52 PART II   •  REPTILEGROUPS

CHAPTER 7

Lacertilia (Lizards, Skinks, Geckos) and Amphisbaenids (Worm Lizards)Ryan S. DeVoe

BIOLOGY AND TAXONOMYThe suborders Sauria/Lacertilia and Serpentes are found within the order Squamata, which contains between 6500 and 7000 species, depending on current taxonomic understanding. Approximately 5500 of the Squamates are assigned to the suborder Sauria/Lacertilia and are commonly referred to as lizards. A number of clades exist within the suborder Sauria/Lacertilia, including Iguania, Gekkota, Scincomorpha, Anguimorpha, and Amphisbaenia. These clades are further broken down into families, of which the Iguanidae, Agami-dae, Varanidae, Scincidae, Chameleonidae, and Gekkonidae contain the vast number of species. The family Scincidae contains the largest number of species (approximately 20% of all lizard species), whereas other families such as the Helodermatidae contain only two species.

Lizards are extremely successful reptiles and inhabit myriad habi-tats worldwide, ranging from desert to aquatic, temperate to tropical, fossorial to arboreal. Lizards have evolved to effectively take advan-tage of all these different habitats. The only continent on which lizards do not naturally occur is Antarctica. As would be expected with such a large and varied taxa, dramatic variations in anatomy, physiology, dietary strategy, and reproduction exist among species. Animals within the Sauria/Lacertilia range in size from the Komodo dragon (Varanus komodiensis), which may reach lengths over 3 meters (m) and weights exceeding 100 kilograms (kg) to some species such as the dwarf chameleons (Brookesia sp.) and geckos (Spaerodactylus sp.), which may not exceed 2 centimeters (cm) in length.

Lizards are very popular as exhibit animals in zoos, aquaria, museums, and private collections. When properly managed, many lizard species are spectacular on display, hardy, and long-lived. Some species such as bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps) and leopard geckos (Eublepharius macularis) have gained great popularity as pets and are propagated in large numbers to supply the pet trade. Rela-tively large amounts of information regarding the husbandry, repro-duction, and medical care of these common species is available and may be judiciously extrapolated for use with similar species.

ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGYMuch variation exists in the anatomy and physiology in the Sauria/Lacertilia suborder; however, most lizards share a basic body form, and all others are variations on that theme. Most lizards have four well-developed legs and a tail.

The dentition of most lizards is classified as either acrodont (agamids, chameleons) or pleurodont (iguanids). Acrodont teeth are fused to the biting edge of the mandibles and the maxillae. Pleur-odont teeth are attached to the periosteum on the medial surface of the mandibles and maxillae. Clinically, this is significant, as pleur-odont teeth will regenerate if lost or broken, whereas acrodont teeth will not.20

Some lizards such as monitors and tegus have long, forked tongues, which are very similar to those seen in snakes and used for tracking prey. True chameleons have very long tongues (over a full body length) with a sticky, fleshy tip that is used for capturing prey. The tongue is supported and propelled or retracted by specialized lingual muscles, the hyobranchial apparatus, and elastic collagen tissue. Most other lizards have fleshy, mobile tongues that are also used to prehend food and as chemosensory organs, but they are much less specialized than those in the taxa previously mentioned. In some species such as the common green iguana (Iguana iguana) the rostral portion of the tongue is dramatically different in color and appearance compared with the caudal portion, and the line of demarcation between the two regions is obvious, leading many clini-cians to assume the presence of pathology, when this is, in fact, normal anatomy.

Renal anatomy varies according to species, and exact location may be very significant to the clinician. In iguanids and some other species, the kidneys are found dorsally within the pelvic canal. In the normal animal, they are not palpable except via digital examina-tion of the cloaca in a large enough specimen. In other species such as monitor lizards, the kidneys are found further cranial, well clear of the pelvic canal. Renal biopsies are relatively common procedures

CHAPTER 7   •  Lacertilia (Lizards, Skinks, Geckos) and Amphisbaenids (Worm Lizards) 53

Lizards, like most nonavian reptiles, are ectothermic and behav-iorally thermoregulate by movements within their environment. Ectothermic animals vary their body temperatures according to the prevailing metabolic need, so to function properly, they require access to a thermal gradient within their preferred temperature zone. Gradients are also important with other parameters such as light and humidity.

Minimum acceptable size for a lizard enclosure varies according to species with regard to not only the size of the lizard but also the activity level and flight distance. Bigger is typically better in most cases. The size of the enclosure should allow the animal to move about freely and accommodate creation of multiple comfortable resting spots for the animal. Obviously, the orientation of the cage should reflect the habits of the lizard. Arboreal species should be provided with a vertically oriented enclosure with appropriate climb-ing structures. Terrestrial and burrowing species should be given a horizontally oriented habitat with plenty of appropriate substrate. It is important that the lizard be able to choose its own appropriate environmental temperatures, humidity, and light exposure while feeling safe and secure. Many lizards will choose security over proper temperature, so basking spots need to be secure enough for the animals to use them properly. In a similar fashion, some lizards will choose thermal needs over the need for exposure to ultraviolet B (UVB) rays. Therefore, if possible, the artificial light and heat source should be combined.

Substrate may vary, including artificial materials such as newspa-per and indoor–outdoor carpeting.

An overriding concern with any captive lizard enclosure is hygiene. Regardless of how beautiful and functional the habitat is otherwise, it if it cannot be properly serviced, it is useless and poten-tially harmful to its inhabitants.

PHYSICAL RESTRAINT AND HANDLINGPrior to the capture and physical restraint of a lizard, a basic plan should be in place to minimize handling time, and all necessary equipment should be assembled prior to getting the animal in hand, if possible. Also, care should be taken to provide secondary contain-ment, if possible, in case the animal evades capture and escapes the primary enclosure.

Lizards are capable of inflicting damage on a handler through bites, scratches, and tail lashes. The size and conformation of the species determines the risk involved. A house gecko (Hemidactylus sp.) bite may be essentially ignored, but a bite from a species such as a crocodile monitor (Varanus salvadorii) may warrant a trip to the emergency room and may even result in permanent disability.

It is important to know the species’ behavioral profile when plan-ning a capture-and-restraint episode. For instance, it is helpful to know that many monitor species will initially defend themselves by delivering surprisingly accurate tail lashes. If that does not deter the person attempting the capture, they will quickly resort to biting and scratching.

Most lizards may be safely restrained by gaining control of the head and neck with one hand and the pelvic area with the other. With large and aggressive animals, the judicious use of towels and leather gloves may help facilitate capture and restraint and provide an extra measure of safety. Very large lizards such as Komodo dragons, water monitors, and crocodile monitors may require mul-tiple personnel or chemical restraint to work with safely.

On the other end of the spectrum are very small or fragile species that pose no threat to the handler but are easily injured if extreme care is not employed. Certain gecko species have extremely thin and delicate skin, which may be torn as they struggle to escape restraint. Some species with tail autotomy will drop their tails, even if the handler is not actually touching it. There is also the possibility of other injuries associated with attempted or successful escapes from handlers, including fractures, crushing wounds, and so on. When working with these very small, delicate species, it is often easiest to perform most of the examination with the animal inside a clear

in lizards, so it is important to have a general idea of where the kidneys are normally located.16

Some lizard species have urinary bladders that communicate via a short, relatively wide urethra with the ventral aspect of the urodeum. The ureters deliver urine into the dorsolateral walls of the urodeum and do not connect directly to the urinary bladder when present. Many lizards (monitors, bearded dragons) do not possess urinary bladders and store urine in the colon, when necessary. Postrenal modification of urine in the bladder or the colon is pos-sible, and the bladder serves as an important fluid storage organ in species from arid regions.

All lizards have three-chambered hearts and are capable of shunt-ing blood past the lungs to varying degrees. Much has been made of the clinical significance of the renal portal system, which allows for perfusion of the renal tubules when glomerular filtration is diminished, as might occur when the animal is conserving water. In the few studies that have been performed, administration of medica-tions in the caudal portion of the body and passage through the renal portal system do not seem to affect drug pharmacokinetics in a clini-cally significant manner. Despite this fact, many clinicians still pref-erentially administer drugs, especially potentially nephrotoxic drugs, into the cranial portion of the body. 16

Some species (iguanas, geckos) are capable of tail autotomy, which is used as a predator avoidance strategy. Tails capable of autotomy reflexively fracture along specific planes and are cast with little to no hemorrhage. The tails will continue to wiggle vigorously after being cast, and ideally distract the predator, allowing the lizard to escape. The veterinary clinician should recognize which species are capable of casting their tails, as some will do so in response to even careful handling or simply to severe stress. Other lizard species have prehensile tails (chameleons, certain skinks), which aid in living an arboreal lifestyle.20

For many years, the members of the family Helodermatidae were the only lizards identified as venomous. In recent years, venom and associated glands or delivery systems have been identified in a number of lizard species, including monitors and agamas. Most notable is the Komodo dragon, which historically was thought to incapacitate prey by inducing septic shock via transfer of oral bac-teria to bite wounds. It has been shown that it is a potent venom produced by the lizard, not bacterial toxins, that can dramatically impact blood pressure and hemostasis, incapacitating the prey fol-lowing a bite. The venom delivery system in lizards differs from those in snakes in the location of the venom glands (along the mandible in heloderms) and the presence of many ducts that release venom at the base of teeth versus the single ducts and hypodermic-like fangs of snakes.11

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is fairly simple in most species of lizard. A simple stomach and relatively short, unconvoluted intesti-nal tract are commonly found. Some herbivorous species such as green iguanas are hind-gut fermenters and have well-developed cecae and large sacculated colons.6

SPECIAL HOUSING REQUIREMENTSMuch of a captive lizard’s health depends on provision of a proper environment. It is critical that configuration of the captive environ-ment reflect the natural history of the animal. Temperature, light, humidity, and ventilation, as well as the size, spacial orientation, substrate, and cage furniture, are all extremely important parameters that need to be considered when creating the optimal lizard habitat. Many species will survive and even reproduce in spartan accom-modations consisting of little more than a plastic box with newspa-per substrate, a water bowl, and a hide box. However, a more recent trend is toward the provision of more naturalistic accommodations for all captive reptiles, including lizards. The animals are more visu-ally pleasing when accommodated in naturalistic environments, and they also are more likely to exhibit a wider variety of behaviors that one might not see if the animals were provided with a less stimulat-ing environment.

54 PART II   •  REPTILEGROUPS

Propofol is a common choice for induction of anesthesia in lizard species as long as intravenous or intraosseous access is possible. Use of propofol in lizard species is typically associated with very rapid onset of effect and recovery. Propofol may be used as a sole anesthetic agent through continuous rate infusion or delivery of repeated boluses.1 In recent years, alfaxolone has become available in some countries and is in the process of evaluation for distribution in the United States. Alfaxolone has properties very similar to propofol with regard to induction, recovery, and minimal effect on cardiopulmo-nary status in lizards but has the very important added benefit of being effective when administered intramuscularly. When more widely available, alfaxalone will likely become the preferred anesthe-sia induction agent in most reptiles, including lizards.2,31

Ketamine is still a viable choice of injectable anesthetic for lizards, especially large and dangerous animals that may require remote drug delivery. However, induction and recovery times with ketamine may be quite unpredictable and prolonged. The effect of ketamine may be enhanced by addition of an α-2 agonist or benzodiazepine (diaz-epam or midazolam). Tiletamine-zolazepam may also be used effec-tively and usually results in rapid inductions, but recovery time may be extended.

Isoflurane and sevoflurane are frequently used for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in lizard species. Induction using inhal-ants may be difficult and prolonged, as lizards as well as other reptiles are capable of shunting blood away from their lungs and hold their breath for extremely long periods without any adverse effect. Rapid anesthesia induction for very short procedures such as venipuncture in diminutive species may be accomplished by placing the animal in an airtight container with a cotton ball soaked in iso-flurane or sevoflurane. The resultant percentage of agent to which the animal is exposed is extremely high, so the animal should be monitored very closely and removed from the container as soon as adequate anesthesia is achieved. Small lizards may easily be eutha-nized via this method simply by leaving them in the container for an extended period.

Monitoring the physiologic parameters of lizard patients during anesthesia is important; however, critical limits to measured param-eters are unknown in most cases. Nonetheless, it is probably best to try to maintain parameters such as heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature as stable and close to what would be seen in a healthy, awake animal as possible. Much of the currently available monitoring equipment may be used with the larger lizard species. However, some lizards are so small that even a fingertip Doppler probe is too big for them. Caution should be used to not overinterpret the mea-surements delivered by equipment that has not been validated for

container or anesthetized. A strategy that may be used with small geckos or other lizards is to induce anesthesia with an isoflurane or sevoflurane-soaked cotton ball in a sealable plastic bag. Most of a physical examination may be performed with the animal in the bag, and if venipuncture is required, the tail may be accessed by cutting the corner off the bag to exteriorize the tail. Care should be taken to work quickly with this method, as gas anesthetic levels created are quite high and could result in an overdose.

Frequent handling of some species of lizard (and many other taxa for that matter) may result in significant stress, which may affect the general health of the animal. True chameleons are notorious for this, so in most situations, handling should be kept to a bare minimum. Some captive animals may seem very docile, bonded to their keepers and not at all perturbed by handling; however, these individuals are the exception to the rule.

FEEDINGThe nutritional requirements of the animals with the sub-order Lacertilia are incredibly varied. Lizards may be carnivores, insecti-vores, herbivores, or omnivores. Additionally, many species have very specific nutritional needs, being adapted to exploit particular resources in the wild. For instance, the caimen lizard (Draecena guianensis), a large and attractive species from South America, feeds exclusively on snails in the wild. Other specialized feeders include the horned lizards, which prey exclusively on ants and termites, and marine iguanas, which feed on marine vegetation. These special-ized feeders create challenges in situations of captivity. Sometimes the preferred food item may be replaced with items more readily available with good results. However, in most situations, the animals will do poorly and refuse to accept anything but the preferred foodstuff.

A difficult issue to address in captivity is that with the exception of the specialized feeders, most wild animals are probably consuming a large variety of food items that are not readily available in captivity. Most captive animals receive very little variation in their diets, which may lead to unrecognized deficiencies.

Obesity is a common nutritional disorder in captive lizards. Captive animals expend much less energy than their wild counter-parts, and well-meaning lizard keepers tend to enjoy interacting with their animals by feeding them. The consequences of obesity in lizards and reptiles in general are thought to mirror those seen in mammals, and clinical experience would suggest that this is true. Orthopedic disease, cardiovascular disease, and GI and reproductive dysfunc-tions all seem related to obesity in captive lizards. Care should be taken to limit caloric intake and maximize physical activity in captive animals to avoid the development of obesity. Data from wild animals may be used to guide weight management in captivity.9 It is impor-tant to remember that most wild animals appear too thin to the average keeper!

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIAChemical immobilization may be required when an animal is poten-tially dangerous to the handlers or the procedure requires an immo-bile patient or is likely to induce pain. Many options exist for anesthesia in lizards (Table 7-1), and the choice of a plan for anes-thesia should be based on the species, the animal’s condition, and the reason for the procedure rather than adopting a “one size fits all” approach. Preanesthesia evaluation and planning are critical pieces of the puzzle, as it is unwise to attempt to anesthetize an animal with severe physiologic derangement unless absolutely necessary. Lizards, like most other reptiles, are sometimes capable of withstanding changes in fluid and electrolyte balance, circulation, and so on that would quickly result in the death of most mammals. Even though these animals may withstand these insults to a point, anesthesia may be the proverbial “straw that broke the camel’s back” and result in the death of an animal that may have been able to recover if given proper support.

TABLE 7-1

Selected Sedative or Anesthetic and Analgesic Agents Used in Lizards

Generic Name Trade Name Dose (mg/kg) Reversal Agent

Diazepam Valium 0.2–1.0 Flumazenil

Midazolam Versed 0.5–2.0 Flumazenil

Butorphanol Torbugesic 0.4–2.0 Narcan

Ketamine Ketaset 5.0–20.0 —

Tiletamine/zolazepam

Telazol 4.0–6.0 Flumazenil for zolazepam

Medetomidine Dormitor 0.06–0.15 Atipamezol

Propofol Propofol 3.0–5.0 —

Alfaxolone Alfaxan 6–15 —

Morphine — 1.5–10 Narcan

Meloxicam Metacam 0.1–0.5 q24h —

Ketoprofen Ketofen 2 q24h —

CHAPTER 7   •  Lacertilia (Lizards, Skinks, Geckos) and Amphisbaenids (Worm Lizards) 55

thoroughly from all angles. When evaluating soft tissue change, MRI is superior to CT, so in cases specifically evaluating the central nervous system or coelomic organs for mass lesions, MRI is the preferable modality. 32

Because of lizards’ stoic nature and ability to withstand significant insult without resultant changes in hematology or plasma biochem-istry parameters, it is often necessary to directly visualize and collect biopsies of diseased tissue to make a diagnosis. Minimally invasive surgical techniques with endoscopy are frequently employed to assess lizards and collect samples.8 These techniques are useful even in extremely small patients, as telescopes in the 2- to 3-millimeter (mm) range are available. Coelomic structures, as well as those in the GI, respiratory, and reproductive tracts, are all accessible via endoscopy. In addition to collection of diagnostic samples, endos-copy is also frequently used to determine sex in monomorphic species and to perform certain surgical procedures.

Collection of blood for hematology and plasma biochemistry analysis is a routine procedure in the evaluation of lizard patients.29 It is generally accepted that an amount of blood of between 0.5% and 0.8% of body weight in grams may be collected safely in most lizard patients. Proper handling of the sample is important to obtain the most accurate information possible. Lithium heparin is the most commonly used anticoagulant in reptile species; however, ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is considered the anticoagulant of choice in some species such as the green iguana and Chinese water dragon. Heparin may create clumping of leukocytes and thrombo-cytes and cause a blue cast to blood films, which makes evaluation difficult. Therefore, it is recommended that blood films be made prior to placement of the sample in the anticoagulant or very soon thereafter. A number of reference ranges have been published for various species (Tables 7-2 and 7-3), but it is important to under-stand that these values rarely represent true “normal reference ranges.” Nonetheless, these reports may serve as a starting point for evaluation of clinical cases. Diagnostic blood samples from lizards are usually collected from the ventral coccygeal vein, but other options include the ventral abdominal vein, the jugular vein, and the cranial vena cava.28 Samples for blood gas analysis may be collected from the lingual veins, as the blood in these vessels approximates arterial samples.

Many lizards are presented in severely debilitated states and suf-fering from chronic disease. In these cases, multiple organs are often involved in the process, and septicemia is frequently encountered. Aseptic collection of a blood sample for culture is warranted in these severely chronic cases and may provide information critical for suc-cessful treatment. Blood samples should be cultured for both aerobic and anaerobic bacterial isolates.

SURGERYThe first step to performing successful surgery on lizard patients is a sound understanding of normal anatomy. Some literature exists to guide veterinary clinicians, but nothing replaces first-hand experi-ence. The interested clinician should take every opportunity to perform postmortem examinations on as many species as possible to gain experience. If no other options exist, it may be necessary to extrapolate from information known about similar species. Other requirements for lizard surgery include appropriate equipment, which is usually based on the size of the patient. With tiny patients, microsurgical instruments, magnification and light, and hemostatic implements such as radiosurgery and hemostatic clips are especially important.

A number of conditions commonly encountered in lizard species require surgical intervention. Surgery of the female reproductive tract is frequently necessary to address problems ranging from preovula-tory follicular stasis to egg-binding or dystocia. Ovariectomy or ovariosalpingectomy is often performed as a preventive measure in captive lizards that are not intended for breeding because of the frequency of reproductive tract disease. Complete removal of all ovarian tissue is paramount, especially when the oviducts are

use with the species in question. For instance, oscillometric blood pressure measurement via cuff on a hindlimb does not work well or correlate with direct arterial pressure measurements in the green iguana.3

In recent years, a number of studies have investigated the effec-tiveness of certain analgesics in lizard species, although most of the information available regarding the use and dosage of the majority of drugs is anecdotal. Morphine has proven to provide analgesia in bearded dragons,33 and clinical impressions suggest that it is effective in other species at similar doses. Butorphanol has been evaluated by different researchers in the green iguana, with different conclusions regarding efficacy. However, in these studies, the observed result could be explained by differences in methodology. Other opioid medications that target the same receptors as morphine should theo-retically be efficacious; however, they have not been evaluated, and dosing would be empirical at best. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications such as meloxicam and ketoprofen are frequently used in lizard species, and some pharmacokinetic data exist to guide usage.7,35

DIAGNOSTICS AND LABORATORY SAMPLE COLLECTIONIt is critical to understand that the most useful diagnostic in any case is a thorough history and physical examination. A careful, systematic physical examination with an understanding of normal anatomy, conformation, and behavior is one of the first steps in proper case management. Appropriate use of light and magnification may aid an examination infinitely, especially in small specimens. In small species with thin skin, transillumination with a cool light may yield tremen-dously useful information.

Imaging using the various available modalities may be useful in the medical management of lizards.32 Radiography is very commonly used, as it is available to most practitioners. The imaging of skeletal structures is fairly straightforward but may be difficult in very small specimens unless high detail systems are available. Lizard species with osteoderms or heavy scales may be difficult to radiograph, as their dermal structures do not allow for proper imaging of internal structures. Identification of soft tissue structures is possible with proper knowledge of normal anatomy. Techniques employing posi-tive and negative contrast media may be useful in certain instances. The application of ultrasonography in the evaluation of lizard cases is becoming increasingly common as appropriate equipment becomes more readily available and clinicians gain confidence with the modal-ity.34 Since lizards may vary so dramatically in size, probes with various footprint sizes and shapes are necessary to accommodate the possible range of species. Small transducer probes capable of emit-ting frequencies in the 10- to 12-megahertz (MHz) range are extremely useful in small species. With very small specimens, a standoff, which may be purchased or simply manufactured by filling a latex glove with water, is extremely useful and allows for more complete imaging of the patient’s anatomy. Coupling of the trans-ducer probe with the sometimes heavily scaled skin of a lizard patient may create challenges. Gel may be effectively employed as a coupling agent, but often this leaves air bubbles under and around the scales creating artifacts that make evaluation difficult. Performing the examination with the lizard’s body submerged in a tub of water may be an effective method of creating adequate transducer cou-pling. Combined with knowledge of the normal anatomy of the species, ultrasonography may be a very effective and useful tool for evaluation of soft tissue structures and facilitate collection of diag-nostic samples via aspiration. Computed tomography (CT) and mag-netic resonance imaging (MRI) are also used occasionally with lizards and may dramatically aid a diagnostic investigation if applied cor-rectly. Many veterinary facilities house CT scanners that are capable to creating useful images, even in very small patients. Software that creates three-dimensional reconstructions of CT images is available. These reconstructions are especially useful, as they allow the clini-cian to visualize the anatomy of the region or structure in question

56 PART II   •  REPTILEGROUPS

TABLE 7-2

Reference Ranges for Hematologic Parameters of Selected Lizard Species

ParametersTegu Lizard

Caimen Lizard

Egyptian Spiny-Tailed Lizard

Frilled Lizard

Mexican Beaded Lizard

Green Iguana

Prehensile-Tailed Skink

Crested Gecko

Gila Monster

Erythrocytes (×106/µL)

0.8 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.4 1.85 ± 2.62 1.4 ± 5.8 1.45 0.50 ± 0.13

PCV (%) 35 ± 7.5 32 ± 5.8 26 ± 6.3 40 ± 8.9 32 ± 5.9 38 ± 52 35 Male 36.2 ± 4.8

Female 30.6 ± 4.6

37 ± 8

Hemoglobin (g/dL)

9.1 ± 0.3 4.6 ± 1.4 9.5 ± 3.7 9.7 ± 1.4 11.7 ± 18.6 9.6 7.4 ± 0.9

MCV (fL) 424.7 ± 156.4

324.2 ± 61.6 519.2 ± 213.6

326.7 ± 182.3

263 812 ± 370

MCH (pg) 184.7 ± 76.7

86.6 ± 11.7 ± 144.1 ± 56.0 69 ±

MCHC (g/dL) 38.6 ± 0 23.4 ± 4.7 34.8 ± 20.0 31.7 ± 4.8 28 20.9 ± 5.3

Leukocytes (×103/µL)

17.7 ± 13.2 10.6 ± 7.2 12.6 ± 7.9 17.9 ± 14.2 5.5 ± 4.5 1.7 ± 15 12.4 15.4 ± 7.1 4.72 ± 0.84

Heterophils (×103/µL)

6.4 ± 3.8 3.6 ± 3.4 9.1 ± 6.8 9.0 ± 7.2 2.0 ± 1.6 5%–55% 4.4 3%–39% 2.17 ± 0.61

Lymphocytes (×103/µL)

9.1 ± 8.0 1.9 ± 1.0 1.9 ± 1.3 6.5 ± 6.4 2.2 ± 2.4 33%–61% 2.7 10.7 ± 5.1 1.54 ± 0.8

Eosinophils (×103/µL)

0.3 ± 0.2 0.8 ± 0.5 0.1 ± 0.0 0.3 ± 0.2 0.3 ± 0.4 0%–1% 0.6 0%–2% 0 ± 0

Monocytes (×103/µL)

1.4 ± 1.1 1.9 ± 2.5 1.8 ± 1.7 0.9 ± 1.0 0.3 ± 0.4 12%–35% 0.1 6%–33% 0.07 ± 0.08

Basophils (×103/µL)

0.6 ± 0.6 3.0 ± 2.1 0.7 ± 1.1 0.4 ± 0.4 0.8 ± 1.1 5%–11% 1.0 0%–12% 0.57 ± 0.23

Values in Mean ± SD (standard deviation), unless otherwise indicated.fL, Femtoliter; g/dL, gram per deciliter; µL, microliter; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; pg, picogram.

removed. If ovarian remnants are left behind, the tissue may regener-ate and ovulation may resume, resulting in peritonitis.

The surgical approach to the coelomic cavity in lizards may be made either on the ventral midline or on the paramedian. Both approaches are appropriate, as long as care is taken to avoid disrup-tion of the ventral abdominal vein. If the ventral abdominal vein is transected, it may be ligated without any apparent ill effect. Incisions should be made between scales, when possible. Skin closure should be made in an everting pattern such as horizontal mattress or skin staples, as the edges of incisions into scaled skin tend to invert. Incisions heal relatively slowly in lizards and reptiles in general, and if no complications occur, sutures may be removed in 4 to 6 weeks.

Amputation of injured or infected limbs or tails is occasionally necessary. If a tail amputation is indicated, it is important to know if the species is capable of autotomy. If so, the skin should be left open if tail regrowth is desired. If the skin is closed, the tail will not regrow. In species that do not have caudal autotomy, the skin should be closed to expedite healing. Lizards may do well with limb amputa-tions, but attention should be paid to avoid leaving a stump that may become traumatized. In most cases, this means amputating at the coxofemoral or scapulohumeral joint.

Abscesses in lizards should be treated as surgical cases, if possible. Complete surgical removal of the abscess and its capsule is necessary, as otherwise it is likely to re-form. In cases in which the abscess cannot be completely resected, it should be debrided as thoroughly as possible and treated topically repeatedly until resolved. Cytology

or histopathology and culture and sensitivity should be performed on the resected capsule of the abscess to identify the causative agent, if possible.

NONINFECTIOUS DISEASESTraumatic injuries from aggressive interactions (including breeding) between conspecifics are fairly commonly. Ideally, social groups are configured and monitored in an effort to avoid serious problems. Wound and fracture care is similar to what would be employed in a mammal, but the fact that healing time will, in most cases, be longer should be kept in mind.

Despite advances in knowledge regarding the captive husbandry and nutrition of lizards, nutritional secondary hyperparathyroidism (NSHP) remains a relatively common diagnosis in captive lizards. Hypovitaminosis A resulting in lesions affecting epithelial tissues is seen with some frequency in lizards and has been linked to the use of beta carotene in lieu of vitamin A in commercial vitamin supple-ments. Obesity is a problem in many captive lizards, especially carnivorous lizards. Overfeeding of high-fat prey items and lack of adequate exercise seems to be at the root of most cases of obesity.

Dystocia is relatively common in lizards and often is the direct result of improper husbandry. All efforts should be made to provide optimal environmental conditions, including an appropriate nesting site, for gravid female lizards. In many species, the female will retain a fully formed clutch of eggs if nesting conditions are not to its liking. Many cases may be managed conservatively and are not true

CHAPTER 7   •  Lacertilia (Lizards, Skinks, Geckos) and Amphisbaenids (Worm Lizards) 57

the disease process. A thorough understanding of organisms that pose a threat to a particular species is paramount in development of an effective preventive medicine and quarantine program.

Bacterial DiseasesMost bacterial infections in lizards are caused by gram-negative bacteria, although gram-positive infections also do occur. When empirically selecting an antibiotic for treatment of an apparent bacte-rial infection in a lizard, it makes sense to choose a drug with an effective gram-negative spectrum, but ideally antibiotic treatment should be based on culture and sensitivity. Many bacterial isolates from sick lizards are usually part of the normal microbial flora but have opportunistically caused disease secondary to trauma, poor hygiene, or possible immunosuppression. Organisms that are com-monly encountered include Pseudomonas sp., Klebsiella sp., Aeromo-nas sp., Proteus sp., and Salmonella sp. Anaerobic bacteria such as Clostridium sp., Bacteroides sp., and Fusobacterium sp. are also encountered with some frequency. In some cases, bacteria that are part of the normal flora of one species, if transmitted to another, may cause disease. For instance, Devriesea agamarum may cause derma-titis and septicemia in Uromastyx sp., but bearded dragons (P. vitti-ceps) seem to be asymptomatic carriers.5 Doses for various antibiotics have been published for lizards,12 and some of the more commonly used medications are presented in Table 7-4. Pharmacokinetic data

emergencies. In some cases where the animal is actively straining, an obvious obstruction exists, or both, emergency salpingotomy with or without salpingectomy may be indicated.

NeoplasiaAs lizards live longer in captivity because of the advances in the understanding of husbandry requirements, neoplastic disease will likely become a more frequent occurrence. Various neoplastic condi-tions affecting all organ systems have been reported in lizard species. The practice of oncology in lizards is the same as it is in other species. Excellent reviews of reptile oncology are presented elsewhere.27

The incidence of certain specific neoplastic conditions in some species is high enough to warrant mention. Bearded dragons appear to be predisposed to developing squamous cell carcinomas, with over 90% of documented cases occurring in proximity to a muco-cutaneous junction in one study.14 In addition, gastric neuroendo-crine carcinomas, peripheral nerve sheet tumors, and myelocytic leukemia appear to occur with some frequency.27

INFECTIOUS DISEASESA wide variety of infectious agents have been found in association with diseases in lizards. It is important to understand that in many of these cases, the conditions of captivity may play a pivotal role in

TABLE 7-3

Reference Ranges for Plasma Biochemical Parameters of Selected Lizard Species

ParameterGreen Iguana

(Iguana iguana)

Prehensile-Tailed Skink

(Corucia zebrata)

Tegu Lizard(Tupinambis teguixin)

Mexican Beaded Lizard(Heloderma horridum)

Crested Gecko (Rhacodactylus ciliatus)

Gila Monster (Heloderma supectum)

T. Protein (g/dL) 5.0 6.5 6.3 ± 1.3 6.8 ± 1.2 Male: 6.0 ± 0.6Female: 6.6 ± 0.8

6.3 ± 0.5

Albumin (g/dL) 1.0–1.6 3.5 ± 0.6 3.6 ± 1.1 Male: 2.7 ± 0.2Female: 2.9 ± 0.3

±

Globulin (g/dL) 2.7 ± 1.2 3.6 ± 1.0 3.5 ± 0.6 ±Calcium (mg/dL) 11.4 13.2 3.0 ± 0.2

(µmol/L)3.5 ± 1.5

(µmol/L)Male: 11.7–14.4Female: 15.6–20.0

12.2 ± 0.8

T. Bilirubin (mg/dL) 0.4–1.0 5 ± 3 (µmol/L) 3 ± 3 (µmol/L) ±Phosphorus (mg/dL) 6.8 3.7 1.8 ± 0.7

(µmol/L)1.7 ± 1.2

(µmol/L)Male: 4.0 ± 0.9Female: 9.6 ± 4.3

3.4 ± 1.8

Sodium (MEq/L) 158 160 ± 5 152 ± 5 134n150 144 ± 3

Potassium ( MEq/L) 3.0 2.6 ± 1.3 4.0 ± 1.1 1.1–6.5 3.9 ± 0.5

Chloride (MEq/L) 117 122 ± 6 115 ± 8 ±Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.1–0.7 27 ± 9 (µmol/L) 35 ± 18 (µmol/L) ±BUN (mg/dL) 6–15 ± ± ±Cholesterol (mg/dl) 246 144 ± ± ±Glucose (mg/dL) 150 100 ± ± 106.6 ± 33.1 48.3 ± 24.2

Uric acid (mg/dL) 1.5 1.6 ± ± 0.8–11.5 16.8 ± 4.2

LDH (IU/L) 635 ± 541 119 ± 98 ±ALP (IU/L) 168 ± 90 57 ± 56 ±Ionized calcium (µmol/L) 1.26 ± 0.10

Creatine kinase (IU/L) 58–3905 600 ± 457

Aspartate aminotransferase (IU/L)

9–127 42 ± 13

Bile acids (µmol/L) <35–89 16.2 ± 13.3

Values in Mean ± SD (standard deviation) unless otherwise indicated.ALP, Alkaline phosphatase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; g/dL, gram per deciliter; IU/L, international unit per liter; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MEq/L, megaequivalent per liter; mg/dL, milligram per deciliter; µmol/L, micromole per liter.

58 PART II   •  REPTILEGROUPS

lizards (Lacerta viridis) is associated with infection with an agent similar to the sea turtle fibropapilloma-associated herpesvirus.22

Infection with a paramyxovirus has been associated with prolif-erative pneumonia and death in caimen lizards (Draecena guianen-sis).19 Evidence of paramyxoviral exposure has been illustrated in both free-ranging lizards and those from a large captive collec-tion.13,23–25 A paramyxovirus isolate that displayed cytopathic effect in cell culture was recovered from the cloaca of an apparently healthy flathead knob-scaled lizard (Xenosaurus platyceps).24

Adenoviruses from the genus Atadenovirus have been recovered from a number of lizard species. Pathology varies and has included hepatitis, enteritis, splenitis, nephritis, pneumonia, and encepha-lopathy.30,36 In bearded dragons, adenoviral infections are well-known causes of morbidity and mortality as a result of hepatic necrosis, especially in juveniles. Typically, affected lizards suffer from concurrent infections with coccidia and nematode parasites.18

Other reports of specific viral infections in lizards occur intermit-tently, and in many cases, the clinical significance of the isolates is unknown. Numerous rhabdoviruses and reoviruses have been sequenced from lizards; however, the behavior of most of these isolates within the lizard host has not been described.26,39 In one case, reovirus infection was associated with mortality in a group of uro-mastyx lizards (Uromastyx hardwickii).10

Parasitic DiseasesInternal and external parasites are frequently encountered in captive lizard patients. Wild-caught animals may almost be guaranteed to harbor at least one parasitic organism. Parasitic infections may be challenging to address, so it is important to understand the behavior of the organism and its potential impact on the host to devise a sensible treatment plan. Table 7-5 lists parasiticides commonly used in lizards.

Fecal flotation, direct microscopic examination, or both are com-monly employed to screen lizards for infections with endoparasites. Collection of an adequate fecal sample for analysis may be difficult, as some lizards do not defecate daily. Many times, in the absence of a fecal sample, clinicians will perform a cloacal or rectal wash and examine the recovered fluid for presence of parasites. In the author’s experience, this is an insensitive screening tool, and negative results should be viewed with caution.

EctoparasitesMites and ticks are commonly seen infesting captive lizards, espe-cially animals recently captured from the wild. The common snake mite (Ophionyssus spp.) may be seen on lizards as well as snakes. Other mite species from the families Trombiculidae and Pterygoso-matidae are also commonly seen parasitizing lizards. Both hard (ixodid) and soft (argasid) ticks may infest lizards. Acariform

are sorely lacking for most drugs with regard to lizard species, so the clinician is encouraged to be appropriately cautious when imple-menting treatments.

Fungal DiseasesInfection with various saprophytic fungi occurs occasionally in captive lizards and is often thought to be associated with poor hygiene, immunosuppression, or both. In contrast, infection with the Chrysosporium anamorph of Nannizziopsis vriesii (CANV) has been reported to infect a variety of reptile species, including a number of species of lizards, and has been shown to be a primary pathogen in veiled chameleons (Chamaeleo calyptratus). Infection with CANV may result in severe and frequently fatal dermatitis. Diagnosis may be made with fungal culture or histopathology, and successful treatment has been described in lizard species.15

Viral DiseasesMore and more viral pathogens are being identified in lizards as diag-nostics become cheaper and more readily available. Herpesviruses have been found associated with stomatitis in plated lizards (Gerrho-saurus sp.) and green tree monitors (Varanus prasinus).37,38 In green tree monitors, the stomatitis is proliferative in nature and may lead to the development of squamous cell carcinoma. Another varanid her-pesvirus that was associated with hepatitis and enteritis in an uniden-tified varanid species has been identified.17 Papillomatosis in green

TABLE 7-4

Antimicrobial Agents Recommended for Lizards

Generic Name Dosage (mg/kg)

Route of Administration Interval (hr)

Amikacin 5 (LD) then 2.5 IM 72

Ampicillin 5–10 IM, SC 24

Ceftazidime 20 IM 24–48

Enrofloxacin 5–10 IM, SC, PO 24–48

Metronidazole 25–50 PO 24–48

Piperacillin 100–200 IM 24–48

Trimethoprim/sulfadiazine

15–30 IM, SC, PO 24–48

Itraconazole 5 PO 24

Voriconazole 10 PO 24

IM, Intramuscular; PO, oral; SC, subcutaneous; LD, loading dose.

TABLE 7-5

Parasiticides Recommended for Lizards

Generic Name Dosage (mg/kg) Route of Administration Comments

Albendazole 50 PO Nematodes, trematodes, cestodes

Fenbendazole 50–10025–50

PO q14dPO q24 hr × 3–5 days

Nematodes, flagellates, giardia

Ivermectin 0.2–0.4 PO, SC q14d Nematodes, ectoparasites

Metronidazole 50–100 PO q14d Protozoa

Oxfendazole 66 PO q14-28 days Nematodes

Praziquantel 8–10 IM, PO Cestodes, trematodes

Sulfadimethoxine 50 PO q24 hr × 3 days, then EOD Coccidia

Toltrazuril 5–15 PO q24 hr × 3 days Coccidia

EOD, Every other day; IM, intramuscular; PO, oral; SC, subcutaneous.

CHAPTER 7   •  Lacertilia (Lizards, Skinks, Geckos) and Amphisbaenids (Worm Lizards) 59

that are not intended for breeding should be seriously considered to avoid reproductive tract disease as the animal ages. No routine vac-cinations are recommended; however, screening and treatment for endoparasites should be performed at regular intervals. Necropsy of all collection animals that die is paramount for understanding the effectiveness of the husbandry and consequently the general health of the collection.

REFERENCES1. Bennett RA, Schumacher JP, Hedjazi-Haring K, et al: Cardiopulmonary

and anesthetic effects of propofol administered intraosseously to green iguanas. J Am Vet Med Assoc 212:93–98, 1998.

2. Bertelsen MF, Sauer CD: Alfaxalone anaesthesia in the green iguana (Iguana iguana). Vet Anaesth Analg 38:461–466, 2011.

3. Chinnadurai SK, De Voe RS, Koenig A, et al: Comparison of an implant-able telemetry device and an oscillometric monitor for measurement of blood pressure in anaesthetized and unrestrained green iguanas (Iguana iguana). Vet Anaesth Analg 37:434–439, 2010.

4. Chinnadurai SK, De Voe RS: Selected infectious diseases of reptiles. Vet Clin Exot Anim 12:583–596, 2009.

5. Devloo R, Martel A, Hellebuyck T, et al: Bearded dragons (Pogona vitti-ceps) asymptomatically infected with Devriesea agamarum are a source of persistent clinical infection in captive colonies of dab lizards (Uromastyx sp.). Vet Micro 150:297–301, 2011.

6. Diaz-Figueroa O, Mitchell MA: Gastrointestinal anatomy and physiology. In Mader DR, editor: Reptile medicine and surgery, ed 2, St. Louis, MO, 2006, Elsevier, pp 145–162.

7. Divers SJ, Papich M, McBride M, et al: Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam following intravenous and oral administration in green iguanas (Iguana iguana). Am J Vet Res 71(11):1277–1283, 2010.

8. Divers SJ: Reptile diagnostic endoscopy and endosurgery. Vet Clin Exot Anim 13:217–242, 2010.

9. Donoghue S: Nutrition. In Mader DR, editor: Reptile medicine and surgery, ed 2, St. Louis, MO, 2006, Elsevier, pp 251–298.

10. Drury SEN, Gough RE, Welchman D: Isolation and identification of a reovirus from a lizard, Uromastyx hardwickii, in the United Kingdom. Vet Rec 151(21):637–638, 2002.

11. Fry BG, Wroe S, Teeuwisse W, et al: A central role for venom in predation by Varanus komodoensis (Komodo Dragon) and the extinct giant Varanus (Megalania) priscus. Proc Nat Acad Sci United States 106(22):8969–8974, 2009.

12. Gibbons PM, Klaphake E, Carpenter JW: Reptiles. In Carpenter JW, editor: Exotic animal forumulary, ed 4, St. Louis, MO, 2013, Elsevier, pp 83–182.

13. Gravendyck M, Ammermann P, Marschang RE, Kaleta EF: Paramyxoviral and reoviral infections of iguanas on Honduran islands. J Wildl Dis 34:33–38, 1998.

14. Hannon DE, Garner MM, Reavill DR: Squamous cell carcinomas in inland bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps). J Herp Med Surg 21(4):101–106, 2011.

15. Hellebuyck T, Baert K, Pasmans F, et al: Cutaneous hyalohyphomycosis in a girdled lizard (Cordylus giganteus) caused by the Chrysosporium ana-morph of Nannizziopsis vriesii and successful treatment with voricon-azole. Vet Dermatol 21:429–433, 2010.

16. Holz P: Renal anatomy and physiology. In Mader DR, editor: Reptile medicine and surgery, ed 2, St. Louis, MO, 2006, Elsevier, pp 135–144.

17. Hughes-Hanks JM, Schommer SK, Mitchell WJ, Shaw DP: Hepatitis and enteritis caused by a novel herpesvirus in two monitor lizards (Varanus spp.). J Vet Diag Invest 22:295–299, 2010.

18. Hyndman T, Shilton CM: Molecular detection of two adenoviruses associated with disease in Australian lizards. Aust Vet J 89(6):232–235, 2011.

19. Jacobson ER, Origgi F, Pessier AP, et al: Paramyxovirus infection in caiman lizards (Draecena guianensis). J Vet Diag Invest 31:143–151, 2001.

20. Jacobson ER: Overview of reptile biology, anatomy and histology. In Jacobson ER, editor: Infectious diseases and pathology of reptiles, Boca Raton, FL, 2007, CRC Press, pp 1–130.

parasites have the potential to transmit bloodborne pathogens, although this has not been well documented to this point in lizards. Typically, the pathology associated with acariasis in lizards is limited to dermatitis, which may be severe, and potentially anemia.4

EndoparasitesMetazoan parasites are commonly encountered in lizard species. Oxyurids are frequently encountered in commonly kept species such as green iguanas (Iguana iguana) and bearded dragons (P. vitticeps) and rarely cause clinical disease. Ascarids from the genus Hexametra as well as others are known to infect the stomach and the intestinal tract of various lizard species. Rhabdias and Strongyloides spp. are known to infect lizards and may cause pathology in the respiratory tract and the intestinal tract, respectively. Filarid nematodes are com-monly seen in wild-collected animals and may encyst in the subcutis or body cavities and cause pathology locally. Filarids in the genus Folyella are most commonly encountered in certain agamids and chameleons. Pentastomids in the genus Raillietiella have been associ-ated with disease in lizards.21 Generally, most host-adapted metazoan parasites are tolerated reasonably well by lizards unless parasite numbers become too high or the host becomes compromised for other reasons.

Protozoan parasites are extremely common in captive lizards. Carriage of Isospora, Eimeria, or both species is common and typi-cally not associated with significant disease. An exception is I. amphiboluri, which is an important pathogen of captive bearded dragons. This coccidian has been associated with significant morbid-ity and mortality in young animals. Co-infections of bearded dragons with I. amphiboluri, adenovirus, and dependovirus have been reported as well. Cryptosporidiosis is an extremely important disease in captive lizards and has historically caused significant losses in many lizard collections. Cryptosporidium saurophilum has been rec-ognized as the causative agent of cryptosporidiosis in lizards and appears to have a predilection for the intestinal tract.40 However, gastric cryptosporidiosis similar to what is observed in snakes is occasionally seen in lizard species.21 It is very likely that many addi-tional Cryptosporidium species are capable of causing disease in rep-tiles. Molecular diagnostics are available for the detection of Cryptosporidium in biologic samples. Oocysts may also be detected on a fecal float or direct microscopic examination by a skilled indi-vidual. Acid-fast stains and others such as auramine stain may high-light cryptosporidial organisms and aid in microscopic identification. Amebiasis is another important protozoal disease of lizards. Organ-isms in the genus Entamoeba are the causative agents of amebiasis, E. invadans being the most frequently implicated. Severe, hemor-rhagic enteritis and systemic spread of infection with abscessation of various organs are possible with clinical amoebiasis.21 Outbreaks of amebiasis may be explosive in susceptible collections. Treatment with appropriate medications is possible but needs to be instituted early in the course of the disease to be effective.

Microsporidium infections are also documented as a relatively common cause of disease in bearded dragons. The organism infects multiple organs, including the brain, liver, lungs, and GI tract and results in variable and nonspecific clinical signs.21

PREVENTIVE MEDICINEA quarantine program is strongly recommended for all lizard collec-tions to avoid the introduction of disease into the established popula-tion, if at all possible. Quarantine programs should ideally be based on the species and the history of the collection. All appropriate diagnostic screening for infectious disease should be conducted prior to introduction of any new animal to the established collection. Under no circumstances should a sick animal be introduced to the collection. Routine physical examinations and review of husbandry parameters are recommended on a regular basis. Collection of blood for a complete blood cell count (CBC) and chemistry panel when the animal is in good health is desirable for future comparison should the animal become ill. Surgical sterilization of female lizards

21. Jacobson ER: Parasites and parasitic diseases of reptiles. In Jacobson ER, editor: Infectious diseases and pathology of reptiles, Boca Raton, FL, 2007, CRC Press, pp 571–666.

22. Literak I, Robesova B, Majlathova V, et al: Herpesvirus-associated papil-lomatosis in a green lizard. J Wildl Dis 46(1):257–261, 2010.

23. Lloyd C, Manvell R, Drury S, Sainsbury AW: Seroprevalence and signifi-cance of paramyxovirus titres in a zoological collection of lizards. Vet Rec 156:578–580, 2005.

24. Marschang RE, Donahoe S, Manvell R, Lemos-Espinal J: Paramyxovirus and reovirus infections in wild caught Mexican lizards (Xenosaurus and Ambronia spp.). J Zoo Wildl Med 33:317–321, 2002.

25. Marschang RE, Papp T, Frost JW: Comparison of paramyxovirus isolates from snakes, lizards and a tortoise. Virus Res 144:272–279, 2009.

26. Marschang RE, Papp T: Isolation and partial characterization of three reoviruses from lizards. J Herp Med Surg 19(1):13–15, 2009.

27. Mauldin GN, Done LB: Oncology. In Mader DR, editor: Reptile medicine and surgery, ed 2, St. Louis, MO, 2006, Elsevier, pp 299–322.

28. Mayer J, Knoll J, Wrubel KM, Mitchell MA: Characterizing the hemato-logic and plasma chemistry profiles of captive crested geckos (Rhacodac-tylus ciliatus). J Herp Med Surg 21(2–3):68–75, 2011.

29. Nardini G, Leopardi S, Bielli M: Clinical hematology in reptilian species. Vet Clin Exot Anim 16:1–30, 2013.

30. Papp T, Fledelius B, Schmidt V, et al: PCR-sequence characterization of new adenoviruses found in reptiles and the first successful isolation of a lizard adenovirus. Vet Micro 134:233–240, 2008.

31. Scheelings TF, Baker RT, Hammersley G, et al: A preliminary investiga-tion into the chemical restraint with alfaxalone of selected Australian squamate species. J Herp Med Surg 2–3:63–67, 2011.

32. Silverman S: Diagnostic imaging. In Mader DR, editor: Reptile medicine and surgery, ed 2, St. Louis, MO, 2006, Elsevier, pp 471–489.

33. Sladky KK, Kinney ME, Johnson SM: Analgesic efficacy of butorphanol and morphine in bearded dragons and corn snakes. J Am Vet Med Assoc 233(2):267–273, 2008.

34. Stetter MD: Ultrasonography. In Mader DR, editor: Reptile medicine and surgery, ed 2, St. Louis, MO, 2006, Elsevier, pp 665–674.

35. Tuttle AD, Papich M, Lewbart GA, et al: Pharmacokinetics of ketoprofen in the green iguana (Iguana iguana) following single intravenous and intramuscular injections. J Zoo Wildl Med 37(4):567–570, 2006.

36. Wellehan JFX, Johnson AJ, Harrach B, et al: Detection and analysis of six lizard adenoviruses by consensus primer PCR provides further evi-dence of a reptilian origin for the Atadenoviruses. J of Virol 78(23):13366–13369, 2004.

37. Wellehan JFX, Johnson AJ, Latimer KS, et al: Varanid herpesvirus 1: A novel herpesvirus associated with proliferative stomatitis in green tree monitors (Varanus prasinus). Vet Micro 105:83–92, 2004.

38. Wellehan JFX, Nichols DK, Li L, Kapur V: Three novel herpesviruses associated with stomatitis in Sudan plated lizards (Gerrhosaurus major) and a black-lined plated lizard (Gerrhosaurus nigrolineatus). J Zoo Wildl Med 35(1):50–54, 2004.

39. Wellehan JFX, Pessier AP, Archer LL, et al: Initial sequence characteriza-tion of the rhabdoviruses of squamate reptiles, including a novel rhab-dovirus from a caiman lizard (Dracaena guianensis). Vet Micro 158:274–279, 2012.

40. Xiao L, Ryan UM, Graczyk TK, et al: Genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium spp. in captive reptiles. Appl Environment Microbiol 70(2):891–899, 2004.