3
Volume 71A, number 4 PHYSICS LETTERS 14 May 1979 FLUCTUATING FORCES IN PLASMADYNAMICS W. ROZMUS a and LA. TURSKI b, 1 a Institute of Nuclear Research, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland bin stitutes of Geophysics and Theoretical Physics, Warsaw University, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland Received 29 December 1978 Using the concept of the Vlasov—Landau—Langevin equation we discuss the structure of fluctuating forces a la Landau and Lifshitz in plasmadynamical equations for weakly coupled one component plasma. Explicit expressions for stress tensor and heat current vector components correlation functions are derived displaying non-markovian behaviour. The origin and structure of fluctuating forces added from the Chapman—Enskog in the derivation of the to the hydrodynamical equations by Landau and Lif- plasmadynamical equations from the kinetic equation. shitz [1] attract now a great deal of attention [2,31. This point was fully discussed by Baus [7]. From his These forces play an important role in various practical analysis (cf. also ref. [8]) it follows that correct plasma- applications for example in hydrodynamical instabil- dynamical equations for the OCP are non-local in time ities and turbulence phenomena [4,5]. i.e. have explicitly time dependent transport coefficients The microscopic derivation of the Landau and Lif- [8]. In ref. [8] we have derived these non-local equa- shitz expressions for the correlation functions of the tions, starting from the linearized Vlasov—Landau kinetic fluctuating forces was presented for the first time by equation, using the projection operators technique Bixon and Zwanzig [6]. They have used the so called combined with the Grad’s 13 moments expansion. The Boltzmann—Langevin equation and conventional Grad’s technique is being used here to study the predic- Chapman—Enskog procedure. tions of the Vlasov—Landau—Langevin equation written In this note we follow the line of arguments from below, where the Fourier transform with respect to ref. [61 in studying the nature of fluctuating forces ~ space variables was performed, plasmadynamical equations describing the long-wave- - - - a~h(k,u,t)+ik.uh(kv t)+V(h)—c(h) length evolution of a one component weakly coupled k plasma OCP. To the best of our knowledge this has not = F(k, ~, t~ - (1) been discussed in the literature. The essential difference between the long-wavelength In the above h(k, u, t) is the dimensionless deviation of behaviour of the OCP and that of neutral systems stems the exact one.particle distribution function from its from the fact that the OCP supports the fast mode of equilibrium value ~fB (lB being the Boltzmann distribu- excitations (plasma mode) down to the zero-wave vec- tion and n the mean particle density) ~k and C stand tor. This renders applications of conventional kinetic for linearized Vlasov and Landau collision operators, theory concepts like the local equilibrium distribution respectively. Notice that in contrast to the neutral par- invalid and forces us to adopt a procedure different tide case the operator ~‘k= Vk C contains singular k-dependence in its Vlasov term. This leads to the exis- 1 tence of the fast mode at k = 0. Research supported in part by the Polish Ministry of Science Higher Education and Technology Grant No. MR.1.7 and by The F(k, u, t) on the RHS of eq. (1) represents the the grant from National Bureau of Standards made available fluctuating source added here in accord with ideas of via the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Foundation. ref. [6]. Since the whole operator on the LHS of eq. (1) 344

Fluctuating forces in plasmadynamics

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Fluctuating forces in plasmadynamics

Volume71A, number4 PHYSICSLETTERS 14 May 1979

FLUCTUATING FORCES IN PLASMADYNAMICS

W. ROZMUS a andLA. TURSKI b, 1aInstituteof NuclearResearch,00-681 Warsaw,Polandbinstitutesof GeophysicsandTheoreticalPhysics,WarsawUniversity, 00-681 Warsaw,Poland

Received29 December1978

Using theconceptof theVlasov—Landau—Langevinequationwe discussthestructureoffluctuating forcesa la LandauandLifshitz in plasmadynamicalequationsfor weakly coupledonecomponentplasma.Explicit expressionsfor stresstensorandheatcurrentvectorcomponentscorrelationfunctionsarederiveddisplayingnon-markovianbehaviour.

The origin andstructureof fluctuating forcesadded from the Chapman—Enskogin the derivationof theto thehydrodynamicalequationsby LandauandLif- plasmadynamicalequationsfrom the kinetic equation.shitz [1] attractnow a greatdealof attention[2,31. Thispointwas fully discussedby Baus [7]. FromhisTheseforcesplay an importantrole in variouspractical analysis(cf. also ref. [8]) it follows that correctplasma-applicationsfor examplein hydrodynamicalinstabil- dynamicalequationsfor the OCPare non-localin timeitiesandturbulencephenomena[4,5]. i.e. haveexplicitly time dependenttransportcoefficients

Themicroscopicderivationof the LandauandLif- [8]. In ref. [8] we havederivedthesenon-localequa-shitzexpressionsfor the correlationfunctionsof the tions,startingfrom the linearizedVlasov—Landaukineticfluctuatingforceswaspresentedfor the first timeby equation,usingthe projectionoperatorstechniqueBixon andZwanzig[6]. Theyhaveusedthe socalled combinedwith the Grad’s 13 momentsexpansion.TheBoltzmann—Langevinequationandconventional Grad’stechniqueis beingusedhere to studythepredic-Chapman—Enskogprocedure. tionsof the Vlasov—Landau—Langevinequationwritten

In this notewe follow the line of argumentsfrom below,wherethe Fourier transformwith respecttoref. [61 in studyingthe natureof fluctuatingforces~ spacevariableswas performed,plasmadynamicalequationsdescribingthe long-wave- - -

- a~h(k,u,t)+ik.uh(kvt)+V(h)—c(h)lengthevolutionof a onecomponentweakly coupled kplasmaOCP.To thebestof our knowledgethis hasnot = F(k, ~, t~- (1)

beendiscussedin the literature.The essentialdifferencebetweenthelong-wavelength In theaboveh(k,u, t) is the dimensionlessdeviationof

behaviourof the OCP and thatof neutralsystemsstems the exactone.particledistribution functionfrom itsfrom thefact that the OCP supportsthe fastmodeof equilibrium value~fB (lB beingthe Boltzmanndistribu-excitations(plasmamode)down to thezero-wavevec- tion andn themeanparticledensity)~k andC standtor. This rendersapplicationsof conventionalkinetic for linearizedVlasovandLandaucollision operators,theoryconcepts— like the local equilibriumdistribution respectively.Notice that in contrastto the neutralpar-— invalid and forcesusto adopta proceduredifferent tide casethe operator~‘k= Vk C containssingular

k-dependencein its Vlasov term.This leadsto the exis-1 tenceof thefast modeat k = 0.

Researchsupportedin partby the Polish Ministry of ScienceHigherEducationandTechnologyGrantNo. MR.1.7 andby The F(k, u, t) on the RHSof eq.(1) representsthethegrantfrom NationalBureauof Standardsmadeavailable fluctuatingsourceaddedhere in accordwith ideasofvia theMaria Sklodowska-CurieFoundation. ref. [6]. Since thewhole operatoron the LHS of eq.(1)

344

Page 2: Fluctuating forces in plasmadynamics

VolumehA, number4 PHYSICSLETTERS 14 May 1979

is local in time, then recallingbasicpropertiesof the We adoptheretheGrad’s 13 momentstechnique.InMon formulationvia which eq.(1) canpresumablybe practicethis meansthat we haveto insertunit opera-justifiedoneconcludesthat the randomsourceFhasto torsspannedby the Hermitepolynomialsin thevelocitybe deltacorrelatedin time, i.e. space,betweenall the operatorsoccurringin eq.(4)

andthenrestrictthenumberof allowedpolynomials(F(k1,U1, t1) F(k2,~2’ r2)) to thefirst 13. To completecalculationswe also need

= E(k1,u1 k2,u2) 6(t1 — t2), (2) eigenfunctionsandeigenvaluesof theL-operator.Itsufficesto calculatethemby perturbationandwith

whereC..) denotesaveragingoverthe initial equilibrium accuracyup to thesquareof the wavevectork. Theensemble, resultingexpressionsfor correlationfunctionsbetween

The apriori unknowncoefficientE canbeinferred variouscomponentsof the stresstensorP,1 andfrom the requirementthat thevelocity-spacecorrelation betweencomponentsof theheatcurrentvector arefunction written belowdisplayingclearlynon-markovian

character:C’(k1,u1,t1k2,o2’ t2) = (h(k1,u1,t1)h(k2,u2,t2))be timetranslationinvariant.E is givenentirelyin terms <~i1(”i,ti)Pim(k2, t2)) = kBTh(kl+ k2)of equilibriumcorrelation functions.Assumingfor thelattera lowest order approximationwithrespectto the X(&iit

5jm +6im6jl_(2I3)~5ijt5lm)plasma-parameterwe obtain x {O(t

1 — r2)fl(t1 — t2)+ o~(t2— t1) ~(t2 — t1)} , (5)

E(k uk u)1’ 1 2’ 2 (q1(k1,t1)qJ(k2,t2))k~T26(k

1+k2)61J

= —2C(ul)(nfB(u2))’ 6(u1 — u2) 6(k1+ k2). (3)x {8(t1—t2)K(t1—t2)+0(t2—r1)K(t2—r1)} . (6)

Havingthis, onecanwrite down the formalexpressionfor the correlationfunction C. Fourier transformingin Here8(t) is thestep functionand~(t) andic(t) aretimetimewe have dependentshearviscosityandthermalconductivity,

respectively.Both thesequantitieswereevaluatedin2irC(k u1,w1k2,u2,w.,)

1 ref. [8] andare expressedin termsof matrix elements= 6(k1 +k2)6(~o1+ w2)(—iw1 +L1)~ of the operatorC(u) in the nonhydrodynamicalpart

i of the Gradbasis.Explicitly we haveX(iw2 +L~)— E(k1u1k2,u2). (4)

In theaboveLa = ik Da — ~k and * denotescomplex ~(t) = nkB T exp(—C1t),conjugation. ,c(t) = nkBT

2(5/2m)exp(—C2t), (7)

It is possiblenow to checkthat thedynamicalstructurefactorS(k,w) obtainedfrom eq.(4) after wherethe velocity spaceintegrationfulfills two first mo- ~~/1 1

- C1 —(IOir ‘ ) w,,~ln~g) C2=(2/3)C1,mentsrelationsfor OCPas it should.

The fluctuatingforcesin theplasmadynamical and is the plasmafrequencyandg is the plasmaequationsare recognizedasusual asthe divergences parameter(g ~ 1).of fluctuatingpartsof thestresstensor andthe Eqs. (5) and(6) are our main result.Theytell usheatcurrentvector~ Thesefluctuating partsare thateventhougheq.(1) was clearlymarkovianthelinear functionalsof the distributionh(k,u, t) thus fluctuatingforcesin plasmadynamicalequationsaretheir correspondingcorrelationfunctionsare expressed non-markovian.This is in accordwith thefact thatentirelyin termsof Cfrom eq.(4). Thishowever plasmadynamicalequationsareby itself non-localinrequiresexplicit evaluationof the inverseoperators time andthat simpleminded“localization” of theseoccurringin eq.(4). In the processof doingso, due equationsis inconsistent[7,8]. Forneutralparticlesto thereasonsoutlinedin theintroductorypart,we onecanevaluatecorrelationfunctionslike eqs.(5)haveto departfrom the argumentationof ref. [6]. and(6) also usingthe Grad’s 13 momentsmethod.

345

Page 3: Fluctuating forces in plasmadynamics

Volume71A, number4 PHYSICSLETTERS 14 May 1979

Now the localizationof thetransportcoefficientsis in hydrodynamicsandthepossibility of regardingthepossibleresultingin replacementof the curly brackets non-hydrodynamicalpart of the initial value for thein eqs.(5), (6) by 26(t1—t2) timestransportcoefficient, linearizedkinetic equationas randomquantity.WehopeTheseareoriginal LandauandLifshitz formulae(cf. to returnto theseproblemsin a separatepublication.also ref. [3]).

It is possibleto understandeqs.(5), (6) on thebasis Referencesof theMon formulation.Indeed,we know from thisgeneraltheorythat the correlationfunction of the [11L.D. LandauandE.M. Lifshitz, Soy.Phys.JETP 32

generalizedLangevinforcesoccurring in the Mon equa- (1957)618.tionhaveto be equal(modulostaticcorrelationfac- [2] K.T. MashiyamaandH. Mori, J. Stat.Phys.18 (1978)385.

tors)to the memoryfunctionappearingin thesame [3] C.P.Enzand L.A. Turski, submittedfor publication.[4] For a reviewcf. H. Haken,Synergetics(Springer,Berlin,equation.Adding the fluctuatingforcesto theplasma- 1977).

dynamicalequationsfrom ref. [8] it is easyto seethat [5] S.A. Orszag,in: Fluid dynamics,ed.R. Balian(Gordon

this is really thecase,i.e. the correlationfunctionseqs. and Breach,New York, 1973),LesHouchesproceedings.

(5), (6) determinethememoryfunctionsin ref. [8]. [6] M. Bixon and R.W.Zwanzig,Phys.Rev. 187 (1969)267.

We haveconcludedthatonecanmakemuchmore [7] M. Baus,Physica79A (1975)377.[8] W. Rozmus,submittedfor publicationin J. PlasmaPhys.

generalstatementsconcerningthenatureof fluctuating (1979).

forcesin hydrodynamicalequations,memoryfunctions

346