1
FOXCONN INDIA’S PLANT SHUTDOWN: WORKERS – UNIONS – MANAGEMENT DEADLOCK Set in the backdrop of Foxconn’s shutdown of its Indian operations, this case study sensitizes the participants to the circumstances that led to the closure of its Indian operations and whether Foxconn was right in the way it contracted its closure. The participants can discuss and debate on the actions of the workers and unions at Foxconn India, using the relevant legal provisions governing such actions and the possible recourse for the aggrieved employees. Citing the reason of ‘no orders from Nokia’, all the Foxconn employees were placed under paid-holiday-leave status, from December 22 nd 2014. The trade unions and Assistant Labour Commissioner termed the lockout ‘illegal’, as the company did not follow the legal procedures before announcing the closure. Employees, under the guidance of their trade unions, resorted to protests, hunger strikes and forced entry into the factory premises. Under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, can the management and the workers resort to such actions? How should both parties deal with their respective issues under the provisions of relevant Acts? Pedagogical Objectives To understand how Foxconn's operation in TSEZ/Nokia SEZ contributed to and affected the manufacturing and employment ecosystem To understand the factors contributing to Foxconn's shutdown of Indian operations and the resultant labor unrest and the unified agitations from Trade Unions To discuss and debate whether Foxconn's reasoning for shutting down it Indian operations was justified To examine the efficacy of actions taken by Foxconn's management, unions and employees To understand the relevant provisions of lock-out/closure, lay-offs and strikes as enshrined in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Trade Unions Act, 1926 and examine the efficacy of the actions taken by Foxconn and its employees Case Positioning and Setting This case study can be used in either MBA or Executive MBA or Executive Development Programs, for the following modules/topics in the Human Resource Management course: Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining – To understand the role of the Laws and Acts in preventing the disputing parties from taking wrong actions and facilitating a meaningful collective bargaining advantage Trade Unions Act, 1926 and Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – To sensitize the participants to the right and wrong of the actions like closure, strikes and collective bargaining as interpreted from the Acts ABSTRACT © www.etcases.com

Foxconn India’s Plant Shutdown: Workers - Unions - Management Deadlock

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Set in the backdrop of Foxconn’s shutdown of its Indian operations, this case study sensitizes the participants to the circumstances that led to the closure of its Indian operations and whether Foxconn was right in the way it contracted its closure. The participants can discuss and debate on the actions of the workers and unions at Foxconn India, using the relevant legal provisions governing such actions and the possible recourse for the aggrieved employees. Citing the reason of ‘no orders from Nokia’, all the Foxconn employees were placed under paid-holiday-leave status, from December 22nd 2014. The trade unions and Assistant Labour Commissioner termed the lockout ‘illegal’, as the company did not follow the legal procedures before announcing the closure. Employees, under the guidance of their trade unions, resorted to protests, hunger strikes and forced entry into the factory premises. Under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, can the management and the workers resort to such actions? How should both parties deal with their respective issues under the provisions of relevant Acts?

Citation preview

  • FOXCONN INDIAS PLANT SHUTDOWN:WORKERS UNIONS MANAGEMENT DEADLOCK

    Set in the backdrop of Foxconns shutdown of its Indian operations, this case study sensitizes the participants tothe circumstances that led to the closure of its Indian operations and whether Foxconn was right in the way itcontracted its closure. The participants can discuss and debate on the actions of the workers and unions atFoxconn India, using the relevant legal provisions governing such actions and the possible recourse for theaggrieved employees. Citing the reason of no orders from Nokia, all the Foxconn employees were placed underpaid-holiday-leave status, from December 22nd 2014. The trade unions and Assistant Labour Commissionertermed the lockout illegal, as the company did not follow the legal procedures before announcing the closure.Employees, under the guidance of their trade unions, resorted to protests, hunger strikes and forced entry intothe factory premises. Under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, can the management and theworkers resort to such actions? How should both parties deal with their respective issues under the provisions ofrelevant Acts?

    Pedagogical Objectives

    To understand how Foxconn's operation in TSEZ/Nokia SEZ contributed to and affected the manufacturingand employment ecosystem

    To understand the factors contributing to Foxconn's shutdown of Indian operations and the resultant laborunrest and the unified agitations from Trade Unions

    To discuss and debate whether Foxconn's reasoning for shutting down it Indian operations was justified

    To examine the efficacy of actions taken by Foxconn's management, unions and employees

    To understand the relevant provisions of lock-out/closure, lay-offs and strikes as enshrined in the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 and Trade Unions Act, 1926 and examine the efficacy of the actions taken by Foxconnand its employees

    Case Positioning and Setting

    This case study can be used in either MBA or Executive MBA or Executive Development Programs, for thefollowing modules/topics in the Human Resource Management course:

    Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining To understand the role of the Laws and Acts in preventing thedisputing parties from taking wrong actions and facilitating a meaningful collective bargaining advantage

    Trade Unions Act, 1926 and Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 To sensitize the participants to the right andwrong of the actions like closure, strikes and collective bargaining as interpreted from the Acts

    ABSTRACT

    www.etcases.com