid” and “export credits”
But ! Rules are too soft.
Worse than original 2005 WTO text (Ref4)Requires no significant new changes in US policy
This Nairobi agreementprevents any significant changes in the future
This dossier is now closed at WTO
What happened at the WTO in Nairobi (agriculture on the agenda of “MC10”)
• New safeguards for farmers in developing countries • New rules to ensure food security
EU and USA blocked new WTO rules to safeguard farmers in developing
countries and ensure food security
• Public stockholding for food security purposes
• Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM)
Public stockholding for food security purposes (example India)
State buys staple crops from small and poor farmers at price of “cost of production” if that’s above market price
These staple crops are then sold at a very low (symbolic) price to poor people
If this law gets implemented. India would exceed the allowed amount of subsidies
It was agreed at WTO in 2013 (by consensus but against the wish of EU & US) to find a permanent solution to this
problem
Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM)
A tool that will allow developing countries to raise agriculture tariffs temporarily to deal with import surges or price falls.
Impact of TTIP on Agriculture
How many farmers are there in the EU and US ?
Europe : 13,7 million farmers average farm size of 12 hectares
USA : 2,0 million farmers average farm size of 180 hectares
(source EU commission 07/08/2013)
Effect of a free EU-US agriculture market
Regulatory issues and “Non-Tariff Barriers”
Aim: to align the way how the economy is regulated in EU & US
harmonization = higher or lower standard ?
“harmonization” “mutual recognition”
Different:history, paradigms, philosophies of regulationEU: “precautionary principle” US: “science-based”
No easy tradeoffs
TTIP negotiations already have an impact now
after a general statement of support for TTIP
“[...] However, [we] would like to bring to your attention an EUproposal being considered to regulate pesticides which if implemented could prevent 40% of current U.S. agricultural commodity exports from entering the EU.
We believe that such domestic EU regulation, if finalized and implemented, can imperil the TTIP. […]”
Letter to US government (USTR)from CropLife America 13/11/2013
What could be done (if wanted)
Regulatory issues and “Non-Tariff Barriers”
Different internalization of social and environment costs
Regulatory issues and “Non-Tariff Barriers”
Different internalization of social and environment costs
Impact of TTIP on agriculturein developing countries
“Trade diversion”Lower import barriers for one country (EU/US)
-> replaces import from another country
TTIP => “Preference erosion”Example Beef Botswana
Botswana signed EPA to keep trade preferences for beef.But now, the country must (more or less)
fully open its market to EU imports
32 min Video YouTube
http://bit.ly/TTIP-wurTTIP Why it Matters
19.11.2015
“TTIP: what it means for our democracy and ethical considerations on the
environment, agriculture and legalsystem”
Want to know more about TTIP ?
Thank YouBurghard Ilge
Email: [email protected]: @bibothendsWebsite: www.bothends.org