Upload
joanna-s-nicholson
View
55
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Fluid Mechanics Class first Lab report on Viscosity. Falling Ball experiment
Citation preview
Falling Ball Viscometry Lab #1
Chase Hilderbrand
Joanna Nicholson
Eddwie Perez
September 11, 2015
Professor: Dr. Danvers Johnson
CWR3201C
INTRODUCTION
The objective of the viscometry lab is to use a falling ball viscometer to determine the
viscosity of a fluid. The viscosity of a fluid is a quantification of its resistance to deformation by
various stresses. This is accomplished by measuring the velocity of a ball bearing, of known
diameter, travelling through the unknown fluid. In order to calculate the results, one must assume
that the ball had reached terminal velocity, and was not affected by turbulence until the bottom of
the tube. The velocities were calculated using marked points on the tube, before the bottom. As
well, there is an assumption made that Stokes’ Law is valid, and that minor temperature changes
throughout the fluid make extremely minor differences and can be ignored.
THEORY
Once a sphere falling through a fluid has reached terminal velocity, it is in equilibrium. The
Force of Gravity (FG) is therefore equal to the Resistive Force (FR).
FG = FR (1)
The Force due to gravity is a function of Volume (V), Density (ρ), and gravity (g):
𝐅G = (Vball)(ρball)(g) = 𝟒
𝟑(𝛑)(𝐫2)(𝛒ball)(𝐠) (2)
The Resistive Force is a function of the Viscosity (µ), and our measured velocity v):
FR = 6πµrv (3)
By substituting Equation 2, and 3 into Equation 1, we can derive a function for viscosity:
µ = 1/18(ρball – ρfluid)(g)(D)2
v (4)
To find Kinematic Viscosity, (ν):
ν = µ
𝛒 (5)
The Reynolds Number, (Re) is used to describe the relationship of the kinematic forces to
viscous forces. It is a ratio that describes the way in which the ball reacts to the viscosity of the
fluid. A low Reynolds number indicates a laminar flow.
Re = 𝛒𝐯𝐃
µ
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
1. Measure the diameter of the available balls and weigh them. Record the diameter and weight.
2. Determine a distance from the surface of the liquid at which the ball reaches terminal velocity by
doing a dry run; dropping the ball and looking for the instant the ball starts to drop at a continuous rate.
3. Once the distance from the surface where terminal velocity begins is established, determine a
distance below the point where terminal velocity is reached that is relatively far from the bottom of
the tube.
4. Mark two points, one below the location at which terminal velocity is initially reached and the
other above the point chosen in step 3. Record the distance between these two points.
5. Using the balls that were measured in step 1 drop one ball in the liquid. Start the timer at P1 and
stop the timer at P2. Record the time.
6. Repeat step 5 three more times with the remaining balls measured in step 1.
RESULTS
Equation 4 was used with the mean data from the above to get a value for viscosity, 0.694 P
and a kinematic viscosity of 5.60E-4 m2/s was also calculated.
µ = (𝟏
𝟏𝟖) × (𝝆ball-𝝆gly )
𝒌𝒈
𝒎𝟑×𝟗. 𝟖𝟏𝟎
𝒎
𝒔𝟐∗ (
𝟗.𝟖𝟗
𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎) 2𝒎𝟐 ×
𝟏
𝟎.𝟒𝟕𝟏
𝒎
𝒔= 𝟎. 𝟕𝟔𝟐𝑷
DISCUSSION
The calculated kinematic viscosity was compared to the values in Figure 1 (Munson et al.
2009). An assumption was made that the temperature of the viscometer was approximately 21.0
°C. In comparing the calculated value of dynamic viscosity the value was close to that of glycerin
and suggests that the liquid in the viscometer was likely glycerin. As well, it could be observed that
the sphere fell more slowly than it would in water, and in fact, the dynamic viscosity value was
Ball
diameter
(D) in
(mm)
Drop
time (t)
in (s)
Drop
distance
s (mm)
Rate of
fall v=s/t
(mm/s)
Re
Mass
of ball
(g)
ρ ball
(kg/m3)
Viscosity
(µ) in
(Ns/m2)
Kinematic
Viscosity
(v) in
(m2 /s)
Test 1 9.89 2.12 1000 471.70 7.65 4.05 7995.88 0.7624 0.00061
Test 2 9.88 1.84 1000 543.48 10.08 4.08 8055.11 0.6661 0.00053
Test 3 9.89 1.91 1000 523.56 9.40 4.06 8015.63 0.6889 0.00055
Test 4 9.88 1.91 1000 523.56 9.38 4.07 8035.37 0.6895 0.00055
Test 5 9.89 1.84 1000 543.48 10.12 4.06 8015.63 0.6636 0.00053
Mean 9.89 1.92 1000 521.16 9.32 4.06 8023.52 0.6941 0.00056
Standard
Deviation 0.001 0.018 0.00 2.94 0.15 0.16 22.500 0.46 0.00003
FLUID: Glycerine
Table 1. Falling Ball Data
greater than that of water; 762E-3 vs 1.002E-3 (water). The only notably erroneous measurement
was the time needed for the ball to travel 1000 mm on the first trial; there seems to be a delay as
compared to the other values. However, the overall standard deviation is only 2.94 and does not
severely alter the calculated viscosities.
CONCLUSIONS
The fluid in the viscometer was determined to be that of glycerin based on an assumption of a
consistent temperature of the viscometer and fluid and that the terminal velocity was established
far enough from the bottom and wall of the tube to prevent any turbulent interference. The largest
variance in the data was a delay in time to fall, although it was not very relevant to the final
calculations.
Figure 1
Works Cited
Munson, B. R., Young, D. F., Okiishi, T. H., Huebsch, W. W. (2009). Fundamentals of Fluid
Mechanics, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, Appendix B. pg. 714.