14
FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING

RES VS SAMPLE NO.

Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

Page 2: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING2Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

3BPM res – jitRun26_0dB_030• End of the final shift• High-beta optics• Charge 0.3 x 1010

• C-band filters

Page 3: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING3Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

Resolution vs sample number - jitRun26_0dB_030

Best geometric: 0.120 +/- 0.004 um at sample number 63(Outside central region, resolution explodes and waveform shape at minimum is not visible)

Page 4: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING4Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

Resolution vs sample number - jitRun26_0dB_030

Best geometric: 0.120 +/- 0.004 um at sample number 63(Plotted region around minimum resolution)

Page 5: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING5Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

3BPM res – resol_0dB_8_FB_off• December 2014• High-beta optics• Charge 0.4 x 1010

• 714 MHz BPF on second stage electronics

Page 6: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING6Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

Resolution vs sample number - resol_0dB_8_FB_off

Best geometric: 0.051 +/- 0.001 um at sample number 61(Outside central region, resolution explodes and waveform shape at minimum is not visible)

Page 7: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING7Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

Resolution vs sample number - resol_0dB_8_FB_off

Best geometric: 0.051 +/- 0.001 um at sample number 61(Plotted region around minimum resolution)

Page 8: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING8

APPENDIXWaveforms and calibrations for two data sets

Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

Page 9: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING9Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

AY Mover Scan - jitRun26_0dB_030

Page 10: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING10Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

BY Mover Scan - jitRun26_0dB_030

Page 11: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING11Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

CY Mover Scan - jitRun26_0dB_030

Page 12: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING12Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

AY Mover Scan - IPB_0dB_recheck_cal

Page 13: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING13Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

BY Mover Scan - IPB_0dB_recheck_cal

Page 14: FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

FONT GROUP MEETING14Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015

CY Mover Scan - IPC_0dB_recheck_cal