105
Floodplain Design, Construction, and Impacts On Flood Insurance

Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Floodplain Design, Construction, and Impacts On Flood Insurance

Page 2: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

AIA/CES Registration

Architectural Record is a registered provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems. Credit earned on completion of this program will be reported to CES records for AIA members. Certificates of completion for non‐AIA members are available on request.

This program is registered with the AIA/CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product. 

Page 3: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Copyright Notice

This presentation is protected by US and international copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, display and use of the presentation without written permission of the speaker is strictly prohibited.

Page 4: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Course Description

Floods are the #1 natural disaster in the United States. All 50 states have experienced floods or flash floods.Due to climate change and other factors, flood events are increasing in number and intensity. To protect the health, safety, and welfare of homes and their occupants during a flood event, homes must be built into compliance with local, state, and federal codes and regulations.

This course describes floodplains and the potential hazards to buildings. Unless there are flood openings that allow floodwaters to flow into and out of enclosures below the Base Flood Elevation, hydrostatic pressure builds up on the foundation walls and can cause major damage. The course also defines the differences in engineered and non‐engineered flood openings and their ability to ensure resilient structures. It explains the differences between wet floodproofing and dry floodproofing techniques, and when they are applicable. 

It also clarifies the regulations, codes, and standards as they relate to sustaining foundations in flood hazard areas. This course analyzes the role of building compliance in lowering flood insurance rates and what mitigation solutions are available to existing structures.

Page 5: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Learning Objectives

By the time you have completed this educational unit, you will be 

able to:

• Describe floods, floodplains, and the potential hazards to buildings

• Explain the differences between wet and dry floodproofing techniques

• Identify regulations, codes, and standards as they relate to sustaining foundations in flood hazard areas

• Define the differences in engineered and non‐engineered flood openings and their ability to ensure resilient structures

• Analyze the role of building compliance in securing lowering flood insurance rates and what mitigation solutions are available

Page 6: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

FEMA Best Practice Story Video

Page 7: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Course Outline

Section 1Floods, floodplains,

and building foundations 

Section 2Wet vs. Dry 

Floodproofing

Section 3Regulations, codes, 

and standards 

Section 4Flood openings for building resilience

Section 5Building complianceand insurance rates

Page 8: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Section 1FLOODS, FLOODPLAINS, AND BUILDINGS

Page 9: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Basic Terms

• Base Flood Elevation (BFE): The calculated level flood waters will rise during a Base Flood

• Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)

‐ AE & A1‐30 Zones: Have established BFE’s and low impact from waves

‐ VE & V1‐30 Zones: Have established BFE’s and impact from storm induced waves. 

Note: Both A and V zones subject to experiencing a 1% annual chance flood event. This translates to a 26% chance of flooding over the life of a 30‐year mortgage.

• Freeboard: Elevating a building’s lowest floor above and beyond BFE. This is a built‐in safety factor resulting in lower flood insurance premiums. This elevation is required in certain communities with height requirements that vary. 

Page 10: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Flood Zone Determination

Flood Zones change over time. Here are resources to determine if a property is located within a Flood Zone and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE):

• FEMA Flood Map Service Center (MSC)• Flood Insurance companies• Hydrology Firms• Other websites that specialize in this

Page 11: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

The Cost of Flooding: Contents

Calculation for 1 in. flood in 2,000 sq. ft. home built on slab foundation.

Source: National Flood Insurance Program Flood Calculator

Page 12: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 13: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 14: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 15: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Effects of Lateral and Vertical Hydrostatic Force

Hydrostatic force is so damaging that NFIP Regulations state that a community shall:

“Require, for all new construction and substantial improvements, that fully enclosed areas below the lowest flood that are usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or storage in an area other than a basement and which are subject to flooding shall be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwaters.”

Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, in Section 60.(c)(5)

Page 16: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 17: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 18: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 19: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 20: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 21: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Emergency Operation Plan – TB-3 pg. 4-5

• Establish the chain of command & responsibilities 

• Procedure for notifying necessary parties 

• A list of specific duties & location of all dry floodproofing materials

• Evacuation plan: with and without duties

• Annual training drills with community officials

Page 22: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Annual Inspection & Maintenance Plan – TB-3 pg. 5

• Mechanical equipment, sump pumps & generators 

• Inspect & test all flood shields (check gaskets)

• Inspect foundation walls for cracks

• Levees & berms

Page 23: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

NFIP Requires For Dry Floodproofing Credit

• Floodproofing Certificate

• Written certification that the Engineer of Record (EOR) design & construction meet ASCE‐24 standards

• Comprehensive Maintenance Plan– Checking gaskets, gates and barriers

• Emergency Action Plan

• Certification from the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) that they have inspected and issued CO

Page 24: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Floodplain Impact Consideration

• Increased flood depths, velocities, and flows

• Growing the floodplain

• ASFPM: No Adverse Impact

– The action of one property owner or community does not adversely affect another

– The goal is to prevent the growth and spread of the floodplain

Page 25: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Wet Floodproofing

Page 26: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Elevation for New Construction and Substantial Improvements

• Zone A must have the lowest floor elevated to or above the BFE.

• Zones V must be elevated on pilings and columns so that the bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member of the lowest floor is elevated to or above the BFE.

• Elevation techniques

Page 27: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Wet Floodproofing (Relieve) Required for Residential

• Flood Openings equalize the hydrostatic pressure

• Used in both residential and non‐residential structures

• For new construction or substantial improvements to existing buildings

• Required in A, AE, A1‐A30, AO, & AH Zones

• Required within Breakaway Walls in V‐Zones per ASCE 24

• ICC‐ES Certified Options

Page 28: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Purpose of a Flood Opening

Page 29: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 30: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy

Non‐Residential Considerations:

• Wet vs. Dry

• Design differences and costs

• Active vs. passive approaches and techniques

• Local floodplain ordinances

• Health, safety, and welfare of the occupants

• Costs, Liability, Impacts

Residential Must Wet Floodproof

Page 31: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

REGULATIONS, CODES, AND STANDARDSSection 3

Page 32: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Floodplain Design and Construction Regulations, Codes & Standards

ASCE 24FEMA TB 3‐93FEMA TB 1‐08 IRC® IBC®

Page 33: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Definitions: What Is an Enclosure?

“Enclosure: That portion of an elevated building below the lowest elevated floor that is either partially or fully shut in by rigid walls.”

— Flood Insurance Manual 

FEMA TB‐1 Page 6  

Page 34: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Definitions: Crawlspaces

Page 35: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Definitions: Full Height Enclosures, Townhouses

Page 36: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Definitions: Attached Garages

Page 37: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Definitions: Detached Accessories (Regulated as Enclosures)

Regulated as Enclosures

Page 38: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Floodplain Design, Construction, and Flood Insurance Solutions

Definitions: Enclosures in V-Zones

ASCE 2.7.1.1 Openings in Breakaway Walls

Openings to allow the automatic entry and exit of floodwaters during design flood conditions shall be installed in breakaway walls in all flood hazard areas.

Page 39: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 40: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 41: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 42: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 43: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

FLOOD OPENINGS FOR RESILIENCESection 4

Page 44: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

• It relieves (rather than resists) hydrostatic pressure on foundation walls during a flood event. The flood vent must allow for the automatic entry and exit of flood waters without human intervention

• Passively equalizes hydrostatic loads on enclosure walls below the BFE

• Must allow bi‐directional relief of the flood waters regardless of the direction of flow

• Use of foundation flood vents in known as a "wet floodproofing” technique

• Engineered & Non‐engineered Options

What is a Foundation Flood Vent?

Page 45: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Documented In

Page 46: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 47: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Non-Engineered Openings

• “Not designed” flood openings

• Come equipped with obstructions to flow as there is a minimum screen requirement per code

• Should provide 1 sq. in. of NET open area for every 1 sq. ft. of enclosed area

• An 16 in. x 8 in. hole with air vent device inserted does NOT provide 128 sq. in. of open area

• You must account for obstructions to flow

• Liability rests with design professional, surveyor, construction official 

Page 48: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

NEW ASCE 24-14 Standards Further Clarify

This covering and other louvers, blades, grills and faceplates put air vents into a partially obstructed category which carries a coefficient of discharge of .20. Using .20 in the calculations yields A= .83 sq.in for every 1 sq. ft. of area which is rounded to 1 sq. in. of net open area for every 1 sq. ft. of enclosed space. 

Page 49: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Engineered Vent vs. Non-Engineered Opening

• Example of an Engineered Flood Vent —It has 200 sq. ft. of rated flood protection.

• Example of a Non‐Engineered Opening —It has 42 sq. in. net, if permanently disabled in the open position.

Page 50: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

The Math on Non-Engineered Vents

• Footprint is 30 ft. x 40 ft. = 1,200 sq. ft.

• 1200/42 sq. in. = 29 total vents required

Page 51: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Unacceptable Measures

According to FEMA TB‐1, unacceptable measures that will not qualify as flood openings include:

• Standard foundation air ventilation devices that can be closed manually, unless they are permanently disabled in the open position 

• Standard foundation air ventilation devices that are designed to open and close based on temperature. 

• Windows below the BFE

• Garage doors without openings installed in them

• Standard exterior doors without openings installed in them

Page 52: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Debris is a Fact of Flood

Page 53: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Non-Engineered Openings: Issues

According to FEMA TB‐1 pg. 20: "Non‐Engineered Openings: Communities that administer the IBC or the IRC  should note the requirement to cover ventilation openings to keep animals and insects from entering. The commentaries that accompany those codes note that some covering materials may reduce the gross open area of the vent by as much as 50 percent.”

Pictured: Typical air vent clogged by flood debris

Photo Credit: FEMA TB 1 ‐08

ASCE 24: Commentary pg. 45

Page 54: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Engineered Openings

A Performing Engineered Opening mechanically operates, automatically activated to reveal an un‐obstructed opening during design flood with a minimum unobstructed opening of 3”. 

Because a rodent screen is required by ICC code for any under floor opening it requires a Engineered Opening to go from a obstructed opening to a unobstructed opening when activated.

Flood door closed, obstructing the opening.

Flood door activated, reveals an un‐obstructed opening.

Page 55: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Engineered Openings: Passive Relief

• Engineered Opening – An Engineered Opening  is a mechanical opening, which is activated by water during a flood revealing an unobstructed area for which floodwater can flow through to equalize the hydrostatic loads on the enclosure wall. 

• These openings are performance tested and certified to cover a square footage amount. They have an ICC‐ESCertificate.

Pictured: Engineered flood vent following Hurricane Ida (2009)

Page 56: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

ICC-ES Engineered Openings

• Designed, Tested, & Certified for performance 

• Designed and certified based on computations (TB1 and ASCE 24)  

• ICC‐ES Certified: AC‐364 (MOFV)

• 3”min dimension for debris flow 

Page 57: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 58: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 59: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 60: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 61: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 62: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 63: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 64: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 65: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 66: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

COMPLIANCE AND INSURANCE RATESSection 5

Page 67: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

National Flood Insurance Program (FEMA)

• NFIP (National Flood Insurance Program)Managed by FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency of the US Government

• An objective of the NFIP is to protect buildings constructed in floodplains from structural damage caused by flood forces

• NFIP Regulations include building design criteria that apply to new construction and substantial improvements to existing buildings in Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs). 

• Nearly 20,000 communities participate in the NFIP by enforcing floodplain management ordinances. In exchange, the NFIP offers federally backed flood insurance. 

• High Risk = High Premium

Page 68: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

NFIP Components and Coverage Limits

The NFIP balances three related program areas:

– Flood Hazard Identification (mapping)

– Flood Insurance (provision of low‐cost insurance for property owners in participating communities)

– Floodplain Management (regulations such as building codes and zoning)

NFIP Coverage Limits

• One to four‐Family Structures– $250,000 building– $100,000 contents

• Business structures – $500,000 building– $500,000 contents 

Page 69: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Why NFIP Reform

Goal: Become Fiscally Sound Again

• 2005 (Katrina): Premium generated $1.9 billion

• 2012 (Sandy): Premium generated $3.3 billion

Page 70: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Changing Landscape

• 2012 Biggert ‐ Waters Reform (BW‐12)

• 2014 Grimm – Waters AKA: Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act (HFIAA)

• Actuarial Rates Phased in – Non‐Primary Residences– Severe Repetitive Loss – Business Properties18‐25%

Page 71: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

FEMA Recommends

What Can Be Done to Lower Costs?For home owners and business owners:

• Talk to your insurance agent about your insurance options

• You will need an Elevation Certificate to determine your correct rate

• Consider incorporating flood mitigation into your remodeling or rebuilding– Building or rebuilding higher will lower your risk and could 

reduce your premium– Consider adding vents to your foundation or using 

breakaway walls

• Talk with local officials about community‐wide mitigation steps

Page 72: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Key to Success: Think Like an Insurance Agent

Page 73: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Mitigation Works

Flood Loss Control Solutions

Proper Flood Openings Raising Mechanicals Freeboard Eliminating Subgrade Spaces

Incredible Savings After Mitigation 83%ROI: 2 YearsIn many cases clients receive refund checks for that years policy. 

Page 74: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Freeboard: Flood Insurance Premium Discounts

Average NFIP Rates ($250,000 structural and $100,000 contents with a $1,250 deductible): This is based on a crawlspace building – where the crawlspace is adequately vented and the rate is from the first habitable floor, and there are 2 habitable floors.

‐4 $7,775.00‐3 $6,285.00‐2 $4,265.00‐1 $3,185.00

0 $1,585.00

+1 $885.00 44% decrease+2 $680.00 57% decrease+3 $610.00 61% decrease+4 $605.00 62% decrease

Page 75: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Elevation Certificates

• Last check point before CO is granted• Surveyor completes• Sections A8 & A9 flood vent info• EC required for actuarial rating

Required For:1. Building Department for compliance2. Flood Insurance Rating

Top Issues That Cost Clients‐ Non‐compliant Flood Openings‐ Sub‐grade spaces‐ Not utilizing enclosed areas correctly (finishing)

EC is needed to identify non‐compliance and offer mitigation options to lower risk. 

Page 76: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

EC Documentation

Page 77: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Summary: Mitigation for Lower Insurance Rates

• Flood Loss Control Solutions: – Eliminate Sub Grade Spaces– Raise Mechanicals– Free Board– Install Proper Flood Vents– Elevation Certificate Documentation

• Buildings constructed in compliance with NFIP standards:– Suffer approximately 80% less damage annually than those not in compliance*– Achieve greater resiliency – Receive lower NFIP Flood Insurance ratings which translates into lower premiums than those not in 

compliance

* Source: www.floodsmart.gov

Page 78: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Case Study: House Lifted 4 ft. Above BFE

• Lifted Home in 2004

• Primary Residence

• Current BFE 8 ft.

• Has paid over $15,000 for NFIP Insurance over 10 years

Page 79: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 80: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive
Page 81: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

“Bingo” Needs Vents

Retrofitting (6) ICC‐ES Certified Engineered Flood VentsCost: $2,500 

Page 82: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

House Lifted 4’ Above BFE

BFE 8’

Bottom Floor 3.5’ (‐4) Rating 

Page 83: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

House Lifted 4’ Above BFE

Next Higher Floor 11.7’ With Retrofit (+4) Rating BFE 8’

Bottom Floor 3.5’ (‐4) Rating 

Page 84: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Result

+4 Rating86% ReductionROI: 1.5 years

Old Premium = $2,038 New Premium = $281

10 year total for coverage should have been: $2,810*Actually Paid: $15,000+

Page 85: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Thank you!

Thank you for your time.

This concludes the AIA Continuing Education System Program.

Questions? Contact us at: www.smartvent.com

Phone: 877‐441‐8368

Email: [email protected]

Page 86: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

86

Dry Floodproofing Partner 

Page 87: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Flood Protection

Flex-Gate™ Stairwell

Resilient Tunnel Plugs

87ILC Dover Proprietary Information

Flex-Cover™

Portal GatesPlugsCovers Walls

Vertical Flex-Wall™

Flex-Gate™ Portal

Flex-Gate™

RTP

Pipe Plugs

Side Deploy Flex-Wall™

Flex-Wall™

Page 88: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Side Deployed Flex-Wall™

88ILC Dover Proprietary Information

‐ 12’ tall x 16’ wide wall challenged with 10’ of water‐ Skirt is anchored to ground with clamping plates‐ Deployment in 20 minutes with 2 people

(Clamped Skirt)

Page 89: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Flex-Wall™

89ILC Dover Proprietary

Packed

 in Trench

Remov

e Co

vers

Mou

nt Posts

Raise Flexible 

Wall &

 Ten

sion

Point of Use Storage (Vertical)

Page 90: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Packing Volume

Approximately 8ft of highly reinforced wall fits into a volume of 8in x 8in

The wall can be rolled, Z‐Folded (as shown), or packed randomly

The wall is comprised of a high strength webbing net (impact and water load capable), and a coated fabric water barrier

Page 91: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Impact Testing

91 ILC Dover Proprietary Information

Leakage: Measured 0.10 GPM per linear foot  of seal at 3ft challenge (4ft pressure head at base of trench). Requirement of 0.5 GPM per linear foot (MTA DG 312).

‐ 4’ tall (5’ to bottom of trench) x 16’ wide wall challenged with 3’ of water

‐ 8ft spans tested, but wider spans possible

‐ Deployment in 10 minutes with 1 person

Page 92: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Vehicular Entrance Application

Page 93: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

View 1

View 2

A Flex‐Wall™ is stored in each of the containers, and a joining wall is added between the container and the yard wall. Bollards are added to  help support the wall when deployed so that it doesn’t impact the gate.

A center post is removed from the container and bolted to a ground receiver at mid‐span.

Storage Container (each side) New Bollards

93ILC Dover Proprietary Information

Page 94: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Point of Use Storage (Side Deploy)

Storage Container with Hinged Door open

End Post

Flex‐Wall™

Guide Wire Cable (Option)

(middle and bottom Cables and Center Support Post not shown but would be here as well)

Page 95: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

View 4

Cables are drawn from the opposite side container and attached to the center post. The cables are then tensioned using the ratchet mechanism on the center post.

View 3

Cables are drawn from the container on the left and attached to the center post.

95ILC Dover Proprietary Information

Page 96: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

View 5

View 6

The Flex‐Walls™ are drawn from the containers and attached to the center post.  Each panel overlaps itself at the width of the center post to augment sealing.

The skirt, which is attached to the Flex‐Wall™ panels during deployment, is detached from the wall and positioned.  Ballasting on the skirt or bolting it to receivers hold it in place and apply pressure to a sealing material on the bottom of the skirt.

96ILC Dover Proprietary Information

Page 97: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Flex‐Wall Seal 

Page 98: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Flex‐Gates ™

Page 99: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Vertically Deployed Flex-Wall™

Page 100: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Stored in Place

Page 101: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Flex-Wall™ Deployed

Page 102: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Flex-Wall™ Vertical System is stored in a trench with a plate to conceal

Page 103: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

1st Step of Installation is to remove plates

Page 104: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

2nd step is to install any required strengthening posts. This will vary per project requirements

Page 105: Floodplain Design, Construction...Considerations for Floodproofing Strategy Non‐Residential Considerations: • Wet vs. Dry • Design differences and costs • Active vs. passive

Final step is to attach Flex-Wall™ via plates and bolts to received hardware attached to building