Upload
dinhnga
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
NYCAL
LA.S. PART 50
(Moulton, p>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
----------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
-------------------------------------- )(
Marilyn Kesar, as Administratrix for the Estateof Robert V. Kesar and Marilyn Kesar,individually,
INDE)( NO. 190020-15
(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.lOctober 2015In Extremis Trial Cluster)
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. Smith Water Products Co., et aI.,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.
Defendants.-------------------------------------- )(
WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto;
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York F I L ~ 0September5R.-, 2015 I;;
OCT ;;'. /1 I PO~~ 'eer -- 302015 ~~.
Patti Burshtyn,~. COUN Richard P. O'Leary, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 7Y CLERK'S Troutman Sanders LLP700 Broadway NEW YORK OFF1CE?375 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10174-0700212-558-5500 212-704-6000Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for DefendantThe Estate ofRobert V Kesar, dec'd Standard Motor Products, Inc.
SO ORDERED, ---7"'''---~~ ----lI'-=-l0IIJ rS7~rH. Moulton
Active 26605182v 1 999900.952301
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------------)(PHYLLIS HAUCK, Index No. 190246/12
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYPlaintiff, JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER-against-
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC., at at.,including ARVINMERITOR, INC.,
Defendants.
--------------------------------------------------------------)(
WHEREFORE, defendant Arvinmeritor, Inc., successor-in-interest to the former
automotive products segment of Rockwell International Corporation ("Arvinmeritor"), hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Arvinmeritor with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crosS-CI~against
defendant ArvinmeritOl' be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and Wit't"(:sts.Dated: Ncw York, New York DC/ i?'A~ C0u. 36 V
-c ~"~--------.. ~~~t:J~»:~~Michael Co an, Esq. Jordan D, . eltz, Esq, ~-r- ~~
NAPOLI, BERN, RIPKA, SHI<OLNIK & KASOWI. , BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN,£t,P
ASSOCIATES, LLP Attorna'ys for Defendant Arvinmeritor, Inc.Attorneys for Plaintiff 1633 Broadway350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7413 New York New York 10019,New York, NY 10018
SO ORDERED,
~"'===-I-Ion. P&erH. Moulton ~30//S
I
SUPREME COURT OF TIlE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION.f.......
-------------------------------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To: .;:
HENRY R. BETTKE and LOLA BETTKE,
:::'
--------------------------------------------------------------x
NYCALlA.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No.: 190260-15
NO OPPOSITIONSU~ARYJUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tecumseh Power Company hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Tecumseh Power Company, with prejudice, there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Tecumseh Power Company, be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Od-uiJA.! , 2 ~ ,2015New York, New York
Mark D. Debrowksi, Esq.HA~NSPARNELLTHACKSTON
&YOUNGLLPAttorneys jar DefendantTecumseh Power Compan~600 Lexington Avenue, 81 FloorNew York, New York 10022-7678(212) 897-9655
SO ORDERED,
11181445v.2
7.~ . ~SHon. Peter H. Moulton
F I LEDOCT 302015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------){IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton)
This Document Relates To:
HENRY R BETTKE and LOLA BETTKE,
• Index No.: 190260-15
"( NO OPPOSITION:' SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Platinum Equity LLC, Individually and as Successor in
interest to Tecumseh Power Company (hereinafter "Platinum Equity"), hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Platinum Equity, with prejudice, there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Platinum Equity, be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: . Oc ~17 (C ..• ,. L~, 2015New York, New York
Patti B·urshtyn, Esq. ,, .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintifJ~
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
1="11.. 12, (I OCr l)
P(.,zJ~tvrr 302015
Mark D. Debrowski, Esq. tv Cl..E:FjHAWKINS PARNELL TIIACK§"~~SO~~/C
& YOUNG LLP ~ 'E:Attorneys for Defendant, Platinum Equity LLC,Individually and as Successor in interest toTecumseh Power Compan~600 Lexington Avenue, 81 FloorNew York, New York 10022-7678(2J 2) 897-9655
SO ORDERED'~---i~~~~=-----_ -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-__-LJ/~U/fO/JSIt:~e~. Moulton
III 81447v.2
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
---------------------------------------------------------------)(WILLIAM WEIGOLD, Index No. 121090/02
113276/02Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------------)(
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorklOIO?:> [I~'
By:
WEITZ & LU)(ENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany and Goodyear Canada Inc.
,q~
s1 LED264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018 OCT 302015(212) 302-2400
COUNryCLERK'
NEW YOR~OFFICE:
SO ORDERED: « _tU/JO/IS<Hon. Peter H. Moulton, lS.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------J(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION---------------------------------------------------------------J(LINDA A. COOPER and JOHN E. BURNS SR., as: Index No. 116167/04Co-Executors for the Estate of OWEN F. BURNS 34778/92JR.,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.---------------------------------------------------------------J(
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 5(/)
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York\OJ03)')
WEITZ & LUJ(ENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
By: -f------,~=====-----=~_e_--- ... LED
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400
OCT 30 Z015
SO ORDERED: L2: ~ujJrlSZHon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------xBARBARA CONNOLLY, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE OF THE HEIRS AND ESTATE OFROBERT L. SIMMS, DECEASED, Index No.: 190386-11
Plaintiffs,
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.-------------------------------------------------------------------x
WHEREFORE, Defendant, F!v1C Corporation on behalf of its former Peerless Pump
and Chicago Pump businesses, and FMC Corporation on behalf of its former subsidiary, Crosby
Valve, Inc., improperly sued as FMC Corporation on behalf of its former Peerless Pump
Division and Chicago Pump Division and Crosby Valves (hereinafter "FMC"), hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiff s complaint against Defendant FMC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED. that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Chri~t~ph~~'''ti'~~£PU~JYCLERk'smOFFICEKELLEY JASONS MCGd'WWl\YORKSPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLP120 Wall Street 30lh FloorNew York, New York 10005Attorneys for Defendant Ftv1C Corporation
oOCT 301015
SO ORDERED, ~Mo;:;It;;'n~---
Defendant FMC be, and the same are hereby, dismissed \\1ith prejudice anFit,mtstE
Dated: New York, New York
L0/J-3 ,2015__-.n -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.t~.-•.-.~.--
~ ------CD~~. _m.mm__m )
KARST &:'VON OISTE, LLP576 Fifth Avenue, Suite 706New York, New York 10036Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------xJOSEPH ROBINSON AND PAMELA ROBINSON.HIS WIFE,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et aL,
Index No.: 190307-11
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
.·.·.-.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.'.·.wm _ .
Christopher Hannan, ES'hOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEKELLEY JASONS MCG'awA1'f..1EW YORKSPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLP120 Wall Street, 30th FloorNew York, New York 10005Attorneys for Defendant FMC Corporation
OCT 302015
Defendants.
-------------------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, Defendant, FMC Corporation on behalf of its former Peerless Pump
and Chicago Pump businesses, and FMC Corporation on behalf of its former subsidiary, Crosby
Valve, Inc., improperly sued as FMC Corporation on behalf of its fonner Peerless Pump
Division and Chicago PLilllP Division and Crosby Valves (hereinafter "FMC"), hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant FMC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant FMC be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costl EDated: New York, New York F ,
-.i<?/.2i) 2015
D~~KARST & VON OISTE, LLV576 Fifth Avenue, Suite 706New York, New York 10036Attorneys for Plaintiffs
o
SO ORDERED~=er=H=.=),=10=u=lt=o::n==-ooc;~lojJofS('i {\ "-c-I' i (... :,,-, i '-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------xHELEN T. GORMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASPERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE HEIRS ANDESTATE OF THOMAS P. GORMAN. DECEASED,..
Index No.: 190116-11PlaintifIs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, et aI.,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
-------------------------------------------------------------------xWHEREFORE, Defendant, FMC Corporation on behalf of its former Peerless Pump
and Chicago Pump businesses. improperly sued as FMC Corporation, on behalf of its former
Peerless Pump Division and Chicago Pump Division and Crosby Valves (hereinafter "FMC"),
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant FMC with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against 0Defendant FMC be, and the same are hereby. dismissed with prejudice andErthlt Ls.E
Datcd: Ncw York, New YorkLL _...2::~. 20 15
David Chandler:KARST & VON OISTE, LLP576 Fifth Avenue, Suite 706New York, New York 10036Attorneys for Plaintiffs
oel S'() 20\5
~CLERK'S OFFICE
Ci~~:T~t~;pl~;;:H~;~~~n, Esq. NEWYORK
KELLEY JASONS MCGO'Al ANSPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLP120 Wall Street, 30th FloorNew Yark, New York 10005Attorneys for Dcfendant FMC Corporation
SO ORDERED,.a-- - ----~poj)S-4·1on. Peter H. Moulton
This Document Relates to:
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
DEANNA L. SADOWSKI AS EXECUTRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF RICHARD ZINGARO ANDMARY ZINGARO, INDIVIDUALLY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
-----------------j (Moulton, fJIndex No: 128019102
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
OCT 302015
Dated: New York, New YorkCK~~b,r > ,2015
. ~U~ \ Wrl\-t.WEITZ & LV BERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
F I LED
(\ L/\COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Judith A. Yavitz, q.DARGER ERRA E YAVITZ & BLAV, LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 1ih FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
This Document Relates to:
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
DEANNA L. SADOWSKI AS EXECUTRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF RICHARD ZINGARO ANDMARY ZINGARO, INDIVIDUALLY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
----------------------i (Moulton, 1.)
Index No: 128019/02
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York()C~~f 3 ,2015
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
f\ LEOoe\ 3\~'l.G'5
Judith A. Ya . z, Esq.DARGER TE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorney or CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 1ih FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, ~~~==::::::=::~~uj]OJ1-.5ji6"n. Peter H. Moulton -=!:.:.j' I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DEANNA L. SADOWSKI AS EXECUTRIX FOR
THE ESTATE OF RICHARD ZINGARO ANDMARY ZINGARO, INDIVIDUALLY
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
(Moulton, 'f>Index No: 128019/02
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation
("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant
Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorka(\·"Ob~ r 3 , 2015
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yav' z, sq.DARGER TE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys, or Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 1i h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, ~ - !u J3uj1S/Hon. Peter H. Moulton I
This Document Relates to:
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
ELISE YARCZOWER, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF ARNOLD YARCZOWER, ANDELISE YARCZOWER INDIVIDUALLY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
---------------------i (Moulton, f.)Index No: 122138/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkaC~\)~r",\ ,2015
l4:a~~~~q. '"3u <~\."'\ \)..J~ •"'WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, EsDARGER ERRAN YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 1ih FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, ~~~ I{)J30/ISfin. Peter H. Moulton / I '
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ELISE YARCZOWER, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF ARNOLD YARCZOWER, ANDELISE YARCZOWER, INDIvIDUALLY
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
(Moulton, p.)Index No: 122138/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation
("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York()C)1.)~u S ,2015
sq. "':) u..7 "''\ We ,}--WEITZ & L NBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
F I LEDOCT 302015
Judith A. Yavitz, EsDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, ~ -- /{)/1J~S~H.Moulton -~. 7'
This Document Relates to:
AMERICO A. VARI AND ADELAIDE F. VARI
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
------------------1 (Moulton, p>Index No: 110331103
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., nlk/a Rhone Poulenc Inc. ("Amchem
Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant
Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs. f\LEDDated: New York, New York
()t'"t>~!: r 'i, , 2015
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
oel 30 '2.0i5
ERK'S OFFICE
COU~f\K
Judith A. Yavitz, EsqYDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,/7/-__ f
"7"~"'------==------- Pj~ /-S"..flon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON
This Document Relates to:
AMERICO A. VARI AND ADELAIDE F. VARI
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
(Moulton, f)Index No: 110331/03
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Dated: New York, New York~~\:)1'r 3 ,2015
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with pr!li&d
f \\.-without costs.
GCJ 'AO ?U\5
if'S Off\CE.T{ CLE.Rt'
COUN NE.'N '(aRK
. ~\A~." Wt 1M.WEITZ & LUX BERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, EsDARGER ERRANT YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, ~LZ...."e...-..-----=--=---=---=--=---=---10 boltstHon. Peter H. Moulton /..;. I'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON
This Document Relates to:
AMERICO A. VARI AND ADELAIDE F. VARI
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
(Moulton, p.)Index No: 110331103
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation
("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant
Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York()t~~'r "1 ,2015
J'u ';)'h", v,J,.,,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
F I LEDOCT 302015
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE AVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,/7~- lJ
-r-/_-~------=-rtJ/~oJISI4Oll:PeteiH. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
AMERICO A. VARI AND ADELAIDE F. VARI
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)Index No: 110331/03
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Oc..'m\)('r ?:> ,2015
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
FILEDOCT 302015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
WJudith A. Yavitz, Esq. 7DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, ~-----~~jifGn. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
RICHARD E. MORRIS
This Document Relates to:
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
-------------------j (Moulton, P)Index No: 112359/00
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Judith A. Ya . ,DARGER ERRAN YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York10 1011 ,2015
defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and£hl'
costs. f \ LOe\ 3Q20\S
SO ORDERED, _."e;-~-H---- ~/')/17~~lton /'-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RICHARD E. MORRIS
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 112359/00
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation
("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkV)/01 J ,2015
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
F I LEDOCT 302015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Judith A. Yavit ,DARGER ERRANTE VAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,/"1--.----:-J-r---..
~/~/ ---'-.:::.I()IJiJ~S4Ion. Peter H. Moulton I'
RICHARD E. MORRIS
This Document Relates to:
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
-------------------1 (Moulton, P.)
Index No:112359/00
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York__-'-"II........) I (y) I ,2015
FrM'lk Ortiz, "_}\t~ h '. \.1.):-;"WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
F \ LE 00(1 30 2015
TY CLERK'S OFFiCECOUN NEW YORK
Judith A. Yavitz, E .DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, ~PH""-~""nC-.p-e-t-er-H-.~==O=U-l-to=-n=-=-=-=--=-~;.-f-.-J-()/../..--S
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JAMES F. KINGSLEY
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
(Moulton, P)
Index No: 190081/12
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkOcJ-()\),·~- :?~ ,2015
F' LED0[1 S'() 20\5
C' UNTY CLERK'S OFFiCE
l/EWYORK
Judith A. Yavitz, EsDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, /2':---""7:;:/j/],.:,/IS{ Hon. Peter H. Moulton I I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JAMES F. KINGSLEY
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)Index No: 190081/12
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
{)(~·\vd" 1 , 2015
W:a~+ff~~~-.:s u)"'1\ We Ih..WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, EsDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ROBERT J. DUFFY AND FRANCES DUFFY
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 119234/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation
("Dana Companies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant
Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York_______, 2015
,~~~.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
f\ LEOQel 3'\) 2U'S
ClcR\<:S Off\CE.NI'fNcW'(ORK
Judith A. Yav' ,DARGER E E YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
This Document Relates to:
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
-----------------------1 (Moulton, P.)
Index No: 119234/01
ROBERT J. DUFFY and FRANCES DUFFY NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York\Q lo~ I 2015--------,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
FI LE 0OCT 3'02015
Judith A. Yavitz, E .DARGER ERRANT YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY--------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION--------------------------------------xGAETANO BARTOLONE and MARIE BARTOLONE,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION,et al.,
Defendants.--------------------------------------x
I.A.S. Part 50(Justice Moulton)
Index No.: 190398/14
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, GOULDS PUMPS, INC., requests summary
judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing
Plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant, GOULDS PUFS I Ir' E'e osmissed
with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkOctober 2, 2015
Esq.Levy Konigsberg LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs800 Third Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200
SO ORDERED:
OCT 302015
l:~SCl
and Dykman LLPneys for Defendant
ds Pumps I Inc.44 Wall Streetl 15 th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000Our File No.: 6754-13445
ICE
L'l----_---Jf.~tJll0/As·Hon. 1feter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
X:DUN/60096.llegaf/NOSJM/fifo case
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------)(PAUL J. LANDOLFI and ELIZABETH LANDOLFI,
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
- against- Index No.: 190258/14
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, et al.; NYCALLA.S. Part 50
Defendants,
-----------------------------------~-----------------------------)(
WHEREFORE, defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL INC. f/kla Dunkirk Radiator
Corporation and as Successor by merger to The Utica Companies, Inc. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs! complaint against defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL INC. flkla Dunkirk
Radiator Corporation and as Successor by merger to The Utica Companies, Inc. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL INC. f/kla Dunkirk Radiator Corporation and as Successor
by merger to The Utica Companies, Inc., be and the same are hereby ~i1etthEjUOand
ut costs.
,Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
SO ORDERED/2-:...-------I"''J/*=3-J/+-j,--=:)- --I \'i \Han. Peter Moulton I !' \
I\
I'\
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50
______________~i (Moulton, p,)This Document Relates to:
GLENN GERMAINEAND
MORAG GERMAINE
! Index No.: 190032115,,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY, JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Dravo Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintitfs'
complaint against defendant, Dravo Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Dravo Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
J::-,l.0['1
312'()
COu/\; 020/5lye/\;/2;/2f1l(s
_~~~~~~~~_YO-.:.'f1.~f(LO_'f:;....:..f:;!.C1.'12'Ken n· oak, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDravo CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P .C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York Ip004·-~ .....(212) 509-3456 ! ..-'''~-''
IjIfI.
SO ORDERED,a --Han. Peter H. Moulton
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Glenn Germaine and Morag GermaineSIMMONS HANLY CONROY, LLC
112 Madison AvenueNew York, New York 10016-7416(212) 784-6400
costs.
537-22
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : LA.S. Part 50________________~! (Moulton,1?)This Document Relates to:
GLENN GERMAINEAND
MORAG GERMAINE
!Index No.: 190032115,,
i NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Brand Insulations, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Brand Insulations, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Brand Insulations, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Glenn Germaine and Morag GennaincSIMMONS HANLY CONROY, LLC112 Madison AvenueNew York, New York 10016-7416(212) 784-6400
Ken . ook, Esq. O~
Attorney for DefendantBrand Insulations, Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, /J~7~erH. Moulton
I-·----"_·_~-""··_-~·----I I --0-, !r~~\
I L<::!)
I DCT :; 9 LJiSII "nf ~L
I ",i""-_..._'~-_.~< .._._-~---~~ ~ ~ ~
213-694
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50
~~__~~~__~~ ~! (Moulton, p.)This Document Relates to:
GLENN GERMAINEAND
MORAG GERMAINE
! Index No.: 190032/15,,,.,,
i NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Weir Valves & Controls, Individually, as successor to and
d/b/a Atwood & Morrill Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant, Weir Valves & Controls, Individually, as successor to and d/b/a Atwood & MOITill
Company, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Weir Valves & Controls, Individually, as successor to and d/b/a Atwood & Morrill
Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Kel . Cook, Esq.Attomey for DefendantAtwood & Monill CompanyMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attomey for Plaintiff(s)Glenn Germaine and Morag GermaineSIMMONS HANLY CONROY, LLC112 Madison AvenueNew York, New York 10016-7416(212) 784-6400
SO ORDERED, €crH. Moulton
963-2346
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
j Index No.: 190133/15,,,,,
! NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
ROBERT CASTERELLA
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
:NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50: (Moulton, .f?)
---------------~
WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against defendant, DAP, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, DAP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York_____,,2015
~ S Ij ---·--·····----6'" ~.D..A..~ .. Q~ ·1f"'0 t¥5':-_Carol Tempesta, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c. I:"-80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 r l INew York, New York 10004 ....(212) 509-3456
~~,oJshrS1mveJ {\1 ei~vJ ;\2.- r 7
Attorney for PlaintiffsRobert CasterellaMEIROWITZ & WASSERBERG, LLP845 Third Ave., 11 til Fl.N~w{ Ymk, New YOlk 10022(212) 897-1988-Zb?> D--c:P- JI>Ja.., , $ te- "Is-t>Nt-w '1Ui~1 ~"\ \cl.'1
SO ORDERED, d .....:----7 Hon. Peter H. Moulton
604-833
C! ? (; I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
This Document Relates to:
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, .p.>
--:--:-------:---------~
Index No.: 190115/15,ANGELO GUERRA
ANDANTOINETTE GUERRA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
SO ORDERED, _~,/2-~-======~~_~-==-tc)~~U;/~-~7Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Dated: New York, New York_____,,2015
Angelo Guerra and Antoinette GUCITil
MEIROWITZ & WASSERBERG, LLP845 Th.irrl Ave, 11th P:l. )...336r(JC(dwOty
-- Nevi YOlk, Nevi York 1Oez-2 tJV, U~ )(j:it7CJ(212) 897-1988
Zum IndListries, LLCMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.e.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212)509-3456 ;
I/j,
I
!I
"'~S::14H_!
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, f.')
---------------~
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190115115,
ANGELO GUERRAAND
ANTOINETTE GUERRA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against defendant, DAP, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, DAP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York_____;, 2015
d -=--==- j@ jJoJ/'Sti --=:::::::::: I 1
/Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SO ORDERED,
A~ /dU-LIJ ~~~.9;./})I,e~ I I Carol Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant 1:-,Angelo Guerra and Antoinette Guerra DAP, Inc. IMEIROWITZ & WASSERBERG, LLP MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. <-, J:::-,
-845 ThiTd Ave., 11th Ft. Z33 6roctJvJ~Y,)je1W80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 0Cl ' ()New Yefk, ~qew XI orR 10022 !J~GVY 1027'1 New York, New York ~04 :10;0(212) 897-1988 (212) 509-3456 U!I;/y 15
!I;~~~lyl('sYOIyI( Of::I'lC/2
604-834
--,'~) '.i; J
, :)
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGAnON
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
: NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, .f.)
---------------~
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH P. HADDENAND
ELEANOR HADDEN
Index No.: 190386114,
, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York0e40 ber ~ ,2015
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
~/l..OC1
3~D
COUIv 0;0/5lyCI..Iv12W I2IYIfS
. ~IrO~I7C~Wf\IlAM/~. .AMaria J. Ciccia, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, _-;;1-'---~~ ~St'HLPeter H. Moulton
I,i,I
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALlAS. Part 50
(Moulton, £r---------------------;This Document Relates to:
Index No.: 190146/15,
GEORGE MORRISON AND ROSEANNE MORRISONNO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
, MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Ductmate Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment
III the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Ductmate Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant,
Ductmate Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Nit Y2~' ~w York) , 2015
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)George Morrison and Roseanne Morrison
WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
L u OCT 302015
~ElCECarol Tempesta,ES~=oR:Attorney for DefendantDuctmate Industries, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.e.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, __~~'----__-_-_-_------------~---~oJ)57 Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL,
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : LA.S. Part 50________________~! (Moulton, ~This Document Relates to:
RICHARD J. PENESKIAND
MARY ANN PENESKI
! Index No.: 190552112,
,
!NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, be and the same are ~bY dismissed with prejudice
and without costs. I L E: 0Dated: New York, New York
Ck:tobl<:.f' ~ , 2015
AWL (2 M'~fD, €.)~ •Attorney for PlaintiffsRichard J. Peneski and Mary Ann PeneskiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
) _,J
OCT 302015
COUNTYCLF::RI('S
NEW 'fOR OFFIC£2
A.A~===:::::::=:::::.-Nicole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantAtwood & Morrill CompanyMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
aHon. Peter H. Moulton
SO ORDERED,
963-1390~ Ci\iTi
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
i Index No.: 190101115,
i NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY': JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
ITALO A. POMPONIAND
EILEEN POMPONI
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
: NYCAL:, LA.S. Part 50: (Moulton, f)
----------------~
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
In the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
Maria Ciccia, E .Attorney for De endantThe Fairbanks CompanyMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
// ------ 113</'s40n. Peter H. Moulton
Attorney for PlaintiffsHalo A. Pomponi and Eileen PomponiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew Yark, New Yark 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
ew York
------'--"'--1f--'-L-~t__' 2015
without costs.
504-1478
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50: (Moulton, f.)
----------------~
This Document Relates to:
ITALO A. POMPONIAND
EILEEN POMPONI
: Index No.: 1901 01/15,
~ NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 32 I2, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
prejudice and without costs.
defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, be and the same
Attorney for PlaintiffsHalo A. Pomponi and Eileen PomponiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,_~~ -,---ld+I-=-7<J1107 Hon. Peter H. Moulton
,'_. -' j .• J
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50
_______________~: (Moulton,.f?)This Document Relates to:
ITALO A. POMPONIAND
EILEEN POMPONI
: Index No.: 190101115,
: NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New ~ork, N~ York\t" ',1-:-1 ,2015~\
Attorney for PlaintiffsHalo A. Pomponi and Eileen PomponiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
5354419
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50: (Moulton,p>
----------------~
This Document Relates to:
ITALO A. POMPONIAND
EILEEN POMPONI
,
i Index No.: I901 01115,
i NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New .Trk, N~ York\'C') 'd-,"J , 2015
Attorney for PlaintiffsHalo A. Pomponi and Eileen PomponiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, d-1H0n. Peter H. Moulton
963.2AJ~
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50: (Moulton, p)
----------------~
This Document Relates to:
SOL P. RASKINAND
MONA RASKIN
: Index No.: 190005115,
: NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
III the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New \ ark, Nr~ Yark\~') .-a.-J ,2015
\
Attorney for PlaintiffsSol P. Raskin and Mona RaskinWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
~/(.
~I:()Maria Ciccia, Esq. 1v/2~/2f:tIr~Attorney for Defendant Y0,.<t, SO~The Fairbanks Company tr ~C'~MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, -----:r-d--==~::::::::-------~-----..----"".r__:/o/71ISdon. Peter H. Moulton
504"14,31
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 190288/14In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON
ARTHUR MCCARTHY,
- against-
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et aI.,
Plaintiff(s),
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
SO ORDERED,
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section- 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and c~s claims against
Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed~trfptud~and
without costs to either party. c: DOcr 3··
Dated: MQfCn ~"'~ ,2015 COUNty 02015
~New. York'.NeWYo.rk CL.£A
// N£V1; ~ ~/s Or:.
~~;" \.Ilc,It,,,,,, Katrt~~:I'~~, Esq. Of/I( "'ICt;
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGEAttorneys for Plaintiff SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.700 Broadway Attorneys for DefendantNew York, NY 10003 Aurora Pump Company(212) 558-5500 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
/~ :=::::::::::". _/d..?o J/s7.u:iherrYKkin IIeitler - ;-"/ /
RON. PB'fERH.MOVLTON
• r • [
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------------xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
-----------------------------------------xThis Document Relates To:
Darett Chantilope, as Administratrix for the Estate ofMargarito Chantilope, and Darett Chantilope, Individually
-----------------------------------------x
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, p)
Index No: 190083115
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CLYDE UNION, INC. hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against defendant CLYDE UNION, INC. with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CLYDE UNION, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
/o/2(J/SDated:
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
t: I L E: DVirginia Squitieri, Esq.o WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
CT 302015 EDELMAN & DICKER LLPCo Attorney for Defendant
UNry CLE~R I CLYDE UNION, INC.N£W YO~S OFFIC~ 150 East 42
ndStreet
K New York, New York 10017212-490-3000File No. 07723.00153
SO ORDERED, _----::;~r-.~~---========~~~~-I()J)vjISHon. Peter H. Moulton I
6967643v.\
! ' "
"- ,-)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-------------------.x
-------------------x
INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALLA.S. Part}if S""OfHeitlet, J.)
ARTHUR R. MCCARTHY and JANET MCCARTHY,
Plaintiffs,
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., including,MORSE DIESEL, INC.
Defendants,
-------------------x
Index No. 190288/14
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York() (ro\)cr ') ,2015
Ma~"~h'" W",,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneys for PlaintiffsArthur R. McCarthy and Janet McCarthy700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
F I LEDE;?--o-cno 2015
Rosario Chetta, Esq. CQ~CLERK'SOFFICEMALABY & BRADLEY, LLfiEWYORKAttorneys for DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285
so ORDEREDe ~ted:_---'-!-tbIL.:J:.......,0f-/:......:/S=-- _CMan. Sherry Klein Meitler - r I
HON. PE'rERH. MOULTON_
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 190182115In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITlGATION
VINCENT COSTELLO,
P1aintiff(s),NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
- against-
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et ai.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
FI LEDOCT..3.0 2015
COU~~ME \ SOFFICE
Katrina~._hy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDEREQ IcJboJ/sHon. Peter H. Moulton / 7
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party.
en St. George,WEITZ & LUXE BERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-----------------------------------------------------------------xWALTER HAZARD and SUSAN HAZARD,
Index No.: 190377114
Plaintiffs,-against-
A.W. CHESTERTON, et. al.
Defendants.
--------------------------------------------------------------x
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
l.A.S. Part~ 5'"'0 'Bon. SheIl y K. Hettlel
WHEREFORE, GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER DENVER")
hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant GARDNER
DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
OCT 302015
COUNTYCLERK'S OFF
~r------- NEW YORK ---~-e...fC-----~1
Dated:
Jordan ox,BELLUl-'!.....f~IVVAttorne or Plaintiff546 Fifth AvenueNew York, New York 10036(212)681-1575
SO ORDERED, ?H:. K' U-'-'-t1
-- ---OIl. ..,uerry . nt;lIer--
Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the satTle are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to . ither party. F I LED ~ .
RON. PETERH, MOULTON
....
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-----------------------------------------------------------------xGAETANO BARTOLONE and MARIE BARTOLONE,
Index No.: 190398/14
Plaintiffs,-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEM CORPORATION, et. aI,Hon. Peter H. Mooulton
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------x
WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DE:--JVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER
DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant
GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party.
-----. OCT 302015 f ~ v(;l
John uinan, Esq. ..)"''''''~> v.:;~~CL tNlsn S. L i i, Esq.L Y KONIGSBERG, LLP I f.n:W~RK'S OF e@AL Mc IXMBRIDGE SINGERAttorneys for Plaintiff ORK & MAHONEY, LTD.800 Third Avenue Attorneys for DefendantNew York, New York 10022 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100(212) 605-6200 New York, New York 10022
(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED, .//.......---=:=========/i~()f-/Juj;sl(.I~t~~fCMoulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTQS LITIGATION
-----------------------------------------------------------------xJOSEPH MAETKE, Index No.: 190373/14
Plaintiffs,-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER .
ABB, INC., et. al. LA.S. Part 50Han, Peter H. Moulton
Defendants.---------------------------------------------------------------------x
WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER
DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant
GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
F, LEDwithout costs to either party.
+rtl~~...."~~~~ M5~~::A:':O:FFwiC~~WEITZ & LUXENEBRG, PC •~W YORK ''s~GAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGERAttorneys for Plaintiff & MAHONEY, LTD.700 Broadway Attorneys for DefendantNew York, New York 10003 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100(212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10022
(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,. 0~ ~._...__.. /O/;>oJ!!~.-P-~~oulton
,j
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------~--------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
------------------------------------------------------------------------)(JEFFREY HOWER and NANCY HOWER, Index No.: 190132/15
- against-
ABB, INC., et a1.,
Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITIONSl)MMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
LA.S. PartJO 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Dated: Oc.tt>~U ~ ,2015New York, New York
~fILEDWEITZ & LUXENBERG,(Jt<r:'3 02015Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York New Yor1«rW'b"§y CLERK'S OFFICE(212) 558-5500 NEW YORK
Defendants.------------------------------------------.._----------------------------)(
WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER
DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant
GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party.
Kevin W. Turbert, Esq.SEGAL McCAM"6RIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantGardner Denver, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED, -----:"L.·L2~~.-..-----:::::::::::::::::=========--.!-~~~/C~OJIS7 Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
------------------------------------------------------------------------)(BRANKO SRICA and LJUBICA SRICA, Index No.: 190445/14
PlaintitlS,
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY,JUDGMENT MOTION
l.A.S. Part 3ft' SOHon. Peter H. Moulton
Defendants.
------------------------------------------------------------------------)(WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER
DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice I.Jaw and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant
GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
without costs to either party.
Dated/olCf0 2015N~w York, New York
Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
~ll.----2 OCr30 I$'()/~.;.Vlvh_ 201$
/ ')'c',/ • "tv.~~,L~-2.~ ~/(I(~Kcvin W. Turbert, Esq. O/(I( O;::-f::jSEGAL McCAMBRIDGE IC~SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantGardner Denver, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED, .A- ~=~=_J.'j7.J;S~'~~Pet~rH. Moulton
C ri tophe manelli, Esq.W ITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-----------------------------------------------------------------xROBERT CASTERELLA,
Index No.: 190133/15
Plaintiff(s),-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
3M COMPANY, et al.
Hon. Peter H. MoultonDefendants.
-------------------------------------------------------------------x
WHEREFORE, Defendant L&M MFG., INC., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against Defendant L&M MFG., INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,
S el Meirowitz, E q.MEIROWITZ & W~ SERBERG, LLP seGAL c MBRIDGE SINGER &
L
Attorneys for Plaintiffs MAHONEY, LTD.845 Thitd ine., 11 th Floor Z:53 e(~~J.w<t'1' Sl€-1fn Attom~ys for Defenda.ntNew York, NY 1-OOZZ Nev-> "/0 {t, N'I \01,1\ 850 ThIrd Avenue, SUite 1100
NewYork,NewYork 10022
L&M MFG., INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either
party. J: II.. ~Dated: New York, New York OCr D
Co 302015I0 II~J 6lDI5 Utvty
tvE:C'-£RI('s/Itt YOAI( Of:f:/CI2
SOORDERED,_~LZ~.-71""-~-~--==-'::::-- /uJJO~5Hon. Peter H. Moulton ~7"
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK--------------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION--------------------------------------------------------------------xFREDERICK JOSEPH CICIO AND JACQUELINEA. CICIO,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
ALFA LAVAL INC., et al.
Defendants.-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 190207114
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint
against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,
BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissedFh rej[ce~ w[jut costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
Matthew P , sq.EARLY, LUCARELLI, SMEISENKOTHEN, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017
OCT 302015
John uerriero, Esq.SEGA McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022
SO ORDERED, _--"'&2'----'-"'"'--__:~:::_-_-_-_-_-~-Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-------------------------------------------------------------- ---- --xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION--------------------------------------------------------------------xMARIE GRACE BEST as Executrix for the Estate ofJOSEPH BARRY BEST and MARIE GRACE BEST,
PJaintiff(s),-against-
ALFA LAVAL INC., et al.
Defendants.-------------------------------------------------------- ------ ---- ---- -x
Index No.: 190109/14
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
.tlon. £hen, Klein Ileitlei
WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries (incorrectly named
as "FLOWSERVE U.S. INC. Individually and as Successor to BYRON JACKSON PUMPS") hereby
requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., specifically as to the
product lines of Byron Jackson Pumps and Borg Warner Pumps, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,
BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs t0f!:erarty.
Dated: NewYo,k,NewYock - LEDtk~~(')\~u\S OCT 302015
~ lli~~ L/)/ , {L~~\JI.j ~OUNTyCI.~A~~OFF/Cf:~~ESC(' Nicole G. Markowitz,THE EARLY LAW FIRM SEGAL McCAMBRIDAttorneys for Plaintiffs MAHONEY, LTD.360 Lexington Ave., 20lh Floor Attorneys for DefendantNew York, NY 10017 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, New York 10022
So Drd~rtcl:a --==Io/:lfsHON. PErERH.MOULTON
SUPRElvlE COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NE\V YORK-- --------------- ------- --- ----------------- ---- -- ---------- -- ---------X
In Rc NEW YORK COUNTYASBES'I'OS LITIGATION
------- -------- ---------- ------- --- ----------------- ------- ------ ---- --XThis documcnt relates to:
NYCALLA.S. Partl!f' S- 0(Moulton, f?>
Index No.: 122203/99109280/00190298115
EDWARD T. PALMER and ELEANOR PALMER,
Plaintiffs,-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et a!.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY.JUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEEI,ERJDORR-OLIVERBOILER COMPANY
Defendant.-- ----- ------- --------- ------------ -- -------- ----- ------ ------- -------X
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLlVER BOILER COMPANY hcreby rcqucsts
MARIN GOODMAN, LIt>.Attol'llcysfol' Dcfclldallt )KEELER/DORR-OLIVE iOlLERCOMPANY500 l'vlamaroneck Ave, Suite 50 IHarrison, New York 10528(2 12) 661-115 I
summary judgmcnt in thc abovc-entitled casc, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plainlifTs' complaint against defendant KEELER/DOlm.-OLlVER BOILER COMPANY
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that lIpon notice to all co-dcfendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLlVER BOILER COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: October20, 2015Harrison, NY
e .LUXENBERG, PC
AttoI'lleys fol' P/ailltUr F.,. L700 Broadway E 0New York, NY 10003 .(212) 558-5500
OCT 302015
COUN~~~~~~OFRCESO ORDERED:
/~H. Moulton, J.S.C.
A,SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION---------------------------------------------------------------)(CLIVE K. TAYLOR and CLARICE TAYLOR, Index No. 190113115
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50
---------------------------------------------------------------)(
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear 11'&.RubberCompan)j and Goodye anad Inc. .I l.
~",,-----,~_:~~~~-B-Y: OC~ J:DCarmen V. St. George, Esq. , Esq. C 30201':
Ol.JlVry .;
IVt:;f/;t:;!y1('8YO!y o;:::~
'f( Ct:;
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
SOORDERE~ Ic)h~__.l"Io~. Moulton, lS.C. 7
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------xJOSE RIVERA AND CARMEN RIVERA, HIS WIFE,
Index No.: 190208-12Plaintiffs,
-against-
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et aI.,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT~v10TION AND ORDER
Defendants.----------------------------------------------------------.--------x
WHEREFORE, Defendant, FMC Corporation on behalf of its former Peerless Pump
and Chicago Pump businesses, and FMC Corporation on behalf of its former subsidiary, Crosby
Valve. [nc., improperly sued as FMC Corporation on behalf ofits former Peerless Pump
Division and Chicago Pump Division and Crosby Valves (hereinafter "FMC"), hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant FMC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant FMC be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: ~:\V~o/~Z2~~;~ 1=1 LEDD~ ~ Oil 302015 Christopheriiaii;;iill,Es-q-.--
KARST & VON OISTE, £f)£jN7Y C KELLEY JASONS MCGOWAN576 Fifth Avenue, Suite 706 NE~ERKISOFF/ SPINELLI HANNA & REBER, LLPNew York, New York 10036 YORK Cq20 Wall Street, 30th FloorAttorneys for Plaintiffs New York, New York 10005
Attorneys for Defendant FMC Corporation
l
.1
II eCT ;: [~i~- II
!
L,__ . -----.-----..--~(~.-.-_J
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MARK RICCI
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, (?)
Index No: 190224/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated:
__-+-='-"--_, 2015
"~F I LED
opher A. Romanelli, Esq. Jonathan B. Kromberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Jl.ARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff COUNTY CLER~~KOFFI~ltorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Broadway NEW Y 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,.----?__--I..:::.,lo~l}()·Jls/~ 77'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGAnON
This Document Relates to:
JEFFREY HOWER and NANCY HOWER
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton,~)
Index No: 190132/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Cooper Industries, LLC, incorrectly sued as Cooper Industries,
Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Cooper
Industries, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Cooper Industries, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Ckto'orr , ,2015
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
t:ILEOOCT 302015
CLERK'sNEW YORK OFFICE
B. Kromberg, Esq.DA· ER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Cooper Industries, LLC116 East 27th Street, 1i h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, ItJ/JujI. ~r~
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JEFFREY HOWER and NANCY HOWER
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)Index No: 190132/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,
Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/kla Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a ~r Cropscience,
Inc. be and the sarne arc hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. I l.. t: 0Dated: New York, New York OCT
O<:l{)\Yr , , 2015 Co 302015UNry
tv CI.ERk'SEW YORk O~~/C~
G~~u.,,:, Ul,:h , E'l -J"--o-n-a--:7-.rn'-:-:-B-.--:-K-r-om---:-b-er-g-,-E-sq-.--------
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. D GER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 1i h FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, /L----~c...::~~)ibn. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGAnON
This Document Relates to:
JEFFREY HOWER and NANCY HOWER
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
Index No: 190132/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Ocl-o\)(f ,20151=1 LED
OCT 302015
,,~:,,' .,\ -J-o-n-at-h-a-n+-.-r-r-o-m-b-er-g-,-E-s-q.--------
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e. DAR ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, // --=:I4)n:PeterH. Moulton
This Document Relates to:
ERNEST A. DE CURTIS
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
-------------------j (Moulton,~)
Index No: 19025112015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
~---_~~o//~-Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Dated: New York, New York1011.- \ ,2015
~WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
qNJudith A. Yavit~: ~q.DARGERE~NTEYAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
This Document Relates to:
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
JUDITH D. JEFFERSON AS EXECUTRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF BRUCE E. JEFFERSON ANDJUDITH D. JEFFERSON INDIVIDUALLY
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
------------------j (Moulton, .9.)Index No: 190006/13
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE AVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
), ''"' ( .h..WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are Pbldtissed with prejudice and without
costs. . E 0Dated: New York, New York OCT 302015
QC':-()\a(r 3> ,2015 COUNTy CLE~R I
NE:W YO~~OFF=/C€
Ut/
SO ORDERED,~ Peter H. Moulton
!o}2(J);.S7 I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JUDITH D. JEFFERSON AS EXECUTRIX FOR
THE ESTATE OF BRUCE E. JEFFERSON AND
JUDITH D. JEFFERSON, INDIVIDUALLY
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)Index No: 190006/1,13
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Oc. 'ttl\)rr 3. ,2015
. ~ "'~, "'" \Jj(.NWEITZ & L ERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY to038(212) 558-5500
F' lEDOCT 802015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Judith A. Yavitz, EsDARGER ERRA YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, --7"'-~~~::::::::::::=====~/J~j&*4fun. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NORMA JASON, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF ROBERT JASON, AND NORMAJASON, INDIVIDUALLY
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
(Moulton, f.)
Index No: 190230112
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 1i h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. FI LEDDated: New York, New York OCT 30201'1:
QC)Pbt-f.3 ,2015 J
COUN/\/I T CLERK'NEW 'fOR~OFFIC€
SO ORDERED, ~-------.!r('!:!..,U/2!)l~/Hon. Peter H. Moulton
..
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, .f.jIndex No: 190230112
NORMA JASON, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF ROBERT JASON, AND NORMAJASON, INDIVIDUALLY
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Q(t1)b(r 3 ,2015
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016
(212) 452-5300 F, LEDOCT 302015
L?-----...1...&/J~GOUNTY CLERK'S 0ji6ii. Peter H. Moulton NEWYORK FFICE
SO ORDERED,
l;1.;aB*'~~~q. ~U)ll'" Wt'i 1"\,
WEITZ & LU ENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
This Document Relates to:
CHARLES BONA AND PATRICIA BONA
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALLA.S. Part ?-.O
--------------------1 (Moulton, 1'6Index No: 190562/12
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York()crui.>er.3 ,2015
mrnic'i:n"~.:b§lq. '3U) \...., \}J ( "h...WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavi Esq.DARGER E TE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys D chern Products, Inc.116 East 2i Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, /2-----~rs~Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY--------------------------------------XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION--------------------------------------xThis Document Relates to:NATALIE JURSON, as Executrix for theEstate of KARL JURSON, and NATALIEJURSON, Individually
FILEDOCT 30 2015
COUNTY
NE~~6~~OFFICE
Index No.: 108082/06
Plaintiff(s) ,
- against -
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Austin D. O'Malley,{sq.Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantMARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO.,INC.44 Wall StreetNew York, New York 10005212-732-2000Our File No.: 10~24~5312
-=-:&I3u/f~ I .':--'-":I!,:' -';'J-~. i
! Tk :Ji ',i I'I ,5 I
i :(--- ----~. .~J!",-, __. C'\i/, i
-..,..-. -....~ " 'L i
H~ H. Moulton,So Ordered:
", C".,"'<••••, ,.::>.~,;~.__ , Esq.
Weitz "&L~xenbe~, P. C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)NATALIE JURSON700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003212-558-5500
Defendants.--------------------------------------x
WHEREFORE, defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC.,.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against
defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING
CO., INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkOcrok~~_, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK----------------------------------------xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION----------------------------------------xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moul ton, P.)
JOSEPH C. MCKENDRY, Index No.: 01/113335
Plaintiff(s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.----------------------------------------x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
LED
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
cobs,WEITZ & LUXENAttorneys for700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
ithout costs.
----=-H6c:-7'4"'-.---..~e-t-e-r--::Hc::--.-::M-=-O-U--:l=-t,---o-n-----!-V/ ]V!ISSO ORDERED,
John J. FanninCullen and DykAttorney for DNATIONAL GRID G44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
hereby
Dated: New York, New York_--,-q~tf) ,
X:DUN60S86.llegallNOSJMlaugust2015
SUP~ME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------)(ELISE YARCZOWER, as Administratrix for the Estate NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYOf ARNOLD YARCZOWER and ELISE YARCZOWER, JUDGMENT MOTION ANDIndividually, ORDER
Plaintiff(s),
- against-
A.C. & S. INC., et al.;
Defendants.-----------------------------------------------------------------)(
Index No.: 102724/02
NYCALLA.S. Part}6 S ()
WHEREFORE, defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL INC. f/k/a Dunkirk Radiator Corporation
and as Successor by merger to The Utica Companies, Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL INC. f/k/a Dunkirk Radiator Corporation and as Successor by
merger to The Utica Companies, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendants
ECR INTERNATIONAL INC. f/k/a Dunkirk Radiator Corporation and as Successor by merger to The
Utica Companies, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
_-E-lLE~-Justin Weitz, Esq. Michael Cromer, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffs 0[1 30 LGiS Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Weitz & Luxenberg Barry McTiernan & Moore700 Broadway RK"~ OFFICE 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor
nilli"NTV CLE ;;,New York, New York 1~ . NEW YORK New York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED, /2.., ~SMQR, Sbetry l(l@iFl: Heitlei'
HON. PETERH. MOULTON
'I
II
. il11
i'!,"
:1
II
II
X:IFBW39092IlegaVAPRlL20J6
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
'-----------------------------------------------------------------)(CONO AMILA MASCARELLA,
Plaintiff(s),
- against-
A.C. & S, Inc., et al.
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------)(
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Index No.: 109071100
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
(J&&' UJ!J '!l., '"/ ~ !.J!&hik,
Chelsea Beshore, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
I
I
IIIII
,III[I
'I,III
~'II1FILED/'(fftJu (J [1 3Q2015
pIra.n Alvarado, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenb~UN TV CLERK'S OFFICE700 Broadway NEW YORKNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-550
SOORDE~ -----HJI30i/SHon. Peter Moulton ( -/ ':: /'
IL.
( ,
/ I
CLB56003/1egaVnosjm
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------J(PHILOMAE S. DONOVAN, Individually and asExecutrix ofthe Estate of JOHN J. DONOVAN,Deceased,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aI.,
Defendant(s),
-----------------------------------------------------------------J(
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 109913/07
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
defendants C
ice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
S, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
Shawnette ,sq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
.,-~
, .)
SO ORDERED,~4Io:eterMOUlton
lo/JoJrs,. r 7
_.._-_._-\\
\\
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-.-----------------------------------------------------------XIN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION------------------------ ----- ----------------- -..,_."..-. -- -••-XThis Document Relates to:
ELISE YARCZOWER, as Proposed Executrixfor the Estate of ARNOLD YARCZOWER, andELISE YARCZOWER, Individually
NYCALLA.S, Part~ r; a(Moultan, p>
Index No: 102724/02NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
.--._--- --.--••-.- -------. -.--------------------- ------X
WHEREFORE, defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AS
SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, ("BUFFALO PUMPS") by its
attorneys, WILBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiff's complaint against defendant BUFFALO PUMPS with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant BUFFALO PUMPS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
,J\;,' \.J..:J. 'i .';.LL~_-.:.;J=,}tLJL ..'John S. Howarth, Esquire ,fNicholas 1,. Ortiz ,I
WILBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, NY 10005Attorneys for Defendant,Ail' & Liquid Systems Corp" as successorby merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.
--..-...-_-...-...---7,()J'j:30/1SSO ORDERED,
Justin W I ~squjre . .. .WEITZ AND LUXENBB'R{); 30 20,5700 BroadwayNew York, NY lOO~3." 1 (CLERK'S OFFICEAttorneys for Plah1tiff('s) NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
:NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50
_______________~i (Moulton, p.)This Document Relates to:
CIRODEROSA
i Index No.: 103657/97,
i NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: Ne.w. York, ~w York()c~ be.!' Y ,2015
~~LEDADAl'J\ ~(~ e~,. ~-Attorney for PlamtIffs Oel 30 LOLCiro DerosaWEITZ & LUXENBERG, ~.f\t CLERK'S OFFICE700 Broadway COU 'NEW YORKNew Yark, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
~~==------Courter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, __~<k--~,,----,~,--"_:'--- -_io/70fsHon. Peter H. Moulton
iI
__ 1122-2131/
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, .f?)
-------.,----------~
Index No.: 103657/97,
CIRODEROSANO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated:~ew York, *w YorkLr·:kJ,t?[ X ,2015
... ,I CU~HK'S OFF~yE.
_. CO-J\\(· NE.W YORK // . ." ~.....
/)~ I (f~- .~/ (~~i./.··~
~ . I . ·CaitfinBell, Esq.Attorney for Plainti s Attorney for DefendantCiro Derosa Treadwell CorporationWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.700 Broadway 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10004··(212) 558-5500 (212) 509-3456
-'-'! .
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
Ck1cG2CL/ ,"AbA)1')R~. £Sl:i . 'Attorney for PlaintiffsElsene A. BartlettWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50
______________~i (Moulton,.f?>This Document Relates to:
Index No.: 107404/02, 114328/02
ELSENE A. BARTLETTNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated:NewYork,NewYorkF \ LED(!):fPber 2 ,2015 <lo" ~
GeI3\)2G\.;f
,\',1 CLE.R~SOff\CE/h /COUN'NEWYORK vl
-------+-'1.-----------Matthew D. ~ par, Esq.Attorney for D' endantSafeguard Industrial Equipment Co.McGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, /22=-Hon. Peter H. Moulton ,J
J
324L6717E
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALLA.S. Part 50
------, --,------ ~ (Moulton, f)This Document Relates to:
Index No.: 107404/02, 114328/02
ELSENE A. BARTLETTNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkOciDbd' 2 ,2015
F I LEDOCT 302015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Ag.·~~....;2<..~ NE_WYORKK~k_---
~'''' \<'M\"TLi~ e~Attorney for Plai~tiffs . Attorney for DefendantElsene A. Bartlett Courter & Company, Inc.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.700 Broadway 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10004(212) 558-5500 (212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, /1(r IJPu /I-!J------;>h,e....~T~~--------___J/L=:... / 'l-tton. Peter H. Moulton
,J
,1122-6HI2
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50
______________~~ (Moulton, p.)This Document Relates to:
~ Index No.: 107404/02, 114328/02
ELSENE A. BARTLETT~ NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, Ne~ri LED04DblU' 2 ~Ol~
OCT3Q 2015
....-..............NTY ClERKS OFACE
ADA1\" QArm ;-5C-Attorney for Plaintiffs .Elsene A. BartlettWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
/---')./ / /"' (! .-./
/ /- .l Cl .. C/( '1~~-
Caitlin ~ell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, ~H.MOUltOn,J
1235-5607
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50: (Moulton,~)
----------------~
This Document Relates to:! Index No.: 107404/02,114328/02
ELSENE A. BARTLETT! NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
without costs.
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
F I LEDDated: New York, ~ew York
Uc-tDbv"", ,2015OCT 3\02015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFiCENEW YORK
A~~~-~QK.%~~~----
Attorney for Plaintif-fsElsene A. BartlettWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, /2I-'n. Peter H. Moulton
/o!10!;S7 '7'
J2383-2$SOE
/,/r
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50
_______________~~ (Moulton, f)This Document Relates to:
~ Index No.: 125767/99, 105485/00
HENRY ROBERT LENZ~ NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York F I LED()c±obu:2 ,2015 I
OCT 3'~ 2015
G::LQ-- - COUNTYCLER~~KOFAC,L ,~~':JAJ'V\ cS'D. . Matthew D. Sa ar, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff§ Attorney for~ ndantHenry Robert Lenz Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.700 Broadway 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10004(212)558-5500 (212)509-3456
,j
i
I.3.~~~SH2A~
._--'._"~.-.J
',) ..
.. ;J/J/J6/1s
7 //H~ H. Moulton~SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, .f))
----------------~
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 125767/99,105485/00
HENRY ROBERT LENZNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. F , LEDDated: New York, New York
Q-kb.e.... 2 ,20150(1 3~ LG\5
NTY CLERK'S OFfiCECOU NEWYORK
Kerry~--------Atto~Courter & Company, Inc.MCGNNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
a'&~A1JI\M ~-E-~-}-_ -.---
Attorney for PlaintiffsHenry Robert LenzWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
i
/I!
r - .u22-1Iws3, iL '/
-;,---1
/?""'" Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SO ORDERED,
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
: NYCAL: LA.S. Part 50
_______________~i (Moulton, P)This Document Relates to:
i Index No.: 125767/99, 105485/00
HENRY ROBERT LENZi NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
SO ORDERED, ---:C;;:;7'L2'~,---------_--,-I----'~f-0()/ISHon. Peter H. Moulton
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkCt*be..r 2 ,2015
A:b~v\. QAt-tO-7 5(;lAttorney for Plaintiffs .Henry Robert LenzWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New Yark 10003(212) 558-5500
F' LEDOCT 302015
COUN1Y CLERK'S OFFICE
[{ftC ~I,~:::KCaitlin Bell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, f.)
-:-:------,------------------.c
Index No.: 125767/99, 105485/00
HENRY ROBERT LENZNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkU-fvbef '~, ,2015
FilEDOCT 3'02015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE .,. (),
_ua_~_k_'~'_'l_J2_-JL-'+-/!-H--, N_EWYOR/VvVt~A~AN\ QA-m-~-z;.;. Nicole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for PlaintIffs Attorney for DefendantHenry Robert Lenz Tishman Liquidating Corp.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.700 Broadway 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10004(212) 558-5500 (212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, ~---~JiJUjISHon. Peter H. Moulton
CCT2
2383-26048AH
COURTESY COpy
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
DONALD SPAETH, Individually and asExecutor of, Estate of Jean Spaeth
Index No. 190251110
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. (fonnerly known as Lucent
Technologies Inc.), individually and as successor in interest to Western Electric Company Inc.
for the purposes of the claims asserted herein (hereinafter "Alcatel-Lucent") hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Alcatel-Lucent with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cro~aims against
defendant Aleatel-Lueent be and the same hereby are dismissed witb p~udice and wlnL..€ 0Dated: ~ew~rk. New York OCT 3'
~. _. j;j__ ~ _' 2015 02015~ ~
N-i~Ch""'O'I8S· E. ~nvac~ Esq.:---~- - ~~~~C€L~vy Konigsberg, LLP LOCKE LORD LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendant800 Third Avenue, II th Floor 44 Whippany RoadNew York, NY 10022 Morristown, NJ 07960
SO ORDERED,~ECE~"ED
ocr 2 0 2U15AM 55068505.1
MOTION SUPPORT OFFICENYS 81 lPPi=ME GOLIRT . CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK==========================================XRAMONA LEVY, Individually and as Executrix for theEstate of MARK N. LEVY, Index No. 190005-12
Plaintiffs,- against-
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, asSuccessor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS,COPES-VULCAN, INC., et aI.,
SECONDNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION
Defendants.==========================================X
CYNTHI . MES , ESQ.Hodges Walsh & Mes ~j~PAttorneys for Defendant 'Yo~COPES-VULCAN, INC.55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000
So Ordered:74-------TJ.~S.C. I ojJJj/5
Adam Raffo, Esq. ~Attorneys for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
WHEREFORE, Defendant, COPES-VULCAN, INC. (hereinafter
"COPES-VULCAN") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant, COPES-VULCAN, with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross
claims against defendant, COPES-VULCAN, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains, New YorkC:,c'''bD~r <0, 2015
HON. PETERH. MOlJLTON
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
--------------------xINRE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, p)
--------------------x
MILDRED ORGEK, Individually and as Administratrixfor the Estate of WILLIAM E.ORGEK,
Plaintiffs,
A.C. and S., INC., including, MORSE-DIESELINTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendants,
--------------------x
Index No. 104235/97
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as "Morse-Diesel
International, Inc."), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Morse Diesel,
Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York()e.'du~r ~ ,2015
Justin Weitz, HC17'''-'''
WEITZ & LUXENBEAttorneysfor PlaintiffsMildred Orgek, Individually and asAdministratrixfor the Estate ofWilliam E.Orgek700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, djfu-;;o~n,::"pL.e-te""'r""'J-~L:::M==ou=l=:to=:::n=---=-=
Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for Defendant 1::"../Morse Diesel, Inc, ~
150 Broadway, Suite 600 " ~ ~New York, New York 10038 ()C,r ~/)
(212) 791-0285 Co( . JJI) 'J
/J\;?\, OIS'C
JvZ' /';::9:.VV y. II :\)\ ~
011f.-- v,t::-/.,'\ /C~
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
--------------------x
INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
--------------------x
CATHERINE A. CAIAZZO, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of EDWARD A. CAIAZZO,
Index No. 104036/02119365/99
Plaintiffs,
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et ai.,including, MORSE-DIESEL INTERNAnONAL, INC.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants,
-------------------x
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as '''Morse-Diesel
International, Inc."), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Morse Diesel,
Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
osario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285
, Esq. 0U~\''''WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneys for PlaintiffsCatherine A. Caiazzo, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate ofEdward A. Caiazzo700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
ORDERED, that upon notice~ll co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are IJIt dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, NewYPtk OC)' ~AOC\()b(r ~ ,1~ ,J06 V
l}.c Of.]tV~/A<~Jt,
'1/Y; ;r-~
0Jl-t o~...c:-:
We;'" :lo~
/V J30i 12>I 7
Dated:--~f-"--+--'--=-----
SOORDERED,~----------
tHon. Peter H. Moulton
..~SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 101206/99Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
-against-
A.C. & S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
VINCENT E. PATURZO and JOANNE PATURZO,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
: MOTION AND ORDER AS TO: PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.: ONLY
-----------------------',
------------~,-----------;
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, 11
-z(J)
<zo
WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiff's complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same
Adam Raffo, Esq.Attorney for Plaintif )Vincent E. Paturzo ana Joanne Paturzo,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Jesse Rodg s, Esq.Attorney r DefendantPeerless dustries, Inc.LEWIS RISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, Suite 2100New York, New York 10005(646) 666-76751863.21683
Dated: New York, New York.\j .
prejudice and without costs.
SO ORDERED, ------"L~------'=------:-t:-------------_-_-_-_-_-_-~7-rii)tJ)IS4'ion. Peter JJ Moulton 7· /.
4846-7948-9317.1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NE\V, YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ".
-zen<zo
KENNETH CARBOY AND MARTHA P. CARBOY,
PLAINTIFF(S),
-AGAINST-
A.C. & S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), ET AL.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, .(?)
Index No.: 107007/02,115364/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER AS TOPEERLESS INDUSTRIES, IN.C.ONLY
DEFENDANTS.
WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
10/70)(5r/ -
Adam Raffo, Esq.Attorney for Plaintif sKenneth Carboy and Martha P. CarboyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
~/~H~IIt1oulton
Je e odgers, Esq.rney for Defendant
Peerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
77 Water Street, Suite 2100New York, New York 10005(646) 666-76751863.29390
SO ORDERED,
defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costsF J LEDQ-iZ>ber r;;, dO )S
Dated: New York, New York OCT 302015
1'( CLERK'SNEWYORKOFRC~~L~
----,~=----=----~~:::::::::==----
4843-9237-6357.1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
: NO OPPOSITION[ SUMMARY JUDGMENT: MOTION AND ORDER AS TOi PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.: ONLY,
,,
Defendants.
-against-Plaintiffs,
ANDREW R. NIMMO JR. as Administrator for theEstate of GEORGE L. NIMMO
A.C. and S., INC., et aI.,
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, .f.)
-------------------~,
This Document relates to:j Index No.1 07220/02, 113435/02
-zen-<zo
WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Peerless Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
g~~w'-~Sq Al5i>,N\ ~)\ITb,€~Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Andrew R. Nimmo Jr. as Administrator for theEstate of George L. NimmoWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
302015
Il EDJes, Rodgers,A orney for Defendant
eerless Industries, JQp.,LEWIS BRISBOIS BIS'6)(~f$MfRK~FFIC77 Water Street, Suite 2IOONEW YORK ENew York, New York 10005(646) 666-76751863.22246
costs.
SO ORDERED, -'7"'-~----T7<--""'--------~-1Jb!£"(~.Moulton
4810-7178-16681
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------J(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------J(JOHN LATKOWSHI, as Executor for the Estate of WILLIAMCUMMINS and JOHN LATOWSKI, as Executor for the EstateofNELLI CUMMINS,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.c. & S. INC., et aI.,
Index No.: 122173/1998
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Madina Axelrod, Esq.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------J(WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, A.W. Chesterton Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party. FDated: New York, New York I LED
Odvher 55 I dO J5-- OCT 3 '02015
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, p?eUNTY CLERK'S on:MAL McCAMBRIDGENEW YORK SIl~t;=ER & MAHONEY, LTD.
qg(2v{'FffiftkOrtiz, Esq. A!A~ \(~, ~S~"Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
SO ORDERED, ----;>,L-a;~-=:======:::~:::--Llr7f;S~ Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGAnON---------------------------------------------------------------------------)(BEATRICE FANTAUZZO, Individually and SUZANNETOCZEK as Administratrix for the Estate of CARLFANTAUZZO,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.C. & S. INC., et aI.,
Index No.: 10970812002
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Defendants.---------------------------------------------------------------------------)(
WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, A.W. Chesterton Company, be and t~me are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party. I LeODated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.
OCT 302015
COUNTYCLNEW~6~~OFFICE
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.
(Qb,G)'Fr;ank Ortiz,bA'" 12.A+fO, c:5Q,Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Madina Axelrod, Esq.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022
SO ORDERED, __----r-L:7:---"'~__=__=__=__=__=__=__=_---.f!:.lcJJJolJSHOI}("i?e'ter H. Moulton t-j-'-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIC:JATION
-----------------------------------------------------------------xPETER PACIFICO,
Index No.: 101665/06
P1aintifC-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO, ct. aL
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
LA.S. PaJ1l?f)0Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Defendants.--------------------------------------------------------------x
WHEREFORE, GREENE, TWEED & CO., INC., incorrectly named as "GREENE,
TWEED & CO., LLP, Individually and as· Successor to Palmetto Packings" (hereinafter
"GREENE TWEED') hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant
GREENE TWEED, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, GREENE TWEED, be and the samc are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
YorkE I. LED r
J ~JjJord-a-n-F-OX-++~-f---ll-J~ -~CT 3
01015 ...~JL~~-
BELLUCI COUNTY~LERKIS OFFICE SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGERAttomeys Plaintiff N W YORK & MAHONEY, LTD.546 Fifth Avenue Attorneys for DefendantNew York, New York 10036 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100(212)681-1575 New York, New York 10022
(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED, -- ~ o~~-p~......te-r-l~-{~--M-(-)l-~l-~;-;~--·-·--·-....;.----·----.:..·----10;7715-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------------------xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------xELISE YARCZOWER, as Administratrix for theEstate ofARNOLD YARCZOWER, and ELISEYARCZOWER, Individually,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.C. and S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 102724/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,
BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
\~1 \)~») rS
F ~ lEDJustin WeII25:,::hSi/l.
WEITZ & LU~ ~E~~Jr'~'CLERK'S OFFICEAttorneys for Piamtiff NEW YOIW:700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED, _--,,,--~~ _~oulton
Nicole G. Marko itz, Esq.SEGAL MeCAM RIDGE SINGER &MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-----------------------------------------------------------------------)(This document relates to:
MILDRED ORGEK, Individually and as Administratrixfor the Estate of WILLIAM E. ORGEK
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER-DORR OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.----------------------------------------------------------------------)(
NYCALLA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P>
Index No.: 10423511997
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELERIDORROLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELERIDORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: Q(\(:)\.)( f '), 2015Harrison, New York
WEITZ & LU)(ENBERG, P fC . 015Attorneysfor Plaintiff 0 T 30Z700 BroadwayNew York, NewYor60~CLERK'S OFFICE(212)558-5500 NEW YORK
SO ORDERED:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------)(IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
---------------------------------------------------------------)(ELISE YARCZOWER, Individually and as Index No. 102724/02Proposed Executrix for the Estate of ARNOLD 122138/01YARCZOWER,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------------)(
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York\O} 0701\ r
WEITZ & LU)(ENBERG, P.C.Att eys for Plaintiffs
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompan)) , d Goodyear Can a Inc.
BY:,~l.l.""v~ ~) A /(.../
Lawrence G~ ee, EsqF I LED264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018 OCT 302015(212) 302-2400
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK .
SO ORDERED: 4 ---- 10/:]0)s/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, I.S.C.
· ,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------------------------------------------------------------3CIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION---------------------------------------------------------------3CALICIA CALGIOVANNI, ESQ., as Administratrix: Index No.1 09020/00for the Estate of NICHOLAS A MANGINELLI, 121979/99
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
AC. & S. INC., et al.
Defendants.---------------------------------------------------------------3C
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,lAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yor , New York'(J 03/15"
WEITZ & LU3CENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company andGoodyear can~ Inc 'f: I L EBy: ;;;;f~u,-, ,/. 0
Lawrence G. Lee q. Ocr 302015
264 West 40th Street COUNry CL£R I
New York, New York 10018 N£WyO~~OFFICE(212) 302-2400
SO ORDERED: ~ IV/JojIS./' Hon. Peter H. Moulton, lS.C.
,-I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTYPRESENT: Hon. P.ter H. Moulton, Justice PART .A!l
WEllZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. \;~OMARCH 2014. FIFO
f \ \\ 1.\\'6Plaintiffs rut\ ~ 'S oer~\Cr:..
c\..~~¥:. ~ / a?-Io~ Idooa. vPHILIP R. ANZALONE (deeeP0~-0~~'J'! '{o~ Index. No. 1270&'2&92 .
(Mesothelioma)
RAYMOND BAKER(Lung Cancer)
RICHARD COLTON(Lung Cancer)
JOSEPH CURNYN (dec.)(Lung Cancer)
KARIN DEAN (dec.)(Other Cancer)
FRANK DUFFY (dec.)(Non-Malignancy)
HENRY D. HOLKA(Other Cancer)
JAMES E. MCCABE (dec.)(Other Cancer)
CHRISTIAN MERRILL(Other Cancer)
LYLE V. MOSSOW(Lung Cancer)
WILLIAM NORTON(Lung Cancer)
JOSEPH OLEXA (dec.)(Lung Cancer)
Index. No. 111414/1998
Index. No. 19001212011
Index. No. 190462/2010
Index. No. 101521/2005
Index. No. 107994/1999
Index. No. 114300/2002
Index. No. 113073/2002
Index. No. 11310211998
Index. No. 112280/2002
Index. No. 190134/2011
Index. No. 106209/2001
RICHARD J.• OTTALAGANO JR.(Lung Cancer)
JOHN J. PATTANE(Lung Cancer)
FRANKLIN POTTER(Lung Cancer)
ROBERT S. SABAOASZ (dec.)(Other Cancer)
SEYMOUR SAMUELS(Non-Malignancy)
WILLIAM ANTON STOCKHAUSEN(Lung Cancer)
WILLIAM T. TAYLOR (dec.)(Lung Cancer)
HERMAN VISGER(Lung Cancer)
RAYMOND M. WACHOWICZ (dec.)(Other Cancer)
301::1::10 ~~(Q~ M3N,-,,) &370 ' ,
A.<.NnOO
Index. No. 190018/20..40208 1JO
Index. No. 1901~ 7 I :JIndex. No. 102788/2000
Index. No. 109782/2000
Index. No. 19002412008
Index. No. 190062/2011
Index. No. 190053/2011
Index. No. 19018512011
Index. No. 107135/2000
TRANSFER ORDERPursuant to the direction of Hon. Peter H. Moulton, it Is hereby
ORDERED that the above-named Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. ca$es are being
transferred to Justice Cynthia Kern (lAS Part 55). Counsel are directed to contact
Justice Kern's Clerk at (646) 386-3289.
Dated: October 28,2015 ENTER: ~/~ =:--ETER H. MOULTON, J.S.C.
ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
Check one: DCase Disposed I9"Non-Final Disposition
SUPR.EME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTYPRESENT: Hem. Peter H. Moulton, Justice PART -AQ
WEITZ &LUXENBERG. P.C. ' .. ",.~ \) JUNE 2014 .. FIFO
~ \'<p~ ;:tI\tI ~Plaintiffs ru~\ oj ~sOf(f(\G
c\..~~o~¥-RAPHAEL ARONE (dec.) co\}~'\\~~'1'1 Index. No. 19010712009 v
(Lung Cancer)
CHARLES BAGGIANO, (Lung Cancer)
RALPH N. BORELLI(Lung Cancer)
FLOYD D.BOWDISH(Other Cancer)
CARL T. CARLSEN (dec.)(Lung Cancer)
JAMES WILLIAM CARR (dec.)(Lung Cancer)
DOUG CHAPPLE(Other Cancer)
WILLIAM T. CRUGER(Lung Cancer)
JOHN V. DE FORNE (dec.)(Mesothelioma)
WILLIAM C. ESPOSITO (dec.)(Lung Cancer)
FRANKIE FUGAT (dec.)(Lung Cancer)
RONALD D. HANDZLlK(Lung Cancer)
Index. No. 10038712008
Index. No. 11507511998
Index. No. 11757012002
Index. No. 116747/2007
Index. No. 111089/2002
Index. No. 190007/2009
Index. No. 190237/2011
Index. No. 190023/2012
Index. No. 116291/2004
Index. No. 190137/2009
Index. No. 103506/2002
AUSTIN C. JOERGER (dec.)(Lung Cancer)
WILLIAM E. JOYCE(Other Cancer)
RAYMOND A. MAZZA (dec.)(Other Cancer)
RALPH A. MENENDEZ(Other Cancer)
LEROY G. MITCHELL (dec.)(Non-Malignancy)
PAUL PARADISO(Lung Cancer)
JOHN P. PATTERSON SR. (dec.)(Lung Cancer)
WALTER A. REILLY (dec.)(Lung Cancer)
JOSEPH T. SANDER(Lung Cancer)
ROY F. SCHNETTLER (dec.)(Lung Cancer)
NELSON A. STRAUCH JR.(Lung Cancer)
JOSEPH P. SWIADOWSKY (dec.)(Lung Cancer)
RICHARD WESTON(Lung Cancer)
Index. No. 106973/2008
Index. No. 190172/2009
Index. No. 10091612008
Index. No. 10720812000
Index. No. 19011712012
Index. No. 19031012010
11 S/~d -:r/ doOQ .Index. No. .11i2'jIJ28et
Index. No. 100917/2008
Index. No. 19039112011
Index. No. 10181212008
Index. No. 10567111999
Index. No. 115633/2001
Index. No. 11571212007
TRANSFER ORDERPursuant to the direction of Hon. Peter H. Moulton, it is hereby
ORDERED that the above-named Weitz &Luxenberg, P.C. cases are being
transferred to Justice Cynthia Kern (lAS Part 55). Counsel are directed to contact
Justice Kern'. Clerk at (646) 386..3289.
Dated: 01;10"r28,2015 ENTER:~~<. .. -PETE.R H. MOULTON, J.S.C.ADMJNISTRATIVEJUDfJE
Check ol1e: D Case Disposed ~Non-Final DisposJtion