Upload
asrarudin-hamid
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
1/35
Fluid Management and
Shock ResuscitationKallie Honeywood
UBC Anaesthesia PGY-3
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
2/35
Outline
Normal Fluid Requirements
Definition of Shock
Types of Shock Hypovolemic Cardiogenic
Distributive
Obstructive
Resuscitation Fluids
Goals of Resuscitation
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
3/35
Body Fluid Compartments
Total Body Water = 60% body weight 70Kg TBW = 42 L
2/3 of TBW is intracellular (ICF) 40% of body weight, 70Kg = 28 L
1/3 of TBW is extracellular (ECF) 20% of body weight, 70Kg = 14 L
Plasma volume is approx 4% of total bodyweight, but varies by age, gender, bodyhabitus
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
4/35
Blood Volume
Blood Volume (mL/kg)
Premature Infant 90
Term Infant 80
Slim Male 75
Obese Male 70
Slim Female 65
Obese Female 60
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
5/35
Peri-operative Maintenance Fluids
Water
Sodium
Potassium replacement can be omitted forshort periods of time
Chloride, Mg, Ca, trace minerals andsupplementation needed only for chronic
IV maintenance Most commonly Saline, Lactated Ringers,
Plasmalyte
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
6/35
4 2 1 Rule
100 50 20 Rule for daily fluidrequirements
4 mL/kg for 1st 10 kg
2 mL/kg for 2nd 10 kg
1 mL/kg for each additional kg
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
7/35
Maintenance Fluids: Example
60 kg female
1st 10 kg: 4 mL/kg x 10 kg = 40 mL
2nd
10 kg: 2 mL/kg x 10 kg = 20 mL Remaining: 60 kg 20 kg = 40 kg
1 mL/kg x 40 kg = 40 mL
Maintenance Rate = 120 mL/hr
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
8/35
Fluid Deficits
Fasting
Bowel Loss (Bowel Prep, vomiting, diarrhea)
Blood Loss Trauma
Fractures
Burns Sepsis
Pancreatitis
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
9/35
Insensible Fluid Loss
Evaporative
Exudative
Tissue Edema (surgical manipulation) Fluid Sequestration (bowel, lung)
Extent of fluid loss or redistribution (the
Third Space) dependent on type ofsurgical procedure
Mobilization of Third Space Fluid POD#3
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
10/35
Insensible Fluid Loss
4 6 8 Rule
Replace with Crystalloid (NS, LR,Plasmalyte)
Minor: 4 mL/kg/hr
Moderate: 6 mL/kg/hr
Major: 8 mL/kg/hr
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
11/35
Example
68 kg female for laparoscopiccholecystectomy
Fasted since midnight, OR start at 8am
Maintenance = 40 + 20 + 48 = 108 mL/hr
Deficit = 108 mL/hr x 8hr
= 864 mL 3rd Space (4mL/kg/hr) = 272 mL/hr
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
12/35
Example
Intra-operative Fluid Replacement of:
Fluid Deficit 864 mL
Maintenance Fluid 108 mL/hr
3rd Space Loss 272 mL/hr
Ongoing blood loss (crystalloid vs. colloid)
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
13/35
Shock
Circulatory failure leading to inadequateperfusion and delivery of oxygen to vitalorgans
Blood Pressure is often used as an indirectestimator of tissue perfusion
Oxygen delivery is an interaction ofCardiac Output, Blood Volume, Systemic
Vascular Resistance
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
14/35
DO2
CaO2
CO
Sat %
PaO2
Hgb
HR
SV
Preload
Contractility
Afterload
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
15/35
Types of Shock
Hypovolemic most common Hemorrhagic, occult fluid loss
Cardiogenic Ischemia, arrhythmia, valvular, myocardial
depression
Distributive
Anaphylaxis, sepsis, neurogenic
Obstructive Tension pneumo, pericardial tamponade, PE
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
16/35
Shock States
BP CVP PCWP CO SVR
Hypovolemia
Cardiogenic -LV
- RV
Distributive
Obstructive
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
17/35
DO2
CaO2
CO
Sat %
PaO2
Hgb
HR
SV
Preload
Contractility
Afterload
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
18/35
Hypovolemic Shock
Most common
Trauma
Blood Loss
Occult fluid loss (GI)
Burns
Pancreatitis
Sepsis (distributive, relativehypovolemia)
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
19/35
Assessment of Stages of Shock% Blood
Volume loss
< 15% 15 30% 30 40% >40%
HR 100 >120 >140
SBP N N, DBP,postural drop
PulsePressure
N or
Cap Refill < 3 sec > 3 sec >3 sec orabsent
absent
Resp 14 - 20 20 - 30 30 - 40 >35
CNS anxious v. anxious confused lethargic
Treatment 1 2 Lcrystalloid, +maintenance
2 Lcrystalloid, re-evaluate
2 L crystalloid, re-evaluate,replace blood loss 1:3crystalloid, 1:1 colloid or bloodproducts. Urine output >0.5
mL/kg/hr
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
20/35
Fluid Resuscitation of Shock
Crystalloid Solutions
Normal saline
Ringers Lactate solution
Plasmalyte
Colloid Solutions
Pentastarch
Blood products (albumin, RBC, plasma)
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
21/35
Crystalloid Solutions
Normal Saline
Lactated Ringers Solution
Plasmalyte Require 3:1 replacement of volume loss
e.g. estimate 1 L blood loss, require 3 L of
crystalloid to replace volume
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
22/35
Colloid Solutions
Pentaspan
Albumin 5%
Red Blood Cells Fresh Frozen Plasma
Replacement of lost volume in 1:1 ratio
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
23/35
Oxygen Carrying Capacity
Only RBC contribute to oxygen carryingcapacity (hemoglobin)
Replacement with all other solutions will
support volume
Improve end organ perfusion
Will NOT provide additional oxygen carrying
capacity
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
24/35
RBC Transfusion
BC Red Cell Transfusion Guidelinesrecommend transfusion only to keep Hgb>70 g/dL unless
Comorbid disease necessitating highertransfusion trigger (CAD, pulmonary disease,sepsis)
Hemodynamic instability despite adequatefluid resuscitation
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
25/35
Crystalloid vs. Colloid
SAFE study (Saline vs. Albumin FluidEvaluation) Critically ill patients in ICU
Randomized to Saline vs. 4% Albumin for fluidresuscitation
No difference in 28 day all cause mortality
No difference in length of ICU stay,mechanical ventilation, RRT, other organfailure
NEJM 2004; 350 (22), 2247- 2256
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
26/35
Goals of Fluid Resuscitation
Easily measured
Mentation
Blood Pressure
Heart Rate
Jugular Venous Pressure
Urine Output
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
27/35
Goals of Fluid Resuscitation
A little less easily measured
Central Venous Pressure (CVP)
Left Atrial Pressure
Central Venous Oxygen Saturation SCVO2
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
28/35
Goals of Fluid Resuscitation
A bit more of a pain to measure
Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP)
Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR)
Cardiac Output / Cardiac Index
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
29/35
Mixed Venous Oxygenation
Used as a surrogate marker of end organperfusion and oxygen delivery
Should be interpreted in context of other clinical
information True mixed venous is drawn from the pulmonary
artery (mixing of venous blood from upper andlower body)
Often sample will be drawn from central venouscatheter (superior vena cava, R atrium)
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
30/35
Mixed Venous Oxygenation
Normal oxygen saturation of venous blood68% 77%
Low SCVO2 Tissues are extracting far more oxygen than
usual, reflecting sub-optimal tissue perfusion(and oxygenation)
Following trends of SCV
O2
to guideresuscitation (fluids, RBC, inotropes,vasopressors)
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
31/35
Goals of Resuscitation
Rivers Study- Early Goal Directed Therapyin Sepsis and Septic Shock
Emergency department with severe sepsis or
septic shock, randomized to goal directedprotocol vs standard therapy prior toadmission to ICU
Early goal directed therapy conferred lowerAPACHE scores, incidating less severe organdysfunction
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
32/35
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
33/35
DO2
CaO2
CO
Sat %
PaO2
Hgb
HR
SV
Preload
Contractility
Afterload
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
34/35
Bottom Line
Resuscitation of Shock is all about gettingoxygen to the tissues
Initial assessment of volume deficit, replace that
(with crystalloid), and reassess Continue volume resuscitation to target
endpoints
Can use mixed venous oxygen saturation toestimate tissue perfusion and oxygenation
7/29/2019 Fluid Management and Shock Resuscitation
35/35
References
Clinical Anesthesia 3rd Ed. Morgan et al.Lange Medical / McGraw Hill, 2002
Anesthesiology Review 3rd Ed. Faust, R.Churchill-Livingstone, 2002
Rivers, E. et al. NEJM 2001; 345 (19):1368 77
SAFE Investigators. NEJM 2004; 350:2247 - 56