21
FORCE PRESERVATION FORCE PRESERVATION IN IN GARRISON GARRISON

FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

FORCE PRESERVATIONFORCE PRESERVATIONININ

GARRISONGARRISON

Page 2: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

OverviewOverview

• Status of the force• Risks in garrison• Mitigation lines of operation• Projects• Conclusion

Slide 1

Page 3: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Status of the Force:Status of the Force:SuicidesSuicides

30

2326

34

2825

33

42

52

810

5 5

12

7 8

13

911

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

MC Suicides I MEF Suicides

Suicides in 2010 are at a slower pace than 2009: down 63% for MC; down 55% for I MEF

Slide 2

Page 4: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Status of the Force:Status of the Force:Ground MishapsGround Mishaps

Ground Mishap Status FY10

On Duty Class A* (FY09 = 2) 2 Motorcycle Fatalities (FY09 = 7) 1

Off Duty Class A (FY09 = 17) 9 PMV4 Fatalities* (FY09 = 9) 5

Mishap Fatalities (FY09 = 25) 10 GMV Class A (FY09 = 2) 1

RODS Class A (FY09 = 3) 1

Slide 3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10

Note: all trends decreasing except motorcycle fatalities

On-Duty Class A

Off-Duty Class A

Mishap Fatalities

PMV4 Fatalities

Motorcycle Fatalities

Linear (MotorcycleFatalities)

* While total Class A mishaps are projected to be less than FY-2009, on duty Class A mishaps and PMV4 fatalities are projected to exceed FY-2009 numbers.

Red: increased pace in 2010 than 2009

Yellow: same pace as 2009

Green: slower pace than 2009

Page 5: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Status of the Force:Status of the Force:Officer to Enlisted RatioOfficer to Enlisted Ratio

Main

Forward

(9)

(8)

(14)Slide 4

Page 6: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Status of the Force:Status of the Force:Medical IssuesMedical Issues

Limited duty or awaiting PEB for Chronic Pain or mental health issues

Hypothesis: Severe chronic pain sufferers are predisposed tomental health issues, such as depression and addiction which can lead to still other issues – i.e. legal, medical, psychiatric, PTSD.

Slide 5

LIMDU PEB TOTAL

Command Element

8 5 13

1stMARDIV 108 50 158

3dMAW 26 17 43

1stMLG

TOTALS 142 72 214

Page 7: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Status of the Force:Status of the Force:Medical IssuesMedical Issues

On psychiatric medications

Slide 6

Command Element 252

1stMARDIV 1132

3dMAW 603

1stMLG 560

TOTALS 2547

Who are these Marines? Are they taking a “cocktail” of medications? What risks do they present: Addiction, Legal, Health, Force Protection?

Page 8: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Status of the Force:Status of the Force:Medical IssuesMedical Issues

Completed alcohol treatment

FY09 - 822

FY10 - 697

Slide 7

Screened for alcohol treatment

FY09 - 1928

FY10 - 1192

Screened for drug treatment

FY09 - 597

FY10 - 455

Completed drug treatment

FY09 - 363

FY10 - 138

Presently, no data available on numbers “in treatment” or who were “treatment failures.”

Down 7%

Up 27%

Up 14% Down 43%

Page 9: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Status of the Force:Status of the Force:Medical IssuesMedical Issues

Urinalysis

Slide 8

FY09 FY10 Change %

Total Samples Tested

223,543 153,213 Up 2%

Positive Samples

1259 774 Down 8%

Positive Individuals

749 529 Up 6%

One individual may have multiple positive samples.

Page 10: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Status of the Force:Status of the Force: Legal Issues Legal Issues

Pending courts-martial:

Slide 9

GCM SPCM SCM ART 32

TOTAL

1stMARDIV 5 37 30 11 83

3dMAW 3 22 0 9 34

1stMLG 3 13 6 0 22

TOTALS 11 72 36 20 139

No Command Element Cases at Present

Down 28% from last year’s Qtr

average

Page 11: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

24 y.o. Stayed at home of a fellow Marine watching movies. SNM found dead.

PTSD treatment since 2007. Multiple psychiatric medications

Referred for alcohol dependency on 22 Jan. Died 13 Mar. CSACC apt 17 Mar.

23 y.o. Marine dies of heat stroke following a platoon run with flak jacket and SAPI plates.

How did our Corpsmen and EMTs respond? What protocols were they trained to and did they perform to standards?

24y.o. found unconscious in his apartment by a female companion. Attempts to revive failed. SNM in UA status for 11 days. On medical –hold past EAS for 12+ mo awaiting PEB Issued narcotics (Percocet) while UA

21 y.o. Marine died after night of heavy drinking with fellow Marines. SNM self-reported alcohol abuser.

2 NJPs for underage drinking3 CSACC interventions & was undergoing 4th round of outpatient treatment

Status of the Force:Status of the Force:Recent Fatalities and IssuesRecent Fatalities and Issues

Slide 10

Page 12: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Risks in GarrisonRisks in Garrison

Leader to Led Ratio

Alcohol and Drug Abuse

Psychiatric Medications

ATFP

Legal and Disciplinary Issues

Slide 11

Page 13: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

• Medical

• Legal

• Building resiliency

• Manage RBEs

• ATFP

Mitigation Lines of Operation (LOO)Mitigation Lines of Operation (LOO)

Slide 12

Page 14: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Projects: Medical LOOProjects: Medical LOO

• Staff studies to know our Marines and Sailors better– Medications – cocktail of meds?– Chronic conditions

• Staff study of physical evaluation board/medical board process– Better integrate commander, limited duty

coordinator and medical department representative– Establish OPT with hospital to identify ways to

speed up the system

Slide 13

Page 15: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Projects: Building Resiliency LOOProjects: Building Resiliency LOO

• For Deploying Forces:– Infantry Immersion Trainer– OSCAR– IED Lane Training– Convoy Training– Enhanced Mohave Viper

• For Returning Forces– Wounded Warrior Engagement

Slide 14

Page 16: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Projects: Building Resiliency LOOProjects: Building Resiliency LOO

• On Going Projects:– Stress Inoculation Program

• Stress Inoculation Conference

Slide 15

Page 17: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Projects: Wounded Warrior Projects: Wounded Warrior EngagementEngagement

• The relative isolation of wounded warriors has contributed to fitness, weight, and disciplinary issues among some.

• Address by ensuring Marines remain part of the team

– Return to duty as much as the Marine’s physical condition permits

– If possible, return to the Marine’s original unit for duty, PMEs, and unit events

Slide 16

Page 18: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Projects: Reorganize RBEsProjects: Reorganize RBEs

• Place RBEs under a regimental/group headquarters

• Establish 4 platoons– Legal holds– Medical holds– Marines near EAS/PCS– New joins

Slide 17

Page 19: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Projects: Anti-Terrorism and Force Projects: Anti-Terrorism and Force ProtectionProtection

• I MEF/MCI-WEST Threat Working Group (TWG) meets every two weeks.– Increased information sharing/reporting

between I MEF, MCI-W, NCIS, and San-Diego Regional Terrorist Threat Assessment Center (SD-RTTAC)

• Eagle Eyes– Regionalized approach to suspicious activity

reporting– Training Marines and families what to look for,

and how to report– Advertising campaign through MCI-W and

MCCS

Slide 18

Page 20: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

Projects: Anti-Terrorism and Force Projects: Anti-Terrorism and Force Protection LOOProtection LOO

• Role Players (RP)– I MEF, MCI-W, and NCIS highlighted the

vulnerability posed by RP contractors and we have shaped the policy currently being staffed by PP&O.

• Automated Access Control– I MEF/MCI-W provided the best practices from

our regional solutions and led the development of the requirements for a Marine Corps and potentially DOD-wide solution.

Slide 19

Page 21: FORCE PRESERVATION INGARRISON. Overview Status of the force Risks in garrison Mitigation lines of operation Projects Conclusion Slide 1

ConclusionConclusion

• No surprise – leadership is key to force preservation at every level– critical for at-risk Marines– challenging with low leader-to-led ratio

• Cross-disciplinary approaches are promising– Particularly in building resiliency

Slide 20