34
Task 6 - Safety Review and Licensing On the Job Training on Stress Analysis Pisa (Italy) June 15 – July 14, 2015 F.M. with Finite Element analysis - Different calculation techniques + Numerical examples (ANSYS Workbench) 1/2 Davide Mazzini – Ciro Santus

F.M. with Finite Element analysis - Different calculation ...people.unipi.it/static/ciro.santus/MaterialeDidattica/FM_Classes... · F.M. with Finite Element analysis - Different calculation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Task 6 - Safety Review and LicensingOn the Job Training on Stress Analysis

Pisa (Italy)June 15 – July 14, 2015

F.M. with Finite Element analysis - Different calculation techniques + Numerical examples (ANSYS Workbench) 1/2

Davide Mazzini – Ciro Santus

2

Content

• Different FE techniques

• ANSYS Workbench

- Crack geometry element mesh preparation

- KI(II,III) and J calculation

- Examples

• ANSYS Apdl

- The quarter point technique

- Examples

FM parameters with Finite Element method

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

3

FM parameters computed with FE

I II IIIStress Intensity Factor(s)SIFs: , ,

Energy release rate:

Contour integral:

Crack Mouth Opening Displaceme

Crack Tip Opening Displ

n

acment CTOD

t CMOD

K K K

G

J

Stress parameters

Energy parameters

Deformation parameters

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

4

Fracture Mechanic parameters for the three modes

Three different loading modes for a crack

Mode I:Opening

Mode II:In-plane shear

Mode III:Out-of-plane shear

2 2I

2I II II

2K KJ K

E G

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

5

ANSYS help:

ANSYS different calculation techniques

d dii

uJ w y T sx

dd

JA

I II III, ,K K KI II III

I II III

, ,, ,

(only if 2/3are zero,or ratios are known)

J K K KJ K K K

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

6

KCALC command

ANSYS Apdl

ANSYS Help

Quarter point technique:The mid-side node is shifted at ¼ of the element size to reproduce the displacement derivative singularity.From displacement to (elastic) KI(II,III)

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

7

KCALC command

ANSYS Apdl

M. Beghini, C. Santus. "An application of the weight function technique to inclined surface cracks under rolling contact fatigue, assessment and parametric analysis". Engineering Fracture Mechanics. Vol.98, pp.153–168, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.10.024

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

8

CINT command options

ANSYS Workbench

Crack front

Overlapped but distinct nodes

Mid-side nodes not shifted at ¼

‘Spiderweb’ mesh

(ANSYS Wb =>ANSYS classic)

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

9

CINT command options

ANSYS Workbench

Workbench default elementthus VCCT is not available

Plane elements (not for Workbench)

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

10

CINT command options

ANSYS Workbench

Postprocessing menu: only available CINT for J and CINT for K1(2,3)

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

11Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

CINT command options

ANSYS Workbench

CINT,SIFS

Volume (not path) integration, with the virtual load technique to distinguish K1, K2 and K3

This way the SIFs are obtained as integration, rather than point displacement as KCALC

A coarser mesh is enough for an accurate solution

12

How to introduce a crack

ANSYS Workbench

Introduce the ‘Fracture’ module into the Modeler

(this feature is available only since the 14.5 ANSYS version, the current version is 16.0)

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

13

How to introduce a crack

ANSYS Workbench

1. It is possible to (easily) introduce a crack starting from a solid uncrackedbody and automatically generate the spiderweb mesh distribution at the crack front(Worth noting: this is for a semielliptical crack only)

2. Alternatively a (generic) crack front can be prepared in advance and introduced as the crack front

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

14

How to introduce a crack

Mesh preparation

ANSYS Workbench

Usually Hexahedrons are to be preferred than Tetrahedrons Here Tets are necessary for mesh continuity

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

15

Mesh preparation

ANSYS Workbench

A strong local refinement is requiredThe Sphere of Influence tool is recommended

New local Coordinate System, both for mesh and for crack position/ orientation

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

16

Crack position and orientation

ANSYS Workbench

The Crack is identified by its dedicated Coordinate System

The crack semi-elliptical ‘center’ is coincident with Coordinate System origin point

X axis has to be inward the component to be cracked and it should be perpendicular

If not the crack plane is going to be perpendicular to the surface anyway

X-Z axes define the crack plane, thus Y is the vertical direction

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

17

Mesh and geometry parameters of the crack

ANSYS Workbench

Dir. ZDir. X

Buffer Zone

Preview of the crack to be introduced

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

18

The introduction of the crack is just a matter of mesh

ANSYS Workbench

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

19Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

Spiderweb mesh parameters

ANSYS Workbench

20

Half-space surface crack basic example

ANSYS Workbench

Same commands for loads and constraints

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

21Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

Postprocessing, K1(2,3) and J along the crack front

ANSYS Workbench

Curvilinear coordinate

22Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

Contour integration results

ANSYS Workbench

32 4 5 6

1Contours

12 ≈3 ≈4…

Usually the first is the less accurate, while the others show very similar results

Tabular values

23Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

Validation example 1 (half space)

ANSYS Workbench

0

I

I

2mm 2 mm100 MPa

ANSYSWb:

(A) 162MPa mm 5.12MPa m

(B) 177 MPa mm 5.60MPa m

a tc

K

K

I

I

Laham'sSIFs Handbook:

(A) 165MPa mm 5.22 MPa m(diff.% 1.9%)

(B) 179MPa mm 5.68MPa m(diff.% 1.4%)

K

K

0

2mm2 mm100 MPa ( 0, 1...5)i

a tc

i

24Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

Validation example 2 (pipe)

ANSYS Workbench

I

Laham's SIFs Handbook:

(A) 112MPa mm 3.53MPa m(diff.% 2.3%)

K

0 50 MPa ( 0, 1...5)i bg i

I

ANSYS Wb:

(A) 109MPa mm

3.45MPa m

K

i 50 mm10 mm

Rt

2mm

4 mmac

25Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

ANSYS Workbench

Exercise 1:Calculate the three SIFs.Which on is expected to be zero?

T

Torque10 N mM

45

Introduce an inclined crack on the specimen surface

1mm1mm

ac

26

ANSYS Workbench

Exercise 2:Verify the ASTM standard CT specimen formula for KI

WB

P

a

2 3 4I 3/2

/2 (0.886 4.64 13.32 14.72 5.64 )

(1 )

a WPK

B W

How to manage a semi-elliptical crack for this case?

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

27

ANSYS Workbench

Exercise 2:

2 3 4I 3/2

I

10 kN 22.5mm, 60mm, 122 (0.886 4.64 13.32 14.72 5.64 ) 699MPa mm

(1 )

(ANSYS) 782MPa mm% 12%

P a W B mmPK

B W

K

Corner blends Almost straight portion of a semi-elliptical crack

Large percentage difference

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

28

How to introduce a crack – Pre-Meshed Crack

ANSYS Workbench

1. It is possible to (easily) introduce a crack starting from a solid uncrackedbody and automatically generate the spiderweb mesh distribution at the crack front(Worth noting: this is for a semielliptical crack only)

2. Alternatively a (generic) crack front can be prepared in advance and introduced as the crack front

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

29

Pre-Meshed Crack, CT specimen example

ANSYS Workbench

A crack (almost zero angle) is initially introduced on the CAD model

Notch region

Almost crack geometry

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

30Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

Pre-Meshed Crack, CT specimen example

ANSYS Workbench

Hexahedrons mesh is to be preferred in

this case

31

Pre-Meshed Crack, CT specimen example

ANSYS Workbench

Named selection:Crack front

The edge is then converted into the nodes

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

32

Pre-Meshed Crack, CT specimen example

ANSYS Workbench

Crack orientation, not crack actual shape and size

The associated coordinate system is placed at one edge of the crack

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

33

Pre-Meshed Crack, CT specimen example

ANSYS Workbench

Usual(self-equilibrated)loading

Stress distributionPlane stress

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015

34

Pre-Meshed Crack, inaccurate results

ANSYS Workbench

2 3 4I 3/2

10 kN 30 mm, 60 mm, 122 (0.886 4.64 13.32 14.72 5.64 ) 971MPa mm

(1 )

P a W B mmPK

B W

I (ANSYS) 480 MPa mmK

(ANSYS) ??J negative

Maybe this technique is intended for future development…

Pisa, June 15 – July 14, 2015