5
Forcing climatic factors Biodiversity & water quality Socio/Econ/Cult state Social perception | AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM SERVICES Methods (a) Original SAFER Methodologies Schematic Climate, Limnological & Ecological history Socio/Econ/Cult history Method s (b) Prediction of impacts on Risk & Perceptio ecosystem Analysis Climatic projections Economic & land use scenarios Method s (c) Human PRESENT FUTURE Occupation (

Forcing climatic factors Biodiversity & water quality Socio/Econ/Cult state Social perception | AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM SERVICES Methods (a) Original SAFER Methodologies

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Forcing climatic factors Biodiversity & water quality Socio/Econ/Cult state Social perception | AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM SERVICES Methods (a) Original SAFER Methodologies

Forcing climatic factorsBiodiversity & water quality

Socio/Econ/Cult stateSocial perception

|AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM SERVICES

Methods (a)

Original SAFER Methodologies Schematic

Climate, Limnological & Ecological history

Socio/Econ/Cult history

Methods (b)

Prediction of impacts on Risk & Perception ecosystem Analysis Climatic projectionsEconomic & land use scenarios

Methods (c)

PAST Human PRESENT FUTURE Occupation (2100)

Page 2: Forcing climatic factors Biodiversity & water quality Socio/Econ/Cult state Social perception | AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM SERVICES Methods (a) Original SAFER Methodologies

Tier 1 Modeling (in general)• “Tier 1” models (vocabulary from the Natural Capital Group) are vastly simplified,

first-approximation models (usually simple indices) characterizing water, ecosystem or socioeconomic states throughout an area (each would be mapped).– Example 1 (climate): A tier 1 climatic model would be the annual water yield for a land area,

which is a function of precipitation and evapotranspiration– Example 2 (biodiversity): A tier 1 biodiversity model would be some combination of habitat

quality and habitat rarity indices.– Example 3 (socioeconomic: A tier 1 tourism services model would be a map summarizing

tourism opportunities along with accessibility and environmental attributes (i.e., some form of “potential tourism” index)• Note: First, we may want to map simpler socioeconomic indices related to population, income,

education, etc.—yes(??)

• Limitations: (1) Causes and effects are not connected; (2) Analysis typically only possible at the annual time scale, so shorter-term (e.g., seasonal) processes are averaged.

• Tier 1 modeling should be do-able as team science in the short term. For example, small student teams could easily GIS analyses for multiple sites.

Page 3: Forcing climatic factors Biodiversity & water quality Socio/Econ/Cult state Social perception | AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM SERVICES Methods (a) Original SAFER Methodologies

Tier 2 Modeling (in general)

• “Tier 2” models (vocabulary from the Natural Capital Group) are more details and capable of simulating distributed processes and mechanisms in physical, ecological and socioeconomic systems.– Example 1 (climate): A tier 2 climatic model would be a distributed parameter hydrologic

model (e.g., SWAT, WEAP, VIC)– Example 2 (biodiversity): A tier 2 biodiversity model might involve might include a

keystone species population model, or a model capable of addressing the food web and multiple populations

– Example 3 (socioeconomic): A tier 2 tourism services might predict annual visitor-days or dollars based on environmental attributes, infrastructure, amenities, distance from population centers, and location relative to potential substitute sites.

• Limitations: Tier 2 models require substantially more input parameters than do Tier 1 models, and take longer to learn how to use effectively

• Tier 2 modeling will typically require prolonged efforts by graduate students, perhaps as key components of their dissertation work, and may be integrated later with comparable modeling studies by other students.

Page 4: Forcing climatic factors Biodiversity & water quality Socio/Econ/Cult state Social perception | AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM SERVICES Methods (a) Original SAFER Methodologies

Methods (a)—SAFER• Forcing climatic factors:– Map climate surfaces (temp, precip)– From climate surfaces and soil surveys, map water yield, Budyko

dryness, and water retention indices• Socio/Econ/Cult State– Map various socioeconomic indices (population density, land

ownership, land use, etc.)• Cultural/spiritual indices? Maybe deal with in terms of peoples’

perceptions?• Biodiversity and water quality:– Map habitat quality (related to water quality), habitat rarity

indices—is this feasible for all our sites?• Identify correlations between various indices

Page 5: Forcing climatic factors Biodiversity & water quality Socio/Econ/Cult state Social perception | AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM SERVICES Methods (a) Original SAFER Methodologies

Methods (c)—SAFER• For 2030, 2050, 2100– Generate forecasts of climate surfaces

• Using regional modeling products (if they exist)• If not, how? Downscale available GCM outputs?

– Use forecasts to generate new hydro/climate indices– Propose population and LULC scenarios– Generate habitat/ecosystem quality and rarity maps

• Quantify risk in terms of ecosystem-related indices changes in habitat quality and rarity maps