183
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date

  • Upload
    dothu

  • View
    242

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

'~- -

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No. 190129114MARC VIIAL-HERNE,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTKAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.

Plaintiff,

Defendants.

-against-

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ASBEKA INDUSTRIES OF NEW YORK, et al.,

NYCALLA.S. Part~S()fFI8it18f, J~-------------------....--;o

z>­enz-

WHEREFORE, defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., with

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

- CI\/IL

-----;:~-_ .._-LS(G

OCl4 _;:1

Audrey P. Raphael, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffMarc Vital-HerneLEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

ustin M. Kasmir, Esq.Attorney for DefendantKaiser Gypsum Company, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300File No. 29510.12460

f ~~~~ Rietul!ei::===I0/'5;jt5~\ I. r:r:\G~ S?-.y;.S 0 'RON.PETERH. MOULTON

.4M.~~3\d~~1{ O?-.'f--CO\J\'" ~S~~

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

~.>­(/)z-

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton)

----------_._----------~

ROGER W. SAHM,Index No. 190174/2015

Plaintiff,

-against-

AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC.,n/k/a RHONE POULENC AG COMPANY,n/k/a BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC., et ai.,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTKAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., with

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

, CIVILNYS

~ ~/OI15!/:J-(Hon. Peter H. Moulton

SO ORDERED

prejudice and without costs.

defendant KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

f\ LEDOC1 'L b 20'5

Dated: Ne";~lo~k, New York--1--L-~J~-- COUNT'< Cl;;}.KKUOflflCE

~;;:r }~ N~~~t~~ _Attorney for Defendant Attorney for PlaintiffKaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. Roger SahmLEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.77 Water Street, 21 st Floor 700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10005 New York, New York 1000 _(212) 232-1300 (212) 558-5500 Ur()?r~C~ ---r-~-----File No. 29510.1479 U L!::oCJ

4838-5648-6440.1

XiCLBI5963I.llegaIlNOSJMlaprIl20J5

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK•••••••• .~_~-~__~_ft • __••• • __••__~--)(

HERMAN ROM and ERlKA HOM,

Plaintiff(s),

- against·

AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., et at.;

Defendants.- ~....w._..•._.. * ft Wft ••••__){

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Index No.: 190101/14

NYCALI.A.S. Part~ ~O

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEA VER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEA VER.BROOKS, INC. ,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Carmen 81. eorge, q.Attomey for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

'Q~

\~ t~~-( t\) ov~-

~~\ +.S ,---->.,,;~~.,pt_-----C)v~0 O~~hawnette luitt, Esq.

~~-0...\~~-{ Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.cP '" Barry McTiernan & Moore

2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED, ~~ ~~iJein II itlcr

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGAnON

INDEX NO.: 190301-2013JOSEPH WENK, as Administrator for the Estate ofCAROL WENK, and JOSEPH WENK, Individually,

Plaintiffs-vs. -

AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., et al.Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant, Malvese Equipment Co., Inc., by and through its attorneys,

Rawle & Henderson LLP, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212 dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Malvese

Equipment Co., Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Malvese Equipment Co., Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs. ~

Dated: New York, New York " ~ ~ _x.July 20, 2015 ~~ , V ...~~ 0<';'</'.'.)

WEITZ~~EN~~ER6,P.C., ~0 \, \.,-<5? ~

By:~ - _ ~~-<:'-~x.~~Y-1l----',-----,c....=:---I+----+Charles Fetguso (vO Robert A. FitchAdam Cooper ~ John C. McMeekin IIAttorneys for Plaintiff ...."-.. Attorneys for Defendant,700 Broadway Malvese Equipment Co., Inc.New York, New York 10003 14 Wall Street

2th FloorNew York, New York 10005One South Penn SquareWidener Bldg.

~ . Philadelphia, PA 07

SO ORDERED,~ ~JI C;;I'/~~ fRlfC'::r00fC:O '':_

~.PEI'ERH.M~U1.TON LS ~L~~0W~J/l]OCT 142015

8485696-1

X:acl58435.llegaIlNOSJM

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------)(

BEVERLY TARANTINO and RALPH TARANTINO,

Plaintiff(s),

- against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CORP., et al.;

Defendants.

-----------------------------------------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Index No.: 190143/13

NYCALLA.S. Part yJ E;o

WHEREFORE, defendants ASBESTOS CORPORATIONLTD. Hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants ASBESTOS CORPORATIONLTD. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants ASBESTOS CORPORATIONLTD. ,be and the same are hereby dismissed with

f\/\ 'l~r \ \~"~ tQ "----e.I' , gl{j ~Y¥-4AH;;ret:, Esq. hasR~I' IIe~, Esq.·-~tlt-n Kle i .'1 ~""-kl n(Alk\.. Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Asbestos Corporation Ltd.

Napoli, Bern, Ripka & Associates , ~ Barry McTiernan & Moore350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7413 '(~ 2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10118 \\?~ ~ ('~ New York, New York 10006

G "~ 1.\)·~\c,~212)313-3600~ ('\ l- ,.0""

\)'v <:-Y~c:.S~:0 c,\..v'{O~

Cp'0~ ~«;.~

SO ORDERED, .JM;.~ £:-HeIller ¥sj;snON. PEfERH.MOULTON

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------Je

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION------------------------------------------------------------------JeThis Document Relates To:

BEVERLY TARANTINO and RALPHTARANTINO,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, et al.,

NYCALI.A.S. Part~.sc,

_ (IlQIl. ~h8lTY K.1eill Heitler)

IndeJe No.: 190143-13

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Defendants.------------------------------------------------------------------Je

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE co. without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed without prejudice and without

costs.

Dated:~~ aols­~ewYOrk'

MICHAEL COHAN, Esq.Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik & Associates, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)350 Fifth Avenue, #7413New York, NY 10118(212) 267-3700

SO ORDERED,

tION.PEfERH.MOULTO~·

J:'Ii.c OCr ~D

-..LJ .. J OU!ViyC 2G20/5-----,~:::..-7V\.LVJ----=----:..irJ;;Hlf!..,E:Ii/f'SKirst Alford Kneis, Esq. YOIi/f O;::/:"/CI:-K& GATES LLP "A orneys for Defendant

RANECO.599 LeJeington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK_____________________ x

IN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL

_____________________ x

THERESA SIWA, as Executrix for the Estate of NELSON A.SIWA, and THERESA SIWA, Individually,

Plaintiffs,-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as successor-by­merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. et al. including

ROPER PUMP COMPANY,

Defendants._____________________ x

Index No. 190025-2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT AS AGAINST DEFENDANT

ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

WHEREFORE, defendant ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (sued herein as "Roper Pump Company")

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

eWYOrk'NewEr~ ~ /:*I'---- ~,,~~'" 00- { ~ ,0-

A~bre ;andis, Esq. 'C'~ .f.J-:~tepheflOVakidiS:Esq. COUll; r <0 aWeitz & Luxenberg, P.c. LI (;- <v~ O«1VJalaby & Bradley, LLC 7yCz '0/5Attorneys for Plaintiffs "' c::s vv~~ Attorneys for Roper Technologies, 11iff2v-v f,/flf's700 Broadway i:.:-~ ~«; 150 Broadway, Suite 600 O/flf O;::fjCE;New York, New York 10003 0..::5 New York, NY 10038

G

SO ORDERED, ~~/ ~ Dated: --''--I-L.......::jH=-.J---+--C-~~eterH. Moulton "

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton P.)

Index No: 19047912013

ROBERT J. CROSBY and SAHARA CROSBY NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

~,2015FILE D

r..~ O~J 26 2015NTYCLER I

NEW YO~~OFFICE

Jonat n B. Kromberg, Esq.DA GER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

;\/\i ,1 '"/ 1 "'---', 'L/ Iv;

Adm:t €oop~, Esq. fW'(\'()((,{Or~WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. ~ .Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,~

~'-= ---------~~H6'rLetefH. Moulton /

!i~,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ROBERT J. CROSBY and SAHARA CROSBY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 19047912013

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Ottrrlatr 5 ,2015

brc W'\tVS.WEITZ . LUXENBERG, P.e. 2% .Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

. Kfomberg, Esq.DAR ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

l '::';-~ ..-.----~.,...

-~"~l

II.------._---J

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190310/14In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

JAMES DEABOLD,

- against-

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et aI.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

Jordan D.SEGASING & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

4(~-~ej;d/~-IBCSGiy KiclIl tleitlcr = . 7I

MON. PEfERH. MOULTON

SO ORDERED,

Dated:~, 2015New York, New York

. bre Br ndis, Esq.WEITZ &'LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------xJAMES DEABOLD, Index No.: 190310114

Plaintiff,-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et. aI.,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

LA.S. Part '% 5"6Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, GARDNER DENVER, INC. hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC., with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all Co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs to either party.

Dated: ewYork,NewYork ~

/l. ,.;wI'S -_~~~ __L,l-c..J ./~ --

Ambre BtandiS, Esq Kevin W. Turbert, Esq.WEITZ MLUXENBERG, P.C. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGERAttorneys for Plaintiff & MAHONEY, LTD.700 Broadway Attorneys for DefendantNew York, New York 10003 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100(212)558-5500 New York, New York 10022

/p (212) 651-7500 1SO ORDERED, 7L#-A-"'-/----------~-. I{)//~ /S

o Hon. ~r H, Moulton /

F' LEDOCT 26 2015 !

ICOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE;'

NEW YORK' "'_-.. _.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-------------------xINRE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL

-------------------xJAMES DEABOLD, Index No. 190310/2014

Plaintiff,

-v.-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et ai.,including VIKING PUMP, INC.,

Defendants.

-------------------x

WHEREFORE, defendant Viking Pump, Inc. ("Viking") hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Viking with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

ok, New York

---=---ct'---+-''----=!o..L-'--,'S=--, 2015

~

Dated:

defendant Viking be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

F I LEDOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SO ORDERED £- ­'.IHOIl. Peter H. Moulton

Grace De Mario, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for DefendantViking Pump Inc.(212) 791-0285

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK_____________________ x

IN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A. S. Part 50

(Moulton, P.)_____________________ x

JAMES DEABOLD, Index No. 190310-2014

Plaintiff,

-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aI.,

Defendants._____________________ x

WHEREFORE, defendant BLACKMER hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

BLACKMER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

BLACKMER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

A bre B andis, Esq.Weitz & /uxenberg, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Fit EDOCT 26 2015

DeMario, Esq.Mala y & Bradley, LLC

Attorneys for Blackmer150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038

N.e~Ye.rk~~~~~Yorkol/f1) lJ.ttf 5, dJ) 15t=lr---···

Dated:

SO ORDERED, _...,.g<--~,.~I:,---4...:....~~-,- -_-_-_~~~-_~_I Hon. Peter HMoulton

Dated:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------------------------------------------------------------J(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION------------------------------------------------------------------------J(OLIVER S. MCCLEAN and HELGA MCCLEAN, Index No.: 190154114

NO OPPOSITIONPlaintiffs, SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION- against -

AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., et. aI,LA.S. Part % f:"oHon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.------------------------------------------------------------------------J(

WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER

DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant

GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

Dated: ..DciDOOr- 5 2015New York, New York

sha S. a ani, Esq... EGAL cCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantGardner Denver, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500 iI'"a =- .J2jdsj;

l on. Peter Moulton' 7' /;

(........~..; ..

SO ORDERED,

A.tJorneys for PlaintiffWEITZ & LUJ(ENBERG, PC700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

(\ V--tiiJ. e randis, Esq.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-------------------------------------------------------------~----------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION------------------------------------------------------------------------)(ROBERT CASTERELLA, Index No.: 190133115

Plaintiff,

- against -

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

MANNINGTON MILLS, INC. et aI., LA.S. Part}d '5uHon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

WHEREFORE, Defendant MANNINGTON MILLS, INC. (hereinafter

"MANNINGTON MILLS"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

Defendant MANNINGTON MILLS, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, MANNINGTON MILLS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

FI Le 0OCT 26 2015

COUNTy CLER I

NEW YO~~OFFICE

Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantMannington Mills, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, -...:..../?:-H-on-..L"7-e-te-r-H-.-M-O-ul-to-n--- sJ--~ _/--~-.

'. '-~,..-_ .....~_ 1-

-_._.-:.~

Dated: 10/ I~ 2015New York, New York

without costs to either party.

Sam Mei 1tZ, E. .MEIROWITZ & W SSERBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff233 Broadway, Suite 950New York, New York 10279(212) 897-1988

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

- -------------------------------------------------------------------- )(

In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

- -------------------------------------------------------------------- )(

This Document Relates To:

NYCALLA.S. Pm1 50(Moulton, ~

Index No.: 190397-14

VENETIA KONTOGURIS, as Administratrix for theEstate of ZORAN DJOKIC, and VENETIAKONTOGOURIS, Individually,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Plaintiffs,

- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, CO.,;ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.

Defendants.

-- ------------------------------------------------------------------- )(

OCT 142015SO ORDERED, --4-L---= -------------__-L(01/ s;IS

Hon. Peter H. Moulton, lS.C. I

WHEREFORE, defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., by its attomeys

Harris Beach PLLC, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

against defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNA1IONAL, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed

with prejudice and without costs. QDated: Ic;/o;!1 L ~

New York, New York ,,~~ '..;/1

-----""""({2=--.L-..>.--~Uf~,___l=_7J----'I~~,~~ '\."~£.'0o'<'<\I!JJ1 Jj/A j fi____Danny R.£,/~2f' ~~ G\..S~O"'*'Robert A. SChaeJ:,~r:ESq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e. ~-<0v.~:~ HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttomeys for Plaintiff Cp\J Attomeys For Defendant700 Broadway Armstrong Intemational, Inc.New York, NY 10003 100 Wall Street, 23 rd Floor

New York, NY 10~)~ !c~) ·~C~~~-,~ ..J UIS i ';C:cJ II i,!/ r---- 2 r>,

-- '-::j L,= U \j LS i1))

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------xIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL

---------------------xLEONARD F. CARPENTER, JR. and BEVERLYCARPENTER,

Index No. 190332/2013

Plaintiffs,

-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COR., et al.,including SEARS, ROEBUCK and CO.,

Defendants.

---------------------xWHEREFORE, defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co., hereby request summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Sears, Roebuck and Co. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: ~ewYork, New York

\..clD bet 5 2015

(L(~e Mario, Esq.

MAL BY & BRADLEY, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for DefendantSears, Roebuck and Co.

(212) 791-0285~'

l

IifDated:

-~f--!---='f----=-----+--

SO ORDERED, 4....ccA~r _Yhon.Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------------------------------------------------------xMARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate ofPATRICK T. SLEVIN,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.W. CHESTERTON CO., INC., et al.,

Index No.: 190406-10

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, Defendant, Alfa Laval Inc" incorrectly sued as Alfa Laval Inc.,

Individually and as successor by merger with The Sharples Company (hereinafter "ALFA

LAVAL"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant ALFA

LAVAL with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant ALFA LAVAL be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

D~_,y_:~;_?_,. _Nicholas E. Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022Attorneys for Plaintiff.<;

~c~~~ 12 DCOUN?y t 6 2015

c:..... --/vCL£AKChri;t-;pher f:1;;;~~:Esq, £v.'YOi///;;F"r:IC~KELLEY JASONS MCGOWANSPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLP120 Wall Street, 30th FloorNew York, New York 10005Attorneys for Defendant Alfa Laval Inc.

SOORDERE~? ~O/d/ IjSI<On:Peter H. Mouj-to~-" / / )

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------------------------------------------------------xEVELYN B. SMITH, Individually and as PersonalRepresentative of the Estate of JAMES RICHARDSMITH, Index No.: 190115-10

Plaintiffs,

-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

AW. CHESTERTON CO" INC" et al.,

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, Defendant, FMC Corporation on behalf of its former Peerless Pumps

(hereinafter "FMC"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant

FMC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant FMC be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Flt~EDOCT 26 2015

Dated: New York, New Yark. _ 5

Nic -... s-"'-~Novack, Esq. -_.......__ ..

LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022Attorneys for Plaintiffs

------".,.",,'.. ,,-------Christopher Hannan, Esq.KELLEY JASONS MCGOWANSPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLP120 Wall Street, 30th FloorNew York, New York 10005Attorneys for Defendant FMC Corporation

SO ORDERED',ifoT1;'~:;~oo~-p/~J If;'

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------------------------------------------------------xMARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate ofPATRICK T. SLEVIN, Index No.: 190406-10

Plaintiffs,

-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

AW. CHESTERTON CO., INC., et al.,

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, Defendant, FMC Corporation on behalf of its former Peerless Pump

and Northern Pump businesses, improperly sued as FMC Corporation on behalf of its former

Peerless Pumps and its former Northern Pump (hereinafter "FMC"), hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant FMC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant FMC be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

e::::.:::--'------------_ - - _-Christopher IIannan, Esq.KELLEY JASONS MCGOWANSPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLP120 Wall Street, 30th FloorNew York, New York 10005Attorneys for Defendant FMC Corporation

SOORDERED,~~~=~._ /V/9/ I/S F I LEDtft0n. Peter H. Moulton I ! I

OCT 26 2015COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

N'cholas E. Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------xCYNTHIA MAGILL, Individually and asAdministratrix to the Estate of OTIS CORTHELL,

Plaintiffs,Index No.: 190214-09

-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, Defendant, FMC Corporation on behalf of its former Northern Pump

business, improperly sued as FMC Corporation (hereinafter "FMC"), hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant FMC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant FMC be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Christopher Hannan, Esq.KELLEY JASONS MCGOWANSPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLP120 Wall Street, 30th FloorNew York, New York 10005Attorneys for Defendant FMC Corporation

SO ORDERED,/~-.............. "')/ 11-H~. Peter H. Moult~n .. . ... .. ..1/ d-! 1'0

ic . Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------xGENNARO AZZARONE, as Administrator of theEstate of NICOLA AZZARONE, deceased,

Index No.: 190137-10Plaintiffs,

-against-

ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCTLIABILITY TRUST; et al.,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.-------------------------------------------------------------------x

WHEREFORE, Defendant, FMC Corporation on behalf of its former Peerless Pumps

(hereinafter "FMC"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Defendant

FMC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant FMC be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, ,-==- 5

Nic '. ovack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022Attorneys for Plaintiffs

--------",-,--""__0' -

Christopher Hannan, Esq.KELLEY JASONS MCGOWANSPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLP120 Wall Street, 30th FloorNew York, New York 10005Attorneys for Defendant FMC Corporation

SO ORDERED, __" ,"I .-==:::_===HOl).,Petef1I. Moulton

FII_EDOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------xGENNARO AZZARONE, as Administrator of theEstate of NICOLA AZZARONE, deceased,

Index No.: 190137-10Plaintiffs,

-against-

ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCTLIABILITY TRUST; et al.,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, Defendant, Sterling Fluid Systems (USA), LLC, formerly known as

Peerless Pump Company (hereinafter "STERLING"), hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant STERLING with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant STERLING be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Nicholas E. Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SOORDERED,~ _Hon. Peter H. Moulton

/' -­_--..::::~==----Christopher Hannan, Esq.KELLEY JASONS MCGOWANSPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLP120 Wall Street, 30th FloorNew York, New York 10005Attorneys for Defendant Sterling FluidSystems (USA), LLC

F I to;OCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERI<'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------------------------------xIN RE: NYC ASBESTOS LITIGATION------------------------------------------XERNEST GILBERT,

Plaintiff,

-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION,as successor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.,

Index No.:190198/15

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

lAS Justice:Hon. Peter Moulton

Defendants.------------------------------------------X

WHEREFORE, defendant, VOLVO PENTA MARINE PRODUCTS, L.L.C.,

("VPMP"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant VPMP, with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and

cross claims against defendant VPMP, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Port Washington, New York

-1---------Lance Perez, Esq.MAIMONE & ASSOCIAT S PLLCAttorneys for DefendantMack Trucks, Inc.150 Haven AvenuePort Washington, New York 11050(516) 390-9595

--_._-----

Christopher Romanelli, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, RECEIVEDNYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-IST JD

OCT 1 9 2015

OCT 26 2015 HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

COUNTY CLEf-X'_: Dr-FICENEW YOF{K

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------------xIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:

NYCALLA.S. part( 5" Uq.IeitlCI, J.

Index No: 101607/07

Debra M. Reis, Individually and as Executrix of the Estateof George A. Reis, Jr.

-----------------------------------------x

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant PUGET SOUND COMMERCE CENTER INC., herebyrequests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant PUGET SOUNDCOMMERCE CENTER INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

OCT 19 2015

RECEIVEDNYS SUPREMI! CT-CIVIL-1ST JD

Virginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantPUGET SOUND COMMERCECENTER INC.150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No. 04693.00323

Dated:

Jordan Fox E .BELLUCK:Attorney fo laint'546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor G QNew York, NY 10036 ,\"'V

~ \ ~l.%1,~~ ~\G~~~\ 'f.-S O~

:0 G'.--~~o?-~Cp0~ ~~~

SO ORDERED, ~K.I1eitl~ N/d0 S

HON.PETERH.MOULTONHON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

7050460v.\

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK----------------------------------------- xIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

----------------------------------------- xThis Document Relates To:

Gail Buckheit, as Executrix of the Estate of Peter Pacifico,

----------------------------------------- x

NYCALLA.S. Part~(Moulton)

Index No: 101665/06

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upo otice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER C~,.Jl.I'JRATION,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

V rginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, New York 10017File No. 10557.00762

SOORDERED,_----,.L-LL__======-=--=----=--=---_~-j{)J::2IJ/-)r------­H6n. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.c. !

RECEIVEDF I LED NYS SUPREMe CT-CIVIL-IST JD

OCT t. 6 2015 OCT 1 9 2015

7041298v.l

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------------xIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:

NYCALLA.S. Partt 50{Heider, J.

Index No: 101607/07

Debra M. Reis, Individually and as Executrix of the Estateof George A. Reis, Jr.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

----------------------------------------- x

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

irginia Squitieri, Esq.ILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,

EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No.1 0557.00240

Dated:

Jordan Fox, EsBELLUCK & F X,Attorney for Plai tif546 Fifth Avenue, t FloorNew York, NY 100 0

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CAR ER CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without co ts

SO ORDERED, _-----==--- -_~_=:~(0/;;)lIS-Hon. Sherry K. IIeitlet /HON. PErERH. MOULTON

RECEIVEDNYS SUPREM~ CT-CIVIL-1ST JD

OCT 1 9 2015

HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

5905751 v.1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(NORBERT 1. SANCHEZ and LAURIE A. SANCHEZ,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

ALLIED AVIATION SEVICES, INC, et aI.,

Defendants.

Index No. 190233/2015

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(

WHEREFORE, defendant THE BOEING COMPANY, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant THE BOEING COMPANY, with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

THE BOEING COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts to

either party.

Dated: New York, New YorkOctober 15, 2015

\~ \

". I

\).-~.c:!--'~ ~~

.~... - \ \,.. v'\.~~ .S .::::o~j;'s~iMOSKOWITZ,

" ~ . ~\\0 EDELMAN & DICKER LLPr\\. .~O ~'d~v y.,(:..'J Attorney lor Defen ant

G'v'?--{O~'f-. THE BOEING COMPANY':0~"0~<v~ 150 East 42"<1 Street

cP New York. New York 10017Our File No. 07040.00046

SO ORDERED, /? Ii)I;) J/ / ~HON. PETER H. MOULTON, l.S.C. RECEIVED

NYS SUPREMI! CT-CIVIL-1ST JD

OCT 19 2015

HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------------xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

----------------------------------------- xThis Document Relates To:

Joseph Barry Best and Marie Grace Best

----------------------------------------- x

NYCALLA.S. Part ':c(Moulton)

Index No: 190109114

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

Dated: /olJr/Js-New York, NY

Mark Bibro, EsqThe Early Law FirmAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10017

~~, ~ieri' Esq.

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42Jld StreetNew York, NY 10017File No.: 10557.01572

SO ORDERED, t(~-----~Q/~I/L';Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. r

6142869v.l

RECEIVEDNYS SUPREMe CT-CIVIl-1ST JD

OCT 1 9 2015

HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

VINCENT E. PATURZO and JOANNE PATURZO

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.c. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et aI.,

Defendants.

INDEX NO. 102206/99

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

WHEREFORE, defendant, Avocet Enterprises Inc., hereby requests summary judgmentin the above-titled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiff s Complaint against defendant Avocet Enterprises Inc. with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Avocet Enterprises Inc. be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: Od-v~es- '2> l~'c;·WEITZ & LUXENBERG

Adam Raffo, EsAttorneys for PIal iffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

~OSO ORDERED f \ \ ~~IJ\'i

{}C' . "f\CC... \(:s Or

1'< c\..E.\".CO\JN NC.'J'J ,<OB'tZ

O'TOOLj3.-FERNANDEZ WEINER-" }VA 'lEU LLC

Steven . Wei , Esq.Attorneys for Defendant,Avocet Enterprises Inc.60 Pompton AvenueVerona, New Jersey 07044

RECEIVEDNYS SUPREM~ CT-CIVIL-1ST JD

/11===-_.._.............. . ID/;)3)1S1/ _. .---1'

HON. PETER H. MOULTON3UPREME COURT JUSTICE

OCT 2 3 2015

HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

i" -\ j; \'I 'i

oJ,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

HOWARD WALDMAN

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCAL1. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f1Index No.: 101219/01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ASSOCIATION

("NAPA") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against NAPA, without prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

NAPA, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember g.:

.chol ovack, Esq.~ KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

Peter Marlette, Esq.Barclay Damon, LLP1270 6th Ave #600New York, NY 10020Counsel for National Automotive PartsAssociation

OCT 2 3 2015

RECEIVEDNYS SUPREMe CT-CIVIL-IST JD

/~_.- /..j ,)JSO ORDERED, _..,.,-,.,/..c-/'-- --'-!-I-,OJ c?-f'lj-F , L ffon. Peter H. Moulton 7

OCT 26 2015COUNTY ClEr:w>c' OF

-, 1(\ 0 F/CENEW YORK

HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--viCToii\vILLIA-BlfRfsCHE-AND------ ------ x

AUDREY MAE BURTSCHE, HIS WIFE, INDEX NO. 19024612015Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, et aI,

Defendants.------- -- x

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION (WITH PREJUDICE)

WHEREFORE, defendant, Honeywell Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-titled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffsComplaint against defendant Honeywell Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Honeywell Inc. be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:

KARST & VON OISTE LLP

~JDavid Chandler, Esq.Attorneys for PlaintiffKarst & von Oiste LLP576 Fifth Avenue, Suite 706New York, NY 10036

SO ORDERED

DATED: fah,~o /)O'TOO RNANDEZ WEINERV LIEULLC

Ste einer, Esq.Attorneys for Defendant,Honeywell Inc.

60 Pompton AvenueVerona, New Jersey 07044

f\ LEOOC\ 1~ 1U'~

ClI:.RIZ'S OffICECOUNT't'NEW '{ORK

7

H~NO~;r:;;-;;~:~o ~OULTON, Jos/lnJ;~- RECEIVEDNYS SUPREMI! CT-CIVIL-1ST JD

OCT 2 3 2015

HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

I..·..Ti I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------.-.----:----------...-.-.-.~ ...------XROBERT MUSSI, SR., Index No.: 190274/2014

Plaintiffs, NYCAL

WHEREFORE, defendant, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, sued

-against-

I 84 LUMBER COMPANY, ET AL.,

I---.-.---..---------------.-----.~~-~~~~~~-----x!

lIi

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

incorrectly as "CAMERON INTERNATIONAL," ("CAMERON") hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing .

plaintiff's Complaint against the above defendant l with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORP., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice lll1d without costs.

Dated: New York, Now YorkOctober 14, 2015

. !i

cOS1J~{,LO,SHEA & GAFFNEYLLP

. i/)vZ,{ 1 A ""'-BY: /~··C 'vC1., (I '\. ./'" -'...1 ~'';-

RACHEL L. GOLDBERG ""Attorneys for DefendantsCAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORP.44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 483-9600

OCT 26' 2015

...,..a~H~;~n:...O:e.£~<le::;p=e=te=r H:='=;;:::O:"""U-=-lt-on-!...IofjJ"r~>---7S;>F I LED / .~/ r: (;)

/.-~ .....-.

BY~~lAit!.~~~~ _

At~ltJ.~M.FA".ttorneysfol'""P amtJ1t - '"'t

ROBERT MUSSI, SR800 Third Avenue, 11 lh FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200

III

ea.1'2u.o,SHEh&OAFFNEYllP 1so ORDERED,ATfQI\Nln'S-AnAW '

~i WALl. STRmITNEW YOnK, NY 1O00l

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

..--.-.•.-.----------.••..•-------.------..--..-.------·····xOLIVER S. MCCLEAN and HELGA MCCLEAN,

Index No. 190154/2014Plaintiff(s),

·against-

AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC n., et al.,

Defendants.------.--------------..------..---.------...-------.------x

NOOPPosmONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION& ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Blodgett Corporation ("Blodgett"), hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §

3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant Blodgett with prejudice, and

the!e being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Defendant, Blodgett, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

Ambre Br " Esq..Weitz & LuxenbergAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

James Mo 0, Esq.McCullo gh Ginsberg MontanoAttorneys for Defendant,122 East 42nl3 Street, Suite 3505New York, New York 10168(646) 435-0300

SO ORDERED, '~IBciR_ =-loj;;J?j/~-p~W H.N.o-;t-ton

F I LEDOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERI<'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

This Document Relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Part AO(Moulton, f)Index No: 190025/2014

THERESA SIWA, as Executrix for the Estate ofNELSON A. SIWA, and THERESA SIWA,Individually

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

OWYxr 5,2015

~ ~/IS-H~Moulton=--- /

FILEDOCT 26 2015

COUNTYCL. NEW~~~~OFFICE

Jonath B. Kromberg, Esq.DA ER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAtt meys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Clr}~Ch~~4 P'8Fg\iSef};--Bsq:-­WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500 . _/ r;.~W(lb1~ E/-A rUJI f'J L S '-'.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------------xTONINO MODAFERRI, as Executor for the Estate ofDANTE MODAFERRI and MARY MODAFERRI,

Index No. 190572/2012Plaintiff(s),

-against- NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., nlk/a RHONE POULENC MOTION & ORDERAG COMPANY nlk/a BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC.,

Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------------x

WHEREFORE, Defendant G.S. Blodgett Corporation ("Blodgett"), hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant Blodgett with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Defendant, Blodgett, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

:"'W>oJ"""",

ontano, Esq.Me lough Ginsberg MontanoA orneys for Defendant,122 East 42nd Street, Suite 3505New York, New York 10168(646) 435-0300

SO ORDERED,

Dated: New York, N,9V York9/;).1 It) ,2015

i • I

~)~lcllaeIF~Weitz & LuxenbergAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

............._--------------------------------

SUPREME COURT OF THE S'T'ATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------------xMARY ADESSO, as Administratrix for the Estate ofFRANCESCO ADESSO, and MARY ADESSO,Individually,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, CO., ct aL

Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------------x

Index No, 190573/2012

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION& ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant G.S. Blodgett Corporation ("Blodgett"), hereby

requests sunm1ary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant Blodgett with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Defendant, Blodgett, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

Dated: N~'l.'/(/k, Ne.w YorkL/, I t£.2015

'0JtfJ::tfJ!J£vVU/Lindsay D ciccio, Esq.Weitz & LuxenbergAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

'<:-/~~ °C~ <~

----- /k);--L" , ...n 10, Esq. ~ 0. " !'d .()

McCul gh Ginsberg Montano ~tt.-(~'9-f; ~Atto ys for Defendant, ).-0 (sl0122.ast 42nd Street Suite 3505 ~-T ~~New York, New York 10168 O~(646) 435-0300

SO ORDERED, ~ /DIa-Y'!Ij-HOlLPeter H. Moult~;;--==--- I ~

J

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCdUNTY OF NEW YORK_ ••__w•••_~••••__•••••••••••••••••• ._••••••••••••••_.~••••••_ ••_._){

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

----------------------------------------_._--------------------------}{CHRISTINE CARROLL Individually and as theRepresentative of the Estate ofJOHN P. CARROLL,deceased,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

NYCALLA.S. Part.50(KleiA Heider, I)

Index No.: 190286/12

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et a1.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant HATZEL & BUEHLER, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant HATZEL & BUEHLER, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

. defendant BATZEL & BUEHLER, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

(, and without costs.

---y-z-Rory G. Greebel, EsqCOZEN O'CONNORAttorney for DefendantHatzel & Buehle~ Inc.4S Broadway, 16 FloorNew York,NY 10006(212) 509·9400,

~ i

. , . i)A.o',tl- Q... fJ Asr, Ls,f.SEEGER WEISS, LLP .'.Attorney for Plaintiff F , LED77 Water Street - 26th FloorNew York; NY 10005 OCT 26 2015(212) 584-0700

SO ORDERED,

LEOAL\15445989\1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK- -------------------------------------------------------------------- )(

In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

- -------------------------------------------------------------------- )(

This Document Relates To:

CATHERINE PALAZZO, as Executrix for the Estate ofJACK P. SCAINETTI, and MARGARET SCAINETTI,Individually,

Index No.: 190278/13

Plaintiffs,

- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. andARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Defendants.-- ------------------------------------------------------------------- )(

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC (incorrectly sued herein as MILTON

ROY COMPANY), by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant MILTON ROY, LLC with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant MILTON ROY, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

rk, New York

~

Chris Romanel , \ b Syed K. Rizvi, Esq.WEITZ & LU~~ERG, P.C~ ~ 1.~~ ~RRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Plamtiffs . , i', ,i ~\ 1. 'S O~~Attorneys For Defendant700 Broadway ~ ,;\.S:,,'0'f- ~ Milton Roy, LLCNew York, NY 10003 ~-0 G~ '{O'0 100 Wall Street, 24th Floor

Cp0 ~~ New York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED, ~ / /~~0-Hon. Peter H. Moulton, l.S.C.

,J

,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK----------------------------------------------------------------------------X Index No. 190198-2015ERNEST GILBERT,

Plaintiff,

- against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et aI.,

• NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

AND ORDER

Defendants.---------------------------------------------------------------------------X

WHEREFORE, Defendant GOODRICH CORPORATION, s/h/a The B.F. Goodrich

Company, hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules, Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant

GOODRICH CORPORATION, s/h/a B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all Co-Defendants, all Claims and Cross-Claims against

Defendant GOODRICH CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

----t'-------;f--+1~-l--'---I---' 2015

BY: --f---'--r--~------7i!P <)V: I?-~~"PatrickJ.~

EITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C\.,~ ~ S~TH, STRATTON, WISE,700 Broadway ~i' .'\~ .' o'ClIEHER & BRENNAN, LLPNew York NY 10003, ~'\ " .0-+-0~2 Research Way(212)558-5500 ~ c;'v<V'":,,,O~ Princeton, NJ 08540Attorneys for Plaintiff ~-0~<v~ (609) 924-6000

C;o'J Attorneys for Goodrich Corporation

SO ORDERED ~~ ;------ (Ol;J,JIf.-~Hon. Peter H. Moulton~' ;1

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Index No. 190454/2014

Plaintiff,

A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, et aI.,Defendants.

-against-

STEVEN A. MORENO AND VIRGINIA MORENO,HIS WIFE,

This Document relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Part?,,'~ [:)(Beithn, J.) >

------------;----------

SU~REMECOURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK~ COUNTY OF NEW YORK

f· IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-z(J)

-<zo

WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Peerless Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

SO ORDERED,

e :):---?;>~~,Steven T. Corbin, Esq. David Chandler, Esq. -1Attorney for Defendant Attorney for PlaintiffPeerless Industries, Inc. Steven A. Moreno and Virginia Moreno, his wifeLEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH~~ KARST & VON OISTE, LLP77 Water Street, 21 st Floor ~t#' 576 Fifth Avenue, Suite 401New York, New York 1000\"~ ~~ ... New York, NY 10013212.232.1300 G , ~ 't ,;}:\vX212.764.39001863.~o-,z98.l' ~ ~\ t ,c:) \J'

~ ~\::'I;--I0'f..~G~~O

,d,:, iii II, jt!...

Dated: New 1~~,NewYork

_~-'-~---LI.......<__F~U-A

)JoH~PEj'ERH,MOULTON4846-5279-\ 073.\

INSYNC UtiijAYlijN aUPPORT

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S.PartjO'So

----------------------i ~Meitler, J.)This Document relates to:

Index No. 190424/14

-zen-<zo

ARTHURJ. SAGEVICK and MARY ANNSAGEVICK,

NO OPPOSITIONPlaintiff, SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDER-against-

AIR LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, assuccessor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Peerless Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

.;)

and MARY ANN

Steven T. Corbin, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21 st FloorNew York, New York 10005212.232.13001863.29810

costs.

Q~

\ V .~~~ \G~~----...'\ (\.~ S 0<:'<;;

\)\., <v<0f:. 'R-f.___-'"<--=- ~~,....,,.....vv,-:"*~o---+~~~L---_J_---

Cp\)" ~ Jose P il· ms, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsARTHUR J. SAGEVICKSAGEVICKTHE WILLIAMS LAW FIRM, P.c.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, NY 10167212.668.1122

4812-5870-1857.1

SO ORDERED, -H;;/Y_ffi~A~:=!rl~~--=::::::::::..;---::::.....==:::::::=:::::'::/1;)3)sH::::ZZt1~lc!1f1Ic~

HON.PErERH.MOULTON

\NS'lNC L\'t\M~'f\oN SUPPOt\T

,)'.' \ \ b'LG\S

· .

SUPREME COURT OF mE STATE OF NEW YORK

to:Index No. 190159/14

ROLAND QUASHIE and SABlE QUASHIE,

; NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs,

-against-

AERCO INTERNATlONAL, et al.,

'NYCALLA.S. Part~50(Weidel, Jf-

-..-----------------~

-z, i!";.Vii

-<Zo

WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defenclantPcerless Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

:g:t:;k _Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.LBWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21 st FloorNew York, New York 10005212.232.1300File No. 1863.29499

Jo e illiams, Esq.A orney for Plaintiff(s)ROLAND QUASHIE and SABlE Q ASHIETHE WILLIAMS LAW FIRM, P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, NY 10167212.668.1122

SO ORDERED,--r~~.-.""'.L.~~~,..:.,~=-=:=itl=et'="===-==-=-~)~-

ilCJN~PBTERH.MOULTON

F I LEDOCT 26 2015

r".j "J J

')

4843-8792-6816.1 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

, . I~ . ...OHiNSYNC 'lITIGATiON SUPPORT

U1 • , 'I (. ') n1r:vi Ul..v,J

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

x Index No.: 190002/15IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGAnON

This Document Relates To:PARKE O'CONNOR and PATRICIA O'CONNOR,HIS WIFE,

rt.~f - "LA.S. Pa/~O S ()Weft. Sherry K. Beitler

Plaintiff(s),

-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

AKZO NOBEL PAINTS, LLC., et aI.,

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE, Defendant J-M MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant J-M MANUFACTURING COMPANY,

INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant J-M MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed, with

prejudice, and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

__tt_'--'--.\(_5__:,2015 Q<v ~ ~<v

,. '" ~-==~::::::::::::::===::~------=:)~ '~--71::::"" ~----+----'"'----;rt=-----David A. Chandler, Esq. 0 .~~ D. eltz,KARST & VON OISTE, LLP <::s (;~AL cCAMBRIDGE SINGERAttorneys for Plaintiffs i:~ ..:f& MONEY, LTD.576 Fifth Avenue, Suite 401 d5 Attorneys for J-M MANUFACTURINGNew York, New York 10036 () COMPANY, INC.(212) 764-3900 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, ./1/ ?:- =====- tDhJj;0/7i-Ion: Peter H. Moulton ----= ('-"

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

x Index No.: 190396/14IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:VICTOR A. CRUZ and RAMONA CRUZ,

Plaintiff(s),

LA.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton

-against-

AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., et aI.,

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, Defendant CUMMINS INC., (incorrectly named as CUMMINS ENGINE

COMPANY, INC.) (hereinafter "CUMMINS"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 32 I2, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against Defendant CUMMINS, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant CUMMINS, be and the same are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, and without costs to

Dated: New York, New York

,2015() 8 /17\ ~Q~ \ .if> 1..'\)'{~

~ ~~\ 1,~ o\"\"\G't:-

\.-'t:-0:._ ....,'0 G,,,\ '{

)._ • ---r::- e.-----.- C0 '0\-" ~'t:-\j"

MiJh~~s, Esq. Vtl ·h>·~m~~, J ph J. G netti, Es .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGERAttorneys for Plaintiffs & MAHONEY, LTD.700 Broadway Attorneys for CUMMINS INC.New York, New York 10003 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100(212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10022

(212) 651-7500

either party.

SO ORDERED, --7'~~/C~__~.-.£./L=-===========-=1()Ic)']~07~:Peter H. Moulton ! '- -'j'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

x Index No.: 190246/12IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:ROBERT HAUCK, as Personal Represntative ofthe Estate of PHYLISS HAUCK, deceased,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

x

l.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY.JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant CUMMINS INC., (incorrectly named as CUMMINS, INC.)

(hereinafter "CUMMINS"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant

CUMMINS, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant CUMMINS be and the same are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, and without costs to

either party.

--------_.,,---_._---Michael Cohan, Esq.Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik & Associates, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7413New York, New York 10118

/IA-..L-_~_I--_'__'__' .m",·"__

eltz, EscCAM RIDGE 'lNCJER

& MA NEY, LTD.Attorneys for CUMMINS INC.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

SO ORDERED, ------- ~-rH-.~~====~/IS

FIM r::D~"f~ ~I,:~?fifti ,'Iii:/

OCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK

SUPRHvlE COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-------------------------------------------------------------------xTN RE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, Mazda Motor of America, Inc. dba Mazda N0I1h American Operations be and thesame are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

\VHEREFORE, defendant Mazda Motor of America. Inc. dba \lazda North AmericanOperations hereby request summary judgment in the aboYe-entitled case. pursuant to CiyilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212. dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant \lazda\[otor of America. Inc. dba Mazda NOt1h American Operations \\ith prejudice. and there beingno opposition thereto.

-------------------------------------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:

LOUIS V ALOES,Plaintiff.

-against-

AMERICA?\J HO?\JDA \10TOR co. I\'C . el al..Dcfcndant(s).

-------------------------------------------------------------------:\

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ON

BEHALF OF MAZDA MOTOR OFA'IERICA, INe. DBA MAZDA

NORTH A'IERICANOPERATIONS

Inde:\ No.: 190228/2015

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember 14,2015

65511.2\iOl699730DOCX 1

/1. .' /, IiI / 1--/') '7 !/

/~j!. UL/j--·----B;~ Sa~1Uel ~:lelrowitz,~sq.----- By: Robert Chappell. Esq.ME1ROWITZ & \VASSERBERG, LLP AARONSON RAPPAPORT FE &Attomevs for Plaintiff DEUTSCH. LLP233 Br~a.d\\ay. Suite 950 LeO Attomeys for DefendantNew York. N ....{. 10279 f \ V;,"" \- MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA. I'le.

5 600 Third AvenueOC1 1G?lJ~ New York, ?\Jew York 10016

EP'I<"C:, eFFieE T: 212-593-6700COUN~~~~Or~\Z F: 212-593-6970

SO ORDERED:.-~~R-I\10lTCTO~~_o/'§" .

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190133/15In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ROBERT CASTERELLA,

- against-

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

WElL-MCLAIN, et ai.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WElL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: I () II d ,2015New York, New York

Samuel Meirowitz, sq. ~~;: n . areathers, Esq.MEIROWITZ & ASSE~~.LP SEGAL McCAMBRIDGEAttorneys for Plaintiff ~ ,~ SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.233 Broadway, Su~~ y 't~~ Attorneys for DefendantNew York, NY 102'(1 't~ r.,:y\cx::..Weil-McLain(212) 897-1988 ~~\ ,\,(''0 0 \ 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

~ c\..x::..\o?-+- New York, NY 10022Cp\)~ ~x::..~ (212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, LX ~;D /;>:1/ I:)Ho'n. Peter H. Moulton ~ I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, f>Index No: 19013312015

ROBERTCASTERELLA

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, ~)X York101-5,2015

Jonl). an omberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

/Z/---Hon. Peter H. Moulton

SO ORDERED,

Samuel Meirowitz, q.MEIROWITZ & WA SEBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff845 Third t\¥@Bl:!@, 11th FloorNevl ¥grk, NY 1OO~~(212) 897-1988 s-o233 6'co-.·t~o..\O $",~ qNev"J '-leI ~I N~ \Q:?I~

"

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------------xIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 5'D(Moulton)

----------------------------------------- xThis Document Relates To: Index No: 190200-15

Gerard Sicker, Sr. NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

----------------------------------------- x

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

irginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, New York 10017File No. 10557.01827

lo,lJl.i D5Dated:

a cliffee, Esq."Weitz & xenberg, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED, /ti~~~H. Moul~C. Iv/HiSF I LED

OCT 26 2015

6995366v.1

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

r'- ,J

·" ..

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(JAMES DEABOLD, Index No.: 190310114

Plaintiffs,

- against-

MANNINGTON MILLS, INC. et aI.,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

LA.S. Part~'S-()-MOH. ShellY K. Heitler

Defendants.------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

WHEREFORE, Defendant MANNINGTON MILLS, INC. (hereinafter

"MANNINGTON MILLS"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

Defendant MANNINGTON MILLS, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, MANNINGTON MILLS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantMannington Mills, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, ..//7!l - 10 };}J lIS.diBi£iW:rry K ReiLlet 7 r

F , l. E [)ON.PETERH.MOULTON

OCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

without costs to either party.

Dated: JCI/fV I it? 2015N York, New York

mbr Brandis, Esq.WEI & LUXENBERG, p.e.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-----------------------~------------------------------------------------)(

ELI PETROVITCH, Index No.: 190402114

Plaintiffs,

- against -

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

MANNINGTON MILLS, INC. et al., LA.S. Part~ S 0

--!leB. Sheff)' K. Wi:itlerDefendants.

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(WHEREFORE, Defendant MANNINGTON MILLS, INC. (hereinafter

"MANNINGTON MILLS"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

Defendant MANNINGTON MILLS, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, MANNINGTON MILLS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

Jord FaBELLU OX, LLPAttorneys/or aintiff546 Fifth Av ue, 4th FloorNew York, w York 10036(212) 681-1 75

Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantMannington Mills, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, //~--./~bJI;S".. Hot! Sberry K H@it!@F !'

F I l E l)wN.P£fERH.MOULTON

OCT 26 2015COUNTy CLE ."0

NEW y~~~OFFICE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION--------------------------------------------------------------------x Index No.: 190412/12SARAH BODDEN as Proposed Executrix for the Estate ofTALMAGE BODDEN and SARAH BODDEN,Individually,

Plaintiff(s),-against-

AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC., et. al.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. MoultonDefendants.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, Defendant Gardner Denver, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against Defendant Gardner Denver, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,

Gardner Denver, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either

party.

Dated: New York, New York

GE SINGER &tyn, Esq. 'Suzanne

Z LUXENBERG, P.c.! Atto s for Plaintiff

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED, ,:~~~:::--~~DJ,~t~ DOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERI<'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------xIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

--------------------x

DAVID WILLIAM FAHY,

Plaintiff,

ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. (Individually andas Successor to ARMSTRONG MACHINE WORKS), et al.,

Defendants,

--------------------x

NYCAL

Index No. 190259/2013

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC. (Individually and as Successor to

WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY) (hereinafter "Advance Auto Parts, Inc."), hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Advance Auto Parts, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Advance Auto Parts, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkOctober 16,2015

B~THE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLCAttorneys for PlaintiffDavid William Fahy360 Lexington AvenueNew York, New York 10017(212) 986-2233

-?--:/SO ORDERED,//:~ ~ __._

~n. Peter H. Moulton

DaJ2s~a~MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for DefendantAdvance Auto Parts, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK___________________.x

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL

-------------------x

STEPHEN RIED and BARBARA RIED, Index No. 190452/2014

Plaintiffs,

-against-NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., includingANIXTER, INC.,

Defendants.-------------------x

WHEREFORE, ANIXTER, INC. (hereinafter "Anixter"), sued herein as ANIXTER

INTERNATIONAL, INC., a/kla ANIXTER, INC., hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above­

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

against defendant Anixter with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant Anixter, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

-e~my;tif~itm~~~,~~~q~.~~\\\fe~~ MatthewE. Endlich, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c. \iJ\MALABY & BRADLEY, LLC700 Broadway tC\IJ\)J )50 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10003 J New York, New York 10038Attorneys/or PlaintifJ~' Attorneys/or Anixter Inc.Stephen Ried, et al. (212) 791-0285(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,//Z::?<. -_.__

/ I~Peter H. MoultonDated:

--'---I-'~-+------

OCT I. 6 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------x

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton)

--------------------x

VERONICA MIRANTI and JOSEPH MIRANTI,

Plaintiffs,

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et aI.,including, MORSE DIESEL, il'JC.

Defendants,

--------------------x

Index No. 190004/13

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yor~ New York10 JIJ? ,2015,

i uzannefa cliffe, Esq.jWEITZ!& UXENBERG, Pc.

Attorney\ or PlaintijJSVeronica Miranti and Joseph Miranti700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

',1107Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285

SO ORDERED,/'l;:&----.-~...." ;1

Hon. Peter H. MoultonDated ti:l11tSF , t~ ~>.:: ~n

OCT 26 2015COUNTY ClERI\'S OFF

NEW YORK ICE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-------------------xINRE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 50

-------------------xThis Document Relates to:

GENNARO CELENTANO and ROSE CELENTANO

-------------------x

Index No. 190280/13

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Reynolds Metals Company hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant Reynolds Metals Company, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Reynolds Metals Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New Yark, New Yark

(Hw ~ ,2015 ~

~r-l.~UtL~J' .

SO ORDERED, ,L..~---#;...''''':i!.;,..--'-R~_--==----­( Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Dated: / Dl~JISI 7 I

Flt~EDOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERI\':..) CFF/('ENEW YORK -'

"

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

GUILLERMO PINA and MIRIAM PINA

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 19004112015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

Dated: ~--,-Ic,..L..--_New York, New York

WHEREFORE, Defendant Flowserve US, Inc., solely as successor to Rockwell

Manufacturing Company, Edward Valves, Inc., Nordstrom Valves, Inc., and Edward Vogt Valve

Company (improperly named as Flowserve US, Inc., solely as successor to Rockwell

Manufacturing Company, Edward Valves, Inc., Nordstrom Valves, Inc., Edward Vogt Valve

Company, and Vogt Valve Company) ("Flowserve US"), hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' Complaint against Flowserve US, with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Flowserve US be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

~Q~ \ ~'l 'i> ",-",of:" ,,~\G'<-

~ ~~~so-----...:~---, 00~ ~W-'6--'"-'----"---------------Benjamin Darche, Esq. G Brian Sorensen, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, PC McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendant Flowserve US, Inc., solely ~

Guillermo Pina and Miriam Pina successor to Rockwell Manufacturing Company,700 Broadway Edward Valves, Inc., Nordstrom Valves, Inc., andNew York, New York 10003 Edward Vogt Valve Company

88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED" /':::r;:-~~­/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

,; ..,)

2626024vl'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

This Document Relates to:Index No. 190078/2015

EWALD KESENHEIMER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve US, Inc., solely as successor to Rockwell

Manufacturing Company, Edward Valves, Inc., Nordstrom Valves, Inc., and Edward Vogt Valve

Company ("Flowserve US") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against

Flowserve US with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

Brian Sorensen, Esq.MCELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY &CARPENTER, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Flowserve US, Inc., solelyas successor to Rockwell Manufacturing Company,Edward Valves, Inc., Nordstrom Valves, Inc., andEdward Vogt Valve Company88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

D, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

U be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

lordBel ck ox, LLP546 i h Avenue, 4th FloorNe ork, NY 10036

SO ORDERED,L'?---,,,-,-t_-_1-:...-=====::_--,--/a-/ll~l~!S ."Hon. Peter H. Moulton 'I' J

FILEtDOCT 26 2015~-'-'

I

COUNTY CLERf<'S OFFICENEW YORK

,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ALBINA LICUL and VIKTOR LICUL

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

INDEX NO.: 190173/15

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC f/k1a Burnham Corporation, improperly named

as successor to Burnham Corporation ("Burnham LLC"), hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Burnham be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Adam Dreksler, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew Yark, NY 10003

Dated: New York, New York\0 {2/1 J ,2015

Antoniou McGowan, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED, Z:-Hon. Peter H. Moulton

2785544

FilEDOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLEFlK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 19017312015ALBINA LICUL and VIKTOR LICUL

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant F10wserve US, Inc.. solely as successor to Rockwell

Manufacturing Company, Edward Valves, Inc., Nordstrom Valves, Inc., and Edward Vogt Valve

Company (improperly named as Flowserve US, Inc., solely as successor to Rockwell Manufacturing

Company, Edward Valves, Inc., Nordstrom Valves, Inc., Edward Vogt Valve Company, and Vogt

Valve Company) ("Flowserve US") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against

defendant Flowserve US with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

10 ph P. La Sala, Esq.cElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP

Attorneys for Defendant Flowserve US, Inc., solelyas successor to Rockwell Manufacturing Company,Edward Valves, Inc., Nordstrom Valves, Inc., andEdward Vogt Valve Company88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

defendant Flowserve US be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: (0 (Z (15New York, New York

SO ORDERED,

Adam Dreksler, Esq.

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. . n..700 Broadway ('; VNew York, New York iO~~ ~

f \ 'l~~C0~\ 1..~ ,c. ort-'f\Ct:.-

_\A'f- -..J

:0 C"-€'iO~y...CO\j0. 0.t:.-'J'l

-iif!?A ----- I~ I:J-? lISH orable Peter H. Moulton, lS.C. r I

2781279 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 190422/14

RANDALL F. BRAHE and ELEANOR BRAHE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Rockwell Automation, Inc. (misnamed in the First Amended

Complaint as "Rockwell Automation, Inc. (a1k/a Allen Bradley) (Individually and as Successor

to Allen-Bradley and Reliance Electric Company") (hereinafter "Rockwell" or "Defendant"),

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Rockwell, without prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Rockwell be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York'I.N.e)YYorkIU\ ((; IlS ,2015

(

IN P i {tt' ClVBnan F. Early, Es Joseph 'f. La'Sala, Esq.Attorneys for Plaintiffs cElrol, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPThe Early Law Firm, LLC \ l: ttorneys for Defendant Rockwell Automation,360 Lexington Avenue, 20th tmo\ ~ .P Inc.New York, NY 10017 '\ lfO 1\j\~ 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

Gc,\ c ,~York, New York 10005

2719657

j -- , ""

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

WILLIAM D. WHITSON andROSE WHITSON

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 190265/13

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, incorrectly s/h/a "BURNHAM, LLC,

Individually, and as successor to BURNHAM CORPORATION" (hereinafter "BURNHAM

LLC") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Ne,w b2i New YorkC0h 5 ,2015

. Brandis, Esq.Weitz Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003

/j~-

~w F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED,

2720946

/;2L-: ~ (IJ/J-i I/sHon. Peter H. Moulton 7 / '

ft..... 0F' L COCT I. 6 2015

COUNTY CLERf<'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

HERMAN ANDERSON and DONNAANDERSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASHUSBAND AND WIFE

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 190085/2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Rockwell Automation, Inc. ("Rockwell"), hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Rockwell, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant Rockwell be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New ~kfjewYorkCo 2... ~ 2015

Joe . Vazq , Esq.. lIino & Barnes, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs420 Lexington AvenueSuite 2140New York, New York 10170

Joseph p;\ La ala, Esq.McElroW Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for DefendantRockwell Automation, Inc.88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

___________________--'--- -1

SO ORDERED, //~/#- - fJf;;;'Jj/~Hon. Peter H. Moulton

FI - [:~D';~"Im ~~_...... m

2749983

OCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

J

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

----- -------------------------------------------------------------

This Document Relates to:

fRANK GONDAR

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 190079/2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Rockwell Automation, Inc., (misidentified in the Verified

Complaint as Rockwell Automation, Inc., Individually and as Successor to Timken Heating

Business and S. Co., Inc. flkla Scaife Company, as Successor in Interest to Rockwell Spring &

Axle Company's Timken Silent Automatic Division), ("Rockwell"), hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,/

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Rockwell, with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Rockwell be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

Jordan C. FAttorneys f ai tifBelluck & 0 ,L.

1546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorlNew York, NY 10036

---------

SO ORDERED,

2749704

~ ~Hon. Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, 11)Index No: 190274/2014

RICHARD MUSSI, Sr. NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

/Kromberg, Esq.DAR ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAtto eys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27\h Street, 12\h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

Dated: New.. Yl/k, New York'(1 0.L' J ,2015

I

tf.'hn n..~..+n----"-E·...,'­~ ......an, sq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew Yark, NY 10022(212) 605-6200

tJ,~ ~OJAc.-~, e~ ..

so ORDERED, LL:Han. Peter H. Moulton

FII~EDOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERf\'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DIANE MCLAUGHLIN, as Executrix for theEstate of KENNETH MCLAUGHLIN JR., andDIANE MCLAUGHLIN, Individually

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 190192/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

--~'E':~PfWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

_1_0_"_""__"2015

Sdudith A. Yavitz, sq.DARGER E NTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for U ion Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~ l~hJ~5£T-T-------------'--I-/ !Mon. Peter H. Moulton

, .

SUPRE~vlE COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.............--- - - ----.- ·-·--·--·-xCiL:l~;\RD 130C('I;\. individual!)' und us Executor(lfth(~ [Slate ol.r\NTOINETTE BOCCIA, dt:ct:as(;d.

Plaintilrs,

NYCAL ASBESTOS CASELA.S. Part;~..t""S"O(:\'JoultOIl, P.)

Index No.: 190309/2014-against-

CBS CORI'.. ct al.NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY.JlIDGl\lENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants........... -- -.-.-.- .. -- ---.-- -·····--··x

WllFRf·TORF. Lkl(:tlLlant (joss Intcrnlltiont11 Corpnr~llit)n (ilH:orreClly slid as Goss

fnlernaliunal Corp .. illdi\'idu:lIly and as SlICi.:cssor to Closs Graphic SysteIlls (nc .. iv1ichk·Cjoss-Dextcr

In<:. allll 1vlil:ldc Priming I)ress :vl:HllIl"m:turing Co.. and Rockwell Clraphii.: Syslems Inc.) ("(;IC")

hneby n:qucsts summary judgmcnt in the abl)\'l~-entitlcd case. pursuanl to Civil Practicc Law and

Ruks Section .1'212 and the NYC\!.. /\mendcd Case Management Order dated September 20. 1996.

!\mended as of I:<:!mwry 1(), 200l, dismissing PI,lintilrs' Veritil'd CLll11plaint :Igainsl rklt'llll.lnt (ne

with prl'.iudil·l', and there IK'ing no opJlositil1n 111\:relo,

ORDERL]). lkl( upon notice (1 :111 co·defendant~. all claims :lI1d cross daims against

Ddendant (j Ie be and the samc (In: hereby dismissed with prejudicc and without costs.

Ddtl'd: New York. New York_~_~.JS ,2015

SCI INi\DE!{ I !;\RRISON SE(i/\L & U,:WIS LLP

SO ORIWI{i':D.

1'111: I ..'\N [[-'I{ L.A \\. (:J IU"l

r--·" I~)

r;,Ej)";~)~;}I.:-:::sS'(:7l'ittt{.

r2'tlEast 5(lth Sireet. ) 1 FloorNew '{ork. N\' 10022.\llUrrll·yS ror PlailllilTs

13Y:.~~~';:~C:~·="Z'~.. ~-- ..M~llthew S. Tall1asco. Esq.140 Broadway, Jist FloorNew York. New York 10005:\tlorneys I'm lkfl'ndanlGoss Ill/erna/ionol Cor/Jrl/'(/fiol/

~; ri~~lOur",;i-jV~3J!~ F I LEDocr;; f:

Cou 1'11IlA'I';\ !l17J./}J5NT'( CL-'

t:A!\'s 0.... ... NEW YORK FFICE------------------------------

MONSERRATE ACOSTA

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

This Document Relates to:

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER---------------------'

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: NewYor, New York

Samuel eirowitz, E q.MEIROWITZ & WASSEBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff

_ 845 Third Ayemw; 1lib FloorNew Y6fk, ~(Y lOO~(212) 897-1988

233 B(~'td vJCt 'INY. tJ~1 10 'J,. /9

J0 th n B. Kromberg, Esq.DAAGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, lih FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, /1""/..:-~Hon. Peter H. Moulton

F' lEDOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, p)Index No: 19010312015

DARIO BATTISTONI

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

. Kromberg, Esq.D E ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorn s fI 'CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Samuel M rowitz, sq.MEIROWITZ & WASSEBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff~4:; Thiid hYf2IfHif21, 11 th FleeF

~te1yV Y oIl, ti't 10022--(212) 897-1988

~33 ffiJadvJWQJ0vJ vorf.- .I IJ\' (OrA71

ROCCO NOVELLINO

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

---------------~ (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 190307/2013

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/kIa Rhone Poulenc AG Company,

n/kIa Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New YOreoNeW YorkCt::h.- be..( ,2015

QoCL~,....¥r8ltk Ortiz, Esq:- ADAi\/l 4:?M=-f'-t.} €~lJ..

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

1=1 LEDocr 26 2015

COUNry CLER /

NEW YO~~OFFICE

Judith A. . z, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

a~~·Hon. Peter H. Moulton

SO ORDERED,

ROCCO NOVELLINO

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

--------------------j (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 190307/2013

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkU~h~ ({-i ,2015

~q~4M~ c y~.-J-u--:d--:it-,---h-A-.-Y-a-v-:-"it-z,-E....lsrl-'-.---------

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e. DARGER ERRANT YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ----L:~~~ li;L3JIS'·i~ /'

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-------------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-------------------------------------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:

ANGELO GUERRA and ANTOINETTEGUERRA,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aI.,

Defendants.

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 190115/2015

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

-------------------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: o~Joev 101 )o1S­New York, New ork

Samuel Meirowitz, sq.MEIROWITZ & WASSERBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)845 THinl AV8Rl:le, 1Hit Floor

-New York, N)' 10012(212) 897-1988Z3~ ~[oc.. Jv-lG..I' S~',\e'(S-ONevJ i\/ Ie, N'-\ \OT1~

SO ORDERED, ~. ;7..--------­Hon. Peter H. Moulton

~ ~Alford Kneis, Esqa /(

O~ 0(' >

~0- /<, 4~

599 Lexington Avenue 1-'('~('1>~~~''''' CNew York, NY 10022-6030 01>1-1.5'O~(212) 536-3900 ~a

<$'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, J?)Index No: 19011512015

ANGELO GUERRA AND ANTOINETTEGUERRA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New YZkt!.f;W York(J ~ ,2015

I 7

JonathDAR ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 1i h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Samuel Meirowltz, Esq.MEIROWITZ & WASSEAttorneys for Plaintiffs84S Third A¥@R.ye, 11 th Plum~w Yt'rk, }>lY 10022(212) 897-1988 $ ~ ''Ul:>1. b~ (broo.d \,J£l'1' ' u.

New ,!\)i~' N'l lGt"'~

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

This Document Relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Part)fJ'SD(Heitler, J.)

Index No: 19041612014

JOHN A. GALLAGHER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

O~b~~ ,2015

~~--~ K. I1eitlet

NON,PIHBRH.MOULTON

SO ORDERED,

C€\(J)~

Char188 M!t;g,-a-s-orr.:rrsa:-,-----,s=-q-.---:,~-,-...-M----:::P==-~--""o-, e3QJonat . Kromberg, Esq.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e. DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.700 Broadway 116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

This Document Relates to:

WAYNE E. NORMAN AND LUCY NORMAN

NYCALl.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 190436/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New Yor , New York

/L' 15 ,2015

guson, Esq.,V~WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

udith A. Yavitz,ARGER ERR TE YAVITZ & BLAU LLP

Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~hr -on. Peter H. Moulton

..

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

------------------1 (Moulton, f.)Index No: 190213/14

WENDY SCHOPPERT, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYESTATE OF CONRAD L. FRUEHAN, AND MARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERELEN FRUEHAN INDIVIDUALLY

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: ~e~fY9fk, New York-----'1q~ (~ ,2015

-r-/2:~---,--P-~~....:::-~--_-_--lIO/~//SMon. Peter H. Moulton

Judith A. vitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Erik Jacobs, Esq.WEITZ & LUXE"''''T1oU'hG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

----------------1 (Moulton, p>Index No: 190213/14

WENDY SCHOPPERT, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYESTATE OF CONRAD L. FRUEHAN, AND MARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERELEN FRUEHAN INDIVIDUALLY

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York__~t rt ,2015

Erik Ja ,sq.WEITZ & LUXENB GAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

JUdith~--------­DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, --/-/)CCA~/-k~======-=-~/O/~liSHon. Peter H. Moulton /'

FilE Docr 26 2015

COUNTy CLER I

NEW YO~~OFFICE

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

JOANN FOTI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASEXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ALEXANDERFOTI

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

--------------------j (Moulton, f?JIndex No: 190513/12

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New YPfk, New York(;C-Ivbe..r 2S 2015=-----::....---,

/' /J{ (cf2..fL".Eran*-ertiz; . A\)~M ~~~O, E5Q-.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(2l2) 558-5500

--Judith A. Yavitz, Es .DARGER ERRAN YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(2l2) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

F/l IE DOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLER I

NEW YO~~OFFICE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LlTIGAnON

This Document Relates to:

EVELYN MATOS

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, if))

Index No: 190375/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: NewYor ,New York

/(J / '9 ,2015

.-- "

JsAA .fl:,-euimm;~·Esq;····---·····,· -­LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200

}j''''~~ t--J~~,,- ~ ~

amberg, Esq.DAR ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAtto eys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street 1i h Floor,New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, OF v/ ,/-fH-on-.~p-'et=er-~'-~-M-~-~~It-on-·-"-----+-/;d'llS

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

EVELYN MATOS

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, R)Index No: 19037512014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200

01~ ~-~L.,~f '

Dated: NeWY~k, New York

/0 l'i ,2015I

Jonath B. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2ilt Street, lih FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, --Ta'----"--"'~sc:::.:~6'--:;..-----_--_----'....;(0/:;).1 J/SHan. Peter H. Moulton ! ( !

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-------------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:

RAYMOND W. PLANTE and DORISPLANTE,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION,as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps Inc.,et aI.,

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 19015912015

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: /0/ /3/ 1L(;New York, New York

~'

"./-r "'./ ~.~--z'("7 ~<:~c;, A .Arthur Prystowsky, EsqLEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200

Kir en Alford Kneis, Esq.L GATES LLP

ttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, -~>~~~/---------0!.I()'..J..Y/;)~/I')Hon. Peter H. Moulton T 'I j

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-------------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-------------------------------------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:

JAMES P. BILLINGS and ELIZABETH BILLINGS,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, CO., et al.,

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------------x

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 190250/2015

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated ~13 !J ()Newarkl

, New York

Lindsay D cicco, sq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,~~Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Alford Kneis, Esq.K& ATES LLPA rneys for Defendant

RANECO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

11:;1/5

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-------------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-------------------------------------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:

DAVID E. LEISTIKOW and JANICE PETERSONLEISTIKOW,

Plaintiff(s),

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Han. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 190272/2015-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, assuccessor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., et aI.,

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Defendants.-------------------------------------------------------------------x

WHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Kirsten t\.lford Kneis, Esq.K&L ATES LLPAtt neys for Defendant

NECO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

Lindsay D cicco, Esq.WEITZ LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, --+-?Jf:------+--=-·.r>--~A-~-·~-------_+_t"'+d:;:J lISHan. Peter H. Moulton / 'II

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated~~ IttNewark, New York

/, / .1t• I '.c\ '\A !!i .

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION---------------------------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:

GENNARO CELENTANO and ROSECELENTANO,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aI.,

Defendants.

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 190280/2013

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

---------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO., with respect to named defendants Crane Co.

and Crane Co., Individually and as Successor to Pacific Valves, (an unincorporated product line

of MCC Holdings, Inc. identified incorrectly as a subsidiary of Crane Co.) ("CRANE CO.")

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Ct4cb~.r 2 I dC,1 S­New York, New York

u~2uA\;I

n Alford Kneis, Esq.K GATES LLP

ttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, /2!?'~----­Hon. Peter H. Moulton

X:CLB/6 / 280/DISMISSA LSINOS.fM " '>\~, .. :~. "SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF'N'EWYORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------~-----------J<JOSEPH FLEIGNER,

Plaintiff(s), ,:i

- against-

A.W. CHESTERTON, et al.;

Defendants.

-----------------------------------------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Index No.: 190245115

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212," ;.....

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint agains\ de1~,i;i:lanteLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,"-""''-'1'' ,"

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co~defendants, all claims and cross claims against'I,.

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be gild the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

/'-'~) -//',// /,~-

/::>'/:/' -';;::;;:!;~:~)~k./ /?( L~(

p{~iel Blouin, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsSimmons Hanly Conroy112 Madison AvenueNew York, New York 10016

C:;:~ett~ "uitt, 'sq.Attorneys for eLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED,~~ ',,/u/2)1;5Hon. Peter Moulton "" I· ! I

;;JF'I. t:: D;' m ~:'<!..'l1 t"w" ;, _-

OCT l 6 2015COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

-·_-'~"---~~l.i '--==~/

:r'> ~. C) ,') ':":o~T ,j ,"",5

,----J

X:FBW/60881./legal/NOSJM

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------)(JOEL BERLIN and JEANNE BERLIN,

Plaintiff(s),

- against-

AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., et al.;

Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------~--)(

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Index No.: 190022/15

NYCALLA.S. Partl'~0

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New Yark 10003

~~~Brian Feld, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

~/ASO ORDERED, ,/ -

~erMoulton lojdJ>/l6"FII'NMED

OCT l 6 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

r, "-,-.,..U!v i

CLB57848/legal/nosjrnlJUNE2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------------------------------------)(RITA PACELLA, Individually and as ExecutrixFor the Estate of ANTHONY PACELLA, JR.,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et ai.,

Defendant(s),-----------------------------------------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Index No.: 190556/12

NYCALLA.S. PartA" ~EJ

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. .-Ck~b~ 0)oOI~

Q(j)i;;Shawn' ,Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

.l.... .•:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATEOF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORK

----------------------------------------------------------------){JOSEPH LUCENT and DOLORES LUCENT,

Plaintiffs,-against-

3M COMPANY, Individually and as Successor toMinnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, et aI.,

Defendants.

----------------------------------------------------------------J{

....:\

New York City AsbestosLitigationNYCAL

Index No. 109348/2011

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, 3M Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, 3M Company, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, 3M Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.Dated: New Y9r~ Nfw York._

---->'\-"'-10~~Q LS~2~

Jan~LOCKS LAW FIRMAttorneys for Plaintiffs800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, New York 10022

/

LORC&D

c~ , OCT 1 6 1015

RECEIVED

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------------------------------------------------------------){In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGAnON

-----------------------------------------------------------------------){This document relates to:

HOWARD WALDMAN

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, (Y.)

Index No.: 101219/01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC. ("STANDARD

MOTOR") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against STANDARD MOTOR,

without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

STANDARD MOTOR, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without

costs.

//---=-~=-----:~~'---..:.-~--"----

Nic ova k, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

Richard O'Leary, Esq.Troutman Sanders LLP875 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022Counsel for Standard Motor Products, Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(This Document Relates To:

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, PJIndex No: 190214/09

CYTHIA MAGILL, INDIVIDUALLY, AND DENNISPLUMPTON, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OFOTIS CORTHELL

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Farrell Lines Incorporated, Individually and as Successor in

Interest to American Export Lines, Inc. (hereinafter "Farrell Lines") hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Farrell Lines with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant Farrell Lines be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

/"&CZ··

Ruthe Nepf, Esq.THOMPSON HINE LLPAttorney for Defendant335 Madison Avenue, lih FloorNew York, New York 10017(212) 344-5680

NIcholas Novack, sq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

SO ORDERED, 4:: :=::-:-.... /0 /;} &~S7Hon. Peter Moulton ~! C / I

284055.1

F !i r= D;:,

I ~:"'''' ~:....a i·

OCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERf<'S OFFICENEW YORK

(: --,l.,

.J

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------}{IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton)

--------------------------------------------------------------}{This Document Relates To: Inde}{ No.: 104126-05

JANEEN DAHN, as Personal Representative ofthe Estate of LESTER J. DAHN and MARYDAHN, Individually,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

--------------------------------------------------------------}{

WHEREFORE, defendant Pneumo Abe}{ LLC, successor in interest to Abe}{ Corporation,

incorrectly sued herein as "PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION," (hereinafter "Abe}{"), hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Abe}{, with prejudice, there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

- , i.5IIJIL __ .

11047615v.l

Alfred J. SargeHAWKINS PA LL THACKSTON

& YOUNGLLPAttorneys for Defendant,Pneumo Abe}{ LLC, Successor in interestto Abe}{ Corporation600 Le}{ington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, New York 10022-7678(212) 897-9655

SO ORDERED, ~----~Jdfo/I~-'---;l,r.4--H-o-n-.P-e-te-r-H-.-M-o-ul-:'t-o-n- 7' !'

FII~EDOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

y d smissed with prejudice and without costs.

Jordan Fo}{, s.Attorneys for aintifBELLUCK & FOX LLP546 5th Ave, 4th FloorNew York, NYlO036(212) 681-1575

SUPRi~ME C"OT}RT OF THE STATE OF NE:W YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

(Jz>CIJZ-

III

GENN/\RO AZZARONE as Administrator of:the Estate ofNICOLA AZZARONE. deceased.

Plaintiffs,

-against-

Allis Chalmers COlvoration Product Liability!Trust i

I

Defendants. iI

Index No.: 190137/2010

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER AS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.

WHEREFORE. defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant Peerless Industries. Inc .. with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto.

ORDERED. that upon notice to all co-defendants. all claims and cross claims against

defendant Peerless Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New York

.........,;----+t----' 2015

R ek Lee, -:: 'q.Attorney for Defen antPEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SrvllTH LLP77 Water Street, 21 5t FloorNew York, New York 10005212.232.1300File No. 1863.2696.f

Nicholas Novack, Esq.Attorneys for PlaintitlsGENNARO AZZARONE as Administrator ofthe Estate of NiCOLA AZZARONE, deceasedLEVY KONIGSBERG. L.L.P.800 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022212.605.6200

SO ORDERED. _~""",/7~ .{(on. Peter H. Moulton

-1839-2667-8550 I OCT 26 2015COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

Index No.: 190251/2010

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER AS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.

P1ai nti frs,

-against-

II

DONALD SPAETH, Individually and as!Executor of the Estate of JEAN SPAETH, I

IIIIIIIIIIIIIII

II

3M COMPANY, 11k/a Minnesota Mining & !Manufacturing Co., et aI., I

IIII

Defendants. :.

~':J

ttt:.i.>(J)Z-

WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Peerless Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs. ~Q\ V

;-D--:a?'"te=.dt-:N-f-e_>w_Y~o_r",""k~'_Nc-_e_\_v Y_~;_~_1_5_~_._\_\)~..,....~('\'?~~~nJlJ~-<JEsse dgcrs, Esq. 00""""~Esq.

Attor ey for Defendant G Attorneys for PlaintiffsPEE LESS INDUSTRIES, INC. DONALD SPAETH AND ESTATE OF JEANLE [s BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP SPAETH77 Water Street, 21 st Floor LEVY KONIGSBERG, LL.P.New York, New York 10005 800 Third Avenue212.232.1300 New York, NY 10022File NQ. 1863.27132 212.605.6200

SO ORDERED, ~'"----~--_lo;bC7/I5'.. Han. Peter II. Moulton 7

4839·2667-8550.1

.) ;, .i. _:r ~ •(,: '-.

r- (jj c'"'!li -<

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

------------------------------------------------------------------xJENNIFER WHITE, as Executrix for the Estate ofGLENN LIMBURG,

Plaintiff(s),-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aI.,

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------------x

Index No.: 102380/03;127888/02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDER

BOA. gheff)' Klein Heidel'-

WHEREFORE, Defendant, PACCAR INC., and its unincorporated division PETERBILT

MOTORS COMPANY, (hereinafter "PACCAR") hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

against Defendant PACCAR with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant

PACCAR be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

5/J3J ~( 7

~i?fN~~C<L"''JC~Attorneys for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayN ew York, NY 10003

er L. Bu ner, Esq.SE AL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant PACCAR INC.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022

SO ORDERED, ;::zKlein ;;;;;;-:J!};l{,j/SHON. PErERH. MOULTON

FIl.EDOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION---------------------------------------------------------------------------)(RENA DYKE, Individually and COLLEEN M. SHANNON asAdministratrix for the Estate of ROBERT K. DYKE,

Plaintiff(s),

Index No.: 116944/1999

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A.C. & S. INC., et aI.,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------)(WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, A.W. Chesterton Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.

fr AtO-vc~ Madina Axelrod, Esq.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.

Dated: New York, New York

cFnmk Orti~, Esq. ?h U-'lAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

SO ORDERED, ~I4'on:eterH:MOulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION---------------------------------------------------------------------------)(SANDRA MARTIN, as Executrix for the Estate ofEDWARD STEMPIEN.,

Plaintiff(s),

Index No.: 121882/1998

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A.C. & S. INC., et aI.,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.---------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, A.W. Chesterton Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.

14- Iv tJ--rro.-cl-o Madina Axelrod, Esq.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

SO ORDERED,---6/Y~_--:"'~~---lIj) Je>-fo!lS-'U;I(I>eter H. Moulton 1<

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.

,:pAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Dated: New York, New York

q JJ~ II)

without costs to either party.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190221/10In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ZEV SHEMBERG,

- against -

WElL-MCLAIN, et aI.,

Plaintiff(s),

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

WHEREFORE, Defendant WElL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated:-~~--+--'---I-~

N cholas Novack, sq.LEVY, PHILLIPS &KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10003(212) 605-6200

~:;(~SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE Ul1;iy <'6' ()SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD. tV, Cz<s <'Of.]Attorneys for Defendant '$"t-y;..,ItlrsWeiI-McLain 0Jt,.,.- O.A'~850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100 C~

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, --+-'-//'------"-------------------+/.'+0/Q-fO ferHOn:Petef H. Moulton / /

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190137110In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NICOLA AZZARONE,

- against -

WElL-MCLAIN, et aI.,

Plaintiff(s),

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

WHEREFORE, Defendant WElL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Wei1-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

_-'---""'--6---!....-'---__, 2015ark

N cho1as ovack, Esq.LEVY, PHILLIPS &KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10003(212) 605-6200

Andrew P. ates, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, a,<. ----== [uk ~ I;s'Hon. Peter H. Moulton ' / / r

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190131109In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SPENCER OAKLEY,

- against-

WElL-MCLAIN, et aI.,

Plaintiff(s),

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

WHEREFORE, Defendant WElL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

N cholas Novack, Esq.LEVY, PHILLIPS &KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10003(212) 605.,6200

J::­III

.. ~ ,., '.. t',~<I('l<'G <'/'<:: ()

. 4'<s9.(:. . v/srew P. Ka es, Esq. t-y y,!J'jl-s

SEGAL 'McCAMBRIDGE 0!J'/r C;Z--j-:'SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD. 10$Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, ~/4c~--.__-lol;;y;sL Hon. Peter H. Moulton 7 <

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 125781/99In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

JOSEPH M. DE MAURO,

- against-

WElL-MCLAIN, et al.,

Plaintiff(s),

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

WHEREFORE, Defendant WElL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

pl~intiff's complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: \ 0 / ~ ,2015New York, New York

~1~.~ ~WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGEAttorneys for Plaintiff 0 SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.700 Broadway C Attorneys for DefendantNew York, NY 100~ \ \1~ ~ WeiI-McLain(212) 558-5500 t""" ~ lru\~ 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

Qc,\ 1 ~ ci'Jew York, NY 10022CL.E.rW~:S Qln (212) 651-7500

C00\"rI~~E.'!'J ~O?-'tZ

SO ORDERED, ~,{. =.J.o~b/ /5&~H. Moulton·

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 119373/00In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

JOSEPH OLEXA,

- against-

WElL-MCLAIN, et aI.,

Plaintiff(s),

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

WHEREFORE, Defendant WElL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and 'there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: 10 / 0 l' ,2015New York, New York

gllL"7l!t.<~ ~Matthew Macintyre, Esq. arew P. es, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGEAttorneys for Plaintiff 0 SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.700 Broadway C Attorneys for DefendantNew York, NY 10003~ \ \"'_ ~ Weil-McLain(212) 558-5500 ~. " ~ 1~\~ 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

\)c,\ L . __ ~w York, NY 10022CLS?'\ZS (Jrr\ {212) 651-7500

CO\J\,r\'{NS'J'J '{0 t\\Z

SOORDERED,~ IV/;)(Pj'Son. Peter H. Moulton 7

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190413111In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

FRANCIS GOES,

- against-

AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et aI.,

Plaintiff(s),

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP CaMPANY hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

Dated: ~~fl\9<r z..q ,2015New York, New York

~-r~.J_-t-:-Matthew MacIntyre, Esq. ~ Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGEAttorneys for Plaintiff ~INGER& MAHONEY, LTD.700 Broadway \ \ . Uttorneys for DefendantNew York, NY 10003 f~t:" Aurora Pump Company(212) 558-5500 OC\ 'L tl lG\t::J 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

-l'~ (·r~\~ York, NY 10022

O\J\,rr< CLt:'i-\I"RlZ--> (212) 651-7500

C N'E\J'J ,<0 .JSO ORDERED, ~ (,----------. 10/8&/ /,<)

/'Hon. Peter H. Moulton I

.-- . .

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

I.A.S. PartxO(Moulton, of)

INDEX NO.: 99-108282

(L'

FREDERICK F. KELLY, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of FREDERICKP. KELLY, JR.,

against

A.C.AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

HOAGLAND. LONGO,MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

WHEREFORE, defendant, KOHLER CO., hereby requests summary jud~ment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, KOHLER CO., with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, KOHLER CO., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

DATED:J

H SHAH, ESQ. ~'

HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,KOHLER CO.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED: ~Q~ D 6o//Sf \ \, ""l\lfl -;:tQl1()rable Peter H. Moulton 7C\CO' 'lit> .'r'r-\ct.\JV "s Q

C00t'~t'~'!;~6?-Y- III ~ ~ 1111111mIN-BLUE-9

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190413/11In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

FRANCIS GOES,

- against-

AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et aI.,

Plaintiff(s),

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

~~~~Matthew MacIntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

Dated: s,( e<-{'t\~r z..q ,2015New York, New York

Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New Yark, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, =zf:~~--:::?:=:::::==========---=Afd!.()I-!j~;)!o/J\~F I l ET} Peter H. Moulton ===r

OCT 26 2015COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------x

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, ~

--------------------x

RONALD RESUA and SUSAN RESUA,

Plaintiffs,

A.C. and S., INC. et aI., including, MORSE DIESEL,INC.,

Defendants,

--------------------x

Index No. 117884/00110182/00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York()C\P'oe.r ~ ,2015

0e<£VJJ1Adam~--------WEITZ & LUXENBERG, Pc.Attorneys for PlaintiffsRonald Resua and Susan Resua700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

OCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

e-osario Chetta, Esq.

MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285

Dated: I 0L~/S7

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-------------------xINRE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 50

-------------------.x

This Document Relates to:

JOSEPH DAVIS

-------------------x

Index No. 190022/10

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Reynolds Metals Company hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant Reynolds Metals Company, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Reynolds Metals Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkOC+Z>ber 2 ,2015

. Matthew MacIntyw,--Esq.,.4j)~{'(\()A:t)~"-DIem. Michael J. Curtis, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC MALABY & BRADLEY, LLC700 Broadway 150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10038Attorneys for PlaintifJ(s) Attorneys for Defendant(212) 558-5500 (212) 791-0285

SOORDERE~ ==-=--=-. ___Hon. Peter H. Moulton

F I LEDOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------x

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

--------------------x

This Document Relates to: Index No. 123322/02

JAMES H. CONROY and ISABEL CONROY NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

--------------------x

WHEREFORE, Defendant Reynolds Metals Company, incorrectly sued herein as

"Reynolds Metals Company, as successor in interest to Atlantic Asbestos Corporation," hereby

requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant Reynolds Metals Company,

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Reynolds Metals Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated:--f-------''-+-''-------

Matthew MacIntyre, Esq. A:i:».JV\ \?AftC!() , 1:.51:2 Michael J. Curtis, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC MALABY & BRADLEY, LLC700 Broadway Go Q 150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10003 \ ~ Y New York, New York 10038Attorneys for PlaintifJ(s) f ~ 1..'\}~ Attorneys for Defendant(212) 558-5500 C'\~\ 1.. O~~~2) 791-0285

\) y.:..S~-0 C,--S~O\\'f­

COD ~S\l'l

SO ORDERED~~Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Dated: New York~ewYork~hl2f ~( ,2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------x

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

--------------------x

This Document Relates to: Index No. 115364/02, 107007/02

KENNETH CARBOY and MARTHA P. CARBOY NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

--------------------x

WHEREFORE, Defendant Reynolds Metals Company, incorrectly sued herein as

"Reynolds Metals Company, as successor in interest to Atlantic Asbestos Corporation," hereby

requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant Reynolds Metals Company,

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Reynolds Metals Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkOchJb~I 2 ,2015

Matthew MacIntyre, Esq. AbAiY) R~c, <?~~ichael J. Curtis, Esq.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC MALABY & BRADLEY, LLC700 Broadway 150 Broadway, Suite 600

New Yark, New York 10003 r..: 0 New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s) f \ \.. '[~.rs '. Attorneysfor Defendant(212) 558-5500 , c 1m!) (212) 791-0285

OC\ Lu

CLt=.R\<'S OffICE

SO ORDERED,~9L1N1'INEW~~~ed: -----'1'-0--l-(;_2-----'-""~+_/;~~r_---Hon. Peter H. Moulton - 7 7

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

CONO AMILO MASCARELLA

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 109071/2000

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Rockwell Automation, Inc., as successor in interest to Allen-

Bradley Company, LLC ("Allen-Bradley"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against Allen-Bradley, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant Allen-Bradley be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorktflJO ,2015

~"Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Phan Alvarado, Esq.Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg, p.e.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

SO ORDERED,

Joseph P. a S la, Esq.McElroy, eutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Rockwell Automation,Inc., as successor in interest to Allen-BradleyCompany, LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

:lb/dG ~Sr i'

FlleEDOCT 26 2015

2803906

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGAnON

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, /?)

Index No.: 19025111 0

JEAN SPAETH

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant UNION CARBIDE CORP. ("UCC") requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiff's complaint against UCC, without prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

UCC, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkOctober 13,2015

, . ~C~i~, Judith I avitz, Esq.

f \ ~ ,i;~~\'i ~~g~:s;~~~~~e~~il~tfF~~~~ LLP

\j(\ 1~ ff\CtNew York, NY 10016C\-'2.\-\~S 0 Counsel for Union Carbide Corp.

COU\"f0~'2.\j'oj ,<OB.Y--

SO ORDERED,~A_______ lo/J6/U~Hon. Peter Moulton, J.S.C. 7

Nicholas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

{00369107.DOCX}

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------J(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------J(This document relates to:

NYCAL1. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, p.>

Index No.: 190103110

KATHLEEN SCIARABBA

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant UNION CARBIDE CORP. ("UCC") requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against UCC, without prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

UCC, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkOctober 13,2015

Judith y)tvitz, Esq.Darger/Errante, Yavitz & Blau LLP116 East 27th Street, 1i h Floor

New York, NY 10016Counsel for Union Carbide Corp.

{00369106.DOCX}

Nicholas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022

Counsel for p... :ain!!J[

f. \ \ fc. t.)

~t~

OC.1 1~ 11l\'!, •so ORDERED,/A ,Ii: =- s/fIE!/lr'··CI E.rw~S Ol-flCE Hon. Peter Moulton J.S:::~I -'IT]

CO\.H\r\'{NE~ ,<oRIZ ./ ! ,;/] •.•. ' ~'=:/ I', -,. J5I '!~. c. /

1·----~,_.:Jl~'iT - ,~-,J- .. .. :tlL

--~_.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MICHELLE E. GOULD as Executrix for theEstate of LEONARD C. HOUCK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 190324/2010

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

lOI/if ,2015

(/,(liudith A. Yavitz, E .DARGER ERR TE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Uni n Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor

10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~ .4~---on. Peter H. Moulton

FI1~E:DOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERf<'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARCIA TRUCKS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFWILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., AND MARCIATRUCKS, INDIVIDUALLY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 100771/03

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

U4ib.a.r (0 ,2015

a~Q~(~_Frank Ortiz, Esq. A:t>AN1 \24=\K"'C e)G _WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. I

Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

JudithA.~--------­DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016

(212) 452-5300 ~It.. %o.~

COu '['1; ~~----__ j()/;2b /!S,~ IV~Cz.s 0 lO/5L--H-o.t:-n-.-p-'et'-er-H-.M-o-u-lto-n----=1=-'7 / I ~* y,/YJrs'

0/Y.k- Of:';:::'I IC~

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

This Document Relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 107340101

MARCIA TRUCKS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFWILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., AND MARCIATRUCKS, INDIVIDUALLY

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

~be-r Co ,2015

~-.·-A-D-)t...-f.A--r-\2~A..-\\-C-f:-O­WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, E .DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~~------ 1j)~~·S1-Ion. Peter H. Moulton I 1f

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARCIA TRUCKS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFWILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., AND MARCIATRUCKS, INDIVIDUALLY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 119377/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

~-ft>.bifCo 2015------,

.Ffttnk Ortiz, Esq. ,AD~N' (2A:C..{O, esC/.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

Judith A. Yavitz, E q.DARGER ERRA TE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

J:-,{ ~~

Co °Cl ~... ,,)

~--..~-e.--=--=-.I"""~~-~---=---=--=-==-==-===----====.L...I.::...pi)I!do/lS 0ttVlyOz l 0 <?OO"",~j/Hon. Peter H. Moulton tV~/A. C:lfj.-Yj/h '\8

oIfj.- OJ;'F'.'I /C~

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARCIA TRUCKS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFWILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., AND MARCIATRUCKS INDIVIDUALLY

cNYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 100771103

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

J

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation

("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkC~h~:- ~ ,2015

~QJ~, Ffftfl:k Ortiz, E;i~-Jv-1-'J""'2'---w-~-~--'-C--=-=.J'""Q. Judith A. Ya . ,

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. / DARGER ERRANT YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC700 Broadway 116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

MARCIA TRUCKS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFWILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., AND MARCIATRUCKS INDIVIDUALLY

i.")

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

-----------------1 (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 107340/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., nlk/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,

nlk/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkC~'-Iv~~ <0 2015=-=----'--'=--------,

~;~-Sq-.-A...,....'D-A-,V\.----::ro~--M-::-~-I-G,-.)-)fi,.-.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. aDARGER ERRANT YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Amch Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, 4~ ===-- @j,)C/SHon. Peter H. Moulton

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ALICE GOLIGHTLY, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF JOHN GOLIGHTLY, AND ALICEGOLIGHTLY INDIVIDUALLY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

-----------------1 (Moulton, f?)

Index No: 112029/2008

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

,J

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkec~ C0 ,2015

aa~Qit. FIm1k OrtiZJiSq. L\bA M f2 A. t,::'Fo, C~ (), ,

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, Es .DARGER ERRANT YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, a =- --iQ/r9&! ,-(Hon. Peter H. Moulton ~. ! /.;)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ALICE GOLIGHTLY, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF JOHN GOLIGHTLY, AND ALICEGOLIGHTLY, INDIVIDUALLY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, f)Index No: 112029/2008

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation

("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkCt-wbe.- (9 ,2015

,~-;8it-.~-.... -.Z\r-b-A-N-1-.i?......AFro----:-::=-I-(,;:;.,,--~S="'Q:C-.­

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, s.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ALICE GOLIGHTLY, AS EXECUTRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF JOHN GOLIGHTLY, ANDALICE GOLIGHTLY, INDIVIDUALLY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, f>Index No: 112029/08

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

. ,J

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Oc+t.be.-r G 2015--=------,

~ ~-----iO/dCJ/O'-'Hon. Peter H. Moulton ! '- !'

~~qjL. At>i''''' I)MORj '=-St...WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER E TE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

This Document Relates to:

MARCIA TRUCKS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFWILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., AND MARCIATRUCKS INDIVIDUALLY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 119377/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation

("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

"pated: New Y9rk, New Yorkc>c--kher' (0 2015'---------,

Judith A. Yav}, q.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

Frank Ortiz,-Esq. ):>p. l\/\'~ AYt~

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 Broadway

New York, NY 10003 F \ LED(212) 558-5500

OC1 26 20\5TY CLERK'S OFFICE

COUN NEW YORK

SO ORDERED, ~--,=~,----========----!llJ!r;6/iSHon. Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARCIA TRUCKS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFWILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., AND MARCIATRUCKS INDIVIDUALLY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 107340/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation

("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

SO ORDERED,

Dated: New York, New YorkCkh=bu Co ,2015

Judith A. YlNLLo~IL:SUDARGER ERRAN YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

MARCIA TRUCKS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFWILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., AND MARCIATRUCKS INDIVIDUALLY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

--------------------\ (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 100771103

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

pated: New York, New YorkCc-fbber (0 20150-- ,

, PI mIk OrtIZ, . 4!>AM ~ ~--6, e;)'G.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavi , s.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 2ih Street, lih FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~~ ~ /ob-h/IJ/~erH. Moulton -d:j0 / (

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

MARCIA TRUCKS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFWILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., AND MARCIATRUCKS INDIVIDUALLY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

---------------------1 (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 119377/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkDc+obd Co 2015--'--------,

~; .. ~~.Lf!ce-... '. -Feaak O=;q-.-·-,4r-t>-A:-I-V\~Ij2r:""r:-,M;--=~::-::=~-: -E--=.)l;l=-· •

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. aVltDARGER E TE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, lih FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, /J::::7.?------Lft0Gj;ut"'~erH. Moulton /0'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

MARCIA TRUCKS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFWILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., AND MARCIATRUCKS INDIVIDUALLY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

---------------------j (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 107340/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

a%New York, New York.her cO ,2015

Judith A. Ya . , sq.DARGER E E YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

~ =-Hon. Peter H. Moulton

SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

MARCIA TRUCKS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFWILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., AND MARCIATRUCKS INDIVIDUALLY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

-------------------i (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 100771103

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkCt-\oh~ ~, ,2015

Judith A. Yavitz, E .DARGER ERRANT YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Amch Products, Inc.116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

/2=====-==--_. /00" liSHon. Peter H. Moulton 7C / J

SO ORDERED,

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

MARCIA TRUCKS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFWILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., AND MARCIATRUCKS INDIVIDUALLY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

-------------------i (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 119377/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., nlk/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,

nlk/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkCHuhe-.- <0 ,2015

~"

W~·Frank O=: -.-j"'-.!)A-/V-1-----:rc~A-Cfb=r-=-)-£-..)-";u-.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. . z, E .DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, /Z.!- ===-=---=-= (0~~SHon. Peter H. Moulton ~ I'

SUPREME COURT OI! 'lllE STArE OF NEW YORI(COUNT'V OF NEW YORK_.__.--_._._~-.~~ -_.__..--_ __ .__._---_ .

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCALASBESTOS LITIGATION ; I.A.S. Part 50

.. _................ _..__ _._._ __ _._.....................~ eMouIto11, P)This Document Relates to:

i Index No.: 190385/09

VITO F'RANCIS BLUNDA~ NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, detcndant, Madsen & Howell, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

111 the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules ~ 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Madsen & Howell, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Madsen & Howell, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New' York .. NC\'Ii York..QLJ:a~:l, 20 15

----------------_._.._------Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Vito Francis BlundaWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091

KelTY oj,ll).JY.L,42 )ok, Esq.Attorney for DefendantMadsen & 1·lowelL Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUur::R, P.e.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, L~t! --z:. Hon. Peter H. Moulton

OCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK

eeT

SUPREME COURT OF THE S'l'Al'E OF Nr~W YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

~~""~'-"'-------'-'-'------"~""-"".~"'--"---- ......--.-IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : l.A.S. Part 50

....._.....__.... ..._._._.._._._ ...._..... _" ..... __.. j (Moulton, P.)This Document Relates to:

\ Index No.: 190385/09

VITO FRANCIS BLUNDA: NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: .JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

----_._-'

WHEREFORE, defendant, New York Protective Coverings, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against deiendant, New York Protective Coverings, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims ancl cross claims against

defendant, New York Protective Coverings, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: Nc\-v York, Nev.'! York_(2cl-ok'l> l!i., 2015

Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Vito Francis BlundaWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, PA.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091

Kerryal1l --,--;:e(-..<~-r)k-,-E-s(-l.-----·-----·

Attorney for DefendantNew York Protective CoveringsMCGIVNEY & KLUCER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, __~~- -'Ef&JSL I'lon, Petcr H. Moulton

2177-2/4

COUNTY CLEF{K'S OFFICENEW YORK

'T'his Document Relates to:

SUPREML~ COURT OF THE STArE OF NF~W YORKCOUN'T'Y 01" NEW YORK..._---_._~~~---_._ .._---_._-----,--.,,-...._.... _. , ..

IN RE: NEW YORK COUN'fYASBESTOS LITIGATION

: NYCAL: LAS. Part 50

....._ _.__ _._............................... : (M0 UIt0 n, P,),

i Index No.: 128517/95

Lours CAFARO; NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: .JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., hereby requests summary judgment

111 the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules ~ 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: Nev.'! York, New YorkQC}t!QtcLt.f-, 2015

Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintin{s)Louis CafaroWILENTZ, GOU)l\1AN & SPITZER, P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091

Kerr ~uoM~" ~ook, Esq.Attorney j~)I" DefendantJohn W. Wallace & Co.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, _~~/-~=======--.L.I'::.f-luPCJ ~6"'7"Ho.ffI~· H. Moulton /'

SIl2·CiSOE

OCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK'~) OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF 1'1-11:: S'l'A'fr:: OF NEW YORKCOUN'rY or: NEW YORK._._--._._----_.__._--.----..._- .._-~_ .._...._-IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : l.A.S. Part 50.. _ __ _ _. . .__ j (Moulton, P.)

: NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: .JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

This Document Relates to:

PAUL COLLINSAND

JANE COLLINS

~ Index No.: 190099/08

WHEREFORE, dctendant, New York Protective Coverings Industries, Inc., hereby

requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

§ 3212, dismissing plaintiff'>' complaint against defendant, NeVi York Protective Coverings

Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, New York Protective Coverings Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Kerryan . ,.,.(.;(:} <., Esq.Attorney for DefendantNew York Protective Coverings fndustries, Inc.McGIvNEY & KLUGER, P.c.80 Broad Street-Suite 230()New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Kush Shukla, EsC].Attorney for Plaintiflts)Paul Collins and Jane CollinsWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SprraR, P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038·3901(212) 267-3091

Dated: New York, New YorkOLWI~' ILf-,2015 /

.' ,./

//~.. /£I/'/--­/

----------------.__.--

SO ORDERED,~ . ... "._,__...-,-/oIaCJ~'S-L Hon. Peter H. Moulton / ~ / r

2177-2110

OCT 'J 6 "''"'1r""L LU :J

COUNTY CLERK'S OFF' ~.NEW

ICE.YORK

SUPRrnvlE COUR'r OF THE STA'l'E OF NEW YORKCOUN'T'Y OF NEW YORK_._..-_ _._-.._----_._ .. ~.._-, -.-.-._..••..-.. " -._ _-----_.__..-IN RE: NEW YORI( COUNTY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : LAoS. Part 50__; (Moulton P.)

·Ti~j~--i5()cu~~le;_tJfciatcs-t~;~-----·----- ..-..-· ........-.......-----~ Index No.: 104179198

RICHARD W. CONNELL!NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY; JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

_. __ .-.._--'

WHEREFORE. defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against de1endant, John W. Wallace & Co., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-delendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with pr~iudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkO(;Jn~~ l./_, 2015

------------Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiflts)Richard W. ConnellWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPJT7.ER, P.A.110 William Street. 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091

--tP"----#------...----------.----.-.-

Kerr 2mtrl,,''L Cook, Esq,Attorney for DefendantJohn W. Wallace & Co.MCGIvNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300Nev.,' York, New York 10004(2 12) 509-3456

SO ORDERED_ /C/------=_==.~___rf~~-i;cterH. Moulton

OCT ;, 6 ')r.'~5.. LlH

COUNTY CLEov-<" '._ c_nr\ -..) ( It',....

NEW YORK -- -,

(

582-6731"

SUPREME COURT OF '1'1·11': STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-~_.,----_._---_._._.-._...._~ ....-...-.... " ......•-•.... ' .._.' ..__._.

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCALASBESTOS UTICJATION : l.A.S. Part 50

_. _ _.._. ...._._......_ _ _~ (M 0 til ton P.)This Document Relates to:

: Index No.: 113573/96

WILLIAM DUFFY: NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkO~kbtr- I~_., 2015

_ ..._-----------Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffts)William DuffyWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P,A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091

/~~Ker~~=-M...;...~.....;...'--.-----.-

Attorney for DefendantJohn W. Wallace & Co.MCGIVNEY & KLlJCJER, P.e.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, ~--::::::============__)0(db lis--z.~~cterH. Moulton ~~ I'

582·6581'

OCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK;S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_¥_._. ~_ .._.".~ ... ,~....__..~_ .._. __. ....__.__. 'M

IN RE: NEW YORK COUN'T'Y : NYCALASBESTOS LITIGATION i LA.S. Part 50

._ __ ._._.--! (M0 ul to Jl, P.)This Document Relates to:

j Index No.: ]04 J56/01

AN'TlIONY PRANOi NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law ancl Rules § 32 J2, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., be and the same arc hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

._-----Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiH{s)Anthony PranoWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A.I J0 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York ]0038-3901(2 J2) 267-3091

~.,.-,....,-~--

Ken·)~~,~:·"2o~iZEsq. ------

Attorney for DefendantJohn W. Wallace & Co,MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, p.e.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(2] 2) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,._~-====-=- (Dbit? 1;5. Hon. Peter H. Moulton ~v If

F'lF;~:D""''''-OCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLEPK'C'- C"F., 0 'FICE

NEW YORK

51l2·7JOf)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION---------------------------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:

RALPH N. BORELLI AND ANNE BORELLI,

Plaintiff(s),

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

-against-Index No.: 108709/2001

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTIN G& SUPPLY), et aI.,

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Kirst Alford Kneis, Esq.K& GATES LLP

orneys for DefendantRANECO.

599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

SO ORDEREDL2 ====-==--- {u~1~Hon. Peter H. Moulton I 7 I

Matthew Macintyre, Es .WEITZ & LUXE G, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: O~JoeVe .JotS-New York, Ne'JYork

OCT 26 20i5

COUNTY CLERf<'S CJFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION---------------------------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:

ISABEL CONROY, as Administratrix for theEstate of JAMES H. CONROY and ISABELCONROY, Individually,

Plaintiff(s),

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 123322/2002-against-

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aI., JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Kirste Alford Kneis, Esq.K& GATES LLP

orneys for DefendantRANECO.

599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: {J~bu~ (20/~-New York, New York

~!')~\~~,-JL:~~

"- Frank M. 01 ti~, Egq.. AD~M QAff10, t:: .J""Q.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, ----,-/}",,---o._X"'----------===---'==---==---.L-/Dh(b I;~­~Peter H. Moult~- I~ I'

Fit. DOCT Z6 2015

COUNTY CLEfiK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION---------------------------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:

KENNETH CARBOY and MARTHA P.CARBOY,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et aI.,

Defendants.

: NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No: 107007-02

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

---------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Ct-Jcb~- '2 I lOI t;"New York, New York

~~. ;E;~q .1\"'"", ~A,\w, <3SQ. . nAlfO~qWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. .. Q K GATES LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s) \, ~ ttorneys for Defendant700 Broadway ~ \ ~ ~ CRANE CO.New York, NY 10003 l" 1.~ 1..\) G't;. 599 Lexington Avenue(212) 558-5500 ~~\ 'f:S O~~\ New York, NY 10022-6030

:0 O__'t;.'0;?-y-- (212) 536-3900C00~ ~'t;.~"{

SO ORDERED, LZ ~/07c}0/ISZ Hon. Peter H. Moulton ~ <

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION---------------------------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:

KENNETH CARBOY and MARTHA P.CARBOY,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al.,

Defendants.

: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50

(Han. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No: 115364-02

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

---------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Oc40b<.r ~ ,~D I SNew York, New York

(QLC12~H ~...Erank M. Ortiz, E~ A''i:>AM \?.aRro, € SG- .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) ,;,,::.. Q700 Broadway \ :;:.,.New York, NY 10003 e. \ ~ ~~(212) 558-5500 ~:\ 'L~ 1.u -f cc New York, NY 10022-6030

()C \!'S O~\ \ (212) 536-3900\....t:..\-\r'- \!

~-0 C ,,<O?\r'-./'lhP'0 ~t:..'-N

SO ORDERED,~ ~~~I;~I Hon. Peter H. Moulton /'

tmA~t?%SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------J(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------J(This document relates to:

HENRY DAWSON

------------------------------------------------------------------------J(

NYCAL1. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f1Index No.: 113467/98

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant JOHN CRANE, INC. ("JOHN CRANE") requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against JOHN CRANE, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

JOHN CRANE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember _, 2015

N cho ack, sq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

Suzanne Halbardier~ Esq.Barry MCTiem~'& oore2 Rector St.New York, NY 1 06Counsel for John Crane, Inc.

{00366625.DOCX}

F I L·l.. ~~': D/'"(llk'lri.ll;I~ ,I.

OCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERI-('S OFFICENEW YORK

trYI~~U1W

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------J(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGAnON

-----------------------------------------------------------------------J(This document relates to:

JOSEPH LANZA

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCAL1. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f)Index No.: 101155/98

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant JOHN CRANE, INC. ("JOHN CRANE") requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against JOHN CRANE, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

JOHN CRANE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember ,2015

Suzanne H'alp1dier, Esq.Barry McTie~ & Moore2 Rector St. __ VNew York, NY 10006Counsel for John Crane, Inc.

n"~

(m AA21q 1:>

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

HOWARD WALDMAN

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f)

Index No.: 101219/01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant JOHN CRANE, INC. ("JOHN CRANE") requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against JOHN CRANE, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

JOHN CRANE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember 015

c ovack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

Suzanne ~baidier, Esq.Barry MCTie~'" & Moore2 Rector St. \New York, N !JI0006Counsel for John Crane, Inc.

SOORDERED /Rr ~~01;-::,-r~r H. Moulton I /

OCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

~mPrL.j2'lg'1SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGAnON

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

FRANCIS SHEEHAN

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCAL1. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, p>

Index No.: 102121101

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant JOHN CRANE, INC. ("JOHN CRANE") requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against JOHN CRANE, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

JOHN CRANE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember_,2015

ichola ack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

(Suzanne Hc¥~ardier, Esq.Barry MCTfer1Ian & Moore2 Rector sL )New York!J4Y 10006Counsel for John Crane, Inc.

tlYlA4?1 ItSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

DANIEL SALVATORE

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, ~

Index No.: 112401/01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant JOHN CRANE, INC. ("JOHN CRANE") requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against JOHN CRANE without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

JOHN CRANE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

)

(

Suzanne Halbardler, Esq.Barry MCTiel1,'f. Moore2 Rector St. .New Yark, N 0006Counsel for John Crane, Inc.

SO ORDERED,~ --==-~sl-HOll:Peter H. Moulton-

COUNTY CLEFn<'S OFFICENEW YORK

,X:CLB/59514/legal/NOSJM/march2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------------------------------------)(WILFRED L. HINES, JR. and NOREEN ANN HINES,

Plaintiff(s),

- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.;

Defendants.-----------------------------------------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Index No.: 116038/06

NYCALLA.S. Part~So

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.C'~beA ~JcXC/~

Q(n~/L ',_'-fuaRk Olt,Z,~3q"';"- Ai)AiYl iJ')4-F('lJ, e-l~

Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

f

X:FBW/34835/legal/NOSJMmarch2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------)(WILFRED L. HINES, JR. and NOREEN ANN HINES,

Plaintiff(s),

- against-

A.a. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.;

Defendants.-----------------------------------------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Index No.: 116038/06

NYCALLA.S. Part)Rf~O

prejudice and without costs.Cc-Iob-er ([) ).3-0Jt;

-F~~~AbAM{2AFfO, £::,<;;J..Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

Charles Neal, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SOORDERED,~ ~~I;~BOIl. Sherry Klein-Heitler TI

8OlIl.:mrB!ur.MOUL~N' L E QOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLEliK'S OFFICENEW YORK

~tBo I'-1'\ClSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------------------------------------------------------------J(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------J(This document relates to:

FRANCIS SHEEHAN

------------------------------------------------------------------------J(

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, p)

Index No.: 102121101

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS INC. ("CLEAVER-BROOKS") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against CLEAVER-BROOKS, without prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

CLEAVER-BROOKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember _, 2015

i as Nov ck, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Ave, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

Suzanne Halb~dier, Esq.Barry, McTi¢m' & Moore

t2 Rector St 14New York, Y 1 006Counsel for aver-Brooks Inc.

A"lj-~II\SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

DANIEL SALVATORE

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f>

Index No.: 112401/01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant ATLAS TURNER, INC. ("ATLAS") requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiff s complaint against ATLAS without prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

ATLAS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember_, 2015

~LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

Suzanne Halb . r, Esq.Barry McTie Moore2 Rector St.New York, NY 10006Counsel for Atlas Turner, Inc.

6'YIAloN\<)SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGAnON

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

JOSEPH ERRICHIELLO

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, fJ

Index No.: 110443/00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant JOHN CRANE, INC. ("JOHN CRANE") requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against JOHN CRANE, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

JOHN CRANE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember _, 2015

icholas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

Suzanne Hrtlbardier, Esq.Barry MeTiernaI1 & Moore2 Rector St. '" INew York, NY'ig006Counsel for John Crane, Inc.

~ ~bfsHon. Peter H. Moulton

CLf10\'-KloSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGAnON

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

JOSEPH ERRICHIELLO

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCAL1. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f)

Index No.: 110443/00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Suzanne H'¥lbard.ier:)Esq.Barry, Mc~ma~Moore2 Rector St # 14·New York, NY 10006Counsel for Cleaver-Brooks Inc.

WHEREAS, Defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS INC. ("CLEAVER-BROOKS") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against CLEAVER-BROOKS, without prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

CLEAVER-BROOKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember _,2015

ichol ovack, Esq.Y KONIGSBERG, LLP

800 Third Ave, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Pia' tiff

~~

Y.. \ \1,. \i~;Wl¢JI' l~"""

. 1~ l\\\~

0(.1 ","S offICIO SO ORDEREK? ==------------..!!!/?~O\J~\'< C~~~;BY- Hon. Peter H. Moulton.

C ~€'"

U'YIPr (iiIY,\'t-SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------------------------------------------------------------J(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------J(This document relates to:

JOHN J. MURPHY

------------------------------------------------------------------------J(

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, .f.}

Index No.: 115028/01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant JOHN CRANE, INC. ("JOHN CRANE") requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against JOHN CRANE without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

JOHN CRANE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Suzanne Halhard~er, Esq.Barry McTiem¥ & Moore2 Rector St. Q/\New York, NY( 0006Counsel for Jo n Crane, Inc.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember

Ni ho as ovack, sq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plainti

( \

~\\i~~SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGAnON

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f)

Index No.: 115028/01

JOHN J. MURPHY

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS INC. ("CLEAVER-BROOKS") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against CLEAVER-BROOKS, without prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

CLEAVER-BROOKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without

costs.

(Suzanne Halbar er, Esq.Barry, McTiem n Moore2 Rector St # 14New York, NY 10006Counsel for Cleaver-Brooks Inc.

~;Rrrtaas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Ave, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plai~f(

\,.,tj~

f \ \'" 11l~~\ '1~ '(:'r\(~ ORDERED,~ ====---=-=-!r-) /:JG k~ -p\x(S u' \ Hon. Peter H. Moulton 1 <.. i'-

O.-"e> ?\f-cO\J~-0~~\l'l 'iO

X:/FBW/46119/legal/february2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------------------------------------)(ROBERT F. TERRY and JANET TERRY,

Plaintiff(s),

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

- against- Index No.: 118317/02

A.C. & S, Inc., et al.

Defendants.-----------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCALLA.S. Part)6 :s()

WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.Vcfc:tx-r cb I ,3.01 ~-

QJ2~Charles Neal, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

FilEDOCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

so ORDERED,~K1ein-lIe~~o//S

.JION.PBTERH.MOULTON

CLB59382/legal/nosjrn/february20 15

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------)(ROBERT F. TERRY and JANET TERRY,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S. INC., et al.,

Defendant(s),-----------------------------------------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Index No.: 118317/02

NYCAL ."­LA.S. Part~ S-u

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.O(~hu- 4-) iX 61 t;-

O ·j).-e-l. F! anK OrtIZ, E~-~··-:"'L\-~-A-Nl---"""~~ t-2~ E~L.J... Shawnetfe-FfUl ,

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for DefendantWeitz & Luxenberg CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.700 Broadway cO'· Barry McTiernan & MooreNew York, New York 1~3 \ \.. t:;. 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor

r New York, New York 10006oel 1u1Q\~ (212) 313-3600

Ol/'S OffICE.

~CLE.Pi"

N \N '{ORK '0)soORDERED,~€ .=-------- (0 :J...(p r;S"Mon. Sherry Klem-Mertlef---.

ilON~PEl'ERH.MOULTON.

X:/FBW/43957/legal/march2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------J{JEAN AMBROSINO,

Plaintiff(s),

- against-

A.C. & S, Inc., et al.

Defendants.-----------------------------------------------------------------J{

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Index No.: 112729/01

NYCALLA.S. Part}(fS (J

WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.C)c~ be.; <0, dOl ~

G~Q~·'fi'rank OftizJ4l-.~AIt-~-AM-e----,~...,.I\;:-M-~, em.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Charles Neal, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

so ORDERED,~ Ibl;lf,y I;s-. . tierry Klem-H~itRr 'I C ! I

HON. PBrERH. MOULTON FIB R:' DI (AS ~:: L

OCT 26 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

t-rltA-~l.lo{PlSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

SANTIAGO MENDEZ

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f{)

Index No.: 115899/98

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant JOHN CRANE, INC. ("JOHN CRANE") requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against JOHN CRANE, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

JOHN CRANE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

.~NIcholas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

Suzanne Halb~dier, Esq.Barry McTie~hn& Moore2 Rector St. flNew York, M.Y 10006Counsel for John Crane, Inc.

SOORDERE~ ====. {o/:;){~!5:. Hon. Peter H. Moulton 7

FI~ [·!'~D'. ,'I •.~\'x:.u I,l .." L"".:, ,•..

OCT 26 2015

COUNTY ClEr-!l-('S OFFICENEW YORK .

tl'h Pt~"S \Y\SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

WESTON REED

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, p)

Index No.: 104333/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant JOHN CRANE, INC. ("JOHN CRANE") requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against JOHN CRANE, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

JOHN CRANE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember _, 2015

I'\(H'·.I:k'1las Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

(

"':"

Suzanne HaU1~lfdier, Esq.Barry McTi~maJ & Moore2 Rector St. VNew York, NY 10006Counsel for John Crane, Inc.

I\lT3SI"1L)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGAnON

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

WESTON REED

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f>Index No.: 104333/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant ATLAS TURNER, INC ("ATLAS TURNER") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against ATLAS TURNER, without prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

ATLAS TURNER, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

~Nicholas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

AjT~~)0

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------------------------------------------------------------J(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGAnON

-----------------------------------------------------------------------J(This document relates to:

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f)

Index No.: 101155/98

JOSEPH LANZA

------------------------------------------------------------------------J(

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant ATLAS TURNER, INC ("ATLAS TURNER") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiff's complaint against ATLAS TURNER, without prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

ATLAS TURNER, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

/Suzanne Halbafdi~r, Esq.Barry MCTieni:1· Moore2 Rector St. "New York, NY 006Counsel for Atlas Turner, Inc.

-----

Nic ovack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember _, 2015_

--~------

A"TT~1.,) L)SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, p>

Index No.: 113467/98

HENRY DAWSON NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

WHEREAS, Defendant ATLAS TURNER, INC ("ATLAS TURNER") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against ATLAS TURNER, without prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

ATLAS TURNER, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Suzanne Halbar¢ie{, Esq.

Barry MCTiem\J'oore2 Rector St.New Yark, NY 6Counsel for Atlas Turner, Inc.

IC 0 as Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plainti

C\, \. ~~~ 1"~

C\ 1~ l'U\~G . Off\CE ,

CI.__EBY5 ,CODNn'NE'J'J ,<oBlZ

so ORD RED, ---+~L--======~;;;'::':J!J.~

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember _, 2_0_15 __

{00366617.DOCX}

ATII.f~nJSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(In Re: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

SALVATORE GRECO

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, p)Index No.: 116211/01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant ATLAS TURNER, INC. ("ATLAS") requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiff s complaint against ATLAS, without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

ATLAS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember _, 2015

IC olas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

-- /;"

\"\

Suzanne Halhardier, Esq.Barry MCTieni.fn & Moore2 Rector St. ( JNew York, NJf 10006Counsel for Atlas Turner, Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------------- )(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

--------------------------------------------------------------------- )(ELSENE A. BARTLETT, : Index Nos. 114328/2002

10740412002Plaintiff,

-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.c. and S., INC., et ai.,

Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------------- )(

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and

Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Ne)XYork, Ne: Y.?rk \ _Cc+t:>~ (Q)~,I C;

WEITZ & LU)(ENBERG P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: New York, New York

1",I

1.

Attorneys for DefendantsThe Goodyear Tire & Rubber C mpany andGoodye ; Canada Inc..5>-By: l(..{.t. v .

Lawrence G. Le~

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018

F , \"", E3)6-2400

Oel t. 6 20'S

~TY CLERK'S OFFlff ~/. N~ 10 rJ-bjlS ,Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.c.

SO ORDERED:

caJ~LBy: _

·~t~:~· ~~~.;~~.,700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-against-

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK--------------------------------------------------------------------- )(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION--------------------------------------------------------------------- )(

RALPH A. MINERVINO and ANN P. ROBINSON as . Index Nos. 122185/1999Executors for the Estate of JOSEPH L. MINERVINO, 10924712000

Plaintiffs,

A.C. and S., INC., et ai.,

Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------------- )(

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50

I

WEITZ & LU)(ENBERG P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP

Attorneys for DefendantsThe Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company andGe.od ear C ' ada Inc. 9

'--I1'--I"I./'~ ------,LLU(~,c..-//Lawrence G. Lee,

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018

F I t:21f~30D400 fTi'

OCT 26 2015 I

4 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC~ I. _I. I'~ 10;9-&/15

HILPeter H. Moulton, lS.C.

Dated: New York, New York

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SO ORDERED:

, Sc700 BroadwNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

. Index No. 190066/2008

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------------- )(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION--------------------------------------------------------------------- )(THOMAS DOUGHERTY,

NYCAL

Plaintiff,

-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.--------------------------------------------------------------------- )(

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPI

WEITZ & LU)(ENBERG P.C.

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and

Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yo~r.,N/w YorkIO~ll?Jl~

/2.COUNTY CLEliK'S OFFIC.E, l_ NEW~(D/~0!S"

Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

Attorneys for DefendantsThe Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company andGoodyear anada Inc. ~ ,

>--I'~"""'Y: '{"I"U"-L -~Lawrence G. Lee, Es

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018

Fit.. f~2)"-2400

OCT ~ 6 2015

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SO ORDERED:

By: ---"---=---,~L...L::~..o....::-~~~~

JSUZA700!~roadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------------- )(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

--------------------------------------------------------------------- )(SANDRA W. CAPOGNA, Individually and as Executrixfor the Estate of ARMOND 1. CAPOGNA, : Index No. 104329/2000

Plaintiffs,

-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.C. and S., INC., et ai., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50

Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------------- )(

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and

Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

------'\----JP~Ja ,-r­WEITZ & LU)(ENBERG P.C.

Attorneys for DefendantsThe Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and

GOod;(earla.nada Inc... r:; / 1

~/J//L.By: / : t-C.(..-<"C " :1:/

Lawrence G. Lee, q.

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018

F I ~ (2~J3~400at.. l",." .. U

OCT 26 2015 I

ICOUNTY CLERI<'S OFFICE , /, !/Z': ~JE~ "lo'-b,ft;; 10 1

( Hon. Peter H. Moulton, 1.S.C....z;- I

SO ORDERED:

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

~:Matthew T. MacIntYre, Esq.

=Pt1(J/\ A N[ftrMD700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Plaintiff(s),

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------J(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

---------------------------------------------------------------J(ESTHER SHEMBERG, Individually and as Index No. 190221110Executrix of the Estate ofZEV SHEMBERG,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et a!.,

Defendants.

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50

---------------------------------------------------------------J(

WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New YOrkl

New YorkIDr/~/(S

LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs

.-----/-

800 Third Avenue,New York, New Yark 10022(212) 605-6200

Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC

Lawrence G.

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

SO ORDERED: d'= ::-------... /opCJ/10­Hon. Peter H. Moulton, ts:e; I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------J(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

---------------------------------------------------------------J(MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate of Index No. 19040611 0PATRICK 1. SLEVIN,

Plaintiff,

-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

AW. CHESTERTON CO., INC., et al.,Han. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------J(

WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New Yor:, New YorkIOl!~ I(~

i i

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for PlaintifL _ Attorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC

BY:~-BY:~Nicholas E. Novack, Esq. Scott R. Emery, Esq.

SO ORDERED:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

---------------------------------------------------------------)(PETER SCIARABBA, as Executor of the Estate of: Index No. 190103110KATHLEEN ROSLYN SCIARABBA,

Plaintiff,

-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., et aI.,Han. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------)(

I 7

WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkIQ/16/1~

LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff _-_

800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC

BY:~Scott R. Emery, Esq.

264 West 40 th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

SO ORDERED:~ ~/E#;s/Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. I

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff(s),

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------.---------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-------------------------------.-------------------------------)(EVELYN B. SMITE-I, Individually and as Personal Index No. 190115/10Representative of the Estate of JAMES RICHARDSMITH,

-against-

A.W. CHESTERTON CO., INC., et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------)(

WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York(0/10/15

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

800 Third Avenue,New York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

Dated: New York, New York

LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP

::o~ ::meys for Defend~t Goor~a-P~ific LLC, Nicholas E. Novack, Esq.

SO ORDERED: 7~ =jOI.2tf~on:Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff(s),

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------- ----.------------------------J{IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS UTIGAnON

----------------------------------------------------.----------J{JUDITH KALLESTEN OAKLEY, Individually and: Index No. 190131/09as Administrator of the Estate of SPENCEROAKLEY,

-against-

ANCHOR PACKING CO., et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------.J{

r I

WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York/0/16 /15

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

800 Third Avenue,New York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP

Attorneys::7j' lX-----~u:~ Defendant GeOr;~;LLC

By: By: ~-lr(._ ~~_.Nicholas E. Novack, Esq. Lawrence G. Lee, Esq.

I: II, t.:: DOcr" I.".",

COUNty (.' G2015N~~E:IY/'\'s

'y0R/f Of:f:IC~

SO ORDERED: ~ ==-4~/rsz:..iI0:Peteri-I. Moulton, J.S.C.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Plaintiff(s),

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGAnON

---------------------------------------------------------------xMILTON O. KARL, Individually and as Index No. 190002/09Administrator of the Estate ofIRWIN GOODMAN,:

-against-

ABEX CORP., et ai., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------X

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC

( 7LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs

WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York(O//b/,?'

Nicholas E. Novack, Esq.By: --'-"-------=------b-'~=

Dated: New York, New York

800 Third Avenue,New York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

SO ORDERED:

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

a ~d-o//~flon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.