1
Copyright # 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DYSLEXIA 13: 152 (2007) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/dys.338 & CORRIGENDUM Follow-up of an Exercise-based Treatment for Children with Reading Difficulties David Reynolds and Roderick I. Nelson Dyslexia 2007; 13(2): 78–96. In the above paper, slight inaccuracies appeared in paragraph 1 of the Results section, which should read: Data were collected individually, fitting in with school timetables, and so the precise timing of the tests varied over around 4 weeks. The four testing periods were: time T1 ¼ July 2001 (with the exercise treatment starting in September 2001 for the initial treatment group), time T2 ¼ March=April 2002 (start of treatment for delayed treatment group), time T3 ¼ September= October 2002, and time T4 ¼ September 2003. NFER and SATs test were administered in June of each year.

Follow-up of an exercise-based treatment for children with reading difficulties

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Follow-up of an exercise-based treatment for children with reading difficulties

Copyright # 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DYSLEXIA 13: 152 (2007)

Published online in Wiley InterScience(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/dys.338

& CORRIGENDUM

Follow-up of an Exercise-basedTreatment for Children withReading DifficultiesDavid Reynolds and Roderick I. Nelson

Dyslexia 2007; 13(2): 78–96.

In the above paper, slight inaccuracies appeared in paragraph 1 of theResults section, which should read:

Data were collected individually, fitting in with school timetables, and sothe precise timing of the tests varied over around 4 weeks. The four testingperiods were: time T1 ¼ July 2001 (with the exercise treatment starting inSeptember 2001 for the initial treatment group), time T2 ¼March=April2002 (start of treatment for delayed treatment group), time T3 ¼ September=October 2002, and time T4 ¼ September 2003. NFER and SATs test wereadministered in June of each year.