76
Fluid Filtration Equipment Methods Measurements 8/25/2015 1 George E. King Engineering GEKEngineering.com

Fluid Filtration

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

N/A

Citation preview

Fluid Filtration

• Equipment

• Methods

• Measurements

8/25/2015 1 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Polymer Damage

• From: muds, pills, frac, carriers

• Stable? - for years

• location - depends on form polymer was in

– dispersed properly - surface to deep in formation

– in pills and mass - right in perfs

8/25/2015 2 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 3 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Particles in the Fluid

• Solids from tanks, lines and fluids

• Severe problem, but often ignored

8/25/2015 4 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 5 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 6 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 7 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 8 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 9 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 10 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Particulate Damage

• Unintended particulates - “dirty fluids”

– filter fluids to 5 microns at Beta of 1000

– maximum NTU of 30, preferable is 20

– clean tanks, lines - how about tubulars?

• Particles in fluid loss pills

– mixed in proper range for perm encountered?

– Will it come off formation? Can it come back thru pack? Thru screen? What about removal?

8/25/2015 11 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 12 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 13 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 14 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 15 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 16 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 17 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

8/25/2015 18 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Beta Rating

• Beta = number of filter rating and larger size particles in dirty fluid divided by number of those particles in clean fluid.

• Beta = 1000/1 = 1000 or 99.99% clean

8/25/2015 19 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Filters - Operational

• Filters work better at removing solids as they collect solids – bed filtration is very effective.

• The filtration efficiency (both size and quantity removed) improve with use.

• Pressure drop increases with use and is a measure of filter life.

8/25/2015 20 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Cartridge Filter Pods

• Have two sets of cartridge filter pods – operate on one while changing filters in the other.

• Set a pressure drop standard to change the filter – depends on cartridge type and pod type.

• Watch dirty fluid discharge – not into the well.

8/25/2015 21 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Pressure

drop

through the

filters Dirty fluid inlet

Clean fluid

Pod filter schematic – up to 36 filter

cartridges in any pod. Socks also used in

place of filters, but filtration quality may

be affected.

8/25/2015 22 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Question – when cartridges are removed during a

change out, where does the dirty fluid in the pod

housing and the sediment at the bottom go?

?

Directly into the clean fluids tank!

8/25/2015 23 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Q/A item: Equip the pod with a wash-out drain to clean

sediment before changing cartridges.

8/25/2015 24 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Filtration

• Filtration removes solids to prevent build up of solids and helps prevent plugging in the formation.

• Two basic filtration systems are employed:

– cartridges (nominal or absolute)

– filter presses (Plate and Frame or Pressure Leaf)

8/25/2015 25 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Particulate Damage

• Unintended particulates - “dirty fluids” – filter fluids to 5 microns at Beta of 1000

– maximum NTU of 30, preferable is 20

– clean tanks, lines - how about tubulars?

• Particles in fluid loss pills – mixed in proper range for perm encountered?

– Will it come off formation? Can it come back thru pack? Thru screen? What about removal?

8/25/2015 26 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Filtration and Fluids

• NTU - a turbidity indicator - can be mislead by natural color of water.

• Nominal filter rating - estimate of the size of particle removed - don’t trust it.

• Absolute filter rating - size of the holes in the filter - will change with bed buildup

• Beta rating - a ratio of particles before filtration to after. A good measure of filter efficiency.

8/25/2015 27 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Risks and Issues

• Filtration can impact pump rate of completion fluids

• Filtration may be unnecessary cost in some wells, but should be assessed on a well-by-well basis (from potential damage mechanisms

• Filter presses have the advantage of high solids tolerance and throughput - units are large but cheap to operate.

• Cartridges used for small volumes of relatively clean material - smaller throughputs and less tolerance to dirty fluids, generally cartridges are more expensive

• Can be health and environmental risks associated with operating and disposing of filtration medium.

8/25/2015 28 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Risks and Issues

• NTU (a light transmission test) measurements rely solely on the “cloudiness” of the fluids, corrosion products in return fluids give high values, NTU and solids content are not directly related. Solids content will only assess materials collected at the bottom of the test tube during centrifuging.

• Coloured water will give higher NTU values.

• Using sample sizes of a few mls, it is difficult to draw conclusions about a well with an annular volume of 500 bbl, 0.1% vol/vol solids equates to +/- 1 cuft of solids deposited for

tubing contents of 200 bbl.

8/25/2015 29 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Determination of Well Cleanliness

• The determination of how clean the well is usually based on the cleanliness of fluids returning from the wellbore. The most common measures are normal turbidity units (NTU) and solids content, neither relate to what is left in the well.

• Junk baskets, gauge rings and the SPS WellPatroller do give some positive indication of solids removal.

• Other indicators of a clean well are torque and drag (related to the friction coefficient of fluid coating the casing walls) and cleanliness of the clean up string when pulled.

8/25/2015 30 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Determination of Well Cleanliness

• The determination of how clean the well is usually based on the cleanliness of fluids returning from the wellbore. The most common measures are normal turbidity units (NTU) and solids content, neither relate to what is left in the well.

• Junk baskets, gauge rings and the SPS WellPatroller do give some positive indication of solids removal.

• Other indicators of a clean well are torque and drag (related to the friction coefficient of fluid coating the casing walls) and cleanliness of the clean up string when pulled.

8/25/2015 31 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Learnings

1. Cartridge units are not usually appropriate for dirty or viscosified fluids

2. DE press materials require good HSE control

3. Tendency is to over-specify filtration requirements.

4. Don’t filter oil with a DE press.

5. Filtration less required when underbalance perforating(?)

6. Kill pills are usually not filtered

7. Absolute cartridge filters are 2-5 times cost of nominal

8/25/2015 32 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Best Practices

• For general applications, coarse filtration to 80 microns is all that should be considered when fluids do not penetrate the formation

• When a fluid penetrates the formation, filtration is more likely to be required. Filtration should be tailored to the pore throat size of the formation. A simple guide to setting a specification is 14% (1/7th) of the average pore throat diameter

• Filtration below 2 microns is usually impractical

• Always use a guard filter downstream of a DE press

• For a DE press filtration, rate is approximately 1 bpm per 100 sqft for sea water and 0.5 bpm per 100 sqft for a brine

8/25/2015 33

George E. King Engineering GEKEngineering.com

Best Practices, Pt 2

• A solids content of about 0.05% determined by an electric centrifuge is acceptable for most operations. For gravel packing this should be reduced to 0.02%.

• To determine solids content the standard tubes for sand content for the centrifuge are not usually appropriate, centrifuge tubes with more accurate calibrations should be obtained.

• NTU values should be used to track clean up with regular samples taken for analysis of solids content at a later date.

• A target value of 50 NTU above surface pits should be used.

• For critical wells e.g. high angle wells/where milling has occurred/previous problems with debris, a circulating junk basket (e.g., the SPS WellPatroller is recommended).

8/25/2015 34 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Best Practices, Pt 3

• Where the string is rotated during clean up the increase in torque can be used as an indicator, the coefficient of friction in sea water/brine is more than twice that of OBM.

• Visual inspection of the clean up string, if it is mud free and water wet mud displacement has been successful, if the string is mud coated run a gauge ring/junk basket or SPS WellPatroller.

• For critical application (e.g. gravel pack) use particle size analysers on location, laser particle size systems are recommended.

8/25/2015 35 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Measurement Learnings

• To deal with rust color (or precipitation) interference with NTU readings, add a small amount of HCl after the first reading and re-measure.

• If the junk basket is full, rerun.

8/25/2015 36 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Filtration Considerations

• Very clean fluids have high leakoff rates

• Fluids with properly blended fluid loss control materials added after filtration have a better chance of cleanup than with the initial particles in the fluid. Particles must be sized to stop at the face of the formation.

• All gelled fluids should be sheared and filtered – even the liquid polymer fluids.

8/25/2015 37 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Sizing of Filters

• Methods to determine size of pore throats: – Kozeny

– Coberly

– Scanning Electron Microscope

Comments from Ken Troupe of Baker

8/25/2015 38 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Pore Throat Size- Kozeny

• d= ( D50 )/ (3(1- )) 0.128 (k/)1/2

• where:

d = avg pore throat diam (m)

D50 = avg formation grain diameter (m)

= porosity (fraction)

k = absolute permeability (md)

8/25/2015 39 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Pore Throat Size - Coberly

• d = D50 / 6.5

• where:

d = average pore throat diameter (m)

D50 = avg formation grain diameter (m)

8/25/2015 40 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

SEM – Pore Throats

• In addition to other methods, pore size openings can be physically measured by looking at a formation sample with a scanning electron microscope.

• Avg pore size determined statistically.

8/25/2015 41 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

SEM – Rules of Thumb

If Dp < d, bridging occurs

If d/7 <Dp < d/3, shallow invasion (worst case)

If Dp < d/7, deep invasion (desirable??)

where:

Dp = diameter of particle (m)

d = average pore throat diameter (m)

8/25/2015 42 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Particles in the Fluid

• Solids from tanks, lines and fluids

• Severe problem, but often ignored

8/25/2015 43 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Filter Example for a Specific Formation

k = 2000 md and = 22%:

d = 0.128 (2000/0.22)1/2 = 12.2 m

Dp = 12.2 / 7 = 1.7 m

Dp = 1.7 m

Minimum filtration requirement = 2 m

8/25/2015 44

George E. King Engineering GEKEngineering.com

Example

k = 200 md and = 22%:

d = 0.128 (200/0.22)1/2 = 3.9 m

Dp = 3.9 / 7 = 0.55 m

Dp = 0.55 m

Filter = ? = low as possible, probably a 1 to 2 micron with a beta of >1000 – Note – this will be very difficult to achieve – instead, look at beta rating =1000 and 3 to 5 micron.

8/25/2015 45 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Beta Rating

• Beta = number of filter rating and larger size particles in dirty fluid divided by number of those particles in clean fluid.

• Beta = 1000/1 = 1000 or 99.99% clean

8/25/2015 46 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Saucier Method (SPE 4030)

Impairment versus Sand Size Ratio

If (D50/dp50) < 6, surface bridging occurs

If 6 < (D50/dp50) < 6, shallow invasion

If (D50/dp50) > 18, deep invasion occurs

where:

D50 = mean formation grain diameter

dp50 = mean particle diameter

8/25/2015 47 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Saucier

• Based on Saucier, the largest particle size in our completion fluid should be less than D50/18,

• This correlation indicates a much less stringent filtration requirement than Kozeny's or Coberly's method.

8/25/2015 48 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Saucier Formation Example

D50 = 105 micron (control w/ 20/40 Mesh gravel)

Dp = 105/18 = 5.8 m

Minimum filtration requirement = 6 m

8/25/2015 49 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Saucier Formation Example

D50 = 60 micron(control w/ 40/60 mesh gravel

Dp = 60/18 = 3.3 m

Minimum filtration requirement = 3 m

8/25/2015 50 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Polymer Damage

• From: muds, pills, frac, carriers

• Stable? - for years

• location - depends on form polymer was in

– dispersed properly - surface to deep in formation

– in pills and mass - right in perfs

8/25/2015 51 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Tank/Pit Cleaning

• Use pit washing tools to speed up pit cleaning, reduce pit entry and waste volumes.

• Draft plan including pumping schedules and pit requirements, discuss at toolbox talk with all relevant parties

• Check pit isolation valves to reduce risk of U-tube contamination

8/25/2015 52 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Areas to Clean:

1. Tanks used for clean fluid and pumping

2. Blender or cement unit and piping to rig floor

3. Kill line

4. Choke and rig floor manifolds

5. Pump bleed over line to pits

6. Shaker area (header box) and sample point

7. Stand pipe and back pressure manifold

8. Degasser tank and unit

9. Reverse lines

10.Flowline where accessible

11.Mixing system

12.Trip Tank

13.Drain lines and drip pans

8/25/2015 53 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Performance Best Practices

• A brine returns with an NTU < 30 above value of fluid in pits is excellent performance

• Clean returns after circulating < 150% of hole volume is good performance

• Interface volumes between pills of <20 bbl is excellent performance

8/25/2015 54 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Risks and Issues

• Filter presses use beds of diatomaceous earth (DE) or perlite, – they have the advantage of high solids tolerance and throughput, units

are large but cheap to operate.

– Cartridges should be used where small low volumes of relatively clean material have to be processed. They have smaller throughputs than and less tolerance to dirty fluids. Cartridges are typically more expensive

• There may be HSE risks associated with operating and disposing of filtration medium (dust, chemical residue, etc.).

8/25/2015 55 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Learnings

• Single stage cartridges not appropriate for very dirty or some viscosified fluids

• DE presses present HSE issues.

• Tendency is to over specify filtration specs.

• Do not filter oil with DE.

• If underbalanced perforation is planned, is filtration required?

• Filter kill pills? (solids range more important).

• Absolute cartridges are 2 to 5 x Nominal cost

8/25/2015 56 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Best Practices

• For general applications, coarse filtration to 80 microns is all that should be considered when fluids do not penetrate the formation

• When a fluid penetrates the formation filtration is more likely to be required, it should be tailored to the pore throat size of the formation.

– A simple guide to setting a specification is 14% (1/7th) of the average pore throat diameter

8/25/2015 57 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Best Practices

• Filtration below 2 microns is usually impractical in well operations

• Always use a guard filter downstream of a DE press

• For a DE press filtration rate is approximately 1 bpm per 100 sqft for sea water and 0.5 bpm per 100 sqft for a brine

8/25/2015 58 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

How Clean?

• The determination of how clean the well is usually based on the cleanliness of fluids returning from the wellbore.

• The most common measures are normal turbidity units (NTU) and solids content, neither relate to what is left in the well.

• Also: – junk baskets, gauge rings and recovery systems give some indication of

solids removal.

– torque and drag (related to the friction coefficient of fluid coating the casing walls) and

– cleanliness of the clean up string when pulled.

8/25/2015 59 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Filter Level

• Minimum filtration criteria

– particles passing through the filter need to be small enough to freely flow through the formation without plugging up the critical near wellbore area.

– filtering should achieve a maximum particle size in the completion fluid which is less than the pore diameter divided by 7.

8/25/2015 60 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Risks and Issues

• Measurement systems: – NTU: (a light transmission test) measurements rely solely on the “cloudiness”

of the fluids. NTU and solids content are not directly related. NTU is affected by color of water, stains, and surfactants. Common limits are 20 to 30 NTU.

– Centrifuging (grindouts/shakeouts) Solids content will only assess materials collected at the bottom of the test tube during centrifuging. These tests use the sample sizes of a few mls and it is difficult to draw conclusions about a well with an annular volume of 500 bbl, 0.1% vol/vol solids equates to +/- 1 cuft of solids deposited for tubing contents of 200 bbl.

8/25/2015 61 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Learning

• To deal with the problem of free rust (oxidation of free iron in water) impacting turbidity readings, a little acid (HCl) should be added after the initial reading.

• Oxidized fluids (at surface) will precipitate disolved ferrous iron.

• If the junk basket is pulled full it should be re-run.

8/25/2015 62 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Best Practices

• A solids content of >0.05% determined by an electric centrifuge is acceptable for most operations. For gravel packing this should be reduced to 0.02%

• To determine solids content the standard tubes for sand content for the centrifuge are not usually appropriate, centrifuge tubes with more accurate calibrations should be obtained

8/25/2015 63 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Best Practices

• NTU can be used to track clean up by regular sampling and later analysis of solids content.

• NTU from the well should be no more than 50 above the source.

• For critical wells e.g. high angle wells/where milling has occurred/previous problems with debris, baskets and debris recovery systems are needed.

8/25/2015 64 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Best Practices

• Where the string is rotated during clean up the increase in torque can be used as an indicator, the coefficient of friction in sea water/brine is more than twice that of OBM.

• Visual inspection of the clean up string, if it is mud free and water wet mud displacement has been successful, if the string is mud coated run a gauge ring/junk basket

• For critical application (e.g. gravel pack) particle size analysers on location may be useful.

8/25/2015 65 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Completion Fluid - Checklist

• Is the formation liquid sensitive to liquid relative permeability effects?

• Compatability with formation? (clay and minerals)

• Compatability with formation fluid? (emulsion, sludge, foam, froth)

• Tanks and surface equipment clean?(pumps, lines, hoses, blenders)

• Are polymers breakable? How is breaker added?

• Polymers, hydrated, sheared and filtered? Filter level? Beta rating?

• Minimize the pipe dope?

• Corrosion reactions understood?

• Erosion potential understood?

8/25/2015 66 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Unwanted Foams

• Foam is an emulsion where gas is the internal phase (mist is an emulsion with gas as external phase).

• Foaming conditions – some oils (ppm conc. of C6-C9organic acids and alcohols)

– diesel - (particularly bad and varies from lot to lot)

– some acid additives (emulsifiers, salts, inhibitors)

– XCD polymers (and others)

• Look for and destroy the stabilizer to break the foam.

8/25/2015 67 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Filtration and Cleaning

• Brine and ? (tanks, lines, pumps, etc.)

• Pickle the tubulars?

• NTU or particle count as a measure? How clean is clean? = Avg pore throat x 0.2?

• Beta rating and micron rating important

• Tank arrangement when filtering (from dirty tank to clean, not in a loop)

• Filter type – DE or Cartridge (no resin coated cartridges)

8/25/2015 68 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Filtration Ratings

• NTU - a turbidity indicator - can be mislead by natural color of water. An NTU of 20 to 30 is generally clean.

• Nominal filter rating - estimate of the size of particle removed - don’t trust it. Filtration efficiency improves with bed build-up

• Absolute filter rating - size of the holes in the filter. Filtration efficiency improves with bed build-up

• Beta rating - a ratio of particles before filtration to after. A good measure of filter efficiency.

• Suggestion – use a 5 to 10 micron rating with a beta rating of 1000 for most clear brine applications.

8/25/2015 69 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Beta Rating

• Beta = number of filter rating and larger size particles in dirty fluid divided by number of those particles in clean fluid.

• Beta = 1000/1 = 1000 or 99.99% clean

8/25/2015 70 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Equipment Risks and Issues

• Equipment failure may result in additional junk or a stuck clean up string, (not a common problem.

• There have been instances with casing scrapers and brushes where the clean out tool has introduced junk to the hole when these are not of a single piece construction or have retaining mechanisms for blocks.

• Circulating subs (particularly hydraulically operated) carry some risk associated with failing to close thus losing the ability to circulate to the bottom of the well.

• Some of the equipment is only available from niche / specialist suppliers which carries risks around QA/QC and tool availability.

• There is concern with running well clean up tools with minimum by pass area pushing large pieces of junk ahead and into CIV/FIV tools

8/25/2015 71 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Equipment Learnings

• Conventional casing scrapers with spring actuated blocks have failed leaving junk in the hole or even a stuck tool.

• Conventional scrapers are not built for extended rotation or drilling. Scrapers work in reciprocation.

• Failure rate of multifunction ball opening circulating subs has been high in some regions.

8/25/2015 72 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Equipment Learnings

• Weight actuated tools rely on maintaining weight set down on the tool to maintain the circulation path (all circulation is at one point). These tools should be run with the clutch option allowing drillpipe to be rotated independently of the pipe inside the liner. (Rotation assists cleanout)

• Recent experience with the SPS WellPatroller highlighted it is very effective at removing gunk and solids debris, this tool provides a level of assurance not available with any of the other tools (including conventional junk subs).

8/25/2015 73 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Best Practices and Design

• Casing scrapers should create maximum contact with ID of casing, be a one piece design with full drill pipe strength and no weak internal connections.

• Casing scrapers should enable rotation at rates up to 50 rpm, these should be of a design so that blocks are either retained in the body of the scraper. (UWG/Global) or are an integral design (SPS Razorback).

• The preferred circulating sub should be of the type utilising weight set down to function, with a clutch mechanism. If a reliable hydraulic tool is developed this may become preferable as it allows reciprocation with circulation.

• For clean out strings in high angle cased well a WellPatroller should be run (or if concern about debris or junk in the well).

• Casing brushes are not considered necessary if an effective scraper is selected. If a brush is used it should be redressed after each application.

8/25/2015 74 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Surface Learnings

• Use pit washing tools to speed up pit cleaning, reduce pit entry and waste volumes.

• Plan pumping schedules and pit requirements,

• Check pit isolation valves to reduce risk of U-tube contamination

• Focus clean up work from flow line/shakers through to the pits.

8/25/2015 75 George E. King Engineering

GEKEngineering.com

Surface Learnings – Check Areas

• 1. All pits to be used for clean fluid and pumping

• 2. Cement unit to rig floor

• 3. Kill line

• 4. Choke and rig floor manifolds

• 5. Pump bleed over line to pits

• 6. Shaker area (header box) and sample point

• 7. Stand pipe and back pressure manifold

• 8. Degasser tank and unit

• 9. Reverse lines

• 10. Flowline where accessible

• 11. Mixing system

• 12. Trip Tank

• 13. Drain lines and drip pans

8/25/2015 76

George E. King Engineering GEKEngineering.com