Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · AMERICAN OVERSEAS MARINECORP, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, by itssuccessor-in-interest, ... 2004) hereby requests summary …

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xKALLIOPIDEBONERAS, as Administratrix for the estateof SPYRANGELOS DEBONERAS, and KALLIOPIDEBONERAS, Individually,

Plaintiff(s),

Index No.: 190077/2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION,as successor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.,

ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY,ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA (ALCOA),AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC.,n/k/a RHONE POULENC AG COMPANY,n/k/a BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC.,

AMERICAN OVERSEAS MARINE CORP,BORG-WARNER CORPORATION,by its successor-in-interest,BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC.,

BW/IP, INC. AND ITS WHOLLY OWNEDSUBSIDIARIES,CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a VIACOM INC.,

successor by merger to

CBS CORPORATION, f/k/aWESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION,

CEMEX, INC.,CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.,CERTAINTEED CORPORATION,CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,Individually, and as successor to UNITED BRANDSCOMPANY, as successor to UNITED FRUIT COMPANY,

EMPIRE-ACE INSULATIONMFG. CORP.,FARRELL LINES, INC.,f/k/a AMERICAN EXPORT CO.,

FLOWSERVEUS, INC.Solely as Successor to Rockwell Manufacturing Company,EdwardValve, Inc.,NordstromValves, Inc.,EdwardVogtValve Company, and Vogt Valve Company,

FMC CORPORATION,on behalfof its former CHICAGO PUMP& NORTHERNPUMP BUSINESSES,

FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,GARDNER DENVER, INC.,GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,

f \JVJL 01 A®

0FF\C£

1

GOULDS PUMPS, INC.,HAPAG-LLOYD (AMERICA), INC.,IMO INDUSTRIES, INC.,,INDEPENDENCE MARITIME AGENCY, INC.,ITT INDUSTRIES, INC.,Individually, and as successor toBELL & GOSSETT COMPANY andas successor to KENNEDY VALVE MANUFACTURINGCo., Inc.,,

MAERSK B.V., FORMERLY NEDLLOYD LINES B.V.,and/or P&O NEDLLOYD B.V.,

MARINE TRANSPORT LINES,MORMAC MARINETRANSPORT, INCIndividually, and as Successor to MOORE-McCORMACKBULK TRANSPORT and MOORE-McCORMACKLINES,

NATIONAL BULK CARRIERS,O.M.S. OVERSEAS MARINE SERVICES LLC,OVERSEAS MARINE CORPORATION,OVERSEAS MARINE MANAGEMENT LTD.,OVERSEAS MARINE SERVICES, INC.,OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.,P&ONEDLLOYD LINES,B.V.,Individually and as successor in interestto FARRELL LINES, Inc.,

PFIZER, INC. (PFIZER),TROJAN MARITIME, INC,U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL),UNIONCARBIDE CORPORATION,UNIVERSE TANKSHIPS,WARREN PUMPS,LLC,WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORPORATIONMARINE TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC.Individually and as successor to OVERSEAS MARINESERVICES, INC.,

Defendants.

--------..----------------— . —X

WHEREAS, defendant Overseas Marine Services, Inc. (which the New York State,

Department of State, Division of Corporations' Corporation and Business Entity Database

identifies as having DOS ID # 3114591 and as having an Initial DOS FilingDate of October 18,

2

2004) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Overseas Marine Services,

Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Overseas Marine Services, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

A. RomanelliChristopher A. RomanelliWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NewYork 10003Tel. 212-557-5500

Alan Van PraagEdwardW. FloydEATON& VAN WINKLE LLP3 Park AvenueNew York, New York 10016Tel. 212-779-9910

Attorneysfor Plaintiffs Attorneysfor Defendant Overseas MaritimeServices, Inc.

SO ORDERED,HON. MOMLfnaj

JBDN.PETERH.MOULTON

FJUL 07 2015

.TV CLERKS OFFICE

3


INRE:NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

X

NYCAL

I.A.S. PART 50

ÿ (Moulton, 3,)

James Deaboid, INDEXNO. 190310-2014

Plaintiff(s), (Weitz & Luxenberg PC/April 2015InExtremis Trial Cluster)

-against-

A.O. Smith Water Products Co., Inc.,et al.,

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTSINC.

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto;

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkFebruary _72Q 15 Juÿe ÿ *-/ 1c'5

Richard P. O'Leary, Esq.Troutman Sanders LLP

Ambre Bilndis,Esq.Weitz & luxenberg Troutman Sanders LLP

The Chrysler Building700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffJames Deaboid

405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc. clEBksoff\ce

SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton

6//5T

Active 2-4784995v I2445S-1.0OK

Supreme Court of the Stateof NewYorkCounty of New York

InRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

HERMANANDERSON AND DONNA ANDERSON,Individually and as Husband and Wife

Plaintiffs

- against -

ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC., et. al.

_Defendants_

New York AsbestosLitigation(NYCAL)

Index No. 190085/2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Navistar, Inc. i/s/h/a "Navistar, Inc. and International Truck and

Engine Corporation" ("Navistar"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-titled case, pursuant

to CPLR §3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against defendant, Navistar, along with all cross-claims

against it, with prejudice, there being no opposition hereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,

International Truck and Engine Corporation, (now by operation of name change only known as Navistar,

Inc.), be and the sanÿe are hereby dismissed with prejudice without costs.

Dated:l:

Cellino & Baprfes, P.C£

ByJoeÿA/Vasquez, EsquireAttorneys for Plaintiff

/yA20 Lexington AveNew York, NY 10170

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC,// um, Qf

ElizabÿhA. Weill, EsquireAttorneys for Defendant,Navistar, Inc., (i/s/h/a Navistar, Inc.and International Truck andCorporation50 S. 16th Street, 22nd FloorTwo Liberty PlacePhiladelphia, PA 19102

SO ORDERED:

x IP

Date:on. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

4&2lJ15

Supreme Court of the State of New YorkCounty of New York

In RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION


ROBERT V. KESAR AND MARILYN KESAR,

Plaintiffs

- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

_Defendants

New York AsbestosLitigation (NYCAL)

Index No. 190020-15

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

WHEREFORE, defendant, Navistar, Inc., ("Navistar") hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-titled case, pursuant to CPLR §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaintagainst defendant, Navistar, along with all cross-claims against it,with prejudice, there being no

opposition hereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, Navistar, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice without costs.

Dated: U j 1 1

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.LLC

By: VcCkN3Patti Burshtyn, EsquireAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

By:_

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott,

'/(jmIaM UJMElizabeth A. Weill, EsquireAttorneys for Defendant,Navistar, Inc.50 S. 16th Street, 22nd Floor*Two Liberty Place ÿ \ <

Philadelphia, PA 1ÿ02 Tw3

coO09*SO ORDERED:

J.S.C.

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

s~JUhj 252015

NYs partsoCOURT - CIVIL


INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

ANNE NOLAN,

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f.)

Index No.: 190117/2014

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiffs,

-against-

AERCO INTERNATIONAL, et al.,

_Defendants._

WHEREFORE, defendant Oakfabco, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant Oakfabco, Inc.with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,


defendant Oakfabco, Inc,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: NewYork,New YorkMay

a L.Drozdkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLPrneys for Defendantfabco, Inc.

600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 897-9655

SO ORDERED,

niiamsThe Williams Law FirmP.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffAnne Nolan245 Park Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 668-1122

sp-s pr.rr- - K. JLjU <J

H. MOULfeNJSC.

ÿ \ V




WALLACE S. HANKINAND HELENHANKIN,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„including OAKFABCO, INC.

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S.PartÿT5"ÿ

Index No.: 190054/2015



entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Oakfabco, Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,



Dated: New York, New YorkMay / ,120ÿ5 Q/f/l5

- c

MamewMÿQumnHawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLPtttorneys for Defendant

Oakfabco, Inc.600 LexingtonAvenue, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 897-9655

SO ORDERED,

Suzanne/Ml RatcliffeWeitz <SjLLuxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsWallace S. Hankinand HelenH700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500 COÿ

Jun

iti.PETER H.Mod/S Nys

2sttl5rs°c°f/?r.CA/n




WALTER CUNNINGHAM AND EVA SUECUNNINGHAM,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

AERCO INTERNATIONAL, et al., includingOAKFABCO, INC.

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S.Partÿob

Index No.: 190136/2014



entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Oakfabco, Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,



Dated: New York, New YorkMay 2015

lav kins Parnell Thackston & Young LLPprneys for Defendantcfabco, Inc.

TOO LexingtonAvenue, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 897-9655

SO ORDERED,

Josephv. WilliamsThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsWalter Cunningham and Eva245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

c \ \.ÿV $6

1ViV Ksofflc*

jun 25 ?0I5NYs

hON.¥>tTER H MOULtOho iV

: C°URr .CIVIL


x

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALHon. Peter H. Moulton

ÿx

CHARLES WATROS andSARAH WATROS, Index No.: 190293/2013

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-against-

AERCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.,including GATES CORPORATION,

Defendants.

—x

WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION (sued herein as "GATES CORPORATION") hereby

request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant THE GATES CORPORATION with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant THE

GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Dennis Vega, EsqDavid A. ChaR4terrisq,—Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

Attorneyfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor The Gates Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center - 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

I9454237vi

03/25/2015 14:56 FAX HOOll/OOlgÿt


IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

DONNA MCCOLGAN, as Executrix for the Estate ofJAMES T. MCCOLGAN, and DONNA MCCOLGAN,Individually

Plaintiff,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. andRESEARCH-COTTRELL, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Index No.: 190125/2013

October 2014 In Extremis ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant RESEARCH-COTTRELL, INC.,n/k/aAWTAir Company, Inc.,hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant RESEARCH-COTTRELL, INC.with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant RESEARCH-COTTRELL, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, NewJfork

BenjaminiJarche, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

¥\ÿSiWilliam T. Miedel, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneys for Research-CottreU. Iqc.1085 Raymond BoulevardOne Newark Center, 16th FlcrorNewark, NJ 07102

VLE

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton,J.S.C.

'/S

JUL"YCNEW

JUhl 252015HYs

Soc°URr .


xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALHon. Peter H. Moulton

x

MARY KELLY, as Administratrix for the Estate of RALPHKELLY, and MARY KELLY,

Index No.: 190130/2013

Plaintiffs,NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA (ALCOA),et al., including GATES CORPORATION,

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION (sued herein as "GATES CORPORATION") hereby

request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant THE GATES CORPORATION with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant THE

GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


Charles Ferguson, Esq—-Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

Dennis Vega, EsqSedgwick LLP

juMn(i>,-2.o*s

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneyfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Dennis Vega, Esq. ÿ

Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor The Gates Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center - 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102 COUNTY CLERKSOFF1CE

filedJUL 0 7 2015



xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

ROBERT T. GLASER,

Plaintiff (s) ,-against-

NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,

Defendants ,

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, 35* )

Index No.: 14/19006092/1453791/16743

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-x

WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL

GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC

d/b/a NATIONAL GRID and LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint

against defendant NATIONAL GRID with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and

cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York(oil* 2015

John J. FanrCullen and IwkmanAttorney fmÿDefe idantNATIONAL GRID GEltf 3RATION LLC44 Wall StNew York, \IY-ÿr0005(212) 732-2000

it)ti tr(M3urshtynPactWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

ML 61c«KSOFOCE


m ©

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

X NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONI.A.S. Part(Judge Moulton)

This Document Relates to:JESS G. NEGRETE,

XIndex No.: 190074/2014

Plaintiff , SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

against

GOULDS PUMPS, INC., et al .,

Defendants .X

WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2015

Attorneys for PlaintiffJess G. Negrete700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Kristen L. Morrisgy/, EsqCULLEN and DYKMAN TjLP

Attorneys for DefendantGOULDS PUMPS, INC. -44 Wall Street, 15t'K:'lj>cNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000 JUFile No. : 6754-12674

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEC

NEW YORK

So Ordered:eter H. Moulton, J.S.C

supreme

Supreme Court of the State of NewYorkCounty of NewYork

InRENEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:New York Asbestos

LEO REGINALD AKERS, Litigation (NYCAL)

Plaintiff IndexNo. 190150/10

- against -

AtTON PUMPS, iNC., Ex AL.NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

Defendants

WHEREFORE, defendant, International Truck and Engine Corporation, (now byoperation of name change only known as Navistar, Inc.) ("Navistar") hereby requests summaryjudgment inthe above-titled case, pursuant to CPLR §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaintagainst defendant, Navistar, along with all cross-claims against it,with prejudice, there being noopposition hereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, International Truck and Engine Corporation, (now by operation of name change onlyknown as Navistar, Inc.),be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice without costs.

Dated:

Locks Law Firm,PLLC Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC

Mfet C. Walsh, EsquireAttorneys for Plaintiff

\kuhJdJiL$(/lizaljieth A. Weill, Esquire

800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022

International Truck and EngineCorporation, (now by operation of Xchange only known as|5&vi$tait Inc§s»»50 S. 16th Street, 22nd iSfor®Two Liberty Place j\j\_ G "JPhiladelphia, PA 19102 r-avosC

Attorneys for Defendant,International Truck and E

qFFICE

SO ORDERED:

HON.PETERH.MOULTON J S C


BERNARD TANNENBAUM, Index No.: 190370/14

Plaintiff,

against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to TAPPAN andCOPES-VULCAN, et al.

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION

-XWHEREFORE, Defendant, ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,

Individually and as successor to Tappan and Copes-Vulcan (hereinafter

"ELECTROLUX") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant, ELECTROLUX, with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross

claims against defendant, ELECTROLUX, be and the same are hereby


Dated: /hite Plains,sfij ÿ

White jÿjains, New York2015

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh Messemer &Moroknek LLP .

Attorneys for DefendantELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to Tappayÿ IJand Copes-Vulcan < IV, W55 Church Street, Suite 211%" *White Plains, NY 10601 rt\\ §1 ÿ

Tel: 914-385-6000

So Ordered: J.S.C.

f \

co>J,iT{ieir(OP'K

,pfcffc** j.S.C.

I

*SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XJANE DISTEFANO and PHILLIP DISTEFANO, Index No.: 190364/14

Plaintiffs, SECONDNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION

against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to TAPPAN andCOPES-VULCAN, etal.

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, Defendant, ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,









Dated: White Plains, New YorkQ,ih , 2015/hite PlainxfSi.

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh Messemer &Moroknek LLPAttorneys for Defend;ELECTROLUX HOMIndividually and as si

and Copes-Vulcan55 Church Street, SuWhite Plains, NY 106Tel: 914-385-6000

So Ordered


X Index No. 190192/14DIANE MCLAUGHLIN, as Executrix for the Estate ofKENNETH MCLAUGHLIN, JR. and DIANEMCLAUGHLIN, individually,

- against -

Plaintiffs,SECONDNO OPPISITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION

AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC.,ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as Successor to Tappan andCopes-Vulcan, et al.,

Defendants.X










Dated: White Plains, New York 'vN? yQ , 2015 QA_

Phan Alvarado, Esq.Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

in Alvarado CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh & Messemer LLPAttorneys for DefendantELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to Tappanand Copes-Vulcan55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000

So Orderei


WILLIAM D. EBANKS,

- against -Plaintiff,

Index No. 190040/15

SECONDNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and as Successorto Sarco Company, et al.,

Defendants.=X

WHEREFORE, Defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and as

successor to Sarco Company (hereinafter "SPIRAX SARCO") hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant,

SPIRAX SARCO, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.


claims against defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, be and the same are hereby


Dated: Whitq Plains, New York(f 7m ,2015

./

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

L°A./

CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh & Messemer LLPAttorneys for DefendantSPIRAX SARCO, INC.55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000

So Ordered: J.S.C.

HON. PETESHIUOULTONJ.S.C.

W/;COUNÿÿOWÿ.EÿS,

1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK==========================================XJAMES WIDERMAN and MARY WIDERMAN,His wife, Index No. 190392-14

Plaintiffs,- against - NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION

A.O. SMITH CORPORATION,SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and asSuccessor to Sarco Company, et al.,

Defendants.==========================================X


Successor to Sarco Company (hereinafter "SPIRAX SARCO") hereby







Dated: White Plains, New YorkOAS , 2015

"y

DAVID CHANDLER, ESQ.Karst & von Oiste, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs576 5th Avenue, Suite 401New York, New York 10036(212) 764-3900

CYNTHIA"K. MESSEMER, ESQHodges Walsh & Messemer, LLPAttorneys for DefendantSPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individi&lyf nSuccessor to Sarco Company *55 Church Street, Suite 211 )\j\_

D81 59®

White Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000

QpF'CE

So Ordered J.S.C.

HON.PEIBM;.MGUEM3H7/6/ IS


ÿX NYCALI.A.S. Parÿfpfciilei', ,INRE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No. 01-113335

ÿX

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT

MOTIONAND ORDERJOSEPH C. McKENDRY

ÿX

WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley

Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant

Patterson-Kelley Divisionwith prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

6> I( £

Frank-Ortiz, Esq

__y_

SamhSPGoldblatt, EsofBenjamin R. DwyerEsq.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. NIXON PEABODY LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorneys for Defendant,Patterson-Kelley CompanyKey Towers at Fountain Plaza40 Fountain Plaza, Suite 500Buffalo,NY 14202(716) 853-8100

tiO

SO ORDERED,Jon. Peter H.Moulton

4821-0003-1523 1



NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190263/14

JEREMIAH P. SULLIVAN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer,

Inc. ("Eaton"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Eaton with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant Eatonbe and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


Benjamin D$cne,Esq.

,2015

ÿ/Gabriel G. ferstendig, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, PC700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

McELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY& CARPENTER, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Eaton Corporation,

2571852

// -- i~l(don. Peter H. Moulton





EUGENE SOWA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer,


Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Eaton

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is



Qÿbriel G. Ferstendig, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney &

Erik Jacobs, Esq. (

Weitz & Luxenberg, P1O- McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Eaton Corporation, as

10003 successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED,He Hilton, J.S.C.

2292386





WILLIAM T. CRUGER and ALEXISCRUGER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer,


Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Eaton with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto.




6\ ,2015

J3tibriel G. FerSfendig, Esq.Attorneys for Eaton Corporation, asinterest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc.

Frank Ortiz, EsqTAWeitz & Luxenberg, PC700 Broadway

Attorneys for Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

New York, New York 10003

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H.Moulton

oc \\&r ,, v*

2681081

1

-X


IN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

VINCENT S. ROSSI and LINDA ROSSI,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

ABB, INC.as successor in interest to ITE CIRCUIT BREAKERS, INC,et al.,

NYCALI.A.S. Part(HeitWj I)

Index No. 190411/2014


Defendants.-X

WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant PFIZER INC. only with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant PFIZER INC. only be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

c°sts. s/if/aoir

CarrrTCTf St. George fjWEITZ & luxenberg;P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Telephone: (212) 558-5580Facsimile: (212) 344-5461Attorneys for PlaintiffsVincent and Linda Rossi

Nicole A. SpenceRENZULLILAW FIRM,LLP81 Main Street, Suite 508White Plains,NY 10601Telephone: (914) 285-0700Facsimile: (914)285-1213Attorneys for DefendantPfizer Inc.

« ««»»

rEcÿsf

SO ORDERED

l.PETER

-X NYCAL ÿI.A.S.PartÿcT ÿ

-X <IIullu,J.) -Index No. 190265/2013



IN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

WILLIAM D. WHITSON and ROSE WHITSON,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„

Defendants.

X

WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant PFIZER, INC. only with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant PFIZER, INC. only be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Ambre BrandisWEITZ AuJXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Telephone: (212) 558-5580Facsimile: (212) 344-5461Attorneys for PlaintiffsWilliam and Rose Whitson

GutU- 12,J0|6

_ —ÿ_Nicole A. SÿenceRENZULLILAW FIRM,LLP81 Main Street, Suite 508White Plains, NY 10601Telephone: (914) 285-0700Facsimile: (914)285-1213Attorneys for DefendantPfizer, Inc.

sslsiW®•weL0«SOFnC6

SO ORDERED tA//HON. PETER H. MOULTON

J.S.C.

JUN 1 7 2015

—5

t


INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-X

-XThis Document Relates To:

SUSAN K.HAZARD, Individually and as Executrixof the Estate of WALTER ROBINSON HAZARD,deceased,

Plaintiffs,

INDEX NO.: 190377/2014


vs.

SELBY, BATTERSBY & CO., INC.,et al.,

Defendants.-X

WHEREFORE, Defendant, SB DECKING, INC. f/k/a Selby, Battersby & Company,

hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant, SB DECKING, INC.

f/k/a Selby, Battersby & Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, SB DECKING, INC. f/k/a Selby, Battersby & Company, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice without costs.

Dated: New York,N-tU

Buffalo,New

'1.1l\>

Jordan C. Fox,,BELLUCK I&/FCTX, LLPAttorneys foyPlaintiff546 FifthAvenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036(212) 681-1575

SO ORDERED,Horkÿeter H. Moulton

-'fajjfcUk/i [ÿ!Ikuuf \

Rachel A. Emminger, Esq.FELDMAN KIEFFER, LLPAttorneysfor Defendant SB Decking, Inc.f/k/a Selby, Battersby & Co.110 Pearl Street, 4th FloorBuffalo,New York 1420£

"""""*I'S


xIn Re: Asbestos Litigation

xThis Document Applies To: Index No. :

190209-14JAY A. GAYOSO and SHARON GAYOSO

Plaintiff (s) , STIPULATION OFDISCONTINUANCEAS AGAINSTFORD MOTOR COMPANYONLY

-vs-

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. (AHM)et .al . ,

Defendants .x

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between theundersigned, that whereas no party hereto is an infant,incompetent person for whom a committee has been appointed orconservatee and no person not a party has an interest in thesubject matter of the action, the above entitled action be, andthe same hereby is discontinued, as against FORD MOTOR COMPANY,with prejudice and without costs to either party as against theother. This stipulation may be filed without further noticewith the Clerk of the Court.

Dated: New York, New YorkJune 08, 2015

Nancy Pÿfnnie, EsqAttorneys for Defendants

FORD MOTOR COMPANYAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &

DEUTSCH, LLP600 Third Avenue, 5th FloorNew York , NY 10005

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for plaintiff (s)700 BroadwayNew York, New Y

07 70®,-TY CLERKS OFFICE

C°ÿ»

SOHÿucrett:


ROBERT BRUCE BURAWA and DEBORAH ANNBURAWA,

Index No. 190272/2012

Plaintiffs, STIPULATIONDISCONTINUING ACTION

WITH PREJUDICE-against-

ACKER DRILL COMPANY, et al.

Defendants.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, the

attorneys of record for the plaintiff and defendant named below in the above entitled action, that

whereas no party hereto is an infant, incompetent person for whom a committee has been

appointed or conservatee and no person not a party has an interest in the subject matter of the

action, the above entitled action be, and the same hereby is discontinued, in accordance with the

terms of the accompanying release, with prejudice as to FORD MOTOR COMPANY without

costs to any party as against the other. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with

the Clerk of the Court.


BELITtriÿ & pnv it p AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN&DEUTSCH, LLP

Joseph W. Beiluck, Esq.Attorneysfor Plaintiff546 FifthAvenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036

N ehnie, Esq.Ai )r Defendant6( WenueNew York, NY 10016

le, Esc

<so otipgib: x' tqhHON,Pÿtenrv",",~


RENA N. BAILEN, Individually and as Executrix tothe Estate of EDDIE HOWARD BAILEN,deceased,

Index No. 190318/2012

Plaintiffs, STIPULATIONDISCONTINUING ACTION

WITH PREJUDICE-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, asSuccessor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.,et al.

Defendants.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, the

attorneys of record for the plaintiff and defendant named below in the above entitled action, that

whereas no party hereto is an infant, incompetent person for whom a committee has been

appointed or conservatee and no person not a party has an interest in the subject matter of the

action, the above entitled action be, and the same hereby is discontinued, in accordance with the

terms of the accompanying release, with prejudice as to FORD MOTOR COMPANY without

costs to any party as against the other. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with

the Clerk of the Court.


BELLUCK & FOX,LLP AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN&DEUTSCH,LLP

Joseph Wf%elluck, Esq. NarfcAttorneysfor Plaintiff Attoi546 FifthAvenue, 4th Floor 600 '

New York, New York 10036 New York, NY 10016 U\U ÿ (

(jt) dfcQEKifpjSST 'f 1


x

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,'!-.)

-x

GLADYS RICHMOND, as Executrix for the Estate of Index No. 100309/07MURRAY L. WHITE, and GLADYS RICHMOND, asExecutrix for the Estate of EMMA C. WHITE,

Plaintiffs,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et ah,including, MORSE DIESEL, INC.

Defendants,

-x

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment inthe

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


JJK& 3ÿ2015

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsGladys Richmond, as Executrixfor the Estate ofMurray L. White, and Gladys Richmond, asExecutrixfor the Estate ofEmma C. White700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285 1

jfcBVCSpÿ

SO ORDERED, ,Hon. Peter H.Moulton

Dated:G Si

INRE


GERARD E. SCHIAVO,

NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-x

•x

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,ÿ£.)

Index No. 112522/06

Plaintiff,

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et al„including, MORSE DIESEL, INC.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants,

-x

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc.,hereby requests summary judgment inthe

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York—Tulÿe ÿ>2015

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffGerardE. Schiavo700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285

jvj\_ 61 2015

SO ORDERED,HOxx. x XX. x.xxxxxxxxxxx


IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

THOMAS H.DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

NYCAL

Index No: 190525/2012


-against-

3M CO. (f/k/a Minnesota Mining& Manufacturing Co.) et al.,includingABB, INC.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant ABB, Inc. (sued as "ABB, Inc., (as successor to ITE Imperial Co.,

f/k/a ITECircuit Breaker Co.) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant ABB, Inc.

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


ABB, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: N&w York, New York

.2.9—. 2015

/jqsephN.

__/.Ianier lawfirm,pllc

126 East 56"' St., 6'" FloorNew York, NY 10022Attorneysfor PlaintiffThomas H. Davis(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, .Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Matthew E. Endlich, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor DefendantABB, Inc.(212) 791-0285

DATED: 1MIT

p \ l»07—-gssr*

INRE



NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

x

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

Index No. 19004'.„

STUART L. MCMAHON and CAMILLE MCMAHON NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Reynolds Metals Company, hereby requests summary

judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant Reynolds Metals Company, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto, it is


defendant, Reynolds Metals Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York/ New York

-x

2015

Michael J. Curtis, Esq.Patti Burshtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,PC700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)(212) 558-5500

MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor Defendant(212) 791-0285 It 07

Y CL-EBKSN&w VOBY

SO ORDERED, Dated:ffon. Peter H. Moulton



STUART L.MCMAHON and CAMILLE MCMAHON,

Plaintiffs,

-v.-

NYCAL

Index No. 190047/2015


A.O. SMTH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL„ including,CROWN BOILER CO.

Defendants.

-x

WHEREFORE, defendant CROWN BOILER CO., F/K/A CROWN INDUSTRIES, INC.

("Crown Boiler") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Crown

Boiler with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant Crown Boiler be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York,/New York

1 ) 2015

Patti Burhtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneysfor PlaintiffsStuart McMahon, et al.(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor DefendantCrown Boiler Co.(212) 791-0285 file

JUL o ÿ

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Hon. Peter H. MoultonDated: jjpj/t>



STUART L. MCMAHON and CAMILLE MCMAHON,

Plaintiffs,

-v.-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL„ including,SUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC.,

Defendants.

NYCAL

Index No. 190047/2015


WHEREFORE, defendant SUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC. ("Superior") hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Superior with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,


Superior be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New YorkJNew York1h ,2015

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,PC700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneysfor PlaintiffStuart McMahon, et al.(212) 558-5500

Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor DefendantSuperior Boiler Works, Inc.(212) 791-0285

SO ORDERED Dated:lion. Shcny Klein Ilcitli*--"ON-PErERH.MOULTQN

y/lfjts

F \ V-jULdt 10,5

-X

Index No.: 190464/12

SECONDNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION


NANCY DURGIN, as Executrix for the Estate ofEDWARD DURGIN and NANCY DURGIN, Individually,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK, INC.,ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to TAPPAN andCOPES-VULCAN, et al„

Defendants.





plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant, ELECTROLUX, with prejudice, and there





Dated: White Plains, New York,2015

BarUsLP. DlouinrfeWeitz & LuxenbergÿAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

So Ordered

ÿV-H O CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh Messemer &Moroknek LLPAttorneys for DefendantELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INjIndividually and as successoUo«ra%parand Copes-Vulcan r Iÿ55 Church Street, Suite 211 q"]Whito Plainc NY-infim 3ÿ rr,rcWhite Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000

J.S.C.

WON.PETERH.MOULTON

VS


XDON P. DONOVAN and KATHLEEN DONOVAN, Index No. 190046/2015

Plaintiffs,- against -

ABB, INC.,SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and as successorto Sarco Company, et al.,


Defendants.X




Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant,





Dated: White Plains, New York, 2015

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh & Messemer LLPAttorneys for Defendant

So Ordered:,>N.PETERH.MOULTON

ÿ4

SPIRAX SARCO, INC.55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601 1Tel: 914-385-6000 '

supreme

S Qr'RCt


WILLIAM D. EBANKS,

- against -Plaintiff,

=X Index No. 190040/15


A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and as Successorto Sarco Company, et al.,

Defendants.=X









Dated: White Plains, New York, 2015

Parti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

CYNTHIA-K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh & Messemer LLPAttorneys for DefendantSPIRAX SARCO, INC.55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601 ÿ JTel: 914-385-6000

So Ordered

JVJV. 07 20ft

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

_J.S.C. fjlpjlÿ covjtfÿ CORK'S OFFICEyobb

©

Documents

Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · AMERICAN OVERSEAS MARINECORP, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, by itssuccessor-in-interest, ... 2004) hereby requests summary …