1
STRATEGIES for ASSESSING Higher-O rDE r Think iNg Create multiple-choice questions using one of the questions from the strategies on the right. 1 Adapt one of the general questions to your content. 3 Provide three or four choices that are plausible and of a similar nature, and one that is clearly the best answer. 4 Provide materials that suit your content: 2 Cartoon Characters Political Cartoon Work of Art Experiment and Results Experimental Design Graph, Data Table, or Chart Text(s) Policy Website Concepts Principles Problem Theory Events Scenarios Advertisement Editorial or Other Persuasive Communication Speech Learn more about the Designing Assessments for Higher-Order Thinking PD Online® course at WWW.ASCD.ORG/HIGHER-ORDER-ASSESSMENTS SOURCE | Adapted from How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom (pp 144-147), by Susan M. Brookhart, Alexandria, VA: ASCD. © 2010 by ASCD. © ASCD 2015. All rights reserved. To identify or evaluate rhetorical and persuasive strategies, ask: » What is the author trying to persuade readers [viewers] to do [think]? » How persuasive would [some aspect] be with [some audience]? » What imagery [or other strategy] is intended to persuade the audience [to do or think something]? To analyze arguments, ask: » What evidence does the author gives that…? » What is the most critical piece of evidence that…? » On what assumptions does this argument rest? To evaluate materials and methods for their intended purposes, ask: » What is the author trying to accomplish? » What elements in the work [accomplish some purpose]? » How well does the author [accomplish some purpose]? To identify issues or problems, ask: » What is the main issue? » What is the problem? To compare and contrast, ask: » Which elements in [text] are like [or not like]? » Ask for a generalization based on similarities or differences. To evaluate the credibility of a source, ask: » Is the information is believable? » Why is the information believable [or not]? To reason with data: » Solve the problem. » Identify the key information for solving the problem. MATERIALS: MATERIALS: MATERIALS: MATERIALS: MATERIALS: MATERIALS: MATERIALS: SUGGESTED STRATEGIES

for Higher-ORDE STRATEGIES Thinking

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: for Higher-ORDE STRATEGIES Thinking

STRATEGIES for ASSESSING

Higher-ORDErThinking

Create multiple-choice questions using one of the questions from the strategies on the right.

1

Adapt one of the general questions to your content. 3Provide three or four choices that are plausible and of a similar nature, and one that is clearly the best answer.

4

Provide materials that suit your content: 2

Cartoon Characters • Political Cartoon • Work of Art

Experiment and Results •

Experimental Design • Graph, Data Table, or Chart

Text(s) • Policy • Website

Concepts • Principles • Problem •

Theory

Events • Scenarios

Advertisement • Editorial or Other Persuasive Communication • Speech

Learn more about the Designing Assessments for Higher-Order Thinking PD Online® course at

WWW.ASCD.ORG/HIGHER-ORDER-ASSESSMENTS

SOURCE | Adapted from How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom (pp 144-147), by Susan M. Brookhart, Alexandria, VA: ASCD. © 2010 by ASCD.

© ASCD 2015. All rights reserved.

To identify or evaluate rhetorical and persuasive strategies, ask: » What is the author trying to persuade readers [viewers] to do [think]?

» How persuasive would [some aspect] be with [some audience]?

» What imagery [or other strategy] is intended to persuade the audience [to do or think something]?

To analyze arguments, ask: » What evidence does the author gives that…?

» What is the most critical piece of evidence that…?

» On what assumptions does this argument rest?

To evaluate materials and methods for their intended purposes, ask: » What is the author trying to accomplish?

» What elements in the work [accomplish some purpose]?

» How well does the author [accomplish some purpose]?

To identify issues or problems, ask: » What is the main issue?

» What is the problem?

To compare and contrast, ask: » Which elements in [text] are like [or not like]?

» Ask for a generalization based on similarities or differences.

To evaluate the credibility of a source, ask: » Is the information is believable?

» Why is the information believable [or not]?

To reason with data: » Solve the problem.

» Identify the key information for solving the problem.

MATERIALS:

MATERIALS:

MATERIALS:

MATERIALS:

MATERIALS:

MATERIALS:

MATERIALS:

SUGGESTED STRATEGIES