Upload
minamperu
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
1/17
Report from CCAPs MAIN
Workshop in Bogota, Colombia
Mobility, mitigation of gas emissions and quality of life in Asian and Latin American CitiesLima, Peru Monday 28 May, 2012
Chuck KooshianCenter for Clean Air Policy
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
2/17
CCAP MAIN Project - Latin American Dialogue
Teams from 8 Latin American countries
Representatives of funding organizationsExpert speakers
Discuss how to design, fund and implement NAMAs
Transportbreakout group
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
3/17
NAMAs are not like CDM projects
Supported NAMAs can receive fromdeveloped nations for capacity building and for helping supportbroader investment in low carbon development strategies.
The form of the financial support has not been defined in theUNFCCC process but it is likely to include grants, loans, loan andrisk guarantees, policy support, writing down the cost oftechnologies, etc.
Compared to CDM, NAMAs can emphasize, can finance efforts at a larger
scale/scope, and can work in sectors where crediting is harderto estimate.
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
4/17
CCAP transportation NAMA research and policy papers
Transportation NAMAs: A Proposed Framework
MRV for NAMAs: Tracking Progress while Promoting
Sustainable Development
Report 1:Data And Capacity Needs for Transportation
NAMAs: Data Availability
Report 2: Data and Capacity Needs for Transportation
NAMAs: Data Selection
Report 3: Data and Capacity Needs for Transportation
NAMAs: Capacity Building Needs
www.ccap.org
http://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/811/CCAP%20Transport%20NAMAs%20policy%20brief.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/1029/MRV%20for%20NAMAs%2011-30-11.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/1029/MRV%20for%20NAMAs%2011-30-11.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/925/CCAP_Transport_NAMA_Data_Availability.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/925/CCAP_Transport_NAMA_Data_Availability.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/972/Transport_NAMA_Data_Selection.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/972/Transport_NAMA_Data_Selection.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/973/Transport_NAMA_Capacity-Building.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/973/Transport_NAMA_Capacity-Building.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/973/Transport_NAMA_Capacity-Building.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/973/Transport_NAMA_Capacity-Building.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/972/Transport_NAMA_Data_Selection.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/972/Transport_NAMA_Data_Selection.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/925/CCAP_Transport_NAMA_Data_Availability.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/925/CCAP_Transport_NAMA_Data_Availability.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/1029/MRV%20for%20NAMAs%2011-30-11.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/1029/MRV%20for%20NAMAs%2011-30-11.pdfhttp://www.ccap.org/docs/resources/811/CCAP%20Transport%20NAMAs%20policy%20brief.pdf7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
5/17
Estimated growth of light duty vehiclesbaseline scenario
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
6/17
Reduce how muchour vehicles use(supply side)
Reduce how muchwe use our vehicles(demand side)
A NAMA can be developed to:
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
7/17
Vehicle efficiency and fuel standards are important,can have political barriers.
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
8/17www.growingwealthier.info
Sacramento: Infrastructure savings:$18,000 per household
Denver: households within mile oflight rail line rose in value by 18% 2006-8; other Denver homes lost 7.5%
Dallas: Retail grew 33% in 1styear afterlight rail began
US: Lower rates of pedestrian fatalitiesin compact urban areas, higher rates incar-oriented suburban areas
Addressing demand side has economic benefits
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
9/17
9
Cost-Effective GHG Reductionsfrom Sustainable Urban Transportation
Demand side measures have greater development benefits
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
10/17
SCN 1:
Sprawling Cities focused onRail and Road Infrastructure
SCN 2:
Relatively Compact Cities
with Complete network
SCN 3:
Compact Cities with
Complete network and
transit focused
Coordinating land and transportation can cut investmentrequirements by more than half
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
SCN-1 SCN-2 SCN-3
Investment in Billions - INR
Capacity Building
Parking
ITS &ATC
Workshops
Terminals
Depot
Rail Transit-kms
BRTS Network-kms
Buses
Street Infrastructure
(US $556)
(US $ 376)
(US $ 275)
Source: Prof. H.M. Shivanand Swamy, Centre of Excellence in Urban Transport, CEPT University
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
11/17
Potential NAMA Frameworkfor Sustainable Urban Development
Goal: in urbandevelopment and transportation systems
Can the climate funds turn the ship for thedevelopment?
to design, evaluate and
implement development agreements for integratedtransportation, land use and housing.
for implementation E.g., grants and/or concessionary debt financing
for: walking, cycling, smart growth, BRT, TOD,
accessible social housing Include projects with short-term observable results
reductions and economic
impacts
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
12/17
important to government andpublic
What development goals would the NAMA support?
important to the financers, the loangivers/equity investors.
What is the future demand for housing and commercialbuildings?
important to the donors, i.e. thegrant givers.
What is the potential market penetration of efficientdevelopment? See #2
Key scoping questions for aSustainable Development NAMA
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
13/17
Simple, sketch-level GHG savings estimate Avoid CDM style artificial precision, getting lost in details
e.g., using a regional travel model or corridor model
Assess results progressivelyDo, Measure, Learn Measurement is a tool to enhance economic and environmental
performance Start with implementation metrics(was station constructed as
designed) Move to progress metrics(amount of new housing/ $ investment
within km of transit, VKT, mode split) Finally, calculate GHG emissions and reductionsGHG tons vs BAU
Additional MRV recommendations
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
14/17
Jefferson-Davis
10.9
Rosslyn-Ballston
17.4
Washington DC
12.8
Loudon County
50.1
Fairfax County
35.2
Charles County
65.6
Daily VMTWashington DC region(VMT/capita)
Regional Avg
34.2
Montgomery Cty
33.3
Prince Georges
36.3
Arlington Cty
21.6
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
15/17
Draft NAMA Concept for Colombia
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
16/17
Potential for a Sustainable
Urban Development NAMA
7/31/2019 Focus on Transport
17/17
Thank you