i

FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST PRESERVATION 2000 PROGRAM APPLICATION FORM FCT/P2000-4 (effective 2-10-98) PROJECT NAME Little River Preserve

(Descriptive site name) APPLICANT NAME City of Miami

(Name of local government(s) requesting award) Address of local government applicant's principal offices 444 SW 2nd Avenue 8th Floor Miami, FL 33130 PARTNERSHIP APPLICATIONS

Is this a partnership application between two or more local governments as described in Rule 9K-4.0031(12), F.A.C.?

Yes No X

If “Yes,” provide the name of the local government(s) and the address of the principal office of all local governments that are partnering with the above-named applicant in this application.

APPLICATION PHASE KEY CONTACT PERSON

Note: The Key Contact is required to be an employee of the local government; this individual will be receiving grant-related correspondence and may be required to provide supplemental information; identify only one key contact person.

Key contact name Alberto Ruder First Middle Last Title Director Elected Official? Yes No X Department City of Miami Department of Parks and Recreation Mailing Address PO Box 330708 City Miami State FL Zip Code 33233-0708

If the applicant’s principal office address is a post office box then a delivery address is required. Delivery Address 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 8th Floor City Miami State FL ZipCode 33233-0708

2

Phone Number 305-416-1320 Primary Secondary (if applicable) SunCom (if applicable) Fax Number 305-416-2154 Primary Secondary (if applicable) SunCom (if applicable) Cellular Phone (if applicable) E-mail Address (if applicable) ESTIMATED TOTAL ACREAGE 4.5 acres

Indicate the exact acreage of the project site, if known. Otherwise, estimate the acreage to two significant digits (e.g., 3.1 acres, 35 acres, 120 acres).

OWNERSHIP Number of separate parcels within project site 4 If the site is comprised of multiple parcels, see Rule 9K-4.004(5), F.A.C. Number of different owners within project site 2 If only one owner, provide name, address, and phone number

Note: If the project site is comprised of more than one parcel or more than one owner, complete the attached Acquisition Plan to indicate the general priority and order of the acquisition of sites to insure that, in the event that all sites are not acquired, the purposes of the project will be achieved.

Has the entire project site been preacquired by the applicant through a voluntarily-negotiated transaction within one year prior to the application deadline or will it be acquired within 180 days after the application deadline? (Check the appropriate response below.)

Yes No X

If “Yes,” state the closing date of the acquisition(s)

Has a portion of the project site been preacquired by the applicant through a voluntarily-negotiated transaction within one year prior to the application deadline or will any portion(s) be acquired within 180 days after the application deadline? (Check the appropriate response below.)

Yes No X

If “Yes,” state the closing date of the acquisition(s) Note: The use of condemnation or the threat of condemnation is not considered a voluntarily-negotiated transaction.

PROJECT SITE LOCATION County(s) Miami Dade Primary Section Township Range

Note: Cite only one Section, Township and Range to indicate where most or all of the project acreage resides. Be sure to include the directional designations (i.e., Section 21 , Township 1 S , Range 1 E ).

3

PROJECT COSTS Estimate the project costs as defined in Rule 9K-4.002(31), F.A.C. Enter an amount in every blank; if the amount is zero, enter $0.00.

Cost to purchase land $ 240,000 (1) Other acquisition costs

Cost of appraisal map(s)/certified survey(s) and review $ 36,000

Cost of appraisals and review $ 10,000

Cost of title report(s)/insurance $ 4,000

Cost of environmental audit(s) $ 10,000

Eligible fees or commissions, if any $ Other eligible project cost, if any $ Subtotal of the “Other acquisition costs” $ 60,000 (2) ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 300,000 (3) (Should equal the sum of lines (1) and (2).) Amount of award requested from FCT $ 150,000 Amount or value of local match $ 150,000 (4) (As defined in 9K-4.0031(9), F.A.C.) ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 300,000 (Should be the same as (3) shown above) Percent of award from FCT 50 % (percent of estimated total project costs to be contributed by the Florida Communities Trust) Percent of local match 50 % (percent of estimated total project costs to be contributed by the local government) TOTAL PERCENTAGE 100 %

4

Specify the form(s) and source(s) of local match and a brief explanation as appropriate:

XX Cash from the local government Amount $150,000 Explain Safe Neighborhood Parks Bonds and/or Community Development Block Grants and/or Environmentally Endangered Lands Program Future cash from the local government Amount Explain Cash from Water Management District Amount Explain Cash from federal or state grant Amount Explain Cash from private donation Amount Explain Value of real property owned by the local Amount Explain government in a qualified preacquisition Value of real property donated by the Amount Explain landowner in a documented bargain sale or donation agreement. Include documen- tation letter from the owner. If the land is preacquired in a bargain sale, then the contract must evidence a bargain sale. Loan from the Florida Communities Trust Specify the payback strategy for loan Amount Explain TOTAL $150,000 (Should be equal to (4) on previous page.) TYPE OF AWARD REQUESTED

What type of award is requested in accordance with Rule 9K-4.0031, F.A.C? (Check only one) Award of less than 50% of the project costs from FCT. X Award of 50% or more of the project costs from FCT.

100% award for which no local match is required.

Note: 100% awards are available only to county governments with a population of 75,000 or fewer and municipalities with a population of 10,000 or fewer.

POPULATION 364,765

Note: Use the most recent estimate of resident population from the most recent edition of Florida Estimates of Population as published by the Population Division, Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida.

Loan

Combination of a grant and loan

5

Acquisition Plan

On page 2 of the application under the “Ownership”section, note the number of separate parcels and the number of different owners reported to be within the project site. If either response contains a number greater than 1, complete this page. Project Name: Little River Preserve Applicant: City of Miami Rule 9K-4.004(5)(g), Florida Administrative Code, reads in part as follows:

If the project site consists of more than one parcel or owner, an Acquisition Plan, as defined in Rule 9K-4.002(2), is required.

Rule 9K-4.002(2), Florida Administrative Code, reads as follows:

Acquisition Plan applies to Project Sites with multiple parcels or multiple owners and means a written description of the priority parcels and the general order in which the parcels will be acquired to assure that, in the event that all parcels cannot be acquired, the purposes of the project can be achieved.

Florida Communities Trust (FCT) staff will review the acquisition plan to assure that the purposes of the project can be achieved in the event all parcels can not be acquired. 1. Provide the tax identification number, and the name, address and phone number, if available, for

all the owners of parcels within the project boundary East Large ID#01-3207-020-0070 Green-East #2 Ltd, c/o Terranova Corp., 1200 Brickell Ave, Ste 1500, Miami, FL 33131-3257, 305-358-8700 East Small ID#01-3207-014-0260 Green-East #2 Ltd, c/o Terranova Corp., 1200 Brickell Ave, Ste 1500, Miami, FL 33131-3257, 305-358-8700 West Large ID#01-3207-020-0310 Burton Hersh, c/o B. Avchen, 1840 W. 49 St, Hialeah, FL 33012 West Small ID#01-3207-020-0320 Burton Hersh, c/o B. Avchen, 1840 W. 49 St, Hialeah, FL 33012 2. Identify the priority parcels needed to achieve the purposes of the project. All parcels listed above are needed to achieve the purposes of the project as designed, but the two West parcels are priority parcels. The East parcels cannot be acquired by purchase because of green space restrictions. However, the owner is open to a long-term lease of the East parcels. The project can be carried out without compromise to the overall program objectives by acquiring only the West parcels. 3. Identify the order in which the parcels should be acquired, parcels can be grouped in categories. West large and small, then East large and small.

6

PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES [Rule 9K-4.0031(10)&(12) and Rule 9K-4.004(5)(a)3., F.A.C.] The site for the proposed Little River Preserve comprises 4.5 acres on the south side of the Little River and lying on both sides of the FEC railroad line. The site of one of Miami-Dade County’s first plant nurseries, it has been vacant for many years. As the momentum to revitalize neighborhoods along Biscayne Blvd gains force, however, pressure to develop the property will grow. At this point in time it represents the best opportunity to preserve a significant amount of green space for purposes of environmental protection, historical preservation, community education and recreation in a densely populated, relatively low-income urban area. A nature preserve/park at this site would provide recreation and environmental education for a population of 24,560 persons living within a one-mile walking distance (See 1990 census map Attachment E).

For many years residents of the Little River Oakland Grove Neighborhood Association to the west of the site and El Portal on the north side of the Little River have been working to secure funding to acquire and manage the site as a passive conservation park. Scientists working for the Save the Manatee Club and DERM have been monitoring the crucial manatee aggregation area at the site and trying to secure ways to protect it from commercial or residential development. The City of Miami’s Upper East Side Master Plan identified the site as a future park. These efforts received a strong impetus in 1998 when the South Florida Regional Planning Council held an Eastward Ho! Planning Charrette for this area of northeast Miami-Dade County. The charrette identified the site as having great intrinsic environmental and historical value, as well as the potential to transform the image of the area and how different neighborhoods relate to each other and their shared environment. With the help of the plans developed by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and many volunteers who staffed the charrette, the concepts underlying this application were developed. Attached are pages from the charrette draft report on the Little River preserve. It should be noted that these reflect a long-range vision; some of the included features such as a footbridge across the Little River may not be possible to incorporate under the current plan (See Attachment C.) A Little River Preserve at this site would be an important focal point in the plans for the revitalization of the north part of the City of Miami and nearby areas of northeast Miami-Dade County..

The value of the proposed Little River Preserve for environmental and historical preservation and education is due to its location at a very important point of confluence of geology, biology and human history. In the first place, it is located at the point where the Little River crosses the Coastal Ridge, which is at its narrowest point in this part of South Florida. For Calusa, Tequesta, and later Seminole Indians, traveling by canoe, it was an important route between Biscayne Bay and the Everglades. Many large water birds here also follow the river as the natural flyway from the Everglades to Biscayne Bay. For them, as it was for the earlier human inhabitants, it is still the natural passage. Archaeological study has confirmed prehistoric settlements which link the site with the Tequesta Indian burial mound directly north across the Little River in El Portal. In the 1890s, it became part of the route of Henry Flagler's railroad. In this century the property has had a number of interesting uses, most particularly as one of the earliest plant nurseries in South Florida.

For the preservation of wildlife, the Little River Preserve is crucial. The site is adjacent to a uniquely important habitat for manatees--called an aggregation area--where manatees frequently gather to rest, play, mate, nurse or give birth. Miami-Dade County DERM has designated this area as an “essential manatee habitat” -- one which would be eliminated if commercial development or unplanned recreational uses were to take place. Water birds nest on the site even with the currently degraded native tree habitat. Larger numbers can be expected to do so if the habitat is restored and protected as proposed.

The establishment and development of the Little River Preserve is projected to take place in two phases. First, the City of Miami will acquire the land and rezone the property from residential to conservation. The Oakland Grove Neighborhood Improvement Association, Inc. [a five-year-old 501 (c) 3 nonprofit

7

organization], will manage the property and seek funding to secure the property with fencing and begin a neighborhood-based program, with a strong educational component, for the removal of invasive exotics and restoration of the native plant and animal habitat of the site’s shoreline. During phase one additional funding will be sought to plan the developments of Phase Two, as well as further biological and historical research needed to develop the site as a natural preserve that actively mitigates the damage it has sustained in the last century.

During Phase Two, the plans for facilities on the site will be completed. Funding will be obtained and construction initiated for the facilities.. The most important facility will probably be a learning center to provide on-site environmental and historical education for children and adults. A trail system and observation platform will be designed to allow visitors to observe birds and water animals without disturbing them. The observation platform will also enable visitors to safely cross the FEC railroad tracks into the wetlands glade area.

8

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Rule 9K-4.0031(12) and Rule 9K-4.004(5)(b)5., F.A.C. The proposed use of the Little River Preserve is generally consistent with the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP). The MCNP designation for this location is Single Family Residential and Medium Density Residential. Applicable policies of the City MCNP include the following: The Land Use Element of the MCNP encourages land development regulations which will protect the city’s unique natural and coastal resources, and its historic and cultural heritage (Objective LU-1.5). The City’s land development regulations will direct recreation activities to areas of the city where facilities and services are available (Policy LU-1.7.1). The Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element of the MCNP stresses the development of public park and open spaces that are aesthetically appealing and enhance the character and image of the city (Goal PR-2). The Coastal Management Element of the MCNP established the retrofitting of storm water outfalls that discharge into the Miami River and its tributaries, the Little River and directly into Biscayne Bay (Policy CM-1.1.2), encourages maintenance of public access to the City's shoreline (Goal CM-2, Objectives CM-2.1). It also calls for shoreline stabilization as part of the development or redevelopment of waterfront properties (Objective CM-2.1.6), and incorporate provisions for public physical and visual access to the shoreline in its waterfront zoning regulations (Policy CM-2.1.7). The proposed project will satisfy these directives. The Natural Resource Conservation Element of the MCNP emphasizes the need to protect and enhance natural resources within the City, and especially within the coastal zone. The proposed project is adjacent to an area of the Little River essential to the health of the endangered West Indian Manatee, offers a compromised habitat for water birds, and provides a habitat for urban wildlife. The acquisition of the property and enhancement activities offers the opportunity to recreate vegetative communities and provide an improved natural habitat for South Florida wildlife. These activities are consistent with (Policies NR-1.1.6 and NR-1.3.4). Special mention is made regarding the relationship between the City of Miami Comprehensive Plan and that of Miami-Dade County. The Miami-Dade Home Rule Charter is part of the Florida State Constitution. The Miami-Dade Home Rule Charter gives the County broad authority over its municipalities and comprehensive planning functions. Miami-Dade County is authorized to devise and implement a comprehensive plan not only for the county but the plan may reach into and apply to municipal governments as well. The City of Miami maintains that it is fully appropriate to cite Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Plan policies as part of its Florida Communities Trust application as a matter of State Constitutional law. The practical effect is that the comprehensive plan of the City of Miami must not contradict the Miami-Dade comprehensive plan and must not be inconsistent. Although the City of Miami has its separate comprehensive community plan, that plan compliments and flows from the Miami-Dade comprehensive plan. In support of this position from the perspective of Florida State Constitutional Law, we insert here selected portions of the Miami-Dade Home Rule Charter that collectively stand for the proposition that it is lawful for municipalities within Miami-Dade County to cite county plan directives because the county has special over and reaching into its municipalities. The text without redactions appears as Attachment J to this proposal.

9

CONCEPTUAL MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SOURCE OF FUNDING FOR MANAGEMENT [Rule 9K-4.004(5)(d), F.A.C.] PURPOSE The Little River Preserve provides an opportunity to save two of the last remaining undeveloped parcels on the historical Little River from high density development. Located at the convergence of the Little River, the coastal ridge, Henry Flagler's railroad and archeologically significant land , its preservation as a passive park and open recreation space provides the opportunity to restore natural vegetation to its 1870s state. As a park in a significantly underserved area of the City of Miami -- the Little Haiti Neighborhood Enhancement Team (NET) service area -- the Little River Preserve will provide a unique setting for educational experiences as area students and adults learn about their neighborhood history and environment. The site provides an excellent opportunity for a regional facility to be shared by the City of Miami, El Portal, Miami Shores and unincorporated Miami-Dade County. The Little River Preserve will be developed in two phases as detailed below. SITE DEVELOPMENT Physical Improvements: There are no existing physical improvements on the site now. Phase One will entail historical restoration of the site, beginning with securing of the property, removal of existing exotic plants, shoreline restoration along the Little River, and reforestation to return the site with hammock vegetation on the ridge and mangroves along the river front. Phase Two will involve planning, funding and building physical improvements which probably will include an educational learning center, a raised observation platform for manatee and wildlife viewing, benches, walkways, parking facilities, and a small “ranger station” with restrooms and an office for the Oakland Grove Neighborhood Improvement Association. Access: The project site is accessible through the residential neighborhood bounded by NE 82nd Street and NE 2nd Avenue by automobile, bicycle and pedestrian. The site is also a potential stop on the proposed Miami-Dade County Off-Road Bicycle Pathway (see Exhibit J2), and the Rails to Trails program, and the Flagler Trail proposed by the North Dade Greenways Plan (see Attachment G).. Easement, Concessions or Leases: FEC railroad has an easement which bisects the property from north to south and South Florida Water Management District has an easement along the eastern boundary of the property (see Exhibit L). KEY MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES Natural Resource Protection: In phase one the Oakland Grove Neighborhood Improvement Association Inc. will seek funding for restoration of the site’s original habitat. Exotic plants will be removed and the site will be restored to its 1870s natural state with native species appropriate for the hammock area and the river shoreline. This effort will be assisted by the Sierra Club's Inner-City Outings Group, as well as other organized volunteer efforts. Resource Enhancement: Revegetation of the project site will recreate a natural area on an inner-city vacant lot, which has lost most of the native plants that were on the property in the early 1870s. Through this effort,

10

the enhanced vegetation will provide new homes for birds on an essential flyway; the new mangrove reforestation will provide spawning grounds for fish, and sea grass restoration will provide additional food supply for the West Indian Manatee population at a significant aggregation site. Archeological and Historical Resource Protection: Archaeological investigations were conducted on the site in 1959 and 1978 and Miami-Dade County archaeologists have recommended monitoring of any further development. This site conforms with other known prehistoric settlement sites in Southeast Florida, and is part of the Tequesta habitation area including the Tequesta mound located on the north side of the Little River in El Portal. Nineteenth century pioneer settlements in the area included mills for manufacturing coontie into starch and citrus groves. In the late 1800s the site was part of one of the first nurseries located in Miami-Dade County, established by the Soar family whose descendants still reside across from the site. Environmental Education Program: The restoration of the project site provides the opportunity for local inner-city school children as well as adults to become involved with and better understand native plants, to learn how to propagate and cultivate native species, and how to protect native animals by creating habitats for birds and water animals. Greenway Management: The North Dade Greenways Plan adopted in April 1998 (see attachment G) and the City of Miami’s Upper Eastside Master Plan (attachment F) both include the site. During PhaseTwo funding will be sought to link the trails in the Little River Preserve to trails planned by these projects. Coordination: Acquisition of the site will be coordinated by The Trust for Public Land (TPL), a national non-profit land conservation organization. Restoration of the vegetation will be coordinated by the Oakland Grove Neighborhood Improvement Association, Inc. and its junior staff, the Village of El Portal, and assisted by both the City of Miami Parks and Recreation Department. Miami-Dade County’s Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM). and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) will be involved in the shoreline restoration project. Educational programs will be developed in coordination with SFWMD, DERM, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, and Miami-Dade Public Libraries. Maintenance: Ongoing operations, maintenance and management of the project site will be coordinated by the Oakland Grove Neighborhood Improvement Association. Security and Safety: Due to the passive nature of the site, its location in a residential neighborhood, and the safety issue of water on two sides of the property, the site has natural access control. During Phase One funding will be sought to secure the remaining access areas with an 8' fence and which will be locked at closing.

11

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING SOURCE Shoreline restoration Vegetation $30,000

Funding Source: Potential grants from Florida Inland Navigational District (FIND), State of Florida Department of Forestry, and the SFWMD.

Hammock restoration Year 1 Exotic Control and Planting $40,000 Year 2-5 Exotic Control & Enhancement $30,000 Year 6-10 Exotic Control & Enhancement $30,000

Funding Source: Foundations and grants from the Safe Neighborhood Parks Act, as well as State of Florida Department of Forestry, and the SFWMD.

MONITORING Monitoring of the restoration activities will be coordinated by the Oakland Grove Neighborhood Improvement Association, Inc., the City of Miami Department of Parks and Recreation, the City of Miami Planning Department, and the Miami-Dade County Division of Environmental Resource Management (DERM).

12

PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA (1) Furtherance of Growth Management and Comprehensive Plan Implementation [Rule 9K-

4.008(1)(a-b), F.A.C.] (a) Growth Management Objectives. The project supports and furthers growth management objectives

as they relate to natural resource conservation, coastal protection, and outdoor recreation. 1.Does the proposed project assist the applicant in ensuring the proper location and distribution of developmen

other high hazard area or a 100-year flood plain. Discuss how acquiring the project site will ensure the proper location and distribution of development by redirecting development away from coastal or other high hazard area or a 100-year flood plain. (10 points);

The proposed project is located at the edge of the Little River on the 100 year flood plain (see

attached map Exhibit M-2). The acquisition of the property will ensure that future development is directed to a more appropriate area. The site is located within the urban service center. Site acquisition is critical for providing amenities for future development and furthermore will prevent urban sprawl.

2. Does the proposed project help rectify land use conflicts associated with antiquated subdivisions or vested land uses that became non-conforming as a result of adoption of the local comprehensive plan? If so, provide a copy of the antiquated subdivision plat or vested land use determination. Discuss how the antiquated subdivision or the vested land use is in conflict with the adopted comprehensive plan. Cite the specific objectives or policies in the comprehensive plan or the specific land development regulations that are in conflict or vested land use. (10 points);

Presently, the surrounding area is predominantly residential in nature. The Florida East Coast Railway bisects the site. The proposed project will thus help rectify any possible future land use conflict associated with vested land uses that become non-conforming as a result of adoption of the local comprehensive plan. Although the MCNP does not reflect antiquated subdivisions or vested land uses that became non-conforming as a result of adoption of the local comprehensive plan, acquisition of this site will rectify the possibility of future conflicts.

Objective LU-1.7: Encourage recreational development within designated recreation use areas, concentrating activities where the capability of existing public facilities can serve development meeting adopted LOS standards.

Policy LU-1.7.1: The City's land development regulations will direct recreational

activities to areas of the City where facilities and services are available.

3. Does the proposed project provide additional outdoor recreation opportunities within the existing urban service area? If so, provide a copy of the Future Land Use Map showing the designated Urban service area or other similar designations that have been formally adopted by the local government on its Future Land Use Map or provide documentation that the project site is located in a built-up area where public facilities and services such as sewage treatment system, roads, schools, and recreation areas are already in place. (10 points);

13

The site is located in the northeast part of the Edison/Little River area of the City of Miami, just south of the Villages of El Portal and Miami Shores. The acquisition of this site will create a new conservative preserve park which is needed in this section of the City. The site will be ideal for passive recreational use, providing recreational opportunities within this service area. This site is one of the few vacant available sites left on the Little River. The site and vicinity are currently serviced by water and sewer services. Also, the City of Miami is over 90 percent built out. (See map at Exhibit H)

Objective LU-1.7: Encourage recreational development within designated recreation use areas, concentrating activities where the capacity of existing public facilities can serve development meeting adopted LOS standards. Policy LU-1.7.1: The City's land development regulations will direct recreational activities to areas of the city where facilities and services are available.

The proposed Little River Preserve is well within both the Miami-Dade County’s Urban Development Boundary (UDB) and Urban Infill Area (UIA). The UDB delineates the extent of the County’s urban service area for water, sewer, transportation, and other infrastructure. The UIA designates an area where appropriate development and redevelopment activities are encouraged, as well as the installation of additional urban services necessary to support such development and redevelopment activities. Both boundaries have been incorporated into the Miami-Dade County CDMP and the City of Miami’s MCNP.

(b) Local Comprehensive Plan Provisions for Conservation, Coastal Management, and Outdoor Recreation and Open Space. Acquisition of the project site will assist the local government in furthering the local comprehensive plan directives set forth in the objectives and policy statements contained in the plan elements that provide for conservation, coastal management, and outdoor recreation and open space. When used in this part, the term “furthered” means that proposed projects will assist the local government in realizing goals, objectives, or policy directives of the comprehensive plan. For each criterion that is furthered by an objective or policy of the local government comprehensive plan, the objective or policy number is to be cited in the response to the criterion and a copy of the objective or policy, and any associated exhibits or documents, shall be included as an exhibit as described in 9K-4.004(4)(b)4., F.A.C. If a copy of the entire objective or policy that is cited in response to a criterion is not included in the exhibit, that objective or policy will not be evaluated as to whether it is furthered by that criterion.

1. Does the proposed project further comprehensive plan directives that ensure the

protection of natural areas or open space through public acquisition? If so, summarize the relevant objectives or policies that are furthered. Provide the numeric citation of the relevant objectives or policies. Discuss how the project site would assist in furthering the cited objectives or policies. (5 points);

The proposed project will support protection of the natural features of the Little River through public acquisition. The MCNP does not directly address acquisition of such areas for the express purpose of

14

environmental protection but rather within the context of expansion of existing uses. In 1997, the Department of Parks and Recreation prepared a mandatory parks Recovery Action Program (RAP) planning document which was submitted to the National Park Service (NPS) as part of its conditional responsibilities associated with the receipt of grant funding from the Urban Parks and Recreation Recovery Program. On pages 24, 30 and 31 of the NPS approved RAP Plan, the professional staff of the Miami Department of Parks and Recreation discuss the need for acquisition of additional park lands. Excerpts from the RAP plan that touch on this issue are as follows:

[Pages 24, 30 and 31 From the Recovery Action Program Plan]

* * * * * * * * * *

1. PHYSICAL ISSUES

a. Types of Facilities, Distribution of Acreages, Uses at Different Locations The City’s parks system faces such physical issues as the need for expansion and development due to intensive use and rehabilitation of deteriorating facilities. There is a need to modernize, upgrade and expand these parks and recreational facilities where required. The biggest deficiencies in open space occurs in the Planning Districts of Little Havana (-99.42 acres), Flagami (-6.05 acres) and Allapattah (+7.54 acres), see Table 4.

Table 4 1995 Recreation Open Space

by Planning District

Planning Existing Park 1995 Required Surplus Acres for District Space Acreage Population Acreage (LOS) (Deficit) 1000

Acreage

Northeast (A) 182.68 78,093 101.52 81.16 2.34

Downtown (B) 184.85 42,641 55.43 129.42 4.34

Coconut Grove (C) 116.88 37,849 49.2 67.68 3.09

Little Havana (D) 37.3 105,166 136.72 -99.42 0.35

Flagami (E) 53.23 45,600 59.28 -6.05 1.17

Allapattah (F) 82.05 57,316 74.51 7.54 1.43

Total Acreage 656.99 366,650 476.65 180.35 1.79 Source: City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department, Neighborhood Planning Section Parks and Recreation Department Note: In computing the total acreage of pars, recreation and open space, the islands in the Northeast (Planning District A) and Coconut Grove (Planning District C) were included. These properties have relatively little use and are accessible by boat. Therefore, the acreage of parks and recreation for the use of the general population is less than shown in the above table. There is underdeveloped parkland owned by the City, however, all but one site consists of undersized mini parks and traffic circles or medians which offer limited development potential. The exception is the Florida East Coast property in the Downtown district. This property is adjacent to Bicentennial Park.

15

Physical Issues 1. There is a need to evaluate the usefulness of some City park facilities, underdeveloped mini parks and vacant parcels to

determine their potential disposition. 2. There is a need to promote more corporate sponsorship of capital improvements in the parks. 3. There is a need to continue to assess and correct physical safety problems with park facilities. 4. There is a need to continue ongoing efforts to meet all ADA requirements in the parks. 5. There is a need to redefine spaces uses for Parks and Open Space. Some of the so-called parks are only median strips and

leftover space that do not provide any recreational facilities but count as park acreage.

* * * * * * * * * *

d. Rehabilitation Issues 1. There is a need to develop a Parks and Recreation Master Plan that would address future directions for capital improvements,

maintenance, and recreation programming. 2. There is a need to compile complete inventory of park facilities that would include current conditions and recommendations

to rehabilitate or replace. Goal I To meet the physical needs of parks. Objectives:

2. Develop or dispose of some City park facilities, including, underdeveloped mini park sites. 3. Promote more corporate and financial support for park improvements. 4. Continue to assess physical safety conditions. 5. Continue ongoing efforts to meet ADA standards.

Goal II To establish a rehabilitation program for the parks and facilities. Objectives:

1. Prepare a Comprehensive Park and Recreation Master Plan. 2. Compile an inventory of park facilities. 3. Provide the rehabilitation needed in all of the system’s parks.

* * * * * * * * * * *

The RAP Plan approval letter from the National Park Service is included in this proposal as Attachment H

The following Policy from the Natural Resources Element of the MCNP addresses the protection of natural areas through protective regulation.

Objective NR-1.3: Maintain and enhance the status of native species and fauna and flora.

Policy NR-1.3.1: Continue and, where necessary, expand the use of scenic corridor and Environmental Preservation District designation.

16

The Natural Resource Conservation Element of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) requires, in Goal NR-1: that the City "Maintain, preserve, enhance and restore the quality of natural resources within the context of the City's urban environment." This Goal is further reinforced by the following policies:

Policy NR-1.1.2: By 1990, begin to reduce the quantity of storm water that discharges into the Miami River and its tributaries, and directly into Biscayne Bay; and by 1994 have at least the first 10 stormwater outfalls retrofitted. Policy NR-1.1.3: Beginning in 1990, take actions to reduce the level of contaminants carried into Biscayne Bay via the Miami and Little Rivers, and by 1995 the level of contaminants within these water bodies will be reduced by at least 20 percent. Policy NR-1.1.6: Through land development regulations, ensure that development or redevelopment within the coastal zone will not adversely affect the natural environment or lead to a net loss of public access to the city's natural resources. Policy NR-1.3.4: Review development and redevelopment to determine any adverse impacts on adjacent areas with significant native vegetative features, wildlife or marine life, and establish regulations that reduce or mitigate such impacts. Policy NR-1.3.6: Through the development review process, deny the use of intrusive exotic plant species, encourage the use of native plant species, and those species that do not require the excessive use of fertilizers, excessive watering, are not prone to insect infestation or disease, and do not have invasive root systems. Goal CM-1 of the Coastal Management Element of the MCNP requires the City to: "Maintain, protect, and enhance the quality of life and appearance of Miami's coastal zone including the preservation of natural resources as well as the enhancement of the built environment." This Goal is further reinforced by the following Objective and Policies:

Objective CM-1.1: Preserve and protect the existing natural systems including

wetlands and beach/dune systems within Virginia Key and those portions of Biscayne Bay that lie within the City's boundaries; and improve water quality within the Miami River, its tributaries, and the Little River. Policy CM-1.1.2: By 1990 the City will begin to retrofit storm water outfalls that discharge into the Miami River and its tributaries, the Little River and directly into Biscayne Bay. All such storm water outfalls will be retrofitted by 1999. If positive drainage systems to these water bodies are deemed to be the only feasible method of maintaining adequate storm drainage, then these storm sewers will be designed and constructed to retain grease and oil and minimize pollutant discharges. Policy CM-1.1.3: Beginning in 1990 the City will take actions to reduce the level of contaminants carried in Biscayne Bay via the Miami River, its tributaries and the Little River, and by 1995 the level of contaminants within these water bodies will be reduced by at least 20 percent. These actions will include, but not be limited to: modification and improvement maintenance of storm and sanitary sewer systems; increased frequency and extent of street sweeping; and encouraging the appropriate federal, state, and county agencies to dredge contaminated sediments from river bottoms.

17

Policy CM-1.1.5: Within the coastal zone, or along the Miami and Little Rivers, no land uses which represent a likely and significant source of pollution to surface waters will be permitted, unless measures which substantially eliminate the threat of contamination are implemented as conditions for approval of development or redevelopment. Policy CM-1.1.9: Site development criteria will ensure that development or redevelopment within the coastal zone will not adversely affect the natural environment or lead to a net loss of public access to the city's natural resources. Objective CM-2.1: Prevent the net loss of, and where feasible, increase physical and visual

access to Biscayne Bay and the city’s shoreline. Policy CM-2.1.2: All City owned, waterfront property will provide for public open spaces that provide access to the shoreline. Policy CM-2.1.6: By 1992, consider the need for, and appropriateness of, requiring appropriate shoreline stabilization as part of development or redevelopment of waterfront properties. Policy CM-2.1.7: By 1990, incorporate provisions for public physical and visual access to the shoreline in its waterfront zoning regulations. 2. Does the proposed project further comprehensive plan directives that ensure the

preservation of native vegetative communities? If so, summarize the relevant objectives or policies that are furthered. Provide the numeric citation of the relevant objectives or policies. Discuss how the project site would assist in furthering the cited objectives or policies. (5 points);

The proposed project site contains native vegetative communities of a high hammock (live oaks, strangler fig, gumbo limbo, sabal palms) and native pond apples along its northern shoreline. Numerous Policies from the MCNP support protection and preservation of vegetative communities:

Policy NR-1.3.2: Identify City owned land with significant native vegetative features or wildlife habitats, and designate those areas as Environmental Preservation Districts.

Policy NR-1.3.4: Review development and redevelopment to determine any adverse impacts on adjacent areas with significant native vegetative features, wildlife or marine life, and establish regulations that reduce or mitigate such impacts.

Policy PR-2.1.1: The City will preserve unique plant communities within the City's parks, by designating public parks with significant vegetative features as Environmental Preservation Districts; and by designating them as Conservation Areas on the Future Land Use Map.

Policy PR-2.1.3: The City will designate as scenic transportation corridors those segments of roadways which have significant vegetative features, and will develop bicycle and pedestrian paths along such corridors. Future land development regulations will provide sufficient land areas for uses that are compatible with and encourage the flow of bicycle and pedestrian traffic along these corridors.

18

3. Does the proposed project further comprehensive plan directives that ensure the protection of listed animal species or habitats of listed species? If so, summarize the relevant objectives or policies that are furthered. Provide the numeric citation of the relevant objectives or policies. Discuss how the project site would assist in furthering the cited objectives or policies. (5 points);

The project design will protect manatee aggregation areas from human contact. In Phase Two if funding is acquired an observation deck will enable viewing of manatees in a part of the river which is not an aggregation area. This is relevant to the Miami-Dade County Manatee Protection Plan (See Attachment A, DERM Technical Report 95-5), particularly the following from page 77:

Habitat Protection / Habitat Areas Aggregation Areas Any area where manatees frequently gather to rest, play, mate, nurse, or give birth shall be protected and/or enhanced. This protection shall occur through the Comprehensive Development Master Plan, zoning codes and ordinances and habitat acquisition by federal, state and local agencies where possible . . . Such areas include but are not limited to Sky Lake, Biscayne Canal near the Miami Shores Country Club Golf Course, Little River west of Biscayne Blvd., northwest Virginia Key, upstream Miami River including Palmer Lake, upstream Coral Gables Waterway, and Black Point Marina Basin.

In an urban area where many thousands of people live in close proximity with an essential habitat for an endangered species like the manatee, public education is essential. Acquisition of land for the Little River Preserve will enable efforts to seek funding for a learning center at the Preserve. This center will conduct classes and programs that will promote understanding to the residents in the area about the privilege and responsibilities they have in helping these animals survive.

The manatee sighting data gathered through numerous aerial surveys and tagging studies documenting the Little River as an important manatee habitat (Miami-Dade County Manatee Protection Plan: DERM Technical Report 95-5, p. 24).

Relevant MCNP policies include:

Objective NR- 1.3: Maintain and enhance the status of native species of fauna and flora.

Policy NR-1 .3.4: Review development and redevelopment to determine any adverse impacts on adjacent areas with significant native vegetative features, wildlife or marine life, and establish regulations that reduce or mitigate such impacts.

Policy NR-1 .3.8: Slow or idle speed zones shall be adopted in areas frequented by manatees and enforcement of speed zones will be improved.

19

4. Does the proposed project further comprehensive plan directives that ensure the protection or enhancement of beach or shoreline ecosystems? If so, summarize the relevant objectives or policies that are furthered. Provide the numeric citation of the relevant objectives or policies. Discuss how the project site would assist in furthering the cited objectives or policies. (5 points);

Although generally degraded, the northern shoreline of the project site consists of native, mature pond apples that form a freshwater riverbank ecosystem. The project will save these natives when the exotics are removed and the existing fill is removed. With the addition of mangroves, these will form the basis of the shoreline restoration. Relevant MCNP objectives include:

Objective NR-1.3: Maintain and enhance the status of native species of fauna and flora.

Policy LU-1.5.2: Land use regulations and development policies will be consistent with the intent and purpose of Miami-Dade County's Waterfront Charter Amendment, Shoreline Development Review Ordinance, and the rules of the Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve Management Area.

5. Does the proposed project further comprehensive plan directives to restore or enhance degraded natural areas including, but not limited to, removal of non-native vegetation, reforestation, shoreline or dune restoration, or restoration of natural hydrology? If so, summarize the relevant objectives or policies that are furthered. Provide the numeric citation of the relevant objectives or policies. Discuss how the project site would assist in furthering the cited objectives or policies. (5 points);

In the late 19th century, the Little River Preserve site consisted of a densely vegetated mangrove shoreline, lowland glade and upland hammock. The entire area has been greatly degraded. In Phase One, exotic plants will be removed and the site will be restored to its natural state with native species appropriate for the hammock area and the river shoreline.

Relevant MCNP policies include the following: Policy NR-1.3.2: Identify City owned land with significant native vegetative features or wildlife habitats, and designate those areas as Environmental Preservation Districts. Policy NR-1.3.4: Review development and redevelopment to determine any adverse impacts on adjacent areas with significant native vegetative features, wildlife or marine life, and establish regulations that reduce or mitigate such impacts.

Policy NR-1.3.6: Through the development review process, deny the use of intrusive exotic plant species, encourage the use of native plant species, and those species that do not require the excessive use of fertilizers, excessive watering, are not prone to insect infestation or disease, and do not have invasive root systems.

20

6. Does the proposed project further comprehensive plan directives that ensure the

protection or enhancement of surface and groundwater quality? If so, summarize the relevant objectives or policies that are furthered. Provide the numeric citation of the relevant objectives or policies. Discuss how the project site would assist in furthering the cited objectives or policies. (5 points);

The reforestation of the site will serve to contain surface water within the site to prevent river contamination. The Conservation Element states that the City shall enforce the requirements for retaining the first inch of storm water on the site. Currently much of the storm water enters the Little River Canal. Acquiring the site would further the plan directive by restoring the site to its former natural relationship combining hammock, wetland glade and mangrove shoreline ecosystem.

The educational goals of the project will also contribute to the mitigation of human pollution of the river and groundwater, as detailed in other sections of this application. The Miami Comprehensive Plan policies that support this response are as folloes:

Policy NR-2.1.2: The City will continue to enforce building code requirements for retention of the first inch of storm water runoff.

Policy NR-1.1.3: Beginning in 1990, take actions to reduce the level of contaminants carried into Biscayne Bay via the Miami and Little Rivers, and by 1995 the level of contaminants within these water bodies will be reduced by at least 20 percent. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-1.1.3.) Policy NR-1.1.4: The City will continue to participate in the State funded SWIM program for funding support in order to reduce point and non-point sources of pollution into Biscayne Bay.

7. Does the proposed project further comprehensive plan directives that protect or restore aquatic vegetation including, but not limited to, aquatic weed control, restoration or creation of aquatic grass beds, or shoreline restoration? If so, summarize the relevant objectives or policies that are furthered. Provide the numeric citation of the relevant objectives or policies. Discuss how the project site would assist in furthering the cited objectives or policies. (5 points);

Little River shoreline west of the FEC railroad bridge would be returned to a more natural river lowland grade and repopulated with mangroves in addition to the existing pond apples. If feasible and consistent with South Florida Water Management District policies, the eastern shoreline would also be graded and a wetland glade would be recreated by replanting grasses, rushes and/or sedges that are characteristic of this environment.

Relevant MCPN policies include:

Objective CM-1.1: Preserve and protect the existing natural systems including wetlands and beach/dune systems within Virginia Key and those portions of Biscayne

21

Bay that lie within the City’s boundaries; and improve water quality within the Miami River, its tributaries, and the Little River.

Policy CM-1.1.9: Site development criteria will ensure that development or redevelopment with the coastal zone will not adversely affect the natural environment or lead to a net loss of public access to the City’s natural resources.

Policy CM-1.1.11: All City owned property within the coastal zone that may be identified as areas of significant or unique natural resources will be designated as Environmental Preservation Districts, and the City will also consider designating private properties within the coastal zone with significant or unique natural resources as Environmental Preservation Districts.

8. Does the proposed project further comprehensive plan directives that provide

additional public access to publicly-owned or publicly accessible natural areas including, but not limited to, water bodies, saltwater beaches, and to existing protected areas? If so, summarize the relevant objectives or policies that are furthered. Provide the numeric citation of the relevant objectives or policies. Discuss how the project site would assist in furthering the cited objectives or policies. (5 points);

The proposed Little River Preserve will increase access to the Little River shoreline, in accordance with the directive contained in Policy 1.1.12 of the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan:

Policy PR- 1.1.12: All City owned, waterfront property will provide for public open spaces that provide access to the shoreline by 1999. Objective CM-2.1: Prevent the net loss of, and, where feasible, increase, physical and visual public access to Biscayne Bay and the city's shoreline.

Because the proposed Little River Preserve is located on a river flowing through many jurisdictions in Miami-Dade County, several applicable policies of the Recreation and Open Space and Coastal Management elements of the Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) relevant to coastal and shoreline preservation are applicable:

Recreation and Open Space Element

3C. Through its park and recreation programs and all other available means, Dade County shall preserve and protect beaches and shores and maximize public ownership of these coastal resources. The County shall improve the maintenance of existing public park and recreation entrances and shall, where feasible, provide additional access points at waterfront and coastal locations.

4C. The County shall seek cooperative agreements such as the following with non-governmental organizations to provide additional resources for park acquisition, improvement, and programming priorities.

22

9. Does the proposed project provide for acreage or outdoor recreational facilities

necessary to maintain or improve adopted levels of service standards established in the comprehensive plan for outdoor recreation areas? If so, summarize the relevant objectives or policies that are furthered. Provide the numeric citation of the relevant objectives or policies. Identify the specific acreage or facility standards that are identified in the adopted level of service standards that would be maintained or improved. (10 points);

The project directly addresses open space and recreational deficiencies as listed in the MCNP. Little River Preserve is located in an area of the City where the need for open space and recreational facilities is critical. The project’s objectives are realistic and provide for a new park to service the adjacent residential communities. This park is unique in that it shall service two additional municipalities: the Villages of El Portal and Miami Shores.

The adopted Level of Service Standard (LOS) for recreation and open space in the City of Miami is 1.3 acres per 1000 residents. The proposed acquisition would help to meet those standards in this section of the community.

MCNP Policy LU-1.1.7: Land development regulations and policies will allow for the provision of adequate neighborhood shopping, recreation, day care, entertainment, and other neighborhood oriented support activities.

10. Does the proposed project further comprehensive plan directives that ensure the

provision of facilities for outdoor recreation activities including, but not limited to, nature trails or boardwalks, waterway trails, interpretive displays, educational programs, wildlife observation areas, or picnic areas? If so, summarize the relevant objectives or policies that are furthered. Provide the numeric citation of the relevant objectives or policies. Discuss how the project site would assist in furthering the cited objectives or policies. (5 points);

The project will provide nature trails, river walks, interpretive displays, educational programs, and wildlife observation areas. The site will be a passive recreation area and will provide opportunities for environmental education activities unique to this area. Relevant MCPN policies include:

Policy PR-1.1.2: Improve the quality and diversity of recreational programs offered at community parks.

Objective CM-2.1: Prevent the net loss of, and, where feasible, increase physical and visual public access to Biscayne Bay and the City’s shoreline.

Objective LU-1.5: Land development regulations will protect the City’s unique natural

coastal resources and its historic and cultural heritage. Objective PR-1.1: Increase public access to all identified recreational sites, facilities

and open space including rivers and beaches and enhance the quality of recreational

23

and educational opportunities for all age groups and handicapped persons within the City’s Neighborhoods.

Policy PR-1.1.6: All park renovation and expansion, or new parks will contain a provision for providing a program to ensure that in the development of new and the renovation of existing parks, the special recreation, education, and safety needs of preschool age children and the elderly within the services radius of park facilities are addressed.

Policy PR-1.1.11: Where appropriate, and in the interest of public safety and promotion of outdoor recreation opportunities on environmentally sensitive areas, future land development regulations will require non-water dependent or related development or redevelopment to maintain public access to the coastal and river shorelines.

Policy PR-1.1.12: All City-owned, waterfront property, including river shorelines, will provide for public open space that provide access to the shoreline.

Policy PR-1.1.14: Interpretative displays, educational programs, wildlife observation locations, and picnic areas will be encouraged in parks and open spaces for outdoor recreation activities.

24

Does the proposed project further future land use designations or comprehensive plan directives that provide for creating greenways consisting of environmentally sensitive lands or outdoor recreation opportunities? If so, summarize the relevant objectives or policies that are furthered. Provide the numeric citation of the relevant objectives or policies. Discuss how the project site would assist in furthering the future land use designations or cited The North Dade Greenways Plan was adopted in April, 1998 as part of the Dade County Long-Range transportation plan of the Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization (see Attachment G). Three greenways in this plan would be relevant to the Little River Preserve. First, the Flagler Trail would follow the FEC railroad line through the center of the Preserve. Second, following routes suggested in the City of Miami’s Upper Eastside Master Plan (see Attachment F and map Exhibit J-1), the Preserve could be linked to a greenway on the 79th Street Causeway. Third, the North Dade Greenways Plan discusses “blueways” following waterways. Such a route would have to be planned with care since much of the Little River Canal’s shoreline is built out and manatee aggregation sites have to be protected. However, there are options for routes which parallel the river and access it at a number of points. For such a route, the Little River Preserve would be a major access point as well as an important destination for walkers and bikers.

12. Does the proposed project further comprehensive plan directives that ensure the

preservation of historical sites? If so, summarize the relevant objectives or policies that are furthered. Provide the numeric citation of the relevant objectives or policies. Discuss how the project site would assist in furthering the cited objectives or policies. (5 points);

The site is one that spans the history and prehistory of South Florida, from Tequesta and then Seminole Indians, to the first settlers in the mid-1800s, to the ups and downs of the early 20th Century. It will continue to be historic as young people visiting the Preserve today and taking part in its programs will in the future tell their grandchildren how the struggle to save the manatees turned out. They will be able to tell of the efforts of the South Florida Water Management District to protect South Florida’s water supply from salinity intrusion and pollution, to keep the Everglades from drying out, and to protect Miami neighborhoods from floods. The Little River adjacent to the site is a key location in the effort to solve these complex problems.

Several City of Miami Comprehensive Plan provisions support this criterion—particularly Objective LU-2.5 and the sub-components thereof:

Objective LU-2.5: Increase public awareness of the historical, architectural, archaeological resources and cultural heritage of the city, and public policy and programs to protect and preserve this heritage, through public information and education programs.

Policy LU-2.5.1: The City will continue to develop a series of publications relating to historic preservation in general and the city's historic resources in particular. Policy LU-2.5.2: The City will maintain an historic marker program for designated properties and other key areas, and will publish same.

25

Policy LU-2.5.3: [Deleted 6/4/98 by Ordinance 11779.]

Policy LU-2.5.4: The City will continue to provide information on the city's historic, architectural and cultural heritage for inclusion in public information, economic development promotion and tourism materials. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-5.1.5.) The City's Policy LU-2.4.4 also supports this FCT application criterion.

Policy LU-2.4.4: By 1994, the City will enter into interlocal agreements with other local governments which have title to properties of major historic or architectural significance that will ensure the conservation, preservation and adaptive and sensitive reuse of such properties.

Relevant policy direction regarding historic and archaeological significant sites are addressed in both the Land Use and Recreation and Open Space elements of the Miami-Dade Comprehensive Development Master Plan. Relevant Land Use Element policies include:

6D. Public acquisition of historic and archaeological resources shall be pursued when public ownership would provide a major public benefit to the people of Dade County, when necessary financial resources can be secured, and when public acquisition is the last available resort.

6F. Dade County shall seek to develop technical, legal and financial incentive programs to encourage private sector participation in the preservation and protection of historical and archaeological resources.

6G. Dade County will assist municipalities in developing fully operational historic and archaeological resource preservation programs that meet the minimum standards set by the County's Historic Preservation Ordinance.

And applicable Recreation and Open Space policies include:

6B.Those portions of park properties containing important natural, historic, or archaeological resources will be developed and managed for long-term viability and integrity of the resource. Through its park and recreation programs the County shall, wherever feasible, acquire and reuse historic buildings and sites to benefit the public. Opportunities for public access to the resource will be developed in a manner which is consistent with the conservation or preservation of the resource.

13. How does the proposed project further comprehensive plan directives that

provide for coordination with existing resource protection plans, such as aquatic preserve management plans, SWIM plans, habitat conservation plans, manatee protection plans, and estuarine sanctuary plans? If so, summarize the relevant objectives or policies that are furthered. Provide the numeric citation of the relevant objectives or policies. Discuss how the project site would assist in furthering the cited objectives or policies. (5 points).

26

The proposed Little River Preserve strives to further comprehensive plan directives by restoring degraded ecosystems vital to the goals of existing resource protection plans that ensure clean water, protect Biscayne Bay and protect the habitat of the West Indian Manatee. Relevant policies include the following:

The adopted DERM Dade County Manatee Protection Plan designates the area of the Little River adjacent to the proposed Little River Preserve as "essential manatee habitat.” (See Attachment A, pg. 16). The Manatee Protection Plan notes that:

"Manatee aggregation areas need to be incorporated into the state or federal systems of refuges, parks, reserves and preserves in order to protect the manatee and other wildlife, as well as the coastal ecosystems in which they occur.” Policy 10B of the Plan states: Natural shoreline vegetation shall be maintained. Policy 4A: The listing of manatee aggregation sites for purchase by CARL (conservation and recreation lands), EEL (environmentally endangered lands), and/or the LATF (land acquisition and trust fund) are encouraged. The Little River and its outfall into the 79th Street and Julia Tuttle parts of the Bay are included in the Biscayne Bay SWIM Plan (see Attachment D). (2) Furtherance of Natural Resource Conservation, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor

Recreation [Rule 9K-4.008(2)(a-d), F.A.C.]

(a) Protection of Vegetative Communities. Ecologically viable natural vegetative

communities occur on the project site. 1. Does the project site consist of predominantly native forested or non-forested

vegetative communities that have not been subjected to significant disturbances or alteration as a result of current or past human activities? If so, describe the various vegetative communities on the project site, including the quality of the communities and the approximate acreage of each community. Describe the extent of the disturbances or alteration as a result of current or past human activities on the project site and the approximate acreage of the disturbed or altered area. (5 points);

The project site is upland hammock dominated by southern live oak and strangler fig along with other hammock species such as pigeon plum and red stopper. The western portion of river bank consists of mature pond apple trees. Mature strangler figs, live oak, gumbo limbo,

27

and sabal palms exist on the site, and occupy approximately 1.5 acres. It is probable that the eastern portion, approximately 0.5 acres, of the property was filled along the river front. Approximately 2.5 acres is open ground, with both native and exotic weeds and grasses dominating. Brazilian pepper and exotic palms are interspersed among the oaks and strangler figs (see map Exhibit F).

Significant human disturbance has occurred on the eastern half of the site due to the building of the FEC railroad track and the installation of the SFWMD salt intrusion dam. There are no shrubs or trees growing on this part of the site..

2. Does the project site contain a viable population of one or more listed plant species? If so, identify the listed plant species. Discuss the viability of the listed plant, including the approximate density or number of listed plants on the project site, how the plants will be protected, and who documented the plant species. (5 points);

Mature live oaks up to 48" diameter dominate the native species. Other species include strangler fig, gumbo limbo, red stopper, sabal palms, firebush and pond apples along the riverbank up to 12" diameter. Most of the natives occur along the perimeter of the site. Approximately (35) oaks, (3) gumbo limbos, (3) strangler figs, (12) sabal palms, (8) red stopper and (15) pond apples comprise the native species. Listed plant species are protected by Dade County and City of Miami tree ordinances. They will form the foundation of the restoration project. John Tomczak of Enviro Design Inc. helped identify the listed trees (see Exhibit F).

3. Does the project site contain one or more natural communities recognized by the

Florida Natural Areas Inventory as “imperiled” or “critically imperiled?” If so, describe the “imperiled” or “critically imperiled “ natural community. Discuss the viability of the community, including the quality of the community, the approximate size of the community in acres, how the vegetative community will be protected, and who identified the community. (5 points);

(Not applicable)

4. Will the degraded or altered vegetative communities, if any, that occur on the

project site be restored or enhanced to their natural state in terms of biological composition and ecological function? If so, discuss the extent of the degradation, the approximate acreage of the degraded area, and the extent of the restoration area in acres. Discuss how the area will be restored or enhanced to their natural state in terms of biological composition and ecological function. (5 points).

Phase One will seek funding for and neighborhood participation in a restoration project which would require removal of exotics and installation of native species appropriate to the high hammock environment. These would include live oak, gumbo limbo, pigeon plum, and sabal

28

palms on the western upland area, approximate 2 acres. The Little River shoreline on the north side would be returned to a more natural grade and repopulated with mangroves, preserving the existing pond apples. If feasible, the eastern shoreline would be graded, and a wetland glade would be recreated by replanting with grasses, rushes and/or sedges that are characteristic of this environment. (b) Protection of Wildlife. The project site protects wildlife populations or their

habitat. 1. Does the project site contain habitat recognized by appropriate state or federal

agencies as typically suitable for one or more listed animal species? If so, identify the listed species that may use the site and describe the habitat on the project site that the listed species would use. Discuss the viability of the habitat, including the quality of the habitat, the approximate size of the habitat in acres, how the habitat will be protected, and who identified the suitability of the habitat. (5 points);

Manatees are the most critically endangered wildlife at the site. They share the river with Florida soft-shell and other turtles and many fish – mullet and tarpon to name a couple. The banks are now an egg-laying area for soft-shells, but its current steepness makes it difficult for them to crawl up to their egg-laying sites. Site enhancements will help this. Alligators pass by occasionally but the realities of urban life are such that no effort will be made to encourage them. The area around the site still retains much of its oak hammock vegetation and thus provides a good habitat for birds. The Village of El Portal, just across the Little River from the site, has designated itself as a bird sanctuary. The existing stand of pond apples has many birds present all the time. Water birds which are present almost daily at the site include the great blue heron , green-backed heron, black and yellow crowned night herons, white ibis, cormorant, anhinga, common moorhen (gallinule), great egret, kingfisher, and (passing over) ospreys. Pie-billed grebes are seasonal residents. Twice in the last 10 years winter storms from Texas have brought white-fronted geese into the river. Land birds have a harder time coping with cats, racoons, and competition from fellow birds like mockingbirds and bluejays, but yellow-bellied sapsuckers, cardinals, various doves, various black birds, orioles, sparrows, and various hawks are present most of the time. The size of the habitat (about 2.5 acres will be devoted to original vegetation) will make it an ideal nesting place.. The species listed here were observed and photographed by Hugh Gladwin, an El Portal resident who lives across the river from the site. 2. Has one or more listed animal species been recently documented by

professionally accepted methods to use all or a portion of the project site as habitat? If so, identify the listed species. Discuss how the listed species using the site as habitat will be protected and who identified the listed species. (5 points);

29

The Little River next to the site is an aggregation and feeding area for manatees, Trichechus manatus latirostris (West Indian Manatee). They also congregate to wait for the gates on the control structure to open. With the various revitalization plans going on for the Biscayne Blvd/US1 corridor, commercial or residential construction on the site would be inevitable. Thus, acquisition and conversion to a passive neighborhood park would allow this vital habitat function to continue.

The project design will protect manatee aggregation areas from human contact. It is expected that the plan to be developed in Phase Two will include an observation platform which will enable viewing of manatees in a part of the river which is not an aggregation area. This is relevant to the Miami-Dade County Manatee Protection Plan (DERM Technical Report 95-5), particularly the following (p. 77):

Habitat Protection / Habitat Areas

Aggregation Areas

Any area where manatees frequently gather to rest, play, mate, nurse, or give birth shall be protected and/or enhanced. This protection shall occur through the Comprehensive Development Master Plan, zoning codes and ordinances and habitat acquisition by federal, state and local agencies where possible . . . . Such areas include but are not limited to Sky Lake, Biscayne Canal near the Miami Shores Country Club Golf Course, Little River west of Biscayne Blvd., northwest Virginia Key, upstream Miami River including Palmer Lake, upstream Coral Gables Waterway, and Black Point Marina Basin [italics added].

In an urban area where many thousands of people live in close proximity with an essential habitat for an endangered species like the manatee, public education is essential. Acquisition of land for the Preserve will enable the Oakland Grove Neighborhood Improvement Association to plan and seek funding for a learning center. This center will have classes and programs to promote understanding of the privilege and responsibilities area residents have in helping these animals survive.

The manatee sighting data gathered through numerous aerial surveys and tagging studies documenting the Little River as an important manatee habitat (Miami-Dade County Manatee Protection Plan: DERM Technical Report 95-5, p. 24).

3. Does the project site, alone or in conjunction with other adjacent conservation lands, support the recovery or maintenance of a significant population, as recognized by the appropriate state or federal agency, of one or more listed animal species? If so, identify the listed species and who documented that the project site supports the recovery or maintenance of a significant population. Discuss the viability of the listed species habitat, including the size and quality of the listed species habitat on the project site and on any adjacent conservation lands and how the listed species habitat will be protected. (5 points)

30

Most of the species discussed in answers (2-b-1) and (2-b-2) immediately above have difficulty maintaining significant population levels in the urban environment. The addition of such a large passive conservation area designed to provide habitat in the urban area should make a significant difference in local species population levels. The Little River itself creates a large area which, as a flyway, augments the site as a habitat.

In addition to planning the restoration of flora on the site with bird habitat suitability in mind, careful planning will be necessary to control predation by animals prevalent in the urban environment.

Public education is a critical part of creating a suitable habitat in an urban area. As noted elsewhere in this application, acquisition of land for the Preserve will enable the Oakland Grove Neighborhood Improvement Association to plan and seek funding for a learning center which would have classes and programs to educate and recruit people on the task of helping animal populations survive.

(c) Protection of Water Resources. The project site protects the quality and quantity

of surface and groundwater resources. 1. Will the quality of surface waters occurring on the project site be improved

through programs including, but not limited to, the elimination of pollution sources, or restoration of aquatic habitat? If so, discuss the restoration plan and the expected results. (5 points);

In the Biscayne Bay SWIM Plan 1995, the Little River is cited as a tributary to the Julia Tuttle Section (see Attachment D) with a history of poor water quality, partially due to pollution from runoff. Replanting of mangroves and the associated gradation of shoreline will reduce the amount of surface water runoff into the Little River. The restoration of the aquatic habitat of the river – an essential manatee aggregation area -- will also be promoted by shoreline restoration and other mitigation activities undertaken with the South Florida Water Management District and DERM.

Acquisition of land for the Preserve will enable planning for an important educational function at the site. The most important contribution of the site to surface water quality could well be through public education. Significant pollution of the Little River and surface water near the site now occurs due to trash dumping, leaking septic systems, garden/lawn fertilizer runoff, and automobiles leaking oil and other fluids. These sources of pollution cannot be addressed without mobilizing public support. It is likely that Phase Two fund-raising and planning efforts will have youth and education programs at the site’s Learning Center as a major objective.

31

2. Are any surface water resources occurring on or adjacent to the project site

designated as Class II waters, Outstanding Florida Waters, a National Estuary or Marine Sanctuary, aquatic preserve, wild and scenic river, or other local or state government special status designation intended to protect the natural resources and water quality of the waterbody? If so, provide a map showing the boundary of the Class II waters, Outstanding Florida Waters, a National Estuary or Marine Sanctuary, aquatic preserve, wild and scenic river, or other local or state government special status or provide a letter from the appropriate federal, state, or local government confirming that the project site is located within the designated boundary. Discuss the intention of the designation and how the project site will further the intent of the designation. (5 points);

(Not applicable.)

3. Does the project site protect high aquifer recharge areas or potable water supply areas as recognized by the applicable water management district, United States Geological Survey, or other local, state, or federal agencies? If so, provide a map showing the boundary of the high aquifer recharge areas or potable water supply areas or provide a letter from the appropriate federal, state, or local government confirming that the project site is located within the high aquifer recharge areas or potable water supply areas. Discuss the intention of the designation and how the project site will further the intent of the designation. (5 points).

(Not applicable.)

(d) Providing Outdoor Recreation. The project site provides for outdoor recreation

opportunities. 1. Will the project site be utilized as urban open space, located within a built-up

urban area and will be managed with as minimal disturbance as possible to the natural resources on the project site? If so, discuss the urban nature of the project site and how it will be managed with as minimal disturbance as possible to the natural resources on the project site including, the existing development around the project site. (10 points);

Yes, the proposed project site will be utilized as urban open space with minimal disturbance as possible to the site's natural resources. The proposed acquisition, at just about 4.5 acres, sits on the shoreline of the Little River, the north boundary line between the City of Miami and the Village of El Portal. The site is surrounded by single family homes on its western boundary and across the river in El Portal. On the east side of the river, high density rental apartments and a trailer park exist. Few open and green spaces exist within walking distance

32

of the site. As a neighborhood park, the Little River preserve would offer a service radius of at least one mile. This passive, waterfront park is within walking distance for more than 24,560 people (see map, Attachment E).

2. Will the proposed project provide nature trails, boardwalks, waterway trails,

wildlife observation areas, scenic overlooks, interpretive displays or other such facilities to promote outdoor recreation with as minimal disturbances as possible to the natural resources on the project site? If so, describe what facilities will be provided and discuss how they will be integrated into the project site with as minimal disturbances as possible to the natural resources on the project site. (10 points);

The proposed project site will be developed as a passive recreation and environmental education site. Once the restoration of the mangroves and other shoreline plant species along the Little River and the reintroduction of the native vegetation occurs, nature trails, scenic overlooks of the river for wildlife observation will be developed. Because the site already is disturbed, restoration and development activities will only enhance the environmental attributes and natural resource conservation of the Preserve.

3. Will the acquisition of the project site provide for new or enhanced access for

outdoor recreational or management purposes to other natural areas used for outdoor recreation including, but not limited to existing parks, greenways and waterways? If so, describe what additional areas will be accessed and what additional recreational or management benefits would accrue. (10 points);

Acquisition of the project site will provide new outdoor recreation opportunities in an area deficient of these opportunities. The site does not lend itself to active recreational facilities, rather it is suited to the restoration of native hammock and passive development to highlight its proximity to the historical Little River. With the eventual development of a North Dade Greenways Network (see Attachment G) the acquisition of this site will provide a key location for the proposed Flager Trail. The City of Miami’s Upper Eastside Master Plan also includes the site as a park in a series of parks and greenways (see Attachment F and map Exhibit J1).

4. Does the project site contain an intact salt or freshwater beach that will be

managed for recreation uses while preserving the natural character and functions of the project site? If so, identify the sites and discuss how the beach will be managed for recreation while protecting the natural features of the project site. (10 points);

(Not applicable)

33

5. Will the proposed project provide regularly scheduled and ongoing educational

programs on the project site to promote the protection of natural resources? If so, describe what type of ongoing natural resource educational programs are proposed and how often the programs would be scheduled. (10 points).

As noted elsewhere in this application, acquisition of land for the Preserve will create a unique setting for educational programs. During Phase One, these programs will likely consist of hands-on experiences concerning the removal of non-native plant species and the restoration of the natural vegetative habit. Programs will also involve the propagation and cultivation of some of the native species to be planted on the site, and learning about irrigation, pruning, control of exotics and maintenance of the various species. Simultaneously, students will study the history of the site and explore methods of plant removal, cultivation and uses early South Florida settlers -- for example, the difficult removal of palmettos. They could also learn about the process of manufacturing coontie roots into starch (a cash crop of early settlers in the area) that also was used to make arrow root pudding. As students study the various plants and ecosystems of a high hammock, a wetland glade and a mangrove shore, they will also explore the roles played by these ecosystems in preserving water quality and natural habitats for wildlife.

Working with local Miami-Dade Public Schools, such as Phyllis Miller Elementary School and Horace Mann Middle School, students will have the opportunity to discover the history of the area in which they live, as well as gain exposure to possible career choices for further study. The City of Miami is committed to providing on-going regularly scheduled programs of recreation that are compatible with the character of the project site.

The following City of Miami Comprehensive Plan provisions support this application criterion:

Goal PR-1: Provide adequate opportunities for active and passive recreation to all city residents.

Objective PR-1.1: Increase public access to all identified recreation sites, facilities and open spaces including the Miami River and beaches and enhance the quality of recreational and educational opportunities for all age groups and handicapped persons within the city's neighborhoods.

Policy PR-1.1.7: The City will establish a program to coordinate actions with nonprofit providers of social services to the elderly and the youth, so as to permit such providers to utilize public park facilities for meeting the recreation and education needs of the elderly and the youth.

Policy PR-1.1.9: The City will establish a program to coordinate actions with nonprofit social service agencies to permit the development of special recreation and education programs for the handicapped to be offered by such agencies at City facilities.

34

Policy PR-1.1.11: Where appropriate and in the interest of public safety and promotion of outdoor recreation opportunities on environmentally sensitive areas, future land development regulations will require non-water dependent or related development or redevelopment to maintain public access to the coastal and Miami River shorelines. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-2.1.1.) Policy PR-1.1.12: All City owned, waterfront property, including the Miami River shorelines, will provide for public open spaces that provide access to the shoreline. Policy PR-1.1.13: The City will incorporate provisions for public physical and/or visual access to the shoreline in its waterfront zoning regulations. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-2.1.7.)

Policy PR-1.1.14: Interpretative displays, educational programs, wildlife observation locations, and picnic areas will be encouraged in parks and open spaces for outdoor recreation activities by 2005. [Added 6/4/98 by Ordinance 11779.]

As the project develops in Phase Two, funding will likely be sought to build the Learning Center envisioned in the South Florida Regional Planning Council Charrette (see Attachment C) and classes could be held on a regular weekday and weekend schedule. As home to the Little River Historic Preservation Society, the center will also host historical seminars to share the history of the area and the personal histories of surviving pioneer families still residing in the area. (The Florida Folklife Program has expressed interest in training local volunteers how to conduct a personal history survey in the Little River area.)

Programs that address the importance of the Little River as an essential manatee habitat will involve the Save the Manatee. Other educational programs will involve the Agricultural Extension Service, the Department of Forestry and Turner Tech Agricultural Education Center.

(3) Innovative, Unique, and Outstanding Project Elements

[Rule 9K-4.008(3)(a-k), F.A.C.]

(a) Acquisition: Will the proposed project provide for alternatives to the acquisition of fee interests in land, including, but not limited to, acquisition of less than fee interest in a portion of the project site through conservation easements? If so, discuss what technique will be used. Discuss what portion of the site will be acquired under this techniques and the extent of public access to the area. (5 points).

(Not applicable)

(b) Management: Will the proposed project provide for innovative and outstanding

land and/or water management techniques or facilities design that promote

35

natural resource conservation, coastal management, or outdoor recreation? If so, list the innovative and outstanding management techniques or facilities design that promote natural resource conservation, coastal protection, or outdoor recreation. Discuss how these activities or facilities are innovative and/or outstanding and exceed what would be normally expected under best management practices for the project site. (5 points).

The Oakland Grove Neighborhood Improvement Association and its cooperating organizations such as the Sierra Club believe that natural resource conservation is the responsibility of all residents of Florida, and, that by involving those who live near the Little River Preserve in its realization, we will insure its long-term environmental impact. As participants take part in the restoration of the site to its natural state, they will become personally involved with preserving the habitat of wildlife that already live in the area. Through quality educational programs, the community will also become informed about the various plants and their roles within the larger South Florida ecosystem.

Unique to the project is its potential to involve the residents of several communities – the Little Haiti area of City of Miami, El Portal, Miami Shores and unincorporated Miami-Dade County -- in a regional project that they can all their own, thereby lessening geographical isolation and encouraging cross-cultural understanding. By sharing and celebrating the history and natural resources of the Little River Preserve, residents will the opportunity to accent their similarities and their mutual need to preserve the quality of life and the environment in which they live.

The City of Miami’s Upper Eastside Master Plan has a major objective of revitalizing this richly diverse area through participation in the shared environmental resources of the area. It includes the site as a park in a series of parks and greenways (see Attachment F and map Exhibit J1).

(c) Special Planning Initiatives. 1. Is the project site located within an Area of Critical State Concern as designated

pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes? If so, provide a map showing the boundary of the Area of Critical State Concern designation and the location of the project site or provide a letter from the Department of Community Affairs confirming that the project site is located within the boundaries of the Area of Critical State Concern. Discuss the intention of the designation and how the project site will further the intent of the designation. (5 points).

(Not applicable)

2. Is the project site located within a municipality or county that was designated as

a Sustainable Florida Community, pursuant to Section 163.3244, Florida

36

Statutes, and that has executed a contract with the Department? If so, provide a map showing the boundary of the Sustainable Florida Community designation and the location of the project site and a copy of the executed contract with the Department of Community Affairs. Discuss the intention of the designation and how the project site will further the intent of the designation. (5 points).

(Not applicable) 3. Is the project site located within the boundary of the Eastward Ho! Corridor,

pursuant to Executive Order 94-54, and as determined and approved by the corridor counties, South Florida and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Councils, and the Department? If so, provide a map showing the boundary of the Eastward Ho! Corridor and the location of the project site or provide a letter from the Department of Community Affairs or Regional Planning Council confirming that the project site is located within the boundaries of the Eastward Ho! Corridor. Discuss the intention of the designation and how the project site will further the intent of the designation. (5 points).

The proposed Little River Preserve is in the Eastward Ho! Corridor. See the attached letter by David Dahlstrom, Eastward Ho! Project Facilitator, and Eastward Ho! Corridor Map (Attachment B)..

The project site is in a neighborhood in the heart of the urban corridor. This area is ideally situated for enticing people to return to the urban setting to live, possibly in restored housing, rather than moving to the western suburbs. In order to entice people to live in the urban corridor, amenities must be provided to give people a high quality of life, and providing park and open space is critical to building livable communities. The site is the largest remaining open space in this area of the Little River. Its location on the River, as well as its archeological and natural resource importance, make it of special value to the immediate neighborhood and to the public's future access to the riverfront. A major initiative toward reaching this goal happened in 1998; the South Florida Regional Planning Council held an Eastward Ho! Planning Charrette in the area. The charrette identified the proposed Little River Preserve site as having great intrinsic environmental and historical value, as well as the potential to transform the image of the area and how different neighborhoods relate to each other and their shared environment. With the help of the plans developed by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the many volunteers who staffed the charrette, the concepts underlying this application were developed. Attached are pages from the charrette draft report on the Little River Preserve. It should be noted that these reflect a long-range vision; some of the included features such as a footbridge across the Little River may not be possible to incorporate under the current plan. (See Attachment C.) The Little River Preserve at this site will thus be an important focal point in the plans for the revitalization of this area of Northeast Miami-Dade County. 4. Is the project site located within the boundary of a Waterfront Florida

Community: said boundary must be described in a current contract between the

37

applicant and either the Department or the Department’s subcontracting grantee? If so, provide a map showing the boundary of the Waterfront Florida Community and the location of the project site or provide a letter from the Department of Community Affairs confirming that the project site is located within the boundaries of the Waterfront Florida Community. Discuss the intention of the designation and how the project site will further the intent of the designation. (5 points).

(Not Applicable)

5. Is the project site located within an area identified in the local government’s

Local Mitigation Strategy as a mitigation priority? If so, provide a map showing the mitigation priorities of the local government and a copy of the local government’s Local Mitigation Strategy document. Discuss the intent of the designation and how the project site will further the intent of the designation. (5 points).

The working group for Miami-Dade County’s Local Mitigation Strategy which includes the City of Miami has not yet mapped mitigation priority sites. However this site will undoubtably be included when such sites are identified. It is in the 100-year flood zone. Recent hurricane vulnerability maps done for the State LMS agree with residents of the area that even a category three hurricane will produce significant flooding of the area (see TAOS model map Exhibit M-3). (d) Unique Features and/or Historical Sites Features: Does the project site contain

unique natural features, or historical, archeological or cultural sites that are recognized by an appropriate agency or expert in the field? If so, discuss the quality of the unique natural features, or historical, archeological or cultural sites, the approximate size of the feature, how the feature will be protected, and which agency or expert in the field identified the feature. (10 points).

The Little River Preserve is located at the center of a geographical area that extends out in a 3 mile radius that has been known as "Little River" since it first appeared on Spanish maps of the 1400's. Prior to the arrival of the Spanish, the area's coastal ridge and river lowlands were home to the aboriginal Tequesta Indians, with the river and nearby Biscayne Bay providing them with a rich food source consisting of shark, turtle, and other sea-based animals. Remaining evidence of their inhabitation of this area is the Tequesta Burial Mound in El Portal, directly opposite the proposed site on the north side of the Little River (now marked by a historical marker). During archeological studies conducted by Miami-Dade County archeologists Dan D. Laxson in 1959 and Robert Carr in 1978 at the proposed Little River Preserve site, over 300 archeological artifacts were removed including ceramic sherds, shell tools and some perforated shark vertabrae from the Glades II and III periods.

38

The Little River Preserve site overlooks an important southward curve in the river which, although now significantly altered, historian Thelma Peters addresses in her book Lemon City, Pioneering on Biscayne Bay 1850-1925: "Early settlers claim Little River had a similar rapids [like those of the Miami River] during the rainy season. Little River had another oddity: flowing springs in the river itself, which doubled its volume and were known as the Five Iron Springs or, more commonly, the Boiling Springs....Early settlers describe how a small boat would whirl or be shunted aside by the force of the springs." The area on both sides of Little River had been described as an early "Indian town." After the Second Seminole War in the 1840s, Armed Occupation Act documents record the granting of this land to settlers as a deterrent to Indian hostilities. One sketch from 1843 indicates the nearby location of an "old mill" -- probably used to manufacture starch from coontie roots. As the desirability of the area and the productivity of the land drew in other settlers and mill owners in the 1800's, the river continued as an important means of travel, providing access to Biscayne Bay for settlers, as well as the Seminole population living upriver in the Everglades. In 1887, the land on the south side of Little River where it curves south then east (including the proposed Little River Preserve), was purchased by William Freeman, originally from Pennsylvania. Freeman built for his family a small frame house that also served as an Indian trading post, where he regularly ordered supplies for his family and the Indians from a treasured Montgomery Ward catalogue. Until a bridge was built across the Little River in 1891, he also operated a ferry service and built a large packing house for packing and shipping the tomatoes he raised -- so successfully that the size of his shipments was noted numerous times in the Metropolis (an early local newspaper) in the late 1890s. It was Freeman who sold several acres of river frontage to John J. and Francis M. Soar in 1894, who established one of the two first nurseries in Dade County on what is now the Little River Preserve site. Their descendants still live across the street from the Little River Preserve site. It is worth noting that historian Thelma Peters cites Freeman as an early environmentalist, as he "believed that nature maintained a natural balance. Birds should not be killed because they kept down insects." He was once quoted in the Metropolis saying, "...you see Nature knows her business and it's about as well to let her work things out her own way." William Freeman would undoubtedly have supported the establishment of the Little River Preserve and our effort to return these few acres to their natural ecological condition of the 1870s. In order to protect the archeological potential of this site, an archeological survey will be conducted to determine the precise dimensions and overall condition of the site. As the site is developed, all sub-surface disturbances will be performed under the guidance of and in consultation with the Miami-Dade County Archeologist and the City of Miami Historical Preservation Department. In further support of this application criterion, please see the special letter from our City Historic Preservation Officer in Attachment I.

39

(e) Multiple Benefits: Is the acquisition of the project site being pursued in conjunction and collaboration with other state, federal, local, or non-profit agencies acquiring adjacent lands? Will the multiple acquisition of these sites by multiple agencies provide synergistic benefits for resource conservation or outdoor recreation? If so, discuss how the acquisition is being coordinated with the other agencies and how the project site will provide synergistic benefits for resource conservation or outdoor recreation. (5 points).

(Not Applicable)

(f) Neighborhood Park. Is the entire project site less than 10 acres and located along

streets where people can walk or bike without encountering heavy traffic, or is the project site of a size defined as a neighborhood park in the local plan? If so, discuss how the project site will be used as a neighborhood park, how people can walk or bike without encountering heavy traffic, and whether the entire project site is less than 10 acres or is of a size defined as a neighborhood park in the local plan (provide copy of the local plan definition). (10 points).

The entire project site is less than ten (10) acres and meets the local definition of a neighborhood park. Primary users of the site will be from neighboring residential communities. Bordered on two sides by water from the Little River, the 4.5-acre site is situated at the end of a quiet residential street that does not carry heavy traffic. It is easily accessible by pedestrians as well as bicyclers from outside the immediate neighborhood, most notably from the Little Haiti, El Portal, Miami Shores and neighborhood along Biscayne Boulevard. With its eventual proximity to the Miami-Dade County Bike Paths (see Exhibit J-2) and routes proposed by the North Dade Greenways Plan (Attachment G), the project site will gain even greater accessibility. These are also important objectives of the City of Miami’s Upper Eastside Master Plan, which includes the site as a park in a series of parks and greenways (see Attachment F and map Exhibit J1).

(g) Urban Core Park. Is the project site surrounded by built up commercial,

industrial, or mixed use areas and does it function to intersperse congested urban core areas with open areas? If so, describe the existing development surrounding the project site and how the project site will function to intersperse congested urban core areas with open areas. (10 points).

Yes, the project site is located within an area characterized by mixed land uses of residential and commercial. Few open and green spaces alleviate the congestion of these somewhat depressed areas, which have been plagued by crime, noise and inconsistent development patterns. As a neighborhood park, the Little River Preserve would offer a service radius of at least one mile, providing recreation open space not only to the immediate neighborhood but also to Little Haiti, El Portal and Miami Shores. This passive, waterfront park is within

40

walking distance from more than 24,560 residents (Attachment E). In addition, as a confirmed "Eastward Ho!" corridor site, the Little River Preserve seeks to provide passive recreation space in an area of great need. It is also important that the revitalization planned by the City of Miami’s Upper Eastside Master Plan not be limited to wealthier residential areas along Biscayne Bay. Through including sites like that of the proposed Little River Preserve, the Master Plan includes and links through shared green spaces the less wealthy and more diverse in land use areas to the east of Biscayne Blvd. (see Attachment F and map Exhibit J1, existing land use map Exhibit I).

(h) Providing a Greater Share of the Match. The applicant is committed to providing

a greater percentage of a local match for an award. Up to 20 points based on the following:

The applicants will provide a local match for 50 percent of the project costs. (10 points).

(i) Greenway Network. Will the project enhance a local or regional network of

linked greenways by connecting two or more greenways, by extending existing greenways, or by contributing to closing gaps in existing greenways? If so, identify the sites in the greenway network, discuss the greenway network and supply supporting information. (10 points).

The North Dade Greenways Plan was adopted in April, 1998 as part of the Dade County Long-Range transportation plan of the Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization (see Attachment G). Three greenways in this plan would be relevant to the Little River Preserve. First, the Flagler Trail would follow the FEC railroad line through the center of the Preserve. Second, following routes suggested in the City of Miami’s Upper Eastside Master Plan (see Attachment F and map Exhibit J-1), the Preserve could be linked to a greenway on the 79th Street Causeway. Third, the North Dade Greenways Plan discusses “blueways” following waterways, one of which is the Little River.

(j) Project Excellence. Does the proposed project further natural resource

conservation, coastal management, outdoor recreation or growth management in a manner that cannot be adequately evaluated with the criteria established elsewhere in this rule chapter? If so, describe how the proposed project furthers natural resource conservation, coastal management, outdoor recreation or growth management in a manner that was not adequately evaluated with the

41

criteria established elsewhere in this rule chapter. Include documentation supporting this position. (up to 10 points).

Two things are essential if conservation and growth management are to work in an urban setting. One is that the public has to be involved and educated. The second is that different municipalities and jurisdictions have to get past viewing only their own immediate needs and start working together to plan solutions for the whole urban environment.

The educational and public participation aspects of the Little River Preserve project are primary objectives. From the South Florida Regional Planning Council sponsored charrette to the plans and fundraising activity proposed for Phase One of the project, community involvement and education is a key goal. And this application from the City of Miami, with its supporting letters from Miami Shores and El Portal, is evidence that municipalities in northeast Miami-Dade County are indeed working together to create a better managed urban environment with a higher quality of life for residents of all communities.

42

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. Provide the following information to assist the Trust in determining future needs of the program. (Submission of this information is voluntary and will not affect the applicant's ranking.) 1. What county is the project site located? Miami-Dade County 2. What is the name and address of the main newspaper that covers the area where

the project site is located? Name The Miami Herald Address 1 Herald Plaza City State Zip Code Miami, FL 33132 3. What is the Florida House of Representative district number that encompasses the project site? House District Number 108 4. What is the Florida Senate district number that encompasses the project site?

Senate District Number 36 5. What is the Regional Council district that encompasses the project site? Regional Council District South Florida Regional Planning Council 6. What is the Water Management District that encompasses the project site? South Florida Water Management District