26
1 Four Thinkers on Business and Society Lloyd Kurtz November 6, 2006

Four Thinkers on Business and Society

  • Upload
    siusan

  • View
    14

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Four Thinkers on Business and Society. Lloyd Kurtz November 6, 2006. Topics. John Wesley – Christian Ethics Adam Smith – ‘Das Adam Smith Problem’ Albert Hirschman – The Playbook Brad Barber – The CalPERS Effect. John Wesley – Christian Ethics. Christian Premises. The world is corrupt. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

1

Four Thinkers onBusiness and Society

Lloyd Kurtz

November 6, 2006

Page 2: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

2

Topics

John Wesley – Christian Ethics Adam Smith – ‘Das Adam Smith Problem’ Albert Hirschman – The Playbook Brad Barber – The CalPERS Effect

Page 3: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

3

John Wesley – Christian Ethics

Page 4: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

4

Christian Premises

The world is corrupt. “Enemy-occupied territory – that’s what the world

is.” - C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity

We act of our own free will. “By their deeds you shall know them.” – Matthew

7:16

Money is important.

Page 5: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

5

Money is Important

“In the New Testament, Jesus had more to say about money matters than any other single subject, be it worship, sexual behavior, violence and peace, or even eternal life. From his parables (the rich fool, the rich man and Lazarus) and his encounters with people (Zacchaeus, the rich ruler), a basic assumption emerges: for those who would follow Jesus, economic questions are really spiritual questions.”

- Burkholder (2002)

Page 6: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

6

John Wesley

For, let the world be as corrupt as it will, is gold or silver to blame? "The love of money," we know, "is the root of all evil;" but not the thing itself. The fault does not lie in the money, but in them that use it. It may be used ill: and what may not? But it may likewise be used well…

Page 7: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

7

‘The Use of Money’

I. We ought to gain all we can gain but this it is certain we ought not to do; we ought not to gain money at the expense of life, nor at the expense of our health.

II. Do not throw the precious talent into the sea.

III. Having, First, gained all you can, and, Secondly saved all you can, Then "give all you can."

Page 8: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

8

Get All You Can, BUT…

“I. We ought to gain all we can gain but this it is certain we ought not to do; we ought not to gain money at the expense of life, nor at the expense of our health.”

Gain all you can, but don’t: Harm your own health. Harm your mental health. Hurt your neighbor in his body. Hurt your neighbor in his substance.

Page 9: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

9

Specific Prohibitions

Physically harmful occupations. Smuggling. Tax evasion. Businesses that require cheating or lying. Unethical medical professionals. Purveyors of alcohol.

“They murder His Majesty's subjects by wholesale, neither does their eye pity or spare. They drive them to hell like sheep.”

Pax World controversy

Page 10: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

10

And Then, Learn.

“Gain all you can, by common sense, by using in your business all the understanding which God has given you…

“You should be continually learning, from the experience of others, or from your own experience, reading, and reflection, to do everything you have to do better to-day than you did yesterday. And see that you practise whatever you learn, that you may make the best of all that is in your hands.”

Page 11: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

11

Adam Smith – ‘Das Adam Smith Problem’

Page 12: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

12

‘Das Adam Smith Problem’

“At the age of fourteen, Smith was sent to the University of Glasgow [where he] first confronted the great issues which were to drive Scottish moral philosophy in the eighteenth century.

“The first of those issues was how to reconcile classical and Christian demands for altruism and benevolence in human relations with recent arguments by Thomas Hobbes and Bernard Mandeville that egoism and self-interest were the driving force in society, and how to do so without resorting to the disputed authority of revelation.”

- Muller (1993)

Page 13: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

13

Adam Smith #1 – Empirical Ethics“[In Smith’s ethical system] our desire for the sympathy of others leads by steps to the restraint of our self-love…

“Our natural egoism is partially restrained by our awareness of an external standard, the standard we would use to judge our actions if we were a spectator who was biased neither toward ourselves nor toward those affected by our actions.”

- Muller (1993)

Page 14: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

14

Adam Smith #2 – The Invisible Hand“[E]very individual necessarily labours to render the annual revenue of the society as great as he can. He generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it…he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention. Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was no part of it. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it.”

Page 15: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

15

Lydenberg’s Modest Proposal

The goal: Harness market forces to encourage better corporate behavior.

“How do you direct corporations to the public interest? We need new vocabulary to do that, new data. And I think [socially responsible investment] can bring great value to that. We can bring fresh perspectives to risk, intangible assets, and wealth creation.”

Page 16: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

16

Steven Lydenberg’s To-Do List Build consensus that better corporate

behavior is desirable. Create data sources so people can be better-

informed about corporate social responsibility.

Build institutions that will make society more sophisticated about corporate social responsibility.

Engage market forces to encourage better corporate behavior.

Page 17: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

17

Albert Hirschman – The Playbook

Page 18: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

18

Two Problems

An organization is engaged in behavior we don’t like. What should we do?

When should we use economic reasoning, and when should we use ethical reasoning?

Page 19: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

19

Option 1 - Exit Classical economic response Abandons opportunity for change Only option when voice is impossible

Biggest risk: reinvestment

Page 20: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

20

Option #2 - Voice

‘Political’ response Requires investment of time, energy, money Only option when exit is impossible.

Biggest risk: entrapment

Page 21: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

21

Loyalty

A rational judgment to try voice instead of exit.

Loyalty is based on… The likelihood of positive change The quality of alternatives

Page 22: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

22

Brad Barber – The CalPERS Effect

Page 23: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

23

Constructing the CalPERS Focus List Quantitative Screen

Stock Performance Capital Efficiency Corporate Governance

Qualitative Review Overall financial performance Valuation Strategic plans Management and board member relations Compensation Practices Other miscellaneous shareowner issues (including takeover defense)

Engagement Process “CalPERS considers the engagement process to be a crucial component of

the overall Focus List Process. CalPERS makes a persistent effort to meet with the management and directors to discuss performance and governance issues. CalPERS will focus on reforming the company's governance practices with an emphasis on accountability, transparency, independence, and discipline.”

Source: CalPERS

Page 24: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

24

Short-Term Impact

Barber finds a “small, but reliably positive” +0.25% effect on announcement date.

“My best estimate, based on conservative short-term market reactions, indicates CalPERS activism has resulted in total wealth creation of $3.1 billion between 1992 and 2005.”

Page 25: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

25

Long-Term Impact

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 Day 2 Weeks 1 Month 6 Months 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years

$ B

illio

ns

Source: Barber (2006)

Page 26: Four Thinkers on Business and Society

26

NotesBarber, Brad. “Monitoring the Monitor: Evaluating CalPERS’ Shareholder Activism.” Working Paper, University of California, Davis, March 2006.

Burkholder, J.R. “Biblical Faith and Investment: Toward a Theology for ‘Making Money.’” Mennonite Mutual Aid, 2002.

Hirschman, Albert O. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1970.

Lydenberg, Steven. Corporations and the Public Interest: Guiding the Invisible Hand. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2005.

Muller, Jerry Z. Adam Smith in His Time and Ours. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.

Smith, Adam. The Wealth of Nations. Modern Library edition. New York: Random House, 1994.

Wesley, John. “The Uses of Money.” Edited by Jennette Descalzo, student at Northwest Nazarene College (Nampa, ID), with corrections by George Lyons for the Wesley Center for Applied Theology. General Board of Global Ministries, The United Methodist Church, 2000.