Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

  • Upload
    gmsweb

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    1/14

    M R . R O B E R T A N D E R S O N

    A N D

    M R . A N T H O N Y B A Y L E Y

    INITIAL ASSESSMENT OF ROAD

    TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE ANDTRANSPORT SERVICES IN GMS

  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    2/14

  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    3/14

    Road Corridors Operating Conditions

    Location Asset Management Status

    CAMBODIA Core issues include lack of road maintenance and truck overloading.

    Periodic maintenance using private sector contractors for pavement

    overlays moving forward.

    LAO PDR Many road sections and bridges pose reliability risks due to shortfall in

    funding of routine and periodic maintenance. The Road Fund concepthas taken hold and showing signs of success.

    MYANMAR General lack of road and bridge maintenance along most major road

    corridors. Lack of bridge capacity at numerous large river crossings.

    Inadequate road geometry on many corridors.

    PRC Major corridors served by existing and planned expressways. Road

    corridors generally in good operating condition and adequatelymaintained, although roads in Yunnan funded at 70% of required level.

    THAILAND Best developed and maintained road network in GMS. Major corridor

    roads are high speed 4-lane and 6-lane highways. Controlled access

    expressway network development has not been developed.

    VIET NAM National roads absorb disproportional amount of maintenance budget

    funding; little remains for secondary roads. Traffic safety and coastalflooding of highways are also core problem areas.

  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    4/14

    Transport Corridor Network

    Corridor Termini (Countries served) Importance to GMS Trade

    North-South Connectivity (5 corridors)

    North-South Kunming, Bangkok

    (PRC, MYA, LAO, THA)

    GMS trade facilitation backbone corridor in north-

    south direction

    Eastern Kunming, Nanning, Hanoi, Haiphong/

    HCMC (PRC, VIE)

    GMS trade facilitation section important between

    Kunming and Haiphong and in vicinity of HCMC

    Central Kunming ,Vientiane, Sihanoukville

    Laem Chabang

    (PRC, LAO, CAM, THA)

    Important GMS trade section is Vientiane to

    Bangkok/Laem Chabang, and from Phnom Penh

    to Sihanoukville

    Western Tamu, Mawlamyine

    (MYA; a link to N-S Corridor in THA)

    Will become important for GMS trade particularly

    road sections serving Yangon city and portNorth-

    eastern

    Thanh Hoa, Bangkok, Laem Chabang

    (VIE, LAO, THA)

    Somewhat ill-conceived corridor. Not likely to

    facilitate much GMS trade in near or long term

    East-West Connectivity (4 corridors)

    Northern Nanning, Kunming, Tamu

    (PRC,MYA)

    Well-conceived corridor for regional cooperation /

    connectivity, but not likely to facilitate much GMS

    trade.

    East-

    West

    Mawlamyine, Dong Ha, with Da Nang link

    (MYA,THA,LAO,VIE)

    Well-conceived corridor for regional cooperation/

    connectivity, but limited as a driver of GMS trade.

    Southern Dawei, Bangkok, Phnom Penh, Quy

    Nonh/ HCMC, Vung Tau (MYA,CAM,VIE)

    GMS trade facilitation backbone corridor in east-

    west direction (following central subcorridor only)

    Southern

    Coastal

    Bangkok, Laem Chabang, Sihanouk-ville,

    Nam Can (THA, CAM, VIE)

    Minor corridor for GMS trade facilitation, except

    near vicinity of port of Laem Chabang and to

    lesser extend near port city of Sihanoukville.

  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    5/14

    Primary Trade Routes: Constraints and Gaps -1

    Identified Trade Route Bottlenecks and Gaps

    Trade Route 1: North-South Corridorvia Lao PRD, near Bangkok/Laem

    Chabang and south extension of

    corridor at Malaysian border

    Bottleneck along the southern extension of North-

    South Corridor, between Hat Yai and Sadao at

    Thai-Malaysian border.

    Trade Route 2: Southern Corridorbetween Bangkok and Ho Chi Minh

    City via AH1, on Thai and Vietnamese

    sections

    Bottlenecks at

    Aranyaprathet-Poipet Border Crossing along

    Southern Corridor

    Phnom Penh at the convergence of the Southern

    and Central Corridors, and the Mekong River

    Trade Route 3: Thailand section ofCentral Corridor between

    Bangkok/Laem Chabang and Vientiane

    via AH2

    Bottleneck along congested Highways 3 and 7

    near Laem Chabang Port; and

    Potential bottleneck at Luang Prabang where the

    Central and Northeast Corridors and the Mekong

    River all converge

    Trade Route 4: Yangon-Mandalayroute (AH1), incorporating the Payagi -

    Meiktila section of Western Corridor

    No major bottlenecks or gaps initially identified

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docx
  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    6/14

    Primary Trade Routes: Constraints and Gaps - 2

    Identified Trade Route Bottlenecks and Gaps

    Trade Route 5: Bangkok to Payagi viaMae Sot-Myawaddy combining North

    South and Western Corridors

    Gap along East-West Corridor and Western

    Corridor requiring upgrading of the Kawkareik to

    Thaton and Thaton to Payagyi Roads

    Bottleneck at the Mae Sot-Myawaddy Border

    Crossing

    Possible bottlenecks in access roads to YangonPort

    Trade Route 6: Northern Corridorbetween Kunming and Nanning

    No major bottlenecks or gaps initially identified

    Trade Route 7: Eastern Corridorbetween Kunming and Haiphong via

    AH14

    No major bottlenecks or gaps initially identified

    Trade Route 8: Central Corridorbetween Phnom Penh and

    Sihanoukville via AH11

    Bottleneck at Phnom Penh at the convergence of

    the Southern and Central Corridors, and the

    Mekong River (also identified under Trade Route 2)

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/current/tmp/draft_final%204%20May%202012(rev1).docx
  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    7/14

    Assessment of Transport Services

    in GMS Trade

  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    8/14

    Role of Freight Transport

    Efficient transfer on cargo between point of despatchand point of delivery, either domestically orinternationally

    Transport is a demand responder not a traffic creator

    but can have indirect impact on demand based onefficiency

    Modal competition is based on service standardswhich are in turn based on cost/time/reliability

    (C/T/R) parameters Competition is mainly within modes rather than

    between modes

  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    9/14

    GMS Airfreight

    Growing but volumes small

    Only minimal intra-GMS traffic

    Demand concentrated mainly inThailand and Vietnam

    Good international connectivity

  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    10/14

    GMS Maritime Transport

    Maritime transport not linear thus making tradingwith distant markets as attractive as closer markets

    Carries 90% GMS overall trade by weight with

    volumes dominated by bulk shipments of oil and oilproducts, coal, cement, steel and rice

    Carries 75% of intra-GMS trade by weight due bulkshipments, lower transport costs and dominance of

    demand along seaboards Major growth in size and reliability of container

    services and ports (Laem Chabang and Saigon Port)

  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    11/14

    GMS Road Transport

    Dominance of small entities with low performancelevels in many countries with shortage of largemodern transport fleets, except in Thailand and tolesser extent in Vietnam

    High cost due to traffic imbalances and choke points

    Lack of through transport is constraint but majorproblem is limited demand for international services

    and slow improvements in trade facilitation

  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    12/14

    GMS other transport modes

    Rail Not a major freight carrier due to limited

    international connectivity

    Not yet competitive in C/T/R terms Inland Waterways

    Important in movement of aggregates, rawmaterials and rice in Vietnam, Cambodia

    and Myanmar but limited application inother countries Problem of seasonal water levels

  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    13/14

    Implications of assessment on GMS corridordevelopment concept

    Busiest trade freight sections of GMS corridors tend to be closeto the ports

    Maritime transport is and will continue to be dominant even forintra-GMS trade

    Dominant role of road transport is feeding traffic to and fromports, rather than through land borders

    Importance of connectivity between port and corridors linked toindustrial/manufacturing, agro-industrial centers

    Consideration of concept of ports as gateways and corridors aslinks along supply chains and concentrations of demand

  • 7/31/2019 Fourth GMS Economic Corridors Forum (ECF-4): 5.c Session1-Initial Assessment of Road Transport Infra; Transport Services in GMS

    14/14

    Thank you