7
Anders Blok ([email protected]) Associate Professor, Department of Sociology University of Copenhagen, Denmark CIDEA Closing Conference, ‘New Directions in Climate Change Governance’, Copenhagen, October 20-21 2014 Formatting the citizen? Moving between familiar, planned, and public engagements in the green city

Formatting the citizen? Moving between familiar, planned, and public engagements in the green city

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Formatting the citizen? Moving between familiar, planned, and public engagements in the green city. Anders Blok ([email protected]) Associate Professor, Department of Sociology University of Copenhagen, Denmark. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Formatting the citizen? Moving between familiar, planned, and public engagements in the green city

Anders Blok ([email protected])

Associate Professor, Department of Sociology

University of Copenhagen, Denmark

CIDEA Closing Conference, ‘New Directions in Climate Change Governance’, Copenhagen, October 20-21 2014

Formatting the citizen?

Moving between familiar, planned, and public engagements in the green city

Page 2: Formatting the citizen? Moving between familiar, planned, and public engagements in the green city

Empirical study: ‘incidental’ citizen activism around the making of Nordhavnen (Copenhagen) into a ‘sustainable’ city district

CIDEA Closing Conference, ‘New Directions in Climate Change Governance’, Copenhagen, October 20-21 2014

Source: COBE, Sleth, Polyform & Rambøll

Page 3: Formatting the citizen? Moving between familiar, planned, and public engagements in the green city

• Engagement in planning – the citizen as legitimate ‘stakeholder’ with ‘interests’

• Grammar of the liberal public: ‘stakes’ can be made explicit, compared, aggregated etc.

• Justified engagement – the citizen as co-arbiter of the urban ‘common good’

• Grammar of public justification for the common good (market, industrial, civic, green etc.)

• Familiar engagement – the citizen as co-implicated via ‘embodied habituation’ in the site

• Grammar of attachment to common-places, based on shared sense of care and concern

Theoretical framework: ‘regimes of urban engagement’ (Thévenot)

CIDEA Closing Conference, ‘New Directions in Climate Change Governance’, Copenhagen, October 20-21 2014

Page 4: Formatting the citizen? Moving between familiar, planned, and public engagements in the green city

Planned engagements: formatting the citizen as ‘stakeholder’

CIDEA Closing Conference, ‘New Directions in Climate Change Governance’, Copenhagen, October 20-21 2014

Citizens’ workshop, April 2008, on the future of Nordhavnen (source: By & Havn)

“I hope they will prioritize leisure activities and green spaces” (citizens’ comment, quoted on nordhavnen.dk)

Page 5: Formatting the citizen? Moving between familiar, planned, and public engagements in the green city

Urban green attachments – activists moving between familiar and public engagements in the green city

Source: “Dreams of life in Nordhavn: a visual hearing response”, The Harbor Committee of Østerbro (made available via personal contact)

CIDEA Closing Conference, ‘New Directions in Climate Change Governance’, Copenhagen, October 20-21 2014

Source: http://stubbenblog.wordpress.com/

Page 6: Formatting the citizen? Moving between familiar, planned, and public engagements in the green city

Citizen mobilization ‘from above’? A familiar view of planning encroachments (windmills; container terminal)

CIDEA Closing Conference, ‘New Directions in Climate Change Governance’, Copenhagen, October 20-21 2014

Source: Hearing response, FOGUS (available on-line: http://www.ft.dk/)

Page 7: Formatting the citizen? Moving between familiar, planned, and public engagements in the green city

Concluding remarks: formatting the green (urban) citizen differently?

• Urban planning dominated by practices of formatting citizens as ‘stakeholders’

• Citizen hearings, workshops etc. elicit ‘opinions’ and ‘interests’ in pre-formatted ‘stakes’ – tend to de-encourage citizen engagements based on formats of familiarity and/or justification

• Urban ‘sustainability’ is ‘compromised’ territory – struggles against planning technocracy

• The inevitable moral compromises of ‘sustainability’ (market, civic, green) tend to be unavailable for public inspection, justification and critique (challenge of ‘urban-green technocracy’)

• Towards urban learning forums more hospitable to ‘familiar’ urban-green attachments?

• Citizen concern and care for urban-green issues (incl. ‘climate’) often inseparable from embodied place-based practices – how to facilitate more inclusive forms of shared urban-green learning?

CIDEA Closing Conference, ‘New Directions in Climate Change Governance’, Copenhagen, October 20-21 2014