8/7/2019 For the Average American This Should Be

1/2

For the average American this should be, beyond contention, the most momentous, andconsequential Supreme Court case ever triedtogether, of course, with the beautifullylucid TD 2313, which implements it. For, they nail down two major points: theunambiguous and unarguable definition of the United States, and the income taxobligations of most Americans due to their relationship to this particular United

States namely, NONE.

It seems almost beyond belief that these two precious documents were ignored by theAmerican taxpayer, at the time. Reading them today, it is indeed unfathomable that theydid not become a watershed event, completely precluding the events that have ensued. Asit happened, however, not much happened until over half a century later. But, since then,many thousands of previous taxpayers have elected out of the system. In section 2 Imentioned where the code permitted this, at 26 USC 6013 (g) Election to treatnonresident alien individual as resident of the United States (4) Termination of election (A) Revocation by taxpayers, which allows a nonresident alien to re-establishhis/her previous status (one time only see subsection 5), after having knowingly or

unknowingly elected to " be treated as a resident of the United States ." (6013 (g)(1).) Inother words, this is an escape hatch to get out of the system that one almost alwaysinadvertently entered, when filing his/her first Form 1040 in order to get a refund, at theage of 14. One thereby declared oneself a resident of the District United States, as well asa U.S. citizen, for tax purposes. But, Section 6013 allows one to revoke this uninformedchoice. I wont go into why such relief must be written into statutory law, but believe me,they wouldnt do it if they didnt need to.

After pondering the matter, I have concluded that it is incumbent upon me to at leastreveal that there is, as I just discovered two weeks ago (this is July, 00) a company thattakes people through this process by writing a minimum of 22 letters! and with results

guaranteed. I spoke with the founder, as well as reading the companys sufficientlyextensive literature which was in absolutely precise agreement with the interpretation inthe instant paper. I found him to be a very knowledgeable, sympathetic, and easygoingindividual, and I have no reason to doubt him when he says that his company hasexperienced over 400 successes, in less than a yearand no failures. After all, whyshould it, it is based on IRC regulations and each individuals true state of affairs?

16. U.S. residents and state Citizens.

In 1957 was published the second volume of an extremely important study, put out by the

federal government: Report of the Interdepartmental Committee for the Study of Jurisdiction over Federal Areas with States. A text of the Law of LegislationJurisdiction. It established, in painstaking detail, that only persons residing within thelegislative jurisdiction of the U.S. Congress are residents of that jurisdiction i.e.,are U.S. residents . It is made exhaustively manifest that this Congress does not extendthe jurisdiction of its legislative umbrella beyond the Constitutionally restrictedboundaries of territories of the United States, "belonging to" its "exclusive sovereignty""in all cases whatsoever," e.g. the federal zone (D.C., the federal States, possessions,

1

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=26&sec=6013http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=26&sec=6013http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=26&sec=6013http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=26&sec=6013

8/7/2019 For the Average American This Should Be

2/2

and enclaves). In other words, the powers of the federal government are limited to andspecifically defined at 1:8:17 of the Constitution, where Congress can:

exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District(not exceeding ten Miles square)[which will] become the Seat of the

Government of the United States, and exercise like Authority over allPlaces purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in whichthe Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards and other needful Buildings...

Of course, today it has got totally out of control, with the U.S. said to "own" over 900,000 square miles of territory in the union states!! (The size of Texas is 267,339square miles.) But, this is another story. Suffice it to say, the fact that it has happeneddoes not make it legal or lawful.

The state Citizen, then, is alien to is not subject to the exclusive jurisdiction and

sovereignty of the territorial United States. Of course the Frenchman who resides heremust pay income tax, but the American state Citizen is almost totally free therefrom. (Iqualify this elsewhere.) Remember Matthew 17, 25-26?

Tell me, Simon, from whom do earthly monarchs collect tribute money?From their own people, or from aliens [others or strangers, in other translations]? From aliens, said Peter. Yes, said Jesus, and their ownpeople are exempt . (KJV. Emphasis added.)

Most Americans are constitutionally exempt just as sovereign state Citizens are exemptfrom State income tax, which is very clearly spelled out in the statutesat least in those

of the California Republicas you will soon see.

Part of the process of restoring my state Citizenship status is revoking my BirthCertificate through a process called REVOCATION OF SIGNATURE AND POWER OF ATTORNEY. If my Birth Certificate is not revoked, then the courts consider me tobe a 14th Amendment federal citizen and my labor and all of my assets are put up ascollateral for the public debt.

When the government communicates with corporations it spells the name of thecorporation in all capital letters. If the government refers to you with your name in all

capital letters, it is actually means to treat you like a corporation. A corporation is createdby government. It has no rights. The government gives it privileges and the corporationmust follow the rules of its creator. I am not a corporation! A state Citizen shouldchallenge the government's assertion that he/she is a corporation. This applies to bothpostal matter and court documents.

2