20
May 16 20, 2016 2015 Gas-Lift Workshop 1 Foam Assisted Gas Lift Ahmed Farag, Jim Hall Production Technologist Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V. a company within Shell Upstream International 39 th Gas-Lift Workshop Houston, Texas, USA May 16 20, 2016

Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

May 16 – 20, 20162015 Gas-Lift Workshop 1

Foam Assisted Gas Lift

• Ahmed Farag, Jim Hall

• Production Technologist

• Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V.a company within Shell Upstream International

39th Gas-Lift WorkshopHouston, Texas, USAMay 16 – 20, 2016

Page 2: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 2

Page 3: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

May 16 – 20, 20162016 Gas-Lift Workshop 3

Executive summary

Trial Time: 8 days

Total spent: ~ USD $300,000

Net Oil gain: 60-65 m3/d

Optimum concentration of foam: 800 ppm

Possible savings: *10,000 m3/d of gas lift

Applicable base: gas lifted oil wells with high water cut (tested at 70%)

No process upsets

Page 4: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Background information

Global projects R&D – Test Foaming in Oil Wells

America – proposal stage

Brunei – execution phase

Rotterdam field was chosen to test the concept of foam lift in oil

operated wells

RTD-4 picked because:

- high water cut (~70%)

- outflow is constrained due to the gas lift arrangement

- max deviation only 55 deg, allows for cap string installation

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 4

Page 5: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Success criteria

• Production Criteria

• Noticeable increase in oil production and/or less sluggish flow behaviour

• Production rate is the same at a 50% lower gas lift rate with foam application.

• Facilities Criteria

• No process upsets to topsides, including the formation of emulsions.

• Ensure export oil quality meets spec:

• <1% water

• <75 g/m3 salt content

• Ensure water disposal and injection meets spec:

• <25 ppm TSS

• <250 ppm oil in water concentration

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 5

Page 6: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 6

Well Diagram & Target depth

Page 7: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Capillary installation set-up

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 7

Page 8: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Production data

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 8

Pre-cap string

installation

Post-cap string installation

- Water/glycol injection

- No foam injection

Page 9: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Baseline data

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 9

Cycle: 1 hour high production 2 hours low production

Average

Gross: 215 m3/d

Water: 175 m3/d

Oil: 40 m3/d

Average

Gross: 85 m3/d

Water: 50 m3/d

Oil: 35 m3/d

CYCLE

Page 10: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Start of foam injection

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 10

STEP 1 STEP 2

Observations:

• Longer stable production at higher rates compared to baseline data at the same gas lift injection rate.

•(Average gross rate increased from 155m3/day to 305m3/day)

•(Average oil rate increased from 40m3/day to 90m3/day)

•Observations for LAB: No breach in oil/water specs. No foam seen on samples on surface so far

Page 11: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Increasing foam concentration

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 11

STEP 3STEP 4

STEP 5STEP 6

STEP 7STEP2

STEP 1

Step No

foam

1

(1.5 kg/hr)

2

(2 kg/hr)

3

(4 kg/hr)

4

(6 kg/hr)

5

(8 kg/hr)

6

(10 kg/hr)

7

(11 kg/hr)

Foam

(ppm)

0 110 160 285 430 560 690 760

Gross

(m3/d)160 307 290 320 320 325 330 330

Water

(m3/d)120 217 207 230 230 235 240 240

Oil (m3/d) 40 90 83 90 90 90 90 90

Page 12: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Production data – specification breach

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 12

Foam Injection rate increased to16kg/hr (1140 ppm)

Oil in Water above limit of 250 mg/L

Page 13: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Optimum foam rate/concentration

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 13

Step 7: 11 kg/hr

Foam Concentration: 800 ppm

Page 14: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Phase 2: Decreasing gas lift injection rate

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 14

Page 15: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Phase 2: Decreasing gas lift injection rate

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 15

1

1098765432

Step 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

GL rate(m3/d) 14,000 11,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000

Gross (m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75

Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55

Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20

By using foam rate of 4 kg/hr and only 4,000 m3/d , the same production rates can be

achieved when the well was on production with 14,000 m3/d gas lift and no foam

Page 16: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Overview of production

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 16

Page 17: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

Re-test; production data

Feb. 4 – 8. 20132013 Gas-Lift Workshop 17

No foam in system Foam injected – 800 ppm

Significant change in production with the addition of foam

Page 18: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

May 16 – 20, 20162016 Gas-Lift Workshop 18

Executive summary

Trial Time: 8 days

Total spent: ~ USD $300,000

Net Oil gain: 60-65 m3/d

Optimum concentration of foam: 800 ppm

Possible savings: *10,000 m3/d of gas lift

Applicable base: gas lifted oil wells with high water cut (tested at 70%)

No process upsets

Page 19: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

May 16 – 20, 20162016 Gas-Lift Workshop 19

Copyright

Rights to this presentation are owned by the company(ies) and/or author(s) listed on the title page. By submitting this presentation to the Gas-Lift Workshop, they grant to the Workshop, the Artificial Lift Research and Development Council (ALRDC), and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), rights to:

– Display the presentation at the Workshop.

– Place it on the www.alrdc.com web site, with access to the site to be as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee.

– Place it on a CD for distribution and/or sale as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee.

Other uses of this presentation are prohibited without the expressed written permission of the company(ies) and/or author(s) who own it and the Workshop Steering Committee.

Page 20: Foam Assisted Gas Lift - ALRDC...(m3/d) 315 290 280 270 255 225 195 160 120 75 Water (m3/d) 230 215 210 200 190 165 145 120 90 55 Oil (m3/d) 85 75 70 70 65 60 50 40 30 20 By using

May 16 – 20, 20162016 Gas-Lift Workshop 20

Disclaimer

The following disclaimer shall be included as the last page of a Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Course. A similar disclaimer is included on the front page of the Gas-Lift Workshop Web Site.

The Artificial Lift Research and Development Council and its officers and trustees, and the Gas-Lift Workshop Steering Committee members, and their supporting organizations and companies (here-in-after referred to as the Sponsoring Organizations), and the author(s) of this Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Training Course and their company(ies), provide this presentation and/or training material at the Gas-Lift Workshop "as is" without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the information or the products or services referred to by any presenter (in so far as such warranties may be excluded under any relevant law) and these members and their companies will not be liable for unlawful actions and any losses or damage that may result from use of any presentation as a consequence of any inaccuracies in, or any omission from, the information which therein may be contained.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in these presentations and/or training materials are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Sponsoring Organizations. The author is solely responsible for the content of the materials.

The Sponsoring Organizations cannot and do not warrant the accuracy of these documents beyond the source documents, although we do make every attempt to work from authoritative sources. The Sponsoring Organizations provide these presentations and/or training materials as a service. The Sponsoring Organizations make no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the presentations and/or training materials, or any part thereof, including any warrantees of title, non-infringement of copyright or patent rights of others, merchantability, or fitness or suitability for any purpose.