40
Polymer flooding - an option for NCS? Arne Skauge CIPR, Uni Research 14:30 – 15:15 CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH News in the R&D front - New possibilities Force workshop 6-7 Nov 2013

Force workshop 6-7 Nov 2013 Competence... · Force workshop 6-7 Nov 2013. ... pressure maintenance 80 %RF CIPR ... Water or Gas injection 40 to 50% Water injection 20 to 30% Water

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Polymer flooding - an option for NCS?

Arne Skauge

CIPR, Uni Research

14:30 – 15:15

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHCIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

News in the R&D front - New possibilitiesForce

workshop 6-7 Nov 2

013

OilOil RecoveryRecovery FactorFactor

Primary production

Primary and secondary recovery leads to an average RF of 35%

Secondary recovery

Natural flow and artificial lift techniques (pumps)

Water or Gas Injection ; pressure maintenance

80%RF

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

40 to 50%

Wateror Gas

injection

40 to 50%

Waterinjection 20 to 30%

Waterinjection

5-20% Water injection

Worldwide Average RF ~35%

20

40

80

60

%RF

Oil viscosity (cp)0.1 1 10 100 103 104

OIL VISCOSITY (µµµµo) ����

%RF

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

OilOil RecoveryRecovery FactorFactor

Primary production

Secondary recovery Tertiary recoveryChemical

Polymer Flooding:

� Improves initial sweep efficiency

� Prevents early fingering

� Water cut reduction compensates for the cost of chemicals

80%RF

Expectations on the efficiency of polymer based floods

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

40 to 50%

Wateror Gas

injection

40 to 50%

Waterinjection 20 to 30%

Waterinjection

5-20% Water injection

RF ~70%

Oil viscosity (cp)

+5 to 15%Polymer only

+5 to10% Polymer only20

40

80

60

%RF

0.1 1 10 100 103 104

OIL VISCOSITY (µµµµo) ����

%RF

+ 5- 10%+ additional recovery by polymer from lower µµµµo

heterogeneous systems

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

OilOil RecoveryRecovery FactorFactor

Primary production

Secondary recovery Tertiary recoveryChemical

Polymer Flooding:

� Improves initial sweep efficiency

� Prevents early fingering

� Water cut reduction compensates for the cost of chemicals

80%RF

Expectations on the efficiency of polymer based floods

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

40 to 50%

Wateror Gas

injection

40 to 50%

Waterinjection 20 to 30%

Waterinjection

5-20% Water injection

RF ~70%

Oil viscosity (cp)

+5 to 15%Polymer only

+5 to10% Polymer only20

40

80

60

%RF

0.1 1 10 100 103 104

OIL VISCOSITY (µµµµo) ����

%RF

+ 5- 10%+ additional recovery by polymer from VERY HIGH µµµµo

in Alberta+ - heavy oil

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Polymer Sweep Efficiency in Reservoirs

The profile of “incremental oil” in Polymer flooding

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH 5

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Reservoir Screening CriteriaWhere Polymer Flooding Could be Applied (1991)

1991

ScreeningCriterion

Visc. controlpolymer flood

Het. controlpolymer flood Comment

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHCIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH 6

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Reservoir Screening CriteriaWhere Polymer Flooding Could be Applied (1991)

1991

ScreeningCriterion

Visc. controlpolymer flood

Het. controlpolymer flood Comment

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHCIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH 7

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Experiment E2000

Slab dimensions (cm) 30 x 29,8 x 2,55

x = 30 cm

y = 30 cm

z = 2 cm

injection

x x x

1 2 3

Polymers for heavy oil

Porosity 0,248

Pore Volume, PV (ml) 546

Swi 0,13

kw(Sw = 1) (Darcy) 2,3

Oil viscosity (cP) 2000

Injected Volumes (PV):

Water flood (PV) 2,3

Polymer flood (PV) 1,5

Polymer viscosity

58 cP at 10s-1

24 cP at 70s-1

Polymer 3630S

Skauge, A., Ormehaug, P.A., Vik, B.F., Fabbri, C., Bondino, I, and Hamon, G., Polymer Flood Design for Displacement of Heavy Oil analysed by 2D-imaging, EAGE 17th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, St. Petersburg, Russia, 16 - 18 April 2013

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Technical data for measuring system

- X-ray adsorption

- Gamma adsorption

- X-ray camera

Saturation estimation methods

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHCIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHCentre for Integrated Petroleum Research, Bergen, Norway

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHCIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHCentre for Integrated Petroleum Research, Bergen, Norway

Example viscous fingering at the model inlet

Pictures from X-ray camera

Slabs up to 1meter x 1meter

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

2D-experiments using X-ray detection

Material: Bentheimer slabs 30cm x 30cm x 2 cm

Type of fingering observed during unstable displacement

Adverse mobility ratio floods

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHCentre for Integrated Petroleum Research, Bergen, Norway

Sharpening (1) Spreading (2) Indifferent (3)

1. Sharpening fingers grow from the tip of the finger and established fingers is reinforced

(observed for miscible displacement when the mobility ratio was unfavourable [viscosity ratio 100 : 1])

2. Spreading fingers increase the area contacted with frontal displacement, thicker front)(observed when water was injected at 100% oil saturation and strong spontaneous water imbibition occur)

3. Indifferent process - no visible fingers appears even at very unfavourable mobility ratio (observed for waterflooding at Swi, both at high and low interfacial tensions)

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Waterflood E2000

Viscous water fingers develops into channels at later stage

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

OBSERVATIONS

Fractal type fingers is formed at early stage of the

waterflood

Early breakthrough of water (0,04 PV)Early breakthrough of water (0,04 PV)

Fingers is broadened and the stronger fingers progress

Fingers collapse into channels at later stage

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Water- and polymer flood

40

50

60

70

Oil R

ec

ov

ery

(%

OO

IP)

Polymer both increase oil recovery and accelerate production

0

10

20

30

40

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Injected Volume (PV)

Oil R

ec

ov

ery

(%

OO

IP)

E7000

E2000Force

workshop 6-7 Nov 2

013

Oil mobilization during polymer flood

X-ray camera visualize change in oil and water saturation

2000 cP oil Change in saturations after end of waterflood

Red: increased oil saturation

Light blue: increased water saturation

Early oil mobilization through established water channels

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Change in local oil saturation during waterflood

Water channels reach low So early

Oil saturation at the end of waterflood

Sorw=0,25

Water channels reach low So early

No change in So

In unswept areas

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Oil saturations

in water channels

Position:

Border of a water

channel

Polymer flood 1,5 PV

Oil

bank

Polymer swept area

Position:

Center of a

water channel

Oil saturation at the end of polymer flood0,25 PV

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Effluent production

P C P C

First polymer slug (0.5 PV) seems sufficient slug size for maximizing oil production

Li tracer in chase water has a breakthrough around 0.5 PV

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Polymers for EOR

BIOPOLYMERS SYNTHETIC POLYMERS

19

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

“Polyacrylamide” or “HPAM” Polymers

[ - CH2 - CH - ]m - [ - CH2 - CH - ]n

C C

- O O O NH2

acrylate acrylamide

“Polyacrylamide” or “HPAM” Polymers

[ - CH2 - CH - ]m - [ - CH2 - CH - ]n

C C

- O O O NH2

acrylate acrylamide

Polymers

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

XanthanPolysaccharide

Double helix, semi-rigid rod.

Flexible coil

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Polymer Structure

Conformation of HPAM in high and low salinity

HPAM is a polyelectrolyte - polyanionic

21

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Polymer Structure

Structure of HPAM - degree of hydrolysis

22

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Polymer Structure

HPAM - degree of hydrolysis with ageing

23

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

AM: acrylamide

Code name type AM/AA AMPS n-VP

Superpusher SAV 522 n-VP Polymer 4 25-45% 20-25% 35-50%

Superpusher SAV 301 n-VP Polymer 3 50-65% 20-25% 15-25%

DP/GC 2878-6 n-VP Polymer 2 60-70% 20-25% 10-15%

DP/GC 2878-3 n-VP Polymer 1 65-75% 20-25% 5-10%

AN 125 SH AMPS Polymer 75-80% 20-25%

Flopaam 3630S F3P HPAM Polymer+ 100 %

Examples of high temperature and high salinity polymers

Salttolerance

Tempstability

New polymers

Best choice of polymer

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

AA: acrylate

AMPS: 2-Acrylamido-2-Methylpropane Sulfonate

n_VP: n-Vinyl Pyrrolidone

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Viscosity as a function of aging time for HPAM and AN132Conditions: 80ºC, 5 wt. % NaCl included 3 wt. % IBA, Viscosity at a shear rate of 100 s-1

Best choice of polymer

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

Sulfonation degree increase thermal stability

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Some positive news about salinity tolerant polymers

Effect of sulfonationdegree on viscosity and retention in saline brine

Retention

AN132 ~ 1/10 HPAM

Best choice of polymer

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

Hydrolysed PolyAcrylaMide

different sulfonationdegrees

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Polymer retention – influence onpolymer flow in porous media

Straining

Bridging adsorption

Flow-induced adsorption

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

Hydrodynamic retention

Depleted layer

Inaccessible pore volume (IPV)

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Polymer retention – influence onpolymer flow in porous media

Straining

Bridging adsorption

Flow-induced adsorption

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

Hydrodynamic retention

Depleted layer

Inaccessible pore volume (IPV)

May lead to:

- Blocking of pore space (IPV)

- Early break-through

- Plugging / pressure increase

- Varying polymer concentration in effluent

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Polymer retention – influence onpolymer flow in porous media

Straining

Bridging adsorption

Flow-induced adsorption

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

Hydrodynamic retention

Depleted layer

Inaccessible pore volume (IPV)During extensional flow – bridging or multilayeradsorption (Chauveteau and co-workers)

May lead to:

- Blocking of pore space (IPV)

- Early break-through

- Face plugging / injectivity reduction

- Increased loss of polymer

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Polymer retention – influence onpolymer flow in porous media

Straining

Bridging adsorption

Flow-induced adsorption

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

Hydrodynamic retention

Depleted layer

Inaccessible pore volume (IPV)«Slip effect» -mixed effect, depends on severalfactors

May lead to:

- Early break-through

- Poor sweep

- Decreased viscosity at Newtonian flow

- Increased effective shear rate

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Polymer retention – influence onpolymer flow in porous media

No adsorption, No IPV 20 % PV adsorption, No IPV

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

0 % PV adsorption, 25 % PV IPV 20 % PV adsorption, 25 % PV IPV

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Fluid models for viscoelasticity

η

a b c d e f g

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHCIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHγ

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Fluid models for viscoelasticity

UVM

η

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHCIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHγ

Power law Ellis

Carreau

Stavland

γ

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Fluid models for viscoelasticity

� Power law

� Ellis model

� Carreau equation

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHCIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

� Carreau equation

� UVM

� Stavland

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Low salinity polymer

Viscosities: Oil: 2,4cP LS brine: 1,03cP Polymer: 2,6cP

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

Source: Behruz Shiran and Arne Skauge, 2012

High salinity WF

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Example – nano particle polymersSandstone reservoir core (fresh core), K=900 mD

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

Oil R

eco

very

(H

CP

V)

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00

Volume injected (PV)

Oil R

eco

very

(H

CP

V)

waterflood LPSForce

workshop 6-7 Nov 2

013

In Out

Micro channel

Velocity vectors in a rectangular micro channel

Polymer particle trackingMicromodels and m-PIV (particle image velocimetry)

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHCIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

z1

z2

Z …

zN

plane 1

plane 2

plane …

plane N

(Xi,j, yi,j)

In

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Polymer Sweep Efficiency in Reservoirs

Linear displacement efficiency (Buckley-Leverett)DO POLYMERS REDUCE RESIDUAL OIL below Sor ???Chinese school of thought on this also ….

Xia et al, SPE 114335 claim in Exptl. + Modelling Study Mechanism of the Effect of Microforces on Residual Oil in Chemical Flooding

Sor reduction as function of Weissenberg No., We = xxx

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH 38

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

Example of game changer

Polymer floodingTraditionally polymer is injected for sweep improvement

Old rules of tumbs

Poor injectivity (a lot of positive results on injectivity are now available)

Little effect after extensive waterflooding (new results disprove this statement)

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCHCIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

this statement)

Have to modify the viscosity ratio extensively (new results disprove this statement)

Additional news

Effect on microscopic displacement (lower Sor)

(viscoelastic effects, etc)

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013

CIPR – CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PETROLEUM RESEARCH

Force works

hop 6-7 Nov 2013