Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LD 5i!55 411.r;1 ~sg3
19?9 {!_ _J..,
Vi .. C
trglllla • ooperative
Extension Tobacco
Flue-Cured Tobacco Variety Information for 2000
C. A. Wilkinson, T. D. Reed, C. S. Johnson, and J. L. Jones*
Seed of five new varieties will be available to tobacco producers in 2000. OX 414 NF and Sp. G-179 met the chemical and physical standards established by the Regional Variety Evaluation Committee in 1997. Both raw and pelleted seed of these two varieties will be available. RG H51, PVH03, and PVH09 met the standards in 1998, are male sterile hybrids, and only pelleted seed will be available. Information on parents used to develop a hybrid is not released. All five new varieties are resistant to the common races of the root knot nematode. OX 414 NF, Sp. G-179, and RG H51 are susceptible to tobacco mosaic virus whereas PVH03 and PVH09 are resistant to tobacco mosaic virus. Growers should consider planting a limited acreage of any new variety until more information and experience is available from a wider range of soil and climatic conditions.
OX 414 NF (tested as OX 4142 NF) was developed by North Carolina State University from a cross of NC 37 NF x K 346. Seed will be available from RG Seed Company. OX 414 NF is a non-flowering variety whose yield is similar to NC 27 NF and greater than NC 37 NF. It has a moderate level of resistance to black shank and a low level of resistance to Granville wilt.
Sp. G-179 (tested as Speight 179) was developed by Speight Seed Farms from a cross of Coker 371 Gold x Sp. G-28. Sp. G-179 has a field type similar to Sp. G-28. It has a very high level of resistance to black shank and a high level of resistance to Granville wilt.
RG HSI (tested as RGSH-17) was developed by RG Seed Company. Seed will be available from F. W. Rickard Seed Company. RG H51 is a moderate yielding hybrid with good quality. It has a very high level of resistance to black shank and a low level of resistance to Granville wilt.
PVH03 (tested· as PVH03) and PVH09 (tested as PVH09) were developed by Profigen Inc. Seed will be produced and marketed by F. W. Rickard Seed Co. under the RG Seed Co. label. Both are moderate yielding. PVH03 has a low level of resistance to black shank and Granville wilt. PVH09 has a low level of resistance to black shank and a high level of resistance to Granville wilt.
Information is provided for widely grown and recently released varieties in Tables 1 to 5 of this publication. Results of fourteen varieties included in the 1999 Virginia Official Variety Tests (OVT) are shown in Table 1. These tests were conducted in Charlotte (Jamie Newcomb), Halifax (Wayne Palmer), Pittsylvania (Kevin Motley), and Nottoway (Southern Piedmont Agricultural Research and Extension Center) counties under the joint supervision of Extension Agents in the respective counties and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University research and Extension personnel. Testing in various locations throughout the production area makes it possible to evaluate varietal performance under the widely ranging soil and weather conditions existing in Virginia. Such a testing program also provides an opportunity for producers to observe different varieties under field conditions in their particular region. Contact the Extension agent in your county to arrange a visit to the on-farm variety test nearest you and to learn of tours of tobacco on-farm tests.
Data in Table 1 are for only one year and the results may not be indicative of what might be obtained in other years. There was some differential leaf drop among varieties in 1996 due to Hurricane Fran~ therefore, yield data from 1996 needs to be interpreted cautiously. Where available,
continued on page 5
* Associate Professor of Agronomy; Extension Agronomist, Tobacco; Extension Plant Pathologist, Tobacco; and Extension Agronomist, Tobacco, respectively; Virginia Tech, Southern Piedmont Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Blackstone, VA.
v· .. ~Tech • VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE
AND STA TE UNNERSITY
Virginia Cooperative Extension programs aod employment are open to all, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, veteran status,
national origin, disability, or political affiliation. An equal opponuoity/affirmative action employer. Issued in funberaoce of
Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Instirute aod State University, Virginia State University, aod the U.S. Department
of Agriculture cooperating. J. David Barrett, Direcior, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg;
Lorenza W. Lyons, Administralor, 1890 Exiension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg.
VT/028/0 I 00/ I M/202108/436047 VIRGINIA STATE UNNERSITY
Tab
le 1
. V
irgi
nia
Flu
e-C
ured
Off
icia
l Var
iety
Tes
t Res
ults
: Y
ield
, Val
ue, P
rice
, and
Gra
de
Inde
x, 1
999.
1
So. P
iedm
ont
Cha
rlotte
H
alifa
x Pi
ttsyl
vani
a St
ate
Ave
rage
A
REC
Coun~
Coun~
Coun~
Yie
ld
Pric
e Y
ield
Pr
ice
Yie
ld
Pric
e Y
ield
Pr
ice
Yie
ld
Pric
e V
arie
ty
lbs/
A
$/cw
t lb
s/A
$/
cwt
lbs/
A
$/cw
t lb
s/A
$/
cwt
lbs/
A
$/cw
t K
326
2975
16
5 34
36
174
3402
15
5 24
56
164
2606
16
6 K
346
2688
16
8 31
41
164
3117
17
7 20
43
166
2452
16
3 K
394
2986
17
0 33
52
175
3360
16
6 25
84
168
2648
17
2 N
C 7
1 31
29
171
3784
17
5 32
98
175
2573
16
8 28
60
164
NC
72
2864
16
7 35
05
174
3289
15
6 23
56
162
2305
17
6 N
C 3
7NF
27
38
167
2941
17
5 30
08
174
2459
15
1 25
43
168
OX
207
2531
17
0 28
91
173
2706
17
4 18
44
162
2683
16
9 O
X4
14
NF
29
24
167
3538
17
0 33
04
176
2291
15
6 25
63
166
RG
81
2811
16
6 33
72
173
3142
15
8 21
56
167
2572
16
6 R
GH
4 27
06
171
3331
17
0 29
98
175
1969
17
2 25
26
165
RG
H5
1
2942
17
3 34
30
176
3377
17
7 24
36
169
2524
16
8 Sp
. G-1
68
2880
17
0 32
76
175
3000
17
3 21
48
168
3095
16
4 Sp
. G-1
72
2734
16
8 35
73
174
2918
16
3 21
30
162
2315
17
4 Sp
. NF3
24
76
171
2763
17
2 26
32
175
2017
17
0 24
92
167
Loc
atio
n A
vera
ge
2813
16
9 33
10
173
3111
17
0 22
47
165
2585
16
8
Val
ue
Gra
de
Val
ue
Gra
de
Val
ue
Gra
de
Val
ue
Gra
de
Val
ue
Gra
de
_$LA
_ In
dex
_$LA
_ In
dex
_$LA
_ In
dex
_$LA
_ In
dex
_$LA
_ Ir
ukx
-,-
--
K32
6 49
03
62
5969
67
52
80
54
4022
64
43
42
64
K34
6 45
18
55
5152
49
55
24
72
3389
52
40
06
46
K39
4 50
86
63
5853
69
55
80
57
4354
68
45
57
57
NC
71
5359
64
66
42
66
5770
70
43
21
68
4701
52
N
C72
47
82
62
6096
58
51
32
55
3845
66
40
53
68
NC
37N
F
4596
67
51
49
69
5244
72
37
23
62
4268
64
O
X20
7 43
07
63
4992
64
47
20
74
2988
53
45
28
60
OX
41
4N
F
4920
56
60
31
54
5786
66
35
92
50
4272
53
R
G81
46
78
60
5848
67
49
76
64
3602
54
42
84
56
RG
H4
4599
60
56
52
50
5242
76
33
41
58
4160
54
R
GH
51
50
88
68
6044
64
59
76
76
4055
71
42
78
62
Sp. G
-168
49
10
64
5755
66
51
86
65
3618
70
50
80
56
Sp. G
-172
46
15
62
6221
61
47
64
62
3458
57
40
15
66
Sp. N
F3
4226
65
47
40
70
4599
76
34
04
51
4160
63
N
ew v
arie
ties
for
200
0 ar
e in
bol
d.
1 T
ests
wer
e co
nduc
ted
in N
otto
way
(So.
Pie
dmon
t Ag.
Res
. and
Ext
. Ctr.
), C
harlo
tte (
Jam
ie N
ewco
mb)
, Hal
ifax
(Way
ne P
alm
er),
and
Pitts
ylva
nia
(Kev
in M
otle
y) c
ount
ies
in 1
999.
2
Gra
de i
ndex
is a
num
eric
al q
ualit
y ra
ting
base
d on
gov
ernm
ent g
rade
. H
igh
ratin
gs a
re b
est.
Tab
le 2
. V
irgi
nia
Flu
e-C
ured
Tob
acco
Off
icia
l Var
iety
Tes
t Res
ults
by
Yea
rs, S
outh
ern
Pie
dmon
t Agr
icul
tura
l R
esea
rch
and
Ext
ensi
on C
ente
r,
Bla
ckst
one,
VA
. Y
ield
, lb
s/ A
Va
lu~~
$LA
Pr
ice,
$/c
wt
Var
iety
19
95
1996
19
97
1998
19
99
Avg
.1 19
95
1996
19
97
1998
19
99
1995
19
96
1997
19
98
1999
C
371
Gol
d 30
93
2631
32
46
3765
30
63
3160
55
98
5044
57
31
6835
54
66
181
192
177
182
178
CU
263
3122
30
62
2852
36
12
3197
31
69
5679
58
75
5092
65
40
5503
18
2 19
2 17
9 18
1 17
2 K
149
33
19
2585
33
31
3124
30
19
3076
60
06
4957
59
62
5611
51
87
181
192
179
180
172
K32
6 35
36
3093
30
69
3754
34
36
3378
64
25
5935
55
26
6826
59
69
182
192
180
182
174
K34
6 32
77
2696
31
00
3250
31
41
3093
59
10
5172
54
87
5822
51
52
180
192
177
179
164
K35
8 32
72
3001
28
78
3280
32
00
3126
59
62
5757
51
55
5930
55
17
182
192
179
181
172
K39
4 35
79
3088
36
68
3439
33
52
3425
65
32
5923
65
84
6237
58
53
182
192
180
181
175
K 7
30
3197
29
19
2890
34
53
3491
31
90
5792
56
00
5198
62
68
5997
18
1 19
2 18
0 18
2 17
2 G
L93
9 33
19
3026
29
90
3141
33
92
3174
60
29
5802
52
82
5697
58
47
182
192
177
181
172
NC
27N
F
3755
33
78
3224
36
94
3740
35
58
6783
64
69
5746
67
18
6405
18
1 19
1 17
8 18
2 17
1 N
C37
NF
32
98
2900
30
96
3284
29
41
3104
59
72
5560
55
23
6001
51
49
181
192
178
183
175
NC
55
--
3077
33
55
3274
32
89
3249
59
00
6008
59
38
5716
-
192
179
181
174
NC
71
--
3202
32
21
3896
37
84
3526
-
-61
43
5737
70
67
6642
-
192
178
181
175
NC
72
--
--
3308
37
02
3505
35
05
--
--
5978
67
14
6096
-
-18
1 18
2 17
4 N
C72
9 35
38
2982
32
20
3061
27
86
3117
63
97
5720
57
57
5528
48
02
181
192
179
181
172
OX
207
--
2894
32
24
3300
28
91
3077
--
5554
57
83
5997
49
92
-19
2 17
9 18
2 17
3 O
X4
14
NF
--
--
--
3682
35
38
3610
--
--
--
6702
60
31
--
-18
2 17
0 O
X94
0 32
83
2581
32
85
3078
29
28
3031
59
15
4946
58
23
5535
49
66
180
192
177
180
170
PV
H0
3
--
--
--
--
3205
32
05
--
--
--
--
5580
-
--
-17
4 P
VH
09
--
--
--
--
3159
31
59
--
--
--
--
5213
-
--
-16
5 R
G 1
7 36
69
3138
32
51
3359
34
10
3365
66
23
6022
58
26
6082
58
96
180
192
179
181
173
RG
81
3947
30
90
3288
34
86
3372
34
37
7135
59
27
5917
63
51
5848
18
1 19
2 18
0 18
2 17
3 R
GH
4 36
67
2720
31
23
3357
33
31
3240
66
58
5215
55
70
6050
56
52
182
192
178
181
170
RG
H12
--
--
--
3162
34
22
3292
-
---
--
5737
58
01
--
--
--
182
170
RG
H5
1
--
--
--
--
3430
34
30
--
--
--
--
6044
-
--
-17
6 R
GH
61
--
2882
33
35
3460
30
96
3193
--
5531
60
01
6289
53
44
-19
2 18
0 18
2 17
2 Sp
. G-1
68
--
--
2909
34
53
3276
32
13
--
--
5227
62
91
5755
-
--
180
182
175
Sp. G
-172
--
--
3164
33
03
3573
33
47
--
--
5643
59
89
6221
-
-17
8 18
1 17
4 S
p. G
-179
--
--
--
3380
29
89
3184
--
--
--
6075
50
30
--
-18
0 16
9 Sp
. NF3
--
--
2890
29
21
2763
28
58
--
5178
52
48
4740
-
-17
9 18
0 17
2 V
A 1
16
3389
29
34
3341
34
33
3183
32
56
6138
56
30
5987
62
63
5537
18
2 19
2 17
9 18
3 17
4 Y
ear
Ave
rage
34
27
2947
31
70
3397
32
55 --
6209
56
52
5669
61
55
5611
18
1 19
2 17
9 18
1 17
2 N
ew v
arie
ties
for
200
0 ar
e in
bol
d.
1 A
vera
ges
are
not d
irect
ly c
ompa
rabl
e un
less
the
num
ber
of ye
ars
is eq
uiva
lent
.
Tab
le 3
. A
gron
omic
and
Dis
ease
Inf
orm
atio
n fo
r V
arie
ties
Tes
ted
at th
e S
outh
ern
Pie
dmon
t Agr
icul
tura
l Res
earc
h an
d E
xten
sion
Cen
ter,
B
lack
ston
e, V
A,
1999
. D
ays
Pla
nt
Gro
und
Gra
de
to
Hei
ght
Lea
f S
ucke
rs
., D
isea
se R
eact
ions
3
Var
iety
In
dex'
F
low
er
(in.)
N
o.
per
plot
2 I
BS
T
MV
R
K
GW
I
C 3
71 G
old
75
69
32.4
18
.9
0.3
I V
H
s s
M
CU
26
3
58
71
34.4
20
.3
0 L
s
R
L
K 1
49
71
71
32.3
20
.2
0 M
s
R
H
K3
26
67
71
32
.9
19.7
0
L
s R
L
K
34
6
49
70
34.0
19
.7
0.7
H
s R
H
K
35
8
65
71
34.1
19
.6
0.7
L
s R
M
K
39
4
69
70
32.9
19
.1
0 I
H
s s
L
K 7
30
59
70
33.6
19
.8
1.3
:1 L
s
R
M
GL
93
9
55
70
34.0
20
.2
0.3
I M
s
s H
N
C2
7N
F
NF
4 75
35
.2
20.l
0.
7 L
s
s L
N
C3
7N
F
NF4
75
36
.6
18.7
5.
0 L
s
R
L
NC
55
63
71
30.8
18
.7
0 L
s
R
L
NC
71
66
71
31
.9
20.1
0
I V
H
s R
M
N
C7
2
58
70
35.1
18
.8
0.7
I
VH
s
R
L
l N
C7
29
70
71
31
.0
19.2
0
L
s R
H
O
X2
07
64
72
33
.0
19.3
0
' H
s R
H
O
X4
14
NF
N
F4
73
35.6
19
.1
1.7
i M
s
R
L
OX
94
0
59
71
32.3
18
.5
1.3
I H
s s
M
PV
H0
3
67
70
33.5
19
.7
0 L
R
R
L
P
VH
09
52
70
35
.6
19.7
0
L
R
R
H
RG
17
63
71
32.1
20
.1
0 L
s
R
M
RG
81
67
70
32
.2
20.1
0
L
s R
L
R
GH
4
50
70
34.8
19
.3
0.7
M
R
R
H
RG
H1
2
59
70
35.1
18
.4
0 M
s
R
M
RG
H5
1
64
71
34.2
17
.7
1.3
I v::
s R
L
R
GH
61
69
71
34
.1
18.1
1.
7 s
R
L
Sp.
G-1
68
66
70
33.0
18
.5
1.3
i V
H
s R
H
I
Sp.
G-1
72
61
70
32.8
19
.4
0 ,~
s R
M
S
p. G
-179
55
71
32
.8
18.2
0
s R
H
Sp
. N
F3
NF4
75
36
.5
19.5
0.
3 I
H
s R
H
I
VA
116
71
70
35
.2
18.3
2.
3 .
M
s s
L
I
New
var
ieti
es f
or 2
000
are
in b
old.
1
Gra
de i
ndex
is a
num
eric
al q
uali
ty r
atin
g ba
sed
on g
over
nmen
t gra
de.
Hig
h ra
ting
s ar
e be
st.
2 G
roun
d su
cker
s/22
pla
nt p
lot.
3 D
isea
se r
eact
ion
-H
=hi
ghly
res
ista
nt;
M =
mod
erat
e; L
lo
w;
S =
susc
epti
ble;
R =
resi
stan
t; B
S=
bla
ck s
hank
; (V
H r
atin
gs a
re f
or R
ace
0 o
f P
hyto
phth
ora;
res
ista
nce
to R
ace
1 m
ay b
e co
nsid
erab
ly lo
wer
); T
MV
=to
bacc
o m
osai
c vi
rus;
RK
=R
oo
t Kno
t; G
W =
Gra
nvil
le W
ilt.
4 N
F =
non
flow
erin
g.
Pla
nts
shou
ld b
e to
pped
at 2
0 to
22
harv
esta
ble
leav
es.
I
Table 4. Percentage of certain color grade factors of varieties tested at four locations in 1999. Variety L,F K KR,FR v KF KV KM G,GK K326 34 45 0 0 3 4 14 0 K346 19 42 0 0 18 12 4 5 K394 25 30 19 0 5 4 16 1 NC71 36 38 0 0 4 4 12 6 NC72 37 31 0 3 6 1 22 0 NC37NF 41 46 0 0 4 0 7 2 OX207 30 46 0 0 12 6 3 3 OX414NF 24 31 0 0 24 7 9 5 RG81 41 36 0 0 12 4 2 5 RGH4 32 28 0 0 14 11 15 0 RGHSl 35 41 2 2 6 4 10 0 Sp. G-168 30 45 0 0 7 4 14 0 Sp. G-172 26 45 0 3 4 10 12 0 Sp.NF3 34 50 2 0 9 5 0 0 New varieties for 2000 are in bold. 1 L = lemon; F = orange; K = variegated; KR = variegated red; FR = orange red; V = greenish; KF = variegated orange; KV = variegated greenish; KM = variegated mixed; G = green; GK = green variegated.
Table 5. Harvest rate (cumulative percentage by harvest) as a measure of maturation patterns. 1
So. Piedmont AREC
Variety Hl H2 H3 H4 K 326 16 36 66 100 K 346 19 38 69 100 K 3 94 1 7 3 9 71 100 NC 71 13 31 56 100 NC 72 13 30 61 100 NC 37 NF 16 35 64 100 ox 207 13 31 61 100 OX 414 NF 14 31 56 100 RG 81 14 38 66 100 RGH4 16 35 68 100 RG H51 12 32 64 100 Sp. G-168 12 30 61 100 Sp. G-172 14 31 64 100 Sp. NF3 17 42 69 100 New varieties for 2000 are in bold.
Charlotte County
Hl H2 H3 H4 20 48 78 100 20 52 78 100 20 50 81 100 22 51 75 100 20 48 74 100 21 49 79 100 20 53 82 100 19 43 71 100 18 54 85 100 22 58 90 100 24 57 94 100 22 60 92 100 19 55 92 100 22 52 82 100
Halifax County
Hl H2 H3 12 38 100 12 41 100 15 43 100 15 44 100 15 44 100 16 41 100 14 30 100 15 27 100 14 35 100 14 76 100 12 41 100 16 44 100 12 34 100 10 30 100
Pittsylvania County
Hl H2 H3 10 26 100 10 23 100 10 26 100 10 23 100 11 26 100 11 26 100 10 23 100 8 23 100
10 25 100 12 26 100 8 28 100
10 24 100 9 30 100
12 27 100
1 Harvest date for each priming was determined by the appearance of the tobacco at each location. The tobacco produced and the rate of removal were influenced by individual management and local soil and water conditions. 11
continued from page 1
averages that include 1995 to 1999 data are also presented in Table 2.
Information on agronomic performance and disease resistance levels is given in Table 3. The use of disease resistant varieties is a very effective means of reducing losses due to certain diseases and nematodes. However, varietal resistance cannot be used alone. Any variety may suffer damage when nematodes and disease causing
organisms are present and when weather conditions favor their development. An effective pest management program will also include crop rotation (particularly with fescue and small grains) and other cultural control practices. Combining varietal resistance with crop rotation, early stalk and root destruction, and proper use of pesticides is the only way to achieve consistent, costeffective disease and nematode control.
Disclaimer Commercial products are named in this publication for information purposes only. Virginia Cooperative Extension and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University do not endorse these products and do not intend discrimination against other products which also may be suitable.
Virginia Cooperative Extension U.S. Department of Agriculture
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0512
BULK RATE POSTAGE & FEES PAID
USDA PERMIT NO. G268