Forbes: Six Risks to the Global Art Market in 2014 (5/30/13)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Forbes: Six Risks to the Global Art Market in 2014 (5/30/13)

    1/2

    What would it take to spook the

    global art market? (Image credit:

    Getty Images via @daylife)

    What are the biggest risks to the art market in

    2014? What is the very worst thing that could

    happen and would that send art prices

    plummeting?

    These issues were discussed last week at a

    panel in New York organized by the Art

    Investment Council, founded by the folks at

    Artvest. The discussion focused on unexpected

    events that can and do shake the art market,

    such as a fire or a natural disaster, terrorism,

    fraud or other criminal activity.

    As Jonathan Crystal, principal of insurance

    advisers Crystal & Company, put it, If you

    accept the premise, and many people even in

    this room do not, that art is an asset classthen you should accept the broader premise of

    applying disciplines that are actively used in the investment world. One of

    those disciplines is stress-testing.

    A few of the most interesting points that came up:

    1) A fire or other disaster somewhere with a big concentration of

    art, such as the Geneva or Singapore freeport, could destroy up to

    $100 billion of art in one go. Ron Fiamma, global head of private

    collections for AIGs Private Client Group, estimated that is the value of art

    currently stored in Genevas freeport, although as he said, no one really

    knows. He did say, though, that it was enough for reinsurers to want to avoid

    it. Most wont insure anything going into these facilities anymore because theaggregation values are so high. Any one of these facilities presents a

    tremendous amount of risk.

    2) A dramatic event that affected art prices in one part of the world

    could affect prices everywhere. Stuart Feld, president of New Yorks

    Hirschl & Adler gallery, said that the global breadth of the market should give

    collectors some protection against an implosion. Thats not to say there wont

    be some kind of price correction, but I dont think it should be a disaster. But

    Michael Plummer, co-founder of Artvest, pointed out that the art market is

    based on confidence and is easily spooked. In 1990, you saw it collapse

    INVESTING | 5/30/2013 @ 6:31PM | 1,740 views

    Six Risks To The Global ArtMarket in 2014

    Kathryn Tully, Contributor

    I write about art and investing

    Risks To The Global Art Market in 2014 - Forbes http://www.forbes.com/sites/kathryntully/2013/05/30/six-risks-

    f 2 7/15/13 11

  • 7/28/2019 Forbes: Six Risks to the Global Art Market in 2014 (5/30/13)

    2/2

    virtually overnight. The same happened again in the fall of 2008.

    3) There is a very small group of collectors propping up the top end

    of several parts of the art market. For American Art, I would say that

    there are really three very high-end players, said Feld. If any one of the

    three is interested in a work, that work can bring an unprecedented price. If

    none of the three is interested, the price fetched is completely different. And

    according to Plummer, the family of Helly Nahmad, currently under

    investigation about his alleged connection with a money laundering and

    gambling ring, has single-handedly supported the Impressionist and Modern

    market through all the market downturns of the last 30 years.

    4) In some areas of the market, the withdrawal of one heavyweight

    collector could have a devastating impact. If the Nahmad case goes to

    trial and he has to pay large fine, that could affect his ability to buy, which

    could have a very deleterious impact on the Impressionist and Modern

    market, said Plummer. The contemporary market has a much larger base of

    buyers right now, so I dont think that if any one buyer withdrew there it

    would have the same impact.

    5) Recent allegations ofmoney laundering and fraud in the art

    world may be just the tip of the iceberg, given the secrecy of themarket. Outside the auction market, a lot of private transactions take place

    that are never known about, said Jeremy Kroll, president and CEO of K2

    Intelligence, an investigative and risk analytics consulting firm. People dont

    want to admit they have handled stolen or fake art, but picking through

    remains after a fire, for example, at a major freeport, you would start to peel

    back the layers of the onion. People could be using freeports to minimize tax

    or launder money, you just dont know.

    6) Given the risk of buying fakes or stolen works in the art market,

    buyers need to do a lot more due diligence on the background of

    the work and who is selling it. Thats particularly true now that many

    artist foundations have stopped authenticating art because of the massive

    amounts of money and huge liabilities involved. Otherwise, more people willjust sit on the sidelines, says Plummer. If theres a high concentration of

    buyers that are driving the market, what happens if they step back?

    Which is a very good question. And if its the case that stress testing the top

    end of the art market reveals that it is prone to fraud and money laundering,

    illiquid, opaque and easily spooked, and in some cases, propped up by just a

    few collectors, is this really an asset class at all?

    Follow me on Twitteror find me onFacebook.

    This article is available online at:

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/kathryntully/2013/05/30/six-risks-to-the-global-art-market-

    in-2014/

    Risks To The Global Art Market in 2014 - Forbes http://www.forbes.com/sites/kathryntully/2013/05/30/six-risks-

    f 2 7/15/13 11