Florida Suit

-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Tampa Division

UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. LAKELAND EYE CLINIC, P.A., Defendant.

: : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case No.:

PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSIONS COMPLAINT

This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to correct unlawful

employment practices on the basis of sex and to provide appropriate relief to Brandi M.

Branson (Branson) who was adversely affected by such practices. As alleged with greater

particularly below, Defendant Lakeland Eye Clinic, P.A. (Lakeland or Defendant)

terminated Branson, a transgender woman, because of sex.

AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 451, 1331,

1337, 1343 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Sections 706(f)(1)

and (f)(3) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1)

and (f)(3) (Title VII) and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981a.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 1 Filed 09/25/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1

-2-

2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were committed within the

jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa

Division.

3. Plaintiff United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC

or the Commission) is the agency of the United States of America charged with the

administration, interpretation, and enforcement of Title VII, and is expressly authorized to

bring this action by Sections 706(f)(1) and (f)(3) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1) and

(f)(3).

PARTIES

4. At all relevant times, Defendant has been a Florida professional corporation

doing business in the State of Florida and has continuously had at least 15 employees.

5. At all relevant times, Defendant has continuously been an employer engaged

in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701(b), (g) and (h) of Title

VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e(b), (g) and (h).

6. At all relevant times, Branson was an employee within the meaning of Section

701 of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e(f).

7. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Branson filed a

charge of discrimination with the Commission alleging violations of Title VII by Defendant.

CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

8. The Commission conducted an investigation of Bransons charge, and on or

about March 31, 2014, issued a Letter of Determination, finding reasonable cause to believe

that Branson was discriminatorily terminated because of sex, in violation of Title VII.


-3-

9. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled.

10. Lakeland Eye Clinic employs seven physicians who perform refractive,

corneal, and cataract surgery and treat retinal diseases. It is owned by Dr. Kevin Dorsett, an

ophthalmologist.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

11. In or about early 2010, Defendant decided to add a hearing division to the eye

clinic. Defendant hired Physicians Hearing Services, Inc. (PHSI), a staffing company that

specialized in hearing services, to provide candidates for the position of Director of Hearing

Services. PHSI recommended Branson for the position based on Bransons extensive

experience in the field of hearing aid sales in Florida.

12. On or about July 6, 2010, Defendant interviewed and hired Branson as

Director of Hearing Services. At the time of hire, Branson presented as male (e.g., used the

male name Michael, wore male attire, and otherwise appeared to conform to traditional

male gender norms).

13. Branson provided hearing services to patients who were referred to him by

Defendants physicians, and these referrals were Bransons only source of patients.

14. Branson performed the duties of his position successfully.

15. In or about late February 2011, Branson began wearing feminine attire to

work, including make-up and womens tailored clothing. Branson observed that co-workers

snickered, rolled their eyes, and withdrew from social interactions with her in response to her

changing appearance.


-4-

16. In or about April 2011, Defendant requested a meeting with Branson, wherein

Defendant confronted Branson about her changing appearance. Branson then informed

Defendant that she was undergoing a gender transition from male to female and that she

would be changing her name legally from Michael to Brandi.

17. Following this meeting, Defendants managers and employees made

derogatory comments about Bransons appearance, and the ostracism by her co-workers

intensified.

18. From about April 2011, until her termination, all but one of Defendants

physicians stopped referring patients to Branson for hearing services, thereby depriving her

of her client base.

19. On or about June 10, 2011, Defendant fired Branson, telling her that the

position of Director of Hearing Services was being eliminated. Defendant told Branson that

it would not hire an employee to replace her, as it was closing its hearing services division.

20. At the time of her termination, Branson was successfully performing the

duties of her position.

21. On or about August 2011, Defendant hired a replacement for Branson and

continued to operate its hearing services division. Branson was replaced by a male employee

who conformed to traditional male gender norms.

22. As a result of the foregoing, Branson suffered damages.

23. Paragraphs 10 through 22 are fully incorporated herein.

STATEMENT OF CLAIMS


-5-

24. Defendant engaged in unlawful employment practices, in violation of Section

703(a)(1) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a)(1), by terminating Branson because of sex.

25. Defendant's decision to terminate Branson was motivated by sex-based

considerations. Specifically, Defendant terminated Branson because Branson is transgender,

because of Branson's transition from male to female, and/or because Branson did not

conform to the Defendant's sex- or gender-based preferences, expectations, or stereotypes.

26. The effect of the practices complained of in paragraphs 10 through 22 above

has been to deprive Branson of equal employment opportunities and otherwise adversely

affect her status as an employee because of her sex.

27. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraphs 10 through

22 above were intentional.

28. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraphs 10 through

22 above were done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights

of Branson.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Wherefore, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court:

A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its officers, agents,

servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them,

from engaging in any unlawful practice that discriminates against an employee or applicant

because of their sex, including on the basis of gender identity;


-6-

B. Order Defendant to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs

that provide equal employment opportunities regardless of sex (including gender identity),

and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices;

C. Order Defendant to make Branson whole, providing reinstatement or front pay

in lieu of reinstatement, if not feasible;

D. Order Defendant to make Branson whole, providing appropriate backpay with

prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief

necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices;

E. Order Defendant to make Branson whole by providing compensation for past

and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described in

paragraphs 10 through 22 above in amounts to be determined at trial;

F. Order Defendant to make Branson whole by providing compensation for past

and future nonpecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful practices complained of in

paragraphs 10 through 22 above, including emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, loss of

enjoyment of life, and humiliation, in amounts to be determined at trial;

G. Order Defendant to pay Branson punitive damages for its malicious or

recklessly indifferent conduct described in paragraphs 10 through 22 above, in amounts to be

determined at trial;

H. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the

public interest; and

I. Award the Commission its costs of this action.


-7-

JURY TRIAL DEMAND

The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its complaint.

Respectfully submitted,

P. DAVID LOPEZ

General Counsel JAMES LEE Deputy General Counsel GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 131 M Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20507

ROBERT WEISBERG

Regional Attorney Florida Bar # 285676 KIMBERLY A. CRUZ Supervisory Trial Attorney Florida Bar # 153729 s/ Jan Shelly________________ JAN SHELLY TRIAL COUNSEL Senior Trial Attorney Missouri Bar # 42085 SAMANTHA WILLIAMS Trial Attorney Florida Bar # 0107117

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


-8-

501 East Polk Street, Suite 1000 Tampa, Florida 33602 Telephone: 813-202-7947

Facsimile: 813-228-2045 Email: [email protected] [email protected]


JS 44 (Rev. 12/12) CIVIL COVER SHEETThe JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except asprovided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for thepurpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)

I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS

(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff County of Residence of First Listed Defendant(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)

NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.

(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)

II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for Plaintiff(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant)

1 U.S. Government 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEFPlaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State 1 1 Incorporated or Principal Place 4 4

of Business In This State

2 U.S. Government 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State 2 2 Incorporated and Principal Place 5 5Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State

Citizen or Subject of a 3 3 Foreign Nation 6 6 Foreign Country

IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an X in One Box Only)CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES

110 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY 625 Drug Related Seizure 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 375 False Claims Act 120 Marine 310 Airplane 365 Personal Injury - of Property 21 USC 881 423 Withdrawal 400 State Reapportionment 130 Miller Act 315 Airplane Product Product Liability 690 Other 28 USC 157 410 Antitrust 140 Negotiable Instrument Liability 367 Health Care/ 430 Banks and Banking 150 Recovery of Overpayment 320 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceutical PROPERTY RIGHTS 450 Commerce

& Enforcement of Judgment Slander Personal Injury 820 Copyrights 460 Deportation 151 Medicare Act 330 Federal Employers Product Liability 830 Patent 470 Racketeer Influenced and 152 Recovery of Defaulted Liability 368 Asbestos Personal 840 Trademark Corrupt Organizations

Student Loans 340 Marine Injury Product 480 Consumer Credit (Excludes Veterans) 345 Marine Product Liability LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY 490 Cable/Sat TV

153 Recovery of Overpayment Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY 710 Fair Labor Standards 861 HIA (1395ff) 850 Securities/Commodities/ of Veterans Benefits 350 Motor Vehicle 370 Other Fraud Act 862 Black Lung (923) Exchange

160 Stockholders Suits 355 Motor Vehicle 371 Truth in Lending 720 Labor/Management 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) 890 Other Statutory Actions 190 Other Contract Product Liability 380 Other Personal Relations 864 SSID Title XVI 891 Agricultural Acts 195 Contract Product Liability 360 Other Personal Property Damage 740 Railway Labor Act 865 RSI (405(g)) 893 Environmental Matters 196 Franchise Injury 385 Property Damage 751 Family and Medical 895 Freedom of Information

362 Personal Injury - Product Liability Leave Act Act Medical Malpractice 790 Other Labor Litigation 896 Arbitration

REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS 791 Employee Retirement FEDERAL TAX SUITS 899 Administrative Procedure 210 Land Condemnation 440 Other Civil Rights Habeas Corpus: Income Security Act 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff Act/Review or Appeal of 220 Foreclosure 441 Voting 463 Alien Detainee or Defendant) Agency Decision 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment 442 Employment 510 Motions to Vacate 871 IRSThird Party 950 Constitutionality of 240 Torts to Land 443 Housing/ Sentence 26 USC 7609 State Statutes 245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations 530 General 290 All Other Real Property 445 Amer. w/Disabilities - 535 Death Penalty IMMIGRATION

Employment Other: 462 Naturalization Application 446 Amer. w/Disabilities - 540 Mandamus & Other 465 Other Immigration

Other 550 Civil Rights Actions 448 Education 555 Prison Condition

560 Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement

V. ORIGIN (Place an X in One Box Only) 1 Original

Proceeding 2 Removed from

State Court 3 Remanded from

Appellate Court 4 Reinstated or

Reopened 5 Transferred from

Another District(specify)

6 MultidistrictLitigation

VI. CAUSE OF ACTIONCite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity): Brief description of cause:

VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT:

CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTIONUNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P.

DEMAND $ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint:JURY DEMAND: Yes No

VIII. RELATED CASE(S) IF ANY (See instructions): JUDGE DOCKET NUMBERDATE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

RECEIPT # AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 1-1 Filed 09/25/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID 9

JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 12/12)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44Authority For Civil Cover Sheet

The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers asrequired by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, isrequired for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk ofCourt for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows:

I.(a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and then the official, giving both name and title.

(b) County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)

(c) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, notingin this section "(see attachment)".

II. Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X" in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here.United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box.Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity cases.)

III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark thissection for each principal party.

IV. Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI below, is sufficient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more than one nature of suit, select the most definitive.

V. Origin. Place an "X" in one of the six boxes.Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts.Removed from State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441. When the petition for removal is granted, check this box.Remanded from Appellate Court. (3) Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the filing date.Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date.Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers or multidistrict litigation transfers.Multidistrict Litigation. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1407. When this box is checked, do not check (5) above.

VI. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service

VII. Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.

VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.

Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 1-1 Filed 09/25/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID 10

PRAYER FOR RELIEFJURY TRIAL DEMAND

Brief Description: Unlawful employment practices on the basis of sexDemand: 17: 18: 15: 16: 13: 14: 11: 12: Button: SaveAs: Print1: Reset:

V: Origin: 1

Date: 9/25/2014County_of_Residence_of_Fi: PolkCauseofAction: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amendedDOCKET_NUMBER: Attorneys: Plaintiff: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commissionb_County_of_Residence_of: Nature of Suit: 442

Sig: s/ Jan ShellyCHECK_IF_THIS_IS_A_CLASS: JUDGE: FirmName: Jan Shelly, Esq.; U.S. EEOC, Tampa Field Office, 501 E. Polk Street, Tampa, FL 33602, (813)202-7947Defendant: Lakeland Eye ClinicCHECK_YES_only_if_demand1: Yes

10: 7: Basis of Jurisdiction: 1.U.S. Plaintiff

9: 8:

Documents

Florida Suit