Upload
truonghanh
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERALEXPORT‐IMPORTBANKoftheUNITEDSTATES
Follow‐upReportonExport‐ImportBank’sEconomicImpactProcedures
September8,2015OIG‐EV‐15‐01
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
The Export‐Import Bank of the United States (“Ex‐Im Bank”) is the official export‐credit agency of the United States. Ex‐Im Bank is an independent, self‐sustaining executive agency and a wholly‐owned US government corporation. Ex‐Im Bank’s mission is to support jobs in the United States by facilitating the export of US goods and services. Ex‐Im Bank provides competitive export financing and ensures a level playing field for US exports in the global marketplace.
The Office of Inspector General, an independent office within Ex‐Im Bank, was statutorily created in 2002 and organized in 2007. The mission of the Ex‐Im Bank Office of Inspector General is to conduct and supervise audits, investigations, inspections, and evaluations related to agency programs and operations; provide leadership and coordination as well as recommend policies that will promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in such programs and operations; and prevent and detect fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the 2012 Quality Standards for Inspection and Evaluation as defined by the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency. This report does not constitute a Government audit and therefore, it was not conducted following the Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (“GAGAS”).
To: DavidSena,SeniorVicePresident&ChiefFinancialOfficer
JamesCruse,SeniorVicePresident,OfficeofPolicy,PlanningandInternationalRelations
From: MarkThorum
AssistantInspectorGeneral,Inspections&Evaluations
Subject: Follow‐upReportonExport‐ImportBank’sEconomicImpactProcedures
Date: September8,2015
AttachedpleasefindthefinalevaluationFollow‐upReportonExport‐ImportBank’sEconomicImpactProcedures.ManagementagreedwiththetworecommendationscontainedinthisReport.Weconsidermanagement’scorrectiveactionstoberesponsive.Therecommendationswillbecloseduponcompletionandverificationoftheimplementationofthoseactions.
Weappreciatethecourtesiesandcooperationextendedtousduringtheevaluation.
cc: FredHochberg,ChairmanandPresidentC.J.Hall,EVPandChiefRiskOfficerMichaelMcCarthy,DeputyInspectorGeneralAngelaFreyre,SVP&GeneralCounselInciTonguch‐Murray,DeputyCFOHeleneWalsh,VPPolicyAnalysisDivisionJenniferFain,DeputyAIGIEParisaSalehi,CounseltotheIG
Attachment:Follow‐upReportonExport‐ImportBank’sEconomicImpactProcedures,OIG‐EV‐15‐01,September8,2015
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
4
WhyWeDidThisEvaluation
Wecompletedafollow‐upreviewinregardtorecommendationsmadetoEx‐ImBankpertainingtoOIG’sSeptember2010evaluationreportontheBank’seconomicimpactprocedures(OIG‐EV‐10‐03).The2010evaluationdeterminedthatEx‐ImBankcouldimproveitseconomicimpactproceduresto(1)betterimplementtheintentofCongressasreflectedintheBank’sCharter,(2)improvetransparency,and(3)maketheprocessmoremanageableforUSexportersandotherparticipantsintheprocess.Theevaluationreportincludedatotaloffourfindingsand16recommendations.
Theobjectiveofthisfollow‐upreviewwastodeterminewhetherEx‐ImBankhadtakenappropriatecorrectiveactionstoaddressthereportedfindingsandrecommendationsmadeintheOIG’sSeptember2010evaluationreport.Duetocongressionalinterest,thereviewalsoevaluatedtheprocessthatEx‐ImBankusedtoreceiveinputfromexternalpartiesindevelopingthenewprocedures.
Ex‐ImBank’sCharterexpiredasofJune30,2015.IntheeventthattheBankweretobereauthorized,werecommendthefollowing:
1. Ex‐ImBankshoulddeviseamethodologytoperiodicallyverify(a)theeffectivenessofitseconomicimpactproceduresandmethodologicalguidelinesinimplementingthecongressionalmandate,and(b)theBankisfollowingthoseproceduresandguidelinesasitprocessesapplications.
2. Ex‐ImBankshouldissueaformalpolicystatementwithrespecttotheengagementofexternalpartiesandtheuseofthenoticeandcommentprocessinestablishingproceduresandguidelines.
EXECUTIVESUMMARY Follow‐upReportEconomicImpactProceduresOIG‐EV‐15‐01,September8,2015
For additional information, contact the Office of Inspector General at (202) 565-3908 or visithttp://www.exim.gov/about/oig.
WhatWeFound
Ex‐ImBankoperatesundervariouscongressionalmandates,whichincludesthestatutoryrequirementtodeterminewhethertheextensionofsupportintheformofadirectloanorfinancialguaranteeforaproposedtransactionwouldadverselyaffecttheUSeconomy.Section2(e)oftheBank’sChartercontainstwostatutoryprohibitionsthatprohibittheBankfromofferingfinancialsupportforUSexportswhoselikelyimpactwouldprovenegativeonUSindustriesandemployment.TheBankthroughitspubliclydisclosedEconomicImpactProceduresandMethodologicalGuidelinesandsupplementalguidanceimplementsthestatutoryrequirementandprohibitionsoftheCharterbytestingproposedtransactionsforadverseeconomicimpact.
WefoundthatEx‐ImBankhadmadesignificantprogressinimplementingtherecommendationsandaddressingtheconcernsidentifiedintheSeptember2010evaluationreport.Specifically,OIGfoundthattheBankhadcompletedcorrectiveactionstoaddressandclose15ofthe16recommendations.Withrespecttotheremainingrecommendationtovalidatetheresultsofitsprioreconomicimpactanalyses,OIGrecognizestheBank’scontinuedeffortstoidentifyafeasibleapproachtocarryoutthisanalysis.OIGalsorecognizestheinherentchallengesofundertakinganempiricalreviewgiventhepurportedlackofdataontherelevanteconomiccharacteristicsthatmakesitdifficulttoestablishthattheapprovedtransactioncausedorcontributedtosubstantialinjurytoUSproducersofanexportablegoodorrelatedemployment.
Nevertheless,OIGbelievesthatEx‐ImBank’seconomicimpactproceduresshouldbeverifiedperiodicallyforeffectivenesstoensurecompliancewiththestatutoryrequirementandtoenableimprovementtotheprocessesforassessingeconomicimpact.Consequently,OIGhasclosedandreformulatedrecommendationB3,withaviewtoallowtheBankmoreflexibilityindevisingamethodologytoverifytheeffectivenessofitseconomicimpactproceduresandmethodologicalguidelinesandensuretheyarebeingfollowed.
Finally,inassessingtheBank’sprocessfordevelopingandpublishingitscurrentproceduresforeconomicimpact,OIGobservedthatwhiletheBankreceivedinputandconsideredtheviewsofmultipleparties,theBankdoesnothaveaformalpolicystatementontheengagementofexternalpartiesandtheuseofthenoticeandcommentprocessinestablishingproceduresandguidance.AformalpolicywouldprovideawrittenframeworkanddirectionforBankstaffwhenengagingexternalpartiesandenhancetransparency.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 7
SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 7
BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 8
Congressional Mandate ............................................................................................................ 8
Economic Impact Procedures and Guidelines .......................................................................... 9
Applications for Bank Support – 2010 to 2014 ....................................................................... 12
Prior Reports on Economic Impact Procedures ...................................................................... 13
RESULTS OF FOLLOW‐UP REVIEW ................................................................................................ 16
I. Evaluation Report on Economic Impact Procedures (OIG‐EV‐10‐03, September 17, 2010) ........................................................................................................ 16
II. Developing and Publishing Economic Impact Procedures .................................................. 22
CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 27
APPENDIXES .................................................................................................................................. 28
Appendix A: Management Response and OIG Evaluation...................................................... 28
Appendix B: Ex‐Im Bank Flow Chart of Non‐Air Economic Impact Process ............................ 32
Appendix C: Ex‐Im Bank Management Responses and Status Updates – 2010 OIG Report ............................................................................................................... 34
Appendix D: Summary of Ex‐Im Bank Corrective Actions to Address Recommendations – 2010 OIG Report ............................................................................. 35
Appendix E: GAO Recommendations and Status – 2007 Report ........................................... 37
Appendix F: References .......................................................................................................... 38
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................. 40
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
6
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
Figure 1: Ex‐Im Bank Flow Chart of Non‐Air Economic Impact Process ....................................... 32
Table 1: Ex‐Im Bank Economic Impact Analysis (“EIA”) ................................................................ 13
Table 2:Summary of Management’s Comments on the Recommendations .............................. 31
Table 3: Management Responses and Status Updates ................................................................ 34
Table 4: Summary of Corrective Actions ...................................................................................... 35
Table 5: GAO Recommendations and Status ................................................................................ 37
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
7
INTRODUCTION
Wecompletedafollow‐upreviewregardingtherecommendationsmadetotheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStates(“Ex‐ImBank”or“Bank”)intheOfficeofInspectorGeneral’s(“OIG”)evaluationreportontheBank’seconomicimpactproceduresissuedonSeptember17,2010.1Weinitiatedthereviewaspartofourannualworkplan.
Theobjectiveofthefollow‐upreviewwastodeterminewhetherEx‐ImBankhadtakenappropriateactionstoaddressthereportedfindingsandrecommendationsmadeintheOIG’sSeptember2010evaluationreport.Thereviewwasnotmeanttobeanevaluationoftheissuesraisedinthepreviousreport,butrathertoreviewandassesswhethertheBank’smanagementactionsinresponsetothe16recommendationshavebeenimplemented.Duetocongressionalinterest,thereviewalsoevaluatedtheprocessthatEx‐ImBankusedtoreceiveinputfromexternalpartiesindevelopingthenewprocedures.
SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY
Toachieveourobjective,wereviewedtheBank’sEconomicImpactProceduresandMethodologicalGuidelines,effectiveApril1,2013,2Proposal[for]EconomicImpactProceduresandMethodologicalGuidelines,datedSeptember27,2012,andEconomicImpactProcedures,effectiveApril2007.TheOIGalsoreviewedtheOIG’sSeptember2010EvaluationReportRelatingtoEconomicImpactProceduresandEx‐ImBank’sannualcompetitivenessreportsforcalendaryears2010to2014.WereviewedapplicablelawsandregulationssuchasTheCharteroftheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStatesanditsenablinglegislation,theExport‐ImportBankReauthorizationActof2012.3,4WeinterviewedmanagementandstafffromEx‐ImBank’sOfficeofPolicy,PlanningandInternationalRelations(“PolicyandPlanningGroup”or“PPG”)togainanunderstandingoftheBank’seffortstoaddressthe16recommendationscontainedintheevaluationreport.WeinterviewedstafffromPPGandtheOfficeofGeneralCounseltogainanunderstandingoftheBank’sprocessesfordevelopingandpublishingthecurrenteconomicimpactprocedures.Wediscussedthestatusofouropenrecommendationsandthefollow‐upreviewwithGAO.WeobservedtheBank’seconomicimpactanalysisprocessbyattendingawalk‐throughoftheprocessprovidedbyPPGstaff.Wealsoreviewedvarioussupporting
1SeeEx‐ImBankOIG’sEvaluationReportRelatingtoEconomicImpactProcedures(OIG‐EV‐10‐03,datedSeptember17,2010)report,availableforinspectionathttp://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files//oig/reports/EIB_Report_Final_Complete_Web‐pdf‐uploaded‐via‐Bulk‐Upload‐at‐ts‐2012‐07‐17‐15‐40‐50.pdf.
2FormoreinformationonEx‐ImBank’sEconomicImpactProceduresandMethodologicalGuidelines,seehttp://www.exim.gov/policies/economic‐impact.
3SeeTheCharteroftheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStatesathttp://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files//newsreleases/Updated_2012_EXIM_Charter_August_2012_Final.pdf.
4SeeExport‐ImportBankReauthorizationActof2012athttp://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW‐112publ122/pdf/PLAW‐112publ122.pdf.Pub.L.No.112‐122,126Stat.357(2012).
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
8
documentationtodeterminethemeasurestakenbyEx‐ImBankmanagementtoimplementthe16recommendations.WeperformedourreviewatEx‐ImBank’smainlocationinWashington,DC.
Weconductedthefollow‐upreviewinaccordancewiththeQualityStandardsforInspectionandEvaluationissuedbytheCounciloftheInspectorsGeneralonIntegrityandEfficiency.5ThestandardsrequiretheEx‐ImBankOIG,asappropriate,tofollow‐upandensurerecommendationsmadetotheBankareadequatelyconsideredandagreed‐oncorrectiveactionsarefullyandproperlyimplemented.
BACKGROUND
Establishedin1934throughExecutiveOrder,andsubsequentlymadeanindependentagencyoftheUnitedStates(“US”)throughcongressionalCharterin1945,theEx‐ImBankisawholly‐ownedgovernmentcorporationwhosefundamentalmissionistoaidinthefinancingandtofacilitatetheexportofUSgoodsandservices,andtocontributetotheemploymentofUSworkers.Ex‐ImBank’sCharter,throughitsenablinglegislation,establishestheBank’soperationsandprogramsandisreauthorizedonaperiodicbasis.TheBank’scorefinancingprogramsincludedirectloansandguaranteestoforeignbuyers,exportcreditinsuranceforexportersandforeignbuyers,andworkingcapitalfinancetoUSsmallbusinessexporters.Ex‐ImBank’sCharterexpiredonJune30,2015.6FollowingalapseintheCharter,Section7authorizestheBanktoperformcertainfunctionsincluding“anyofitsfunctionssubsequenttosuchdateforthepurposesofanorderlyliquidation.”7
Congressional Mandate
Ex‐ImBankoperatesundervariouscongressionalmandates,whichincludethestatutoryrequirementtodeterminewhethertheextensionofBanksupportintheformofadirectcreditorfinancialguaranteeforaproposedtransactionwouldadverselyaffecttheUSeconomy.8TherequirementsforthiseconomicimpactdeterminationareoutlinedinSection2(e)ofEx‐ImBank’sCharterandprohibittheBankfromofferingfinancialsupportforUSexportswhoselikelyimpactwouldprovenegativeonUSindustriesoremployment.Ex‐ImBankistheonlyexportcreditagencyworldwidewithalegislatedmandateto
5FormoreinformationontheQualityStandardsforInspectionandEvaluation,seehttps://www.ignet.gov/sites/default/files/files/iestds12.pdf.
6Pub.L.No.113‐164,128Stat.1874(2014).
712USC§635f.Charter,supranote3at62.
8ThestatutoryrequirementforeconomicimpactanalysiswasaddedbyCongresstoEx‐ImBank’sCharterin1968andhasbeensubsequentlymodifiedthroughthecongressionalreauthorizationprocess[12USC§635(b)(1)(B)(ii);Pub.L.No.90‐267,82Stat.47.(1968)].TheBank’srequirementtoconsidertheadverseeffectsofloansandguaranteesonUSindustryandjobsiscodifiedattitle12USC§§635(b)(1)(B)(ii),635a‐2.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
9
conductaneconomicimpactanalysisasameansofdeterminingthepotentialadverseeffectofprovidingsupportfortheexportofacapitalgoodorservice.9
TherearetwostatutoryprohibitionsspecifiedinSection2(e)oftheCharterthatprohibitEx‐ImBankfromextendingfinancialsupportforatransaction.ForthefirststatutoryprohibitionunderSection2(e)(1)toapply,therearetwoconditionsthathavetobemetasdeterminedbytheBank.10Thefirstconditionisthat“thecommodityislikelytobeinsurplusontheworldmarketsatthetimetheresultingcommoditywillfirstbesold,[i.e.,termedstructuraloversupply];ortheresultingproductioncapacityisexpectedtocompetewithUSproductionofthesame,similar,orcompetingcommodity,[i.e.,termedtradeflowimpact].”Thesecondconditionisthatthetransaction“willcausesubstantialinjurytoUSproducersofthesame,similar,orcompetingcommodity.”AccordingtoSection2(e)4,substantialinjurycanoccuriftheextensionofBankfinancialsupportfortheexportofagoodorserviceresultsintheestablishmentoforincreaseinproductionequaltoorinexcessofonepercentofUSproduction.11ThefirststatutoryprohibitionmaybedisregardediftheexceptionunderSection2(e)3applies,whereby“inthejudgmentoftheBoard…theshort‐andlong‐termbenefitstoindustryandemploymentintheUSarelikelytooutweightheshort‐andlong‐terminjurytoUSproducersandemploymentofthesame,similar,orcompetingcommodity.”12
InregardtothesecondprohibitionofSection2(e)oftheCharter,Ex‐ImBankisprohibitedunderSection2(e)(2)fromextendingfinancialsupportif“theresultingproductionofsubstantiallythesameproduct”issubjecttoaspecifiedtrademeasureorpreliminaryaction(e.g.,anti‐dumpingorderand/orcountervailingduty),unlessthetransactionapplicantdemonstrates“extraordinaryharm”totheexporterand/orUSeconomy.13TheBoard’sapplicationofthisexceptiontothesecondstatutoryprohibitionissubjecttopublicnoticeandcommentintheFederalRegister.
Economic Impact Procedures and Guidelines
AlthoughEx‐ImBank’sCharterdoesnotprovideanexplicitmethodologyforeconomicimpactdeterminations,theBankisrequiredtoimplementregulationsandprocedurestominimizethepotentialadverseeffectofBanksupportonUSindustries.14Assuch,theBank’sPolicyandPlanningGroup(“PPG”)staffimplementthestatutoryrequirementandprohibitionsofSection2(e)oftheCharterthroughthepubliclydisclosedproceduresfor
9SeetheReporttotheUSCongressontheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStatesandGlobalExportCreditCompetition for the Period January 1, 2013 throughDecember 31, 2013 (dated June 2014) at http://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files/newsreleases/US-Ex-Im-Bank-2012-Competitiveness-Report-to-Congress-Complete.pdf.
10Charter,supranote3at39.
11Charter,supranote3at41.
12Charter,supranote3at40‐41.
13Charter,supranote3at39‐40.
14Title12USC§635a‐2.Charter,supranote3at91.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
10
economicimpactandsupplementalguidance.TheprocedureswerelastupdatedpursuanttotheExport‐ImportBankReauthorizationActof2012(“ReauthorizationAct”),whichrequiredtheBankto“developandmakepubliclyavailablemethodologicalguidelinestobeusedbytheBankinconductingeconomicimpactanalysesorsimilarstudies”within180daysofenactment.15
The2012ReauthorizationActalsorequiredEx‐ImBankto(1)maintainsupportingdocumentationforitseconomicimpactanalysesandsimilarstudiesconsistentwiththeGAO’sStandardsforInternalControloftheFederalGovernment,16and(2)reportontheimplementationofrecommendationsinGAO’sSeptember2007evaluationreportontheBank’seconomicimpactanalysisprocess.17TherevisedEconomicImpactProceduresandMethodologicalGuidelines(“ProceduresandGuidelines”)wereapprovedbytheBank’sBoardonNovember19,2012,andbecameeffectiveApril1,2013.18
Purpose for Procedures and Guidelines
Intestingproposedtransactionsforadverseeconomicimpact,thepurposeoftheBank’sProceduresandGuidelinesareasfollows:
(1) Toensurethatalltransactionsarescreenedforeconomicimpactimplications;
(2) ToidentifythosetransactionsthataresubjecttoapplicabletrademeasuresorthatposeasignificantriskofpotentialsubstantialinjurytotheUSeconomy;and
(3) Toputonlythosecasesthatmeetthestandardsthroughamoreextensiveeconomicimpactanalyticalprocessthatisfair,consistent,andpubliclytransparent.19
TheBank’seconomicimpactproceduresarecomprisedoftwosections,Section1:EconomicImpactApplicabilityandSection2:MethodologicalGuidelines.Adiscussionofeachsectionandtheattendantmethodologyfollowbelow.
Section 1: Economic Impact Applicability
Section1consistsoffivestages,ofwhichthefirstthreestagesaredesignedtodeterminewhethertheassociatedexport(a)isanexportablegoodorservice(Stage1),(b)willresultintheproductionofagoodsubjecttoatrademeasure(Stage2),and(c)willestablishorexpandforeignproductioncapacityofanexportablegood(Stage3).20Asaproposedtransactionproceedsthroughthefirstthreestagesitcanbeeffectively“screened‐out”fromanalysis.Thismeansfurthereconomicimpactanalysisoftheproposedtransactionisnot
15Pub.L.No.112‐122,126Stat.357(2012).
16Formoreinformation,seehttp://www.gao.gov/assets/80/76455.pdf.
17SeeGAO’sExport‐ImportBank:ImprovementsNeededinAssessmentofEconomicImpact(GAO‐07‐1071,datedSeptember12,2007)report,availableforinspectionathttp://www.gao.gov/products/GAO‐07‐1071.
18ProceduresandGuidelines,supranote2.
19ProceduresandGuidelines,supranote2at2.
20ProceduresandGuidelines,supranote2at2‐7.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
11
required(e.g.,theexportdoesnotenabletheforeignbuyertoproduceanexportablegoodorservice)orthatEx‐ImBanksupportforthetransactionisprohibited(i.e.,theexportablegoodissubjecttoaspecifiedtrademeasure).UnderStage4,transactionsaredividedintooneofthreecategoriesforfurtheranalysisunderStage5.
CategoryA:Transactionsnotsubjecttospecifiedtradeordersorpreliminarytradeactions.
CategoryB:Transactionssubjecttospecifiedtradeorders. CategoryC:Transactionssubjecttospecifiedpreliminarytradeactions.
Stage5consistsofaseriesofcategoryspecificscreensandisdesignedtoidentifytransactionsinwhichthepotentialadverseimpactisprobableandthereforeadetailedeconomicimpactanalysisconductedbyPPGstaffiswarranted.
Section 2: Methodological Guidelines
Section2ofEx‐ImBank’seconomicimpactproceduresdescribethesetofassumptionsandanalysesappliedbyPPGstaffforthosetransactionswarrantingadetailedeconomicimpactanalysis.21RefertoAppendixAofthisReportforaFlowchartoftheNon‐AirEconomicImpactPolicyoftheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStates.22InresponsetoadverseimpactconcernsvoicedbytheairlineindustryandinarelatedlawsuitabouttheBank’sapprovaloffinancialcommitmentsforforeignairlines,23PPGstaffdevelopedspecificscreeningproceduresandamethodologytobeappliedinanalyzingaircrafttransactions,AttachmentA:EconomicImpactforServices,Aircraft,oftheBank’sProceduresandGuidelines.24AccordingtoPPGstaff,themajorrevisionstotheeconomicimpactproceduresweretheadditionofSection2:MethodologicalGuidelinesandtheaforementionedAttachmentA.Otherchangestotheproceduresincludeddefiningthepurposeofsubjectingtransactionstoeconomicimpactpursuanttothecongressionalmandate,“codifyingprinciples”concerninginformationrequiredbytheBanktoperformadetailedeconomicimpactanalysis,anddefiningtechnicalterms(e.g.,“watchfuleye”and“structuraloversupply”).
Undertheframeworkdescribedabove,theBank’sPPGstaffreviewsalltransactionsforpotentialadverseeconomicimpact.Theevidencereviewedincludesprojectspecific
21ProceduresandGuidelines,supranote2at7‐12.
22TheflowchartwascreatedbyPPGstaffforinternalpurposesandisusedasatrainingtoolfornewemployees.
23TheplaintiffsinthereferencedlawsuitallegedthatEx‐ImBankviolatedtheSection2(e)requirementtoconsidertheadverseeffectandprohibitionsoftheCharterwhenitapprovedfinancialcommitmentstoaforeignairlinein2011.Theplaintiff’salsodisagreedwiththeBank’s“screening”(i.e.,exclusion)ofthecommitmentsfromdetailedeconomicimpactanalysisandclaimedthecommitments“causedthemcompetitiveinjury.”Formoreinformationseehttps://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi‐bin/show_public_doc?2011cv2024‐55andhttp://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate‐courts/cadc/12‐5294/12‐5294‐2013‐06‐18.html,andtheBank’sresponsesonremandfromtheUSCourtofAppealsathttp://www.exim.gov/about/official‐notices‐and‐public‐comments.
24ProceduresandGuidelines,supranote2at13‐15.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
12
information(e.g.,newforeignproductionandcompetition)andglobalindustry‐specificinformation(e.g.,industrystudiesandhistoricaldata).ApplicantsarealsoaffordedtheopportunitytosubmitasupplementaltradeflowanalysisforBoardconsideration.Ex‐ImBankhasdevelopedsupplementalguidanceforapplicantsinregardtoinformationneededanditsusebytheBanktoconductadetailedeconomicimpactanalysisfortransactionsthatfacilitate(1)foreignproductionofanexportablegood,25or(2)foreignpassengeraircraftservices.26
TheresultsofPPG’seconomicimpactanalysisaredocumentedinamemorandum.ThememorandumandsupportingevidenceareprovidedtoEx‐ImBank’sBoardofDirectorswhoisresponsibleformakingthefinaldecisionastowhetheratransactionwillorwillnotproceedthroughtheloanoriginationprocessandreceiveEx‐ImBanksupport.IftheBankdeterminesthatatransactionmeetsthelegislativespecifiedprohibitions,theneconomicimpactcanbethebasisfordenialofsupport.Conversely,theBoardcanexercisetheSection2(e)exceptionstothestatutoryprohibitions(e.g.,thebenefitstoUSindustryandemploymentoutweighthecosts)andapproveatransactionforsupportasmentionedpreviously.
Applications for Bank Support – 2010 to 2014
From2010to2014,Ex‐ImBank“actedon”atotalof1,429medium‐andlong‐termtransactions.ThismeanstheBank“authorized,deniedorwithdrew”thosetransactions.27Ofthe1,429transactions,PPGstaffreviewed557transactions(39.0percent)foreconomicimpactbecausethetransactioninvolvedanexportablecapitalgoodorservice(i.e.,Stage1).Throughfurtherscreeningatotalof34transactions(2.4percent)weresubjectedtoadetailedeconomicimpactanalysis(i.e.,Stages2through5).Atotalof27ofthe34casesyieldedanetpositiveeconomicimpactfindingandweresubsequentlyapprovedbyEx‐ImBank’sBoard.TheremainingsevencaseswerewithdrawnfromfurtherconsiderationforBanksupport.Forexample,anexporterwithdrewitsapplicationbecauseitdidnotwanttopursuetheexceptiontotheprohibitionunderSection2(e)(2)oftheCharter.Table1belowprovidessummarydataonapplicationsforBanksupportforcalendarsyears2010to2014.28
25Formoreinformation,seehttp://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files//Information‐Needed‐to‐Conduct‐a‐Detailed‐Economic‐Impact‐Analysis‐Goods%5B1%5D.pdf.
26Formoreinformationseehttp://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files//Information‐Needed‐to‐Conduct‐a‐Detailed‐Economic‐Impact‐Aircraft‐Passenger‐Services%5B1%5D.pdf.
27Formoreinformation,seetherespectivecompetitivenessreportathttp://www.exim.gov/news/reports/competitiveness‐reports.
28Summarydataoncommercialpassengeraircrafttransactionsisreportedinparenthesis.Forexample,27casesinvolvingcommercialpassengeraircraftwereaffectedbytheeconomicimpactmandatein2014.Priortothe2013ProceduresandGuidelines,transactionsinvolvinganincreaseinforeignserviceswerescreenedfromfurthereconomicimpactanalysis.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
13
Table 1: Ex‐Im Bank Economic Impact Analysis (“EIA”) Calendar Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total “Acted On” Medium‐ and Long‐Term Transactions
336 344 278 255(32) 216(27) 1,429(59)
Total Cases Directly Affected by Economic Impact Mandate
118 135 98 103(17) 103(27) 557(44)
Cases Subject to Detailed EIA
8 2 10 8(0) 6(1) 34(1)
Cases Subject to Detailed EIA Approved by the Board
7 2 7 7(0) 4(1) 27(1)
Source: Ex‐Im Bank’s Report to the US Congress on the Export‐Import Bank and Global Export Credit Competition for calendar years 2010 to 2014, http://www.exim.gov/news/reports/competitiveness‐reports
Prior Reports on Economic Impact Procedures
Ex‐ImBank’sstatutorymandatetoconsidertheadverseeffectofitssupportonproposedtransactionshasbeenthesubjectofcongressionalandpublicinterestsinceitsintroductionin1968.Witheachsubsequentreauthorization,theBank’srequirementtoconsiderthepotentialadverseeffectofprovidingsupportfortheexportofagoodorservicehasbeenmodifiedatotalofninetimes.Accordingly,boththeGeneralAccountabilityOffice(“GAO”)andtheEx‐ImBankOIGhaveconductedreviewsoftheBank’seconomicimpactprocessesandidentifiedopportunitiesforimprovement.
GAO Report (GAO‐07‐1071)
OnSeptember12,2007,GAOissueditsreportentitled,Export‐ImportBank:ImprovementsNeededinAssessmentofEconomicImpact.29Pursuanttoacongressionalrequest,GAOreviewedEx‐ImBank’s:(1)overallpoliciesandproceduresfordeterminingeconomicimpact;(2)theextenttowhichtheproceduresprovidefortheidentificationandappropriateanalysisofapplicationsthatcouldpotentiallycauseadverseeconomicimpact;and(3)theextenttowhichitspolicies,procedures,anddecisionsaretransparenttointerestedandaffectedparties.
GAOdeterminedthatEx‐ImBankhasproceduresthatidentifyproposedtransactionswiththe“greatestpotentialtoadverselyaffectUSindustry”andrequireadetailedeconomicimpactanalysisofthosetransactions.ThereportalsoacknowledgedchallengesandareasforimprovementintheBank’sscreeninganddetailedanalysisoftransactionsforeconomicanalysisandlimitationsinthetransparencyoftheeconomicimpactprocess.GAOmadeatotalofsixrecommendationstoimprove(1)theBank’sidentificationandanalysisofapplicationsforeconomicimpactand(2)thepublictransparencyoftheeconomicimpactprocessforinterestedandaffectedparties.AsofthedateofthisReport,allsixoftherecommendationsmadebyGAOareclosed.SeeAppendixEofthisReportforthesixrecommendations.
29Supranote17.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
14
Ex‐Im Bank OIG Report (OIG‐EV‐10‐03)
OnSeptember17,2010,Ex‐ImBankOIGissueditsreportentitled,EvaluationReportRelatingtoEconomicImpactProcedures.30ThereviewwasinitiatedbytheOIGasacontinuationofaspecialprojectcompletedbytheOIGinNovember2007.InConferenceReport109‐265,datedNovember2,2005,theOIGwasdirectedtoprovideawrittenanalysisofloanguaranteesprovidedbytheBankforanethanoldehydrationplantinTrinidadandTobago(“TrinidadProject”).31,32CongresswantedtoknowiftheBank“mettheconditions”ofSection2(e)(4)oftheCharterintestingtheproposedtransactionforsubstantialinjuryandtoreportontheusageof“valueadded”bytheBankinthattesting.33OIGwasalsodirectedtomakerecommendationsastotheappropriatenessof“valueadded”inmakingdeterminationswithrespecttoSection2(e)4oftheCharter.
OnNovember5,2007,theOIGissuedaletterresponsetotheHouseCommitteeonFinancialServicesthatconcluded(1)theTrinidadProjectmettheconditionsofSection2(e)4oftheCharterandotherrelatedprovisions,(2)the“valueadded”methodologyisnotroutinelyusedbytheBanktodeterminewhetherornotaproposedtransactionmeetsthestatutorytestofSection2(e)(4),and(3)theuseofthe“valueadded”methodologywithrespecttotheTrinidadProjectasexpressedintheBank’sJanuary2005reporttotheCongresswasnotappropriate.34TheOIGadvisedtheHouseCommitteeonFinancialServicesthatitwouldcontinueitsreviewoftheBank’seconomicimpactprocedurestofurtheraddresstheconceptualbasisofthe“valueadded”methodology,issuesidentifiedintheGAO’sSeptember2007report,andothermattersidentifiedbytheOIGintheanalysisoftheTrinidadProject.
TheobjectivesoftheOIG’s2010evaluationofEx‐ImBank’seconomicimpactprocedureswereto(1)independentlyevaluatetheBank’seconomicimpactproceduresaswellascritiquesandsuggestionsfortheirimprovementdeliveredbyGAO,membersoftheBank’sBoardofDirectorsandmanagement,transactionparticipants,CongressandotherUSgovernmentagencieshavingaroleintheeconomicimpactreviewprocess;and(2)identifyopportunitiestoimprovetheefficiencyandeffectivenessoftheeconomicimpactprocedureswithintheconstraintsofexistingstatutoryrequirements,therequirementsoftransactionproponents,andtheresourcesavailabletoEx‐ImBank.
30Supranote1.
31Formoreinformation,seehttp://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CRPT‐109hrpt265/pdf/CRPT‐109hrpt265.pdf.
32CongressauthorizedtheEx‐ImBankOIGin2002(Pub.L.No.107‐189),amendingtheInspectorGeneralActof1978.TheOIGcommencedoperationsinAugust2007.
33TheConsolidatedAppropriationsActof2005(Pub.L.No.108‐447)requiredEx‐ImBanktosubmitareporttoCongresson(1)theeconomicimpactofBanksupportfortheTrinidadProjectonUSproducersofethanoland(2)whethertheextensionofsupportwouldresultinsubstantialinjurytothoseproducerspursuanttoSection2(e)(4).TheBankappliedthe“valueadded”methodologyinanalyzingtheeconomicimpactoftheTrinidadProject.
34AppendixGoftheOIG’sSeptember2010evaluationreportincludesthelettertotheHouseCommitteeonFinancialServices.Ex‐ImBankOIG,supranote1atG‐1toG‐14.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
15
TheevaluationdeterminedthatEx‐ImBankcouldimproveitseconomicimpactproceduresto(1)betterimplementtheintentofCongressasreflectedintheBank’sCharter,(2)improvetransparency,and(3)maketheprocessmoremanageableforUSexportersandotherparticipantsintheprocess,includingtheBoardofDirectors,Congress,USgovernmentagenciesthatreviewtheBank’sactionsinthisareaandobserversinrelevantUSindustries.Specifically,16recommendationsforcorrectiveactionweremadefortheBankto:
BettersupporttheBoard’scongressionallymandatedroleindecidingeconomicimpactcases(FindingA),
GuidetheBoardandstaffindecidingeconomicimpactcases(FindingB), ImprovethetransparencyoftheBank’seconomicimpactproceduresandrelated
determinations(FindingC),and ImprovetheefficiencyandresponsivenessoftheBank’seconomicimpact
proceduresbysimplifyingtheprocessandreallocatingresources(FindingD).
OnSeptember10,2010,Ex‐ImBankmanagementprovideditsresponsetothedraftevaluationreportandagreedthatthe“currenteconomicimpactprocedures(includingmethodology)shouldbeimproved,includingenhancedtransparencyandconsistencyacrossanalyses.”TheBankrefrainedfromprovidingplannedcorrectiveactionstoaddressthefindingsandrelatedrecommendationsnotingthat“anysignificantadjustments”totheeconomicimpactprocedureswouldcoincidewiththe2011congressionalreauthorizationoftheCharter.Ex‐ImBankindicatedthatitwouldconsiderthefindingsandrecommendationsofboththe2007GAOandthe2010OIGreportsaspartofits“fullreviewandlikelyoverhaul”ofitsprocedures.Ex‐ImBank’smanagementresponsesandstatusupdatestoOIG’s2010evaluationreportareincludedinAppendixC.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
16
RESULTS OF FOLLOW‐UP REVIEW
I. Evaluation Report on Economic Impact Procedures (OIG‐EV‐10‐03, September 17, 2010)
Finding A: Improve economic procedures and reports to better support the Board’s congressionally mandated role in deciding economic impact cases.
Inthe2010evaluationreport,Ex‐ImBankOIGconcludedthattheBoard’sabilitytodecideeconomicimpactcasesbetween2002and2009hadbeenimpairedbytheeconomicimpactanalysisreportsusedbytheBoardaspartofthedecision‐makingprocess.
ToaddressthepotentialimpairmenttotheBoard’sdecisionalprocessforeconomicimpactcases,theOIGmadethreerecommendations:
A1.ThePPGstaff’seconomicimpactreportsshouldpresenttheavailablequantitativeandqualitativeinformationobtainedbythePPGstaffthatismaterialandrelevanttothedeterminationofeconomicimpactinaconcisebalancingformatthataddresseseachoftheelementsoftheeconomicimpactcontemplatedbytheCharterandwhichwillsupporttheBoard’sdecisionalprocessundersection2(e)(3)oftheCharter.
A2.Economicimpactreports, supplementedbytheBank’spubliclyavailableeconomicimpactprocedures,shouldbewrittentoreasonablyinformthereaderofthelimitationsandqualificationsofthedata,assumptions,estimates,methodsandanalysisrelieduponbythePPGstaffandthesensitivityoftheconclusionsexpressedbythePPGstafftopossiblechangesinassumptionsorestimatesthatcanbereasonablyanticipated.ThePPGstaffshouldconsiderguidanceprovidedbytheOfficeofManagementandBudget(OMB)indevelopingspecificationsforitsanalysisandreportstotheBoard.
A3.RelianceontradeflowanalysisoranyotherquantitativemethodsusedbythePPGstaffthateffectivelydecideeconomicimpactcasesshouldbemadesubjecttoBoardapprovalandsubsequentperiodicreaffirmation.
Assessment of Corrective Actions ‐ Recommendations A1 to A3
Basedonourassessment,Ex‐ImBanktookadequatecorrectiveactionstosatisfactorilyaddressthethreerecommendationsmadeintheOIG’s2010evaluationreport.OnNovember19,2012,theBoardapprovedtheBank’srevisedEconomicImpactProceduresandMethodologicalGuidelines,effectiveApril1,2013.TheApril2013ProceduresandGuidelines,supplementalguidance,andrelatedmemorandareflectthischangeinmethodology.AppendixDofthisReportcontainsasummaryoftheBank’scorrectiveactions.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
17
TheOIGhasclosedrecommendationsA1,A2,andA3basedonourassessmentoftheBank’scorrectiveactions.
Finding B: Develop improved criteria to guide the Board and staff in deciding economic impact cases.
Inthe2010evaluationreport,Ex‐ImBankOIGconcludedthatrelianceonquantitative“tradeflow”analysistoguidethePPGstaff’srecommendationforapprovalordisapprovalofeconomicimpactcasesbytheBoardwasresponsibleformuchofthecriticismoftheeconomicimpactprocessbytheBoardofDirectorsandtheReviewingAgencies.35Andthattradeflowanalysis,asappliedduringtheperiodaddressedinthe2010evaluationreport,appearedtobeinconsistentwiththerequirementsoftheBank’sCharter.
ToaddressconcernsinregardtotheBank’srelianceonandapplicationof“tradeflow”analysisindecidingeconomicimpactcases,theOIGmadefourrecommendations:
B1.WhilethedatasupportingtradeflowanalysisandtheconclusionsthatmaybedrawnfromthatdataandanalysishaverelevancetotheBoard’sconsiderationanddeterminationofeconomicimpactcases,tradeflowanalysisshouldnotbethesoleorprimarycriterionfordecidingeconomicimpactcasesaddressedinthePPGstaff’seconomicimpactreports,anditshouldnotbedeterminativeofthePPGstaff’srecommendation,ortheBoard’sdecision,ineconomicimpactcases.
B2.ThePPGstaffshoulddevelopadditionalcriteriaforanalysisofeconomicimpactthatareconsistentwiththeBank’sCharterandcongressionalintenttoassisttheBoardindecidingeconomicimpactcases.ThesecriteriashouldfocusonthesortofmacroeconomictrendsthatwerecharacteristicoftheUSindustriesthatwerecitedasexperiencingsubstantialeconomicinjuryatthehandsofforeigncompetitorsincongressionalhearingsprecedingtheenactmentofthecurrenteconomicimpactrequirementsexpressedinSection2(e)oftheBank’sCharter.
B3.ItissuggestedthattheBank’sEconomicImpactProceduresprovideforaperiodicbackwardlookingempiricalreviewtodeterminewhetheritappearsthattransactionsapprovedhaveinfactcausedorcontributedtoanysubstantialinjurytoUSproducersofanExportableGoodorrelatedemploymentunderthecriteriarelieduponbythePPGstaffandtheBoard,andwhetheranyprojectedbenefitstotheUSeconomyandemploymentofapproving,ordisapproving,specifictransactionswereinfactrealized.
35TheReviewingAgenciesincludetheDepartmentsofCommerce,StateandtheTreasury,USTradeRepresentativeandtheOfficeofManagementandBudget.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
18
B4.ItissuggestedthatinviewofthesuggestionsaboveatA1,2,and3andB1and2,thePPGstaffshouldreevaluatethe“sensitivecommercialsectorslist”promulgatedbytheBankpursuanttoSection2(e)(5)oftheCharter.Inparticular,itissuggestedthattheBankfurtherrefineoromitreferenceto“ProductsassociatedwithprojectswhereasignificantportionoftheoutputdirectlyproducedbytheprojectisdestinedfortheUSmarketandwillcompetedirectlywithUSproduction,”whichisbasedon“likelynetnegativetradeflowimplication.”ItisalsosuggestedthattheBoardbeconsultedbeforethesensitivesectorlistispublishedtoconfirmthattheyareingeneralaccordwithitinordertoavoidtheBank’sPresidenteffectivelymisrepresenting,andtherebyusurping,theBoard’sfinalauthoritytodecideeconomicimpactcases.
Assessment of Corrective Actions – Recommendations B1, B2 and B4
Basedonourassessment,Ex‐ImBanktookadequatecorrectiveactionstosatisfactorilyaddressrecommendationsB1andB2.TheApril2013ProceduresandGuidelines,supplementalguidance,andrelatedmemorandareflectthischangeinmethodology.AsforrecommendationB4,weareclosingtherecommendationbasedontheBank’sresponseandclarificationsprovided.36AppendixDofthisReportcontainsasummaryoftheBank’scorrectiveactions.
TheOIGhasclosedrecommendationsB1,B2andB4basedonourassessmentoftheBank’scorrectiveactions.
Assessment of Corrective Actions – Recommendation B3
InregardtorecommendationB3,OIGrecognizesEx‐ImBank’scontinuedeffortstoidentifyanapproachtoretrospectivelyassessthevalidityofkeyassumptionsappliedwhenconductinganeconomicimpactanalysis(seeAppendixD,June2014StatusUpdate).Duringmeetingstodiscussthestatusoftherecommendation,PPGstaffexpressedtheirongoingconcerntotheOIGabouttheusefulnessandfeasibilityoftherecommendationgiventhelackofinformationto“lookback”andreviewatransaction.Further,asexplainedbyPPGstafftheprocessforadetailedanalysisofaproposedtransaction“isnotatechnicalevaluationofthelikelyimpact.”Rather,theBank’smethodologicalprocessentails“ahypotheticalscenarioofapotentialworstcaseimpact.”AccordingtoPPGstaff,“Whenatransactionposesathreatofasubstantialinjury,theBank’seconomicimpactmethodologyappliesassumptionsthatyieldanextremeworsecaseoutcome.Forexample,oneoftheassumptionsisthatdisplacedUSproductioncannotbesoldtoanybuyeratanyprice.Hence,performing‘backward’lookinganalysestoverifytheresultsofahypotheticalanalysisthatisnotintendedtopredictthelikelyimpactwouldnotinformfutureanalyses.”
36OIGnotesthatEx‐ImBank’sApril2013ProceduresandGuidelinespostedontheBank’swebsiteathttp://www.exim.gov/policies/economic‐impactcontainalinktotheBank’sSensitiveSectorList.Seealsohttp://www.exim.gov/policies/economic‐impact/sensitive‐commercial‐sectors.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
19
IntheFebruary2013statusupdate,theBankcommentedontheaimofthemandateforeconomicimpact“tocapturetheprevailingpoliticalsentimentandtechnicalconsiderationsatthetimetheBankauthorizesuniquelydefinedtransactions,[andthat]checkingtheaccuracyofpreviousassumptionsonpasttransactionswouldnotlikelyinformsuchissues.”TheBankstatedfurther“thereisnopractical(ifany)waytoactuallylookbackanddeterminethevalidityofkeyanalyticalassumptions(e.g.,wereUSproducersdisplacedbyproductsfromtheEx‐ImBank‐supportedforeignproject?).”
AlthoughOIGdoesnotexpressanopinionontheavailabilityofdata,weunderstandEx‐ImBank’sconcernswithrespecttotheavailabilityofdataoneconomiccharacteristicsandthechallengeofdistinguishingbetweenchangesineconomicimpactattributabletotherespectivetransactionfromchangesattributabletootherexternalfactors(e.g.policiesandcustomsoftheforeigngovernment)thatarenotwithintheBank’spurview.Aspreviouslynoted,theBank’sdetailedanalysisofeconomicimpactispredicatedonaworstcasescenarioversusapredictionofalikelyscenario.TheOIG’s2010evaluationreportrecognizedsimilardifficultiesinachievingtheobjectiveofaneconomicimpactanalysissuchaslimitationsindata,timeandresources.37TheselimitationsmakeitdifficultinthecontextofanempiricalreviewtoestablishthattheapprovedtransactioncausedorcontributedtosubstantialinjurytoUSproducersofanexportablegoodorrelatedemployment.
Nevertheless,OIGbelievesthatEx‐ImBankshouldperiodicallyvalidateitsproceduresandguidelinesforeconomicimpactdeterminationsandrelatedanalyses.AsprescribedinOMBCircularA‐123Revised,Management’sResponsibilityforInternalControl,Ex‐ImBankmanagementhasa“fundamentalresponsibilitytodevelopandmaintaineffectiveinternalcontrol.”38InternalcontrolisaprocesseffectedbyEx‐ImBank’sBoardofDirectorsandmanagement,designedtoprovidereasonableassuranceabouttheachievementoftheBank’smissionandobjectivesinregardtoeffectivenessandefficiencyofoperations,reliabilityoffinancialreporting,andcompliancewithlawsandregulations.AsstatedintheGAO’sStandardsforInternalControlintheFederalGovernment,“controlactivitiesarethepolicies,procedures,techniques,andmechanismsthatenforcemanagement’sdirectives.”39BoththeOMBCircularandGAOstandardsprescribeseparateandongoingevaluationsofinternalcontrolactivitiesaspartofmonitoringbyfederalagencies.
WithrespecttoEx‐ImBank,CongresshasdirectedtheBanktodeterminewhethertheextensionofsupportintheformofadirectcreditorfinancialguaranteeforaproposed
37Inthe2010evaluationreport,OIGconcluded:“Whiletheobjectiveofeconomicimpactreviewcanbestatedsimply,itisdifficultinpracticetoachieveduetolimitationsindata,timeandresources,theneedtorelyonpotentiallyconflictingdataandopinionsregardingfuturerelationshipsofsupply,demand,pricesandtermsofinternationaltradeinchangingmarkets,andthepotentiallyconflictinginterestsofdifferentsegmentsoftheUSeconomy.”Ex‐ImBankOIG,supranote1ati.
38Formoreinformationseehttp://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a123_rev.
39GAO,supranote16.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
20
transactionwouldadverselyaffectUSindustryandemployment.40Accordingly,theBankhasimplementedproceduresandmethodologicalguidelinesforitseconomicimpactdeterminationstoensureBankpersonnelcarryoutouttheanalyticalprocessinaccordancewiththecongressionalmandate.ControlactivitiessuchasthoseestablishedbyEx‐ImBankforeconomicimpactshouldbeverifiedperiodicallytoensurecompliancewiththestatutoryrequirement,andtoenableimprovementtotheprocessesforassessingeconomicimpact.TheresultsofthisverificationarenotonlyimportantforBankmanagementtoknowtheeffectivenessofthecontrolactivity,butalsotoestablishcreditabilityoftheanalyticalprocessappliedandkeyassumptionsmadeandtoinformfuturedecisionsastotheevolutionoftheeconomicimpactrequirement.Asmentionedpreviously,Ex‐ImBank’seconomicimpactrequirementhasbeensubjecttoninemodificationssinceitsadditiontotheCharterin1968.
Consequently,OIGclosedandreformulatedrecommendationB3intoanewrecommendationwithinthisReporttoreflecttheaboveconsiderations.WereformulatedtherecommendationwithaviewtoallowtheBankmoreflexibilityindevisingamethodologytoverifytheeffectivenessofitseconomicimpactproceduresandmethodologicalguidelinesandtoensurethoseproceduresandguidelinesarebeingfollowedbytheBankasitprocessesapplications.
TheOIGclosedandreformulatedrecommendationB3,andissuedanewrecommendationinthisReport.
RECOMMENDATION 1
Ex‐ImBank’sreauthorizationexpiredasofJune30,2015.IntheeventthattheBankweretobereauthorized,werecommendthefollowing:
ToensurecompliancewiththecongressionalmandateandtoenableimprovementstoEx‐ImBank’sprocessesforassessingproposedtransactionsforadverseeconomicimpact,OIGrecommendsthattheBankdeviseamethodologytoperiodicallyverify(a)theeffectivenessofitseconomicimpactproceduresandmethodologicalguidelinesinimplementingthecongressionalmandate,and(b)theBankisfollowingthoseproceduresandguidelinesasitprocessesapplications.
Management Response:
PleaseseeAppendixA,ManagementResponseandOIGEvaluation.
40Section2(b)(1)(B)oftheBank’sCharterrequiresthat,“theBoardofDirectorsshalltakeintoaccountanyseriousadverseeffectofsuchloanorguaranteeonthecompetitivepositionofUnitedStatesindustry…andemployment….”Charter,supranote3at12‐13.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
21
Finding C: The Bank should improve the transparency of its economic impact procedures and its economic impact determinations.
Inthe2010evaluationreport,Ex‐ImBankOIGconcludedthattheresultsofeconomicimpactreviewswereexpressedinrelativelybriefwrittenreportspreparedbytheBank’sPPGstaffandinminutesofmeetingsoftheBoardofDirectors,noneofwhicharepubliclydisclosedorthereaftereasilyaccessiblebytheBank’sBoardandmanagement.ThePPGstaff’sinternalproceduresforproducingeconomicimpactreportsrelytoasignificantextentonthePPGstaff’sexperienceandpracticeinproducingprioreconomicimpactreportsandarenotthoroughlydocumented.
ToaddressconcernsinregardtothetransparencyoftheBank’seconomicimpactproceduresandrelateddeterminations,theOIGmadethreerecommendations:
C1.RevisingtheeconomicimpactprocedurestoincludemoreinformationaboutthePPGstaff’smethodologyandpublishingtheexpandeddescriptionontheBank’swebsite.
C2.RevisingtheBank’sinternalprocedurestomorefullyandaccuratelydescribethePPGstaff’smethodologyinpreparingeconomicimpactreports.
C3.Makingeconomicimpactreportspubliclyavailableafterredactingthem,ordelayingtheirrelease,toprotectsensitivebusinessconfidentialinformationofthetransactionproponents.
Assessment of Corrective Actions – Recommendations C1 to C3
Basedonourassessment,Ex‐ImBanktookadequatecorrectiveactionstosatisfactorilyaddressrecommendationsC1,C2andC3.TheApril2013ProceduresandGuidelines,supplementalguidance,andrelatedmemorandareflectthischangeinmethodology.AppendixDofthisReportcontainsasummaryoftheBank’scorrectiveactions.
TheOIGhasclosedrecommendationsC1,C2andC3basedonourassessmentoftheBank’scorrectiveactions.
Finding D: The Bank should improve the efficiency and responsiveness of the economic impact procedures by simplifying the process and reallocating resources.
Inthe2010evaluationreport,Ex‐ImBankOIGconcludedthatotherUSgovernmentagenciesthatevaluatetheimpactontheUSeconomyofspecifiedtransactionsordevelopmentsapplyanumberofstrategiestoadvancethegoalsofachievingtransparency,reasonablyaccuratedeterminationsandresponsivenesstotheinterestsofthepublic,transactionparticipantsandotherstakeholdersthathavenotbeenfullyevaluatedorappliedinthecontextofEx‐ImBank’seconomicimpactprocedures.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
22
ToaddressconcernsinregardtotheefficiencyandresponsivenessoftheBank’seconomicimpactprocedures,theOIGmadesixrecommendations:
D1.Developingandmakingpublicamethodologytoidentifyatanearlystagetransactionswherethereappearstobelittleriskofadverseeconomicimpactinordertoallowexpeditedhandlingofthosecases.
D2.Requestingexportersofcapitalequipmenttoproviderelevantdatathatisreasonableavailabletothem,withoutundueburden,duringtheapplicationprocesstosupportanacceleratedreviewbythePPGstaff.
D3.Inviting(butnotrequiring)proponentsoftransactionssubjecttoformaleconomicimpactreviewtosubmitwhitepaperanalysesaddressingeconomicimpactconcernsthatmightberaisedbythetransaction.
D4.ProvidingearliernoticetoCongressandtheReviewingAgenciesoftheinitiationofasubstantiveeconomicimpactreview,afteraninitialscreeningreviewbutbeforePPGstaffhaspreparedacompleteeconomicimpactreport.
D5.ProvidingearliernoticetoCongressandtheReviewingAgenciesoftheinitiationofasubstantiveeconomicimpactreview,afteraninitialscreeningreviewbutbeforePPGstaffhaspreparedacompleteeconomicimpactreport.
D6.Hiring,orcontractingfortheservicesof,atrainedeconomistwithabackgroundinmacroeconomicmarketanalysisofthesortrequiredbyeconomicimpactreviewtoassistinimplementingtheimprovementssuggestedinthisreport.
Assessment of Corrective Actions – Recommendations D1 to D6
Basedonourassessment,Ex‐ImBanktookadequatecorrectiveactionstosatisfactorilyaddressandcloserecommendationsD1toD6.TheApril2013ProceduresandGuidelines,supplementalguidance,andrelatedmemorandareflectthischangeinmethodology.AppendixDofthisReportcontainsasummaryoftheBank’scorrectiveactions.
TheOIGhasclosedrecommendationsD1toD6basedonourassessmentoftheBank’scorrectiveactions.
II. Developing and Publishing Economic Impact Procedures
Ex‐ImBank’seconomicimpactprocedureshavebeenthesubjectofscrutinybyCongressandbyaffectedexternalparties,particularlyinrelationtofinancingofwide‐bodyaircraft.USairlines,particularlyDeltaAirLines(“Delta”),havepursuedlitigationchallengingtheBank’sapplicationofeconomicimpactprocedures,andaUSproducerofwide‐bodyaircraft,Boeing,isaffectedbyeconomicimpactproceduresappliedtoaircrafttransactions.PublishedreportsinMarch2015statedthatEx‐ImBankandBoeinghadcommunicatedregardingdevelopmentofeconomicimpactprocedures
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
23
relatedtoaircraftfinancing,promptingcongressionalconcerns.41Toaddresstheseconcerns,ourreviewalsoevaluatedtheprocessthatEx‐ImBankusedtoreceiveinputfromexternalpartiesindevelopingthenewprocedures.
Ex‐ImBank’sproceduresforeconomicimpactwerelastupdatedpursuanttothe2012ReauthorizationAct,whichrequiredtheBankto“developandmakepubliclyavailablemethodologicalguidelinestobeusedbytheBankinconductingeconomicimpactanalysesorsimilarstudies”within180daysofenactment.42TheAct,however,didnotrequireEx‐ImBanktoamendtheproceduresforeconomicimpactineffectsince2007.TheBankwasonlyrequiredbytheActtomakeitsmethodologyforconductingdetailedeconomicimpactanalysespubliclyavailable.
Inadditiontopublishingthemethodologyasrequiredbythe2012reauthorization,theBankalsodevelopedadditionalprocedurestoaddressadverseimpactconcernsvoicedbytheairlineindustryandinarelatedlawsuitabouttheBank’sapprovaloffinancialcommitmentsforforeignairlines.43Ex‐ImBankdevelopedspecificscreeningproceduresandamethodologytobeappliedinanalyzingaircrafttransactions,AttachmentA:EconomicImpactforServices,Aircraft(“AttachmentA”).44Underthepriorproceduresforeconomicimpact,transactionsinvolvingtheexportofagoodorservicethatwouldresultinanincreaseinaforeignservicewasremoved(i.e.,screened)fromfurthereconomicimpactanalysis.45AccordingtoPPGstaff,themajorrevisionstotheeconomicimpactproceduresweretheadditionofSection2:MethodologicalGuidelinesandtheaforementionedAttachmentA.TherevisedProceduresandGuidelinesforeconomicimpactwereapprovedbytheBank’sBoardonNovember19,2012,andbecameeffectiveonApril1,2013.
Inrevisingtheproceduresforeconomicimpact,Ex‐ImBankreceivedinputandconsideredtheviewsofmultipleparties,includingtherecommendationsfromGAOandEx‐ImBankOIG,seniormanagement,apanelofexpertsininternationaltrade,exportsand/oreconomics,otherUSgovernmentagenciesinvolvedininternationalmonetaryandfinancialpoliciesandtheReviewAgencies(“USgovernmentagencies”).46Indevelopingthescreeningproceduresandmethodologyforaircrafttransactions,Ex‐ImBankconsideredtheviewsofDeltaobtainedthroughcorrespondenceandtheongoinglitigation.TheBankalsosoughtinputandinformationfromBoeingasdisclosedinanarticleinTheWallStreetJournal(“WSJ”),BoeingHelpedCraftOwnLoanRule,published
41Forexample,seehttp://www.wsj.com/articles/boeing‐helped‐craft‐own‐loan‐rule‐1426203934.
42Seesupranote15.
43Seesupranote23.
44ProceduresandGuidelines,supranote2at13‐15.
45TheBankdecidedthattransactionsinvolvingservicesectors,suchasaircraft,whereinterestedpartieshavepresentedconcernsofpotentialadverseimpacttotheBankshouldbesubjecttofurtherreviewforeconomicimpact.
46Seesupranote35.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
24
onMarch12,2015.47ThroughaFreedomofInformationActrequesttoEx‐ImBank,theWSJobtainedcopiesofemailsexchangedbetweentheBankandBoeingin2012concerningtheproposedProceduresandGuidelinesforeconomicimpact.AccordingtoBankstaff,astheonlywide‐bodyaircraftmanufacturerintheUS,Boeingwascontactedtoobtainpertinentdataandinformationaboutthemanufacturingandsalesoftheseaircraft(e.g.,deliveries,routeplans,andelasticityofdemandbysector)foruseindevelopingtheproceduresandmethodologyoutlinedinAttachmentA.
Althoughnotrequired,theBanksolicitedpubliccommentsontheProposedEconomicProceduresandMethodologicalGuidelinesthroughtheFederalRegisteronSeptember27,2012,andinapartiallyopenmeetingoftheBoardofDirectorsonNovember19,2012.48TheproposedProceduresandGuidelineswerealsoaccessibletothepublicontheBank’swebsite.
OIGnotesthattheAdministrativeProcedureAct’s(“APA”)informal(“noticeandcomment”)rulemakingrequirementsdidnotapplytotheBank’sdevelopmentoftheseprocedures.49Title12USC§§635(e)(7)(F)and635a‐2excludetheBankfromthenoticeandcommentrequirementsof“subchapterIIofchapter5oftitle5”(i.e.,APA)fordevelopmentofeconomicimpactprocedures.Under§635(e)(7)(B)(i)and(iii)(I),noticeandcommentintheFederalRegisterisonlyrequiredbystatuteif(1)theBank“intends”toconductadetailedeconomicimpactanalysisofaproposedtransactionor(2)thereisa“materialchange”toanapplicationwherenoticehasbeenprovidedbytheBankofitsintentiontoconductadetailedeconomicimpactanalysis.50BankstaffconfirmedthatAPA’snoticeandcommentrequirementsdonotapplywithrespecttodevelopingproceduresforeconomicimpact.However,thenoticeandcommentprocessprovidestheBankwithasystematicapproachtoobtainpublicinputandvetparticipants’interests,andprovidesforasubstantiverecordforanalysis.Bankstaffexplainedhadtheynotprovidedfornoticeandcomment,theBankwouldhavebeensubjecttomorequestionsandcomplaints.
InresponsetotheFederalRegisternotice,Ex‐ImBankreceivedcommentsfromexternalparties,includingindividualandjointsubmissionsfromtradeassociationsrepresentingvariousUSindustries(e.g.,aviation,aerospace,manufacturing,ironandsteel,nuclear,andsatellite),internationaltransactionbankingandprivatesectorbusinessenterprises.Publiccommentswerealsoreceivedfrompubliclytraded
47Seesupranote41.
48Formoreinformation,seehttp://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR‐2012‐09‐27/pdf/2012‐23866.pdfandhttp://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR‐2012‐11‐09/pdf/2012‐27421.pdf.
49Title5USCSubchapterII;Pub.L.No.79‐404,60Stat.237(1946).
50TheUnitedStatesDistrictCourtfortheDistrictofColumbiahasheldinmultiplecasesinvolvingtheBankandtheairlineindustrythattheAPArulemakingrequirementsdonotapplytothedevelopmentofeconomicimpactprocedures.Forexample,seehttps://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi‐bin/show_public_doc?2011cv2024‐55andhttps://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi‐bin/show_public_doc?2013cv0192‐54.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
25
corporations(e.g.,BoeingandDelta),51aprivatelyheldcompany,amemberofCongress,tradeunions(e.g.,InternationalAssociationofMachinistsandAerospaceWorkers),andadvocacygroupsrepresentingUSbusinessesandexporters(e.g.,USChamberofCommerce).TofacilitatethereviewprocessofthecommentsreceivedontheproposedProceduresandGuidelines,Ex‐ImBankengagedapanelofexpertsininternationaltrade,exportsand/oreconomics.ThethreeexpertsengagedbytheBankwereresponsibleforreviewingandprovidingcommentsontheproposedProceduresandGuidelinesandpubliccommentsreceivedinresponsetothenoticeintheFederalRegisterandfromUSgovernmentagencies.
InreviewingthecommentsreceivedontheBank’sproposedProceduresandGuidelines,OIGnotesthegeneralconsensuswassupportiveoftheBank’seffortstoprovidegreatertransparencyandclaritytoitsproceduresforeconomicimpact.Eventhoughanumberofcommentersquestionedtheextensionoftheprocedurestoaircrafttransactions,theyalsoprovidedrecommendationstoimprovetheProceduresandGuidelines,includingAttachmentA.Forexample,commentersdisagreedontheBank’sproposed$200millionthresholdfordeterminingwhetheranaircrafttransaction(i.e.,termed“evaluatedtransaction”)warrantsfurthereconomicimpactreview.Onecommenter,Boeing,notedthatthethresholdistoolow,whileanothercommenter,Delta,saidthethresholdistoohigh.AlthoughEx‐ImBankretainedthe$200millionthresholdforaircrafttransactions,theBankdefinedwhatconstitutesan“evaluatedtransaction”withrespecttothethresholdanddescribedhowthesubstantialinjurytest(i.e.,onepercent)ismetinthefinalProceduresandGuidelines.52
AdditionalchangestotheProceduresandGuidelinesbasedontheBank’sconsiderationofcommentsreceivedincludedclarifyingthesetofassumptionsandanalysesappliedinSection2:MethodologicalGuidelines.Forexample,theBankclarifiedtherequirementforsubmissionofinformationbyapplicantsforuseinthestructuraloversupplyandtradeflowanalysesforlargetransactionsversussmalltransactionsandnotedthatitwouldincludetheexistenceofcompetitionfromotherECAsintheBank’seconomicimpactanalysesforBoardreference.53TheBankalsoreducedtheproposedthresholdwhenproportionalityappliesfrom20to10percentfortransactionsinwhichtheBank’sfinancingis“deminimus”54andclarifiedtheproceduresforconductinga“costanalysis”foralltransactionsundertradeflowanalysis.55
ThefactthattheBankreceivedinputfromandhadcommunicationswithexternalpartiesduringthedevelopmentofthenewprocedures,priortopublicationoftheproposedproceduresandformalsolicitationofcomments,maycreateanappearanceof
51OIGnotesthatDelta’scommentsweresubmittedjointlywiththeAirlinePilotsAssociation,International.
52ProceduresandGuidelines,supranote2at13‐14.
53ProceduresandGuidelines,supranote2at8and9.
54ThatistheBank’sfinancingrepresents10percentorlessofthetotalprojectcostforaproposedtransaction.
55ProceduresandGuidelines,supranote2at9and10.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
26
preferentialtreatmentforcertainexternalparties.OIGobservedthatEx‐ImBankdoesnothaveaformalpolicyforcommunicatingwithandobtaininginformationfromexternalparties.Althoughnotrequiredbystatute,Ex‐ImBankdidprovideforanoticeandcommentperiodwithrespecttotheproposedProceduresandGuidelinesforeconomicimpact.However,theBankstaffhadadditionalcommunicationswithBoeingoutsidethisframeworkasevidencedbythee‐mailcorrespondence,andcraftedtheproceduresinresponsetoconcernsraisedbyDelta.
BasedonourreviewofdocumentsandinterviewswithBankstaff,theOIGdidnotfindevidencethatBoeingoranyotheroutsidepartyexercisedundueinfluencewithrespecttotheformulationofthescreeningproceduresandmethodologyforanalyzingaircrafttransactions.Ex‐ImBankstaffconfirmedthattheyconsideredtheinputreceivedfromseveraloutsidepartiesindevelopingtheProceduresandGuidelinesforeconomicimpact.Further,theynotedthatthefinalpoliciesthatwereadopteddidnotincludecertainchangesproposedbyBoeing.Forexample,aBankstaffmembercitedBoeing’scommentthattheBankshouldnotimplementtheeconomicimpactproceduresforaircrafttransactionsasitwasnotacongressionalrequirement.TheBankdidnotagreewithBoeing’scommentastheproceduresandmethodologytobeappliedinanalyzingaircrafttransactionswereapprovedandimplemented.Conversely,initsfinalpolicy,theBankchangedhowitdetermineswhetherthesubstantialinjurytestforaircrafttransactionsismetbasedoncommentsreceivedfromDeltathat“mosttransactionswouldfailtheproposed1%test”andtherefore,notbesubjecttoadetailedeconomicimpactanalysis.Ex‐ImBankrevisedthedenominatorinthemetricusedforcalculatingthethresholdtodistinguishbetweenwide‐bodyandnarrow‐bodyaircraft.Bydoingso,theBankloweredthethresholdfortransactionstoqualifyfordetailedanalysis.Further,themetricusedtocalculatesubstantialinjurywasincludedinthefinalpolicy.
AlthoughourreviewoftheprocessfindsthatEx‐ImBankconsideredinputfromarangeofsourcesindevelopingitsrevisedProceduresandGuidelinesforeconomicimpact,includingapublicnoticeandcommentprocess,OIGalsofindsthatimportantinputwasreceivedthroughinformalmethodsthatwerenotcapturedinthepublicrecord,andthepublicnoticeandcommentprocesswasinitiatedatthediscretionoftheBank.Intheinterestofgreatertransparencyandclarity,Ex‐ImBankshouldissueaformalpolicystatementwithrespecttotheengagementofexternalpartiesandtheuseofthenoticeandcommentprocessinestablishingproceduresandguidance.AformalpolicywouldprovideawrittenframeworkanddirectionforBankstaffwhenengagingexternalpartiesandenhancetransparency.ThispolicystatementwouldnotnecessarilybindtheBanktoproceedthroughnoticeandcommentforanyparticularactionthatisexplicitlyexemptbytheCharterorthroughstatute.
RECOMMENDATION 2
Ex‐ImBank’sreauthorizationexpiredasofJune30,2015.IntheeventthattheBankweretobereauthorized,werecommendthefollowing:
Intheinterestofgreatertransparencyandclarity,Ex‐ImBankshouldissueaformalpolicystatementwithrespecttotheengagementofexternalpartiesandtheuseofthenoticeandcommentprocessinestablishingproceduresandguidelines.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
27
Management Response:
PleaseseeAppendixA,ManagementResponseandOIGEvaluation.
CONCLUSION
Ex‐ImBankhasmadesignificantprogressinimplementingtherecommendationsandaddressingtheconcernsidentifiedintheOIG’sSeptember2010EvaluationReportRelatingtoEconomicImpactProcedures.Specifically,wefoundthattheBankhadcompletedcorrectiveactionstoaddressandclose15ofthe16recommendations.However,Ex‐ImBankhadyettoaddressrecommendationB3whichsuggestedthattheBankprovideaperiodicempiricalreviewtovalidatetheresultsofitseconomicimpactanalyses.
OIGrecognizesEx‐ImBank’scontinuedeffortstoaddresstherecommendation.WealsorecognizetheinherentchallengesinundertakinganempiricalreviewgiventhepurportedlackoftimeseriesdataontherelevanteconomiccharacteristicsthatmakesitdifficulttoestablishthattheapprovedtransactioncausedorcontributedtosubstantialinjurytoUSproducersofanexportablegoodorrelatedemployment.Nevertheless,OIGbelievesthatEx‐ImBank’seconomicimpactproceduresshouldbeverifiedperiodicallytoensurecompliancewiththestatutoryrequirementandtoenableimprovementtotheprocessesforassessingeconomicimpact.Therefore,OIGclosedandreformulatedrecommendationB3withaviewtoallowtheBankmoreflexibilityindevisingamethodologytoverifytheeffectivenessofitseconomicimpactproceduresandmethodologicalguidelinesandensurethoseproceduresandguidelinesarebeingfollowedbytheBankasitprocessesapplications.
InassessingtheBank’sprocessfordevelopingandpublishingthecurrentproceduresforeconomicimpact,OIGobservedthattheBankdoesnothaveaformalpolicystatementontheengagementofexternalpartiesandtheuseofthenoticeandcommentprocessinestablishingproceduresandguidance.AformalpolicywouldprovideawrittenframeworkanddirectionforBankstaffwhenengagingexternalpartiesandenhancetransparency.
Finally,Ex‐ImBank’sCharterexpiredasofJune30,2015.OIGrecognizesthatimplementationoftherecommendationsinthisReportissubjecttoreauthorization.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
28
APPENDIXES
Appendix A: Management Response and OIG Evaluation
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
29
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
30
OIG Evaluation
OnAugust31,2015,Ex‐ImBankprovideditsmanagementresponsetoadraftofthisReport,agreeingwiththetworecommendations.TheresponseidentifiedtheBank’sactionstoaddresstherecommendation.OIGconsiderstheBank’sactionssufficienttoresolvethereportedrecommendations,whichwillremainopenuntilOIGdeterminesthattheagreeduponcorrectiveactionsarecompletedandresponsivetothereportedrecommendations.TheBank’smanagementresponsetothereportedrecommendationsandOIG’sassessmentoftheresponseareasfollows:
RECOMMENDATION 1
Recommendation 1: ToensurecompliancewiththecongressionalmandateandtoenableimprovementstoEx‐ImBank’sprocessesforassessingproposedtransactionsforadverseeconomicimpact,OIGrecommendsthattheBankdeviseamethodologytoperiodicallyverify(a)theeffectivenessofitseconomicimpactproceduresandmethodologicalguidelinesinimplementingthecongressionalmandate,and(b)theBankisfollowingthoseproceduresandguidelinesasitprocessesapplications.
Management Response:Ex‐ImBankconcurswiththeOIGrecommendation.Ex‐ImBank’sreauthorizationexpiredasofJune30,2015.IntheeventthattheBankweretobereauthorized,weagreetothefollowing.Inresponse,theBankwillexplorethefeasibilityofdevisingamethodologytoperiodicallyverifytheeffectivenessofandadherencetotheBank’sEconomicImpactProceduresandMethodologicalGuidelines(EIProcedures).Thedevisedmethodologywillbeconstructedwithaviewtoensurethattheproceduresadequatelyandtransparentlycomplywiththestatutoryrequirement,aswellasfacilitatepossibleimprovementsintheBank’sprocesseswithrespecttoimplementationoftheEIProcedures.
Evaluation of Management’s Response:Management’sactionsareresponsive;therefore,therecommendationisresolvedandwillbecloseduponcompletionandverificationthattheactionshavebeenimplemented.
RECOMMENDATION 2
Recommendation 2: Intheinterestofgreatertransparencyandclarity,Ex‐ImBankshouldissueaformalpolicystatementwithrespecttotheengagementofexternalpartiesandtheuseofthenoticeandcommentprocessinestablishingproceduresandguidelines.
Management Response:Ex‐ImBankconcurswiththeOIGrecommendation.Ex‐ImBank’sreauthorizationexpiredasofJune30,2015.IntheeventthattheBankweretobereauthorized,weagreethattheBankshallissueaformalpolicystatementwithrespecttoengagementofrelevantexternalpartiesandtheuseofthenoticeandcommentprocessinestablishingproceduresandguidelinesrelatedtotheeconomicimpactofBanktransactions.Indevelopingsuchastatement,theBankwillseektomaximizetransparencyandstakeholderinputinthedevelopmentofproceduresandguidelinesthatinfluenceEx‐ImBankrequirementsregardingeconomicimpact.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
31
Evaluation of Management’s Response:Management’sactionsareresponsive;therefore,therecommendationisresolvedandwillbecloseduponcompletionandverificationthattheactionshavebeenimplemented.
Table 2: Summary of Management’s Comments on the Recommendations
Rec. No.
Corrective Action: Taken or Planned56
Expected Completion
Date57
Resolved: Yes or No58
Open or Closed59
1. TheBankwillidentifyoptionstoperiodicallyverifytheeffectivenessofitsEIproceduresandguidelinesforadherencetothoseprocedures.TherecommendedcourseofactionistobepresentedtotheBank’sExecutiveWorkingGroup(“EWG”)andthenimplemented.
06/17/2016 Yes Open
2. TheBankwillidentifyoptionsforissuingapolicystatementwithrespecttotheengagementofexternalpartiesandtheuseofthenoticeandcommentprocessinestablishingEIproceduresandguidelines.TherecommendedcourseofactionistobepresentedtotheEWGandthenimplemented.
07/29/2016 Yes Open
56Ex‐ImBankprovidedanimplementationplanwithdetailedcorrectiveactionsandtargetcompletiondatestoadraftofthisReport.
57Ex‐ImBankOIGhasrequestedtargetcompletiondatesforeachoftheoutstandingrecommendations.
58“Resolved”meansthat(1)Managementconcurswiththerecommendation,andtheplanned,ongoingandcompletedcorrectiveactionisconsistentwiththerecommendation;or(2)Managementdoesnotconcurwiththerecommendation,butalternateactionmeetstheintentoftherecommendation.
59UpondeterminationbyEx‐ImBankOIGthattheagreeduponcorrectiveactionhasbeencompletedandisresponsivetotherecommendation,therecommendationcanbeclosed.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
32
Appendix B: Ex‐Im Bank Flow Chart of Non‐Air Economic Impact Process
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
33
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
34
Appendix C: Ex‐Im Bank Management Responses and Status Updates – 2010 OIG Report
Table 3: Management Responses and Status Updates
Date Details September 10, 2010
ManagementResponse:Ex‐Im Bank’smanagementagreed“itscurrenteconomicimpactprocedures(includingmethodology)shouldbeimproved,includingenhancedtransparencyandconsistencyacrossanalyses.”However,Bankmanagementdecidedthatanyrevisiontoitsprocedureswouldcoincidewiththe2011congressionalreauthorizationprocessoftheBank’sCharter.TheBankplannedto“initiateafullreviewandlikelyoverhaul”ofitsprocedures,consideringthe2007GAOand2010OIGreportedfindingsandrecommendations.
July 5, 2011 StatusUpdate:TheBankadvisedthatithadestablishedatimeframeforacomprehensivereviewoftheeconomicimpactprocedures.TheBankreaffirmeditsplantoconsidertheGAOandOIGreports.ThereviewwouldalsoconsidertheBank’sownassessmentoftheproceduresforeconomicimpactsince2001.TheBankplannedtostartthereviewinJuly2011andcompletethereviewbytheendofthecalendaryear.
September 18, 2012
StatusUpdate:TheBankadvisedthatacomprehensivereviewoftheeconomicimpactprocedureshadcommenced.Thereviewprocesswouldincludeinputfromthepublic,otherUSagenciesandindependentconsultantswithbackgroundsinpublicpolicyandinternationaltradeissues.
February 12 and 15, 2013
ManagementResponse:TheBank’sresponse cited fourkeythemesbasedonitsinterpretationofthe2010OIGevaluationreport:1. TheOIGviewstheeconomicimpactmandateasrequiringtheBanktosupport
oneUSfirm/sectoroveranother.Assuch,thesedecisionsneedtobemadeatthepoliticallevelwithinEx‐ImBank(thatis,attheBoardofDirectorslevel).Economicimpact‐relateddecisionsarefundamentalconsiderationsofrelativenationalbenefit.
2. TheOIGbelievestheBankhasinappropriatelytakenthedecisionalrolefromtheEx‐ImBankBoardofDirectors(Board)byusinganalyticalapproachesthateffectivelydecidetheoutcome.AccordingtotheOIGreport,suchstaffpractices“usurpthedecisionalrolethatCongressintendedtheBoardtoexercise.”
3. TheOIGbelievesthatEconomicimpactanalysesshould:(a)bemoreobjective;and(b)providemoreperspectivefromawidersetofinterestedpartiessothattheBoardhasthebenefitofthisinformationinitsdecisionmakingcapacity.
4. TheOIGisconcernedthatthecurrentprocesslackstransparencywithrespecttoboth:(a)methodology;and(b)resultsoftheanalyticalprocess.
Withtheexceptionofthemetwo,theBankagreedwiththeconcernsoutlinedinthe2010evaluationreportandincorporatedanumberoftheOIG’ssuggestionsinitsrevisedeconomicimpactprocedures.TheBankrespondedtoeachofthe16recommendations.
June 17, 2014 StatusUpdate:OnJune17,2014,Ex‐ImBankprovidedastatusupdateforeachofthe16recommendations,whichincludedinformationfromtheFebruary2013managementresponse.AsummaryoftheBank’scorrectiveactionstoaddressthe16recommendationsisprovidedinAppendixDbelow.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
35
Appendix D: Summary of Ex‐Im Bank Corrective Actions to Address Recommendations – 2010 OIG Report
Table 4: Summary of Corrective Actions
No. Details A1. Ex‐ImBank’sApril2013EconomicImpactProcedures and MethodologicalGuidelines
(“ProceduresandGuidelines”)assignresponsibilitytotheBank’sPolicyandPlanningGroup(“PPG”)staffforconductingeconomicimpactanalysis(“EIA”),includingtheanalyticfindingsandrecommendations.ThePPGprovidessupportingmaterialtotheBoard,includingindependentstudiesandtheapplicant’ssubmittedinformation,addressingbothtechnicalandfinancingcompetition.Finally,theproceduresandguidelinesclarifythattheBoardretainstheresponsibilityforapprovingatransaction,despiteadversefindingspresentedbythePPG,ifthe“overallbenefitsexceedthecosts.”
A2. TheApril2013ProceduresandGuidelines,whichare posted ontheBank’swebsite,describethemethodologyindetail,aswellasthePPGstaff’sassumptionsfortheanalysisofeconomicimpact.
A3. TheEx‐ImBankBoardhasapprovedallproceduresandguidelines,includingtheApril2013ProceduresandGuidelinesthatexpandedtheinformationandanalysesavailableforBoarddeterminations.Thisadditionalmaterialcanbeprovidedbyapplicants,orobtainedfromindependentmarketorindustryexperts,andincludesinformationaboutcompetition,pricingmechanisms,anddisplacement.
B1. TheEx‐ImBankBoardconsidersotherfactorsinadditiontotradeflowimpactintheEIA:(1)structuraloversupplyrelevance;(2)potentiallyaffectedparties’comments;and(3)interagencyviews(i.e.,ReviewingAgencies).TheProceduresandGuidelinesexpandedthetypesofinformationavailablefortheEIA,includinginformationaboutcompetition,pricingadvantage,proportionality,andmarket‐basedpricing.Inaddition,certainassumptionscanbechangedforcomparisonpurposesintheanalysis.
B2. Ex‐ImBankexpandeditsEIAmethodologyguidelines.Forexample,theguidelinesnowallowconsiderationundercertainconditionsofthenewforeignproductionimpactfromtheBank’sproportionalshareoftheproject.TheBankalsowillconsideralternatetradeflowanalysesfortransactionsinindustrieswithrobustUSproducers.
B3. Ex‐ImBankisconsideringfurtherwhetherthereisafeasibleandusefulapproachtoretrospectivelyassessthevalidityofkeyassumptionsintheanalysisofeconomicimpact.
B4. Ex‐ImBankassertsthat“US marketorientation”isacriticalfactorbecauseofthepotentialforsignificantdisplacementinUSproductionandthusthefactorshouldremainontheSensitiveSectorsList.TheBankalsoassertsthattheCharteronlyprovidesfortheList’sapprovalbytheBank’sPresidentandnottheBoard.BasedonthispositionaboutthePresident’sandtheBoard’srespectiveroles,theBankstatesthattheListshouldnotbeaddedtotheeconomicimpactproceduresandguidelinesfortheBoard’sreviewandapproval.
C1. Ex‐ImBank’sApril2013ProceduresandGuidelinesprovidetheBank’sEIAmethodsandarepostedonitswebsite.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
36
No. Table 4. Summary of Corrective Actions
DetailsC2. Ex‐ImBank’sinternalprocedures (i.e.,April2013ProceduresandGuidelines),which
describeitsEIAmethods,havebeenfinalizedandarepubliclyavailable.
C3. Ex‐ImBankfollowstheconditionsinSection2(e)(7)(d)and3(c)(10)(F)oftheBank’sCharterinmakingeconomicimpactreportspublicallyavailable.
D1. Ex‐ImBankisdeterminingwhetheritwouldbeappropriatetoaddsectorstoitslistofsectionsin“undersupply.”
D2. Ex‐ImBankrequiresapplicantstoprovide,ifpossible,independentdataorindustryreports,oralternativelythebestavailablemarketinformation,toinformtheanalysis,whichinturnhelpsexpeditetheapplicationprocesstime.
D3. Ex‐ImBankprovidesbyFederalRegisternoticetheopportunityforaffectedpartiestosubmitwhitepapersandstudiesfortheBank’sconsiderationintheEIA.
D4. AtthesametimeEx‐ImBankprovidesnotificationofanapplicationintheFederalRegister,itnotifiesthecongressionaloversightcommitteesoftransactionsrequiringadetailedEIA.TheBankalsoassertsthatitinitiatesearlycommunicationswithrelevantcongressionalrepresentativesabouttransactions,andcontinuesitspracticeofsubmittingmonthlyreportstotheReviewingAgencies.
D5. BytheApril2013ProceduresandGuidelines,Ex‐ImBankprovides14daysfortheinteragencygrouptoreviewandcommentonthedraftEIA.
D6. Ex‐ImBankhiredaneconomistinJuly2013withadditionalexpertiseforthePPG’seconomicimpactteam.
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
37
Appendix E: GAO Recommendations and Status – 2007 Report
Table 5: GAO Recommendations and Status
No. Details
1.
Closed–Implemented:ToimproveEx‐Im’sidentificationandanalysisofapplicationsforeconomicimpact,theChairmanoftheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStatesshouldreviewthe$10millionthresholdtodeterminewhetheradditionalstepsareneededtomitigatetheriskofexemptingfrommoredetailedreviewapplicationsthatcouldmeetthedefinitionofsubstantialinjury.Theadditionalstepscouldinclude,forexample,selectivelyreviewingtransactionsthatwouldaffectrelativelysmallUSindustriesorsensitivesectors.
2.
Closed–Implemented:ToimproveEx‐Im’s identificationandanalysisofapplicationsforeconomicimpact,theChairmanoftheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStatesshouldcreatespecificmethodologicalguidelinesforstaffanalyzingapplicationsforeconomicimpact,bearinginmindrelevantOfficeofManagementandBudgetguidancewhereappropriate.
3.
Closed–Implemented:ToimproveEx‐Im’sidentificationandanalysisofapplicationsforeconomicimpact,theChairmanoftheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStatesshouldreviewandstrengtheninternalcontrolsconcerningtheeconomicimpactanalysistoensure,forexample,thatstaffmembersconductingtheanalyseshavesufficienttrainingandguidanceinEx‐Im’seconomicimpactmethodology,thatrelevantEx‐Imstaffverifyandapprovetheanalyses,andthatsufficientdocumentationismaintainedtorecordkeyinformation.
4.
Closed–Implemented:Toimprovethepublictransparencyoftheeconomicimpactprocessforinterestedandaffectedparties,theChairmanoftheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStatesshouldclarifypubliclyavailableproceduresbyincludingmoreinformationregardingEx‐Im’smethodologyforanalyzingapplications,suchasdefininghowitincorporates“oversupply”determinationsinitsanalysisandwhatmeasuresitusesandspecifyingunderwhatconditions"proportionality"wouldbeused.
5.
Closed–NotImplemented:Toimprovethepublictransparencyoftheeconomicimpactprocessforinterestedandaffectedparties,theChairmanoftheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStatesshouldinforminterestedpartiesaboutthesensitivesectorlistbyincludingareferencetothelistintheeconomicimpactprocedures.
6.
Closed–NotImplemented:Toimprovethepublictransparencyoftheeconomicimpactprocessforinterestedandaffectedparties,theChairmanoftheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStatesshouldpublisheitherindividually,orinthepubliclyavailableboardminutes,thefinaldeterminationsregardingwhetheraprojectwouldhaveapositiveornegativeimpact.
Source: GAO’s Export‐Import Bank: Improvements Needed in Assessment of Economic Impact (GAO‐07‐1071, dated September 12, 2007) report, “Recommendations” tab at http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO‐07‐1071
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
38
Appendix F: References
AirTransportAssociationofAmerica,etal.v.Export‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStates,878F.Supp.2d42,(D.D.C.,2012).Retrievedfromhttps://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi‐bin/show_public_doc?2011cv2024‐55
CounciloftheInspectorsGeneralonIntegrityandEfficiency.(2012,January).Qualitystandardsforinspectionandevaluation.Retrievedfromhttps://www.ignet.gov/sites/default/files/files/committees/inspect‐eval/iestds12r.pdf
DeltaAirLines,Inc.v.Export‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStates,718F.3d974(D.C.Cir.2013).Retrievedfromhttp://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate‐courts/cadc/12‐5294/12‐5294‐2013‐06‐18.html
DeltaAirLines,Inc.,etal.v.Export‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStates,13‐CV‐0192‐RC,(D.C.Cir.2015).Retrievedfromhttps://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi‐bin/show_public_doc?2013cv0192‐54
DeltaAirLines,Inc.,etal.v.Export‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStates,13‐CV‐0424‐RC,(D.C.Cir.2015).Retrievedfromhttps://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi‐bin/show_public_doc?2013cv0424‐50
DeltaAirLines,Inc.,etal.v.Export‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStates,14‐CV‐0042‐RC,(D.C.Cir.2015).Retrievedfromhttps://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi‐bin/show_public_doc?2014cv0042‐26
ExecutiveOrder6581CreatingtheExport‐ImportBankofWashington.(1934,February2).Retrievedfromhttp://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=14772
ExecutiveOrder6638AuthorizingtheFormationofaBankingCorporationtoBeKnownasSecondExport‐ImportBankofWashington,DC.(1934,March9).Retrievedfromhttp://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/_resources/images/eo/eo0018.pdf
Export‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStates.(2013,May15).Detailedeconomicimpactanalysisfortransactionsthatenableforeignproductionofanexportablegood,informationneededtoconductandanalysis.Retrievedfromhttp://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files//Information‐Needed‐to‐Conduct‐a‐Detailed‐Economic‐Impact‐Analysis‐Goods%5B1%5D.pdf
Ex‐ImBank.(2013,May15).Economicimpactanalysisfortransactionsthatenableforeignairlineservices,informationneededtoconductananalysis.Retrievedfromhttp://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files//Information‐Needed‐to‐Conduct‐a‐Detailed‐Economic‐Impact‐Aircraft‐Passenger‐Services%5B1%5D.pdf
Ex‐ImBank.(2007,April).Economicimpactprocedures.
Ex‐ImBank.(2013,April).Economicimpactproceduresandmethodologicalguidelines.Retrievedfromhttp://www.exim.gov/policies/economic‐impact
Ex‐ImBank.(2005,June).Policyhandbook:Economicimpact.
Ex‐ImBank.(2012,September27).Proposaleconomicimpactproceduresandmethodologicalguidelines.
Ex‐ImBank.(2014,June),ReporttotheUSCongressontheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStatesandglobalexportcreditcompetitionfortheperiodJanuary1,2013throughDecember31,2013.Retrievedfromhttp://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files/newsreleases/US-Ex-Im-Bank-2012-Competitiveness-Report-to-Congress-Complete.pdf
Ex‐ImBank.(n.d.)ResponseonremandfromtheUnitedStatesCourtofAppealsfortheDistrictofColumbiaCircuitDeltaAirlines,Inc.v.Export‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStates(June18,2013):
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
39
Responseone.Retrievedfromhttp://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files//newsreleases/Option‐1‐Memo‐OGC‐11‐22‐13cd‐accessible‐v2.pdf
Ex‐ImBank.(n.d.)ResponseonremandfromtheUnitedStatesCourtofAppealsfortheDistrictofColumbiaCircuitDeltaAirlines,Inc.v.Export‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStates(June18,2013):Responsetwo.Retrievedfromhttp://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files//newsreleases/Option_2_Memo‐OGC‐11‐22‐13‐accessible.pdf
Ex‐ImBankEconomicImpactPolicy,77Fed.Reg.59397(2012,September27).Retrievedfromhttp://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR‐2012‐09‐27/pdf/2012‐23866.pdf
Ex‐ImBankSunshineActMeeting,77Fed.Reg.67363(2012,November9).Retrievedfromhttp://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR‐2012‐11‐09/pdf/2012‐27421.pdf
Export‐ImportBankOfficeofInspectorGeneral.(2010,September17).Evaluationreportrelatingtoeconomicimpactprocedures(PublicationNo.OIG‐EV‐10‐03).Retrievedfromhttp://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files//oig/reports/EIB_Report_Final_Complete_Web‐pdf‐uploaded‐via‐Bulk‐Upload‐at‐ts‐2012‐07‐17‐15‐40‐50.pdf
Export‐ImportBankReauthorizationActof2012,Pub.L.No.112‐122,126Stat.350‐364.(2012,May30).Retrievedfromhttp://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW‐112publ122/pdf/PLAW‐112publ122.pdf
Mullins,B.(2015,March12).Boeinghelpedcraftownloanrule.TheWallStreetJournal.Retrievedfromhttp://www.wsj.com/articles/boeing‐helped‐craft‐own‐loan‐rule‐1426203934
OfficeofManagementandBudget.(2004,December21).Management’sresponsibilityforinternalcontrol(PublicationNo.OMBCircularA‐123Revised).Retrievedfromhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a123_rev
TheCharteroftheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStates.(2012,August30).Retrievedfromhttp://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files//newsreleases/Updated_2012_EXIM_Charter_August_2012_Final.pdf
USGovernmentAccountabilityOffice.(2007,September12).Export‐ImportBank:Improvementsneededinassessmentofeconomicimpact(PublicationNo.GAO‐07‐1071).Retrievedfromhttp://www.gao.gov/products/GAO‐07‐1071
USGAO.(1999,November).Standardsforinternalcontrolinthefederalgovernment(PublicationNo.GAO/AMD‐00‐21.3.1).Retrievedfromhttp://www.gao.gov/assets/80/76455.pdf
EXPORT‐IMPORTBANK–OFFICEOFINSPECTORGENERAL
FOLLOW‐UPREPORTOIG‐EV‐15‐01
40
Acknowledgements ThisReportwaspreparedbytheOfficeofInspectionsandEvaluations,OfficeofInspectorGeneralfortheExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStates.SeveralindividualscontributedtothisReportincludingJenniferFain,DeputyAIGIEandMarkThorum,AIGIE.
OfficeofInspectorGeneralExport‐ImportBankoftheUnitedStates811VermontAvenue,NWWashington,DC20571202‐565‐3908www.exim.gov/about/oig