Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
地 学雑 誌
Joumal of Geography
104 (3) 392-407 1995
Formation of Backarc Basin and Genesis of Ophilolite
Hajimu KINOSHITA*, Yukari NAKASA*, Rie MORIJIRI** and Toshiya FUJIWARA***
Abstract
Geoscientific informations from the Japan Sea, a backarc basin between Japan and Siberian
continental mass, and from a part of the ophiolite belt along the southern rim of Japan,
Mineoka ophiolite belt, are presented to discuss a possible relation between the opening of the
Japan Sea and the formation of the ophiolite belt. It is speculated that the Central Japan
ophiolite belt was formed by slicing of the lithosphere and uplift of serpentinized mantle peridotite
in Miocene. Slicing of the lithosphere was induced by opening of the Shikoku Basin (northern
part of the Philippine Sea Plate) shortly after the opening of the Japan Sea.
I. Introduction
The northwestern Pacific is characterized by
a presence of number of backarc basins along
the Eurasian continental margin. One of the
most intensively studied basins is the Japan
Sea between Japan and the Eurasia. Elucida-
tion of the origin and evolution of the Japan
Sea is an interesting scientific subject. The
opening of the Japan Sea and the occurrences
of a small but conspicuous ophiolite belt in the
Central Japan is believed to be connected with
each other not only on their geologic time scale
but tectonic environments of this region (e. g.,
Arai and Okada, 1991).
Tectonic evolution of the Japan Sea (Fig. 1)
has been attracting attention of scholars of earth
sciences. The formation scheme of the Japan
Sea was discussed first by Terada (1934) who
noticed from the bathymetry feature of the
Japan Sea that the basin was formed behind
the drifting Japanese landmass off the Eurasian
continent by rifting of the continental crust, the
Siberian landmass, and leaving banks and highs
as remnant continental fragments behind Japa-
nese landmass (Terada, 1934). Since then, the
Japan Sea and its surrounding area, Japan,
Korea and Primorie of Russia, have been
objectives of extensive geoscientific studies.
W ell organized introductions on these subjects
were made recently by Ocean Drilling Program
research groups (Tamaki et al., 1990, 1992).
The magnetic anomaly patterns of this area
were studied earlier by Murauchi (1972), and
Isezaki (1986). Intensive and thorough map-
ping surveys in the eastern part of the Japan
Sea by Geological Survey of Japan were made
for years (e.g., Tamaki, 1986). These data
were incorporated with Russian researches to
build a new magnetic anomaly map by Izezaki
(1986). Kono (1986) has re-examined the mag-
netic lineation patterns for deducing formation
age of the Japan Sea. Later, Seama and Ise-
zaki (1990), and recently Nakasa and Kinoshita
*Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo. Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan.**Geological
Survey of Japan. Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan.***Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo. Minamidai,Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164, Japan.
392
(1994) have reported weak but clear lineation
patterns and apparent fracture zones accompa-
nied by the magnetic lineation discontinuity in
the northeastern corner of the Japan Basin.
Nakasa and Kinoshita (1994) have relied only
on the magnetic data with a good quality of
ships positioning.
Gravity data collection from the Japan Sea
and its adjacent area was made from surface
gravity data by Tomoda (1973). Yoshii (1979)
made a compilation of gravity data along a
line across Japanese island including large part
of the Japan Sea and discussed upper mantle
heterogeneity. Teleseismic and surface wave
study of this area revealed Moho depth (Abe
and Kanamori, 1970 ; Evans et al., 1978) and
an anisotropic configuration in the seismic ve-
locity (Okada et al., 1978 ; Chung, 1992).
The Geological Survey of Japan has accumu-
lated also gravity data on the eastern half of
the Japan Sea (Honza, 1979). Tamaki (1986)
discussed a possible age of formation of the
Japan Sea by the bottom topography of the
area. Kono and Furuse (1989) have collectd
gravity data around the Japanese Islands includ-
ing part of the Japan Sea. Nakasa and Seno
(1994) and Hirata (1995) argue the gravitational
stability of the lithosphere of the Japan Sea.
Heat flow data in the Japan Sea area were
studied extensively (e. g., Yoshii, 1972). These
data were used to consider the thermal regime
of the upper mantle beneath this area. Tamaki
(1986) and Kuramoto (1989) have estimated the
age of the Japan Sea using heat flow data and
opal A/TC boundary from the seismic reflection
profiles. They imply that the Japan Sea can be divided into three regions on average heat
flow values and noted that the western part of
the Japan Sea is younger in general. This
fact has led to some speculation that the Japan
Sea was formed passively under the influence
of shearing force between the Eurasian Plate
and the Pacific Plate due to obliquity of their
relative motion (Jolivet et al., 1991). Results
of ODP drilling (Leg 127: Tamaki et al.,
1990, and Leg 128: Tamaki et al., 1992) imply
that the Japan Sea was formed as early as 20-
25 Ma BP.
Seismic velocity structure of the crust of the
Japan Sea is one of keying parameters for un-
derstanding the evolution history of the region.
The seismic structures of the Japan Sea were
studied number of research groups (Murauchi,
1966, 1972 ; Ludwig et al., 1975 ; Hirata et
al., 1987, 1992 ; Tokuyama et al., 1987 ; Ka-
tao, 1988 ; Chung et al., 1990 ; Karp et al.,
1992 ; Shinohara and Suyehiro, 1992 ; Hirata
1995 Bikkenina et al., Submitted). It is noted
that the Japan Sea consists of combination of
Fig. 1 An index map showing approximate
positions of the Japan Sea, magnetic study area, and Mineoka ophiolite
Thick curve on the southern rim of the
Central Japan is an outline of outcrops
of the ophiolite belt. Trench and trough
systems are shown by thick curves with
triangles.
393
typical oceanic crust mainly in the Japan Basin
(northern part of the Japan Sea) and number
of blocks of continental crust under premature
extension. The tuffaceous (green tuff) layer of
4.2 km/s in seismic velocity is considered to be
distributed widely in the entire region of the
Yamato Basin (southern part of the Japan Sea)
which implies an occurrence of powerful vol-
canic activities in the past.
Magnetic characteristics of the basement lay-
ers of the oceanic lithosphere is studied in de-
tail using the experimental ODP Hole 504 B
(e. g., Kinoshita et al., 1989). It was found
also that there is a number of detachment faults
at its deeper part (e. g., Alt et al., 1993). It
is inferred from the study that the basement
magnetic lyer may be scraped off by a tectonic
shearing forces such as accretion due to sub-
duction (Kinoshita and Matsuda, 1989).
A magnetic characteristics of the Mineoka
ophiolite belt (Fig. 1) in the southern part of
Japan (the Boso Peninsula) suggests a shallow
burial of a thin and elongated magnetized body
(Kinoshita, 1995). The ophiolite belt consists
of serpentinized ultrabasic rocks and their brec-
ciated cumulates. Its main body is restricted
in a narrow band of 15 km. Geology (e. g.,
Kanehira, 1976 ; Geological Survey of Japan,
1980 ; Arai and Okada, 1991) shows that
the Mineoka belt intruded possibly along the
strike slip fault zone between the Shikoku Ba-
sin, northern tip of the Philippine Sea plate,
and the Japan landmass millions years ago in
conjunction with a large tectonic development,
such as opening of the Japan Sea followed by
the opening of the Shikoku Basin. Tonouchi
and Kobayashi (1983) proposed a model that the
Mineoka belt is buried within the upper part of
the crust and causes a broad band of geomag-
netic low in the aeromagnetic map (Utashiro
and Kondo, 1972). Ogawa and Taniguchi
(1987) note that the Mineoka Microplate devel-
oped through collision of the Izu Island-arc
with the Honshu landmass. Arai and Okada
(1991) suggest that the Mineoka belt was form-
ed by accretion of serpentine diapirs in the
forearc region. Soh et al. (1991) propose that
the Mineoka belt was produced by tectonic
fragmentation of the crust of the Izu-Bonin
arc collision. These studies are supplemented
by geophysical data on faults (Research Group
for Active Faults of Japan, 1991), gravity (Ko-
no and Furuse, 1989), and seismic structure
(Asano et al., 1979).
Magnetic field surveys were carried out most-
ly using airborne proton' magnetometers (Geo-
logical Surgey of Japan, 1980 ; JICA, 1983 ;
NEDO, 1983 as referred to in NAKAI et al.,
1987). These data were processed by adjusting
the International Geomagnetic Reference Field
(IGRF) residuals and altitude (Nakai et al.,
1987 ; Okubo et al., 1987). The thickness
and depth of the Mineoka ophiolite belt is sug-
gested to be small (e. g., Arai and Okada,
1991). It is inferred that the deeper part of
the basement beneath the Mineoka hill is less
magnetic or preferably nonmagnetic to produce
a wide low band of the magnetic field (Kino-
shita, 1995).
II. Geophysical and Geological Data
The Japan Sea
(1) Gravity and heat flow
The entire region of the Japan Sea is mostly
compensated in terms of Airy type isostasy.
Free air gravity anomaly in the Japan Basin
traces exactly the bathymetric topography ex-
cept around conspicuous seamounts. However,
the residual gravity anomaly implies that the
upper mantle beneath this region consists of
less dense materials (Yoshii, 1972). Heat flow
value distribution shows insignificant variability
394
within the entire basin area of the Japan Sea.
Only exceptional high heat flow values are
observed at around the transition boundary be-
tween Japanese landmass and the Japan Basin
where the shallow earthquakes and the crustal
deformation along fault lines are frequently
observed. The regional gravitational and heat
flow stability implies a thermal and dynamic
equilibrium of the shallower part of the upper
mantle (Nakasa and Sum, 1994 ; Hirata, 1995).
(2) Upper crust and sedimentary layers
Several measurements were carried out and
maps of sediment thickness were produced
(Ludwig et al., 1975 ; Tokuyama et al., 1987 ;
Tamaki, 1988). Recent seismic reflection sur-
veys by the Russian Research Vessel provided
a new dataset. Two way travel time of reflec-
tion profiles is read out to obtain grid data of
the acoustic basement depths. The basement
contours were drawn by solving finite differ-
ence equations (Akima, 1970, 1974 ; Briggs,
1974) after applying empirical depth correction
to the sound velocity (Ludwig et al., 1975).
The surface of the basement feature of the
Japan Basin is fairly rugged covered by sedi-
ments as thick as 3 km and there is a number
of isolated seamounts (Nakasa and Kinoshita,
1994).
(3) Seismic structure of the crust
Seismic structure of the transient region be-
tween Siberia and the Japan Basin was studied
by Bikkenina et al. (Submitted) using two-
dimensional ray tracing method rucently. The
author describes in the remarks ; " It is sugges-
ted that the basin was formed in connection
with stretching and destruction of the continen-
tal crust ". It is clearly shown in the report
that the transition shows a thinning of the
continental crust gradually into the Japan Basin
structure.
Average thickness of the Japan Sea litho-
sphere was studied by surface waves observed
at land stations (Abe and Kanamori, 1970 ;
Evans et al., 1978) with its anisotropic char-
acter (Okada et al., 1978). Marine seismo-
logical surveys were run by many works which
were based on similar principles. (e. g., Hirata
et al., 1992 ; Hirata, 1994). The seismic data
(signals and time control) used for these anal-
yses are different each other in their quality
and, therefore, the ambiguity of each dataset
are not in the same figure.
From the results of the seismic refration ex-
periments so far, the crustal structure of the
Japan Basin reveals a typical oceanic basin
(Murauchi, 1972 ; Ludwig et al., 1975 ; Hi-
rata et al., 1992 ; Hirata, 1995). The crust
consists of three oceanic layers : sedimentary
layer, layer 2 (3.3-5.9 km/s), and layer 3. The
Moho surface is almost flat in the eastern part
and slightly deeper in the western part (Yoshii,
1972 ; Hirata et al., 1992). The surface of
sediment layer overlying basaltic basement is
almost flat in contrast to rugged topography of
basement.
The other part of the Japan Sea, Yamato
Basin to south of the Japan Basin, has a semi-
continental crustal structure and its crust is as
twice thick (14 km) as that of the Japan Basin
in average (Murauchi, 1972 ; Hirata et al.,
1987, 1992 ; Katao, 1988 ; Chung et al., 1990 ;
Shinohara and Suyehiro, 1992 ; Chung, 1992 ;
Hirata, 1995). Accumulation of these data al-
lows us to draw a two dimensional cross section
of the lithosphere from continent (Siberia),
over backarc basin (Japan Sea) and island arc
(Japan) to trench (Japan or Izu Ogasawara)
systems (Fig. 2).
(4) Ages
The formation ages of the entire Japan Sea
area estimated by different approaches range
from 10 to 30 Ma (Tamaki, 1988 ; Tamaki
395
et al., 1990 Kaneoka et al., 1992). Most
of these age estimates encompass entire Japan
Sea region and refer also to various data sources
from land masses around this region. The
ODP Leg 127 reached basement volcanic layers
which give the radiometric ages as 15-19 Ma
(Tamaki et al., 1990 Kaneoka et al., 1992).
The layer reached by ODP is still under con-
troversy whether this is a part of the basement
massive flow units. The basaltic rock sample
from the Bogorov Seamount (B with a thick ar-
row in Fig. 3) indicates K-Ar age 18 Ma
(Sahno and Vasiliev, 1974).
The age of formation of the entire Japan
Sea is not clearly difined yet. It is noted how-
ever, the formation of the Japan Basin occur-
red first before 20 Ma and then the formation
of the Yamato Basin occurred later referring
number of recent data not earlier than 1980's.
For instance, the latest crustal stretching of
the Yamato Basin occurred at around 15 Ma
(e. g., Tamaki et al., 1990), significantly later
than the formation of the Japan Basin. The
Japan Sea opening is advocated by the indirect
evidence, i.e., a possible bending of the Japa-
nese Island arc at about 19-20 Ma (e.g., Otofuji
and Matsuda, 1983).
III. Age Constraints for the Japan Basin
Clear magnetic lineation patterns are observ-
ed only in the northern part of the Japan
Sea, i.e., the Japan Basin (Fig. 3). The geo-
magnetic data are applied to the age estimate
of the opening of the Japan Basin. The data
are available from the National Geophysical
Data Center (NGDC) of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.
S.A., and the Japan Oceanographic Data Cen-
ter (JODC), Geological Survey of Japan
(GSJ), Japan Maritime Safety Agency (JMSA),
Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo
(ORI), Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) and
institutions of U.S.A., Russia and ourselves.
Using 77 cruise data, a magnetic anomaly map
of the Japan Basin was made with a track line
crossover error check. All the data are re-
adjusted to IGRF 90 (International Geomag-
netic Reference Field 1990: IAGA Division
V Working Group 8, 1991).
The analysis is restricted within a rectangle
of 40-43•‹N, 131-138•‹E. In this area, a number
of magnetic lineations are found. A set of
grid data every 10 km interval from magnetic
anomalies are made after Akima (1970, 1974).
The alignments of magnetic anomaly lineations
are exaggerated by stacking the anomaly val-
ues along a fixed strike to give rise to the
best coherency (Nakasa and Kinoshita, 1994).
The model simulation is performed to iden-
tify anomaly chron (Harland et al., 1989).
There is no unique combination among param-
Fig. 2. Cross section of a continent-backarc basin-island arc region based on the study of seismic velocity structure from number of areas around Japan Original data from Yoshii (1972), Hirata et al. (1992), and Shinohara and Suye- hiro (1992). Mono depth in the Japan Basin is approximately 12-13km.
396
eters due to their trade off. A synthetic
two-dimensional block model (e.g., Bhatta-
charyya, 1964) is compared with stacked pro-
files adjusting spreading rate and direction,
layer thickness, magnetization intensity, incli-
nation and declination. The alignment of ma-
gnetic anomalies and their chron are shown in
Fig. 3 from four regions described before
estern part of region 1, age 22-23 Ma, or 23-24
Ma western part of region 1, age 16-18 Ma.
A dredge haul rock sample from the Bogorov
Seamount in the west of region 1 gave a com-
patible absolute age 18 Ma (Sahno and Vasiliev, 1974). The central region 2 is either 13-15
Ma or 22-24 Ma. The former value is too
much younger compared to other informations
and this value is discarded in the interpretation.
The western region 3 has basement age 13-15
Ma.
IV. Ophiolitt. Belt in the Boso Peninsula
(1) Crustal features
Tectonic and petrographical studies of the
region (Mineoka of Fig. 1) indicate that the
ophiolite is a group of isolated and fragmented
small bodies of serpentinized gabbroic sheet of
Cenozoic era (e. g., Arai and Okada, 1991).
This part of the crust forms a line of hills
which is bounded on both sides by fault lines
running almost east to west (Research Group
for Active Faults of Japan, 1991). Bouguer
gravity anomaly within the pair of fault lines reveals intermediately low values as low as -30m gals , and these faults are seismically inac-
tive (Kono and Furuse, 1989). Seismic structure
indicates that the longitudinal wave speed of
the basement (5-6 km/s) layer is lower than that
of surrounding basement by about 8-10 %
(Asano et al., 1979).
(2) Magnetic anomaly
The ground level (ca. 1,200 points every
100-400 meters along routes) and aeromagnetic
surveys of various altitudes (430, 1,350, and
3,150 meters : Nakai et al., 1987) were carried
out over the eastern edge of the ophiolite suits.
Diurnal variation of the magnetic field was
corrected to the total magnetic field every min-
ute by use of the observed data at the Geo-
detic Observatory, Geographical Surgey Insti-
tute of Japan near the work area. Magnetic
anomalies were calculated by subtracting IGRF
90 (IAGA Division V Working Group 8,
1991). Figure 4 is a magnetic anomaly map
based on the ground level surveys which is fil-
tered to cut off wave length shorter than 200
m. A characteristic feature for the magnetic
anomaly field of various altitudes is a NW-SE
trending deep low at higher altitudes and sharp
dipole type anomalies in the ground level pat-
terns.
(3) Model of Magnetic Crustal Structure
A low of the magnetic field can be produced
either by a magnetized body which has a nearly
horizontal south seeking magnetization vector
(e.g., Nakai et al., 1987) or by a large non-
magnetic body in the magnetic environment.
The latter case is more plausible in the present
case from the seismic study, gravity field, and
relatively low geothermal gradient (ca. 30 K/
km). The nonmagnetic basement body can
possibly exist due either to burial of sedimen-tary materials or demagnetization of basement
formations for number of tectonic reasons
brecciation, hydrothermal alteration.).
The 3-dimensional inverse modeling is car-
ried out to fix the initial model. Then, aero-
magnetic anomalies were separated into re-
gional (long wavelength) and residual (short
wavelength) components by using upward con-
tinuation after Gupta and Ramani (1980).
After removing a long wavelength magnetic
field variation, a block model is used for for-
397
Magnetic Anomaly
398
ward modeling for much detailed magnetic
field variation. Some of the conspicuous bumps
in the ground level profiles can be attributed
to a small magnetic body. A numerical model-
ing is achieved by assuming a structural situa-
tion (Fig. 5) where the position and extent of
central blocks (MB : stands for magnetic block,
and NMB : non-magnetic depression) is read-
justed to obtain better fit to the observed mag-netic configuration. A schematic cross section
of the magnetic anomaly is reproduced in Fig.
6 along an artificial track line (Monitor track in
the lower inset) which shows a composite
magnetic field and topography profiles observed
or calculated at various altitudes. The most
probable burial depth of the top face of the
Fig. 4 Magnetic anomaly map of Mineoka ophiolite belt region obtained on the ground level
Contour interval is 40nT. Lightly dotted areas indicate magnetic heighs and green to bluish
areas indicate magnetic lows.
Fig. 3 An index map of magnetic anomaly of the Japan Basin and a colored magnetic anomaly patterns in three regions (bottom figure) Solid lines are magnetic lineation patterns, Positive and Negative (R) magnetic anomalies in three rectangle regions (dotted line) corresponding to the study area of Fig. 1. The entire area is divided into three parts on the basis of three different directions of magnetic lineations. A character B with a thick arrow shows position of the Bogorov Seamount.
399
magnetized prism is between 0.5 to 1 km and
the thickness is about 0.5 km according to this
model. This value gives an approximate size
of the Mineoka ophiolite body. More detailed
modeling would be possible if we have more
magnetic dataset from wider region of this
area in the future.
V. Discussion
There is a variety of speculative interpreta-
tions on formation of the Japan Sea. These
speculations are fundamentally based upon geo-
metrical considerations to put number of patches
of islands, banks and apparent continental
fragments in the Japan Sea back together to
the coast of Siberia (left side of Fig. 7). The
splitting of the continental block was followed
by ocean floor spreading in the Japan Basin
due to external shear force (right side of Fig.
7 modified from Arai and Okada, 1991) and
then by the crustal stretching of the Yamato
Basin, southern part of the Japan Sea.
The petro-physical approach to the mecha-
nism of generation of stretching force in the
backarc region such as the Japan Sea is still
open to discussion. A mantle return flow in-
duced by subducting Pacific Plate leads to ana-
texis (high temperature hydration), dragging
Fig. 5 A schematic two-dimensional cross section model of the tectonic and structural configuration of the Mineoka ophiolite belt and its adjacent area Seismic velocities of the crust are referred to from Asano et al. (1979). Bouguer Gravity (BG) curve from Kono and Furuse (1989) , ultrabasic emplacement (a dark block near surface in the center) from Arai and Okada (1991) , and fault planes (dipping lines from surface) from Research Group for Active Faults of Japan (1991). Dotted section (MB) is magnetized prism parallel to local geomagnetic field. Blank region (NMB) is nonmagnetic due to some tectonic or depo-sitional environments.
400
hydrated peridotite deeper, dehydration, up-
welling of partial melt, then formation of wet
magma sources, or a local plume from dry
partial melt from subducted slabs (e.g., Hasebe
et at., 1970 ; Ida, 1987 ; Tatsumi, 1989).
The wedge flow is most probably governed by
thermal energy rather than mantle drag (Ida,
1987). Some discussion are given to mobility
of lighter elements (or volatiles such as water,
carbondioxide etc.) in the light of hydrofractur-
ing process which reduces effective viscosity
(e. g., Nakashima, 1993). The hydrofracturing
process is one of candidates in the interpreta-tion of high mobility of fluids within mantle.
A retreat or drooping of the subducting
lithosphere due to differential motion in the
upper and lower part of the asthenosphere may
be possible. It is likely that the upper part
of the mantle beneath the Japan Sea is unique
in a way that the mantle material over the
subducting Pacific Plate consist of lighter ma-
terials (Yoshii, 1979). This implies either that
the mantle beneath the Japan Sea has compara-
tively higher temperature or consists of lighter
materials. The higher temperature scheme
seems to be advocated by distribution of fairly
high heat flow values of the Japan Sea com-
pared to the cooling plate model.
Fig. 6 Summary of all the data available so far of the magnetic anomaly along an artificial track line (Monitor Track in the bottom inset) which is equal to full extent of horizontal axis of the top left figure
The topography, composite magnetic field profiles at various altitudes (ordinates) along the moni-tor track line (abscissa) are shown. From top to bottom of the left figure, the magnetic field cross section of 3,150 m upward filtering (Nakai et al., 1987), magnetic field profile at 1,350 m altitude
(Nakai et al., 1987), the same at 430 m altitude (Utashiro and Kondo, 1972 ; Geological Survey of Japan, 1980), ground level magnetic field profile (Kinoshita, 1995), and the topography of this area. Altitude is given in m, horizontal distance in km, and relative value of the magnetic total force of 600 nT is given by a vertical thin ar-rows in the upper part of the top right figure. Right side is showing an altitude dependencies of magnetic total force anomaly due to a two dimensional single block of a magnetized body
(magnetization intensity Jn = 1.5 A/m) exten- ding perpendicular to the face of this page. Width of the buried sheet is 8 km. Thickness of the body is about 500 m. Some magnetic field variation expected from this body are shown in the top right columnar figure. A pair of thin funnel shaped vertical lines on the left figure is a copy of those from the right figure.
401
The volcanic activities indicate that the vari-
ation of the geometry of the mantle wedge
(return flow) shifts back and forth. It is diffi-
cult to maintain a persistent return flow in a
wide area for a long period of time. Hot spot
upwelling is not applicable to the formation
of the Japan Sea because it is unlikely that
the subduction and deep rooted hot spot must
coexist or juxtapose at the same time.
If we introduce a persistent magma upwelling
in a area comparable to the Japan Basin, we
can reach the mechanism of the backarc basin
formation. It is shown by age identification
of magnetic lineation patterns over the north-
western corner of the Pacific Plate that the
age of its western part decreases toward north
or northwest (e. g., Nakanishi et al., 1989).
The timing of the consumption of the extinct
spreading center (ridge of the Kula plate) is
little known. Magnetic lineation pattern stre-
tches over about 2,000 km from 110 to 180 Ma,
from north nearby Hokkaido, Japan, to the
south nearby Ogasawara. We estimate a half
spreading rate of this part of the cule plate as
30-40 mm/year. If this rate had been persist-
ent also from 0 to 110 Ma in this region, the
stretch of about 3,000 km younger part was con-
sumed by subduction in latest 30 Ma. Number
of backarc basins along western Pacific has
occurred in 60-20 Ma. Their occurrences seems
to be interconnected although it is hard to
show their relation quantitatively. It is assum-
ed that there had once been existing ran active
opening center moving north or northwest-
ward which collided with the Eurasian Plate
and caused a drastic change in tectonic scheme
of the Pacific Plate. The oceanic ridge seg-
ments collided one after another with the com-
Fig. 7 Configuration of distribution of continental fragments around Japan Japan at present (gray dotted part in the left figure) and fragmented blocks in Miocene (patchy blocks in the left figure) , with number of tectonic lines ; trenches, faults and backarc ridges
(right figure), activated by tectonic development in accordance with the Japan Sea and the Shikoku basin openings (modified from Arai and Okada, 1991).
402
tinental fringe. From ages of backarc basins
around this area, the southern and northern
ridge segments must have collided first to form
South China Sea and Bering Sea. However,
the formation of Bering Sea can be different
and it may have been formed by entrapment of
a part of the Kula plate as proposed by Marlow
and Cooper (1983).
Cross section of the upper mantle along a
line across islandarc-basin-continent is drawn
in Fig. 2 referring to Bikkenina et at. (Submit-
ted) , Shinohara and Suyehiro (1992), and Yoshii
(1972) to discuss the vertical scheme of the sub-
duction, formation of backarc basin and intru-
sion of ophiolite (diapir) in the forearc region.
A mechanism of evolution of this system can
be as follows : (1) Subduction of the oceanic
lithosphere with active spreading center. (2)
Liquid out of the subducting slab lowers solidus
of asthenospheric materials. (3) Differentiation
of magma wells up lighter materials from the
reservoir.
These big events occurred in accordance with
the time of Japan Sea development. The esti-
mate of the age can be determined by the mag-
netic anomaly of the Japan Basin. The for-
mation age of the Japan Basin is reexamined
by model experiments to give 13-24 Ma for
the opening of the Japan Basin. Radiometric
ages, estimates from heat flow and bathymet-
ric depths range 18-26 Ma in general. While
the Japan Sea was formed followed by opening
of the Shikoku Basin, there occurred a mega-
shear motion on the southern rim of the Jap-
anese landmass (e. g., Arai and Okada, 1991)
and diapir suits occurred along this shear zone
as schematically shown in Figs. 2 and 7
(right.)
Basement layers of the oceanic lithosphere
is covered by hydrothermally altered basaltic
and ultrabasic rocks. The magnetism of the
basement rocks decay within depth 1 km from
its surface (e. g., Kinoshita et al., 1989). The
mechanical properties changes significantly in
the same depth range as observed by a change
in sound velocity of basement formations (e.
g., Alt et al., 1993). The basement magnetic
layer can easily be scraped off by accretion
and subsequent underplating (Kinoshita and
Matsuda, 1989). The accreted part of the ultra-
basic materials may play a major role in dia-
pirism of an Ophiolite body.
The amplitude of the magnetic anomalies
observed at ground level decreases rapidly at
higher altitude implying that the entire size
of Mineoka ophiolite bodies is small and con-
fined in a narrow band. A simplified two-di-
mensional crustal model of ultrabasic suits
around the Mineoka belt indicates that the di-
mension of intrusive mass is no thicker than
0.5 km and its horizontal extent is as narrow
as 8-10 km. The present two dimensional mod-
el is simplified enough to show only an approx-
imate dimension of a buried body. The root
of the diapir had to be much deeper when it
intruded. The rest of the diapir sank back
deep into the upper mantle leaving only a top-
most part of the intruded body. The three-
dimensional forward modeling can only be
obtained through much detailed informations
from the entire Mineoka area. The magnetic
intensity of this body is much stronger than
that of surrounding formations of the same level
(or crustal depth). The prism is located in the non-magnetic depression which explains
the broad band of the geomagnetic low extend-
ing to NW over the Boso Peninsula. The
Mineoka ophiolite bodies are probably floating
in non-magnetic environments. This implica-
tion is interesting for understanding a tectonic
development of this ultramafic suits.
403
VI. Summary
The trends of magnetic anomaly lineations
in the eastern, central, and western area of the
Japan Basin are slightly different in its orien-
tation of alignments. The age, spreading rate,
thickness of magnetic basement, and magnetic
intensity values seem to vary from the eastern
to western areas of the basin. The eastern
part of the east (region 1 : Fig. 3) indicates
the age around 22-24 Ma. The western part
of the east (region 1) shows younger age 16 to
18 Ma. The central region 2 has two possible
ages ; 13-15 or 22-24 Ma of which the younger
one can be discarded. The westernmost region
3 has obviously formed at pround 13-15 Ma,
the youngest age of the whole basin analyzed
magnetically so far. All these values cover a
similar range comparable to other age estima-
tes based on radiometric dating, bathymetric
features and heat flow values. Though the
magnetic modeling do not show very clear fea-
ture of the Japan Basin formation and evolu-
tion, it seems likely that the opening of the
Basin at the eastern and central parts occurred
almost at the same age. These opening centers
propagated westward with varying migration
speed during 24 and 13 Ma.
Diapir in the Japan forearc region may have
occurred in conjunction with the Japan Sea
opening. Ground magnetic surveys were car-
ried out in order to define the dimension of the
intrusive body in the southern part of the Boso
Peninsula. It is concluded that the size of dia-
pir left on land is comparatively small 0.5
km •~ 8 km in its cross section which may have
been a result of diaprism along shear zone pro-
duced by backarc basin formations.
Acknowledgment
The author would like to express thanks to. Dr. E. Kikawa, Geological Survey of Japan, for his critical arguments and suggestions. The author would hear-tily appreciate Prof. K. Suyehiro, Ocean Research Institute, Prof. N. Hirata, Earthquake Research In-stitute, for providing data and scientific comments. This program was partly supported by the Grant-In-Aid for International Scientific Research Program, Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.
References
Abe, K. and Kanamori, H. (1970) : Mantle structure beneath the Japan Sea as revealed by surface waves. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo, 48, 1011-1021.
Akima, H. (1970) : A new method of interpolation and smooth curve fitting based on local procedures. J. Acm. (Association for computing machinery), 17, 589-602.
Akima, H. (1974) : A method of bivariate interpo-lation and smooth surface fitting based on local pro-
cedures. Comm. Acm., 17, 18-20. Alt, J., C. Kinoshita, H., Stokking, L. B. and Ship-
board Scientific Party (1993) : Costa Rica Rift. Alt, J. C., Kinoshita, H., Stokking, L. B. et al. eds. : Proc. ODP Init. Repts., 148, 27-352.
Arai, S. and Okada, H. (1991) : Petrology of serpen-tine sandstone as a key to tectonic development of serpentine belts. Tectonophysics, 195, 65-81.
Asano, S., Ichinose, Y., Hasegawa, I., Iizuka, S. and Suzuki, H. (1979) : Crustal structure in the southern Kanto district derived from explosion seis-mic data. J. Seismol. Soc. Japan, 2-32, 41-55.
Bhattacharyya, B. K. (1964) : Magnetic anomalies due to prism-shapes bodied with arbitrary polar-ization, Geophysics, 14, 517-531.
Bikkenina, S. K., Zhiltsov, E. G., Sergeev, K. F. and Solivjev, V. N. (submitted) : New Seismic struc-tural model of earth's crust in the northern part of the Japan Sea. J. Phys. Earth.
Briggs, I. C. (1974) : Machine contouring using min-imum curvature. Geophysics, 39-1, 39-48.
Chung, T. W. (1992) : A quantitative study of seis-mic anisotropy in the Yamato Basin, the south-eastern Japan Sea, from refraction data collected by an ocean bottom seismographic array. Geophys. J. Int., 109, 620-638.
Chung, T. W., Hirata, N. and Sato, R. (1990) : Two-dimensional P-and S-wave velocity structure of the Yamato Basin, the southeastern Japan Sea, from refraction data collected by an ocean bottom seismographic array. J. Phys. Earth, 38, 99-147.
404
Evans, J. R., Suyehiro, K. and Sacks, I. S. (1978) :
Mantle structure beneath the Japan Sea•\ re-
examination. Geophys. Res. Lett., 5, 478-490.
Geological Survey of Japan (1980) : 1 : 200,000
Aeromagnetic charts.
Gupta, V. K. and Ramani, N. (1980) : Some aspects
of regional-residual separation of gravity anomalies
in a Precambrian terrain. Geophysics, 45, 1412-
1426.
Hasebe, K., Fujii, N. and Uyeda, S. (1970) : Ther-
mal process under island arcs, Tectonophysics, 10,
335-355.
Harland, W. B., Armstrong, R. L., Cox, A. V.,
Craig, L., Smith, A. G. and Smith, D. G. (1989) :
A Geologic time scale. Cambridge Univ. Press,
Cambridge, 263p.
Hirata, N. (1995) : Seismic crustal structure of the
marginal basins in the western Pacific : New re-
sults by OBS observation. Proc. of Advanced Re-
search Workshop at Mallorca, Spain, NATO 1994
Year Book (in press).
Hirata, N., Kinoshita, H., Suyehiro, K., Suyemasu,
M., Matsuda, N., Ouchi, T., Katao, H., Koresawa,
S. and Nagumo, S. (1987) : Report on DELP 1985
cruise in the Japan Sea, Part II . Seismic refraction
experiment conducted in the Yamato Basin,
Southeast Japan Sea. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst.,
Univ. Tokyo, 62, 347-365.
Hirata, N., Karp, B. Y., Yamaguchi, T., Kanazawa,
T., Suyehiro, K., Kasahara, J., Shiobara, H., Shi-
nohara, M. and Kinoshita, H. (1992) : Oceanic
crust in the Japan Basin of the Japan Sea by the
1990 Japan-USSR expedition. Geophys. Res. Lett.,
19, 2027-2030.
Honza, E. (1979) : Geological investigation of the
Japan Sea, April-June, 1978 (GH 78-2). Cruise
Rept., 13, Geological Survey of Japan.
IAGA Division V Working Group 8 (1991) : Inter-
national Geomagnetic Reference Field, 1990 Revi-
sion. J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 43, 1007-1012.
Ida, Y. (1987) : Structure of the mantle wedge and
volcanic activities in the island arcs. Maghnani,
M. H. and Syono, Y. eds. : High Pressure Res.
Terra Publ. Co., Tokyo/AGU, Washington, D.
C., 473-480.
Isezaki, N. (1986) : A magnetic anomaly map of
the Japan Sea. J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 38, 403-410.
JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency)
(1983) : 1 : 200,000 Aeromagnetic charts over
Uraga Strait.
Jolivet, L., Huchon, P., Brun, J. P., Le Pichon, X.,
Chamot-Rooke, N. and Thomas, J. C. (1991) :
Arc deformation and marginal basin opening :
Japan Sea as a case study. J. Geophys. Res., 96,
4367-4384.
Kanehira, K. (1976) : Mode of occurrence of serpen-tinite and basalt in the Mineoka district, southern Boso Peninsula. Mem. Geol. Soc. Japan, 13, 43-50.
Kaneoka, I., Takigami, Y., Takaoka, N., Yamashita, S. and Tamaki, K. (1992) : 40 Ar-39 Ar analysis of volcanic rocks recovered from the Japan Sea floor : Constraints on the age of formation of the Japan Sea. Proc. ODP, Sci. Res., 127/128, Pt. 2, 819-836.
Karp, B. Y., Hirata, N., Kinoshita, H., Suyehiro, K., Zdorovenin, V. V. and Karnaukh, V. N. (1992) : USSR-Japan seismic experiment in the Japan Sea,
preliminary results. Pacific Geology, No. 5, 138-147 (in Russian).
Katao, H. (1988) : Seismic structure and formation of the Yamato Basin. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 63, 51-86.
Kinoshita, H. (1995) : Backarc evolution and Ophi-olite formations. Proc. of Advanced Research Workshop at Mallorca, Spain, NATO 1994 Year Book (in press) .
Kinoshita, H. and Matsuda, N. (1989) : Seismic struc-ture and geomagnetic anomaly in the Nankai Trough related to subduction of the Philippine Sea Plate. J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 41, 161-173.
Kinoshita, H., Furuta, T. and Pariso, J. (1989) : Downhole magnetic field measurements and paleo-magnetism, Hole 504 B, Costa Rica Ridge. Proc. ODP, Sci., Res., 111, 147-156.
Kono, M. (1986) : Magnetic anomalies in the Sea of Japan : A speculation of the tectonic history. J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 38, 411-426.
Kono, Y. and Furuse, N. (1989) : Gravity anomaly map in and around the Japanese islands. Univ. Tokyo Press (with sheet maps and explanatory in
Japanese). Kuramoto, S. (1989) : Age and mode of the Japan
Sea Opening, a review. Month. Earth, 11, 503-512 (in Japanese).
Ludwig, W. J., Murauchi, S. and Houts, R. E. (1975) : Sediments and structure of the Japan Sea. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 87, 651-664.
Marlow, M. S. and Cooper, A. K. (1983) : Wan-dering tarranes in Southern Alaska : The Aleutian microplate and implications for the Bering Sea. J. Geophys. Res., 88, 3439-3446.
Murauchi, S. (1966) : Explosion seismology. Second Progress Report on the Upper Mantle Project of Japan ( 1965-1966). Natl. Committee for UMP, Sci. Council of Japan, 11-13.
Murauchi, S. (1972) : Crustal structure in the Sea of Japan from seismic exploration. Kagaku, 42, 367-375 (in Japanese).
Nakai, J., Komazawa, M. and Okubo, Y. (1987) :
405
Distribution of gravity anomalies and aeromagnetic anomalies in the Kanto district. J. Geogr. (Chigaku-Zasshi), 96, 185-200 (in Japanese with English abstract).
Nakanishi, M., Tamaki, K. and Kobayashi, K. (1989) : Mesozoic magnetic anomaly lineations and seafloor spreading history of the northwestern Pa-cific. J. Geophys. Res., 94, 15437-15462.
Nakasa, Y. and Seno, T. (1994) : Compensation Mechanism of the Yamato Basin, the Japan Sea. J. Phys. Earth, 42, 187-195.
Nakasa, Y. and Kinoshita, H. (1994) : A Supplement to Magnetic Anomaly of the Japan Basin. J. Geo-mag. Geoelectr., 46, 481-500.
Nakashima, Y. (1993) : Static stability and propa-gation of a fluid-fluid edge crack in rock : Implica-tion for fluid transport in magmatism and meta-morphism. J. Phys. Earth, 41, 189-202.
Okada, H., Moriya, T., Matsuda, T., Hasegawa, T., Asano, S., Kasahara, N., Ikami, A., Aoki, H., Sasaki, Y., Harukawa, N. and Matsumura, K. (1978) : Volocity anisotropy in the Sea of Japan as revealed by big explosions. J. Phys. Earth, 26, 491-502.
Okubo, Y., Urai, M., Tsu, H., Ogawa, K., Haseba, K. and Nobayashi, S. (1987) : A three-dimensional map of Curie Temperature depths of Japan. Ge-ology News, 395, 1-4.
Ogawa, Y. and Taniguchi, H. (1987) : Geology and tectonics of the Miura-Boso peninsulas and the adja-cent area. Modern Geology, 12, 147-168.
Otofuji, Y. and Matsuda, T. (1983) : Paleomagnetic evidence for the clockwise rotation of southwest
Japan. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 62, 349-359. Research Group for Active Faults of Japan ed. (1991) :
Active faults in Japan. Univ. of Tokyo Press, 437p.
Sahno, B. G. and Vasiliev, B. I. (1974) : Basaltoids of the Japan Sea Bottom. Basilkovsky N. P. and Karp, B. Y. ed. : Far east sci. 52-55 (InRussian).
Seama, N. and Isezaki, N. (1990) : Sea-floor magne-tization in the eastern part of the Japan Basin and its tectonic implications. Tectonophysics, 181, 285-297.
Shinohara, M. and Suyehiro, K. (1992) : Seismic structure and dynamics of the upper mantle of island arc-trench systems. Earth monthly, 14, 341-347 (in Japanese).
Soh, W., Pickering, K. T., Taira, A. and Toku-yama, H. (1991) : Basin evolution in the arc-arc
Izu collision zone, Mio-Pliocene Miura group, cen-tral Japan. J. Geol. Soc. London, 148, 317-330.
Tamaki, K. (1986) : Age estimation of the Japan Sea on the basis of stratigraphy, basement depth, and heat flow data. J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 38, 427-446.
Tamaki, K. (1988) : Geological structure of the Japan Sea. Bull. Geol. Surv. Japan, 39-5, 269-365.
Tamaki, K., Pisciotto, K. A., Allan, J. and Ship-board Scientific Party (1990): Proc. ODP Init. Repts., 127. College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program), 844p.
Tatsumi, Y. (1989) : Migration of fluids and genesis of basalt magmas in subduction zones. J. Geophys. Res., 94, 4697-4707.
Tamaki, K., Suyehiro, K., Allan, J., Ingle, J. C. Jr. and Pisciotto, K. A. (1992) : Tectonic synthesis and implications of Japan Ser ODP drilling. Proc. ODP, Sci. Res., 127/128, Pt. 2, 1332-1348.
Terada, T. (1934) : On bathymetrical features of the Japan Sea. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 12, 650-656.
Tokuyama, H., Suyemasu, M., Tamaki, K., Nishi-
yama, E., Kuramoto, S., Suyehiro, K., Kinoshita, H. and Taira, A. (1987) : Report on DELP 1985 cruises in the Japan Sea Part 3 : Seismic reflection studies in the Yamato Basin and Yamato Rise Area. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 62, 367-390.
Tomoda, Y. (1973) : Maps of Free air and Bouguer
gravity anomalies in and around Japan. Univ. of Tokyo Press.
Tonouchi, S. and Kobayashi, K. (1983) : Paleomag-netic and geotectonic investigation of Ophiolite suits and surrounding rocks in south central Honshu, Japan. Hashimoto, M. and Uyeda, S. eds. : Accre-tion Tectonics in the circum-Pacific regions. Terra, Sci. Publ. Tokyo, 261-288.
Utashiro, S. and Kondo, T. (1972) : Aeromagnetic surveys over the southern part of Kanto District in Japan. Rep. of Hydrographic Researches, 18, 1-12 (in Japanese).
Yoshii, T. (1972) : Terrestrial heat flow and fea-tures of the upper mantle beneath the Pacific and the Sea of Japan. J. Phys. Earth, 20, 271-285.
Yoshii, T. (1979) : Compilation of geophysical data around the Japanese Islands-1. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 54, 75-117.
(Received 9 January, 1995 ; Accepted 20 March, 1995)
406
背弧 海盆 の形成 とオ フィオ ライ トの成 因
木 下 肇* 仲佐ゆか り* 森尻理恵** 富士原敏也***
日本海の北部 日本海盆の海上地磁気異常縞模様
配列から,海 盆の形成年代を改めて推計した。こ
の解析には,従 来の情報に加えて1989-1991年 度
の目露海域共同研究等によって得 られた各種の地
学的新情報を投入し,日 本海盆の地磁気による推
定形成年代を13-24Maと した。一方房総半島南
部に露出するオフィオライ ト岩体の地磁気探査か
ら,地 震波速度構造等を参考にして,地 磁気によ
る地殻構造モデルを作 った。この帯は従来より,
日本海,四 国海盆形成 にほぼ同期 して発生 したと
する説があり,テ クトニクス的に目本海や四国海
盆形成とこのオフィオライ ト帯形成の関連に興味
が もたれている。筆者 らは沈み込み付加帯下地殻
の磁気構造と減衰,並 びに海洋底基盤岩層の磁気
的特性の研究をおこなってきた。本論説 の内容は
その延長である。但 し日本海と日本南部のオフィ
オライ ト形成の時間ウィンドウについては嶺岡山
帯の形成時間の決定不足 もあ り,今 回の議論では
完全に絞 り込めたとは言えない。やや問題提起 も
含めて,成 果の総論を示す。
* 東京大学地震研究所
** 工業技術院地質調査所
*** 東京大学海洋研究所
407