1
FOOTNOTE GUIDE REFER TO 1. G.R. No. 125706 – CHINA CHANG JIANG ENERGY CORPORATION (PHILIPPINES) versus ROSAL INFRASTRUCTURE BUILDERS, represented by its General Manager, ALBERTO S. SURLA, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ARBITRATION COMMISSION, PRUDENCIO F. BARANDA, and the COURT OF APPEALS See Annex A 2. Reference to the case of China Chang Jiang See Annex A 3. G.R. No. 207264 REGINA ONGSIAKO REYES, vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS and JOSEPH SOCORRO B. TAN, See Annex B 4. Moses, M. L., The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (2012),2 nd Ed., p. 6 See Annex C 5. Supra Note 4-5 See Annex C 6. Greenberg, et al. International Commercial Arbitration – An Asia-Pacific Perspective (2010). First Ed. Par. 4.36, p. 155. See Annex D 7. Id at Par. 4.47, p. 158. See Annex D 8. GR NO. 161957- Jorge Gonzales and Panel of Arbitrators vs Austria-Martinez January 22, 2007 See Annex E 9. Supra note 19 at Par. 4.50, p. 159. See Annex D 10. Supra note 22 at Par. 4.50, pp. 159-160 See Annex D 11. Belohlavek, Importance of the Seat of Arbitration in International Arbitration: Delocalization and Denationalization of Arbitration as an Outdated Myth, 31 ASA BULLETIN 2/2013 (JUNE), at p. 263. See Annex F 12. Definition of kompetenz-kompetenz p13 See Annex G 13. Greenberg, et al. International Commercial Arbitration – An Asia-Pacific Perspective (2010). First Ed. Par. 5.46, p. 214. Supra note at p. 91. See Annex D

Footnote Guide

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

RR

Citation preview

Page 1: Footnote Guide

FOOTNOTE GUIDE REFER TO1. G.R. No. 125706 – CHINA CHANG JIANG ENERGY CORPORATION (PHILIPPINES) versus ROSAL INFRASTRUCTURE BUILDERS, represented by its General Manager, ALBERTO S. SURLA, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ARBITRATION COMMISSION, PRUDENCIO F. BARANDA, and the COURT OF APPEALS

See Annex A

2. Reference to the case of China Chang Jiang See Annex A3. G.R. No. 207264  REGINA ONGSIAKO REYES, vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS and JOSEPH SOCORRO B. TAN,

See Annex B

4. Moses, M. L., The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (2012),2nd Ed., p. 6

See Annex C

5. Supra Note 4-5 See Annex C6. Greenberg, et al. International Commercial Arbitration – An Asia-Pacific Perspective (2010). First Ed. Par. 4.36, p. 155.

See Annex D

7. Id at Par. 4.47, p. 158. See Annex D8. GR NO. 161957- Jorge Gonzales and Panel of Arbitrators vs Austria-Martinez January 22, 2007

See Annex E

9. Supra note 19 at Par. 4.50, p. 159. See Annex D10. Supra note 22 at Par. 4.50, pp. 159-160 See Annex D11. Belohlavek, Importance of the Seat of Arbitration in International Arbitration: Delocalization and Denationalization of Arbitration as an Outdated Myth, 31 ASA BULLETIN 2/2013 (JUNE), at p. 263.

See Annex F

12. Definition of kompetenz-kompetenz p13 See Annex G13. Greenberg, et al. International Commercial Arbitration – An Asia-Pacific Perspective (2010). First Ed. Par. 5.46, p. 214. Supra note at p. 91.

See Annex D