Folie 1 Electricity 2012, Eilat 14.-16.11.2012 ts/1 Standardization in complex systems- Smart Grid Dr. Bernhard Thies Chairman of the Board of Directors

Folie 1 Electricity 2012, Eilat 14.-16.11.2012ts/1

Standardization in complex systems-

Smart Grid

Dr. Bernhard Thies

Chairman of the Board of Directors DKEGermany


-DKE

-Smart Grid

-EU Mandate M/490

-Use Case Methodology

-Use Cases in the Architectural model

Standardization in complex systems


-DKE

-Smart Grid

-Mandate M/490





• Non-profit organization, independent from

governmental funding

• Located in Frankfurt am Main

• 105 Employees

• 3.500 technical experts

• 290 committees and subcommittees

• Over 450 working groups

• 750 meeting days per year

• Production of more than 40.000 pages per year

DKE in Figures


The International System of Standardization

DKE DKE

ISO IEC

ETSICEN CENELEC

GermanyGermany(national)(national)

EuropeEurope(regional)(regional)

InternationalInternational

TelecommunicationTelecommunicationGeneralGeneral ElectrotechnologyElectrotechnologyStandardizationStandardization


-DKE

-Smart Grid

-Mandate M/490





Sustainability: 20-20-20 targets Reduction of CO2 emissions

Increased generation based on renewable sources and

Need to increase grid and consumption efficiency - decrease losses

Security of supply Increase grid robustness and resilience

Integration of different generators (centralized and distributed)

Competitiveness and Internal Market development Better management of supply and demand

New market opportunities and increased efficiency of the market

Empowerment of consumers

All these challenges call for the restructuring of the grids, e.g. the structure of generation, market and the use of electricity.

Policy Drivers


Future Network Vision: from centralised power generation and unidirectional distribution up to fully meshed infrastructure with arbitrary energy flow

A Smart Grid is a Power Grid with a comprehensive

and distributed measurement, control,

communication and data processing infrastructure,

which continuously optimizes the power exchange

between generation and load in regard to

reliability, economics and environmental friendliness.


Flexibility as a New Target

Renewable generation is only partly controllable and predictable

On the producers‘ side increasingflexibility is demanded

Therefore the following will be necessary:

Storage Bulk Storage Capacities

Pump- or Air pressure storage Batteries

e.g. EV as well

Flexible Demand Load Shifting

Load Oriented

Generation

+

Generation Oriented

Consumption


Load / Storage / Generation Management

Biomass-/CHP

Wind Energy

Photo Voltaic

Controllable Load

Flexible tariffs, Peak shifting

New MarketPlaces

Storage

partly predictable, Non controllable

Predictable and controllable

Renewables

Load Management Thermal Storage: • Fridge, Freezer, Air condition• Heat pumpPeak shifting:• Loading of EV• Household appliances: dishwasher, washing machine, …

Storage ManagementClassical storage: • pumped storage, compressed airin future:• Battery

• Stationary• EV Electrical

Vehicle

Generation Management• Combination of controllable and non controllable generation• Automation / remote switching of distributed generation• Ancillary Services like provision of reactive power


-DKE

-Smart Grid

-EU Mandate M/490





Scope and Objective

The objective of this mandate is to develop or update a set of consistent standards within a common European framework that integrating a variety of digital computing and communication technologies and electrical architectures, and associated processes and services, that will achieve interoperability and will enable or facilitate the implementation in Europe of the different high level Smart Grid services and functionalities as defined by the Smart Grid Task Force that will be flexible enough to accommodate future developments.

Building, Industry, Appliances and Home automation are out of the scope of this mandate; however, their interfaces with the Smart Grid and related services have to be treated under this mandate.

Interconnection to other mandated work

This mandated work will be co-ordinated with the outcomes of the existing mandates M/441 and M/468 to ensure a coherent standardization framework (a bi-directional process).

Mandate M/490


Description of mandated work

• Technical Reference ArchitectureA technical reference architecture, which will represent the functional information data flows between the main domains and integrate many systems and subsystems architectures.

• Set of Consistent StandardsA set of consistent standards, which will support the information exchange (communication protocols and data models) and the integration of all users into the electric system operation.

• Sustainable standardization processesSustainable standardization processes and collaborative tools to enable stakeholder interactions, to improve the two above and adapt them to new requirements based on gap analysis, while ensuring the fit to high level system constraints such as interoperability, security, and privacy, etc.

Mandate M/490


Mandate Scope

Organizational Structure of the Smart Grid Coordination Group

Smart GridCoordination

Group(former JWG)

EC Reference

Group

SustainableProcesses

SG Information

Security

First Set of Standards

Reference Architecture

SteeringCommittee

Further Tasks

• Report 2.0• Liaisons• Promotion

Existing WGsNew joint WGExisting WGsNew joint WGsExisting WGs

• NIST• JISC• China• Etc.

TC LevelTC Level

JWG LevelJWG Level

EC LevelEC Level


Europe – Standardization Mandate M/490

First set of First set of standardsstandards

Reference Reference ArchitectureArchitecture

SustainableSustainableProcessesProcesses

Use-Case-Management, -

Collection, Analysis, -

Harmonization

Kist existing Standards, identify and

address gaps

Create Tools for a Smart Grid StandardizationSupport Technical Standardization CommitteesDeliver a first set of solutions until end of 2012

Smart GridSmart GridInformation Information

SecuritySecurity

End-To-End IT-Security, Data protection and Data Models

Create a strategic, flexible

framework


Milestone Plan“ProcessesUse Case Management”

Inform about Methodology,

Template

Comments Draft Report

1. Stakeholder meeting - Start UC collection

First Analysis- Generic Use

Cases

Collection of Use Cases

Time Table of the WG Sustainable Processes

05 07 09 11 02 06 121006 08 10 12 01 03 04 05 07 08 09 11

2011 2012

Draft Report

Report version Report version 0.6x0.6x

Workshop 2. and 3. to Generic

Use Cases

Report version Report version 1.0 – Final 1.0 – Final

Webinar Webinar about use case:about use case:

Generic use cases Generic use cases and methodsand methods

Comments & Alignment

Draft Report

Draft Report to EU Commission

Comments Comments Draft ReportDraft Report

Further work on Further work on implementation – implementation – refer to outlookrefer to outlook

First Version of the Use Case Management Repository

(UCMR)


-DKE

-Smart Grid

-Mandate M/490





Use Cases – Interrelation between Domain and IT Experts

UML-Graphics

Domain Expert IT Expert

System Engineer

Template as

form or check list

UML Unified Modeling Language

for the technology neutral description of interactions and actors


Use Cases – under discussion in standardization

EPRI transferred the use cases approach to Smart Grid / Energy systems

published as IEC PAS 62559 „IntelliGrid Methodology for Developing Requirements for Energy Systems“ in 2008

with a first suggestion for a template

Currently various discussions in standardization about further steps towards a use case approach

IEC SG3 -> TC 8, coordination of use cases, new template as CD 8/1307/NP

Use cases had been used internally in various Technical Committees (TC)

Mandate M/441 Smart Metering Mandate M/490 Smart Grid Smart Grid Coordination Group

– Working Group Sustainable Processes New discussions in the Strategic Group

System aspects


TC 13

TC 8 TC 22TC 57

TC 82

TC 88TC YZ

TC XY„TC 8“, „TC 57“, „TC 22“ -> IEC

Why is standardization interested in the use case approach?


Smart Grid – Collaboration of Technical Committees

TC 13

TC 8 TC 22TC 57

TC 82

TC 88TC YZ

TC XY

New processes for complex, cross cutting systems?e.g. collaborative description of use cases

Web 2.0?


Discussion - Use Cases and Requirements

Requirements Requirements

High LevelUse CaseHigh LevelUse Case


Individual Use Case Individual Use Case

GenericUse CaseGeneric

Use Case


Use Case


Use CaseGeneric

Use CaseGeneric

Use Case


Use Case

Individual Use CaseIndividual Use Case



ProjectProject

Individual Requirements

Individual Use Case

Individual Use Case

GenericUse Case

GenericUse Case

Individual Use Case

Individual Use Case

GenericUse Case

GenericUse Case

Individual Use Case

Individual Use Case

GenericlUse Case

GenericlUse Case

Business Case

High LevelUse Case

Top down approach

Bottom up approach


Individual Use Case

Individual Use Case

GeneralUse Case

GeneralUse Case

Individual Use Case

Individual Use Case

GeneralUse Case

GeneralUse Case

Individual Use Case

Individual Use Case

GeneralUse Case

GeneralUse Case

Discussion - Use Cases and Requirements – an example

Facilitate connections at all voltages / locations

for any kind of devices

Aggregation DER

Aggregation DER

EV-Intelligent Charging

EV-Intelligent Charging

VPP

Individual Business CaseEG1 report EU

Commission:High Level

Functionalities

IEC 61850IED

Connection to DER

Optimizationcalculation Forecast

Send new tariff in standardized

format

Energy ManagementOptimization- Calculation

set value reactive

power to xx


Individual Use Case Individual Use Case

GeneralUse CaseGeneral

Use Case


Use Case

General Use CaseGeneral

Use CaseGeneral

Use CaseGeneral

Use Case


Use Case




ProjectProject


Level of ABSTRACTION Low

Primary use case scenario





Level of GRANULARITY

Primary Use case

A

Primary Use case

B

High

Low

High LevelUse Case

Conceptual Description

Business Cases

can be linked to architecture and systems

High


Use Case Process

ChangesChangesIdeas/RequirementsIdeas/Requirements ImplementationImplementation

Use Case Methodology

Template Tools Terminology Classification Process

Use Case proposals

from:

• Projects• National Technical Committees• Regulation / Legislation• Association• Companies

Use Case Collection

Generic use cases

StandardizationRepository

Analysis for Standards

• Gaps

• Revisions

• Mapping

Standard

Profiles

Test

Test

Use

Cases

Comments HarmonizationDetailing

ReferenceArchitecture-

SGAM

IT Security

Current ActivitiesTasks of the WG SP


Overall Process Based on IEC/SC3D Workflow

Import use Import use case(s) from case(s) from

UCMR to CDDUCMR to CDD

Quality checkQuality check

ErrorsErrors

No errorsNo errors

Edit imported Edit imported use caseuse case

Submit use Submit use case to VTcase to VT

RejectRejectApproveApprove

Process by Process by VTVT

Initiation of Change Initiation of Change Request (CRRequest (CR))

Update use case database and Update use case database and actor listactor list

Error reportError report

Discard Discard importimport

CDD Component Data Dictionary VT Validation TeamCR Change RequestUCMR Use Case Management Repository


Use Case Management Repository (UCMR)- Overview

Use Case Management Repository

Web 2.0 User InterfaceWeb 2.0 User Interface

Actors, Use Cases,Technical Requirements

Actors, Use Cases,Technical Requirements

UML-Model

Website

Word/ PDF

Use

r Wor

kspa

ce

Use

r Wor

kspa

ce

Use

r Wor

kspa

ce

Use

r Wor

kspa

ce


-DKE

-Smart Grid

-Mandate M/490





Requirements for a Smart Grid architecture framework

Able to represent• system aspects of smart grids in comprehensive, consistent and understandable

manner • interoperability aspects

Able to locate gaps in standardization

Able to cope with • moving targets (in regulation) and • evolutionary implementation of smart grids

Reuse existing foundational concepts and work

Independent from technology and solutions

© C

EN

-CE

NE

LEC

-ET

SI

2011


SGAM: Putting all together

GenerationGenerationTransmissionTransmission

DistributionDistributionDERDER

CustomerCustomerPremisePremise

ProcessProcess

FieldField

StationStation

OperationOperation

EnterpriseEnterprise

MarketMarket

DomainsDomains

ZonesZones

Component Layer

Communication Layer

Information Layer

Function Layer

ProtocolProtocolProtocolProtocol

Data ModelData ModelData ModelData Model

Outline of Usecase

Subfunctions

Business Layer

Business ObjectivesPolit. / Regulat.. Framework

InteroperabilityDimension

© C

EN

-CE

NE

LEC

-ET

SI

2011


Generation Transmission Distribution Customer PremiseDER

Process

Field

Station

Operation

Enterprise

Market

HV MV LV

G H

RTUDER

Controller

HMI HES

DMS Computer

Gateway

CRM Computer

HAN Controller

DataConcentrator

IEC

618

50-7

-420

IEC

618

50-7

-4

CIMIEC 61968-4

UseCases

Generic Use CasesRepository

Further findings:R&D, Pilots, Implementation

2. StepMap UCs to SGAM

1. StepIdentify New GenericUse Cases from findings

4. StepIdentify new gaps

NEW Gap List(follow process 2. from here)

Source

Expected outcome

Result• Identification of “new gaps”• Systematically investigate

need for new standardization according to the new process established by SG-CG

Target datefrom 2013

SGAM

GAP

Time HorizonProcess set end 2012Iteration ongoing from 2013

source: Dr. Ralph Sporer, Chairman

Generation

Transmission

Distribution

DER

CustomerPremise

Process

Field

Station

Operation

Enterprise

Market

Domains

Zones

Component Layer

Communication Layer

Information Layer

Function Layer

ProtocolProtocol

Data ModelData Model

Outline of Usecase

Subfunctions

Business Layer

Inte

rop

era

bili

ty

SGAM

3. StepLocate

requirements for standards

Mandate M/490 – SG-CGHow can we systematically identify additional gaps in future?


Use Cases for Standardization

Use Cases are the basis for further development of standards in complex systems in the following areas Interoperability

Define how standards are used Define abnormal (error) situation handling

Technical requirements IT security and privacy Safety Performance …

Terminology new terms for the IEV based on the smart grid glossary

Standards gap analysis


•Public Governmental driven (BMWi, PTB (Eichrecht/Messwesen), BSI (Smart Meter Gateway), Bundesnetzagentur, AG Intelligente Netze, ...)•Associations (ZVEI, BITKOM, VDMA, ZVEH, ...)•VDE-Expert Groups (ITG, ETG, FNN)•E-Energy / R&D Groups (Web2Energy

•EU Commission Task Force Smart Grid und EG Expert Groups•Associations (ENTSO-E, Eurelectric, ESMIG, CECED...)•R&D Projects (FINSENY, MIRABEL, ADDRESS, ...)

Overview with examples of Smart Grid-Standardization - Committees and Groups

Council

SMB

TC 57 TC 13

Smart Grid-Comittees

SG3 PC 118

TC 57 WG 21, 15, 17, ...

TC 8 AHG 4

TC 13 WG 14

Lenkungskreis

Technical Commitees

International

Expert and similar Groups with relation to standardization

TC 8 ...

TC 57 TC 13 TC 8X, 205 ...

K 952 K 461 K 261 ...

European

German

CEN, CENELEC ETSI

Smart GridCoordindation

Group

Fokusgruppen Arbeitskreise

WG‘s

•Global Smart Grid Federation•ISGAN•UN

Overview with examples

CEN, CENELEC ETSI

Smart MeterCoordindation

Group

WG‘seMobility Coordindation Group

ITU-T

ISO/IEC JTC 1

NIA ErgonomieNA023-00-4-08 GAK

TC 247, TC 294

M2M

ISO/IEC JTC 1 SWG Smart Grids

Focus Group Smart GRid

MSB


Thank you for your attention!

DKE Deutsche KommissionElektrotechnik Elektronik Informationstechnik im DIN und VDE

Stresemannallee 15D-60596 Frankfurt/Main

Tel: +49 69 6308-240E-Mail: [email protected]

Dr. Bernhard ThiesChairman of the Boardof Directors

Documents

Folie 1 Electricity 2012, Eilat 14.-16.11.2012 ts/1 Standardization in complex systems- Smart Grid Dr. Bernhard Thies Chairman of the Board of Directors