102
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, ... NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION.f ... and

  • Upload
    dinhnga

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

NYCAL

LA.S. PART 50

(Moulton, p>

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

----------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-------------------------------------- )(

Marilyn Kesar, as Administratrix for the Estateof Robert V. Kesar and Marilyn Kesar,individually,

INDE)( NO. 190020-15

(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.lOctober 2015In Extremis Trial Cluster)

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. Smith Water Products Co., et aI.,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.

Defendants.-------------------------------------- )(

WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto;

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York F I L ~ 0September5R.-, 2015 I;;

OCT ;;'. /1 I PO~~ 'eer -- 302015 ~~.

Patti Burshtyn,~. COUN Richard P. O'Leary, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 7Y CLERK'S Troutman Sanders LLP700 Broadway NEW YORK OFF1CE?375 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10174-0700212-558-5500 212-704-6000Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for DefendantThe Estate ofRobert V Kesar, dec'd Standard Motor Products, Inc.

SO ORDERED, ---7"'''---~~ ----lI'-=-l0IIJ rS7~rH. Moulton

Active 26605182v 1 999900.952301

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------)(PHYLLIS HAUCK, Index No. 190246/12

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYPlaintiff, JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER-against-

ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC., at at.,including ARVINMERITOR, INC.,

Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------)(

WHEREFORE, defendant Arvinmeritor, Inc., successor-in-interest to the former

automotive products segment of Rockwell International Corporation ("Arvinmeritor"), hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Arvinmeritor with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crosS-CI~against

defendant ArvinmeritOl' be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and Wit't"(:sts.Dated: Ncw York, New York DC/ i?'A~ C0u. 36 V

-c ~"~--------.. ~~~t:J~»:~~Michael Co an, Esq. Jordan D, . eltz, Esq, ~-r- ~~

NAPOLI, BERN, RIPKA, SHI<OLNIK & KASOWI. , BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN,£t,P

ASSOCIATES, LLP Attorna'ys for Defendant Arvinmeritor, Inc.Attorneys for Plaintiff 1633 Broadway350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7413 New York New York 10019,New York, NY 10018

SO ORDERED,

~"'===-I-Ion. P&erH. Moulton ~30//S

I

SUPREME COURT OF TIlE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION.f.......

-------------------------------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To: .;:

HENRY R. BETTKE and LOLA BETTKE,

:::'

--------------------------------------------------------------x

NYCALlA.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No.: 190260-15

NO OPPOSITIONSU~ARYJUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tecumseh Power Company hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Tecumseh Power Company, with prejudice, there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Tecumseh Power Company, be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Od-uiJA.! , 2 ~ ,2015New York, New York

Mark D. Debrowksi, Esq.HA~NSPARNELLTHACKSTON

&YOUNGLLPAttorneys jar DefendantTecumseh Power Compan~600 Lexington Avenue, 81 FloorNew York, New York 10022-7678(212) 897-9655

SO ORDERED,

11181445v.2

7.~ . ~SHon. Peter H. Moulton

F I LEDOCT 302015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------){IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton)

This Document Relates To:

HENRY R BETTKE and LOLA BETTKE,

• Index No.: 190260-15

"( NO OPPOSITION:' SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Platinum Equity LLC, Individually and as Successor in

interest to Tecumseh Power Company (hereinafter "Platinum Equity"), hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Platinum Equity, with prejudice, there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Platinum Equity, be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: . Oc ~17 (C ..• ,. L~, 2015New York, New York

Patti B·urshtyn, Esq. ,, .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintifJ~

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

1="11.. 12, (I OCr l)

P(.,zJ~tvrr 302015

Mark D. Debrowski, Esq. tv Cl..E:FjHAWKINS PARNELL TIIACK§"~~SO~~/C

& YOUNG LLP ~ 'E:Attorneys for Defendant, Platinum Equity LLC,Individually and as Successor in interest toTecumseh Power Compan~600 Lexington Avenue, 81 FloorNew York, New York 10022-7678(2J 2) 897-9655

SO ORDERED'~---i~~~~=-----_ -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-__-LJ/~U/fO/JSIt:~e~. Moulton

III 81447v.2

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

---------------------------------------------------------------)(WILLIAM WEIGOLD, Index No. 121090/02

113276/02Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorklOIO?:> [I~'

By:

WEITZ & LU)(ENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany and Goodyear Canada Inc.

,q~

s1 LED264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018 OCT 302015(212) 302-2400

COUNryCLERK'

NEW YOR~OFFICE:

SO ORDERED: « _tU/JO/IS<Hon. Peter H. Moulton, lS.C.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------J(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION---------------------------------------------------------------J(LINDA A. COOPER and JOHN E. BURNS SR., as: Index No. 116167/04Co-Executors for the Estate of OWEN F. BURNS 34778/92JR.,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.---------------------------------------------------------------J(

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 5(/)

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York\OJ03)')

WEITZ & LUJ(ENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

By: -f------,~=====-----=~_e_--- ... LED

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

OCT 30 Z015

SO ORDERED: L2: ~ujJrlSZHon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------------xBARBARA CONNOLLY, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE OF THE HEIRS AND ESTATE OFROBERT L. SIMMS, DECEASED, Index No.: 190386-11

Plaintiffs,

-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.-------------------------------------------------------------------x

WHEREFORE, Defendant, F!v1C Corporation on behalf of its former Peerless Pump

and Chicago Pump businesses, and FMC Corporation on behalf of its former subsidiary, Crosby

Valve, Inc., improperly sued as FMC Corporation on behalf of its former Peerless Pump

Division and Chicago Pump Division and Crosby Valves (hereinafter "FMC"), hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiff s complaint against Defendant FMC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED. that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Chri~t~ph~~'''ti'~~£PU~JYCLERk'smOFFICEKELLEY JASONS MCGd'WWl\YORKSPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLP120 Wall Street 30lh FloorNew York, New York 10005Attorneys for Defendant Ftv1C Corporation

oOCT 301015

SO ORDERED, ~Mo;:;It;;'n~---

Defendant FMC be, and the same are hereby, dismissed \\1ith prejudice anFit,mtstE

Dated: New York, New York

L0/J-3 ,2015__-.n -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.t~.-•.-.~.--

~ ------CD~~. _m.mm__m )

KARST &:'VON OISTE, LLP576 Fifth Avenue, Suite 706New York, New York 10036Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------------xJOSEPH ROBINSON AND PAMELA ROBINSON.HIS WIFE,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et aL,

Index No.: 190307-11

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

.·.·.-.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.'.·.wm _ .

Christopher Hannan, ES'hOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEKELLEY JASONS MCG'awA1'f..1EW YORKSPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLP120 Wall Street, 30th FloorNew York, New York 10005Attorneys for Defendant FMC Corporation

OCT 302015

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, Defendant, FMC Corporation on behalf of its former Peerless Pump

and Chicago Pump businesses, and FMC Corporation on behalf of its former subsidiary, Crosby

Valve, Inc., improperly sued as FMC Corporation on behalf of its fonner Peerless Pump

Division and Chicago PLilllP Division and Crosby Valves (hereinafter "FMC"), hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant FMC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant FMC be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costl EDated: New York, New York F ,

-.i<?/.2i) 2015

D~~KARST & VON OISTE, LLV576 Fifth Avenue, Suite 706New York, New York 10036Attorneys for Plaintiffs

o

SO ORDERED~=er=H=.=),=10=u=lt=o::n==-ooc;~lojJofS('i {\ "-c-I' i (... :,,-, i '-

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------------xHELEN T. GORMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASPERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE HEIRS ANDESTATE OF THOMAS P. GORMAN. DECEASED,..

Index No.: 190116-11PlaintifIs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, et aI.,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, Defendant, FMC Corporation on behalf of its former Peerless Pump

and Chicago Pump businesses. improperly sued as FMC Corporation, on behalf of its former

Peerless Pump Division and Chicago Pump Division and Crosby Valves (hereinafter "FMC"),

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant FMC with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against 0Defendant FMC be, and the same are hereby. dismissed with prejudice andErthlt Ls.E

Datcd: Ncw York, New YorkLL _...2::~. 20 15

David Chandler:KARST & VON OISTE, LLP576 Fifth Avenue, Suite 706New York, New York 10036Attorneys for Plaintiffs

oel S'() 20\5

~CLERK'S OFFICE

Ci~~:T~t~;pl~;;:H~;~~~n, Esq. NEWYORK

KELLEY JASONS MCGO'Al ANSPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLP120 Wall Street, 30th FloorNew Yark, New York 10005Attorneys for Dcfendant FMC Corporation

SO ORDERED,.a-- - ----~poj)S-4·1on. Peter H. Moulton

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

DEANNA L. SADOWSKI AS EXECUTRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF RICHARD ZINGARO ANDMARY ZINGARO, INDIVIDUALLY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

-----------------j (Moulton, fJIndex No: 128019102

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

OCT 302015

Dated: New York, New YorkCK~~b,r > ,2015

. ~U~ \ Wrl\-t.WEITZ & LV BERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

F I LED

(\ L/\COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Judith A. Yavitz, q.DARGER ERRA E YAVITZ & BLAV, LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 1ih FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

DEANNA L. SADOWSKI AS EXECUTRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF RICHARD ZINGARO ANDMARY ZINGARO, INDIVIDUALLY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

----------------------i (Moulton, 1.)

Index No: 128019/02

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York()C~~f 3 ,2015

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

f\ LEOoe\ 3\~'l.G'5

Judith A. Ya . z, Esq.DARGER TE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorney or CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 1ih FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~~~==::::::=::~~uj]OJ1-.5ji6"n. Peter H. Moulton -=!:.:.j' I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DEANNA L. SADOWSKI AS EXECUTRIX FOR

THE ESTATE OF RICHARD ZINGARO ANDMARY ZINGARO, INDIVIDUALLY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, 'f>Index No: 128019/02

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation

("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorka(\·"Ob~ r 3 , 2015

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yav' z, sq.DARGER TE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys, or Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 1i h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~ - !u J3uj1S/Hon. Peter H. Moulton I

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ELISE YARCZOWER, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF ARNOLD YARCZOWER, ANDELISE YARCZOWER INDIVIDUALLY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

---------------------i (Moulton, f.)Index No: 122138/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkaC~\)~r",\ ,2015

l4:a~~~~q. '"3u <~\."'\ \)..J~ •"'­WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, EsDARGER ERRAN YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 1ih FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~~~ I{)J30/ISfin. Peter H. Moulton / I '

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ELISE YARCZOWER, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF ARNOLD YARCZOWER, ANDELISE YARCZOWER, INDIvIDUALLY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, p.)Index No: 122138/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation

("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant

Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New York()C)1.)~u S ,2015

sq. "':) u..7 "''\ We ,}--WEITZ & L NBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

F I LEDOCT 302015

Judith A. Yavitz, EsDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~ -- /{)/1J~S~H.Moulton -~. 7'

This Document Relates to:

AMERICO A. VARI AND ADELAIDE F. VARI

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

------------------1 (Moulton, p>Index No: 110331103

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., nlk/a Rhone Poulenc Inc. ("Amchem

Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs. f\LEDDated: New York, New York

()t'"t>~!: r 'i, , 2015

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

oel 30 '2.0i5

ERK'S OFFICE

COU~f\K

Judith A. Yavitz, EsqYDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,/7/-__ f

"7"~"'------==------- Pj~ /-S"..flon. Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

This Document Relates to:

AMERICO A. VARI AND ADELAIDE F. VARI

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, f)Index No: 110331/03

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Dated: New York, New York~~\:)1'r 3 ,2015

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with pr!li&d

f \\.-without costs.

GCJ 'AO ?U\5

if'S Off\CE.T{ CLE.Rt'

COUN NE.'N '(aRK

. ~\A~." Wt 1M.WEITZ & LUX BERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, EsDARGER ERRANT YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~LZ...."e...-..-----=--=---=---=--=---=---10 boltstHon. Peter H. Moulton /..;. I'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

This Document Relates to:

AMERICO A. VARI AND ADELAIDE F. VARI

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, p.)Index No: 110331103

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation

("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New York()t~~'r "1 ,2015

J'u ';)'h", v,J,.,,­WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

F I LEDOCT 302015

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE AVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,/7~- lJ

-r-/_-~------=-rtJ/~oJISI4Oll:PeteiH. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

AMERICO A. VARI AND ADELAIDE F. VARI

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)Index No: 110331/03

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Oc..'m\)('r ?:> ,2015

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

FILEDOCT 302015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

WJudith A. Yavitz, Esq. 7DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~-----~~jifGn. Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

RICHARD E. MORRIS

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

-------------------j (Moulton, P)Index No: 112359/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Judith A. Ya . ,DARGER ERRAN YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York10 1011 ,2015

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and£hl'

costs. f \ LOe\ 3Q20\S

SO ORDERED, _."e;-~-H---- ~/')/17~~lton /'-

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

RICHARD E. MORRIS

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 112359/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation

("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant

Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkV)/01 J ,2015

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

F I LEDOCT 302015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Judith A. Yavit ,DARGER ERRANTE VAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,/"1--.----:-J-r---..

~/~/ ---'-.:::.I()IJiJ~S4Ion. Peter H. Moulton I'

RICHARD E. MORRIS

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

-------------------1 (Moulton, P.)

Index No:112359/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York__-'-"II........) I (y) I ,2015

FrM'lk Ortiz, "_}\t~ h '. \.1.):-;"WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

F \ LE 00(1 30 2015

TY CLERK'S OFFiCECOUN NEW YORK

Judith A. Yavitz, E .DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~PH""-~""nC-.p-e-t-er-H-.~==O=U-l-to=-n=-=-=-=--=-~;.-f-.-J-()/../..--S

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JAMES F. KINGSLEY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, P)

Index No: 190081/12

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkOcJ-()\),·~- :?~ ,2015

F' LED0[1 S'() 20\5

C' UNTY CLERK'S OFFiCE

l/EWYORK

Judith A. Yavitz, EsDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, /2':---""7:;:/j/],.:,/IS{ Hon. Peter H. Moulton I I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JAMES F. KINGSLEY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)Index No: 190081/12

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

{)(~·\vd" 1 , 2015

W:a~+ff~~~-.:s u)"'1\ We Ih..WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, EsDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ROBERT J. DUFFY AND FRANCES DUFFY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 119234/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation

("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New York_______, 2015

,~­~~.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

f\ LEOQel 3'\) 2U'S

ClcR\<:S Off\CE.NI'fNcW'(ORK

Judith A. Yav' ,DARGER E E YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

-----------------------1 (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 119234/01

ROBERT J. DUFFY and FRANCES DUFFY NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York\Q lo~ I 2015--------,

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

FI LE 0OCT 3'02015

Judith A. Yavitz, E .DARGER ERRANT YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY--------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION--------------------------------------xGAETANO BARTOLONE and MARIE BARTOLONE,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION,et al.,

Defendants.--------------------------------------x

I.A.S. Part 50(Justice Moulton)

Index No.: 190398/14

NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, GOULDS PUMPS, INC., requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing

Plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant, GOULDS PUFS I Ir' E'e osmissed

with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkOctober 2, 2015

Esq.Levy Konigsberg LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

SO ORDERED:

OCT 302015

l:~SCl

and Dykman LLPneys for Defendant

ds Pumps I Inc.44 Wall Streetl 15 th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000Our File No.: 6754-13445

ICE

L'l----_---Jf.~tJll0/As·Hon. 1feter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

X:DUN/60096.llegaf/NOSJM/fifo case

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------)(PAUL J. LANDOLFI and ELIZABETH LANDOLFI,

Plaintiff(s),

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

- against- Index No.: 190258/14

AMCHEM PRODUCTS, et al.; NYCALLA.S. Part 50

Defendants,

-----------------------------------~-----------------------------)(

WHEREFORE, defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL INC. f/kla Dunkirk Radiator

Corporation and as Successor by merger to The Utica Companies, Inc. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs! complaint against defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL INC. flkla Dunkirk

Radiator Corporation and as Successor by merger to The Utica Companies, Inc. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL INC. f/kla Dunkirk Radiator Corporation and as Successor

by merger to The Utica Companies, Inc., be and the same are hereby ~i1etthEjUOand

ut costs.

,Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

SO ORDERED/2-:...-------I"''J/*=3-J/+-j,--=:)- --I \'i \Han. Peter Moulton I !' \

I\

I'\

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50

______________~i (Moulton, p,)This Document Relates to:

GLENN GERMAINEAND

MORAG GERMAINE

! Index No.: 190032115,,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY, JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Dravo Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintitfs'

complaint against defendant, Dravo Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Dravo Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

J::-,l.0['1

312'()

COu/\; 020/5lye/\;/2;/2f1l(s

_~~~~~~~~_YO-.:.'f1.~f(LO_'f:;....:..f:;!.C1.'12'Ken n· oak, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDravo CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P .C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York Ip004·-~ .....(212) 509-3456 ! ..-'''~-''

IjIfI.

SO ORDERED,a --­Han. Peter H. Moulton

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Glenn Germaine and Morag GermaineSIMMONS HANLY CONROY, LLC

112 Madison AvenueNew York, New York 10016-7416(212) 784-6400

costs.

537-22

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : LA.S. Part 50________________~! (Moulton,1?)This Document Relates to:

GLENN GERMAINEAND

MORAG GERMAINE

!Index No.: 190032115,,

i NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Brand Insulations, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Brand Insulations, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Brand Insulations, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Glenn Germaine and Morag GennaincSIMMONS HANLY CONROY, LLC112 Madison AvenueNew York, New York 10016-7416(212) 784-6400

Ken . ook, Esq. O~

Attorney for DefendantBrand Insulations, Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, /J~7~erH. Moulton

I-·----"_·_~-""··_-~·----I I --0-, !r~~\

I L<::!)

I DCT :; 9 LJiSII "nf ~L

I ",i""-_..._'~-_.~< .._._-~---~~ ~ ~ ~

213-694

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50

~~__~~~__~~ ~! (Moulton, p.)This Document Relates to:

GLENN GERMAINEAND

MORAG GERMAINE

! Index No.: 190032/15,,,.,,

i NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Weir Valves & Controls, Individually, as successor to and

d/b/a Atwood & Morrill Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant, Weir Valves & Controls, Individually, as successor to and d/b/a Atwood & MOITill

Company, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Weir Valves & Controls, Individually, as successor to and d/b/a Atwood & Morrill

Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Kel . Cook, Esq.Attomey for DefendantAtwood & Monill CompanyMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attomey for Plaintiff(s)Glenn Germaine and Morag GermaineSIMMONS HANLY CONROY, LLC112 Madison AvenueNew York, New York 10016-7416(212) 784-6400

SO ORDERED, €crH. Moulton

963-2346

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

j Index No.: 190133/15,,,,,

! NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ROBERT CASTERELLA

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

:NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50: (Moulton, .f?)

---------------~

WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

against defendant, DAP, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, DAP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York_____,,2015

~ S Ij ---·--·····----6'" ~.D..A..~ .. Q~ ·1f"'0 t¥5':-_Carol Tempesta, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c. I:"-80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 r l INew York, New York 10004 ....(212) 509-3456

~~,oJshrS1mveJ {\1 ei~vJ ;\2.- r 7

Attorney for PlaintiffsRobert CasterellaMEIROWITZ & WASSERBERG, LLP845 Third Ave., 11 til Fl.N~w{ Ymk, New YOlk 10022(212) 897-1988-Zb?> D--c:P- JI>Ja.., , $ te- "Is-t>Nt-w '1Ui~1 ~"\ \cl.'1

SO ORDERED, d .....:----­7 Hon. Peter H. Moulton

604-833

C! ? (; I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, .p.>

--:--:-------:---------~

Index No.: 190115/15,ANGELO GUERRA

ANDANTOINETTE GUERRA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

SO ORDERED, _~,/2-~-======~~_~-==-tc)~~U;/~-~7Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Dated: New York, New York_____,,2015

Angelo Guerra and Antoinette GUCITil

MEIROWITZ & WASSERBERG, LLP845 Th.irrl Ave, 11th P:l. )...336r(JC(dwOty

-- Nevi YOlk, Nevi York 1Oez-2 tJV, U~ )(j:it7CJ(212) 897-1988

Zum IndListries, LLCMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.e.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212)509-3456 ;

I/j,

I

!I

"'~S::14H_!

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, f.')

---------------~

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190115115,

ANGELO GUERRAAND

ANTOINETTE GUERRA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

against defendant, DAP, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, DAP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York_____;, 2015

d -=--==- j@ jJoJ/'Sti --=:::::::::: I 1

/Hon. Peter H. Moulton

SO ORDERED,

A~ /dU-LIJ ~~~.9;./})I,e~ I I Carol Tempesta, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant 1:-,Angelo Guerra and Antoinette Guerra DAP, Inc. IMEIROWITZ & WASSERBERG, LLP MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. <-, J:::-,

-845 ThiTd Ave., 11th Ft. Z33 6roctJvJ~Y,)je1W80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 0Cl ' ()New Yefk, ~qew XI orR 10022 !J~GVY 1027'1 New York, New York ~04 :10;0(212) 897-1988 (212) 509-3456 U!I;/y 15

!I;~~~lyl('sYOIyI( Of::I'lC/2

604-834

--,'~) '.i; J

, :)

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

: NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, .f.)

---------------~

This Document Relates to:

JOSEPH P. HADDENAND

ELEANOR HADDEN

Index No.: 190386114,

, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York0e40 ber ~ ,2015

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

~/l..OC1

3~D

COUIv 0;0/5lyCI..Iv12W I2IYIfS

. ~IrO~I7C~Wf\IlAM/~. .AMaria J. Ciccia, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, _-;;1-'---~~ ~St'HLPeter H. Moulton

I,i,I

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALlAS. Part 50

(Moulton, £r---------------------;This Document Relates to:

Index No.: 190146/15,

GEORGE MORRISON AND ROSEANNE MORRISONNO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT

, MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Ductmate Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

III the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Ductmate Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant,

Ductmate Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Nit Y2~' ~w York) , 2015

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)George Morrison and Roseanne Morrison

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091

L u OCT 302015

~ElCECarol Tempesta,ES~=oR:Attorney for DefendantDuctmate Industries, Inc.

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.e.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, __~~'----__-_-_-_------------~---~oJ)57 Hon. Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL,

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : LA.S. Part 50________________~! (Moulton, ~This Document Relates to:

RICHARD J. PENESKIAND

MARY ANN PENESKI

! Index No.: 190552112,

,

!NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, be and the same are ~bY dismissed with prejudice

and without costs. I L E: 0Dated: New York, New York

Ck:tobl<:.f' ~ , 2015

AWL (2 M'~fD, €.)~ •Attorney for PlaintiffsRichard J. Peneski and Mary Ann PeneskiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

) _,J

OCT 302015

COUNTYCLF::RI('S

NEW 'fOR OFFIC£2

A.A~===:::::::=:::::.-Nicole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantAtwood & Morrill CompanyMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

aHon. Peter H. Moulton

SO ORDERED,

963-1390~ Ci\iTi

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

i Index No.: 190101115,

i NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY': JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ITALO A. POMPONIAND

EILEEN POMPONI

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

: NYCAL:, LA.S. Part 50: (Moulton, f)

----------------~

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment

In the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

Maria Ciccia, E .Attorney for De endantThe Fairbanks CompanyMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

// ------ 113</'s40n. Peter H. Moulton

Attorney for PlaintiffsHalo A. Pomponi and Eileen PomponiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew Yark, New Yark 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

ew York

------'--"'--1f--'-L-~t__' 2015

without costs.

504-1478

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50: (Moulton, f.)

----------------~

This Document Relates to:

ITALO A. POMPONIAND

EILEEN POMPONI

: Index No.: 1901 01/15,

~ NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 32 I2, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

prejudice and without costs.

defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, be and the same

Attorney for PlaintiffsHalo A. Pomponi and Eileen PomponiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,_~~ -,---ld+I-=-7<J1107 Hon. Peter H. Moulton

,'_. -' j .• J

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50

_______________~: (Moulton,.f?)This Document Relates to:

ITALO A. POMPONIAND

EILEEN POMPONI

: Index No.: 190101115,

: NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New ~ork, N~ York\t" ',1-:-1 ,2015~\

Attorney for PlaintiffsHalo A. Pomponi and Eileen PomponiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

5354419

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50: (Moulton,p>

----------------~

This Document Relates to:

ITALO A. POMPONIAND

EILEEN POMPONI

,

i Index No.: I901 01115,

i NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: New .Trk, N~ York\'C') 'd-,"J , 2015

Attorney for PlaintiffsHalo A. Pomponi and Eileen PomponiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, d-1H0n. Peter H. Moulton

963.2AJ~

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50: (Moulton, p)

----------------~

This Document Relates to:

SOL P. RASKINAND

MONA RASKIN

: Index No.: 190005115,

: NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment

III the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New \ ark, Nr~ Yark\~') .-a.-J ,2015

\

Attorney for PlaintiffsSol P. Raskin and Mona RaskinWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

~/(.

~I:()Maria Ciccia, Esq. 1v/2~/2f:tIr~Attorney for Defendant Y0,.<t, SO~The Fairbanks Company tr ~C'~MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, -----:r-d--==~::::::::-------~-----..----"".r__:/o/71ISdon. Peter H. Moulton

504"14,31

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190288/14In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

ARTHUR MCCARTHY,

- against-

AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et aI.,

Plaintiff(s),

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

SO ORDERED,

WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section- 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and c~s claims against

Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed~trfptud~and

without costs to either party. c: DOcr 3··

Dated: MQfCn ~"'~ ,2015 COUNty 02015

~New. York'.NeWYo.rk CL.£A

// N£V1; ~ ~/s Or:.

~~;" \.Ilc,It,,,,,, Katrt~~:I'~~, Esq. Of/I( "'ICt;

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGEAttorneys for Plaintiff SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.700 Broadway Attorneys for DefendantNew York, NY 10003 Aurora Pump Company(212) 558-5500 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

/~ :=::::::::::". _/d..?o J/s7.u:iherrYKkin IIeitler - ;-"/ /

RON. PB'fERH.MOVLTON

• r • [

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------------xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:

Darett Chantilope, as Administratrix for the Estate ofMargarito Chantilope, and Darett Chantilope, Individually

-----------------------------------------x

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, p)

Index No: 190083115

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CLYDE UNION, INC. hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against defendant CLYDE UNION, INC. with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CLYDE UNION, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

/o/2(J/SDated:

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

t: I L E: DVirginia Squitieri, Esq.o WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,

CT 302015 EDELMAN & DICKER LLPCo Attorney for Defendant

UNry CLE~R I CLYDE UNION, INC.N£W YO~S OFFIC~ 150 East 42

ndStreet

K New York, New York 10017212-490-3000File No. 07723.00153

SO ORDERED, _----::;~r-.~~---========~~~~-I()J)vjISHon. Peter H. Moulton I

6967643v.\

! ' "

"- ,-)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-------------------.x

-------------------x

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALLA.S. Part}if S""OfHeitlet, J.)

ARTHUR R. MCCARTHY and JANET MCCARTHY,

Plaintiffs,

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., including,MORSE DIESEL, INC.

Defendants,

-------------------x

Index No. 190288/14

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York() (ro\)cr ') ,2015

Ma~"~h'" W",,­WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneys for PlaintiffsArthur R. McCarthy and Janet McCarthy700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

F I LEDE;?--o-cno 2015

Rosario Chetta, Esq. CQ~CLERK'SOFFICEMALABY & BRADLEY, LLfiEWYORKAttorneys for DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285

so ORDEREDe ~ted:_---'-!-tbIL.:J:.......,0f-/:......:/S=-- _CMan. Sherry Klein Meitler - r I

HON. PE'rERH. MOULTON_

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190182115In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITlGATION

VINCENT COSTELLO,

P1aintiff(s),NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION

- against-

AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et ai.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

FI LEDOCT..3.0 2015

COU~~ME \ SOFFICE

Katrina~._hy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDEREQ IcJboJ/sHon. Peter H. Moulton / 7

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

en St. George,WEITZ & LUXE BERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------xWALTER HAZARD and SUSAN HAZARD,

Index No.: 190377114

Plaintiffs,-against-

A.W. CHESTERTON, et. al.

Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------x

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

l.A.S. Part~ 5'"'0 'Bon. SheIl y K. Hettlel

WHEREFORE, GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER DENVER")

hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant GARDNER

DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

OCT 302015

COUNTYCLERK'S OFF

~r------- NEW YORK ---~-e...fC-----~1

Dated:

Jordan ox,BELLUl-'!.....f~IVVAttorne or Plaintiff546 Fifth AvenueNew York, New York 10036(212)681-1575

SO ORDERED, ?H:. K' U-'-'-t1

-- ---OIl. ..,uerry . nt;lIer--

Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the satTle are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to . ither party. F I LED ~ .

RON. PETERH, MOULTON

....

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------xGAETANO BARTOLONE and MARIE BARTOLONE,

Index No.: 190398/14

Plaintiffs,-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEM CORPORATION, et. aI,Hon. Peter H. Mooulton

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------------x

WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DE:--JVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER

DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant

GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

-----. OCT 302015 f ~ v(;l

John uinan, Esq. ..)"''''''~> v.:;~~CL tNlsn S. L i i, Esq.L Y KONIGSBERG, LLP I f.n:W~RK'S OF e@AL Mc IXMBRIDGE SINGERAttorneys for Plaintiff ORK & MAHONEY, LTD.800 Third Avenue Attorneys for DefendantNew York, New York 10022 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100(212) 605-6200 New York, New York 10022

(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, .//.......---=:=========/i~()f-/Juj;sl(.I~t~~fCMoulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTQS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------xJOSEPH MAETKE, Index No.: 190373/14

Plaintiffs,-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER .

ABB, INC., et. al. LA.S. Part 50Han, Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.---------------------------------------------------------------------x

WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER

DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant

GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

F, LEDwithout costs to either party.

+rtl~~...."~~~~ M5~~::A:':O:FFwiC~~WEITZ & LUXENEBRG, PC •~W YORK ''s~GAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGERAttorneys for Plaintiff & MAHONEY, LTD.700 Broadway Attorneys for DefendantNew York, New York 10003 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100(212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10022

(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,. 0~ ~._...__.. /O/;>oJ!!~.-P-~~oulton

,j

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------~--------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(JEFFREY HOWER and NANCY HOWER, Index No.: 190132/15

- against-

ABB, INC., et a1.,

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITIONSl)MMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

LA.S. PartJO 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Dated: Oc.tt>~U ~ ,2015New York, New York

~fILEDWEITZ & LUXENBERG,(Jt<r:'3 02015Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York New Yor1«rW'b"§y CLERK'S OFFICE(212) 558-5500 NEW YORK

Defendants.------------------------------------------.._----------------------------)(

WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER

DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant

GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party.

Kevin W. Turbert, Esq.SEGAL McCAM"6RIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantGardner Denver, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, -----:"L.·L2~~.-..-----:::::::::::::::::=========--.!-~~~/C~OJIS7 Hon. Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(BRANKO SRICA and LJUBICA SRICA, Index No.: 190445/14

PlaintitlS,

- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY,JUDGMENT MOTION

l.A.S. Part 3ft' SOHon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER

DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice I.Jaw and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant

GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

without costs to either party.

Dated/olCf0 2015N~w York, New York

Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

~ll.----2 OCr30 I$'()/~.;.Vlvh_ 201$

/ ')'c',/ • "tv.~~,L~-2.~ ~/(I(~Kcvin W. Turbert, Esq. O/(I( O;::-f::jSEGAL McCAMBRIDGE IC~SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantGardner Denver, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, .A- ~=~=_J.'j7.J;S~'~~Pet~rH. Moulton

C ri tophe manelli, Esq.W ITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------xROBERT CASTERELLA,

Index No.: 190133/15

Plaintiff(s),-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

3M COMPANY, et al.

Hon. Peter H. MoultonDefendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------------x

WHEREFORE, Defendant L&M MFG., INC., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against Defendant L&M MFG., INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,

S el Meirowitz, E q.MEIROWITZ & W~ SERBERG, LLP seGAL c MBRIDGE SINGER &

L

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MAHONEY, LTD.845 Thitd ine., 11 th Floor Z:53 e(~~J.w<t'1' Sl€-1fn Attom~ys for Defenda.ntNew York, NY 1-OOZZ Nev-> "/0 {t, N'I \01,1\ 850 ThIrd Avenue, SUite 1100

NewYork,NewYork 10022

L&M MFG., INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either

party. J: II.. ~Dated: New York, New York OCr D

Co 302015I0 II~J 6lDI5 Utvty

tvE:C'-£RI('s/Itt YOAI( Of:f:/CI2

SOORDERED,_~LZ~.-71""-~-~--==-'::::-- /uJJO~5Hon. Peter H. Moulton ~7"

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK--------------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION--------------------------------------------------------------------xFREDERICK JOSEPH CICIO AND JACQUELINEA. CICIO,

Plaintiff(s),-against-

ALFA LAVAL INC., et al.

Defendants.-----------------------------------------------------------------------x

Index No.: 190207114

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint

against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,

BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissedFh rej[ce~ w[jut costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

Matthew P , sq.EARLY, LUCARELLI, SMEISENKOTHEN, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017

OCT 302015

John uerriero, Esq.SEGA McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

SO ORDERED, _--"'&2'----'-"'"'--__:~:::_-_-_-_-_-~-Hon. Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-------------------------------------------------------------- ---- --xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION--------------------------------------------------------------------xMARIE GRACE BEST as Executrix for the Estate ofJOSEPH BARRY BEST and MARIE GRACE BEST,

PJaintiff(s),-against-

ALFA LAVAL INC., et al.

Defendants.-------------------------------------------------------- ------ ---- ---- -x

Index No.: 190109/14

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

.tlon. £hen, Klein Ileitlei

WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries (incorrectly named

as "FLOWSERVE U.S. INC. Individually and as Successor to BYRON JACKSON PUMPS") hereby

requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., specifically as to the

product lines of Byron Jackson Pumps and Borg Warner Pumps, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,

BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs t0f!:erarty.

Dated: NewYo,k,NewYock - LEDtk~~(')\~u\S OCT 302015

~ lli~~ L/)/ , {L~~\JI.j ~OUNTyCI.~A~~OFF/Cf:~~ESC(' Nicole G. Markowitz,THE EARLY LAW FIRM SEGAL McCAMBRIDAttorneys for Plaintiffs MAHONEY, LTD.360 Lexington Ave., 20lh Floor Attorneys for DefendantNew York, NY 10017 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, New York 10022

So Drd~rtcl:a --==Io/:lfsHON. PErERH.MOULTON

SUPRElvlE COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NE\V YORK-- --------------- ------- --- ----------------- ---- -- ---------- -- ---------X

In Rc NEW YORK COUNTYASBES'I'OS LITIGATION

------- -------- ---------- ------- --- ----------------- ------- ------ ---- --XThis documcnt relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Partl!f' S- 0(Moulton, f?>

Index No.: 122203/99109280/00190298115

EDWARD T. PALMER and ELEANOR PALMER,

Plaintiffs,-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et a!.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY.JUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEEI,ERJDORR-OLIVERBOILER COMPANY

Defendant.-- ----- ------- --------- ------------ -- -------- ----- ------ ------- -------X

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLlVER BOILER COMPANY hcreby rcqucsts

MARIN GOODMAN, LIt>.Attol'llcysfol' Dcfclldallt )KEELER/DORR-OLIVE iOlLERCOMPANY500 l'vlamaroneck Ave, Suite 50 IHarrison, New York 10528(2 12) 661-115 I

summary judgmcnt in thc abovc-entitled casc, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plainlifTs' complaint against defendant KEELER/DOlm.-OLlVER BOILER COMPANY

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that lIpon notice to all co-dcfendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

KEELER/DORR-OLlVER BOILER COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: October20, 2015Harrison, NY

e .LUXENBERG, PC

AttoI'lleys fol' P/ailltUr F.,. L700 Broadway E 0New York, NY 10003 .(212) 558-5500

OCT 302015

COUN~~~~~~OFRCESO ORDERED:

/~H. Moulton, J.S.C.

A,SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION---------------------------------------------------------------)(CLIVE K. TAYLOR and CLARICE TAYLOR, Index No. 190113115

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50

---------------------------------------------------------------)(

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear 11'&.RubberCompan)j and Goodye anad Inc. .I l.

~",,-----,~_:~~~~-B-Y: OC~ J:DCarmen V. St. George, Esq. , Esq. C 30201':

Ol.JlVry .;

IVt:;f/;t:;!y1('8YO!y o;:::~

'f( Ct:;

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

SOORDERE~ Ic)h~__.l"Io~. Moulton, lS.C. 7

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------------xJOSE RIVERA AND CARMEN RIVERA, HIS WIFE,

Index No.: 190208-12Plaintiffs,

-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et aI.,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT~v10TION AND ORDER

Defendants.----------------------------------------------------------.--------x

WHEREFORE, Defendant, FMC Corporation on behalf of its former Peerless Pump

and Chicago Pump businesses, and FMC Corporation on behalf of its former subsidiary, Crosby

Valve. [nc., improperly sued as FMC Corporation on behalf ofits former Peerless Pump

Division and Chicago Pump Division and Crosby Valves (hereinafter "FMC"), hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant FMC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant FMC be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: ~:\V~o/~Z2~~;~ 1=1 LEDD~ ~ Oil 302015 Christopheriiaii;;iill,Es-q-.--

KARST & VON OISTE, £f)£jN7Y C KELLEY JASONS MCGOWAN576 Fifth Avenue, Suite 706 NE~ERKISOFF/ SPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLPNew York, New York 10036 YORK Cq20 Wall Street, 30th FloorAttorneys for Plaintiffs New York, New York 10005

Attorneys for Defendant FMC Corporation

l

.1

II eCT ;: [~i~- II

!

L,__ . -----.-----..--~(~.-.-_J

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARK RICCI

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, (?)

Index No: 190224/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated:

__-+-='-"--_, 2015

"~F I LED

opher A. Romanelli, Esq. Jonathan B. Kromberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Jl.ARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff COUNTY CLER~~KOFFI~ltorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Broadway NEW Y 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,.----?__--I..:::.,lo~l}()·Jls/~ 77'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

This Document Relates to:

JEFFREY HOWER and NANCY HOWER

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton,~)

Index No: 190132/2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Cooper Industries, LLC, incorrectly sued as Cooper Industries,

Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Cooper

Industries, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Cooper Industries, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Ckto'orr , ,2015

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

t:ILEOOCT 302015

CLERK'sNEW YORK OFFICE

B. Kromberg, Esq.DA· ER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Cooper Industries, LLC116 East 27th Street, 1i h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ItJ/JujI. ­~r~

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JEFFREY HOWER and NANCY HOWER

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)Index No: 190132/2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/kla Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a ~r Cropscience,

Inc. be and the sarne arc hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. I l.. t: 0Dated: New York, New York OCT

O<:l{)\Yr , , 2015 Co 302015UNry

tv CI.ERk'SEW YORk O~~/C~

G~~u.,,:, Ul,:h , E'l -J"--o-n-a--:7-.rn'-:-:-B-.--:-K-r-om---:-b-er-g-,-E-sq-.--------

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. D GER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 1i h FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, /L----~c...::~~)ibn. Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

This Document Relates to:

JEFFREY HOWER and NANCY HOWER

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

Index No: 190132/2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Ocl-o\)(f ,20151=1 LED

OCT 302015

,,~:,,' .,\ -J-o-n-at-h-a-n+-.-r-r-o-m-b-er-g-,-E-s-q.--------

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e. DAR ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, // --=:I4)n:PeterH. Moulton

This Document Relates to:

ERNEST A. DE CURTIS

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

-------------------j (Moulton,~)

Index No: 19025112015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

~---_~~o//~-Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Dated: New York, New York1011.- \ ,2015

~WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

qNJudith A. Yavit~: ~q.DARGERE~NTEYAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

JUDITH D. JEFFERSON AS EXECUTRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF BRUCE E. JEFFERSON ANDJUDITH D. JEFFERSON INDIVIDUALLY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

------------------j (Moulton, .9.)Index No: 190006/13

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE AVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

), ''"' ( .h..WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are Pbldtissed with prejudice and without

costs. . E 0Dated: New York, New York OCT 302015

QC':-()\a(r 3> ,2015 COUNTy CLE~R I

NE:W YO~~OFF=/C€

Ut/

SO ORDERED,~ Peter H. Moulton

!o}2(J);.S7 I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JUDITH D. JEFFERSON AS EXECUTRIX FOR

THE ESTATE OF BRUCE E. JEFFERSON AND

JUDITH D. JEFFERSON, INDIVIDUALLY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)Index No: 190006/1,13

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Oc. 'ttl\)rr 3. ,2015

. ~ "'~, "'" \Jj(.NWEITZ & L ERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY to038(212) 558-5500

F' lEDOCT 802015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Judith A. Yavitz, EsDARGER ERRA YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, --7"'-~~~::::::::::::=====~/J~j&*4fun. Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NORMA JASON, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF ROBERT JASON, AND NORMAJASON, INDIVIDUALLY

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

(Moulton, f.)

Index No: 190230112

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 1i h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. FI LEDDated: New York, New York OCT 30201'1:

QC)Pbt-f.3 ,2015 J

COUN/\/I T CLERK'NEW 'fOR~OFFIC€

SO ORDERED, ~-------.!r('!:!..,U/2!)l~/Hon. Peter H. Moulton

..

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, .f.jIndex No: 190230112

NORMA JASON, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF ROBERT JASON, AND NORMAJASON, INDIVIDUALLY

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Q(t1)b(r 3 ,2015

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016

(212) 452-5300 F, LEDOCT 302015

L?-----...1...&/J~GOUNTY CLERK'S 0ji6ii. Peter H. Moulton NEWYORK FFICE

SO ORDERED,

l;1.;aB*'~~~q. ~U)ll'" Wt'i 1"\,

WEITZ & LU ENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

This Document Relates to:

CHARLES BONA AND PATRICIA BONA

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part ?-.O

--------------------1 (Moulton, 1'6Index No: 190562/12

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New York()crui.>er.3 ,2015

mrnic'i:n"~.:b§lq. '3U) \...., \}J ( "h...WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavi Esq.DARGER E TE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys D chern Products, Inc.116 East 2i Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, /2-----~rs~Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY--------------------------------------XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION--------------------------------------xThis Document Relates to:NATALIE JURSON, as Executrix for theEstate of KARL JURSON, and NATALIEJURSON, Individually

FILEDOCT 30 2015

COUNTY

NE~~6~~OFFICE

Index No.: 108082/06

Plaintiff(s) ,

- against -

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Austin D. O'Malley,{sq.Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantMARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO.,INC.44 Wall StreetNew York, New York 10005212-732-2000Our File No.: 10~24~5312

-=-:&I3u/f~ I .':--'-":I!,:' -';'J-~. i

! Tk :Ji ',i I'I ,5 I

i :(--- ----~. .~J!",-, __. C'\i/, i

-..,..-. -....~ " 'L i

H~ H. Moulton,So Ordered:

", C".,"'<••••, ,.::>.~,;~.__ , Esq.

Weitz "&L~xenbe~, P. C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)NATALIE JURSON700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003212-558-5500

Defendants.--------------------------------------x

WHEREFORE, defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC.,.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against

defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING

CO., INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkOcrok~~_, 2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK----------------------------------------xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION----------------------------------------xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moul ton, P.)

JOSEPH C. MCKENDRY, Index No.: 01/113335

Plaintiff(s) ,

-against-

NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.----------------------------------------x

WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL

GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a

LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and

cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are

LED

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

cobs,WEITZ & LUXENAttorneys for700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

ithout costs.

----=-H6c:-7'4"'-.---..~e-t-e-r--::Hc::--.-::M-=-O-U--:l=-t,---o-n-----!-V/ ]V!ISSO ORDERED,

John J. FanninCullen and DykAttorney for DNATIONAL GRID G44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000

hereby

Dated: New York, New York_--,-q~tf) ,

X:DUN60S86.llegallNOSJMlaugust2015

SUP~ME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------)(ELISE YARCZOWER, as Administratrix for the Estate NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYOf ARNOLD YARCZOWER and ELISE YARCZOWER, JUDGMENT MOTION ANDIndividually, ORDER

Plaintiff(s),

- against-

A.C. & S. INC., et al.;

Defendants.-----------------------------------------------------------------)(

Index No.: 102724/02

NYCALLA.S. Part}6 S ()

WHEREFORE, defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL INC. f/k/a Dunkirk Radiator Corporation

and as Successor by merger to The Utica Companies, Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

against defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL INC. f/k/a Dunkirk Radiator Corporation and as Successor by

merger to The Utica Companies, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendants

ECR INTERNATIONAL INC. f/k/a Dunkirk Radiator Corporation and as Successor by merger to The

Utica Companies, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

_-E-lLE~-Justin Weitz, Esq. Michael Cromer, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffs 0[1 30 LGiS Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Weitz & Luxenberg Barry McTiernan & Moore700 Broadway RK"~ OFFICE 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor

nilli"NTV CLE ;;,New York, New York 1~ . NEW YORK New York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED, /2.., ~SMQR, Sbetry l(l@iFl: Heitlei'

HON. PETERH. MOULTON

'I

II

. il11

i'!,"

:1

II

II

X:IFBW39092IlegaVAPRlL20J6

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

'-----------------------------------------------------------------)(CONO AMILA MASCARELLA,

Plaintiff(s),

- against-

A.C. & S, Inc., et al.

Defendants.

-----------------------------------------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Index No.: 109071100

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

(J&&' UJ!J '!l., '"/ ~ !.J!&hik,

Chelsea Beshore, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

I

I

IIIII

,III[I

'I,III

~'II1FILED/'(fftJu (J [1 3Q2015

pIra.n Alvarado, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenb~UN TV CLERK'S OFFICE700 Broadway NEW YORKNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-550

SOORDE~ -----HJI30i/SHon. Peter Moulton ( -/ ':: /'

IL.

( ,

/ I

CLB56003/1egaVnosjm

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------J(PHILOMAE S. DONOVAN, Individually and asExecutrix ofthe Estate of JOHN J. DONOVAN,Deceased,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aI.,

Defendant(s),

-----------------------------------------------------------------J(

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Index No.: 109913/07

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

defendants C

ice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

S, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

Shawnette ,sq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

.,-~

, .)

SO ORDERED,~4Io:eterMOUlton

lo/JoJrs,. r 7

_.._-_._-\\

\\

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-.-----------------------------------------------------------XIN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION------------------------ ----- ----------------- -..,_."..-. -- -••-XThis Document Relates to:

ELISE YARCZOWER, as Proposed Executrixfor the Estate of ARNOLD YARCZOWER, andELISE YARCZOWER, Individually

NYCALLA.S, Part~ r; a(Moultan, p>

Index No: 102724/02NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

.--._--- --.--••-.- -------. -.--------------------- ------X

WHEREFORE, defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AS

SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, ("BUFFALO PUMPS") by its

attorneys, WILBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiff's complaint against defendant BUFFALO PUMPS with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant BUFFALO PUMPS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

,J\;,' \.J..:J. 'i .';.LL~_-.:.;J=,}tLJL ..'John S. Howarth, Esquire ,fNicholas 1,. Ortiz ,I

WILBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, NY 10005Attorneys for Defendant,Ail' & Liquid Systems Corp" as successorby merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.

--..-...-_-...-...---7,()J'j:30/1SSO ORDERED,

Justin W I ~squjre . .. .WEITZ AND LUXENBB'R{); 30 20,5700 BroadwayNew York, NY lOO~3." 1 (CLERK'S OFFICEAttorneys for Plah1tiff('s) NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

:NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50

_______________~i (Moulton, p.)This Document Relates to:

CIRODEROSA

i Index No.: 103657/97,

i NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: Ne.w. York, ~w York()c~ be.!' Y ,2015

~~LEDADAl'J\ ~(~ e~,. ~-Attorney for PlamtIffs Oel 30 LOLCiro DerosaWEITZ & LUXENBERG, ~.f\t CLERK'S OFFICE700 Broadway COU 'NEW YORKNew Yark, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

~~==------Courter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, __~<k--~,,----,~,--"_:'--- -_io/70fsHon. Peter H. Moulton

iI

__ 1122-2131/

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, .f?)

-------.,----------~

Index No.: 103657/97,

CIRODEROSANO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated:~ew York, *w YorkLr·:kJ,t?[ X ,2015

... ,I CU~HK'S OFF~yE.

_. CO-J\\(· NE.W YORK // . ." ~.....

/)~ I (f~- .~/ (~~i./.··~

~ . I . ·CaitfinBell, Esq.Attorney for Plainti s Attorney for DefendantCiro Derosa Treadwell CorporationWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.700 Broadway 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10004··(212) 558-5500 (212) 509-3456

-'-'! .

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

Ck1cG2CL/ ,"AbA)1')R~. £Sl:i . 'Attorney for PlaintiffsElsene A. BartlettWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50

______________~i (Moulton,.f?>This Document Relates to:

Index No.: 107404/02, 114328/02

ELSENE A. BARTLETTNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated:NewYork,NewYorkF \ LED(!):fPber 2 ,2015 <lo" ~

GeI3\)2G\.;f

,\',1 CLE.R~SOff\CE/h /COUN'NEWYORK vl

-------+-'1.-----------Matthew D. ~ par, Esq.Attorney for D' endantSafeguard Industrial Equipment Co.McGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, /22=-Hon. Peter H. Moulton ,J

J

324L6717E

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALLA.S. Part 50

------, --,------ ~ (Moulton, f)This Document Relates to:

Index No.: 107404/02, 114328/02

ELSENE A. BARTLETTNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkOciDbd' 2 ,2015

F I LEDOCT 302015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Ag.·~~....;2<..~ NE_WYORKK~k_---

~'''' \<'M\"TLi~ e~Attorney for Plai~tiffs . Attorney for DefendantElsene A. Bartlett Courter & Company, Inc.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.700 Broadway 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10004(212) 558-5500 (212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, /1(r IJPu /I-!J------;>h,e....~T~~--------___J/L=:... / 'l-tton. Peter H. Moulton

,J

,1122-6HI2

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50

______________~~ (Moulton, p.)This Document Relates to:

~ Index No.: 107404/02, 114328/02

ELSENE A. BARTLETT~ NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, Ne~ri LED04DblU' 2 ~Ol~

OCT3Q 2015

....-..............NTY ClERKS OFACE

ADA1\" QArm ;-5C-Attorney for Plaintiffs .Elsene A. BartlettWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

/---')./ / /"' (! .-./

/ /- .l Cl .. C/( '1~~-

Caitlin ~ell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, ~H.MOUltOn,J

1235-5607

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50: (Moulton,~)

----------------~

This Document Relates to:! Index No.: 107404/02,114328/02

ELSENE A. BARTLETT! NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

without costs.

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

F I LEDDated: New York, ~ew York

Uc-tDbv"", ,2015OCT 3\02015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFiCENEW YORK

A~~~-~QK.%~~~----

Attorney for Plaintif-fsElsene A. BartlettWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, /2I-'n. Peter H. Moulton

/o!10!;S7 '7'

J2383-2$SOE

/,/r

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50

_______________~~ (Moulton, f)This Document Relates to:

~ Index No.: 125767/99, 105485/00

HENRY ROBERT LENZ~ NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York F I LED()c±obu:2 ,2015 I

OCT 3'~ 2015

G::LQ-- - COUNTYCLER~~KOFAC,L ,~~':JAJ'V\ cS'D. . Matthew D. Sa ar, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff§ Attorney for~ ndantHenry Robert Lenz Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.700 Broadway 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10004(212)558-5500 (212)509-3456

,j

i

I.3.~~~SH2A~

._--'._"~.-.J

',) ..

.. ;J/J/J6/1s­

7 //H~ H. Moulton~SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, .f))

----------------~

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 125767/99,105485/00

HENRY ROBERT LENZNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. F , LEDDated: New York, New York

Q-kb.e.... 2 ,20150(1 3~ LG\5

NTY CLERK'S OFfiCECOU NEWYORK

Kerry~--------Atto~Courter & Company, Inc.MCGNNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

a'&~A1JI\M ~-E-~-}-_ -.---

Attorney for PlaintiffsHenry Robert LenzWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

i

/I!

r - .u22-1Iws3, iL '/

-;,---1

/?""'" Hon. Peter H. Moulton

SO ORDERED,

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50

_______________~i (Moulton, P)This Document Relates to:

i Index No.: 125767/99, 105485/00

HENRY ROBERT LENZi NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

SO ORDERED, ---:C;;:;7'L2'~,---------_--,-I----'~f-0()/ISHon. Peter H. Moulton

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkCt*be..r 2 ,2015

A:b~v\. QAt-tO-7 5(;lAttorney for Plaintiffs .Henry Robert LenzWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New Yark 10003(212) 558-5500

F' LEDOCT 302015

COUN1Y CLERK'S OFFICE

[{ftC ~I,~:::KCaitlin Bell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, f.)

-:-:------,------------------.c

Index No.: 125767/99, 105485/00

HENRY ROBERT LENZNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkU-fvbef '~, ,2015

FilEDOCT 3'02015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE .,. (),

_ua_~_k_'~'_'l_J2_-JL-'+-/!-H--, N_EWYOR/VvVt~A~AN\ QA-m-~-z;.;. Nicole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for PlaintIffs Attorney for DefendantHenry Robert Lenz Tishman Liquidating Corp.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.700 Broadway 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10004(212) 558-5500 (212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, ~---~JiJUjISHon. Peter H. Moulton

CCT2

2383-26048AH

COURTESY COpy

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

DONALD SPAETH, Individually and asExecutor of, Estate of Jean Spaeth

Index No. 190251110

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. (fonnerly known as Lucent

Technologies Inc.), individually and as successor in interest to Western Electric Company Inc.

for the purposes of the claims asserted herein (hereinafter "Alcatel-Lucent") hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Alcatel-Lucent with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cro~aims against

defendant Aleatel-Lueent be and the same hereby are dismissed witb p~udice and wlnL..€ 0Dated: ~ew~rk. New York OCT 3'

~. _. j;j__ ~ _' 2015 02015~ ~

N-i~Ch""'O'I8S· E. ~nvac~ Esq.:---~- - ~~~~C€L~vy Konigsberg, LLP LOCKE LORD LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendant800 Third Avenue, II th Floor 44 Whippany RoadNew York, NY 10022 Morristown, NJ 07960

SO ORDERED,~ECE~"ED

ocr 2 0 2U15AM 55068505.1

MOTION SUPPORT OFFICENYS 81 lPPi=ME GOLIRT . CIVIL

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK==========================================XRAMONA LEVY, Individually and as Executrix for theEstate of MARK N. LEVY, Index No. 190005-12

Plaintiffs,- against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, asSuccessor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS,COPES-VULCAN, INC., et aI.,

SECONDNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION

Defendants.==========================================X

CYNTHI . MES , ESQ.Hodges Walsh & Mes ~j~PAttorneys for Defendant 'Yo~COPES-VULCAN, INC.55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000

So Ordered:74-------TJ.~S.C. I ojJJj/5

Adam Raffo, Esq. ~Attorneys for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

WHEREFORE, Defendant, COPES-VULCAN, INC. (hereinafter

"COPES-VULCAN") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant, COPES-VULCAN, with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross

claims against defendant, COPES-VULCAN, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: White Plains, New YorkC:,c'''bD~r <0, 2015

HON. PETERH. MOlJLTON

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------xINRE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, p)

--------------------x

MILDRED ORGEK, Individually and as Administratrixfor the Estate of WILLIAM E.ORGEK,

Plaintiffs,

A.C. and S., INC., including, MORSE-DIESELINTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendants,

--------------------x

Index No. 104235/97

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as "Morse-Diesel

International, Inc."), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Morse Diesel,

Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York()e.'du~r ~ ,2015

Justin Weitz, HC17'''-'''­

WEITZ & LUXENBEAttorneysfor PlaintiffsMildred Orgek, Individually and asAdministratrixfor the Estate ofWilliam E.Orgek700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, djfu-;;o~n,::"pL.e-te""'r""'J-~L:::M==ou=l=:to=:::n=---=-=

Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for Defendant 1::"../Morse Diesel, Inc, ~

150 Broadway, Suite 600 " ~ ~New York, New York 10038 ()C,r ~/)

(212) 791-0285 Co( . JJI) 'J

/J\;?\, OIS'C

JvZ' /';::9:.VV y. II :\)\ ~

011f.-- v,t::-/.,'\ /C~

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------x

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

--------------------x

CATHERINE A. CAIAZZO, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of EDWARD A. CAIAZZO,

Index No. 104036/02119365/99

Plaintiffs,

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et ai.,including, MORSE-DIESEL INTERNAnONAL, INC.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants,

-------------------x

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as '''Morse-Diesel

International, Inc."), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Morse Diesel,

Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

osario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285

, Esq. 0U~\''''WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneys for PlaintiffsCatherine A. Caiazzo, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate ofEdward A. Caiazzo700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

ORDERED, that upon notice~ll co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are IJIt dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, NewYPtk OC)' ~AOC\()b(r ~ ,1~ ,J06 V

l}.c Of.]tV~/A<~Jt,

'1/Y; ;r-~

0Jl-t o~...c:-:

We;'" :lo~

/V J30i 12>I 7

Dated:--~f-"--+--'--=-----

SOORDERED,~----------­

tHon. Peter H. Moulton

..~SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 101206/99Plaintiffs,

Defendants.

-against-

A.C. & S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.

VINCENT E. PATURZO and JOANNE PATURZO,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

: MOTION AND ORDER AS TO: PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.: ONLY

-----------------------',

------------~,-----------;

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, 11

-z(J)

<zo

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiff's complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same

Adam Raffo, Esq.Attorney for Plaintif )Vincent E. Paturzo ana Joanne Paturzo,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Jesse Rodg s, Esq.Attorney r DefendantPeerless dustries, Inc.LEWIS RISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, Suite 2100New York, New York 10005(646) 666-76751863.21683

Dated: New York, New York.\j .

prejudice and without costs.

SO ORDERED, ------"L~------'=------:-t:-------------_-_-_-_-_-_-~7-rii)tJ)IS4'ion. Peter JJ Moulton 7· /.

4846-7948-9317.1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NE\V, YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ".

-zen<zo

KENNETH CARBOY AND MARTHA P. CARBOY,

PLAINTIFF(S),

-AGAINST-

A.C. & S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), ET AL.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, .(?)

Index No.: 107007/02,115364/02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER AS TOPEERLESS INDUSTRIES, IN.C.ONLY

DEFENDANTS.

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

10/70)(5r/ -

Adam Raffo, Esq.Attorney for Plaintif sKenneth Carboy and Martha P. CarboyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

~/~H~IIt1oulton

Je e odgers, Esq.rney for Defendant

Peerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

77 Water Street, Suite 2100New York, New York 10005(646) 666-76751863.29390

SO ORDERED,

defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costsF J LEDQ-iZ>ber r;;, dO )S

Dated: New York, New York OCT 302015

1'( CLERK'SNEWYORKOFRC~~L~

----,~=----=----~~:::::::::==----

4843-9237-6357.1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

: NO OPPOSITION[ SUMMARY JUDGMENT: MOTION AND ORDER AS TOi PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.: ONLY,

,,

Defendants.

-against-Plaintiffs,

ANDREW R. NIMMO JR. as Administrator for theEstate of GEORGE L. NIMMO

A.C. and S., INC., et aI.,

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, .f.)

-------------------~,

This Document relates to:j Index No.1 07220/02, 113435/02

-zen-<zo

WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Peerless Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

g~~w'-~Sq Al5i>,N\ ~)\ITb,€~Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Andrew R. Nimmo Jr. as Administrator for theEstate of George L. NimmoWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

302015

Il EDJes, Rodgers,A orney for Defendant

eerless Industries, JQp.,LEWIS BRISBOIS BIS'6)(~f$MfRK~FFIC77 Water Street, Suite 2IOONEW YORK ENew York, New York 10005(646) 666-76751863.22246

costs.

SO ORDERED, -'7"'-~----T7<--""'--------~-1Jb!£"(~.Moulton

4810-7178-16681

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------------------J(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

---------------------------------------------------------------------------J(JOHN LATKOWSHI, as Executor for the Estate of WILLIAMCUMMINS and JOHN LATOWSKI, as Executor for the EstateofNELLI CUMMINS,

Plaintiff(s),-against-

A.c. & S. INC., et aI.,

Index No.: 122173/1998

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Madina Axelrod, Esq.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------J(WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, A.W. Chesterton Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party. FDated: New York, New York I LED

Odvher 55 I dO J5-- OCT 3 '02015

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, p?eUNTY CLERK'S on:MAL McCAMBRIDGENEW YORK SIl~t;=ER & MAHONEY, LTD.

qg(2v{'FffiftkOrtiz, Esq. A!A~ \(~, ~S~"Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

SO ORDERED, ----;>,L-a;~-=:======:::~:::--Llr7f;S~ Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGAnON---------------------------------------------------------------------------)(BEATRICE FANTAUZZO, Individually and SUZANNETOCZEK as Administratrix for the Estate of CARLFANTAUZZO,

Plaintiff(s),-against-

A.C. & S. INC., et aI.,

Index No.: 10970812002

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.---------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, A.W. Chesterton Company, be and t~me are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs to either party. I LeODated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.

OCT 302015

COUNTYCLNEW~6~~OFFICE

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.

(Qb,G)'Fr;ank Ortiz,bA'" 12.A+fO, c:5Q,Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Madina Axelrod, Esq.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

SO ORDERED, __----r-L:7:---"'~__=__=__=__=__=__=__=_---.f!:.lcJJJolJSHOI}("i?e'ter H. Moulton t-j-'-

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIC:JATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------xPETER PACIFICO,

Index No.: 101665/06

P1aintifC-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO, ct. aL

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

LA.S. PaJ1l?f)0Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.--------------------------------------------------------------x

WHEREFORE, GREENE, TWEED & CO., INC., incorrectly named as "GREENE,

TWEED & CO., LLP, Individually and as· Successor to Palmetto Packings" (hereinafter

"GREENE TWEED') hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant

GREENE TWEED, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, GREENE TWEED, be and the samc are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

YorkE I. LED r

J ~JjJord-a-n-F-OX-++~-f---ll-J~ -~CT 3

01015 ...~JL~~-

BELLUCI COUNTY~LERKIS OFFICE SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGERAttomeys Plaintiff N W YORK & MAHONEY, LTD.546 Fifth Avenue Attorneys for DefendantNew York, New York 10036 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100(212)681-1575 New York, New York 10022

(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, -- ~ o~~-p~......te-r-l~-{~--M-(-)l-~l-~;-;~--·-·--·-....;.----·----.:..·----10;7715-

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

--------------------------------------------------------------------xELISE YARCZOWER, as Administratrix for theEstate ofARNOLD YARCZOWER, and ELISEYARCZOWER, Individually,

Plaintiff(s),-against-

A.C. and S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------x

Index No.: 102724/02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,

BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

\~1 \)~») rS

F ~ lEDJustin WeII25:,::hSi/l.

WEITZ & LU~ ~E~~Jr'~'CLERK'S OFFICEAttorneys for Piamtiff NEW YOIW:700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED, _--,,,--~~ _~oulton

Nicole G. Marko itz, Esq.SEGAL MeCAM RIDGE SINGER &MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(

In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:

MILDRED ORGEK, Individually and as Administratrixfor the Estate of WILLIAM E. ORGEK

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER-DORR OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.----------------------------------------------------------------------)(

NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P>

Index No.: 10423511997

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELERIDORR­OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELERIDORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: Q(\(:)\.)( f '), 2015Harrison, New York

WEITZ & LU)(ENBERG, P fC . 015Attorneysfor Plaintiff 0 T 30Z700 BroadwayNew York, NewYor60~CLERK'S OFFICE(212)558-5500 NEW YORK

SO ORDERED:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

---------------------------------------------------------------)(ELISE YARCZOWER, Individually and as Index No. 102724/02Proposed Executrix for the Estate of ARNOLD 122138/01YARCZOWER,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York\O} 0701\ r

WEITZ & LU)(ENBERG, P.C.Att eys for Plaintiffs

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompan)) , d Goodyear Can a Inc.

BY:,~l.l.""v~ ~) A /(.../

Lawrence G~ ee, EsqF I LED264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018 OCT 302015(212) 302-2400

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK .

SO ORDERED: 4 ---- 10/:]0)s/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, I.S.C.

· ,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------3CIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION---------------------------------------------------------------3CALICIA CALGIOVANNI, ESQ., as Administratrix: Index No.1 09020/00for the Estate of NICHOLAS A MANGINELLI, 121979/99

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

AC. & S. INC., et al.

Defendants.---------------------------------------------------------------3C

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yor , New York'(J 03/15"

WEITZ & LU3CENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company andGoodyear can~ Inc 'f: I L EBy: ;;;;f~u,-, ,/. 0

Lawrence G. Lee q. Ocr 302015

264 West 40th Street COUNry CL£R I

New York, New York 10018 N£WyO~~OFFICE(212) 302-2400

SO ORDERED: ~ IV/JojIS./' Hon. Peter H. Moulton, lS.C.

,-I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTYPRESENT: Hon. P.ter H. Moulton, Justice PART .A!l

WEllZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. \;~OMARCH 2014. FIFO

f \ \\ 1.\\'6Plaintiffs rut\ ~ 'S oer~\Cr:..

c\..~~¥:. ~ / a?-Io~ Idooa. vPHILIP R. ANZALONE (deeeP0~-0~~'J'! '{o~ Index. No. 1270&'2&92 .

(Mesothelioma)

RAYMOND BAKER(Lung Cancer)

RICHARD COLTON(Lung Cancer)

JOSEPH CURNYN (dec.)(Lung Cancer)

KARIN DEAN (dec.)(Other Cancer)

FRANK DUFFY (dec.)(Non-Malignancy)

HENRY D. HOLKA(Other Cancer)

JAMES E. MCCABE (dec.)(Other Cancer)

CHRISTIAN MERRILL(Other Cancer)

LYLE V. MOSSOW(Lung Cancer)

WILLIAM NORTON(Lung Cancer)

JOSEPH OLEXA (dec.)(Lung Cancer)

Index. No. 111414/1998

Index. No. 19001212011

Index. No. 190462/2010

Index. No. 101521/2005

Index. No. 107994/1999

Index. No. 114300/2002

Index. No. 113073/2002

Index. No. 11310211998

Index. No. 112280/2002

Index. No. 190134/2011

Index. No. 106209/2001

RICHARD J.• OTTALAGANO JR.(Lung Cancer)

JOHN J. PATTANE(Lung Cancer)

FRANKLIN POTTER(Lung Cancer)

ROBERT S. SABAOASZ (dec.)(Other Cancer)

SEYMOUR SAMUELS(Non-Malignancy)

WILLIAM ANTON STOCKHAUSEN(Lung Cancer)

WILLIAM T. TAYLOR (dec.)(Lung Cancer)

HERMAN VISGER(Lung Cancer)

RAYMOND M. WACHOWICZ (dec.)(Other Cancer)

301::1::10 ~~(Q~ M3N,-,,) &370 ' ,

A.<.NnOO

Index. No. 190018/20..40208 1JO

Index. No. 1901~ 7 I :JIndex. No. 102788/2000

Index. No. 109782/2000

Index. No. 19002412008

Index. No. 190062/2011

Index. No. 190053/2011

Index. No. 19018512011

Index. No. 107135/2000

TRANSFER ORDERPursuant to the direction of Hon. Peter H. Moulton, it Is hereby

ORDERED that the above-named Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. ca$es are being

transferred to Justice Cynthia Kern (lAS Part 55). Counsel are directed to contact

Justice Kern's Clerk at (646) 386-3289.

Dated: October 28,2015 ENTER: ~/~ =:--ETER H. MOULTON, J.S.C.

ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

Check one: DCase Disposed I9"Non-Final Disposition

SUPR.EME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTYPRESENT: Hem. Peter H. Moulton, Justice PART -AQ

WEITZ &LUXENBERG. P.C. ' .. ",.~ \) JUNE 2014 .. FIFO

~ \'<p~ ;:tI\tI ~Plaintiffs ru~\ oj ~sOf(f(\G

c\..~~o~¥-RAPHAEL ARONE (dec.) co\}~'\\~~'1'1 Index. No. 19010712009 v

(Lung Cancer)

CHARLES BAGGIANO, (Lung Cancer)

RALPH N. BORELLI(Lung Cancer)

FLOYD D.BOWDISH(Other Cancer)

CARL T. CARLSEN (dec.)(Lung Cancer)

JAMES WILLIAM CARR (dec.)(Lung Cancer)

DOUG CHAPPLE(Other Cancer)

WILLIAM T. CRUGER(Lung Cancer)

JOHN V. DE FORNE (dec.)(Mesothelioma)

WILLIAM C. ESPOSITO (dec.)(Lung Cancer)

FRANKIE FUGAT (dec.)(Lung Cancer)

RONALD D. HANDZLlK(Lung Cancer)

Index. No. 10038712008

Index. No. 11507511998

Index. No. 11757012002

Index. No. 116747/2007

Index. No. 111089/2002

Index. No. 190007/2009

Index. No. 190237/2011

Index. No. 190023/2012

Index. No. 116291/2004

Index. No. 190137/2009

Index. No. 103506/2002

AUSTIN C. JOERGER (dec.)(Lung Cancer)

WILLIAM E. JOYCE(Other Cancer)

RAYMOND A. MAZZA (dec.)(Other Cancer)

RALPH A. MENENDEZ(Other Cancer)

LEROY G. MITCHELL (dec.)(Non-Malignancy)

PAUL PARADISO(Lung Cancer)

JOHN P. PATTERSON SR. (dec.)(Lung Cancer)

WALTER A. REILLY (dec.)(Lung Cancer)

JOSEPH T. SANDER(Lung Cancer)

ROY F. SCHNETTLER (dec.)(Lung Cancer)

NELSON A. STRAUCH JR.(Lung Cancer)

JOSEPH P. SWIADOWSKY (dec.)(Lung Cancer)

RICHARD WESTON(Lung Cancer)

Index. No. 106973/2008

Index. No. 190172/2009

Index. No. 10091612008

Index. No. 10720812000

Index. No. 19011712012

Index. No. 19031012010

11 S/~d -:r/ doOQ .Index. No. .11i2'jIJ28et

Index. No. 100917/2008

Index. No. 19039112011

Index. No. 10181212008

Index. No. 10567111999

Index. No. 115633/2001

Index. No. 11571212007

TRANSFER ORDERPursuant to the direction of Hon. Peter H. Moulton, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-named Weitz &Luxenberg, P.C. cases are being

transferred to Justice Cynthia Kern (lAS Part 55). Counsel are directed to contact

Justice Kern'. Clerk at (646) 386..3289.

Dated: 01;10"r28,2015 ENTER:~~<. .. -­PETE.R H. MOULTON, J.S.C.ADMJNISTRATIVEJUDfJE

Check ol1e: D Case Disposed ~Non-Final DisposJtion