Flexural Strength of Exterior Metal Building Wall Assemblies with Rigid Insulation

1

Flexural Strength of Exterior Metal Building Wall Assemblies with Rigid Insulation

Tian Gao and Cris Moen

The Charles E. Via, Jr. Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering Virginia Tech

www.moen.cee.vt.edu

SSRC Annual ConferenceGrapevine, Texas, April 18, 2012

http://www.moen.cee.vt.edu/

2

OUTLINE:

IntroductionSuction/Uplift LoadingDesign MethodsExperimentsOngoing Study

3

INTRODUCTION: Metal building

Metal Building

Metal Building

Metal BuildingMetal

Building

• Low rise, light weight and long span building.• Many cold-formed steel members are used.

4

Wind loading: Gravity/Pressure

Gravity

Pressure

5

Wind loading: Uplift/Suction

Uplift

Suction

Our focus!

6

Inside of the building:

Primary frame

7

Purlins (Roof)

Girts (Wall)


Primary frame

8

Purlins (Roof)

Sheathing

Girts (Wall)

Sheathing


Primary frame

9

Purlins (Roof)

Sheathing

Simple

Girts (Wall)

Sheathing

Continuous


Primary frame

Continuous

Simple

Through-fastened

Standing seam

Zee

Cee...

Purlin

Girt

Design variables:

None

Fiber glass

Rigid board

Uplift/Suction

Gravity/Pressure

X

XX

X

X

In this study, we will cover:

Purlin

Girt

Zee

Cee...

None

Fiber glass

Rigid board

Through-fastened

Standing seam

Uplift/Suction

Gravity/Pressure

Continuous

Simple

X

XX

X

X

12

LOADING: Wall/Suction

AA

Section A-A

screw

Wallpanel

girt

Wallpanel

girt

13

LOADING: Wall/SuctionBending + Rotation

X

X

Wallpanel

girt

Wallpanel

girt

14

LOADING: Roof/Uplift

Roof PanelB

B

Section B-B

X X

Bending + Rotation

kФ

15

DESIGN METHODS: Analytical approach

Peköz’s model

EuroCode

q

w K

Peköz, T.B., and Soroushian, P. (1982). “Behavior of C- and Z-purlins under wind uplift.” Proc., 6th International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures, Rolla, MO.

16


Peköz’s model

EuroCode

q

w K


kФ

???Test

17


Peköz’s model

EuroCode

q

w K


kФ

???Test

Gao, T., and Moen, C.D. (2012). “Rotational restraint prediction method for through-fastened metal building wall girts and roof purlins.” Thin-Walled Structures.

18

DESIGN METHODS: Experimental approach R-factor method

AISI AS/NZS

ye

t

FSMR

Fully braced girt/purlin capacity

Wall/roof flexural capacity in a full scale test (Vacuum Test)

19

AISI R-factor:

Depth Range, in. (mm) Profile R

d ≤ 6.5 (165) C or Z 0.70

6.5(165) < d ≤ 8.5 (216) C or Z 0.65

8.5 (216) < d ≤ 11.5 (292) Z 0.50

8.5 (216) < d ≤ 11.5 (292) C 0.40

d

CZ

20

50 VACUUM TESTS @ VT:

• Motivation: Energy efficiency (*ASHRAE-90.1).• Determine the R-factor for the case when the rigid

board insulation is used.

Girts

Metal panel

25mm Rigid Board 50mm 100mm

Girts

Metal panel

Girts

Metal panel

* ASHRAE-90.1. (2010). American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, GA.

21

Test setup:Girts

Girts

Rigid insulation

Rigid insulation

Panel

Panel

Vacuum

Vacuum

22

1. Failure modes (4) failure modes

2. Effect of cross-section local slenderness Stocky (200 mm deep, 2.5 mm thick) Slender (250 mm deep, 1.5 mm thick)

3. R-factors

Results: Stocky

Slender

23

Failure mode-1: Panel failure

24

Failure mode-2: Panel pull over

• Thick rigid board = “Washer”. • Can prevent panel pull over.

25

• If the rigid board insulation is used, and the girt is thick enough to clamp the screw.

Failure mode-3: Screw bending/fracture

Thickness BoardThickness

26

• The girt is too thin to clamp the screw.

Failure mode-3: NOT for slender girt

27

Rotation + Yielding Rotation + Local Buckling

Failure mode-4: Girt/Purlin failure

28

Slender Z-section, 50mm rigid board(Video)

http://www.youtube.com/user/drcrismoen

29

• Slender cross-section: the connection becomes not that important, because all action happens in the girts.• Stocky cross-section: connection failure.

Local slenderness

Slender Z-sectionStocky Z-section

30

R-factors for Z-section, bare panel

Slender

Failure modes:1. Panel failure2. Panel pull over3. Screw failure4. Girts failure

2 2 22

4 4

ye

t

FSMR

31

R-factors for Z-section, bare panel

• Panel pull over dominates for locally stocky Z-sections.

Stocky


2 2 22

4 4

ye

t

FSMR

32

R-factors for Z-section, rigid board

4 4 4 4Failure modes:1. Panel failure2. Panel pull over3. Screw failure4. Girts failure

ye

t

FSMR

• For slender Z250, No reduction in R-factor.

33

R-factors for Z-section, rigid board• For slender Z250, No reduction in R-factor.• For stocky Z200, R-factor is reduced from 0.65 to 0.5.

4 4 4 42 2

34

34

4Failure modes:1. Panel failure2. Panel pull over3. Screw failure4. Girts failure

ye

t

FSMR

34

R-factors for Z-section, rigid board• For slender Z250, No reduction in R-factor.• For stocky Z200, R-factor is reduced from 0.65 to 0.5.

4 4 4 42 2

34

34

4

kФ

LOW!Failure modes:1. Panel failure2. Panel pull over3. Screw failure4. Girts failure

Gao, T., Moen, C.D. (2011). “Flexural strength of exterior metal building wall assemblies with rigid Insulation.” Virginia Tech Research Report No. CE/VPI-ST-11/01, Blacksburg, Virginia.

35

R-factors for C-section, rigid board• For slender C250, No reduction in R-factor.• For stocky C200, R-factor is reduced from 0.65 to 0.4.

44 4 4

223

3 34


ye

t

FSMR

36

Summary:

• Bare panel:

• Rigid insulation:

• Slender cross-section:• Stocky cross-section:

37

Summary:

• Bare panel:



Panel pull over

38

Summary:

• Bare panel:



Panel pull over Prevent panel pull over Screw bending/fracture Lower kФ

39

Summary:

• Bare panel:




Girt/Purlin body

40

Summary:

• Bare panel:




Girt/Purlin body Connection

41

ONGOING STUDY (Limit State Design):

1. Panel failure:

2. Panel pull over:

3. Screw bending/fracture:

4. Girt/Purlin failure:

42


1. Panel failure:

2. Panel pull over:



• Use Direct Strength Method (DSM) to predict the panel flexural capacity.

DSM is using the buckling strengths (local, distortional and global) to predict the capacity.

43


1. Panel failure:

2. Panel pull over:



• Panel-flange connection study.• Panel connection failure.


AISI E4.2.2. Pull-Over

44


1. Panel failure:

2. Panel pull over:



• Board-flange connection study.• Flange thickness & screw.• Fastener bending study.


45


1. Panel failure:

2. Panel pull over:



46

ONGOING STUDY (4. Girts/Purlin failure):

kϕ

Finite strip analysis

• (Mcrl, Mcrd, Mcre)Mn

DSM

• EuroCode• Peköz



Bare panel

Rigid insulation

47

Primary results: DSM prediction• 46 simple span Vacuum Tests, uplift/suction loading.• Z and C-sections, bare panel only, girt/purlin failure.

Mean=1.01COV=19%

48

Questions

This presentation is @ www.moen.cee.vt.edu

http://www.moen.cee.vt.edu/

Documents

Flexural Strength of Exterior Metal Building Wall Assemblies with Rigid Insulation