Upload
truongduong
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
1
Participant Observation
Jana Rückert-John
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
2
William F. Whyte “Street Corner Society”Participant observation – a first definitionEthnography and observationsWhen to use observationsAdvantages and disadvantages of participant observationParticipant observation problems How to do a participant observation?
Agenda
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
3
William Foote Whyte – Pioneer in participant observation (1914-2000)
“Street Corner Society. The social structure of an Italian slum” (1943)
AimsThe studyResultsSpecial features of the studyCriticism
First Examples
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
4
Participant observation is a method of data collection that attempts to understand the motives and meanings involved in people’s behaviour from the point of view of the participant.
“Naturalistic” methodInteractionist perspective
Definition
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
5
Social scientists do something extra with their observation: They write ethnographies
‘ethno’ means ‘folk’‘graph’ derives from ‘writing’
The pioneers of ethnography were anthropologists (19th century)
Ethnography and Observation
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
6
1. Studies of tribesMalinowski (1922): Trobriand Islanders in the Western PacificMary Douglas’s (1951-1963) work on a central African tribe
2. Studies of subcultures“Chicago School” (1930s) – Robert Park, Ernest Burgess
3. Studies of the public realmGoffman’s (1950s) study of the Shetland Islanders
4. Studies of organisationsGoffman’s (1961) book Asylum
The Ethnographic Focus
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
7
1. “Seeing through the eyes of people being studied”
2. Description of mundane details3. Contextualism: social and historical
context4. Process of social life5. Flexible research designs6. Avoiding early use of theories and
concepts
Aims of observational research
Source: Bryman, A. 2004
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
8
Types of information for which observations are a good sourceSettingHuman, social environmentNonverbal communicationNative languageNotable non-occurrences
When to use observations
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
9
Two kinds of research setting:1. ‘closed’ or ‘private’ settings2. ‘open’ or ‘public’ settingsTwo kind of research access:1. Overt – participants aware of researcher’s
intensions2. Covert –researcher’s identity not disclosed
Most ethnography is overtBut blurred boundary between overt and covert roles
Gaining Access
What is my identity in the field?
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
10
The roles of observer
Full participant and identificationFull participation, no possibility for scientifically detached observation
Participant as observerPrimary participant, secondary observer (“going native”)
Observer as participantMissing identification
Outside observer or spectatorGive up the role of participant Problem of misunderstanding
Role conflict of the researcher between ‘Participant’ and ‘Observer’
Source: Gold, R. L. (1958)
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
11
The covert role of observer
AdvantagesObviates the need to negotiate accessReactivity is not a problem
DisadvantagesPractical difficulties in taking notesCannot use other methodsAnxiety about ‘blowing your cover’Ethical problems (deception)
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
12
Access to closed settings (overt role)
negotiating access requires “strategic planning, hard work and dumb luck” (Van Maanen & Kolb, 1985: 11)
use friends, colleagues and contacts to help youget support from ‘sponsors’ within the groupgain clearance from higher level ‘gatekeepers’offer something in return (e.g. a report)be clear and honest about your aims and methods
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
13
Access to open settings (overt role)
Problem: hostility and distrust from members are possible Key informants (sponsor/gatekeeper)
e.g. Whyte (1981) ‘Doc’
‘Hanging around’ – practice a normal behaviour
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
14
Try not to influence the field by your observationObserve correctly and perceive in an undistorted mannerBehave so, that a further observation is possible (no exclusion) Preserve your acceptance in the observation field Practice an ordinary (normal) behaviour: a mix of conformity and nonconformity
Behaviour of the observer
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
15
Advantages of participant observation
A rich source of high-quality informationResearcher can understand the social pressures / influences / group norms Flexible approach, researcher does not pre-judge the issueFormulate and test hypothesesResearch produces a depth of detailed information
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
16
Disadvantages of participant observation
Researcher has to learn the culture of a group. It is not always easy or possible.Restricted to small-scale studies; carried out over a long time periodNo representativeness and generalisationProblems of access to all levels of a groupGreat deal of skill and commitment from the researcher
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
17
Write down notes as soon as possible after events (memory protocols)Write up full notes at the end of every day (“field diary”)
Detailed descriptionsGradually narrow your focus
Dictaphone can be less obtrusiveTypes of field notes
Mental notesWritten notes
Recording observational data
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
18
Example: Organic supermarkets
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
19
Students project: participant observation in organic supermarkets
Context of the projectResearch questionResearch process
Development of an observation scheduleCarry out the observationAnalysing and results
Example: Organic supermarkets
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
20
Observation field:The location, the social space of observation
Organic and conventional supermarkets
Observation units:are social situations or in general objects of the observation
Observation field, notice ability of the store, presentations of products, quality and quantity of products, clients
Observation schedule:Is the plan, which says what, how and where will be observed by the observer
See extra paper!
Example: Organic supermarkets
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
21
Recording observationsDo not use electronic recording equipment!Field notes:
Simulation of a small shopping list for the notesWrite down notes as soon as possible after events
AnalysingIntra-case analysisCross-case analysis (based on rating scales)
Example: Organic supermarkets
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
22
Observation fieldAppearance of the storeQuality of productsPresentation of productsClients
Some results of the study
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
23
Disadvantages and advantages of the study
It’s more a structured observation.The potential of a qualitative observation was not exploited.
But: The study generated some interesting questions for further research.
Rural Sociology with Gender
Studies
430C
Qu
alit
ativ
e R
esea
rch
Met
hod
s
24
Bryman, A. (2004): Social Research Methods. Second Edition. Oxford University Press. Chapter 14.Whyte, W. (1981): Street Corner Society. Third Edition. University of Chicago Press.Silverman, D. (2001): Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. Second Edition. Sage Publications. Chapter 3.Gold, R. L. (1958): Roles in Sociological Fieldwork, Social Forces, 36: 217-223. Malinowski, B. (1922): Argonauts of the Western Pacific.Douglas, M. (1963): The Lele of Kasai. London: Oxford University Press. Park, R.; McKenzie, R. D.; Burgess, E. (1925): The City: Suggestions for the Study of Human Nature in the Urban Environment. University of Chicago Press. Goffman, E. (1953): Communication conduct in an island community. Goffman, E. (1956): The presentation of self in everyday life. University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre. (dt. Wir alle spielen Theater)Goffman, E. (1961): Asylums. Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York, Doubleday.Van Maanen, J.; Kolb, D. (1985): ‘The Professional Apprentice: Observations on Fieldwork Roles in two Organisational Settings’, Research in the Sociology of Organisations, 4: 1-33.Giulianotti, R. (1995): ‘Participant Observation and Research into Football Hooliganism: Reflections on the Problems of Entrée and Everyday Risks’, Sociology of Sport Journal, 12: 1-20.
Literature