Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
May 16 – 20, 20162015 Gas-Lift Workshop 1
Foam Assisted Gas Lift
• Ahmed Farag, Jim Hall
• Production Technologist
• Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V.a company within Shell Upstream International
39th Gas-Lift WorkshopHouston, Texas, USAMay 16 – 20, 2016
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 2
May 16 – 20, 20162016 Gas-Lift Workshop 3
Executive summary
Trial Time: 8 days
Total spent: ~ USD $300,000
Net Oil gain: 60-65 m3/d
Optimum concentration of foam: 800 ppm
Possible savings: *10,000 m3/d of gas lift
Applicable base: gas lifted oil wells with high water cut (tested at 70%)
No process upsets
Background information
Global projects R&D – Test Foaming in Oil Wells
America – proposal stage
Brunei – execution phase
Rotterdam field was chosen to test the concept of foam lift in oil
operated wells
RTD-4 picked because:
- high water cut (~70%)
- outflow is constrained due to the gas lift arrangement
- max deviation only 55 deg, allows for cap string installation
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 4
Success criteria
• Production Criteria
• Noticeable increase in oil production and/or less sluggish flow behaviour
• Production rate is the same at a 50% lower gas lift rate with foam application.
• Facilities Criteria
• No process upsets to topsides, including the formation of emulsions.
• Ensure export oil quality meets spec:
• <1% water
• <75 g/m3 salt content
• Ensure water disposal and injection meets spec:
• <25 ppm TSS
• <250 ppm oil in water concentration
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 5
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 6
Well Diagram & Target depth
Capillary installation set-up
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 7
Production data
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 8
Pre-cap string
installation
Post-cap string installation
- Water/glycol injection
- No foam injection
Baseline data
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 9
Cycle: 1 hour high production 2 hours low production
Average
Gross: 215 m3/d
Water: 175 m3/d
Oil: 40 m3/d
Average
Gross: 85 m3/d
Water: 50 m3/d
Oil: 35 m3/d
CYCLE
Start of foam injection
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 10
STEP 1 STEP 2
Observations:
• Longer stable production at higher rates compared to baseline data at the same gas lift injection rate.
•(Average gross rate increased from 155m3/day to 305m3/day)
•(Average oil rate increased from 40m3/day to 90m3/day)
•Observations for LAB: No breach in oil/water specs. No foam seen on samples on surface so far
Increasing foam concentration
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 11
STEP 3STEP 4
STEP 5STEP 6
STEP 7STEP2
STEP 1
Step No
foam
1
(1.5 kg/hr)
2
(2 kg/hr)
3
(4 kg/hr)
4
(6 kg/hr)
5
(8 kg/hr)
6
(10 kg/hr)
7
(11 kg/hr)
Foam
(ppm)
0 110 160 285 430 560 690 760
Gross
(m3/d)160 307 290 320 320 325 330 330
Water
(m3/d)120 217 207 230 230 235 240 240
Oil (m3/d) 40 90 83 90 90 90 90 90
Production data – specification breach
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 12
Foam Injection rate increased to16kg/hr (1140 ppm)
Oil in Water above limit of 250 mg/L
Optimum foam rate/concentration
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 13
Step 7: 11 kg/hr
Foam Concentration: 800 ppm
Phase 2: Decreasing gas lift injection rate
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 14
Phase 2: Decreasing gas lift injection rate
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 15
1
1098765432
Step 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
GL rate(m3/d) 14,000 11,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000
Gross (m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75
Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55
Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20
By using foam rate of 4 kg/hr and only 4,000 m3/d , the same production rates can be
achieved when the well was on production with 14,000 m3/d gas lift and no foam
Overview of production
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 16
Re-test; production data
Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 17
No foam in system Foam injected – 800 ppm
Significant change in production with the addition of foam
May 16 – 20, 20162016 Gas-Lift Workshop 18
Executive summary
Trial Time: 8 days
Total spent: ~ USD $300,000
Net Oil gain: 60-65 m3/d
Optimum concentration of foam: 800 ppm
Possible savings: *10,000 m3/d of gas lift
Applicable base: gas lifted oil wells with high water cut (tested at 70%)
No process upsets
May 16 – 20, 20162016 Gas-Lift Workshop 19
Copyright
Rights to this presentation are owned by the company(ies) and/or author(s) listed on the title page. By submitting this presentation to the Gas-Lift Workshop, they grant to the Workshop, the Artificial Lift Research and Development Council (ALRDC), and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), rights to:
– Display the presentation at the Workshop.
– Place it on the www.alrdc.com web site, with access to the site to be as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee.
– Place it on a CD for distribution and/or sale as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee.
Other uses of this presentation are prohibited without the expressed written permission of the company(ies) and/or author(s) who own it and the Workshop Steering Committee.
May 16 – 20, 20162016 Gas-Lift Workshop 20
Disclaimer
The following disclaimer shall be included as the last page of a Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Course. A similar disclaimer is included on the front page of the Gas-Lift Workshop Web Site.
The Artificial Lift Research and Development Council and its officers and trustees, and the Gas-Lift Workshop Steering Committee members, and their supporting organizations and companies (here-in-after referred to as the Sponsoring Organizations), and the author(s) of this Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Training Course and their company(ies), provide this presentation and/or training material at the Gas-Lift Workshop "as is" without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the information or the products or services referred to by any presenter (in so far as such warranties may be excluded under any relevant law) and these members and their companies will not be liable for unlawful actions and any losses or damage that may result from use of any presentation as a consequence of any inaccuracies in, or any omission from, the information which therein may be contained.
The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in these presentations and/or training materials are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Sponsoring Organizations. The author is solely responsible for the content of the materials.
The Sponsoring Organizations cannot and do not warrant the accuracy of these documents beyond the source documents, although we do make every attempt to work from authoritative sources. The Sponsoring Organizations provide these presentations and/or training materials as a service. The Sponsoring Organizations make no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the presentations and/or training materials, or any part thereof, including any warrantees of title, non-infringement of copyright or patent rights of others, merchantability, or fitness or suitability for any purpose.