FLHSR Industry Forum 110810-Web

8/8/2019 FLHSR Industry Forum 110810-Web

1/127

FLORIDA HIGH SPEED RAIL INDUSTRY FORUM

NOVEMBER 8-9, 2010


2/127

Overview of Florida High Speed Rail Program

History and Vision

Federal Applications and Results

Phase I: Tampa - Orlando Status Report

DBE/MBE Participation and Opportunities Phase II: Orlando Miami


3/127

Phase I: Tampa-Orlando Status Report

1. Right of Way /Permitting

2. Ridership Study

3. Early Works Contracts

4. Prelim Engineering

5. Rail Systems and Operations

6. Rule of ParticularApplicability (RPA)

7. Station Concepts

8. Procurement

9. Funding and Financing


4/127

History and Vision

Florida Transit

Corridor Study

1976

Governor

Bob Graham

Visits Japan

1982

Florida

High Speed Rail

Commission

1984

Florida Legislature

Enacts the New

High Speed Rail Act

1992

FOX Begins Preliminary

Engineering and

Environmental Activities

1998

Constitutional Amendment

on High Speed Rail

Approved by Florida Voters

2000

High Speed Rail

Authority Issues

Vision Plan

2001


5/127

History and Vision

2001 Vision Plan


6/127

History and Vision

2009 Vision Plan


7/127

Federal Applications and Results

2009: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

Total available: $8 billion

Tampa Orlando: $1.25 billion

2010: HSIPR Service Development Program

Total available: $2.5 billion

Tampa Orlando: $800 million + State match up to $280 million

TOTAL TAMPA-ORLANDO: $2.35 BILLION


8/127

Florida High Speed Rail Program Organization Chart


9/127

Early Works Contracts

Objectives

Clear corridor for later HSR construction

Discover unforeseen conditions on smaller contract

Create jobs soon no HSR experience

Procurements

Five separate contracts, staggered dates (EW#1 this month),

approximately $170 million total

Work complete in advance of HSR construction

Four of five: Design-Build Best Value; one D-B-B

See Early Works Project Overview Memorandum: www.floridahighspeedrail.org

OVER 2,000 JOBS IN

2011-2012


10/127

PPP ProcurementDesign-Build-Operate-Maintain and Finance

Allows for optimal and appropriate transfer of key

project risks

Public sector role:

Fund major infrastructure component

Protect public interests

Private sector role: Assumption of ridership revenue risk

Long term operations and maintenance

Two step procurement process: Request for Qualifications

Request for Proposals

Stipend: $2 million for unsuccessful teams if responsive

OVER 20,000 JOBS IN

2012-2015

APPROX 1,000PERMANENT

DIRECT JOBS


11/127

Orlando-Miami

Prelim Schedule

Tampa-Orlando

EW Contract 1

EW Contract 2

EW Contract 3

EW Contract 4

EW Contract 5

DBOM&F

Florida High Speed Rail Schedule (subject to approvals)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Procurement & Award

Design/Build Construction

Operate & Maintain

NEPA/PD&E


12/127

Phase I: Tampa-Orlando Status Report

1. Right of Way /Permitting

2. Ridership Study

3. Early Works Contracts

4. Prelim Engineering

5. Rail Systems and Operations

6. Rule of ParticularApplicability (RPA)

7. Station Concepts

8. Procurement

9. Funding and Financing


13/127

Right-of-Way/Permitting


14/127

Right-of-Way (ROW)

Approximately 92% of all needed ROW is available

Remaining 8% going through acquisition process

No right of way required for Early Works contracts

All right of way scheduled to be available atstart of DBOM&F

Florida statutes allow start of Design-Build contracts

without all ROW in hand no work allowed in areas

not yet available


15/127

Right-Of-Way: Downtown Tampa


16/127

Right-Of-Way: Beachline(Convention Center Station)


17/127

Right-Of-Way: Taft-Vineland Road


18/127

Right-Of-Way: Tradeport Area


19/127

Right-Of-Way: Boggy Creek Road


20/127

Environmental Approvals

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) lead agency

Final Environmental Impact Statement signed and Record of

Decision issued

Supplemental EIS update material being compiled based on

Preliminary Engineering FRA concurrence anticipated

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Record of Decision required

Preliminary Engineering and other documentation being

compiled to achieve ROD

Other Agency Permits

Goal: obtain all construction permits in advance; status of each

will be included in RFP


21/127

Ridership Study


22/127

Ridership Study

Work ScheduleFlorida High Speed Rail Ridership/Revenue Forecasts - Tampa - Orlando

Project Organization and Kick-off Meeting

Update Zones, Networks, Demographics

Investigate Potential Transit Access Services

Canvas Potential HSR Partners

Airport O-D Surveys

Roadside O-D Surveys

Stated Preference Surveys

Model Development and Forecasts

Ongoing

Data Collection Deadline

November December January February

Completed

Task Name July August September October


23/127

Survey Research and Data Collection Elements

Investment Grade Ridership Study:

Estimate the number of trips that are made within

the service corridor

Determine the likely share of those trips that would use

the high speed rail under different service conditions

Market Enhancement: Understand how marketing packages could affect

ridership and revenue


24/127

Survey Overview

Trip Characteristics

Stated Preference Scenarios

Debrief and Opinion

Household Demographics


25/127

Design of Transportation SP Surveys

For this project, we adapt the survey questionnaire

to deal with the types of trips made by nine primarytraveler segments:

Resident commuters

Resident business

Resident other Visitor business

Visitor other

International intercity

Airport access business

Airport access other

Airport access international


26/127



27/127


Early Works #1 (A-F)

Early Works #2 (G)

Early Works #3 (H)

Early Works #4 (J)

Early Works #5 (K)


28/127

Early Works Contracts and Scope

Contract 1: I-4 Median Preparation

Minor I-4 widening in 12 locations

Relocation of ITS, overhead signs, and lighting elements that

conflict with HSR (I-4 and SR 528)

Replacements of select drainage culverts in poor condition

Tentative schedule (subject to FRA approval) Adjusted ScoreDesign-Build

Advertisement Date November 15, 2010

Shortlist Date December 14, 2010

Technical Proposals Due January 25, 2011

Bid Opening February 21, 2011


29/127


Contract 2: SR 559 Interchange Project

Rail Geometry improvement clearance requirements

SR 559 Bridge replacement

1.77 miles of I-4 EB realignment

WMD permit to be provided

Tentative schedule (subject to FRA approval) Adjusted ScoreDesign-Build

Advertisement Date December 20, 2010

Shortlist Date January 26, 2011

Technical Proposals Due March 16, 2011

Bid Opening April 26, 2011


30/127

Early Works Contract 2 (I-4/SR 559 Interchange Reconstruction)

SR5

59

1.7 miles of I-4 EB

realignment0.9 miles of SR 559

reconstruction

3-span bridge

reconstruction


31/127


Contract 3: CR 557 Interchange Project

Rail Geometry improvement clearance requirements

CR 557 Bridge replacement

2.0 miles of I-4 EB and WB realignment plus

1.3 miles of widening

WMD permit to be provided Tentative schedule (subject to FRA approval) Adjusted Score

Design-Build

Advertisement Date January 10, 2011

Short List Date February 15, 2011

Technical Proposals Due April 11, 2011

Bid Opening May 23, 2011


32/127

Early Works Contract 3 (I-4/CR 557 Interchange Reconstruction)

CR5

57

2.0 miles of I-4 EB

and WB realignment

1.3 miles of I-4 EBand WB widening

1.0 miles of CR 557

reconstruction

3-span bridge

reconstruction


33/127


Contract 4: Maintenance Site Preparation

Maintenance yard site near Orlando Airport contains muck

Clear, de-muck, backfill and surcharge as necessary within

92 acre site

Relocation of existing 24 Force Main

Tentative schedule (subject to FRA approval) Traditional design-bid-build

Advertisement Date June 24, 2011

Letting Date August 24, 2011


34/127

Early Works Contract 4 (Maintenance Facility Site Preparation)

DE-MUCKING

AREA

CLEAR AND

BACKFILL


35/127


Contract 5: WB I-4 realignment SR 417 to Osceola Parkway

Realignment of 1.7 miles of I-4 WB into Ultimate I-4 location

Reconstruction of EB US 192 to I-4 ramp bridge

WMD permit to be provided

Tentative schedule (subject to FRA approval) Adjusted Score

Design-Build

Advertisement Date January 31, 2011

Shortlist Date March 8, 2011

Technical Proposals Due May 2, 2011

Bid Opening June 13, 2011


36/127

Early Works Contract 5 (WB I-4 realignment SR417 to Osceola Parkway)

1.7 miles of

I-4 WB realignment

0.5 miles of ramp

realignment

2-span ramp bridge

reconstruction


37/127

Preliminary Engineering


38/127


39/127

Ultimate I-4 Corridor

GeneralPurpose

Lanes

GeneralPurpose

Lanes

FutureManaged

Lanes

FutureManaged

Lanes

44 Min.HSR

Envelope

NaturalGround

NaturalGround


40/127

Tight Section In I-4 Median


41/127

Retaining Wall Section

d


42/127

Viaduct

i d ( il )


43/127

HSR Viaducts (17 miles)

Superstructure Alternatives:

Materials (Concrete/Steel)

Geometry (Single Box/Twin Boxes)

Track (Ballasted/Ballast-less)


44/127

HSR Viaducts/Straddle Bent

12 Locations


45/127

HSR Viaducts/C-Pier

10 Locations

/


46/127

Bridges Over Local Roads/Creeks

29 Locations

2 Miles


47/127

Bridge Aesthetics

Under Development for Corridor Structures:

Bridges/Viaducts

Retaining Walls

Catenary Poles Fencing

Minimum requirements to be included in RFP

Clearance Requirements


48/127

Clearance Requirements

SPEED H V

MAX 110 MPH 9 MIN. 19 MIN.

111 MPH 150 MPH 10-4 21.5

>150 MPH 10-4 MIN. 23 MIN.

Bridge Pier Reconstruction With Lowered Footing


49/127

Bridge Pier Reconstruction With Lowered Footing

Possible Bridge Jacking


50/127

Possible Bridge Jacking


51/127

HSR Preliminary Engineering

Select Alignment and Profile Locations

US 92

CSX RR (with and without Kathleen Road Station)

Osceola Parkway/Bonnet Creek

I-4/SR 528 Interchange

I 4 EB Realignment At US 92


52/127

I-4 EB Realignment At US 92

I-4 EB

REALIGNMENT

Profiles At CSX Railroad With And Without Kathleen Road Station


53/127

Profiles At CSX Railroad With And Without Kathleen Road Station

PLATFORM

LAKELAND

STATION

Profile with Kathleen Station Station and Platform Profile with No Station

US 98

KATHLEED RD

BELLA VISTA RD

CSXGRIFFIN RD

Plan View At Lakeland CSX Crossing


54/127

Plan View At Lakeland CSX Crossing

Section B-B


55/127

Section B-B


56/127

HSR Alignment At Ultimate I-4/SR 528 Interchange


57/127

HSR Alignment At Ultimate I 4/SR 528 Interchange

HSR on Viaduct

Orange County

Convention Center


58/127

Geotechnical Conditions

Purpose of the Geotechnical Investigation for Design-Build

Contracts (Early Works and P3) Gather data to support Preliminary Design and Cost Estimate

Provide Geotechnical Conditions Report to the Design-Build Firms

to support their Final Design and Cost Estimate

Storm water permitting requirements Reduce bid contingency for unknown geotechnical conditions

Expedite the Final Design and Construction Schedule


59/127


Todays Overview

Seasonal high water table Muck (organic soils)

Depth to foundation bearing layer

Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT)


60/127

Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT)

0-3

3-6

6-10

>10

Depth


61/127


Muck (Organic Soils) Deposits

Highly compressible Very weak

Can create excessive settlement

Can cause embankment failure

Highly variable depths Relic sinkhole features

Deepest muck on project to date 243 ft.

Organic Soil (Muck/Peat) Locations


62/127

g ( / )

No Organic Soils

1 to 5

5 to 20

20 to 50

Depth

50 to 100

>100

Approximate Foundation Lengths


63/127

pp g

Up to 75

75 to 100

100 to 125

125 to 150

Length

>150


64/127

Utilities Approach

Locate and map utilities

Perform SUE/Vvh at 500 +/- locations

Indentify utility conflicts (based on concept plans)

Perform legal review of compensable interest

Goal to initiate:

Design-Build agreements

Utility work schedules

Utility relocation plans

f l l


65/127

Summary of Critical Utilities

18 Gas Transmission Crossings

Depth of cover TBD

30 Aerial Transmission Crossings

Vertical separation to OCS TBD

119 Aerial Distributions Crossings Underground relocations are anticipated


66/127

Rail Systems & Operations

R il/S /OCS


67/127

Rail/Systems/OCS

R il/S /OCS


68/127

Rail/Systems/OCS

Alignment and Travel Speeds


69/127

C t l O i f th O ti C it i


70/127

Conceptual Overview of the Operations Criteria

Minimize station dwell times

Provide shortest possible trip time

Maximize train speed

Provide safe and secure waiting areas, platforms

Move passengers into/through/out of stations smoothly

Provide an overall positive customer experience

Sample FL HSR Preliminary Train Performance Plot


71/127

TOTAL TRIP TIME NON-STOP UNDER 50 MINUTES

TOTAL TRIP TIME WITH STOPS UNDER AN HOUR

R lli St k S f P f B d C it i


72/127

Rolling Stock: Summary of Performance Based Criteria

Operating speed: standard 186 mph+

Train capacity: 400-500 passengers per train

Amenities: cafe service, capability for two

classes of service, baggage storage throughout, bicycle

accommodations

Proven system: an existing technology with a

documented performance record

Safet and Sec rit Concepts


73/127

Safety and Security Concepts

Intrusion detection fencing provided to 16-0 above

adjacent road surfaces

High mounted, night-vision cameras with audio

capability provided along entire right-of-way (auto

activation when an intrusion is detected)

Security cameras monitor all station areas and platforms

Fence/Intrusion Detection System


74/127

50 Existing Bridges over HSR Corridor

Combination Separate

Operations Control Center


75/127

Operations Control Center

Location: Orlando Maintenance Facility

Train operations desk Power dispatch desk

Safety and security desk


76/127

Rule of Particular Applicability

(RPA)

Florida Rail Enterprise (FRE) Regulatory Approach


77/127

Florida Rail Enterprise (FRE) Regulatory Approach

FRE has elected to petition the FRA for a RPA specific

to the operations and technology selected for theFL HSR System

A working group has been set up with members

from FRA and FRE to develop a Regulatory or RPA

Guidance Document

RPA Guidance Document


78/127


Objective

Define the general structure of the RPA (i.e. what areasneed to be covered)

Identify:

Currently issued and applicable FRA regulations

Applicable regulations currently under development by the FRA andexpected to be issued in the near-term

Safety issues that are specific to the high-speed operations

proposed for Florida and that are not addressed by current or

proposed FRA regulations

Define technology-specific requirements that will need to be

included in a Petition for Rulemaking

FL HSR Guidance Document


79/127


Will follow the same outline as the Rule of Particular

Applicability (Notice of Proposed Rule Making- NPRM) ofDecember 1997

Retain key HSR safety elements that were contained in the

RPA (NPRM)

Eliminate any technology specific requirements that were

particular to the 1997 Rule (NPRM)



80/127


Describe what technology specific requirements will need

to be provided by the successful DBOM&F for inclusion inFREs Petition for Rulemaking

Identify existing FRA regulations that will be made

applicable to FL HSR

Applicable requirements contained in rules currently under

development will be incorporated directly within the


Define minimum safety standards (which might differ fromsubsequent specification requirements)

FL HSR Guidance Document Outline


81/127

FL HSR Guidance Document Outline

General Requirements

System Safety Program and Plan

Signal System

Track Safety Standards

Rolling Stock Operating Rules

System Qualification Tests

Personnel Qualification Requirements Power Distribution



82/127


Guidance Document

Working GroupGuidance Document

FRE

HNTB - WSA

RFP(including Guidance Document)

Successful DBOM&F

Petition for

Rulemaking Basedon Guidance Document

FRA RPA


83/127

Station Concepts

Station Concepts


84/127

Station Concepts

Goals: depict a functioning HSR station and develop

preliminary cost estimate

Each station has unique arrangements with respect to land

usage, agreements required, and ancillary development

opportunities

Memorandums of Understanding being pursued with

stakeholders as required

Tomorrows session: station stakeholders

Station Design Goals


85/127

Station Design Goals

Safety and Security

Functional Consistency Response to local context

Multi-modal/intermodal

Flexibility

Intuitive way finding

Accessibility

Comfortable, attractive,

durable and spacious

interiors

Sustainable Design

Strategies

Program Relationship Diagram


86/127

Level 1 - Public Concourse


87/127

Level 2 - Controlled Concourse


88/127

Level 3 - Platforms


89/127

Shown With Potential Light Rail Connection


90/127

Shown With Potential Overbuild


91/127

Shown With Potential Large Scale Platform Canopy


92/127

Downtown Tampa Station (TPA)


93/127

Lakeland Kathleen Road Station (LKL)


94/127

Lakeland USF Station (LKL)


95/127

Disney Station (DSN)


96/127

Orange County Convention Center (OCC)


97/127

Orlando International Airport Station (MCO)

courtesy of Greater Orlando Aviation Authority


98/127

y f y

Station Interior Public ConcourseIntermediate Station Prototype


99/127

Station Interior Public ConcourseShown With Potential Retail And Business Center


100/127

Station Interior Controlled ConcourseIntermediate Station Prototype


101/127

Station Interior PlatformsShown with individual platform canopies


102/127

Station Interior PlatformsShown with potential large scale canopy


103/127

Downtown Tampa Station (TPA)Shown with Potential Transit Oriented Development


104/127

Downtown Tampa Station (TPA)


105/127


106/127

Procurement and Financing

PPP: Request for Qualifications (RFQ)and Request for Proposals Development (RFP)


107/127

Development Team:

Florida Rail Enterprise FDOT: legal, financial, technical, professional services

Consultants: program manager (HNTB/WSA), legal (Freshfields)

and financial (KPMG)

Process draws from following: Recent major PPP contracts by FDOT: Port of Miami Tunnel

and I-595

Relevant components of other national and international transit

and HSR procurements

Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Features


108/127

Attachment to the RFQ:

Project Information Memorandum identification of key elementsin the scope of the RFP that will follow.

Review process:

Opportunity for industry feedback: one-on one meetings

November 9 and 10, 2010 Final compilation from development team mid-November

Subject to FRA approval, advertise late November/early December

RFQ shortlist:

Three teams, up to four

Request for Proposals (RFP) Features


109/127

RFP document attachments anticipated

30% Preliminary Engineering plans Station concept plans

Geotechnical exploration and data

Performance guidelines for HSR system (RPA)

Investment grade ridership study

Station area development stakeholders

MOUs or Agreements with stakeholders

Risk Register

Right-of-Way documentation

Utility agreements



110/127

FDOT has created four Non-Standard Types of Work to

address Engineering and Design Qualifications: Type 99.0 High Speed Rail Infrastructure Design Engineering

Type 99.0 High Speed Rail Sub-Systems Design Engineering

Type 99.0 Multimodal Passenger Station Design

Type 99.0 Maintenance Facility Design



111/127

Type 99.0 High Speed Rail Infrastructure Design Engineering

Three Professional Engineers each with at least 10 yearsof Rail Experience

The Lead Engineer is not required to have HSR Experience

Two ways for the Firm to Qualify:

In both cases the relevant HSR experience must be within the past 7 years

At least one of the

Professional Engineers

shall have 10 years of

HSR experience or more

Two advisors each having

10 years of HSR experience

can supplement the three

Professional Engineers required

OR



112/127

Type 99.0 High Speed Rail Infrastructure Design

Engineering - Structures Two Professional Engineers each with at least 15 years of

Design Experience

Professional Engineers must have Rail Design Experience within

the past 10 years

Professional Engineers shall qualify under TOW 4.2.1, 4.2.2 or

4.2.3 as required by the Proposed Final Design

Two ways for the Firm to Qualify:

In both cases the relevant HSR experience must be within the past 7 years

At least one of the

Professional Engineersshall have 10 years of

HSR experience or more

Two advisors each having

10 years of HSR experiencecan supplement the three

Professional Engineers required

OR


113/127


114/127



115/127

Lead Sub-System and Rolling Stock Contractor

Completed at least two commissioned HSR projects with anaggregate construction value of $300 million + in past 5 years

Experience requirements can be met through Joint Venture or Major Subcontracts

Lead Operator to have Passenger Rail Operations

experience At least one Mainline Railroad with Operating Speeds of

79mph/126kph or greater

Minimum Operational Term shall have been 3 years or longer



116/127

Lead Rolling Stock Manufacturer

Proven experience in the design, manufacture, testing anddelivery of passenger trains

Supplied one project within the past 5 years, with electric

steel-wheel-on-steel track trains capable of Operating Speeds of

186mph/300kph or more

Lead Infrastructure Contractor

Demonstrated Infrastructure experience on one HSR project

$50 million construction within past 5 years

Experience requirements can be met through Joint Venture,

Major Subcontracts or Construction Management personnel

with HSR Experience



117/127

Equity members with more than 30% interest in theConcessionaire must have closed five P3 financings within

the past 7 years which include:

each financing was in excess of $300 million

each financing packages actually closed

at least one such financing was an availability-based financing

at least one was in the U.S.

at least one such financing was a demand-based financing

Funding &Financing Plan:Design-Build-Operate-Maintain Finance


118/127

Potential structure to include:

30-year operating term Use of milestone payments during construction

Capex Recovery Payments during operations

Payment and performance bonds

Variety of financing instruments under consideration, including

PABs and TIFIA


119/127

Funding & Financing Plan:Ancillary Revenue Opportunities


120/127

Ancillary revenues from station development not

included in the Finance Plan Station Development:

Each station is a different commercial situation;

FDOT will spell out opportunities at each station in RFP

Advertising, retail and other revenue opportunities

will be identified in RFP

RFP will offer opportunities to propose revenue

opportunities


121/127

Minority Utilization: Where are we?


122/127

122

Federal Rail Administration Program Expectations

Florida Department of Transportation

Goal

Minority Utilization


123/127

123

What work applies towards goal?Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprises

http://www.dot.state.fl.us/equalopportunityoffice/dbecertification.shtm

Certified Minority Business Enterprises (includes

Service Disabled Veterans)http://dms.myflorida.com/other_programs/office_of_supplier_diversity_osd/certification/supporting_documentation

Where can I get certified?

FDOT

DMS Office of Supplier Diversity
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/equalopportunityoffice/dbecertification.shtmhttp://dms.myflorida.com/other_programs/office_of_supplier_diversity_osd/certification/supporting_documentationhttp://dms.myflorida.com/other_programs/office_of_supplier_diversity_osd/certification/supporting_documentationhttp://dms.myflorida.com/other_programs/office_of_supplier_diversity_osd/certification/supporting_documentationhttp://dms.myflorida.com/other_programs/office_of_supplier_diversity_osd/certification/supporting_documentationhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/equalopportunityoffice/dbecertification.shtm


124/127

PHASE 2: ORLANDO-MIAMI

Orlando Miami NEPA/PD&E process


125/127

Preliminary Design & Environmental (PD&E)

process

Three phased-approach, approx $30million total

Given federal funding availability,

requested funds for Phase 1 only for

next 12 months

RESULT: 100% of request was granted!

2010: HSIPR Planning Application

Total available: $50 million

Orlando-Miami: $8 million + State

Match Up to $2 millionTOTAL ORLANDO-MIAMI: $10 MILLION

Phase 2: Miami-Orlando


126/127

FDOT initiated PD&E (NEPA) in May 2010:

PB Americas/Jacobs

Mainly focused on data collection

Recent award will allow significant progress

FDOT designated PD&E Manager Aileen Boucle

Significant work to be done : 220 mile corridor

Will build upon previous work in corridor and lessons learned from

Tampa-Orlando

Design criteria and general approach similar to Tampa-Orlando

Compatibility/inter-operability will be achieved


127/127

Florida High Speed Railwww.floridahighspeedrail.org

Documents

FLHSR Industry Forum 110810-Web