Upload
oma
View
20
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Focusing Efforts on Rural Health through a Workforce Approach. Raymond Fang Joshua Umar, Ann Davis, Michael Powe American Academy of Physician Assistants. Presentation Outline. Determinants of Americans’ poor health. Physician shortage, high costs, and mal-distribution. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Focusing Efforts on Rural Health through a Workforce Approach
Raymond FangJoshua Umar, Ann Davis, Michael Powe
American Academy of Physician Assistants
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Presentation Outline Determinants of Americans’ poor health
Physician shortage, high costs, and mal-distribution
Workforce approach as a solution to increase health care accessibility and affordability
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Challenges Facing American’s Health
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Disparities:in life expectancy between the US and mainstream high-income nations
(Data source: OECD Health Data 2009)
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Disparities: in life expectancy between rich and poor Americans
(Source: Gopal K. Singh and Mohammad Siahpush (2006), Widening socioeconomic inequalities in US life expectancy, 1980–2000, International Journal of Epidemiology 35(4) PP. 969-979)
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
(US CDC Quick Stats: Life Expectancy at Birth, by Race and Sex --- United States, 2000--2009* Weekly May 13, 2011 / 60(18);588)
Disparities: in life expectancy between ethnical groups in the US
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
(Data Source: The data was taken from the American Human Development Project's second national report, Measure of America 2010-2011)
Disparities: in life expectancy across geographic areas in the US
Hawaii
Californ
ia
Connecticu
t
North Dak
ota
Colorado
South
Dakota
Vermont
Iowa
Wash
ington
Rhode Islan
d
Nebraska
Illinois
Virginia
Montan
aAlas
ka
New Mexic
o
Mary
land
Indiana
Nevada
Miss
ouri
Georgia
Tennesse
e
Arkansas
Oklahoma
Alabam
a
Miss
issippi
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
6.7 Years
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
(Source: Cosby , AG et al (2008) Preliminary Evidence for an Emerging Nonmetropolitan Mortality Penalty in the United States, American Journal of Public Health 98(8) PP. 1470-1472)
Disparities: in mortality rates between urban and rural Americans
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Determinants of Health
Health Outcomes
Genetic/Demographic Determinants
Social Determinants Socio-Demographic
Interaction
Disease
Physical/Built Environment
Social Exclusion
Behavioural Determinants
Death
Healthcare Determinants
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Challenges Facing Healthcare Providers
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
OECD (2006) Purchasing power parities (PPPs) are the rates of currency conversion that eliminate the differences in price levels between countries.Healthcare expenditure as % of GDP
Challenges: The American Healthcare System and Physicians are Expensive
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
(Data source: AAMC Physician Workforce Report 2010)
Including Shortage of 46,000 Primary Care Physicians
More shortages in rural and underserved urban areas
Challenges: Physician Shortages
(Data source: American Academy of Physician Assistants 2009 census, American College of NP 2010 Report, 2011 State Physician Workforce Data Release, American Association of Medical Colleges, Center for Workforce Studies, March 2011 https://www.aamc.org/download/181238/data/state_databook_update.pdf, the American Human Development Project of the Social Science Research Council )
States are ranked from left (lowest clinician density) to right (highest)
Nevada
Oklahoma
Utah
Mississ
ippi
Indiana
Illinois
Arizona
New Mexic
o
North Caro
lina
Ohio
Nebraska
South Caro
lina
Wyoming
Minnesota
Washingto
n
North Dako
ta
Montana
Oregon
Virginia
Delaware
Hawaii
Marylan
dMain
e
New Hampshire
Connecticut
0
5
10
15
20
25
Pove
rty
Rate
Challenges: Workforce Mal-distribution
13
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Study Focus:Exploring the potential roles of physician assistants (PAs) in addressing public health and health equity through strengthening primary care services to rural Americans
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Why is Primary Care Important?
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Why Is Rural Health Important?■ Rural residents are poorer: Poverty rate is consistently higher in
rural areas than in urban areas. In 2010, poverty rates were16.5% and 14.9% in rural and urban areas, respectively.
■ Rural residents are sicker: Rural adults are more likely to report having diabetes; Rural residents are more likely to be obese; Rural women are less likely to receive preventive screening tests. Suicide rate is higher in rural men and alcohol abuse is higher in rural youth.
■ Rural physicians are fewer and older: More physician shortage especially in primary care in rural areas. There were 55 primary care physicians per 100,000 residents in rural areas in 2005, compared with 72 in urban areas. More rural physicians are close to retirement age.
■ Health insurance is less sufficient: Rural residents are less likely to be medically insured at the same level of urban residents.
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Why Physician Assistants?
Median Compensation Level in the US in 2010
Type of Practice *Physician **Physician Assistants
Primary Care*** $202,392 $85,000
Specialty Care $356,885 $93,400(Source: *MGMA Physician Compensation and Production Survey: 2011 Report based on 2010 data** American Academy of Physician Assistants PA Census: 2011 Report Based on 2010 data*** Primary care includes general internal medicine, family medicine, general pediatrics, and geriatrics)
Physician Assistants (PAs): are clinicians licensed to practice medicine as members of physician-directed teams.Currently there are about 90,000 practicing PAs in the US.
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
PhysiciansPAs
NPs
0%
5%
10%
Remote Rural/Frontier Small Town Large Town
PAs and NPs are More Likely to Practice in Rural America
(Percentages of rural healthcare providers by level of rurality in 2010)Pe
rcen
t (%
)
(Data source: AHRQ Primary Care Workforce Facts and Stats No.3, AHRQ Pub. No. 12-P001-4-EF, January 2012)
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Distribution of PAs Practicing in Rural America in 2010
(Percentages of PAs by Level of Rurality with 95% Confidence Intervals)
(Data source: American Academy of Physician Assistants, AAPA 2010 Census; 1.2% of PAs with unknown rurality were excluded)
16.9%
9.6%
4.3%3.0%
16.3%
9.1%
4.0%2.7%
17.5%
3.3%4.6%
10.1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Rural Large Town Small Town RemoteRural/Frontier
Level of Rurality
Perc
ent o
f PAs
Level of Rurality
■U.S. population in rural areas: 20% ■Physicians in rural areas: 11%
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Study Goals:
Increase accessibility to care Address physician shortage and mal-distribution Lower health care costs Implement patient-centeredness Strengthen prevention, coordination of care,
chronic disease management, consultation, and other primary care interventions
Workforce solutions to
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
DefinitionsPrimary Care: includes family medicine,
general internal medicine, general pediatrics and geriatrics.
Urban-Rural Areas: rural and urban designations are taken based on standard U.S. Census classification scheme. Roughly, urban populations≥500,000; large town populations =10,000-50,000; small town populations = 2,500–9,999; and remote village populations ≤2,500 people.
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Data and Methods
■ Clinical Data: Clinical characteristics of PAs were examined with data from the American Academy of Physician Assistants’ (AAPA) 2010 annual census survey.
■ Demographic/Certification Data: Demographic characteristics and certification status were from data from AAPA Masterfile
■ Complex Survey Analysis: Complex survey analytic tool in SPSS was used to provide a stratified survey analysis with 95% confidence interval.
■ Sample Weights: Post-stratification weights were assigned to base survey respondents based on demographic and certification status and to module survey respondents by additional stratification variables number of years as a PA, clinical setting and specialty to ensure the data would be representative of the entire PA population.
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
PAs Perform Clinical Functions That Traditionally Physicians Do (Mean percentages of PAs with specific clinical functions with 95% CIs)
(Data source: American Academy of Physician Assistants, 2010 PA Census,)
In Physician Offices
In Health Centers
In Hospitals
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Level of Autonomy Varies across Clinical Work Settings(Mean Percentages of Patient Visits Made to PAs without a Need for
Physician Consultation with 95% Statistical Confidence Intervals)
(Data source: American Academy of Physician Assistants, AAPA 2010 Census,)
Health Centers
Physician OfficesHospitals
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Rural PAs are More Likely to Practice in Primary Care
(Percentages of PAs in Primary Care with 95% Statistical Confidence Intervals)
(Data source: American Academy of Physician Assistants, AAPA 2010 Census)
26.3%
43.8%
63.9%
78.4%
25.5%
41.2%
60.3%
74.8%
27.0%
82.1%
67.5%
46.5%
10%
30%
50%
70%
90%
Metropolitan Large Towns Small Towns RemoteRural/Frontier
Level of Rurality
Perc
ent o
f PAs
in P
rimar
y Ca
re Rural Areas: 55.1% (53.1% - 57.1%)Urban Areas
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Rural PAs are More Likely to Practice in Health Centers
(Percentages of PAs Working in Health Centers with 95% Confidence Intervals)
8.6%
18.7%
29.5%
51.6%
8.1%
16.6%
25.9%
46.9%
9.2%
56.2%
33.2%
20.9%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Metropolitan Large Towns Small Towns RemoteRural/Frontier
Level of Rurality
Perc
ent o
f PAs
Wor
king
in H
ealth
Cen
ters
Rural Areas: 27.3% (25.5.% - 29.1%)Urban Areas
(Data source: American Academy of Physician Assistants, AAPA 2010 Census)
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Rural PAs are More Likely to PerformClinical Preventive Services
(Percentages of PAs Performing Clinical Preventive Services with 95% Confidence Intervals)
59.6%
66.1%69.1%
79.5%
58.0%
61.7% 61.4%
73.2%
61.2%
85.7%
76.8%
70.5%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Metropolitan Large Towns Small Towns RemoteRural/Frontier
Level of Rurality
Perc
ent o
f PAs
Per
form
ing
Clin
ical
Pre
senti
ve
Serv
ices
Rural Areas: 69.8% (66.5% - 73.0%)Urban Areas
(Data source: American Academy of Physician Assistants, AAPA 2010 Census)
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Rural PAs are More Likely to PerformChronic Disease Management
(Percentages of PAs Performing Chronic Disease Management with 95% Confidence Intervals)
63.9% 65.2%68.1%
80.3%
62.3% 60.8%60.0%
74.2%
65.5%
86.5%
76.2%
69.8%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Metropolitan Large Towns Small Towns RemoteRural/Frontier
Level of Rurality
Perc
ent o
f PAs
Per
form
ing
Chro
nic D
isea
se
Man
agem
ent
Rural Areas: 69.3% (65.9% - 72.7%)Urban Areas
(Data source: American Academy of Physician Assistants, AAPA 2010 Census)
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Rural PAs are More Likely to PerformCoordination of Care
(Percentages of PAs Performing Care Coordination with 95% Confidence Intervals)
45.1%48.0%
56.4%
64.6%
43.4% 43.2%
48.2%
57.3%
46.8%
71.9%
64.5%
52.7%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Metropolitan Large Towns Small Towns RemoteRural/Frontier
Level of Rurality
Perc
ent o
f PAs
Per
form
ing
Care
Coo
rdin
ation
Rural Areas: 53.7% (50.0% - 57.3%)Urban Areas
(Data source: American Academy of Physician Assistants, AAPA 2010 Census)
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
PAs Practice at Top of License in Rural Areas(Mean Percentages of Patient Visits Made to PAs without a Need for Physician
Consultation with 95% Statistical Confidence Intervals)
67.4%
78.6%73.0%
83.3%87.7%
66.3%
76.7%
70.1%
79.1%
85.0%
68.5%
90.3%87.5%
75.9%
80.5%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Urban Rural Large Rural Small Town RemoteRural/Frontier
Level of Rurality
Perc
ent o
f PAs
with
Hig
h Au
tono
my
(Data source: American Academy of Physician Assistants, AAPA 2010 Census; 1.2% of PAs with unknown rurality were excluded)
Level of Rurality
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Graduates from Rural PA Programs are More Likely to Practice in Rural Areas
(Percentages of PAs practiced in rural areas with 95% Confidence Intervals)
15.9%
32.8%
15.3%
29.6%
16.5%
35.9%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Graduates from Urban PA Programs Graduates from Rural PA Programs
Level of Rurality
Perc
ent o
f PAs
Pra
ctici
ng in
Rur
al A
reas
(Data source: American Academy of Physician Assistants, AAPA 2010 Census)
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
ConclusionsPAs who practice in rural areas are more likely to practice
in primary care with high autonomy
PAs are more likely to practice in rural areas
PAs who practice in rural areas are more likely to perform services in clinical prevention, chronic disease management, and care coordination
PAs who practice in rural areas are more likely to work in health centers where most underserved patients are seen
PAs who graduated from rural PA schools are more likely to work in rural areas
Both incentives and policy interventions are needed to engage PAs in practicing in rural areas
The 2012 USPHS Scientific and Training Symposium, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June 19-21 2012
Questions? Thank You!
Raymond FangVice President for ResearchAmerican Academy of Physician Assistants2318 Mill Road, Suite 1300Alexandria, Virginia 22314United States of AmericaEmail: [email protected]: (571) 319-4327